The enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it’s the illusion of knowledge (Stephen Hawking)

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so (Mark Twain)

Invest with smart knowledge and objective odds

NEW$ & VIEW$ (17 JUNE 2014)

Epsilon Theory: Long Term Parking

This recent piece from Ben Hunt is a good read in its entirety (click on post title to access it). Some excerpts:

(…) the problem with the US economy in 2014 is not that there is too much private debt being created, but too little. The danger for US markets is not that there is some private debt bubble about to burst, but that markets have become disconnected from the natural cycle of debt and growth, a cycle which remains decidedly anemic. (…)

First, debt in an absolute sense is never a problem. The problem, as Tony Soprano would be happy to explain to you as he cracks a baseball bat across your knees, arises when your debt obligation outstrips your ability to pay it back. This problem does not exist for households or corporations in the US.

Here’s a chart from Fed data showing household debt service obligations as a percentage of disposable income. Debt servicing has not been this easy for American households since the Fed started compiling the data in 1980.

 image

For corporations, here’s a chart from Bloomberg data showing the ratio of net debt (debt minus cash) to EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) for the S&P 500. This is a very standard measure of liquidity and leverage, and today’s ratio of 1.37 is less than one-third what it was before the Great Recession. The cold hard fact is that US corporate balance sheets have not been this strong or less levered in more than 20 years.

image

Just kidding Here I disagree with Ben. There is something wrong with the aggregations. Today, the financial condition of the “haves” is very, very different from that of the “have less” and the “have nots”. If you doubt that, please read “Generation Renter” below. Same thing with corporations. A lot have net debt and a few have gigornous net cash levels. The aggregate is but a useless camel.

But here’s more good stuff from Ben’s piece for the bubble watchers out there:

Second, a market bubble can only exist in the form of market securities. If debt is not securitized it never reaches the public market and does not create a bubble. (…) ABS issuance last year was not even equal to what it was in 2000, and is more than $100 billion below its peaks in the go-go years of 2005-2007. Sorry, no bubble here.

Third, even if a high level of poorly underwritten private debt manages to find a high degree of securitization – I’m looking at you, student debt – a bubble can’t exist if the private debts are backstopped by public debt. This was the magic of the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (TLGP), which for my money was the single most important program – far more than QE 1 – in preventing the world from imploding after Lehman’s bankruptcy. (…)

Okay, so maybe there are no private debt bubbles lurking around, and maybe Minsky-esque bubble-bursting isn’t the danger. But isn’t there some sort of danger associated with the $5 trillion dollars in public debt on the Fed’s balance sheet? Isn’t this a dangerous bubble? Yes and yes! But it’s an entirely different (and counter-intuitive) sort of danger than what everyone is shouting about.

First the punch line. The Fed’s public debt bubble can only burst if private debt growth takes off, and the bursting of the Fed’s bubble leads to rampant inflation, not rampant defaults.

Why? Because the massive debt racked up by the Fed in its QE purchases of US sovereign debt and mortgage-backed securities doesn’t work like household or corporate debt. The money for this buying spree never actually enters the real economy, but instead sits in the reserve accounts of the big banks. And that’s where it sits, and sits, and sits … until the big banks use those reserves to make private loans to households or corporations that want to use that money for some sort of real-world economic activity. This private lending activity is what turns reserves into money, and the cascading usage of that money – where it flows through multiple hands making real economic purchases – is what turns money into inflationary pressures and expectations. (…)

But here’s the thing. Precisely because the bursting of the Fed’s public debt bubble through private debt acceleration would be a disaster of unimaginable proportions, I don’t think it will ever happen. So far it certainly hasn’t. (…)

But if the velocity of money never picks up, that means that private debt growth never takes off. And if private debt growth never takes off, the real economy remains stuck in this mediocre, constantly disappointing growth malaise. (…)

The Fed’s bubble is currently parked in the banking reserve system, and I think that’s where it’s going to stay for a really long time. (…)

