The enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it’s the illusion of knowledge (Stephen Hawking)

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so (Mark Twain)

Invest with smart knowledge and objective odds

THE DAILY EDGE: 11 NOVEMBER 2020

US labour market recovery set to lose steam in the short term

(…) If the pace of employment gains experienced over the past three months can be sustained, the US would be back to its pre-COVID level of employment by September next year. However, there are reasons to think that this pace will not be sustained. For one, any further fiscal support is likely to be much less generous than in the spring. Meanwhile, daily new coronavirus cases are surpassing previous peaks. Against that backdrop, we expect softer employment growth in the months to come, with therapeutics or a vaccine possible tailwinds to jobs growth next year.

U.S. JOLTS: Job Opportunities Rate Holds Steady but Hiring Slips

(…) The job openings level rose 1.3% to 6.436 million, down 8.7% y/y. The job openings level in the construction sector fell 31.2% y/y but in manufacturing, it rose 3.4% y/y. It fell by 21.5% y/y in leisure & hospitality but rose 1.3% y/y in the professional & business service sector. In government, the number of job openings declined 3.6% y/y. (…)

In September, the level of hiring declined 1.4% to 5.871 million (-1.5% y/y) following a 0.8% August gain. (…)

fredgraph - 2020-11-11T061017.000

fredgraph - 2020-11-11T061106.373

The fact that there was not much change in the latest data from the federal Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) is a bad sign for this labor market recovery. The number of job openings didn’t really change from the month before. The quits rate, a sign of worker confidence, was also very similar to the prior month. For signs of a strong labor market recovery, both of these numbers need to rise. That is not what we are seeing.

Another concerning sign is that while layoffs went down in September, the outlook for jobless workers looking for a new job worsened. A measure of unemployment that more fully captures permanent unemployment— the ratio of unemployed workers to job openings — increased in September.

It’s hard to see any signs of backsliding, but there aren’t any signs of acceleration in the recovery either. Hiring isn’t speeding up, and, if job openings are any indication, it is unlikely to do so in the near term. In a labor market with 10 million fewer jobs than February, we need to see hiring moving at a faster clip to avoid lasting damage.

bar graph tightness of the labor market varied by unemployment metric

U.S. Covid-19 Cases Hit Fresh High Coronavirus cases continue to surge across much of the U.S. as hospitals in some states grapple with crowded intensive-care units.

The U.S. set another single-day record for coronavirus cases, as the total number of new infections topped 136,000, while hospitalizations due to Covid-19 were at their highest level since the pandemic began. (…)

Hospitalizations, up around 30% since the beginning of the month, reached 61,964 as of Tuesday, exceeding the previous high of 59,940 reached on April 15, according to the Covid Tracking Project. A summer surge also saw hospitalizations reach just shy of 60,000 in July.

Intensive-care units are also facing an upsurge in patients due to the pandemic, with 11,952 people in ICUs in the U.S. as of Tuesday, the highest number since May 7. (…)

0_All Key Metrics (42)

image

U.S. metropolitan areas are averaging a record 27.8 daily coronavirus cases per 100,000 people, according to U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data. Although rural areas are still worse on a per-capita basis, it’s clear that cities have been swept up in the pandemic again.

The surge has expanded from highly rural states in the Midwest and Rocky Mountain West to areas with bigger populations and more urban living. That has meant rising cases in and around Denver, Detroit and Chicago. Further to the east, the virus is mounting a comeback around Newark, New Jersey, and Boston. (…)

unnamed (99)

Source: WSJ

(…) The share of New York City residents who tested positive for the new coronavirus last week reached 2.31%, the highest percentage since June, according to city data. The daily positivity rate was 2.88% on Sunday, the data showed. (…) Hitting a 3% positivity rate on a seven-day average across the city could also trigger more restrictions, such as moving public schools to all-remote instruction and closing some businesses. (…)

New York state added nearly 4,000 Covid-19 cases on Monday, according to the governor’s office. The state’s daily positivity rate was 3.09%; the rate hasn’t hit 3% since May 26 and the state hasn’t seen this case load since May 1. On Monday, there were 32 deaths from the virus in New York. (…)

