The enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it’s the illusion of knowledge (Stephen Hawking)

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so (Mark Twain)

Invest with smart knowledge and objective odds

THE DAILY EDGE (8 May 2017)

U.S. Economy Poised for Spring Rebound as Jobless Rate Falls Hiring increased in April, and the unemployment rate fell to its lowest level in a decade, signs the U.S. economy is picking up speed after a lackluster winter.

(…) The pickup in hiring last month was broad-based, with particularly strong gains in business services and health care. (…)

After seeing the latest numbers, economists at forecasting firm Macroeconomic Advisers increased their projection for second-quarter growth to 4%. (…)

“This is an unambiguously strong economic report and suggests that consumers will have the wherewithal to increase spending in the second quarter,” said David Berson, economist at Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. (…)

The economy has added an average 185,000 jobs a month in 2017, roughly matching 2016’s pace of job creation and a slower pace than in 2014 and 2015. (…)

So far, there is only modest evidence that the low unemployment rate is putting upward pressure on incomes and inflation. (…)

One explanation for why wages haven’t grown even faster is worker productivity has declined so far this year. Low productivity makes it difficult for businesses to generate higher profits, invest and raise workers’ pay.

Another reason could be some underlying slack remaining in the labor market. An alternative measure of unemployment and underemployment, which includes those who have stopped looking and those in part-time jobs who want full-time positions, was 8.6% in April. While the lowest since 2007, it remains slightly elevated above prerecession levels.

But the smaller spread between the alternative measure and the more broadly reported rate suggest that the slack is diminishing.

Softening wage growth could prove temporary, if employers start to struggle to find qualified workers. (…)

(…) That misses one important point. The 4.4% rate looks a lot like a cycle low for unemployment, noted Gluskin Sheff economist David Rosenberg. If 4.4% isn’t the cycle low for unemployment, it’s extremely close to it, and there is one thing that uniformly follows the cycle low in unemployment. “While the cycle-low unemployment rate is obviously going to be rejoiced in the ‘here and now,’ ” Mr. Rosenberg wrote, “history teaches us that six months hence, the expansion ends and the recession begins.” (…)

The jobless rate is a lagging indicator,” he wrote. The leading indicator is Fed policy. With the central bank raising rates, the yield curve will continue to flatten, then invert. “Brace for that,” he wrote. What comes next is inevitable. (…)

“The best time to celebrate,” he wrote, “is when the unemployment hits its cycle-high and (is) poised to come down, because it is that point that both the expansion and bull market has the longest runway,” he said. “We were at that point seven years ago, and have hit the other extreme today.”

Mommy, is this a cycle trough?

image

JOBS MIX KEEP AGGREGATE WAGES LOW

Smart analysis from NBF:

As we had suspected March was just a blip for the U.S. labour market, the latter bouncing back spectacularly as non-farm payrolls grew a consensus-topping 211,000 in April. The breadth of the increase in the goods sector, continued strength in services sector employment and record full-time employment all point to a resilient labour market. The consensus-topping results are consistent with a sharp acceleration of U.S. GDP growth in the current quarter after a soft Q1. The Fed will feel
vindicated about its decision to tighten monetary policy in December and March and will likely pull the trigger again in June, more so with the jobless rate now at a decade low of just 4.4% (ditto for the wide measure which is at just 8.6%).

The only blemish to the employment reports is wage inflation which remains milder than the Fed would have liked ─ hourly earnings were growing at an annual pace of just 2.5% in April. That’s in part because the participation rate has stabilized after several years of decline, with new entrants into the labour force keeping wages under wraps. Moreover, job creation has been largely titled towards sectors with low wage inflation. As today’s Hot Chart shows, sectors that experienced solid employment growth over the past year, including mining/logging and education/health, also had some of the smallest wage gains. But as we’ve seen in recent months, soft wage inflation is not sufficient to prevent tighter monetary policy because the Fed’s broader outlook seems to be giving FOMC members confidence that inflation will eventually pick up as economic growth accelerates.

image

(…) The Federal Reserve’s survey of regional economies last month noted firms are reporting higher turnover rates and more difficulty holding on to workers in industries ranging from hospitality to manufacturing to energy. Construction firms in Memphis, Tenn., and Little Rock, Ark., reported labor shortages caused employers to raise wages to attract employees. (…)

NCGS Inc., a Charleston, S.C., company that runs clinical trials for drug companies, is now reviewing employees’ compensation as frequently as every three months, versus the prior practice of annual reviews.

“You can’t wait to evaluate salaries,” Chief Executive Nancy Snowden said. “That doesn’t exist anymore because there’s so much competition.”

The company is undertaking the largest expansion its 33-year history and doesn’t want to lose critical talent. Average salaries at NCGS are up about 8% from a year ago. In-demand jobs include clinical nurses and regulatory-compliance experts.

(…) For businesses, it is time to think differently about growth and labor costs. Profit growth for big companies in the first quarter was strong despite the sluggish economy because executives kept a tight lid on spending, including on workers. Unless higher labor costs are offset by stronger growth, it could mean that the first quarter marked peak profitability.

Investors have been winners in the long-running battle between capital and labor. That could be changing.

