The enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it’s the illusion of knowledge (Stephen Hawking)

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so (Mark Twain)

Invest with smart knowledge and objective odds

THE DAILY EDGE (28 February 2017)

Aircraft Sales Boosted U.S. Durable-Goods Orders in January Orders for long-lasting factory goods climbed last month due to purchases of military and civilian aircraft, overshadowing a weak start to 2017 for business investment in new equipment.

Orders for durable goods—products, like airplanes and dishwashing machines, that are designed to last at least three years—increased 1.8% in January from the prior month to a seasonally adjusted $230.35 billion, the Commerce Department said Monday. Economists surveyed by The Wall Street Journal had expected a 2.0% increase in total orders last month.

(…) Excluding the transportation segment, orders fell 0.2% from December.

A closely watched proxy for business investment in new equipment, new orders for nondefense capital goods excluding aircraft, fell 0.4% in January from the prior month. That was the sharpest one-month drop in the category since September.

Still, the broader trend remained positive. Total durable-goods orders were up 1.4% in January from a year earlier and orders for nondefense capital goods excluding aircraft rose 2.6% compared with January 2016. (…)

We will see if the expected tax reform which would allow businesses to totally expense capex in the first year will incite companies to defer some plans until the reform is effective.

image

U.S. Pending Home Sales Slip

Pending home sales, which measure how many homes went under contract, fell 2.8% from a month earlier to an index of 106.4 in January, the National Association of Realtors said.

Sales rose 0.4% from a year earlier.

Haver adds that

(…) the pending sales figures were mixed across regions, suggesting the series also may have been affected by weather. For example, the index in the West declined by 9.8% to 94.6, the lowest reading since June 2014, possibly reflecting the heavy rains in California. Meanwhile, pending sales in the Northeast hit a new cycle high of 98.7, amid unseasonably mild winter weather.

But Haver’s own charts reveal a trend beyond the weather, whether one looks at regional or nationwide trends:

 large image large image

Confused smile Could it possibly be higher house prices and rising mortgage rates?

 large image

In all, housing sure does not look like wanting to lead the economy here, does it:

Source: @IIF, @DeanDijour (via The Daily Shot)

And yet, US homebuilder shares are outperforming again on tight housing inventories.

Auto Car Dealer’s First Overflow Lot in 37 Years Exposes U.S. Pileup

(…) Dealers had about 85 days worth of cars and trucks on hand at the beginning of February — about 22 days more than at the beginning of 2017 and eight days more than a year earlier, according to Automotive News Data Center. (…)

Production cutbacks also have already begun. GM and Fiat Chrysler have eliminated shifts, laid off employees or scheduled days off early this year at plants making slower selling models including the Chevrolet Cruze compacts, Chrysler Pacifica minivans and Buick Lacrosse sedans. (…)

INFLATION WATCH

With businesses split on U.S. border tax, wider reform looks shaky
U.S. economy slows in the fourth-quarter; consumer spending remains bright spot
Evercore ISI: “Trump Budget Not Happening” 
A New Way to Look at Crazy Stock Valuations Valuations have been inflated by a collapse in profits for oil companies

(…) The energy sector stands at more than 30 times Thomson Reuters IBES’s estimate of operating earnings over the next 12 months, higher than any time from when the sector data started in 1995 up to last year—when it briefly reached an extreme of almost 60 times.

(…) investors who rely on the overall valuation of the index as a signal for future returns would be misled if they ignored the collapse in oil-sector profits.

Howard Silverblatt, senior index analyst at S&P Dow Jones Indices, puts the overall market at 18.1 times this year’s estimated operating earnings. When the energy sector—containing six of the seven S&P companies forecast to lose money this year—is excluded, the forward PE stands at 16.6, a much less frightening figure. (…)

There are both conceptual and practical objections to taking this as a signal that stocks are at a reasonable level. The conceptual problem is that it looks like manipulation of the figures to justify buying shares, a practice with a long and dishonorable history on Wall Street. (…)

The practical issue is more worrying. Even without energy, valuations are pretty high. (…)

I used that same argument one year ago at 1866 on the S&P 500 Index (UPGRADING EQUITIES TO 3 STARS) but the numbers were very different:

(…) But equity markets are even cheaper than they appear. The absolute P/E on trailing EPS is now 15.9, down from a recent peak of 18.2 in December 2014. This compares with a long term average of 13.7 (since 1927 and 1953, 18.5 since 1993). However, the Energy sector P/E is currently 40x because of depressed EPS when it normally is around 12x. This abnormally high multiple artificially inflates the overall S&P 500 Index P/E by about 2 full P/E points meaning that normalizing Energy, equities are actually selling at 13.9x EPS, right on their LT average and very low considering current low inflation and interest rates.