  • Israel was first to impose national restrictions, entering a month of lockdown from 18 September. Ireland followed, beginning a six-week period of national lockdown on 21 October. The renewed lockdowns in these two countries have proved extremely effective in bringing down the number of identified cases of COVID-19. Fathom Consulting)

image

image

image
Banks in Europe Face Potential $1.7 Trillion Covid-19 Cliff European banks say they are doing just fine during the coronavirus pandemic. But regulators and bank executives are concerned about the elephant in the room: a wave of bad loans that could overwhelm lenders when government rescue packages end.

(…) The European Central Bank said bad loans in the eurozone could soar as high as €1.4 trillion, equivalent to $1.7 trillion, if the economies fall even more than expected, a scenario the central bank said is severe but plausible. That amount would be more than during the aftermath of the financial crisis.

The concern is that banks could run out of capital if they are suddenly overwhelmed by defaults, needing state support or even failing. What isn’t clear right now is how quickly those defaults could pile up, or if state programs might cushion banks’ losses for years to come. (…)

In Italy—where banks are still trying to deal with old bad-debt portfolios—over 25% of loans to businesses and 15% to households, totaling around €300 billion, were put under payment holidays, according to Marco Troiano, deputy head of the banks team at the ratings company Scope Ratings. (…)

In Portugal, where companies and the government are highly indebted, loan moratoriums to businesses covered almost a third of the total, according to the country’s central bank. Over half of the credit to companies in the hospitality and restaurant sectors are under the program. (…)

Part of the reason for the rosy picture from banks comes down to accounting rules. Banks can typically count a loan as performing until there is actual deterioration, such as missed interest payments or a company going bankrupt.

Andrea Enria, the head of the ECB’s supervision arm, said some banks are being optimists and waiting until there is concrete evidence a customer is going bankrupt. (…)

Borrowers still taking payment holidays on $90bn of loans at top US banks Total halved over third quarter but remains elevated, obscuring outlook for defaults
Ackman places new bet against corporate credit Billionaire says markets are once again complacent about the impact of pandemic

(…) “I hope we lose money on this next hedge,” Mr Ackman said. “We’re in a treacherous time generally and what’s fascinating is the same bet we put on eight months ago is available on the same terms as if there had never been a fire and on the probability that the world is going to be fine.” (…)

Cyclical Stocks Power Dow Industrials Higher

(…) The Dow has outperformed the technology-heavy Nasdaq by 6.74 percentage points this week, the largest two-day performance spread since March 2001. It rose 262.95 points, or 0.9%, to 29420.92 on Tuesday, its third-highest close in history. Boeing, Chevron and 3M were among the biggest gainers.

The Nasdaq Composite, meanwhile, fell 159.53 points, or 1.4%, to 11553.86, with the big technology stocks that have powered much of this year’s stock rally pulling back for a second consecutive session. The S&P 500 edged down 4.97 points, or 0.1%, to 3545.53. (…)

unnamed (14)

unnamed (98)

Buy-losers-and-sell-winners hits historic proportions

(…) The two periods with dispersions as great as they are now both led to extended periods of smaller stocks doing better than larger ones.

The same pattern holds true for value versus growth stocks. By the time dispersion among the factors reached the current level, value stocks were about to embark on multiple years with massive outperformance relative to growth.

Investors have been looking for a turn in these relationships for years, and yet in most respects, they just keep getting more extreme. It seems like Monday’s shock, building on the massive differences in positioning for most of this year, is enough to equate to some of the most notable changes in 75 years, and that has been a very good relative sign for small and value stocks.

Out of all the major indexes, none are benefitting from the positive vaccine developments more than the Russell 2000 index of small-capitalization stocks.

Even without Monday’s massive rally, it has performed well enough that its medium-term trend has jumped well above its long-term one, thanks to a kick-off surge in early October. Respected technician Helene Meisler noted that the 50-day average of the index has moved the most above its 200-day average since 2017.

Russell 2000 spread between 50 and 200 day average

While there have been wider spreads between the two trend measures, by the time it reached 8%, it has been a good sign for the index.