Here’s another treat, this one from Core Logic:

Pointing up “Generation Renter” Millennials Delaying Milestone Life Events, Such As Homeownership, to Pursue Different Goals

(…) The homeownership rate for 25- to 34-year-old Baby Boomers (born in 1946 through 1964) was 51.6 percent in 1980, but for the same age cohort in 2012, it was nearly 14 percentage points lower at 37.9 percent. Marriage often drives the desire to become a homeowner, but it is happening later and later with each successive generation. The share of 18- to 32-year-old Millennials that are married was 26 percent in 2013, down from 36 percent for Generation X (born in the early 1960s through early 1980s) and 48 percent for Baby Boomers when they were the same age. (…) but their focus on higher education has increased. The proportion of Millennials between 25 and 32 years old with a bachelor’s degree was 34 percent in 2013, up from 24 percent for Baby Boomers when they were the same age. The rise of educational achievement has been occurring steadily and started well before the Great Recession began in 2007. Educational attainment is theoretically an investment in future income earning capability, so the fact that Millennials are more educated than prior generations should prove beneficial for their ability to become homeowners in the long term. However, in the short term, they will carry higher debt loads, and those with less than a bachelor’s degree are facing stiffer economic headwinds.

The Pew Research Center examined household incomes by generation four years after each generation went through a recession. They analyzed the real median incomes of 25- to 32-year-old households in 2013 (four years after the 2009 recession ended), Generation X in 1995 (four years after the 1991 recession ended) and Baby Boomers during the early 1980s, adjusting for changes in household size. The Millennial generation’s median income was $57,200 in 2013, compared to $54,100 for Generation X, and $54,800 for Baby Boomers. Yet, the comparison is very different when segmenting incomes by educational attainment and generation. The median income for Millennials with a bachelor’s degree was $89,100, 3 percent higher than Generation X ($86,300) and 16 percent higher than for Baby Boomers ($76,800). Millennials with bachelor’s degrees are doing well relative to previous generations.

Differences really emerge when looking at those with less than a bachelor’s degree. For those whose highest educational attainment is some college attendance, Millennials’ incomes are 6 percent lower than Generation X and 12 percent lower than Baby Boomers’ incomes. For those with only a high school degree, Millennials earned 12 percent less than Generation X and 19 percent less than Baby Boomers. While income inequality has increased for the country as a whole, there is more income inequality among Millennials than prior generations.

Delaying marriage, taking the time for educational achievement, and lower income levels for those who have not gone to college has slowed the rate of household formation for Millennials. In 2012, 36 percent of Millennials were living with their parents, the highest share in at least four decades according to the Pew Research Center. Since Millennials are becoming more educated and delaying household formation, their labor and balance sheet profiles are on lower trajectories relative to previous generations.

According to new Federal Reserve research, Millennials are less likely to be in the labor force and have half the net worth of Generation X and Baby Boomers at the same age, a massive difference. That is due to the associated debt with increased education, as well as lower incomes for those who didn’t go to college. Additionally, educational debt is associated with increased non-student debt because students, with limited or no income while studying, finance living expenses in addition to educational expenses. The share of households under 40 with student debt was 37 percent in 2013, the highest share on record.

While Millennials were severely impacted by the Great Recession, they were on a fundamentally different trajectory than their predecessors even before the recession, particularly as it pertains to education, debt and income. The cascading impact of Millennials’ changing economic impact is hampering their ability to achieve homeownership, which puts an increased emphasis on entry level affordable homeownership, such as condominiums. Unlike their predecessors, only a minority of Millennials are homeowners, so perhaps a more apt nickname for this cohort is Generation Renter, or Generation R.

Home Builders’ Confidence Index Posts First Gain Since December A gauge of home-builder confidence rose this month for the first time since December, though it reflected continued concern over weak buyer demand.

