The enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it’s the illusion of knowledge (Stephen Hawking)

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so (Mark Twain)

Invest with smart knowledge and objective odds

THE DAILY EDGE: 9 NOVEMBER 2020: A Vaccine!

S&P futures hit record as Pfizer says vaccine effective Futures tracking the S&P 500 hit a record high on Monday after Pfizer said its experimental vaccine was more than 90% effective in preventing COVID-19 based on initial data from a large study.

The companies said they have so far found no serious safety concerns and expect to seek U.S. emergency use authorization later this month. (…) Positive trial results could lead to shot being available for use by end of the year

Bloomberg:

(…) The findings are based on an interim analysis conducted after 94 participants contracted Covid-19. The trial will continue until 164 cases have occurred. If the data hold up and a key safety readout Pfizer expects in about a week also looks good, it could mean that the world has a vital new tool to control a pandemic that has killed more than 1.2 million people worldwide. (…)

The data do have limits. For now, few details on the vaccine’s efficacy are available. It isn’t known how well the shot works in key subgroups, such as the elderly. Those analyses haven’t been conducted. And it isn’t known whether the vaccine prevents severe disease, as none of the participants who got Covid-19 in this round of analysis had severe cases, Gruber said.

However, the strong reading from the first large-scale trial to post efficacy results bodes well for other experimental vaccines, in particular one being developed by Moderna Inc. that uses similar technology. Its big trial could generate efficacy and safety results in weeks. If that study succeeds as well, there could be two vaccines available in the U.S. by around year-end.

Pfizer expects to get two months of safety follow-up data, a key metric required by U.S. regulators before an emergency authorization is granted, in the third week in November. If those findings raise no problems, Pfizer could apply for an authorization in the U.S. this month. (…)

So far, the trial’s data monitoring committee has identified no serious safety concerns, Pfizer and BioNTech said. (…)

Fall in Jobless Rate Shows Healing Labor Market Economy added 638,000 jobs in October and the jobless rate fell a percentage point to 6.9%

The job market has now recovered 12.1 million of the 22 million jobs lost in March and April, when the shutdown of businesses led the jobless rate to soar to a post-World War II high of 14.7%.

October’s job gain would have been higher without the release of temporary census workers from public payrolls. Private-sector employers added 906,000 jobs last month, a pickup from September, more than offsetting a drop of 268,000 jobs in the public sector. Industries that hired the most workers last month included leisure and hospitality—particularly restaurants—retail and construction.

Actually, 271k, 30% of new private jobs, were in leisure and hospitality, not particularly buoyant sectors as the pandemic continues.

This chart plots total employment levels and private and local government employment all indexed at 100 in February, all still down about 7% and swooshing:

fredgraph - 2020-11-07T073545.455

The Payrolls Index (employment x hours x wages) is closely correlated with growth in consumer expenditures. Down 6.9% YoY, weak labor income could weigh heavily on Holiday spending.

fredgraph - 2020-11-07T083304.202

Revolving credit is down $90 Billion (-10.7%) since February and is down 10.6% YoY. Weak labor income, declining credit demand…who’s really betting on a sharp decline in the savings rate to save Christmas?

fredgraph - 2020-11-07T143202.133

Deloitte’s holiday retail report reveals that 38% of Americans intend to spend less during this holiday season than last year with 40% aiming at boosting their savings. In total, shoppers expect to spend $1,387 per household during the holiday season this year, down -7% YoY:

Still, job growth has slowed each month since June. And optimism about Friday’s report—which was derived from surveys in mid-October—was tempered by more recent data showing falling employment at small businesses and slower hiring in service industries overall.

(…) temporary workers accounted for one in six new jobs last month, a sign employers remain cautious about the outlook.

In October, 3.7 million Americans said they were unemployed due to a permanent job loss, the Labor Department said. That exceeded the number who said they were on a temporary layoff, at 3.2 million, for the first time since February. That suggests that while millions of Americans have been recalled to jobs they lost this spring, most of those still unemployed will need to find new work, a challenging prospect at time when the economy appears to be downshifting into a slower phase of the recovery. (…)

fredgraph - 2020-11-07T072302.431

The labor market faces several potential obstacles that could slow the expansion. The rise in virus infections could prompt cities and states to shut down businesses again and consumers to stay at home, cutting their spending on services.

