The enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it’s the illusion of knowledge (Stephen Hawking)

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so (Mark Twain)

Invest with smart knowledge and objective odds

THE DAILY EDGE: 24 MARCH 2021: Time for Bonds?

FLASH PMIs

Eurozone economy returns to growth for first time in six months

Eurozone business activity returned to growth in March, fueled by a survey record increase in manufacturing output as global demand continued to revive from the pandemic. The service sector was again hit by virus-related restrictions, though even here the decline was the weakest since last August. Hiring picked up as firms boosted capacity in line with fuller order books and optimism about the year ahead. Sentiment was tarnished, however, by concerns over rising virus infection rates.

March also saw firms’ costs rise at the fastest rate for a decade, pushing prices charged for both goods and services higher during the month. Goods prices rose especially markedly, posting the largest rise for almost ten years, often linked to suppliers hiking prices amid record supply chain delays as shortages worsened.

The headline IHS Markit Eurozone Composite PMI® rose from 48.8 in February to 52.5 in March, according to the preliminary ‘flash’ reading. By rising above 50.0, the latest reading indicated the first increase in business activity since last September, with the current expansion the largest recorded since last July and the second-steepest seen over the past 28 months.

image

Divergent trends were seen by sector. While manufacturing output growth accelerated sharply to the highest since data were first available in 1997, the service sector continued to be constrained by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, with social distancing restrictions leading to a seventh successive monthly fall in business activity.

The rate of contraction in the service sector nevertheless moderated to the slowest seen over this period, thanks to spill-over benefits from strong manufacturing growth, a modest easing of virus containment measures and encouraging prospects for the year ahead.

The manufacturing upturn was led by a record surge of factory production in Germany, accompanied by the fastest production growth since January 2018 in both France and the rest of the region as a whole.

image

Germany also outshone in terms of service sector performance, recording the first (albeit modest) expansion of activity for six months while France and the rest of the euro area merely saw rates of contraction moderate.

Looking at growth over both sectors combined, Germany’s resulting upturn was the strongest for just over three years (the composite PMI rising from 51.1 to 56.8), contrasting with a decline in France for the seventh successive month (albeit with the index at 49.5, up from 47.0 in February). The rest of the region saw a modest return to growth for the first time since last July (composite index at 50.6 versus 48.2 in February).

imageInflows of new business also returned to growth over the eurozone as a whole, increasing to the greatest extent since last July. Export orders rose especially sharply, rising at a pace rarely exceeded in the survey’s history due largely to an unprecedented increase in manufacturing, in turn led by a record rise in Germany.

The upturn in order book inflows caused backlogs of work to rise for the first time in 28 months, growing especially sharply in Germany.

Companies responded to the accumulation of uncompleted orders with a second successive month of net hiring, with employment growing at the steepest pace since November 2019.

Manufacturers saw headcounts rise at a rate not seen since August 2018 while a far more modest rate of job creation was seen in the service sector, although even here the rise was the largest since the onset of the pandemic.

France reported the highest rate of job creation, with jobs growth at the steepest since October 2018, while Germany reported the largest payroll gain since June 2019. Job losses meanwhile eased in the rest of the region to the lowest since the pandemic started.

Job creation was also supported by business expectations for the year ahead remaining elevated, although optimism waned slightly from February’s three-year high due in part to concerns over a third wave of virus infections.

The return to growth was accompanied by a further increase in price pressures. Average prices charged for goods and services rose to a degree not seen since January 2019, with goods prices rising particularly steeply, posting the largest gain for almost a decade. Prices rose far more modestly in the service sector, yet the increase was notable in being the first since the pandemic began.

Higher charges often reflected rising costs. Average input prices across both manufacturing and services rose in March at the sharpest rate for a decade. Factory input cost inflation struck the highest since March 2011, often linked to supply shortages. March saw supplier delivery times lengthen to the greatest extent in the survey’s 23-year history. However, service sector input costs also grew sharply, rising at the fastest pace since February of last year. Higher costs were observed across the board, with Germany reporting the steepest increases.

Japan: Downturn in private sector activity persists in March

At 52.0 in March, the headline au Jibun Bank Japan Manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index™ (PMI)® rose from 51.4 in February to signal a quicker improvement in operating conditions. Although output growth softened slightly, new order volumes expanded at the fastest pace since October 2018. That said, manufacturers remained reluctant to take on additional staff, as job shedding continued for a third consecutive month. Moreover, positive sentiment eased in March, with the level of optimism the softest for nine months.