The National Association of Home Builders’ confidence index rose four points to a seasonally adjusted 49 in June, the trade group said Monday. (…)

The rise in the NAHB gauge this month reflected a marked improvement in its measure of current sales, which jumped to 54 from 48. Measures of future sales and buyer traffic also improved, though the latter rose to just 36.

A regional breakdown of the data showed confidence readings above 50 for both the South and the West, while the Northeast and Midwest were below that level. (…)

A survey of economists released this month by the National Association for Business Economics forecast new housing starts will reach 1.03 million down this year, down from 1.1 million forecast for this year in December. Still, that would be a 11% increase over 930,000 units built last year.

U.S. Industrial Production Rises 0.6% Output from U.S. factories, mines and utilities rose in May, the latest sign that growth has resumed in the critical industrial sector of the economy following a harsh winter and mid-spring dip.

Capacity utilization, a closely watched gauge of slack, ticked up 0.2 percentage point to 79.1% in May.

May’s rise reflected a 0.6% increase in manufacturing production, including a 1.5% jump in automotive output and a 1.1% rise in machinery production, and a 1.3% jump in mining output. Those gains were offset in part by a 0.8% decline in utility output.

Total industrial production in May was up 4.3% from a year earlier.

Total IP is up 1.1% (4.5% a.r) in the last 3 months. Manufacturing output is up 1.2%. Manufacturing of business equipment jumped 1.9%, 8% annualized. (Chart from Haver Analytics)

IMF Cuts U.S. Growth Forecast The International Monetary Fund cut its forecast for U.S. economic growth this year by 0.8 percentage points to 2% but said a meaningful economic rebound is nonetheless under way.
EU Inflation Falls, Raising Stimulus Expectations The annual rate of inflation in the 28-member European Union fell to levels seen in the wake of the 2009 global recession, raising expectations that other central banks in the bloc will follow the European Central Bank with stimulus measures.

The EU’s statistics agency Eurostat said Monday that the annual rate of inflation in the broader EU—which includes 10 countries that don’t use the euro—fell to 0.6% in May from 0.8% in April, its lowest level since October 2009, with the exception of March of this year.

In the 18-member euro zone alone, consumer prices were 0.1% lower than in April, and 0.5% higher than in May 2013, Eurostat said. The figure confirmed the preliminary estimate for the annual rate of inflation released earlier this month and was the lowest annual rate of inflation since November 2009, except for March of this year.

Eurostat said the core rate of inflation—which strips out volatile items such as energy and food—slipped to 0.7% from 1% in April, matching the record reached in March of this year and December 2013.

IEA Sees Shale Boom Expanding

The shale boom that has transformed the oil industry in the U.S. will spread beyond North America before the end of the decade, sooner than previously expected, the International Energy Agency said Tuesday, while at the same time warning of significant aboveground risks to conventional supply over the next five years.

(…) a mixture of legal, political and investment constraints have meant shale production has been slow to spread to other countries.

According to the IEA, that is changing faster than expected, with policy developments in Russia and Latin America set to encourage the application of unconventional extraction technologies on a larger scale than ever before.

In its most recent analysis, which takes a five-year view of the oil market, the IEA predicted that tight oil production from outside the U.S. could account for 650,000 barrels a day of global oil supply by 2019.

(…) By the end of the decade the IEA expects North America to produce 20% of the world’s oil supply and to have become a “titan of unprecedented proportions” in oil product markets as its exports of refined products soar. (…)

“While OPEC remains a vital supplier to the market, it faces significant headwinds in expanding capacity,” said Maria van der Hoeven, executive director at the IEA. (…)

According to the IEA, rising oil production in Iraq will account for 60% of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries’ growth in production capacity over the next five years, but even without the unrest currently sweeping the country, Iraq’s oil industry faces significant challenges from chronic infrastructure bottlenecks.