Applied on the Rule of 20, its current 18.0 reading drops to 16.0 with Energy normalized, meaning that fears about a U.S. recession, the oil rout, another banking crisis and the China syndrome have largely been factored in. (…)

Regular readers understand that the Rule of 20 is not a forecasting tool but rather an objective measure of risk and reward. In the current circumstances, the upside is between +13% and +25% while the downside seems limited in a no recession environment.

imageBut that was when Energy earnings were totally depressed, not quite the case anymore (chart on right) unless one sees a much higher oil price ahead.

Ed Yardeni has these P/E charts (on forward EPS) which show that other sectors’ P/E are not low contrary to early 2016:

image

If we normalize the S&P P/E using a P/E of 12 for Energy shares, the S&P 500 trailing P/E drops from 20 to 18.4 and the Rule of 20 P/E drops from 22.3 to 20.7, far from bargain levels in both cases.

(…) the ironclad law of economic growth is actually quite pliable. Real GDP annual growth of 3.5 percent would occur with 2.5 percent yearly growth in productivity and 1 percent rises in employment, the historic numbers. True, with low fertility rates, the Census Bureau sees the U.S. population rising just 0.2 percent a year by 2026, even with net immigration of 1.3 million annually over the next decade.

Nevertheless, the labor participation rate — the percentage of the population over 16 that is employed or actively looking for work — had plummeted to 62.9 percent in January from the 67.3 percent peak 17 years earlier. So 4.4 percent of the potential workforce, or 11.3 million people, have departed. About 60 percent were retiring postwar babies, but many are returning or staying in jobs past normal retirement ages because their health is better than their predecessors’ and because they need the income. Postwar babies have been notoriously poor savers throughout their lives. The participation rates of those over 65 are actually rising, not falling, as is normally true for seniors.

Also increasingly looking for work are youths who stayed in school during the dark Great Recession years and are now better educated and attracted by expanding job openings. In addition, skills to meet available jobs are being provided by apprenticeship programs that combine two-year college degrees with on-the-job training. German manufacturers brought this system with them to their factories in the U.S. Southwest, and it is increasingly being emulated by U.S. firms.

Trump’s threats of mass deportation of undocumented immigrants have been scaled back. They now target those with criminal records and other suspects. And with cooler heads in Congress, U.S. immigration policy may end up mirroring Canada’s with a point system aimed at admitting those with the skills this country needs.

Trump’s planned deregulation and lower corporate tax rates may spur capital spending, but the correlation between the growth in capital expenditures and productivity gains is low, sometimes negative. More machines alone don’t spur efficiency. More important, productivity-enhancing new technologies grow explosively, but since they start from essentially zero, it takes decades before they move the productivity needle significantly. Aside from those yet to be developed, today’s well-known technologies such as robotics, additive manufacturing, biotech and self-driving vehicles are no doubt still in their infancy.

The argument that protectionism inhibits economic growth is also suspect. Sure, eras of rapid global economic growth are also periods of strong foreign trade advances, but do trade gains stimulate economic activity or the reverse? You can’t prove causality with statistics. If you beat a drum every time there is a total eclipse of the sun, it will go away. No causality, but 100 percent correlation.

Also questionable is the robots-will-eliminate-workers theory. A recent McKinsey study found only 5 percent of 800 occupations and 2,000 job tasks are likely to be entirely automated. Instead, half of current jobs will be changed significantly, forcing employees to adjust. At the same time, automation may hike global productivity by 0.8 percent to 1.4 percent per year during the next half century.