The au Jibun Bank Flash Japan Services Business Activity Index rose from 46.3 in February to 46.5 in March, indicating a softer deterioration in the services sector. New business inflows reduced at the softest pace since October 2020, amid ongoing restrictions on movement. Positively, the pace of job creation quickened in March and was the fastest for 22 months. Firms also remained confident that activity would increase over the next 12 months, despite optimism dipping slightly in comparison to February.

image

HOUSING

Harsh winter weather throughout the country kept many potential home buyers indoors last month. Sales of new single-family homes declined 18.2% (+8.2% y/y) during February to 775,000 units from 948,000 in January, revised from 923,000. Earlier figures also were revised. The Action Economics Forecast Survey expected 879,000 sales in February.

Sales fell throughout the country. Midwest sales dropped 37.5% (+4.9% y/y) to 85,000, the lowest level since last June. In the West, sales weakened 16.4% (-8.1% y/y) to 194,000, down from last October’s high of 277.000. Sales in South were off 14.7% (+20.2% y/y) to 458,000. Falling by 11.6% both m/m and y/y were sales in the Northeast to 38,000 [-11.6% y/y], well below a June 2020 high of 52,000.

The median price of a new home fell 1.1% (+5.3% y/y) in February to $349,400. Working 1.4% higher (7.7% y/y) to $416,000 was the average price of a new home. These prices are not seasonally adjusted.

The supply of new homes for sale in February rose to 4.8 months, up from 3.5 months in October. The median number of months a new home stayed on the market after completion declined to 3.2, after surging to 4.5 months in both August and September of last year.

image

The South (blue) remains THE growth area: February new home sales were 5% above their 2019-2020 average. Excluding the South (black), February sales were back to their flat trend line. New home sales in the West are down 8.1% YoY, 2.5% below their 2019-2020 average.

image

Existing-home sales fell 6.6% in February from the previous month, but sales are still 9.1% higher than last year, per the National Association of Realtors. While the South remains the clear growth leader, existing home sales are up in every region YoY in February.

image

Declining affordability remains the problem for the lower income segment of the population.

fredgraph - 2021-03-23T134439.674

These people are more likely to shop for used houses given that the median price of newly built houses is $349k while the median existing-home sales price is $313,000, 15.8% higher than in February 2020, with all regions posting double-digit price gains.

But existing housing inventory in February fell to a record low of 1.03 million units, down by 29.5% YoY — the fastest decline on record.

The NAR says that properties typically sold in 20 days, also a record, and homes with price tags between $250,000 and $500,000 were on the market for just 14 days.

  • ING says that housing will be a major GDP growth driver in 2021.

The recovery in the housing market has led a turnaround in the construction sector as the left-hand chart below shows. The National Association of Home Builders reports that sentiment remains close to all-time highs (it has a 36-year history) with construction employment having risen by 805,000 since April and with housing starts hitting a 14-year high in December.

With home prices well supported by decent demand amidst a dearth of supply this should incentivise more construction activity despite the higher costs for building materials, such as lumber and steel. Consequently, residential investment is likely to continue making a strong contribution to GDP growth this year.

A strong housing market also boosts demand elsewhere in the economy. Housing activity is strongly correlated to retail sales – as people move to a new home they typically spend money on new furniture and home furnishings, garden equipment and building supplies such as a new paint job and a bit of home improvement. It also results in demand for moving services while generating legal and mortgage fees within the service sector, which should also all help boost economic activity through this year.

Construction spending & residential investment (YoY%)  Source: Macrobond, ING

Source: Macrobond, ING

The downside from all this is that higher housing costs will feed through into higher consumer price inflation. As the chart below shows, the rent of primary residence CPI component (7.8% of the CPI basket by weight) and owners’ equivalent rent of residences (24.2% of the CPI basket by weight) typically lag turning points in the S&P Case Schiller house price series by around 14 months.

The chart suggests that housing will soon be contributing positively to US inflation readings, which given housing’s combined CPI weighting of 32% is a key reason why we believe that inflation will stay higher for longer than the Federal Reserve thinks.

Surging house prices to push consumer price inflation higher

 Source: Macrobond, ING

Source: Macrobond, ING

MORE SUPPLY PROBLEMS

  • Auto Dealerships Face Inventory Squeeze The car industry entered 2021 hoping to restock, but supply-chain problems are extending the crunch—meaning slimmer pickings, higher prices and longer waits.