While Baghdad is targeting output of 8.5-9 million barrels a day by 2020, the IEA cut its forecast for Iraqi production capacity by nearly half a million barrels a day, projecting the country will produce just 4.5 million barrels a day by 2019.

“Given Iraq’s precarious political and security situation, the forecast is laden with downside risk,” the IEA said.

NEW$ & VIEW$ (16 JUNE 2014)

Real Estate Major Obstacle as China Engineers Stability for Now

China’s economy showed signs of stabilization in May. A contracting real estate sector and softening global demand mean it may be short lived. Industrial output, the main monthly measure of China’s growth, was up 8.8 percent year on year in May, edging up from 8.7 percent in April and in line with expectations. Fixed asset investment edged down and retail sales strengthened, reflecting higher prices.

Real activity indicators also pointed to stabilization. Output of electricity rose 5.9 percent on the previous year, up from 4.4 percent in April. Early signs in June are
positive, with prices for steel and other industrial commodities paring their falls from a year earlier.

The latest monthly indicators suggest growth momentum has been sustained over the course of May. Bloomberg’s monthly Nowcast of GDP continues to register 7.4 percent year-on-year growth, unchanged from April. (…) (BloombergBriefs)

image

Total electricity consumption rose 5.3% Y/Y in May, after 4.6% in April.  First 5 months: +5.2%. All of 2013: +7.3%.

Ninja But, just in case, China is making sure …:

China Reserve-Ratio Cut Extended to Merchants, Industrial China’s central bank extended a reserve-requirement cut to some national lenders including China Merchants Bank Co. and Industrial Bank Co. as officials try to support growth without unleashing broader stimulus.

BTW, ISI’s China survey keeps falling…

Smile Outlook Improves for PCs

Last week, chip maker Intel Corp. INTC +6.83%, citing a surprising surge in commercial PC purchases, boosted its financial forecast for the first time in nearly five years. The Silicon Valley giant said revenue in the current quarter would be about $700 million greater than it expected, sending its stock up nearly 7% on Friday.

CENTRAL BANKS WATCH

(…) This seems unlikely, because the US economic recovery is still lagging that in the UK. Nevertheless, the parameters within which investors view forward guidance, including the Fed’s “dots” showing the future path for interest rates, may have been somewhat shaken.

The BoE will no doubt argue that they never gave the markets any cast iron reason to believe that the first rate rise would be delayed far into 2015 or 2016. “When conditions change, I change my mind”, was the gist of what Mr Carney said at the Mansion House. But the central banks do seem to want it both ways: the main point of forward guidance, according to many economists, was to pre-commit to policies that would not change when conditions changed.

Everyone knew all along that forward guidance suffered from a serious problem of time inconsistency. What was convenient for the BoE and the Fed to say when they were at their most dovish in 2012/13 may not be convenient to deliver when the situation has changed in 2015/16. The BoE has now reminded the markets that the fine print in forward guidance needs to be read very carefully indeed.

What are the similarities, and the differences, between the UK and US situations?

 

(…) In the UK, the BoE has said repeatedly that it expects labour productivity growth to bounce back as the economy recovers, thus allowing the productive capacity of the economy to expand alongside demand. This has not happened so far, and it is one of the key reasons why several members of the MPC are clearly getting jumpy.

In the US, the equivalent issue is the puzzle about labour force participation. Chair Yellen has been very clear that she believes that a significant proportion of the decline in participation will be reversed if the economic expansion is maintained, but recent data have shown no sign whatsoever that this is happening. If not Ms Yellen herself, then several other members of the FOMC are likely to start worrying about this before too long. In fact, James Bullard has already led the way on this.

(…) Even if the controlling members on the FOMC remain inclined towards dovishness, as they almost certainly do, there must be a risk that they will change their minds in response to incoming economic data, in the same way that the BoE has done.

There is no risk premium protecting against this possibility built into the path for US forward short rates. In fact, following the bond rally that has occurred this year, the market seems vulnerable to a sudden re-assessment of the Fed’s basic dovishness, just as it was before the taper tantrum last year.