The catalyst for the return to rapid economic growth will, no doubt, be a huge fiscal stimulus program. Voters who are mad as hell after a decade or more of no growth in real incomes elected Trump and the Republican Congress, and politicians will respond. It will take two or three years to come to fruition, but look for huge infrastructure outlays and large increases in military spending. Stocks don’t normally discount that far ahead, but maybe that’s what leaping equities are anticipating, despite all the uncertainty in Washington, the nation and, indeed, the world.

Here’s what Shilling wrote in his always excellent Insight of Feb. 2017:

We continue to look for massive fiscal stimuli and rapid economic growth in reaction to voters mad as hell over a decade of no purchasing power growth, but that’s only after the two or three years it takes for Congress to act; increased defense spending to occur and infrastructure outlays to work their way through the states that actually spend the money. We also wrote that the Fed, zealous for fiscal stimuli since monetary policy is impotent, would buy the resulting surge in new Treasury debt to keep leaping bond yields from offsetting the effects of increased government spending—helicopter money.

We also noted that Congress stands between Trump and fiscal spending, but the President is relatively free to pursue the principal goal that got him elected, protectionism. So it would be international actions first and fiscal stimuli later, we argued. So far, that’s the way it’s unfolding.

Fiscal action is on hold while Trump escalates the ongoing trade war with China, plans a Mexican wall and tightens immigration policy. So the Trump trades are being reconsidered with stabilized Treasury bond prices, flat oil prices and stocks moving sideways after the Dow Jones Industrial Average’s much-ballyhooed breakthrough to 20,000 failed to hold.

These recent actions make us more confident over the long-run investment themes we laid out last month, although we continue to urge caution and large cash holdings in portfolios. (…)

Uncertain equity prices. They are expensive in relation to corporate earnings, and those earnings are not based solidly on revenue gains but on cost-cutting, which appears to have run its course. As noted earlier, investors jumped the gun on the revival of rapid economic growth. Markets anticipate, but it’s probably too early to discount fiscal stimuli that will take two or three years to materialize. Nevertheless, equity bull markets don’t die of old age, and the current one may continue until terminated by a financial shock or by central bank restraint.

Gavyn Davies: Whatever happened to secular stagnation?

THE DAILY EDGE (27 February 2017): Earnings Watch

U.S. New-Home Sales Rose 3.7% in January New home sales rebounded in January after a steep decline in December, an indication that the new-construction market remains on the path to recovery despite bumps along the way.

Purchases of newly built, single-family houses, which account for a small share of overall U.S. home sales, increased 3.7% from December to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 555,000 last month, the Commerce Department said Friday.

The data was clouded, however, by a margin of error of 18.5 percentage points that is much larger than the reported increase. A 15.8% increase in Northeast sales led the pack last month, but that figure had a margin of error of 79.3 percentage points. (…)

The 12-month rolling total of new homes sold, which helps smooth out some of the monthly volatility, is up 12% year-over-year, according to Ralph McLaughlin, chief economist at Trulia.

“We’re seeing new-home sales climb pretty solidly month after month,” he said. New-home sales are now at about 85% of their 50-year norm, according to Mr. McLaughlin, although that doesn’t account for population growth. (…)

Single-family construction climbed 1.9% in January, while multifamily construction tumbled 10.2%.

Inventory of new homes available for sale climbed sharply in January to the highest level since September 2009 (…)

Executives at Toll Brothers said on a recent investor call that contracts for new homes were up 42% in January compared with a year earlier. (…)

 large image large image

(Haver Analytics)

  • Sales were up 5.5% year-over-year in January,  However, January and February were the weakest months last year on a seasonally adjusted annual rate basis – so this was an easy comparison. Note that these sales (for January) occurred after mortgage rates increased following the election. (CalculatedRisk)
  • The Census Bureau’s mid-month population estimates show a 72.6% increase in the US population since 1963. Here is a chart of new home sales as a percent of the population. (Doug Short)

Population Adjusted

  • The cost of rent in the US is expected to keep rising faster than the rate of inflation or wages. The biggest increases are taking place in the “affordable” multifamily rentals (i.e. those for working households – labeled “Workforce”). (The Daily Shot)