(…) The lack of new cars stands as a barrier to what could be a strong bounceback year for the industry. (…)

A monthslong shortage of semiconductors has forced auto makers to cut production of even their most-lucrative vehicles. Winter storms in Texas last month disrupted plastics production, leading to shortages of seat foam and other materials, car makers and suppliers have said. A backup at West Coast ports is delaying vehicle-part shipments from Asia. (…)

At the end of February, dealers had 2.7 million vehicles in stock or being shipped to stores, a 26% drop from the same month last year, according to Wards Intelligence. (…)

Car companies on average spent about $3,562 per vehicle on discounts and other sales incentives in February, a $600 drop from the same month a year earlier, according to research firm J.D. Power. (…)

GM has said the lost production could hurt pretax profit by as much as $2 billion this year; Ford pegged the hit at up to $2.5 billion. (…)

(…) That marks a 30% increase over this time last year, when the pandemic’s lockdowns slammed fuel usage. (…)

Supporting gasoline’s climb is a rebound in crude-oil prices and a big drop in the amount in storage. The price of West Texas Intermediate crude has advanced by more than 60% since the end of October to $57.76 a barrel Tuesday, even after a recent tumble. Crude accounts for 56 cents of every dollar consumers spend on gasoline, according to the Energy Information Administration.

Refiners throttled back output last year in response to lower prices and weak demand. The winter freeze that struck Texas in February then knocked some of the nation’s biggest out of action. The combination dragged stocks of motor gasoline below normal levels for March. (…)

  • LDPE plastic film is used for dry cleaner bags, bread bags, paper towel overwrap, and shipping sacks. LLDPE is used for plastic wrap, stretch wrap, pouches, toys, covers, lids, pipes, buckets, containers, cables, geomembranes, and flexible tubing.

This last one is surely transitory…

Meanwhile, demand is rising sharply as Americans receive their new stimmies as Chase’s Spending Tracker reveals:

image

From Bank of America’s own card spending data: “Just as initial stimulus payments started arriving, spending on athletic footwear and apparel jumped over 19% from the prior year. (via Axios)

Even though confidence remains low:

So far, pent up wins over spent up.

Powell Says Stimulus Package Isn’t Likely to Fuel Unwelcome Inflation “We might see some upward pressure on prices. Our best view is that the effect on inflation will be neither particularly large nor persistent,” he said, reiterating comments he has made repeatedly since the measure was enacted earlier this month.

(…) Ms. Yellen said President Biden’s post-pandemic plans will likely need to be paid for with tax increases, such as returning the corporate tax rate to 28%. But she said those changes wouldn’t come until the pandemic is over and would ultimately help the economy. (…)

But there’s more stimulus seemingly coming:

(…) The first proposal would center on roads, bridges and other infrastructure projects and include many of the climate-change initiatives Mr. Biden outlined in the “Build Back Better” plan he released during the 2020 campaign.

That package would be followed by measures focusing on education and other priorities, including extending the newly expanded child tax credit scheduled to expire at the end of the year and providing for universal prekindergarten and tuition-free community college, the people said.

The packages could face a difficult path through the narrowly divided Congress, and Democrats aren’t all in agreement on how they should move forward with their spending and tax proposals. Mr. Biden is expected to be briefed on the details of the proposals this week, and the people warned that the strategy is preliminary. Mr. Biden would need to sign off on the legislative strategy for it to move forward. (…)

If the proposals add up to $3 trillion over a decade, that would represent 1% of GDP and a 5% increase in federal spending beyond current projections.

Democrats are also exploring raising the top marginal income-tax rate for high-income individuals, increasing capital-gains taxes and tightening international tax rules on companies, according to lawmakers and aides. Sen. Ron Wyden (D., Ore.), the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, is expected to detail more international-tax proposals soon. (…)

How Not to Panic About Inflation Remember the lessons of the 2010-2011 scare.

Paul Krugman is “betting” it’s all transitory, making no distinction between monetary stimulus (post 2009) and direct-to-consumer fiscal stimulus.

(…) The key thing to understand is that there are really two kinds of inflation.

The prices of some goods, like oil and soybeans, fluctuate all the time, changing day by day or even minute by minute in response to changes in supply and demand. Inflation in these goods is easy come, easy go; prices may soar quickly when demand is high or supply is tight, but they can plunge just as quickly when market conditions change.

Many other prices, however — including the prices of labor, that is, wages and salaries — change much less frequently. Most workers’ wage rates are adjusted just once a year.

And stagflation, it turns out, mainly involves these “sticky” prices. (…)

So what’s going to happen in the months ahead? We’ll probably see a number of transitory price increases, not just because the economy is booming, but also because the lingering effects of the pandemic have produced some unusual disruptions — for example, a global shortage of shipping containers.