Returns were okay over the short- to medium-term but really shined over the next year. There were no losses out of the 11 signals, and the risk/reward was impressively skewed to the upside.

Goldman’s bull case:

S&P 500 index: We lift our year-end 2020 target to 3700 (+4%) consistent with our previously published fair value estimate of the market under a divided Congress scenario. Our prior target was 3600. We forecast S&P 500 will climb by 16% to 4300 at year-end 2021 and gain 7% to reach 4600 by the end of 2022. The market is actually less dependent on the performance of a few mega-cap stocks than many investors perceive.

Stronger-than-expected 3Q results lead us to raise our S&P EPS forecasts to $175 in 2021 (from $170) and to $195 in 2022 (from $188) reflecting growth of 29% and 12%, respectively. For comparison purposes, our top-down 2021 EPS forecast is 4% above the bottom-up consensus expectation of $168 and 13% above the median consensus top-down forecast of $155.

image

Valuation: Falling equity risk premium supports a higher valuation for stocks. Our S&P 500 year-end 2020 target implies a forward P/E multiple of 21x. We project the multiple will expand to 22x by end 2021 and remain stable in 2022.

Note: The red lines above and below are mine. image

But GS rises to the valuation challenge:

Reconciling the signals of absolute vs. relative valuation is challenging. Stocks are highly valued on an absolute basis relative to history. The aggregate index trades above the 90th percentile on a variety of metrics including P/E, EV/sales, EV/EBITDA, Price/Book, and market cap/GDP. This suggests caution is warranted. However, the index and the median S&P 500 constituent are actually modestly undervalued on a relative basis compared with US Treasury yields and corporate bond yields, currently averaging at the 42nd percentile since 1976.

But why are interest rates so low again?

Rosenberg: Pfizer’s promising COVID-19 vaccine is a potential game changer for the economy and how to invest

(…) I had been in the camp of Dr. Anthony Fauci, where a vaccine was more of a late 2021 story with perhaps 60-per-cent efficacy. Now that timetable may well be moved up to no later than late in the first quarter and, at 90 per cent, there is no longer the fear that a take-up is going to be low.

The bottom line is that downside economic risks, which always have been tied to health risks, have subsided sharply. (…)

All that said, there are tailwinds for the equity market here, and the value stocks are still so cheap in relative and absolute terms that this trade could persist a while longer. But at this point, the Pfizer news has to go from success in a trial to something real and tangible. (…)

If the initial market reaction is correct, then we should be seeing the inoculations begin by the end of the first quarter of 2021. This is what is being priced in. That means no first-quarter U.S. GDP contraction and it means a likely second-quarter economic boom.

We shouldn’t be too dismissive of the timing. First, winter is coming and that means, absent a vaccine, the case counts, hospitalizations and fatalities are likely to get worse. Human nature is such that people will now be willing to be patient with the vaccine coming soon. As in, why screw this up? So this, along with thin U.S. stimulus spending, does complicate the economic backdrop for this quarter and perhaps into the first quarter of the new year. (…)

If people begin to see that life is going back to normal, we are talking about a US$700-billion hole in the consumer-services area of the economy (like airlines, rail, hotels, restaurants, retail, etc.) that will get filled, and likely rather quickly. This is a 3-per-cent boost to U.S. GDP right there, not including all the other multiplier effects from a speedier pace of job creation and generally increased economic confidence. (…)

China tech stocks tumble as regulators step up antitrust pressure Sector loses almost $254bn in value as banking watchdog focuses on fintech monopolies
Most Americans believe Joe Biden won. About 79% of those surveyed by Reuters/Ipsos, including almost six in 10 Republicans, backed the outcome, while 13% said the result is still undecided and 3% think Trump won. (Bloomberg)

THE DAILY EDGE: 22 SEPTEMBER 2020

U.S. Coronavirus Cases Jump, With Death Toll Just Below 200,000  Some 52,000 new Covid-19 infections were reported in the U.S., the highest single-day increase since Aug. 14, as some guidelines and practices for stopping the disease’s spread have been called into question.