I do not expect these similarities to become apparent at the FOMC meeting and the press conference this week. The committee is still in the phoney war phase (or perhaps it should be called the phoney peace), in which tapering is continuing along a pre-ordained path, almost regardless of economic events.

That will not change until tapering ends in October. After that, the hawkish surprise administered by the BoE last week might become a great deal more relevant for Fed watchers.

Meanwhile:

(…) What if we were to look not at what Ms Yellen says, but at what Ms Yellen has done? We might then conclude that the Fed’s first rate hikes could indeed happen sooner than expected.

This is the intriguing premise of a tool being used internally at BlackRock, the world’s largest fund manager, which it has nicknamed “the Yellen index”. It is a measure that suggests, on the economic indicators favoured by Ms Yellen, monetary tightening is already overdue and the Fed falls further behind the curve with every passing day. (…)

There is a lot of secret sauce in the Yellen index that BlackRock will not share, but it blends together economic indicators which the Fed chair has referenced as important considerations for policy makers, together with the unemployment and inflation targets already set out by the Fed.

The firm has been tracking whether those indicators are above or below the point at which monetary policy has been tightened in the past. On the premise that the Yellen Fed will behave consistently with the Ben Bernanke Fed, where she was a prominent voice and later vice-chairman, the index has been flashing that policy tightening is imminent since around the turn of the year. (…)

BlackRock’s innovative approach to monitoring and predicting monetary policy does not stop with the Yellen index; it has also created a “Stein index” based on the yields of corporate credit, junk bonds and commercial mortgage-backed securities, markets where Mr Stein has expressed concern.

(…) The Stein index, like the Yellen index, is flashing red for tightening soon. (…)

Central banks around the world, including China’s, have shifted decisively into investing in equities as low interest rates have hit their revenues, according to a global study of 400 public sector institutions.

“A cluster of central banking investors has become major players on world equity markets,” says a report to be published this week by the Official Monetary and Financial Institutions Forum (Omfif), a central bank research and advisory group. The trend “could potentially contribute to overheated asset prices”, it warns. (…)

China’s State Administration of Foreign Exchange has become “the world’s largest public sector holder of equities”, according to officials quoted by Omfif. Safe, which manages $3.9tn, is part of the People’s Bank of China. “In a new development, it appears that PBoC itself has been directly buying minority equity stakes in important European companies,” Omfif adds. (…)

In Europe, the Swiss and Danish central banks are among those investing in equities. The Swiss National Bank has an equity quota of about 15 per cent. Omfif quotes Thomas Jordan, SNB’s chairman, as saying: “We are now invested in large, mid- and small-cap stocks in developed markets worldwide.” The Danish central bank’s equity portfolio was worth about $500m at the end of last year. (…)

EARNINGS WATCH

Although the growth rate for the second quarter has dropped since March 31, analysts have cut earnings estimates over the first two and a half months of the quarter by the lowest amount since Q2 2011. The percentage decline in the Q2 bottom-up EPS estimate (which is an aggregation of the earnings estimates for all 500 companies in the index and can be used as a proxy for the earnings for the index) was 1.2% over the first two and a half months of the quarter. This decline in the EPS estimate was lower than the trailing 1-year (-3.1%), 5- year (-2.0%), and 10-year (-3.8%) averages for the first two and a half months of a quarter. In fact, this marked the lowest decline in the bottom-up EPS estimate during the first two and a half months of a quarter since Q2 2011, when the bottom-up EPS estimate actually increased by 1.0%. (Factset)

With only two weeks left to quarter end, so far, so good. No additional pre-announcement last week. Still 75% negative pre-announcements this quarter, the lowest in more than 2 years. Combined with low analysts revisions, it seems that companies feel no need to taper expectations any more.

The First Call earnings revision index has also been rising lately.