Winter weather could also hurt industries such as restaurants that have been serving patrons outside. And the looming expiration of emergency jobless benefits could cause consumers to reduce spending, in turn pressuring employers to reduce costs by laying off employees.

Among the hardest hit could be restaurants, which were among the first to rehire but could be the first to lay people off if the economy deteriorates. Restaurant hiring accounted for some of the biggest overall job gains last month. (…)

Goldman Sachs, naturally, sees the glass half-full:

The spike in unemployment during the pandemic reflected a sharp increase in temporarily laid off workers, a pattern which has historically been associated with a rapid labor market recovery. Indeed, the recall of workers—most of whom never searched for new employment—to their prior jobs drove the labor market recovery in the first few months. Even after the significant rehiring reported in the household survey of today’s employment report, over 43% of the newly unemployed workers since the virus shock still report being on temporary layoff.

But the lines have crossed (see chart above) and 57% are now permanently unemployed. Moreover, 59% of remaining laid-off employees are actually looking for a job, meaning they are not hopeful the be recalled.

Private job openings have been falling since January 2019. They fell 9.6% since February 2020 and are 12.3% below their February 2019 level.

Manufacturing employment has fared better but remains almost 5% below February’s level compared with 7% for services. Unfortunately, manufacturing only employs 12 million people, ten times fewer than services. Restaurants and bars employ 10.2 million people, down 2.1 million since February, or 23% of all service-providing job losses.

fredgraph - 2020-11-07T074211.595

If people opt to use their savings, consumption (some 70% of the economy) could be sustained but this might be asking much with the enduring pandemic and other worries such as

For all 50 states combined, revenue declines for 2020 and 2021 could reach 13% cumulatively, according to Moody’s Analytics projections, while the average cost of an employer health-care plan for an individual increased 4% in 2020 to $7,470, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation nonprofit. (…)

While state governments have legal protections for their workers’ pension plans, not all have protections for retiree health plans. (…)

For those prospective retirees who have yet to qualify for Medicare, medical-benefit cuts can mean working longer hours for more years, or even picking up another job. (…)

Could a President-elect Biden save Christmas? So far, there are no signs of any cooperation from Trump. And since the Senate, for now at least, remains Republican, we can only hope for a small deal, if any, but likely not in time for this Christmas.

The Republican senator told a news conference in Kentucky that the fall to a 6.9% jobless rate, combined with recent evidence of overall economic growth, showed the U.S. economy is experiencing a dramatic recovery.

“I think it reinforces the argument that I’ve been making for the last few months, that something smaller – rather than throwing another $3 trillion at this issue – is more appropriate,” McConnell told reporters. (…)

But his call for a narrow package was quickly rejected by House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a Democrat, who has been working to broker a COVID-19 stimulus deal near the $2 trillion mark with Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin.

“It doesn’t appeal to me at all, because they still have not agreed to crush the virus. If you don’t crush the virus, we’re still going to have to be dealing with the consequences of the virus,” Pelosi told a news conference on Capitol Hill.

“That isn’t anything that we should even be looking at. It wasn’t the right thing before,” she added. (…)

Pelosi insisted that any agreement must include effective support for testing, tracing and vaccine development, as well as aid to state and local governments. Trump and his Republican allies have balked at Democratic demands for state and local aid, calling it a bailout for Democratic-run states and cities.

China Car Sales Go From Strength to Strength as Virus Eases

Retail sales of cars, SUVs and multiple-purpose vehicles increased 8% from a year earlier to 2.02 million units in October, the China Passenger Car Association said Monday. Wholesales of new energy vehicles, which includes electric cars, more than doubled to 144,000 units. (…) Annual passenger-vehicle sales will still show a decline of about 7% this year, PCA predicted, after large drops during the height of the pandemic. That’s better than the 11% decline PCA projected in July. (…)

image
Germany Considers Delaying a $4 Billion Tariff Strike on the U.S.