(…) Meanwhile, experts and medical groups increasingly say temperature checks, one of the most common initial screenings for the infection, aren’t a good gauge of Covid-19. Many infected children and adults don’t get fevers, and variability in individual temperatures, as well as questions about the accuracy of body-temperature scanners and infrared contact-free thermometers put such checks at risk of error. (…)

The percentage of U.S. coronavirus cases that were fatal was 2.9% through Monday, according to Johns Hopkins figures. That percentage has decreased as a rapid expansion of testing across the country has detected more mild, moderate or asymptomatic cases. Still, the number of deaths per 100,000 Americans has risen to nearly 61, up from 39 in early July.

Mexico has the highest case-fatality rate at 10.5%, according to Johns Hopkins’s analysis of its data, followed by France at 6.7% and Bolivia at 5.8%. Brazil, India and Mexico have the highest total numbers of fatalities after the U.S. (…)

Spain ready to take further action to fight Madrid’s second Covid wave Pedro Sánchez willing to reactivate emergency powers used during first lockdown

New cases in Spain and France are above their spring levels. Th U.K., Canada, Italy and Germany seem to be rising to the same challenge. The U.S. is the top yellow line in the center, having never declined below its spring peak levels and showing signs of joining Spain’s and France’s trends.

coronavirus-data-explorer (21)

Much different trends in developed Asia and Oceania countries, and at much lower levels.

coronavirus-data-explorer (22)

Deaths?coronavirus-data-explorer (23)

Pointing up Axios-Ipsos poll: America turns against vaccine

Data: Axios/Ipsos surveys. 1,100 U.S adults surveyed Aug. 28-31; 1,008 U.S. adults surveyed Sept. 18-21. Chart: Axios Visuals

This is stunning, and a huge problem: The share of Americans who say they’ll try a first-generation coronavirus vaccine is plummeting, White House editor Margaret Talev writes from the new Axios-Ipsos Coronavirus Index.

  • The trend is true among both Democrats and Republicans.

As the U.S. nears the milestone of 200,000 deaths, this shows the risk of politicizing the virus and its treatments. It’s another warning of the difficulties health authorities will face in convincing enough Americans that a vaccine is safe and effective.

Many respondents in Week 25 of our national survey feel a vaccine will be risky. Only half are prepared to pay out of pocket for it.

  • Just 13% say they’d be willing to try it immediately.

Men remain more likely than women to take the first-generation vaccine.

  • Black Americans are about half as likely as Hispanics or whites to take it.
Laid-Off Workers Cut Spending as Extra Unemployment Benefits Run Out President Trump’s action last month put in place an extra $300 in benefits a week, but those benefits will last only six weeks. Congress, meanwhile, has yet to reach an agreement on a new federal jobless benefit.

(…) She said the $600-a-week benefit gave her a sufficient financial cushion to ride out the pandemic, allowing her to save around $1,200. Now that it has expired, her feeling of anxiety is growing. “All of this is scary,” she said. (…)

Many workers are still waiting for the additional $300 payments to arrive, which means they are drawing solely on regular state unemployment benefits, which have averaged $326 a week in the year through July, according to the Labor Department.

Peter Ganong, a University of Chicago economist, said the $300 supplemental benefit would put about 48% of workers above their previous income levels. Under the $600 supplement, about 76% of workers eligible for benefits were making more than their previous income, Mr. Ganong and other University of Chicago researchers estimated. (…)

Economists expect the benefit reduction to dent consumer spending in the coming months. Nearly half of economists in a Wall Street Journal survey expected the lower jobless benefits to hurt spending in September. (…)

The Small Business Pulse survey by the U.S. Census Bureau reveals that as of September 12, more than 75% of small businesses were moderately (44%) or importantly (31%) negatively impacted by the pandemic. This is down from 82.7% in June but still 3 out of 4 small biz owners suffering.