Source: Fannie Mae, @joshdigga

Mall Closures Ripple Through Small-Town America

(…) Specialty retailers such as the Limited and department stores such as Sears and Macy’s in recent months have announced plans to close hundreds of stores nationwide and slash jobs as online shopping takes a growing share of revenue. (…)

Malls in smaller U.S. cities are often linchpins of local economies and their struggles can have a ripple effect, from jobs and tax revenues to the fortunes of logistics and transportation companies that provide trucking and inventory support for stores. Creditors who invest in mortgage securities tied to troubled malls face the risk of default. (…)

Economic Surveys Show Deep Splits in Confidence Along Party Lines Since the election of President Donald Trump, consumer confidence and sentiment surveys that ask participants about the health of the economy have seen their responses divided like never before along partisan lines.
 

(…) Three big drivers of business enthusiasm have been hopes for corporate tax reform, less regulation and the prospect of major infrastructure spending that could flood manufacturers and construction firms with work. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin has said that tax reform could take until August. Regulations could also take years to roll back. Meantime, the details of an infrastructure package have yet to emerge, and even once enacted such projects take a notoriously long time.

Investors, like Republicans, are inferring in Mr. Trump a high probability of success despite obstacles he faces. The stock market is up more than 10% since the election. Andrew Liveris, chief executive of Dow Chemical Co., participated in a roundtable of business leaders who met with Mr. Trump last week. Afterward, he said “to have the U.S. government speak the language of business is a completely new experience.”

In the end, expectations will need to square up with the economy’s real performance.

Source: Gary Cohn says no go on border adjustment tax

Gary Cohn, chief economic advisor to President Trump, told a group of CEOs this morning that the White House does not support the House GOP version of a border adjustment tax, according to an attendee.

The comment was made while Cohn was being interviewed by The Carlyle Group CEO David Rubenstein, at a private event hosted by The Business Council in Washington, D.C. It also comes less than 24 hours after Trump indicated some support for the House language, in a conversation with Reuters.

UPDATE: The White House is disputing this report, issuing the following statement: “There is no daylight between Gary Cohn and the President. His comment was taken out of context as it was part of a broader conversation about the proposals that are connected to border adjustability. At no point during this conversation did Gary make a statement of support or opposition to the House border adjustability plan.”

The White House declined to make audio of Cohn’s comments available to Axios, citing the confidentiality of the Business Council session.

Hmmm…This is bordering on inside information.

Anyway, where will the money come from to finance the tax reform?

Bank Lending Signals Caution

Total loans and leases by U.S. commercial banks are currently rising at an annual pace of about 5%, based on weekly seasonally adjusted data from the Federal Reserve. That is down from a 6.4% pace for all of last year and peak rates of around 8% in mid-2016.

The deceleration has been broad-based across business, real estate and consumer lending and is at odds with the idea of a stronger economy and rising sentiment. The slowdown has been particularly stark in commercial and industrial lending, which was growing at around 10% in the first half of last year, but is now up just 5.7% from a year earlier.

There are two possible causes, says Barclays analyst Jason Goldberg. One is that companies are selling more bonds to lock in cheap financing before rates rise. (…)

The other, more worrisome explanation is that political uncertainty is causing companies and banks to put off big decisions until the outlook for trade and tax policy is clearer. The lending slowdown began showing up clearly just before the election last year. (…)

Just kidding Nobody should be surprised that companies put some spending projects on hold pending the eventual tax reform.

World Trade Flows Grew at Slowest Pace Since Financial Crisis International trade flows grew at the slowest pace since the financial crisis in 2016, but there were signs of a modest pickup as the year drew to a close.

The Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis said on Friday that the volume of exports and imports of goods was 1.2% higher than in 2015, marking a slowdown from the 2% rate of growth recorded in the preceding year and the smallest rise since volumes crashed in 2009.

However, there were signs exports and imports might be reviving, with volumes up 1.1% in the final three months of the year compared with the third quarter, almost double the rate of increase in the three months to September. (…)

Over the longer term, world trade has usually grown at 1.5 times the rate of total economic output. During the period of rapid globalization in the 1990s, trade grew at twice the rate of economic output.