The question will be whether these price increases are a 2010-2011-type blip or something more dangerous. Smart observers will look past the headlines to measures of underlying inflation — not just the Fed’s standard “core” measure but things like the Atlanta Fed’s sticky price index as well. Anecdotal evidence, otherwise known as “talking to people,” will also be important: Are businesses actually starting to set prices and wages based on the expectation of high future inflation?

If they aren’t — and my bet is that they won’t be — then the lesson of 2010-2011 will remain: Don’t panic.

Now as then there are people eager to denounce government attempts to help the economy. And it’s certainly possible that the American Rescue Plan will turn out, in retrospect, to have been too much of a good thing. But don’t let the usual suspects seize on a few months’ inflation data as evidence of looming disaster.

David Rosenberg, rarely in agreement with Krugman, presents the bullish view on bonds:

The future is one of frugality, and not frivolity. This will be the “Boring Twenties,”not the “Roaring Twenties.”The longer end of the Treasury market has peak inflation and peak Fed tightening priced in, and is supremely oversold. Enough said.This week’s Treasury auctions will be a critical test.

  • Sentiment is at its low:

image

  • “Bond yields have always peaked out and rolled over at these levels.” Like Ronald Reagan, I trust but verify: the red dots are approximately where sentiment bottomed above. Rosie is right!

image

ZeroHedge adds a trading angle to this “worst in decades bloodbath”:

This almost unprecedented carnage has strategists predicting large quarter-end rebalancing flows out of equities and into Treasuries. Bank of America strategists estimated that $88.5 billion could shift into U.S. fixed income, including $41 billion into Treasuries.

And we do now know who the most recent marginal seller was.

Since the start of the year, 85% of the cumulative decline in TY futures prices occurred in the overnight session, i.e., Japan is almost single-handedly responsible for the dump surge in yields this year! (…)

Hornbach writes that “we have good reason to believe the selling from Japan won’t last… into April.” That’s because the fiscal year in Japan ends on March 31.

Source: Bloomberg

Source: Bloomberg

Scott Minerd, Global CIO, Guggenheim Investments offers yet another angle:

(…) The question investors face is whether the selloff has more room to run. Our analysis suggests it has largely run its course. The market is now pricing in a neutral rate of 2.35 percent, nearly in line with the Fed’s optimistic long run dots. The chart below shows that the bond market has had difficulty sustaining rates at or near the Fed’s neutral rate projection, and we see no reason to expect a different result this time. Nor do we expect the Fed to revise up its neutral rate estimate.

The Fed’s Optimistic Neutral Rate Projection Is Almost Fully Priced In

3-Month Annualized Rate of Change

Source: Guggenheim Investments, Bloomberg. Data as of 03.19.2021. FOMC neutral rate projection is the median “Longer Run” dot from the Summary of Economic Projections. Market neutral rate projection is the 5-year forward 5-year Overnight Index Swap rate. Fed Funds Rate is depicted using the interest rate on excess reserves.

But is oversold really bullish? From SentimenTrader:

High five “Oversold” doesn’t always mean “buy” and this seemed to be the case here.

When the contract first fell more than 8% below its 100-day average, it tended to lose even more ground over the next 2 months. The 10 prior signals did not provide a consistent signal that mean-reversion was about to rear its head.

And economic surprises remain good so far per Citigroup (via Ed Yardeni):

image

And if the economy grows 4% or more in nominal terms, and 10Y Ts yield range between 0% and 2.5% below nominal GDP growth rate like they have for the last 20 years, the yield range is 1.5% to 4.0%.

fredgraph - 2021-03-24T073358.733

In fact, Nordea’s models suggest 2.0-3.0%:

US 10-year should be heading to 2% …

… or higher if other markets are consulted

Nordea to Krugman:

It is important to understand that the slump of 2020 was a disease-driven supply shock and not a recession where economic imbalances got laid bare as central banks tightened policy by hiking rates. From a macro perspective, 2020 was nothing like the financial crisis, after which it took 10 years to close the output gaps created by the crisis. This time, as soon as the root cause of the supply shock is cured, which will be very soon, the economies can be expected to get back to the starting point very quickly.

The US output gap

I think this also will be true when it comes to the labour market. Central banks are currently clearly worried that it will take a long time before that happens. Interestingly, the share of US small businesses that have job openings is at an all-time high, something that historically has meant rapidly dropping unemployment numbers.

Unemployment should drop fast

(…) It has basically never happened before that the world exits a recession with a huge pile of cash in households’ hands. This was true already before Biden’s new stimulus checks. It is thus not only reasonable to believe that output gaps will close quickly, but also that we could see the most positive output gaps for decades.