In all, the writing is on the wall: unless the economy really cools off, the labor market is tight enough for wage pressures to intensify in 2017. The Employment Cost Index is now rising at a 3.5% annual rate in Q1 and the number of anecdotes about wage increases are mushrooming by the day.

image

This chart plots unemployment claims divided by the working age population. The pool of available worker has shrunk to the lowest in 40 years.

image

The number of full time workers is only 3.4% above its 2007 peak level but it has been accelerating sharply so far in 2017 (+4.3% a.r. since December 2016). Meanwhile, the real weekly salary of full time workers recouped its 2009 level only in Q1’16 but has also been accelerating since even though it remains only 1.4% above its 2009 level:

image

Accelerating labor costs will be challenging for corporate America’s margins but could keep the economy healthy enough to help top line growth. This payrolls index (hourly earnings X hours X employeds) has also accelerated lately reaching +4.1% YoY in April.

image

Because consumers can’t keep borrowing to sustain spending indefinitely, especially with the Fed firmly on the hiking trail.

Total outstanding credit had increased at a 4.4% rate in February.

Revolving credit outstanding, mostly credit cards, increased at a 2.4% annual pace in March. Nonrevolving credit outstanding, mainly student and auto loans, rose at a 6.2% annual pace. (Charts from Haver Analytics)

 large image large image

Punch Something is not consumer bullish in this Bespoke Investment chart:

credit cards

Canadian Wage Gains Fall to Record Low as Jobs Run Stalls

Canada added 3,200 jobs during the month, Statistics Canada reported in Ottawa, less than the 10,000 employment gain forecast by economists. The pace of annual wage rate increases fell to 0.7 percent in April, the lowest in records dating back to the late 1990s.

Canada’s unemployment rate fell to 6.5 percent, the lowest since October 2008, but this reflects the departure of 45,500 people from the labor force. About half of those were youth, meaning many young people looking for work have stopped looking.

While the number of jobs added was relatively small in April, one-month does not make a trend and the recent employment picture has been strong. The country has had positive job gains for six straight months, and over the past nine months has added 277,000 jobs. That’s the best performance since 2012.

Other positive signs include hours worked numbers that show gains of 1.1 percent over the past 12 months and the falling unemployment rate.

  • Pointing up All the job gains were self-employed and public sector. Canada lost 50,500 jobs in the private sector.

image

Yet, the Canadian economy has outperformed the U.S. in each of the last 3 quarters and 4 of the past 5. Since August 2016, Canada has created an average of 34,200 jobs per month which, population-adjusted, is equivalent to +340k in the U.S..

China’s Trade Surplus Increases in April China’s trade surplus widened in April, though both exports and imports grew less than expected amid signs that global trade momentum may be slipping.

Exports rose 8% from a year earlier compared with 16.4% in March, the General Administration of Customs said Monday. Imports climbed 11.9%, also below forecasts, after a 20.3% rise in March. China’s trade surplus increased to $38.05 billion from $23.93 billion the previous month. (…)

China’s exports to North America, Europe and Japan were up between 7% and 11% year on year in dollar terms in the first four months of 2017. (…)

China remained the world’s largest exporter in 2016 for the eighth consecutive year, accounting for 13% of the global total even as exports become a less-important growth driver for the country. Exports accounted for 18% of China’s economy last year, down from a peak above 32% in 2006.

Saudi Arabia and Russia Signal Oil-Cuts Extension Into 2018
  • Brimming U.S. oil storage tanks to feel OPEC cuts last The energy industry scrutinizes U.S. oil stockpile data every week for evidence that OPEC supply cuts are ending a global crude glut, but growing domestic output means the world’s largest oil consumer may be the last place to feel the cuts.
EARNINGS WATCH

From Factset’s weekly summary:

Overall, 83% of the companies in the S&P 500 have reported earnings to date for the first quarter. Of these companies, 75% have reported actual EPS above the mean EPS estimate, 7% have reported actual EPS equal to the mean EPS estimate, and 18% have reported actual EPS below the mean EPS estimate. The percentage of companies reporting EPS above the mean EPS estimate is above the 1-year (70%) average and above the 5-year (68%) average.

In aggregate, companies are reporting earnings that are 6.2% above expectations. This surprise percentage is above the 1-year (+4.3%) average and above the 5-year (+4.1%) average.

In terms of revenues, 66% of companies have reported actual sales above estimated sales and 34% have reported actual sales below estimated sales. The percentage of companies reporting sales above estimates is above the 1- year average (53%) and above the 5-year average (53%).

In aggregate, companies are reporting sales that are 0.9% above expectations. This surprise percentage is above the 1-year (0.0%) average and above the 5-year (+0.1%) average.

The blended earnings growth rate for the first quarter is 13.5% this week, which is higher than the earnings growth rate of 12.6% last week and 9.0% at the end of the first quarter.

If the Energy sector is excluded, the blended earnings growth rate for the remaining ten sectors would fall to 9.3% from 13.5%. If the Energy sector is excluded, the blended earnings growth rate for the index would fall to 5.7% from 7.6%.

At this point in time, 83 companies in the index have issued EPS guidance for Q2 2017. Of these 83 companies, 58 have issued negative EPS guidance and 25 have issued positive EPS guidance. The percentage of companies issuing negative EPS guidance is 70%, which is below the 5-year average of 74%.