(…) “We need a large and broad industrial tariff deal between the U.S. and the EU,” German Economy Minister Peter Altmaier said on Monday. “Such an offer is on the table, and it is more than fair that we give the U.S. administration the opportunity to prepare itself for it once it is in office,” he said Monday on Deutschlandfunk radio.

German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas said over the weekend that his government would make “concrete proposals” to Washington on how to improve the relationship and that a “new deal” was needed. (…)

The decision on the timing of any tariffs will ultimately be made by the European Commission, the bloc’s executive authority. Valdis Dombrovskis, the EU’s trade chief, said they would move ahead with their plans.

“The U.S. has imposed their tariffs following the WTO ruling in the Airbus case, now we have a WTO ruling also in the Boeing case allowing us to impose our tariffs and that’s what we are doing,” Dombrovskis said on Monday before the trade ministers’ video conference, adding that the EU could suspend or withdraw the tariffs at any time. (…)

Not all EU members agree with Germany’s position. France, which has been suffering under American tariffs since last year, is pushing for a quick retaliation. French Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire said over the weekend that a Joe Biden administration would likely take a less aggressive stance in the Boeing dispute, but that Europe should not drop its guard. (…)

“The U.S. remains in a confrontation with China, and Europe must therefore assert its economic and political sovereignty in this power game.” (…)

To date, the U.S. has refrained from applying the maximum tariff level in the $7.5 billion damages award from the WTO last year. A lame duck Trump administration could raise those import taxes to 100%, which for many European products would effectively block their entry into the U.S. marketplace. (…)

Imports affected by export demand from Covid-19 outside China

China’s imports grew 4.7% YoY though contracted by US$24 billion from September to October, which is equivalent to an 11.8% MoM fall. Almost every import item experienced a contraction on a monthly basis. Integrated circuits, the single biggest reported import item, contracted by 15% MoM, which also reflects that the strong growth of smartphone exports may not be sustained in the coming months.

This change could be the start of a new trend, rather than just a single data point, as export demand has been strongly affected by the return to Covid-19 lockdowns in some major contries outside China. It is possible that this will weaken Chinese export orders for Christmas.

0_All Key Metrics (41)

1R_Reg Positive (12)

EARNINGS WATCH
Rebounding Profits Fortify Stock Rally U.S. companies have trounced expectations this earnings season, potentially laying the foundation for the next leg of the market’s rally, which has been led by tech companies including Apple.

With most of the companies in the S&P 500 reporting, analysts are projecting third-quarter profits fell 7.5% from a year earlier, according to FactSet. That is a sharp improvement from the 21% decline they forecast at the end of September. (…)

But the earnings beats are widespread, with 86% of reporting S&P 500 companies having exceeded estimates. Analysts have lifted third-quarter expectations for all 11 S&P 500 sectors.

Among the groups to see major shifts, the communications services group, which includes Facebook and Alphabet, is projected to record a 2.3% increase in profits from a year earlier, compared with expectations at the end of September for a drop of 21%. Buoyed by stay-at-home trends, both companies reported strong earnings last month.

The consumer staples group is expected to see an earnings increase of 4%, a reversal from an anticipated decline of 4.9%.

Analysts expect earnings will decline 11% year over year in the fourth quarter before beginning to climb again in the first quarter of 2021. (…)

The facts from Refinitiv:

Through Nov. 6, 445 companies in the S&P 500 Index have reported earnings for Q3 2020. Of these companies, 85.4% reported earnings above analyst expectations and 11.5% reported earnings below analyst expectations. In a typical quarter (since 1994), 65% of companies beat estimates and 20% miss estimates. Over the past four quarters, 73% of companies beat the estimates and 21% missed estimates.

In aggregate, companies are reporting earnings that are 19.5% above estimates, which compares to a long-term (since 1994) average surprise factor of 3.5% and the average surprise factor over the prior four quarters of 8.7%.

Of these companies, 78.6% reported revenue above analyst expectations and 21.4% reported revenue below analyst expectations. In a
typical quarter (since 2002), 60% of companies beat estimates and 39% miss estimates. Over the past four quarters, 61% of companies beat the estimates and 39% missed estimates.