A huge pile of cash to spend

25% of U.S. Has Received a Shot

(…) The glacial speed of vaccination programs in many parts of the Asia-Pacific will mean social distancing and travel bans deep into the second half of 2021—and potentially beyond. Currently, China has deployed fewer than six vaccine doses per 100 people, according to Our World in Data, compared with the U.S. figure of 38 and the European Union’s 13. Developed economies in the region trail even further behind: South Korea, Japan and Australia have each deployed fewer than two doses per 100 people. (…)

THE DAILY EDGE: 11 JANUARY 2021: Tesla Now Has Company

Seven Months of Jobs Growth Halted Economy lost 140,000 jobs in December while unemployment rate held at 6.7%

(…) Restaurants and bars drove last month’s decline. Forced to close or scale down because of the virus and cold weather, they cut 372,000 jobs. Other industries highly vulnerable to the spread of virus—hotels, museums, tourist sites—laid off workers, as did government agencies and schools. (…) Factories added 38,000 jobs last month, responding to higher demand for goods as households shift from spending money on vacations and other services to buying sofas, cars and other products. (…) But manufacturing represents only about 14% of the labor market. (…) State and local government employment fell by 51,000. (…)

Most other sectors added jobs last month, but the gains weren’t enough to offset the sharp decline in areas sensitive to the state of the pandemic. (…)

The pandemic and related restrictions led to 22 million job losses in March and April; about 12 million have been recovered since then.

President-elect Joe Biden on Friday said next week he would be “laying out the groundwork” for trillions of dollars in new relief. Democrats will control the White House and both chambers of Congress later in January. (…)

He also said he would seek to increase the federal minimum wage to at least $15 an hour, calling on Congress to pass the measure. (…)

The Payrolls Index (employment x hours x wages) rose 0.4% in December after 0.7% in November and 0.8% in October. This is a 7.8% annualized rate in Q4. Aggregate payrolls are now down 0.3% YoY and 1.4% lower than last February, the high watermark.

fredgraph - 2021-01-09T071452.496

  • Payrolls were revised up 135,000 for October and November.
  • Private employment is down 6.2% YoY in December (-6.5% vs February), slightly worse than November’s -6.0%. Hours worked are up 1.2% YoY.
  • Goods-Producing employment declined 853k (-4.0%) between February and December (manufacturing -543k or -4.2%) but has been rising MoM (+5.7% a.r. in Q4).
  • Services-Providers shed 9 million employees (-6.8%) since February but have recovered 10.6 million of the 19.7 million lost by April.

There are encouraging signs but we are not out of the woods yet.

In the week that included the pay period the Labor Department’s jobs survey is based upon, there were 1.49 million newly reported Covid cases and 16,673 deaths, according to Johns Hopkins University, versus 1 million cases and 7,608 deaths during the same week in October. Over the seven days ended Thursday, there were 1.6 million new cases and 19,349 deaths, and there is a risk that the wave has yet to crest.

Canada’s labour recovery stalls, with more pain expected

The country lost a net 62,600 jobs in December, the first decline since April, Statistics Canada said Friday. The unemployment rate edged up to 8.6 per cent from November’s 8.5 per cent. With December’s backslide, about 636,000 fewer people are employed than in February, before COVID-19 escalated in Canada and damaged the job market. (…)

Employment fell again in both accommodation and food services (56,700) and culture and recreation (18,800). (…)

Conversely, there were also points of strength. Full-time jobs climbed by 36,500 in December, while a number of industries – such as manufacturing (15,400), professional services (16,800) and public administration (13,700) – registered hefty gains of their own. (…)

U.S. Consumer Credit Accelerates During November

Consumer credit outstanding increased $15.3 billion during November (0.3% y/y) following a $4.5 billion October rise, revised from $7.2 billion. A $9.0 billion increase had been expected by the Action Economics Forecast Survey.

Nonrevolving credit usage jumped $16.1 billion (4.0% y/y) following a $10.0 billion September gain, revised from $12.7 billion. Federal government borrowing, which issues over 40% of nonrevolving credit, grew 5.0% y/y. Depository institution loans (29% of credit) grew a greatly lessened 2.5% y/y, down from 6.8% y/y growth as of December 2019. Finance company borrowing (16.0% of loans) firmed 4.3% y/y and credit union loans (14.0% of the total) increased 4.2% y/y.