Nearly 50% of the remaining 82 S&P 500 companies to report Q1 results are consumer-centric companies, including 25 retailers, most of which being “old-style” as opposed to the more “in-style” companies like Amazon (38%), Ulta Beauty (+24%) and Netflix (+566%) and the fast growing home improvement companies such as Lowe’s (+21%). Given the weak consumer data throughout Q1, forthcoming results are likely to be much les buoyant.

image

image

U.S. Companies Strike an Earnings Gusher Earnings season has offered plenty of reasons for investors to be optimistic. Even more good news is on the way.

(…) Wall Street analysts, who normally lower their earnings forecasts throughout a quarter, have cut them for the current quarter at the slowest pace since 2014, according to FactSet. They forecast second-quarter earnings growth of 7.6%, compared with an 8.8% projection at the end of March. (…)

OUT OF BREADTH?

The Blog of HORAN Capital Advisors writes that the five largest companies in the S&P 500 Index are technology stocks, Apple (AAPL), Alphabet (GOOGL), Microsft (MSFT), Amazon (AMZN) and Facebook (FB). These 5 stocks account for 13.1% of the Index and Capital Advisors calculates that these five stocks account for over 50% of the index’s return this year.

But Lowry’s Research counters by explaining that

Over our 92 year history of bull and bear markets, one of the most reliable indications that a major market top is near has been the NY all-issues Adv-Dec Line and, since the early 1990’s, our Operating Companies Only (OCO) Adv-Dec Line. As has been noted in many prior reports, divergences between these Adv-Dec Lines and highs in the major price indexes historically appear about 4-6 months prior to a final bull market top.

As of last Friday, Lowry’s analysis

shows few of the signs of a weakening primary trend. To the contrary, ongoing trends of expanding Demand and contracting Supply, together with positive breadth and the current strength exhibited by small cap vs. large cap stocks, suggest this bull market still has a long way to run. Fingers crossed

Nerd smile In as much as I think that Lowry’s technical work is as smart as it can be, I am wondering if the sharp decline in the share of money actively managed and the huge flows into ETF products is not changing the game for them and for everybody scrutinizing relative trends and money flows.

Here are some other thoughts on the market technicals from Jim Carroll, Managing Partner, LongRun Capital Management. (Via The Daily Shot)

The S&P 500 finally punched through to a new high today on good jobs numbers and expectation of a favorable outcome from this Sunday’s French election. Under the surface, there is still work to do from a breadth perspective. As shown in the chart below, the number of stocks on bullish chart patterns has declined since the last S&P high on March 1st. This indicates that new highs for the indices (Nasdaq has also notched new highs) are being driven by a smaller number of strong names. This is not a certain death knell for the rally, but the direction of bullish % needs to reverse in order to sustain the positive momentum.

ETFs

More on this risk in this Wealthtrack video.

Wall Street frets as trading activity trails off Second quarter slowdown comes as volatility falls and investors become cautious

(…) Big investment banks reported generally solid profits over the first three months of the year, as investors reset their portfolios to take account of higher base interest rates, and as companies front-loaded efforts to raise money. For all bar four of the top 14 banks, first quarter trading revenues were higher than a year earlier. In debt trading, all 14 apart from UBS and Barclays reported year-on-year rises.

But activity faded in April and, so far in May, it has been quiet, according to traders — suggesting many banks will struggle to sustain that bright start to the year. (…)

Trump’s Fiscal Plans, Fed’s Asset Unwinding Could Fuel Rate Rise

President Donald Trump is flirting with tax and spending plans that could widen the budget deficit, just as the Fed flirts with plans to shrink its $4.5 trillion portfolio of bond and other holdings. Larger deficits could mean that the supply of U.S. Treasury securities hitting the markets is rising just as demand for these securities diminishes with the Fed unwinding. (…)

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and his staff are already considering how to handle the challenge of raising large amounts of debt. Last week, the Treasury sought the counsel of its Borrowing Advisory Committee, composed of major Wall Street bond market participants.

The committee cautioned that under plausible scenarios, the Treasury might have to more than double the amount of debt it auctions for 10-year and 30-year bonds. (…)

US Tax Reform May Put Speculative Grade Issuers at Risk A significant cut in the US corporate tax rate could pressure the corporate credit profiles of speculative grade issuers with large debt burdens and a high cost of debt should it be applied alongside an elimination of interest expense deductibility.

(…) The loss of the tax shield generated by interest expense would effectively make debt more costly. Taken in isolation, the elimination of interest expense deductibility would ultimately increase cash taxes paid. This is less of a concern for investment grade issuers, but could have a greater impact on speculative-grade issuers, especially those in the ‘B’ category and below. Rising interest rates will compound this negative cash flow impact.

In the hypothetical example below, we illustrate the effects of tax reform on FFO for a typical ‘B’ credit at varying levels of leverage and cost of debt. Assuming the non-deductibility of interest expense and a reduction in the corporate tax rate to 15% from 35%, we find that the impact to cash flows becomes increasingly negative with greater levels of leverage and cost of debt. This analysis assumes a change in the tax rate and the loss of 100% interest expense deductibility (assumes no interest income), and all else equal. (…)

image
How lucky do you feel?

image

(…) In a securities filing Friday, Verizon said given S&P’s change of view “we no longer expect to be able to achieve an upgrade to our pre-Vodafone credit rating” by 2018 or 2019. The company declined to comment further.