However, it appears to have grown more slowly than total output in 2016. (…)

“The rise of protectionism is more likely to accelerate than slow down,” Raoul Leering, head of international trade research at ING Bank, said. “The uncertainty around possible import tariffs by the U.S. also leads to a ‘wait and see’ attitude of companies with regard to offshoring, another driver of trade.” (…)

Amid much gloom, there are some positives for world trade. An international agreement to streamline the movement of goods across borders came into force Thursday, cutting trade costs by 14.3%, according to the World Trade Organization. The Trade Facilitation Agreement should make it more affordable for smaller firms to engage in trade. (…)

NBF adds this:

Emerging markets saw industrial output outpacing exports by the largest margin in four years. Unless all of that extra output was absorbed by domestic demand (which is unlikely), the stagnation of exports means already-bloated inventories grew further in emerging economies. As today’s Hot Charts show, the ratio of industrial production to exports at the end of 2016 was close to levels reached during the Great Recession of 2008-09. That could cap production and hence economic growth in emerging markets in the early parts of 2017.

image

The Trump administration is exploring alternatives to taking trade disputes to the World Trade Organisation in what would amount to the first step away from a system that Washington helped to establish more than two decades ago. (…)

Since being established in 1995 the WTO has become the pre-eminent venue for resolving trade fights between member countries, which its proponents say has helped prevent destructive trade wars. While the US would remain a WTO member under the Trump administration’s plans, the officials’ move reflects the sceptical view many of them have of an institution they see as a plodding internationalist bureaucracy biased against US interests. (…)

INFLATION WATCH

For the first time in almost four years, none of the eurozone’s 19 members was in deflation during January, an encouragement to the European Central Bank in its long struggle to lift inflation to its target and keep it there.

The European Union’s statistics agency Wednesday confirmed an earlier estimate that showed consumer prices in the currency area were 1.8% higher than a year earlier, a jump from the 1.1% inflation rate recorded in December 2016 and within touching distance of the ECB’s target, which is close to, but below 2%. (…)

In inflation-averse Germany, prices were 1.9% higher than a year earlier in January, amplifying calls for an end to ECB stimulus. The central bank has said it won’t consider a tapering of its stimulus programs until it is clear that inflation will remain around its target, even after energy prices have stopped rising. That would requires a pickup in the pace at which prices of other goods and services are rising. However, there were few, if any, signs of a buildup in underlying inflationary pressures during January. The core rate of inflation, which excludes energy, food, alcohol and tobacco, was unchanged at 0.9%, and lower than in January 2016. (…)

image

Something strange happened in January. MoM food and energy prices rose but prices of just about everything else collapsed, including services prices.

image

  • Canadian CPI surprised to the upside as inflation strengthens globally. (The Daily Shot)

  • UK’s retailers are planning a sizeable price increase, driven by the pound’s weakness. (The Daily Shot)

Source: @Not_Jim_Cramer

(…) retail sales contracted in January by 0.3% from the previous month, the Office for National Statistics said Friday, dragging the annual rate of growth down to 1.5%, the weakest expansion in more than three years. (…)

The January slowdown was driven to a large extent by rising prices for fuel and food, the ONS said. Sterling has lost around 15% against the dollar since the referendum result, a decline that is fueling a surge in inflation: Consumer prices rose 1.8% in January, the fastest rate of growth in 2 ½ years, and the Bank of England expects annual inflation to overshoot its 2% target within months. (…)

Average wages after inflation grew by merely 1.4% in the three months to December, the slowest pace of growth in two years. (…)

EARNINGS WATCH
  • With 92% of the companies in the S&P 500 having reported Q4’16, Factset calculates that 66% of S&P 500 companies have beat the mean EPS estimate and 52% of S&P 500 companies have beat the mean sales estimate.
  • Earnings Growth for Q4’16 is 4.9% vs +3.1% expected on Dec. 31 2016. Thomson Reuters/IBES is at +7.7% for Q4.
  • So the Q4 earnings season started with a bang but ended only so-so with the beat rate well below last year’s 71% and the EPS surprise totalling +1.8% (+2.9% last week), much lower than the 1-year (+4.4%) average and below the 5-year (+4.2%) average. TR’s surprise factor is at +2.2%.
image
  • Earnings Guidance for Q1 2017 shows that 67 S&P 500 companies have issued negative EPS guidance and 31 companies have issued positive EPS guidance. IT companies provided 34 of the 98 warnings with 18 of the 34 being positive. Ex-IT, 51 of the 64 companies providing guidance have guided negatively (80%).
  • Factset now sees Q1’17 EPS up 9.3%, unchanged from last week but down from +12.5% on Dec. 31. TR is at +10.5% for Q1’17.