Revolving consumer credit balances eased $0.8 billion (-10.0% y/y) following unrevised $5.5 billion October decline. It was the eighth decline in the last nine months, which included double-digit balance pay-downs this spring. Credit provided by depository institutions (90% of the total and mostly credit card debt), dropped 10.0% y/y. Credit union borrowing fell 4.8% y/y and finance company loans fell roughly one-quarter y/y.

 image    image

Long-Term Bonds Hit Hard After Georgia Senate Runoffs Democratic victories in the Georgia Senate races this week have spurred investors to bet on a higher spending government that will bring growth and inflation to the U.S. economy.

The 30-year Treasury yield has jumped by almost one-quarter of 1 percentage point since the start of the year to settle at 1.863% on Friday, according to Tradeweb. That is the highest yield since late February apart from one day in mid-March last year, when Treasury markets were gripped by the dash for cash at the onset of the Covid crisis.

The 10-year Treasury yield has also risen, breaching the 1% level for the first time also since the market dysfunction in March. (…)

The 10-year break-even rate rose above 2% this week for the first time since 2018. The 30-year break-even rate also rose above 2% this week for the first time since April 2019. (…)

(…) These moves come when Fed policy has continuously sought to repress yields substantially and keep them in a tight trading band. Should the moves continue, they would also challenge some of the strong drivers of funds into equities and other risk assets by reducing their relative attractiveness and by weakening the buy signals issued by models incorporating the discounting of future cash flows. Moreover, their persistence would be concerning for the economic outlook because of their underlying drivers and the potential impact on sectors sensitive to interest rates such as housing. (…)

The Democratic sweep of the two Georgia Senate runoff elections last week has increased the prospect of higher government budget deficits and much more debt financing. But with the Fed not only committed to maintaining its large-scale asset purchases but also open to increasing it and shifting more of the purchases to longer-dated securities, such a prospect should not have an immediate significant impact on yields.

The most likely drivers, then, are expectations for higher inflation and more hesitancy on the part of Treasury buyers. The former is supported by moves in inflation break-evens and other inflation-sensitive market segments. The latter is consistent with the considerable market chatter about how government bonds, being so highly repressed by the Fed and facing an asymmetrical outlook for yield moves, are no longer ideal for mitigating risk. (…)

The most dominant market view at the moment, and it is quasi universal, is that stocks and other risk assets will continue to rise because of the abundant liquidity injections coming from central banks and the allocation of more private funds. After all, central banks show no inclination of moderating their huge stimulus. And investors remain strongly conditioned by a powerful mix that has served them extremely well so far: TINA (there is no alternative to stocks) fueling BTD (buy the dip) behavior in response to even the smallest market selloffs, especially given FOMO (the fear of missing out on the recurrence of impressive market rallies).

As valid as these considerations are at this moment of time, they also warrant a close monitoring of the yield curve for U.S. government bonds. A significant continuation of recent trends would challenge the Fed, investors and the economy.

fredgraph - 2021-01-11T064138.960

Stock market exuberance is here to stay, Credit Suisse says. Here’s why investors can be positive

(…) They said three key important components — the put-call ratio, the bull-bear ratio and risk appetite — were slightly extended but “not at sell signals.”

“Bullish sentiment is high but at these levels markets continue to rise two-thirds of the time over the next month and we think the bullish sentiment is not reflected in retail or institutional position — indeed net speculative longs on the S&P are below average,” they said.

The strategists’ only worry was that 80% of stocks currently sit above their 200-day moving average, which would typically see markets fall two-thirds of the time over the next month. However, they said: “But in the very early cycle, as we are, this is not a short-term sell signal.

“We think a Democratic clean sweep and the vaccine rollout underpin 5% global GDP growth this year.”

Beyond the near term, there were a number of strategic reasons to stay positive, they said, including “ultraloose” policy and an additional U.S. fiscal boost of close to 2% of gross domestic product. They also saw the start of a bond-to-equity switch, as institutions start to realize that bonds are becoming increasingly less diversifying, return-less risk. Excess liquidity was also consistent with a further rerating and earnings revisions were supportive, the analysts added.

Finally, there was the potential for a “funds-flow squeeze,” with corporate buying of stocks accelerating and retail buying having returned, while pension funds — with low equities weightings in Europe and neutral weightings in the U.S. — wouldn’t be sellers.

My favorite technical analysis firm continues to see “clear evidence” of high Demand intensity, reaching even the very weakest of stocks and argues that this bull is younger and more powerful than many believe.

EARNINGS WATCH

For those who still care about that, the Q4’20 earnings season begins Friday but we already have 18 reports in: the beat rate is 100% and the surprise factor +13.1% to +21.6%. Revenues beat by +3.0% to +9.7%.