The comments could add to mounting investor pressure on Verizon to make a big acquisition that eases its dependence on the cellphone business, analysts said. Confused smile (…)

Senate Tackles Rewrite on GOP Health-Care Bill Republican senators aim to begin a formal full rewrite of the House GOP health-care bill, driven in part by a sense that the House version made insurance less expensive for young people but costlier for older Americans—an influential, mostly GOP voting bloc.
OMINOUS SIGNS

My on going tab on signs we have finally gone full circle:

  • Charles Schwab Profit Rises as New Accounts Surge New retail brokerage accounts tallied 235,000 during the quarter, up 44%.
  • Personal anecdote: a 53 year old door installer was watching his stock ptf. on his cell phone while doing work at my house this week…In fact, he asked us for access to our wi-fi network, not being able to get his own unlimited cell phone plan…
  • Heard on NPR, a one hour “show” (between 4 and 5 pm) on on-line trading and how day-trading and/or “swing-trading” can “easily” take you to financial independence, whether markets go up, down or sideways. That “show” is really a one-hour advertising for OnlineTrading Academy which claims that “You don’t have to work on
    Wall Street to make money like Wall Street.”
  • Beef Stroganoff for Your Dog? Pet Food Goes Upscale Pet-food companies are selling dishes, such as meat lasagna and beef stroganoff, that look and smell like human food. Appealing to human beings is helping the industry charge more, boosting revenue even as sales volumes slip.

THE DAILY EDGE (2 May 2017): Consumers, PMIs, Earnings

U.S. Consumer Spending Rises After Inflation, While Prices Drop in March Americans’ spending grew steadily in March after accounting for inflation, positioning the economy to rebound from another winter slowdown, yet a drop in consumer prices signaled underlying economic sluggishness.

Personal consumption, a measure of what households spent on everything from groceries to dental care, rose 0.3% after inflation, the Commerce Department said Monday. That followed two months of declines.

Without accounting for inflation, spending was flat. (…)

Personal income—measuring wages, salaries, investment returns and government assistance—rose 0.2% in March from a month earlier. Real disposable income—or the money left over after inflation and taxes—grew 0.5%, the strongest gain since late 2015. (…)

The Fed’s preferred inflation gauge, the price index for personal-consumption expenditures, fell 0.2% in March from a month earlier. Core prices, which exclude volatile food and energy components, declined 0.1%, falling for the first time since 2001.

The overall price index briefly hit the Fed’s annual 2% target in February but slipped below it again in March. Compared with a year earlier, overall prices rose 1.8% in March, while core prices climbed 1.6%. (…)

Following up on my April 3 post, THE U.S. CONSUMER: FRAGILE STRENGTH:

  • growth in personal income is slowing from +0.4% MoM in January and +0.3% in February to +0.2% in March.
  • wages and salaries rose only 0.1% in March, down from +0.9% in Jan-Feb. combined.
  • after tax disposable income was up 4.3% YoY in March but the sequential advance slowed to +0.2% in March, bringing Q1 to a +3.2% annualized gain, down from +3.7% in Q4’16, +4.4% in Q3’16 and +5.7% in Q2’16.
  • But deflating prices helped real DPI gain 0.5% in March (+2.4% YoY) enabling a 0.3% rise in real spending following –0.4% in Jan-Feb. combined.

In all, the income side has turned sluggish but real expenditures are holding up thanks to negative headline and core inflation in March. The apparent YoY acceleration in disposable income will end soon given the slow down in sequential income growth and the continued deceleration in employment growth. Unless the economy pricks up in Q2, only declining prices will sustain real spending. Friday’s employment report for April will be very interesting.

image

(…) Over the past eight years, the economy has grown at an average rate of 1% in the first quarter, while growing at a 2.3% rate over the remaining three quarters. Much of the blame for this quirk has been placed difficulties the Commerce Department has faced adjusting the GDP figures for seasonal swings in an evolving economy. So it is natural to think growth will pick up, and that is what forecasters are banking on. Economists at J.P. Morgan for example, estimate the GDP will expand at a 3% rate in the current quarter.

But the worrisome thing about the GDP report is where the weakness was. Consumer spending grew at just a 0.3% annual rate—its slowest showing since the fourth quarter of 2009. The number is more worrisome because consumer spending accounts for about two-thirds of the economy and because it isn’t the part of the GDP report where seasonality problems have shown up. As confirmed by soft monthly retail sales and the drop off in car sales, the first-quarter spending slowdown was real.

With incomes rising, consumers will probably spend more, though rising inflation is eroding their gains. Unusual weather and a delay in tax refunds may have weighed on spending over the winter, for example, so there ought to be some catch-up.