image

  • Interesting to see Industrials’ Q1 estimates down from +0.6% last Dec. 31 to –5.7%. This while the sub-index rose 16% since Nov. 8 and 5% since Dec. 31.
  • TR’s tally shows that estimate revisions remain somewhat negative for S&P 500 companies but are deteriorating at a faster pace for the all U.S. companies.

imageimage

Something needs to change course on this chart from Lance Roberts:

The Rule of 20 P/E is now 22.3. Did you miss DEEP INTO THE TWILIGHT ZONE?

image
SENTIMENT WATCH

(…) But other than paying high prices, investors aren’t behaving at all the way they typically do during bubbles.

One hallmark of a bubble is that stock trading becomes frenzied. In 1999, trading volume rose sharply, and dot-com stocks made up to 20% of the shares exchanging hands. But trading is looking pretty staid at the moment—indeed, daily volume since Mr. Trump was elected is below its year-earlier level.

Another bubble tell: Leverage. When irrational exuberance take hold, investors buy more stock using borrowed money in hopes of magnifying their gains. Margin debt is up, but as a share of the stock market’s value it has remained steady. In the dot-com bubble, it shot higher. (…)

Joe Public is generally late at the party and is the one pushing volumes and indices higher near the peaks. But Joe is already up to his ears in equities per this Ned Davis chart (via Evergreen/Gavekal):

WHEN INVESTORS HAVE HIGH STOCK ALLOCATIONS, LOW RETURNS ARE INEVITABLE

But Joe is busy moving away from expensive mutual funds to ETFs and robots which contribute to the trend:

(…) Four leading robo-advisers — Betterment, Schwab Intelligent Portfolios, Vanguard Portfolio Advisory Services and Wealthfront — have roughly doubled their assets in the past year, to $77 billion.

In 2016, 82% of new retail investments coming through financial advisers (more than $400 billion) went into index funds and ETFs, according to Broadridge Financial Solutions, which helps process such trading.

All told, U.S.-based exchange-traded portfolios have amassed $2.6 trillion, says ETFGI, a research group in London. Target-date funds hold $915 billion, according to Morningstar, the investment-research firm.

We — including financial journalists, like me — have created a new breed. Today’s investors aren’t what the financial analyst Benjamin Graham described as “enterprising,” or willing to put time and energy into the search for bargains.

Instead, investors buy and hold (or at least intend to) regardless of whether entire markets are undervalued or overpriced.

“There’s an automaticity of investing here,” says the Investment Company Institute’s chief economist, Brian Reid, “where the vast majority of assets seem to stay in place.”

In short, the moralistic and puritanical view of investing that has prevailed for decades — how well you succeed at it is determined by how hard you work at it — is being replaced by an agnostic model in which you hope to succeed by clicking and letting it ride.

Benjamin Graham also warned that “there are no sure and easy paths to riches on Wall Street or anywhere else.” So it’s tempting to conclude that when we make investing effortless — and, frankly, mindless — we make it more dangerous.

In the late 1960s, Wall Street strategists argued that a flood of money from pension plans would drive stocks irresistibly higher. The favorite shares were called “one-decision stocks”: Your only choice was how much of them to buy. You’d never need to consider selling. The 37% crash of 1973-74 stifled that argument. (…)

“GURU” STUFF:

Nerd smile From Barron’s interview with Davis Rosenberg:

  • Last year, the first of the boomers turned 70, and there will be 1½ million boomers turning 70 in each of the next 15 years. That is where the wealth and power still reside. But the other part is that some of the data shows that half of the boomers now heading into retirement have savings of $100,000 or less. In this segment of the population we have a savings crisis. A lot of these people have taken on student debt to help their children and grandchildren.
  • The markets have given the administration the benefit of the doubt. The question is, how much patience does Mr. Market have, because it is very clear that there is no agreement on the border-adjustment tax, there is no broad agreement among House Republicans about whether tax reform should be revenue neutral, and if not, how far would we drive the deficit up?
  • When you get three things together—a sub-11 VIX [the CBOE Volatility Index], an 18 forward multiple, and 60%-plus bulls in Investors Intelligence— and you look at the history, you’ll see that upside to this market is extremely limited. Volatility and uncertainty are underpriced. There will be better buying opportunities this year. Are we going into a bear market? No. We will have a flattish year, with a tremendous amount of volatility. Fiscal policy is as tapped out as monetary policy is.

More from Rosy via Lance Roberts’ Visualizing 10-Reasons For Caution.

Nerd smile Gundlach expects U.S. 10-year T-note yield to drop below 2.25 percent Jeffrey Gundlach, chief executive of DoubleLine Capital, said on Friday he expects the yield on the benchmark 10-year U.S. Treasury note to drop below 2.25 percent as global investors seek safety.

(…) “There is a stealth flight to safety going on. German bond yields are leading the way down,” Gundlach said in emailed comments. “Gold is rising. Speculators remain massively short bonds and the market is going to squeeze them out.” (…)

Gundlach noted: “Stocks are out of synch with the stealth flight to safety. Lots of hope built in.” (…)

Nerd smile Lessons From the Oracle: Warren Buffett’s Annual Letter, Annotated
TECHNICAL STUFF

I am not a big fan of technical stuff but Lowry’s does intelligent analysis. Their latest comment is very bullish: their demand/supply calculations show expanding demand and contracting supply, their market breadth measure is positive among all caps and their new highs vs new lows trends show “few signs of a weakening primary uptrend”.

I pay attention to the 200-day m.a.: it is still rising but the step back to the mean is getting steeper. Financials (18.4%) and IT (12.4%) are particularly high vs their 200-d. m.a.

image

Lance Roberts has this chart on the same gap measure:

And this other one:

The chart below brings this idea of reversion into a bit clearer focus. I have overlaid the 3-year average annual real return of the S&P 500 against the inflation-adjusted price index itself.

Historically, we find that when price extensions have exceeded a 12% deviation from the 3-year average return of the index, the majority of the market cycle had been completed. While this analysis does NOT mean the market is set to crash, it does suggest that a reversion in returns is likely. Unfortunately, the historical reversion in returns has often coincided at some juncture with a rather sharp decline in prices.

Facing Criticism, Drug Makers Keep Lid On Price Increases This year, pharmaceutical companies didn’t raise prices for as many drugs as last year and imposed fewer boosts of 10% or more, worried about the potential for a political and public backlash. Among the critics they face is President Trump.

About 5.5% of the increases reached the 10% level. A year ago, 15% did, and two years ago, 20% did. Even so, the median drug-price increase was little changed from last year, at 8.9%, still far above the U.S. inflation rate of around 2%. (…)

In all, producers raised the U.S. list prices of 2,353 prescription drugs in January. That was about a quarter fewer than in January 2016, according to Raymond James, which based its analysis on prices known as the “wholesale-acquisition cost.”

In the drug industry, “price increases have become a substitute for innovation,” said the CEO of Inc.,Leonard Schleifer, in an interview. “If we continue to go crazy with price increases, the government will have to step in.” Regeneron hasn’t raised prices on its three drugs since their launch. (…)

The industry has moved to restrain price increases before. Early in the Clinton administration, worried about a risk of price controls, the main pharmaceutical-industry trade group pledged to limit increases to the consumer inflation rate.

Such self-policing “has never been long-lasting,” Goldman Sachs wrote in a note to clients this past September, adding: “Price increases have become an industrywide practice, especially since 2010, when reliance on higher price increases” for revenue growth intensified.

Exclusive: Wal-Mart launches new front in U.S. price war, targets Aldi in grocery aisle Wal-Mart Stores Inc is running a new price-comparison test in at least 1,200 U.S. stores and squeezing packaged goods suppliers in a bid to close a pricing gap with German-based discount grocery chain Aldi and other U.S. rivals like Kroger Co , according to four sources familiar with the moves.