Trump administration rushes to make it tougher for skilled foreign workers to gain H-1B visas

CBO Downgrades Long-Term Projections of Economic Growth Agency says U.S. GDP growth will average 1.6% over next 30 years, vs. 1.9% projected in 2019

Growth averaged 2.5% from 1990 to 2019. Debt as a share of gross domestic product is forecast to hit 195% by 2050, 45 percentage points higher than the CBO projected in June 2019. (…)

The projections released Monday are an extension of 10-year forecasts the CBO released over the summer, showing debt as a share of annual economic output is on track to hit 100% next year and reach 108.9% by the end of the next decade, the highest since World War II. (…)

Federal spending is projected to rise from 21% of GDP in 2020 to 31% by 2050, driven in large part by the soaring cost of servicing the nation’s debt. The aging population and rising health-care costs are also expected to continue pushing up spending on Social Security and Medicare over the next three decades, even after the effects of pandemic spending dissipate. (…)

In The Day After, I showed the close link between growth in GDP and corporate profits and between nominal GDP, business sales and S&P 500 earnings.

If real GDP growth is set to slow below 1.5% per year, from 2.3% in the last cycle, and if inflation slows to the 1.0% range (from +1.7%), then nominal GDP growth will be around 2.5% during the cycle post-pandemic. That would mean business sales growth will slow from 4.0% per year between 2010 and 2019 to about 2.5% post-pandemic.

Ed Yardeni links business sales growth to S&P 500 revenue growth. Overall, but particularly since 2003, both series trend very similarly.

image

Unless one sees S&P 500 profit margins rise in the coming cycle, a rather heroic assumption, investors are in for a long period of very slow profit growth. (…)

Even more so if corporate taxes rise.

EQUITIES

Nervous markets! Different markets yesterday: DJIA -1.8%, SP500 -1.2% and SP600 -3.4% (liquidity seeking?), NDX +1.4%.

Following my yesterday comments and charts on banks:
Banks Still Are Too Weak and Risky, Kashkari Says Minneapolis Fed head, decrying two bailouts in 12 years, says lenders need more equity capital to buffer against tough times.

(…) ”Large, unacceptable risks remain,” Kashkari told a virtual conference hosted by the Council of Institutional Investors (CII) Friday.

He ought to know. In 2008, as a high-ranking official in the US Treasury Department, he oversaw the Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP, which purchased toxic mortgages and other bum real estate assets from financial institutions. “How can it possibly be this fragile?” he asked the conference.

The regional Fed chief said it was “absurd” that Washington had to bail out the banks twice in less than 20 years. He noted that the big lenders have “enormous influence on Capitol Hill.” Kashkari called on pension funds and other big institutions to use their influence with banks to make themselves safer.

Following the 2008-09 crisis, banks faced the new Dodd-Frank law and other restrictions on their behavior—chiefly a requirement that they boost their equity capital, so they would have a bigger buffer during the next downturn. And, indeed, large banks almost doubled equity capital, to the current 13% of risk-weighted assets. But Kashkari said his regional Fed bank calculated that they should be at least at 24%.

The big banks complain that such rules make them less competitive and harm their ability to make loans. Lending, of course, benefits economic growth. Kashkari, however, said the lending-constraints argument was ridiculous because the lenders have robust stock buyback programs, designed to buck up share prices. “If capital was constraining lending,” he asked, “why were they buying back their stock? It is nonsense.”

The last crisis saw the Fed pumping billions into the banking system. And the central bank did it again in recent months, he said, by backstopping banks when the repurchase (aka repo) market froze—the arrangement where banks borrow overnight to gain a small but helpful return. “I keep asking myself,” he said, “what kind of absurd financial system do we have that requires the central bank to bail it out every decade?”

Hasn’t Washington policy “masked weakness” in the economic system, asked Ash Williams, who chairs CII’s board and is the CIO of the Florida State Board of Administration, which oversees the state pension fund. Williams, who moderated Kashkari’s talk, pointed out that programs such as the Paycheck Protection Plan (PPP) subsidized businesses but underlying vulnerabilities remained. “Isn’t there are disconnect between the real economy and financial institutions?” he asked.

Kashkari agreed and warned that, if the coronavirus lasted another year or more, ”there will be a lot more pain.”