Still, there are reasons to worry the rebound will be unimpressive. Jobs growth has been slowing as the U.S. has crept closer to full employment, so there are fewer new paychecks getting added to the income pile. Lenders have become a little more leery of extending credit for auto purchases and other consumer items, while the number of consumers falling behind on payments has started to rise. (…)

Retail Slump Pounds Manhattan Landlords

(…) Average prices for ground-floor space in nine of the 11 major retail districts in Manhattan fell in the first three months of 2017, according to real-estate services firm Cushman & Wakefield. SoHo recorded the largest percentage drop in average asking rent from the previous year, falling 12% to $488 a square foot.

The availability rates along most of those corridors also increased, with the stretch of lower Fifth Avenue between 42nd and 49th streets reporting the highest rate at almost 33%. (…)

While some owners of New York retail properties are reluctant to offer drastic rent cuts, they have become much more generous with other enticements such as free rental periods and contributions toward the costs of building out a store, incentives that were rare a few years ago, brokers said. (…)

Slowest improvement in manufacturing business conditions since September 2016

The seasonally adjusted Markit final US Manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index™ (PMI™) registered 52.8 in April, down from 53.3 in March, to signal the slowest improvement in overall business conditions since September 2016. A fall in the headline PMI largely reflected weaker contributions from output and new business growth in April, which more than offset a slight rebound in job creation.

Manufacturing production increased for the eleventh successive month in April. The latest survey signalled that the rate of expansion nonetheless eased to its weakest for seven months. New order growth also moderated to its slowest since September 2016, which survey respondents mainly linked to more cautious spending among domestic clients. Meanwhile, export sales gained momentum in April, with the latest rise in new work from abroad the fastest since August 2016. (…)

The signs of slowing growth are most evident in the domestic consumer sector, but investment goods manufacturers continue to fare well, enjoying stronger capital equipment spending from the energy sector in particular. (…)

image

Manufacturers also sought to reduce their inventory holdings, with stocks of purchases falling slightly for the first time in seven months. In contrast, postproduction inventories increased at a modest pace in April. (…)

Meanwhile, the latest survey highlighted strong cost pressures across the manufacturing sector. The rate of input price inflation accelerated to its fastest since September 2014. A number of panel members cited higher prices for metals, especially steel. Efforts to pass on higher costs to clients led to the most marked rise in factory gate charges for nearly two-and-a-half years.

The Institute for Supply Management on Monday said its closely watched index of U.S. manufacturing activity fell to 54.8 in April from 57.2 in March. (…) Sub indexes that fell most sharply— the new orders index fell 7 percentage points to 57.5, and employment sank 6.9 points to 52—remain in positive territory. (…)

The ISM index for exports last month rose to its highest level since November of 2013. (…)

U.S. gasoline demand falls for second straight month: EIA U.S. gasoline demand fell 2.4 percent in February from a year earlier, the second straight monthly decline, according to data released on Friday by the U.S. Energy Information Administration that suggested the market may have trouble repeating last year’s record volumes.

January demand for gasoline fell 1.9 percent from last year, EIA data showed. (…)

 

Source: @boes_

Fed’s Low-and-Slow Strategy Tested by Business-Spending Pickup

(…) Underneath a weak reading of first-quarter gross domestic product on Friday, non-residential investment in structures, equipment and intellectual property grew at a 9.4 percent annualized pace, the fastest since the fourth quarter of 2013. While the Bureau of Economic Analysis attributed the increase to a significant jump in “mining exploration, shafts, and wells” — which reflects a surge in oil-and-gas drilling — almost all categories of investment showed gains. (…)

A sustained pickup in business investment is a big question mark. There are many reasons to question a forecast of a sudden burst of productivity fueled by a capital-spending boom, said Michael Gapen, chief U.S. economist at Barclays Plc. The biggest determinants of business spending, he said, are current and past economic activity. In other words, it takes a lot to shake expectations in executive suites that tomorrow’s economy will be faster than the 2 percent growth they’ve seen in recent years. (…)

Businesses have been so tight with spending, however, that something may eventually have to change. The age of private fixed assets in the U.S. is 22.4 years, the oldest since 1955. Also, corporate balance sheets are in good shape and can support more investment, Deutsche Bank’s Slok said in a recent report.

On top of that, business surveys are showing more confidence and economic data are indicating more signs of a pickup.

Orders for non-military goods excluding aircraft, a proxy for business investment in equipment, rose an annualized 6 percent in the first three months of the year, Commerce Department data showed Thursday. That was the best quarterly performance for bookings since the third quarter of 2014. The new orders index in the Chicago purchasing managers’ index released Friday rose to 65.9 in April from 60.4 in March, according to an email to clients from RDQ Economics in New York. (…)

Hmmm…Actually, new orders for non-def cap goods ex-air rose 0.5% in total between December and March; that is a 2.0% annualized rate the last time I did the calculation. Improving nonetheless but not booming.

image
image
Trump Gambles on Big Health Victory The White House is pursuing a twisting path in Congress this week, yielding to Democratic demands on a major spending bill while aggressively pushing a partisan health-care measure, gambling on a big win on health but risking setbacks on both fronts

House GOP leaders hope to corral enough votes on health care by Thursday, since Congress departs for recess next week and Republicans want to begin tackling taxes, another complex issue, when they return.