Revisions are still up:

image

image

image

U.S. bank quarterly profits expected to fall again from pre-COVID levels When the biggest U.S. banks begin reporting fourth-quarter results on Friday some of the headlines could show profits plunged by as much as 40% from a year earlier, before the pandemic struck. (…) From those low points, banks could see profits more than double in first and second quarters of 2021, according to Refinitiv’s IBES estimates. (…)
Light bulb ISM Manufacturing vs SOX: The trend is your friend.

image

Call me TikTok and Discord Are the New Wall Street Trading Desks Pandemic has led to surge of day trading, helping push stocks like NIO and Tesla to records amid online buzz

(…) These investors do more than just talk, though. They piggyback on each others’ ideas and trades, helping fuel the momentum that has propelled some companies to triple-digit or bigger gains in 2020. (…)

And while online discussions among investors aren’t necessarily new—in the late 1990s internet chat rooms dedicated to stocks helped sustain the tech-stock bubble—social media is more widespread than ever before. (…)

Gavin Mayo, a 19-year-old student at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, says he typically spends anywhere from one to five hours a day scrolling TikTok, YouTube and other platforms for ideas on what to trade while churning out video snippets to more than 60,000 of his TikTok followers. (…)

As of January, posts tied to #stockmarket had garnered over 800 million views on TikTok, more than triple the figure in June. Reddit’s infamous WallStreetBets forum has more than doubled in subscribers since the start of 2020. StockTwits, a social network focused on investing and trading, has seen its user numbers more than triple over the past year. (…)

“We’re in a bull run until we’re not.” (…)

China hits out at US move to elevate relations with Taiwan Washington’s decision to abandon internal protocols governing diplomacy sparks anger
U.S. Weighs Adding Alibaba, Tencent to Stock Ban
Data Update 1 for 2021: A (Data) Look Back at a Most Forgettable Year (2020)! Aswath Damodaran is a Professor of Finance at the Stern School of Business at NYU. Very valuable work FYI.
COVID-19

It may have felt like a lot longer, but today’s the first anniversary of the first reported coronavirus death in Wuhan, China. Nearly 2 million people have been taken by COVID-19 since then. International experts investigating the pandemic’s origins will finally arrive in China on Thursday, after being blocked by the Chinese authorities, who now say it was a “misunderstanding.” Fortune

0_All Key Metrics (48)

Still strongly correlated:8_US Cross Curves (28)

8_US Cross Curves (29)

Watch the NE where cases are really accelerating from a comparatively low level. New York state cases reached 18,832 last Friday from 11,000 in mid-December.

image

More than 22 million doses had been distributed to states and other jurisdictions as of Friday, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, while 6.7 million people had received their first shot by that point. The figures were short of the U.S. goal of 20 million vaccinations by the end of 2020, and communities and states were still reporting bottlenecks this month as they managed their inoculation programs. (Bloomberg)

Goldman Sachs noted the slow vaccination start:

(…) we have adjusted our US, UK, Euro Area, and Japan growth forecasts over the past week. We now expect DM quarterly annualized GDP growth of 2.0% in Q1 (vs. 4.2% a week ago), 9.6% in Q2 (vs. 9.8%), 7.9% in Q3 (vs. 6.3%), and 5.1% in Q4 (vs. 4.7%). (…)

Building in a slower start but a steeper ramp-up in the spring, we still expect large shares of DM vulnerable groups to receive their first dose around the end of Q1 and a majority of the population to receive their first dose by midyear. The point at which 50% of the population has received their first dose looks likely to be April for the UK, May for the US, June for the EU and Canada, July for Australia, and August for Japan. (…)

We find that risks to our timelines from distribution remain mostly to the downside with benefits from higher distributional capacity limited by vaccine supply and demand.

China Allows WHO Experts in to Investigate Covid-19 Origins China has agreed to allow a team of World Health Organization experts to enter the country to investigate the origins of the coronavirus pandemic, days after the United Nations agency’s top official criticized Beijing for holding up the mission.
John Authers: Tesla’s Absurdity Amplifies the Tech Bubble Echoes

(…) No company during the tech bubble increased its market value by as much as Tesla did in the last 12 months. Back then, the internet was new and exciting, and a variety of players were beginning to experiment with ways to make money from it. There was plenty of news. Today, the prospects for electric vehicles look good, and Tesla leads the nascent market, but it still has a long way to go, with plenty of well entrenched players. Maybe Tesla’s long-term prospects are better now than those of Cisco and Amazon were when the first bubble came to a head. But any such claim has to rest on conjecture. Lots of  things have broken just right for Amazon, the biggest and best-known specialist internet retailer, over the last two decades, and it has made a lot of great calls. As for Cisco, it continues to be the dominant provider of routers.