In aggregate, companies are reporting revenue that are 2.5% above estimates, which compares to a long-term (since 2002) average surprise factor of 1.5% and the average surprise factor over the prior four quarters of 1.1%.

The estimated earnings growth rate for the S&P 500 for 20Q3 is -7.8%. If the energy sector is excluded, the growth rate improves to -3.7%. The estimated revenue growth rate for the S&P 500 for 20Q3 is -2.5%. If the energy sector is excluded, the growth rate improves to 0.7%.

The estimated earnings growth rate for the S&P 500 for 20Q4 is -11.1%. If the energy sector is excluded, the growth rate improves to -8.1%.image

image

image

image

Full year 2020 estimates are now $136.23. 2021: $168.22.

Corporate Insider Buying Plummets: Bad Portent? Executives last month purchased lowest amount in four years.

(…) In October, only 396 executives bought their employer’s shares, the lowest level in four years. Purchasing last month lagged behind selling, which also has ebbed to a degree, by the most since January.

Last month, in dollar terms, US insiders purchased $74.3 million worth of shares, down 43% from September, Bloomberg says, after tabulating the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings. The group’s selling slid 29% to $1.67 billion. (…)

In March, when the market crashed, the execs’ buying exploded, with buyers more than doubling. There were 3,111 of them, versus 1,417 sellers—a reversal of their usual behavior toward employer stock. (…)

INK tallies companies with buy only transactions divided by companies with sell only transactions of direct ownership non-derivative equity
securities by officers and directors filed over the last 60 days. 100% = buyers = sellers; 50% = 1 buyer for every 2 sellers.

image

BTW, U.S. technology displays the lowest reading at 12%: 8.5 sellers for every buyer. Only 2 tech stock made INK’s top 50 insider buy lists (FUBO and IBM). Wanna know how many made the top 50 sell list? 19. Consumer cyclicals on the top 50 sell list? 6 (AMZN, AZEK, DKNG,TSLA, NKE, PTON).

The only 2 sectors with net positive buying: Financials (142%) and Energy (121%).

Chinese Property Giant Evergrande Drops Unit Listing China Evergrande, the heavily indebted property developer, scrapped plans to list a key unit after striking deals with co-investors that should avert a near-term cash crunch.
Georgia’s Two Runoff Races Become Focus for Senate Control Republicans want to maintain at least one Senate seat from the state to try to preserve the GOP’s majority in the chamber

The partisan breakdown in the Senate is currently a tie, with 48 Republicans and 48 Democrats. Four seats are still outstanding: In addition to the Georgia runoffs, Republicans are leading and expected to win in Alaska and North Carolina, but those races haven’t been called yet by the Associated Press because votes are still being counted.

If Republicans hold their seats in Alaska and North Carolina, Democrats would need to win both of the Georgia runoff races on Jan. 5 to control 50 seats in the chamber. That would give their party majority control since Vice President-elect Kamala Harris, in her role as president of the Senate, could cast any tiebreaking votes. (…)

A key question is whether Democrats will show up for the runoffs in the same numbers that they did in the general election. A nonpartisan study of the history of runoffs in Georgia found that, going back to 1988, there have been seven statewide runoff elections. Democrats won only one of them—and that was more than 20 years ago, in 1998. (…)

Divided Governments Are Supposed to Be Good for Stocks. The Data Don’t Support That.

(…) In the 45 years that the same party controlled Congress and the White House, the average return on the S&P 500 was 7.45%, according to Dow Jones Market Data. In the 46 years that power was split, the average return was 7.26%. (…)

Going back to 1929, the most common power structure in Washington has seen Democrats controlling the White House and both chambers of Congress. The S&P 500 rose an above-average 9.4% annually in those 34 years.