Leaders were tight-lipped Monday night on precisely how many votes short they remain, according to lawmakers leaving a regular meeting of the whip team. Although some lawmakers are still pushing for changes to the bill, others said time had run out. At least 19 House Republicans are currently opposed to the bill, with at least 17 undecided, according to a Wall Street Journal survey of the lawmakers. The GOP can only afford to lose about 22 votes, depending on absences.

Meanwhile, frustrating some conservatives, President Donald Trump has backed off his longtime demands for immediate funding for a wall on the Mexican border in the spending bill. The White House also has declined to insist on its plans to cut Environmental Protection Agency funding and to deny funding to “sanctuary” cities. (…)

The risk for Mr. Trump is that it is far from clear that Republicans can round up the 216 votes they need on health care, especially from GOP centrists, after making changes in their initial proposal to win over conservatives. The centrists are especially spooked by a provision allowing insurers in some states to charge higher premiums to patients with pre-existing medical conditions who have let their coverage lapse. (…)

The White House is pushing aggressively for a vote on health care this week, eager for a victory on the politically potent subject. House leaders, including Speaker Paul Ryan (R., Wis.), embarrassed by having to pull an earlier version of the bill at the last moment, have not committed to a timeline. (…)

Eurozone manufacturing expands at fastest pace in six years

At 56.7 in April, up from 56.2 in March, the final Markit Eurozone Manufacturing PMI® rose to a six-year high. The PMI was only a tick below the earlier flash estimate of 56.8. Seven out of the eight nations covered recorded an improvement in operating conditions. Growth was led by Germany, which saw its rate of expansion remain close to March’s 71-month high. (… ) France, Italy and Austria saw growth accelerate to rates last achieved around six years ago. Rates of expansion also recovered from recent lows in Spain and Ireland. (…)

The latest survey readings indicate that manufacturing is growing at an annual rate of approximately 4-5%, which should make a significant contribution to overall economic growth. (…)

image

April saw manufacturing production and new orders both expand to the greatest extents since April 2011. Companies reported that demand improved from both domestic and export clients.

New export business also rose at the quickest pace for six years, led by strong (albeit slower) gains in Germany and faster rates of expansion in France, Italy, Spain, Austria and Ireland. The Netherlands also saw a strong increase in new export work, in contrast to a further sharp decrease in Greece. (…)

The rate of increase in staffing levels accelerated to its fastest in six years and was among the best registered since early-2000. Solid jobs growth was seen in almost all of the nations covered. (…)

Price pressures remained elevated during the latest survey month. Input costs increased at a rate close to February’s 69-month high. As a consequence, selling prices continued to rise, with the pace of inflation close to March’s near six-year record. Some firms linked higher costs to supply chain factors. This was further highlighted by vendor lead times lengthening to the sharpest degree since May 2011, signalling a growing trend towards a sellers’ market for many items.

China’s Credit Slowdown Poses a Threat to Global Growth China is making yet another attempt to rein in its overleveraged financial system, threatening to hamper the economy at a time when credit growth is already decelerating. Investors outside the country don’t seem to care, but they should.

(…) China this year has tightened monetary policy and launched a regulatory assault on off-balance sheet and interbank lending, squeezing financing for speculative vehicles. In the past China’s crackdowns on shadow banking have proved temporary, but the new head of the China Banking Regulatory Commission, Guo Shuqing, has more credibility than his predecessors. The CBRC has this year issued a flurry of orders including detailed work aimed at “regulatory arbitrage,” or rule-dodging.

“Basically every commercial bank in China is involved in at least some of the long list of activities now targeted by regulators,” said Chen Long at Gavekal Dragonomics in a note to clients.

Yields on Chinese bonds have risen and share prices in Shanghai and Shenzhen fallen as Chinese investors came to realize that Mr. Guo was serious in his attack on shadow banking. (…)

But China watchers are reassured that the authorities won’t do anything to risk upsetting the economy before Xi Jinping’s expected second term as president is signed off by the Communist Party Congress in the fall. Economic stability is assured, the argument goes, because anything else would be unthinkable. (…)

The reason to be concerned about China now is that a slowdown in credit hurts growth and could spread to the rest of the world, piling pressure on commodity producers. (…)

EARNINGS WATCH

Facstet’s summary as of last Friday:

Overall, 58% of the companies in the S&P 500 have reported earnings to date for the first quarter. Of these companies, 77% have reported actual EPS above the mean EPS estimate, 8% have reported actual EPS equal to the mean EPS estimate, and 14% have reported actual EPS below the mean EPS estimate. The percentage of companies reporting EPS above the mean EPS estimate is above the 1-year (70%) average and above the 5-year (68%) average.

In aggregate, companies are reporting earnings that are 6.7% above expectations. This surprise percentage is above the 1-year (+4.3%) average and above the 5-year (+4.1%) average.

The Energy (+24.5%) and Consumer Discretionary (+12.5%) sectors are reporting the largest upside aggregate differences between actual earnings and estimated earnings, while the Telecom Services (-0.5%) and Consumer Staples (-0.1%) sectors are reporting the largest downside aggregate differences between actual earnings and estimated earnings.

In terms of revenues, 68% of companies have reported actual sales above estimated sales and 32% have reported actual sales below estimated sales. The percentage of companies reporting sales above estimates is above the 1- year average (53%) and above the 5-year average (53%).