Now, let’s take a look at how investors fared if they bought any of those three great companies at their respective tops at the turn of the millennium:

In price terms, Cisco’s investors are still under water. Amazon shareholders had to wait out a decline of more than 90%, and didn’t show a profit on their investment for a decade; since then it has worked out brilliantly. Buyers of Microsoft at the top in 1999 had to wait 15 years to make a profit. And all of these are companies that looked as well established as Tesla does now (Amazon is a partial exception), and which have fulfilled the rosy expectations of them. (…)

Auto TESLA HAS MORE SERIOUS COMPANY

2021 seems like a pivotal year for EVs: many more models, including pickups, and a lot more range. I offer links to some articles, a JP Morgan note on the Mustang Mach-E and a video of a well done comp between Tesla Y and the Mach-E. Only for your general interest or, if you are long TSLA, for your appreciation of the evolving competitive landscape.

I have been driving a Tesla Model 3 for a year, after about 30 years driving Audis and BMWs. The Model 3 is, by far, the best car I have ever had. Extremely comfy, great drive and outstanding software updated over-the-air every 2-3 months. Tesla’s software is unique in that it is all proprietary and totally integrated. No third parties, which makes it uniquely efficient and evolutive, probably Tesla’s most important competitive advantage. Time will tell how significant it remains over time.

We Were Thoroughly Impressed by Our Test Drive of
Ford’s Mustang Mach-E & See Negative Implications
for Tesla Valuation (J.P. Morgan Securities LLC)

(…) Starting with the Mach-E, the vehicle upon first presentation appears very well put together, with the quality materials, fit, and finish (including sheet metal tolerance and interior craftsmanship) befitting of an upscale near-luxury model.

Its design is unique and we believe will appeal to many buyers, particularly as relates to its Mustang-esque styling cues, including sinewy sheet metal, trademark tail lights with sequential signaling, and a rakish side profile more emblematic of a sports coupe than a utility vehicle (while also preserving headroom for rear seat passengers).

On the road, it was fun and exciting to drive. The vehicle offers three driving modes — “Whisper”, “Engage”, and “Unbridled” — each offering a more aggressive throttle response and acceleration time, and a progressively sportier steering feel. The Unbridled mode was most impressive and we believe will delight consumers, particularly those new to the electric vehicle driving experience. (…)

Many reviews are of course comparing the Mach-E to its most obvious competitor, the also very attractive Tesla Model Y. We do not aim to argue that one vehicle is necessarily superior to the other (many consumers will continue to prefer the Model Y’s greater availability of semi-autonomous driving features and Tesla brand, while others will be attracted to the Mach-E’s styling and availability of a $7,500 federal tax credit).

But we do argue that Ford has succeeded in replicating Tesla’s success in creating a compelling battery electric vehicle that is sure to generate consumer pull, enthusiasm, and buzz, given that our driving experience was more akin to that of a Tesla and not at all like that of earlier more pedestrian BEVs such as the Chevrolet Bolt or Nissan Leaf.

And there are many more such vehicles on the way from additional automakers, including desirable German luxury brands. We see three negative implications for Tesla valuation: (1) a growing number of compelling offerings will increasingly compete with Tesla for battery electric sales and share (of course while also growing the overall pie); (2) the sales of these offerings will place downward pressure on the demand from other automakers for Tesla’s valuable Zero Emission Vehicle credits; and — most importantly — (3) as single-digit P/E automakers increasingly roll out similarly attractive battery electric models, we believe it will call into question the perceived paradigm shifting nature of Tesla’s vehicles and business model and, in turn, its industry unique valuation.

Ford is showing more and more signs of becoming a credible contender in battery electric vehicles — and yet while Ford produced 7.6x as many vehicles as Tesla in 2020, Tesla’s market cap is 21.5x greater. Ford is estimated by IHS Automotive to have produced 3.9 mn vehicles in 2020 vs. Tesla 0.5 mn (and 4.9 mn in 2021 vs. Tesla 0.8 mn) although its market capitalization of $36 bn is dwarfed by Tesla’s $774 bn. While we do not expect Ford to rival Tesla for number of battery electric vehicles sold (although Volkswagen, with a $99 bn cap, may), we do expect investors to increasingly take seriously its competitiveness in this area.