The next-most-common was a division in which Republicans controlled the White House and Democrats oversaw both houses of Congress. The market’s annual return in those 22 years was a below-average 4.9%. (…)

Interestingly, there has been no time frame when Democrats controlled the White House and House of Representatives and Republicans held the Senate. (…)

“The bottom line is that the sample size isn’t large enough to draw a firm conclusion,” Mr. McLoughlin said. “As a colleague said to me, ‘Come back in 500 years and we’ll talk.’”

THE DAILY EDGE: 6 NOVEMBER 2020: Sweep?

Nonfarm payroll employment rises by 638,000 in October; unemployment rate declines to 6.9%

Total nonfarm payroll employment rose by 638,000 in October and has increased for 6 consecutive months. In October, nonfarm employment was below its February level by 10.1 million, or 6.6 percent. (…)

The change in total nonfarm payroll employment for August was revised up by 4,000 from +1,489,000 to +1,493,000, and the change for September was revised up by 11,000 from +661,000 to +672,000. With these revisions, employment in August and September combined was 15,000 higher than previously reported. (…)

In October, the unemployment rate declined by 1.0 percentage point to 6.9 percent, and the number of unemployed persons fell by 1.5 million to 11.1 million. Both measures have declined for 6 consecutive months but are nearly twice their February levels (3.5 percent and 5.8 million, respectively). (…)

The labor force participation rate increased by 0.3 percentage point to 61.7 percent in October; this is 1.7 percentage points below the February level. The employment-population ratio increased by 0.8 percentage point to 57.4 percent in October but is 3.7 percentage points lower than in February. (…)

In October, 15.1 million persons reported that they had been unable to work because their employer closed or lost business due to the pandemic—that is, they did not work at all or worked fewer hours at some point in the last 4 weeks due to the pandemic. This measure is down from 19.4 million in September. Among those who reported in October that they were unable to work because of pandemic related closures or lost business, 11.7 percent received at least some pay from their employer for the hours not worked, up from 10.3 percent in September.

The above employment report reaches mid-October. Here are the more recent trends:

  • U.S. Unemployment Claims Held Nearly Steady Last Week The number of people applying for jobless benefits has trended down in recent weeks, suggesting the pace of layoffs eased despite a resurgence in new coronavirus cases and the return of some economic restrictions.

Weekly initial claims for jobless benefits fell by 7,000 to a seasonally adjusted 751,000 in the week ended Oct. 31, the Labor Department said Thursday. That was the lowest level since mid-March, but was well above the 217,000 claims filed in late February, before economic shutdowns to control the spread of the new coronavirus began.

The previous week’s data were revised up by 7,000 to 758,000. (…)

Haver Analytics plots trends in each of the three unemployment programs:

image

Axios stacks them up to show the changing split among the 22 million recipients:

unnamed (94)

Data: U.S. Department of Labor; Chart: Andrew Witherspoon/Axios

(…) data from the Labor Department showed more than 1 million people filed for first-time jobless benefits for the 33rd week in a row. More than 738,000 people applied for first-time traditional unemployment benefits last week and nearly 363,000 applied for benefits through the Pandemic Unemployment Assistance program. The rate of unemployment filings has been remarkably high for a remarkable amount of time. (…) unemployment benefits are starting to run out for more people and will expire for all of the nearly 14 million Americans on pandemic programs at the end of the year.

  • Morning Consult survey data in October shows that a persistently high share of American adults lost pay or income over the course of the month. This finding is consistent with the high volume of weekly initial unemployment insurance claims over the past five weeks.
    The share of Americans living in households with annual incomes over $100,000 who reported losing pay or income rose from 11.5 percent to 14.2 percent from Oct. 3-Oct. 31, reversing the downward trend over the prior 23 weeks.

image

Fed Says Virus Poses Considerable Risks, Keeps Low-Rate Vow The Federal Reserve said the coronavirus pandemic poses considerable risks for the U.S. economy despite recent gains, and officials made no changes to their commitment to provide sustained stimulus.

Fed Chairman Jerome Powell said they were monitoring two prominent risks to the recent rebound in economic activity: one from rising infection rates and another from households exhausting savings after earlier fiscal relief measures had dissipated.