In aggregate, companies are reporting sales that are 1.0% above expectations. This surprise percentage is above the 1-year (0.0%) average and above the 5-year (+0.1%) average.

The Materials (+4.2%) and Consumer Discretionary (+2.8%) sectors are reporting the largest upside aggregate differences between actual sales and estimated sales, while the Telecom Services (-2.5%) and Consumer Staples (-1.1%) sectors are reporting the largest downside aggregate differences between actual earnings and estimated earnings.

The blended earnings growth rate for the first quarter is 12.5% this week, which is higher than the earnings growth rate of 9.9% last week. (…) If [the Energy] sector is excluded, the blended earnings growth rate for the remaining ten sectors would fall to 8.3% from 12.5%.

If the Energy sector is excluded, the blended revenue growth rate for the index would fall to 5.6% from 7.5%.

At this point in time, 62 companies in the index have issued EPS guidance for Q2 2017. Of these 62 companies, 38 have issued negative EPS guidance and 24 have issued positive EPS guidance. The percentage of companies issuing negative EPS guidance is 61% (38 out of 62), which is well below the 5-year average of 74%.

In the Information Technology sector, more companies have issued positive EPS guidance (10) than negative EPS guidance (7).

image

As of yesterday night:

  • 302 companies (65.6% of the S&P 500’s market cap) have reported. Earnings are beating by 6.4%, with 78% of companies surpassing bottom-line estimates. Revenues are surprising by 0.7%.
  • Expectations are for revenue, earnings, and EPS growth of 6.9%, 12.2%, and 14.1%, respectively. EPS is on pace for 15.7%, assuming a typical beat rate for the remainder of the season. (RBC)
SENTIMENT WATCH

Hmmm…

After 100 Days of Trump Presidency, Advisers Say Client Worry Has Eased After Donald Trump’s surprise election victory, many wealth managers were inundated with calls from clients both concerned and looking for ways to capitalize on his presidency. Now, as the president hits the 100-day mark, financial advisers say those calls have subsided and clients’ outlook has moderated.
The First Day of the Rest of the Presidency (Karl Rove) As the media obsesses over a fake milestone, Trump should take a minute to recalibrate.

(…) Much of this plan has yet to be passed into law or even introduced, but Mr. Trump has nonetheless compiled some respectable achievements. He recruited an impressive cabinet, especially in the foreign-policy and national-security areas. His spectacular Supreme Court nominee was confirmed, and Mr. Trump greenlighted the Keystone XL and Dakota Access pipelines. He took action against Syria, adopted a surprisingly tough line on Russia, and held positive meetings with world leaders.

Mr. Trump froze hiring of many federal workers, required rescinding two regulations of equal cost for every new rule created, and signed laws repealing last-minute Obama regulations that cost the economy billions. The stock market is up around 14% since Election Day and consumers are more confident than they’ve been in years.

Mr. Trump also points to nixing the Trans-Pacific Partnership, issuing dozens of executive orders, browbeating Ford and Carrier to keep jobs in America, and slowing illegal immigration. Not all the executive orders needed to be executive orders, but that’s unimportant to voters, who want to see action, strength, and promises being kept.

On the down side, the president’s poorly drafted travel ban blew up and his sanctuary-city executive order could too. Worse, House Freedom Caucus members stymied ObamaCare’s repeal and replacement, slowing the administration’s overall momentum. Tax reform will take until the fall—it always would—and remains a heavy lift. The administration seems more ragged, unfocused, understaffed and disorganized than any other in modern times, prone to overpromising and under-delivering.

This all leaves Mr. Trump with only 42% of Americans approving his performance, according to the RealClearPolitics average. With a 53% disapproval, the president easily earns the worst numbers ever recorded at this point. The Gallup average for modern presidents around this time is 61% approval. Mr. Trump had no honeymoon as president.

Yet 96% of his 2016 supporters would vote for him again, according to an April 17-20 ABC/Washington Post survey. (…)

Another troubling sign: While Mr. Trump is seen as “a strong leader” by 53% in the ABC/Washington Post survey, a majority thinks he “lacks the judgment and the temperament it takes to serve effectively.” Meantime, about 6 voters in 10 doubt his honesty and think he is out of touch.

This should provide openings for Democrats, but they have little to gloat about. While 47% said in an April 17-20 NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll they favored a Democratic Congress in the midterms, 43% favored keeping Republicans in charge. Democrats led on this measure by 9 points in April 2009 before being soundly beaten in the next midterm elections.

Because they control the White House and Congress, Republicans have the advantage of being masters of their own fate. They can shape the 2018 narrative by getting things done, especially on the economy. Democrats must hope the GOP screws up at both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue. That’s a distinct possibility, but if Republicans don’t, there’s no good foothold for Democrats.

The first 100 days of the Trump presidency shouldn’t bring comfort to either party: The Trump legacy will be decided by what happens after this arbitrary milestone. The president would be wise to recalibrate, reset and make changes in how he operates before today’s lowly ratings lock in place.

“This is more work than in my previous life. I thought it would be easier.”