Much has been written in the past week on the Q1 decline in corporate profits from current production. Here’s Moody’s take on that:

The likelihood of a further upturn by the rate of industrial capacity utilization weighs against a yearlong contraction by 2014’s core profits. Capacity utilization offers a macro view of operating leverage, where profits tend to move in the direction taken by the capacity utilization rate.

Early June’s consensus calls for an upturn by the annual growth rate of industrial production from 2013’s 2.9% to 3.7% in 2014 and 3.6% in 2015. As inferred from the production projections and assuming annual increases of 2.3% for industrial capacity, the average annual rate of industrial capacity utilization should steadily rise from 2013’s 77.9% to 79.1% in 2014 and 80.1% in 2015.

image

Ordinarily, profits grow when capacity utilization rates rise. For a sample beginning with Q1-1968 and ending in Q1-2014, the yearly changes of (i) the moving yearlong average of core profits and (ii) the industrial capacity utilization rate moved in the same direction in nearly 79% of the 182 quarterly observations. Thus, Q1-2014’s percentage point yearly rise by the capacity utilization rate and its projected 1.1 point average annual increase over the next seven quarters very much disputes a continuation of Q1-2014’s -3.0% yearly decline by core profits, never mind a deeper decline of -3.5% for yearlong 2014.

SENTIMENT WATCH

In my Monday article (click for link) I highlighted how the market’s advance was strengthening and broadening out as the biggest sectors of the market that had lagged for the greater part of the year were beginning to gather momentum and become short-term leaders. Although this is a constructive development, I warned how the market was getting a little overheated as several of my intermediate-timing gauges had reached frothy levels, implying we either consolidate or experience a small pullback.

This was further confirmed this week as a number of major market indices received a Bloomberg TrendStall “sell signal” (see red triangles) as shown below.

market top

(…) The five investment advisers with the best records over the past decade at calling market turns believe stocks are headed higher. They currently are recommending that 83% of their clients’ U.S. equity portfolios be invested in stocks, with the balance allocated to money-market funds. (By contrast, the average figure was 66% for the market timers among the more than 200 advisers tracked by the Hulbert Financial Digest.)

It’s worth considering their views, since each has exhibited a rare ability to capture rallies and sidestep declines in the portfolios they recommend to clients. (…)

But Mr. Schannep says that anxiety about a correction should not dictate investment decisions. “Far more money has been lost by investors trying to anticipate corrections than has been lost in all the corrections combined,” he says, quoting Peter Lynch, who for two decades through the mid-1990s managed Fidelity Magellan, then the top-performing U.S. stock-mutual fund.

How long will the current bull market last before it eventually succumbs to a correction—or worse? Mr. Schannep says it’s impossible to know. He says that indicators are more important than targets, and for now his indicators continue to point up.

Among the other market timers we track, there is concern about the widespread complacency—if not exuberance—currently prevailing on Wall Street. Mr. Sullivan says that optimism isn’t an automatic kiss of death, and that there have been many times in the past when a strongly bullish consensus turned out to be right.

He believes this will be one of those times, since his technical models—both for the shorter and longer terms—are in a bullish mode.

We chose the past decade as the time period over which to identify the best and worst timers, since it includes not only the strong bull market over the past five years but also the punishing 2007-09 bear market. Regardless, the top performers for any period, from as short as the past 12 months to as long as the past 20 years, are bullish.

What’s more, the 10% of market timers with the worst records—when measured over all time periods from short- to long-term—are quite bearish right now, both in their own right and relative to the top-performing timers. To be out of the stock market right now, you therefore have to bet that those timers who in the past have been most wrong are now uncharacteristically going to get it right.