“Economic activity has continued to recover” but “the pace of improvement has moderated,” Mr. Powell said at a news conference. (…)

Mr. Powell said the recent upswing in virus cases was “particularly concerning” and said steps such as wearing masks in public would help the economy. Still, he indicated policy makers have been surprised through the late summer and early fall by the degree to which economic activity held up despite higher infection counts. (…)

Officials also discussed whether to provide additional support by adjusting the composition of those purchases to target longer-term Treasury yields, as they did in their 2012-14 asset-buying program.

But several Fed officials have said the low level of long-term Treasury yields makes this unnecessary. And Mr. Powell said the current program, due to its larger size, was pushing down longer-dated yields even without explicitly targeting them. (…)

U.S. Cases Top 120,000 in a Day The number of people dying of Covid-19 is increasing again as well. More than 1,200 deaths were reported on Thursday, according to Johns Hopkins data, a figure not seen since mid-September.

Thursday’s 121,888 newly reported infections, according to data compiled by Johns Hopkins University, bring the U.S. total to more than 9.6 million. The tally is 18.5% higher than the previous record high, Wednesday’s count of 102,831. It is the third day in a week the U.S. has set a daily record. Last Friday’s tally was 99,321.

With 53,322 people hospitalized, a number not seen since early August, hospitals in the South and Midwest are scrambling to accommodate a surge of new patients. Face masks are once again in short supply in many parts of the country. (…)

8_US Cross Curves (21)

THE ELECTIONS
  • Polls were mostly very wrong. Or were they? The “10-point lead” may have incited many voters to split their ticket to avoid a sweep and a clearly leftist government for 4 years.
  • Even Hispanics, wary of “socialists and communists”, helped Trump in two very key states, Florida and Texas.
  • Pandemic management was not as critical as many thought. It’s the economy, stupid! In the last 10 days, Trump focused on the economy and “socialist dems”.
  • Results: a weaker Democrat House, and a (potentially) adversarial Republican Senate. Biden, if elected, but particularly Sanders, Warren and AOC might not rock any boat.
  • Bipartisan areas: infrastructure, China, Big Tech.
  • In all, no clear winner but, perhaps, democracy. Wisdom, or luck?

But wait, wait!

The fight for control of the U.S. Senate now is centered on Georgia, where the state’s close election has pushed at least one, and possibly two, of its Senate races to Jan. 5 runoffs.

The outcome of those two races could shift the balance of power in the Senate, as Democrat Jon Ossoff tries to unseat Republican Sen. David Perdue, and Democrat Raphael Warnock faces off against Republican Sen. Kelly Loeffler. (…)

Under Georgia law, if no candidate gets more than 50%, the two top vote getters, regardless of party, compete in a runoff to be held on Jan. 5.

The Warnock-Loeffler race already is headed for a runoff, as the Associated Press projected Tuesday. Mr. Perdue’s share of the vote was at 49.88% as of late Thursday, with about 16,105 outstanding ballots still to be counted, according to the Georgia Secretary of State’s Office. Mr. Ossoff was at 47.81%. Some provisional and military ballots are also yet to be counted.

Based on results so far nationwide, Republicans will control 48 seats next year, and they lead in two other states—North Carolina and Alaska. Democrats so far have locked down 48 seats, leaving the two Georgia races as their best hopes to reach 50.

If Democrat Joe Biden wins the White House, vice-presidential nominee Kamala Harris would cast a tiebreaking vote when needed. (…)

It might be a sweep after all…

The War of the Norm

By: George Friedman

The primary reason about half the country voted for Joe Biden was that he wasn’t Donald Trump. Trump was seen by many as violating fundamental norms of the presidency and of personal dignity. Biden had not introduced any stunning policy initiatives, nor did his supporters necessarily want him to. What they wanted was a return to the norm, as represented by Barack Obama, George W. Bush and others. They wanted a return to what they saw as moral rectitude and propriety, a country united rather than divided.

On the other hand, just under half the country voted for Trump because they saw the norm as unbearable. On the surface, it seemed to represent civility. Underneath, for them, it was a ruthless attempt to enhance the power of the elite and assault the values of the country. Put differently, the norm was seen as a way to manipulate society for the benefit of the elite, who covered their actions with mock civility. In the view of Trump supporters, the norm divided the country deeply, against the Trump voters’ interests and values.