Greenspan Says Trump Has a Math Problem With His Budget
Tax Plan Could Turn ‘Everyone and Their Dog’ Into an LLC
Nerd smile Too Many Investors Believe the Unlikely, Avoid Reality Investors would spare themselves embarrassment and loss by confronting information instead of hiding from it. Most do the opposite, writes Jason Zweig.

(…) There’s another reason so many investors believe in magic: We can’t handle the truth.

The efficient market hypothesis holds that stock prices fully reflect all the relevant information that is available. What if, instead, investors are so efficient at avoiding some information that it might as well not even exist?

Psychologists call this behavior “information avoidance.” You could also call it intentional ignorance.

“It’s a motivated decision to say ‘no’ to learning available but unwanted information,” says Jennifer Howell, a psychologist at Ohio University in Athens, Ohio, who studies the phenomenon. “People avoid information if it’s going to make them feel or behave or think in a way they don’t want to” — especially any evidence that could jeopardize their belief in their competence and autonomy or could require taking difficult or prolonged action. (…)

Researchers have documented for decades that people are much less willing to sell investments that have gone down in price. To “realize” a loss means not only to make it actual, but also to become aware of it. If you don’t lock in a loss by selling it, you don’t have to think about it or admit you made a mistake. (…)

However, you can’t tell whether your ideas are valid unless you let them be challenged. Just as the most partisan voters — of all stripes — shouldn’t remain deaf and blind to evidence that their favorite politicians might be wrong, investors would spare themselves embarrassment and loss by confronting information instead of hiding from it. (…)

Finally ask: What conditions or circumstances would it take for me to be proven wrong? If your answer is “none” or “that’s impossible,” you have a severe case of information avoidance. The only cure for that might be the shock of losses that come at you like a bolt from the blue.

New Yorkers Flock to Booming Sun Belt as Trek South Resumes

Almost 600,000 Americans moved from the Midwest and Northeast to the Sun Belt states last year, the most since 2005, according to Brookings Institution demographer William Frey. Migration is boosting growth along Southeast and Western coasts as well as Nevada and Arizona, reflecting a healthier national economy that has made it easier to re-locate. (…)

Florida added 207,155 people in 2016, or almost 600 people a day. By contrast, New York, Illinois and California each lost more than 100,000 people. (…)

And this was before the coming tax reform:

The tax policy outline Mr. Trump unveiled Wednesday proposes repealing the deduction for state and local taxes, which lets individuals subtract their home-state levies from their federal taxable income. That move was a major shift for Mr. Trump, who previously had called for capping deductions but not killing the break.

What makes the latest proposal politically divisive—and could lead to a split inside the Republican Party—is that it would shift the tax burden from low-tax states such as Texas and Florida to high-tax states such as New York and New Jersey. Blue-state Democrats criticized the proposal, as expected, but Republicans from those states don’t like it either. (…)

Removing the deduction could raise more than $1 trillion over a decade, according to independent estimates, which would help offset the cost of GOP rate cuts.

The deduction, one of the largest breaks for individuals, saves taxpayers about $103 billion this year, according to the congressional Joint Committee on Taxation.

Losses Lurk in Trump Tax Plan

Donald Trump’s tax plan, if adopted, has been seen as an unmitigated windfall for corporate America. Cutting the corporate tax rate to 15 percent from its current effective rate of around 28 percent could generate nearly $2 trillion in additional income for the companies in the S&P 500 index alone over a decade.

But a surprising number of companies could be hurt at first. In all, because of an accounting quirk, the Trump corporate tax cut could erase as much as $210 billion from the bottom lines of companies in the S&P 500 in the first year. (…)

The reason for the potential big losses has to do with tax-loss carry-forwards and the accounting for them. When a company loses money, it can use some of those losses to offset taxes it will have to pay in the future. Accountants see those tax credits as an asset, and companies have to note them on their balance sheets. They are typically called deferred tax assets, or DTAs, and they sit on balance sheets along with more real world assets, like cash or inventory or plants and equipment, contributing to the book value or net worth of a company.

(…) A lower future tax bill means those tax credits, only a portion of which can be used each year, are worth less. And companies are forced to capitalize those deferred tax assets at the statutory rate, which is now 35 percent.

Here’s the problem: A big drop in the corporate tax to 15 percent would diminish the value of those DTAs as well, by as much as 57 percent. Worse, while the benefit of the asset accrues over time, accounting rules force companies to realize any drop in the value of those assets immediately. The result is a big one time write-off. And when companies write down any asset, they are forced to take a charge to earnings as well.

A surprising number of companies have DTAs on their balance sheets. Of the S&P 500, 263 companies list deferred taxes as part of their assets. For most of them, the value of the tax asset is relatively small, less than $500 million for two-thirds of the group. But 60 companies have more than $1 billion in DTAs, and some companies much more than that. 

Many of the big holders of DTAs are the financial firms that narrowly survived the financial crisis. Citigroup, for instance, has nearly $47 billion in DTAs, the most of any company in the S&P 500. Bank of America and AIG have $28 billion and $14 billion, respectively. Other large holders include General Motors at $35 billion, Ford at $10 billion and both Lockheed Martin and Johnson & Johnson at more than $6 billion. (…)