The implication: Stay invested in stocks. Mr. Sullivan believes that this advice applies even to those who have missed out on the run-up in recent years by being in cash. It isn’t too late, in other words, to invest in this bull market, he says. (…)

(…) With a rather anaemic economy, the central bank is willing to trade higher financial instability down the road for greater economic healing in the present; and it believes (or more accurately hopes) that the recent strengthening in macroprudential regulation will prove sufficient to limit such financial instability should it materialise.

All this suggests that, rather than continuously increasing exposure to ever rising markets, it is time for highly exposed investors to gradually take some chips off the table.

They also need to monitor the liquidity of portfolios carefully, as it makes less and less sense to give up their flexibility to reposition for what is a low reward for assuming large liquidity risks. And, in taking long positions in markets, they should guard against falling hostage to a “relative” valuation mindset that overwhelms any assessments of the overall compensation for risk.

In their efforts to promote growth and jobs, central banks are trading the possibility of immediate economic gains for a growing risk of financial instability later. This does not necessarily mean investors should rush for the exits, immediately and in size. But it does call for the type of incremental prudence that today’s marketplace appears overly hesitant to adopt given the recent evolution of market prices.

(…) And with the 2014 calendar nearly half way done, and the macro hedge fund community not only underperforming the S&P 500 for the 6th year in a row, but generating a negative return YTD, what is a macro hedge fund universe to do? Why lose all pretense of being sophisticated fundamental trend pickers and do what Bernanke and Yellen have been forcing everyone to do from day one: go all in stocks of course! According to JPM as of this moment there is no difference in the positioning of both traditional long/short hedge funds and macro funds, both of which have increased their equity exposure to the highest since May 2011!

From JPM:

Our hedge fund beta monitor shows a proxy for Macro and Equity long/short hedge fund equity exposure. This proxy is constructed by the rolling 21-day beta of macro hedge fund returns with respect to returns on the S&P500 index. Macro hedge funds are a $500bn plus universe and account for around 19% of total hedge fund assets. This beta shows that both macro hedge funds and equity long/short hedge funds have increased their equity exposure recently to the highest since May 2011.

What does this mean? Well, unless corporate buybacks are about to have their greatest quarter in history, virtually all the “macro hedge fund” money on the sidelines, to use the most idiotic phrase in existence, was just allocated to stocks in the past three weeks. Which also means that there is nobody left to buy. However, with the global geopolitical situation getting worse by the day, there may suddenly be quite a few willing to sell.

  • Growth is not particularly strong anywhere, but it’s positive everywhere. (ISI)

Meanwhile, some buyers keep seeing value out there…

Priceline Latest in High-Premium Buyers

Priceline Group Inc. has become the latest in a string of companies paying high premiums for acquisitions as the M&A market heats up.

The online travel service agreed to buy restaurant booking service OpenTable Inc. on Friday for $103 a share. That represents a 47% premium to OpenTable’s share price a week earlier. Surprised smile

The premium is higher than the average 34% one-week premium paid by acquirers in deals over $100 million this year, according to Dealogic. That’s up from the 29% average from this point last year. (…)

Priceline’s chief executive Darren Huston said the company’s management spent “a lot of time” evaluating OpenTable and decided the price was worth it.

However, he and finance chief Daniel Finnegan provided few details to analysts in a morning conference call. Mr. Finnegan, for example, said the transaction would be “slightly accretive” this year, but didn’t say by how much.

The $2.6 billion in cash Priceline is paying represents about 51 times forward earnings for the 16-year-old company, which provides online-reservation systems to restaurants.

Let’s hope they have spent enough time evaluating because they are paying $2.6B in cash! Hopefully, the fact that it is “slightly accretive” was not the clincher. Cash earns so little these days that just about any deal using cash is accretive (PCLN is full of cash). The key question to PCLN management is what does the deal do to return on capital.

PCLN sells at 5.5x assets which return 21%. It is buying OPEN at 7.7x assets returning 11%. Better have lots of synergies to offset the dilution…

Winking smile Chart Of The Day: All The President’s Golf Games

 

For his defense, George W. was busy reading.