For Biden voters, supporting Trump was inconceivable, since he was in it for himself and stood for the lowest values possible. For Trump supporters, not voting for Trump was inconceivable, since he represented resistance against hypocrisy and the ruthlessness of the elite as they accumulated power. Trump’s supporters knew that he lied. They argued that all politicians lied, but that their lies were subtle and hidden. Trump’s were open. Given a choice between the two, they voted for Trump. Trump’s enemies thought this attitude abnormal, seeing open and self-serving lies as destructive and denying that the American norm had become systematic but subtle dishonesty.

At the time of writing, the election is a virtual tie: Biden has about 50 percent of the national vote, and Trump one to two points less. For Biden supporters, this is a disappointment, though not a fatal one. The polls showed Biden with a substantial lead over Trump. For Trump voters, these polls were not only in error but deliberately so, seeking to portray America as in revolt against the Trump presidency. For them, the polls were simply another lie of the norm. What for Biden voters was a statistical anomaly was for Trump voters another case in a long line of deception. And so too, according to them, was the voting system put in place because of the COVID-19 crisis.

Biden voters argue that these conspiracy theories are lies destroying national unity. Trump voters argue that they are simply a representation of what is going on in the country. The voting rules and polls were what would normally be expected under the circumstances. But Trump voters viewed these rules and polls as being justified by a norm that concocts rules that benefit the powers that be.

Obviously not all Biden and Trump voters approached the election this way. No single statement exhausts the complexity of the vote. But I think that, on the whole, what divided the country was the gap between the hunger for a return to what some considered the norm, and the demand that the old norm be overthrown and a new one forged. Thus what Biden voters see as normal processes are unbearable to Trump voters.

The issue is not who is right. The issue is that this country, judging by the vote, is divided down the middle. The tally is an important marker for who wins and loses, but in a broader sense the social split finds half the country on each side. The malice toward the other side varies. There is likely a spectrum of loathing, from merely disagreeing with each other to seeing the other side as the embodiment of evil. But the core distinction is that one side regards their antagonists as abnormal, while the other side views their antagonists as the normal purveyors of skillful oppression.

This can’t be understood by recourse to policies. The mutual loathing points to fundamental differences on existential questions, such as the nature of truth, the definition of freedom and the meaning of citizenship. And that in turn is rooted in the fundamental social and economic shifts of the past 50 years. As the transformation takes place, demonstrators sit outside the building in Georgia where ballots are counted, with the Biden supporters unable to grasp that the protesters genuinely believe the election, among other things, is being stolen. Meanwhile in Portland, the response to the election by the radical left is breaking windows and destroying ATMs. They also are disgusted by the election, as they too despise the norm. They are a small fraction of the left – but in these times the opponents of the norm are powerful.

The fact is that the old norm is gone. Its economic foundation is old and tired, and the companies founded in garages 50 years ago are the General Motors of our time. People who had had comfortable lives working at GM are now threatened with penury, while a new elite is as indifferent to their fate as new elites always are.

It is a time of pain that will not go away until a new normal is established. Franklin D. Roosevelt was considered a freak – a rich man championing the immigrant working class. So too was Ronald Reagan – an actor, disengaged and not too bright, cutting taxes for the rich. We are years before the Roosevelt or Reagan of our time emerges, but one will. In the meantime, the only choice we have is between laughter and tears at how history is tearing at our beloved country. But since we have been here before, I suggest a good chuckle. Since we are unable to change the course, we may as well enjoy it.

A few days after the 2016 election, I asked Bill, a small contractor working on my house, if he was happy with a Trump presidency. He said he was a life Democrat but he voted for Trump because he was desperate for changes. “I am making the same money as 20 years ago working twice as hard.” Taxes and regulations were killing him. His hopes that “conventional politicians” would eventually do something good for him had vanished. “They’re all the same. Let’s see what happens with Trump. We can always boot him out in 4 years.”

I can’t be sure but I suspect Bill voted Trump again.