U.S. Retail Sales Fall for First Time Since March as Holiday Season Approaches Declining spending adds to signs the economy is cooling after hot summer
U.S. retail sales fell 0.1% in October from a month earlier, the Commerce Department said Wednesday. That is the first decline since March and comes after a 0.9% increase in September and robust gains earlier in the summer. (…)
Americans spent less at auto dealerships as higher interest rates could deter some from making big-ticket purchases. Declining prices at the pump resulted in less spending at gas stations. But even when excluding those categories, sales advanced just 0.1%, after averaging a 0.6% gain in the prior six months. (…)
Sales also declined in October at department, hardware and furniture stores and rose more slowly at restaurants and bars and online.
One of the nation’s largest retailers, Target, said Wednesday that consumers continue to pull back on discretionary items that make up much of its annual revenue.
(…)Target’s comparable sales, those from stores and digital channels operating at least 12 months, fell 4.9% in the three months ended Oct. 28 from the prior year. (…)
Comparable food sales fell in the quarter due to slightly lower prices, while sales by units rose, said Hennington.
Home Depot said Tuesday that same-store sales fell 3.1% last quarter. “We saw continued customer engagement with smaller projects, and experienced pressure in certain big-ticket, discretionary categories,” Chief Executive Ted Decker said. (…)

- How Consumers Are Spending Is a Reason for Cheer Retail spending data is a lot better than the headline figures suggest
(…) Indeed, the composition of retail spending in October was more favorable than what the headline figure on Wednesday’s report showed. Sales excluding gasoline stations, car dealers, building-materials stores and food services—the so-called control group that economists use to track the underlying pace of consumer spending—rose 0.2% in October from a month earlier.
Don’t forget what is going on with prices, either. Tuesday’s benign inflation report from the Labor Department showed that consumer prices were unchanged in October from September. Overall prices for goods—what gets sold in stores—fell by 0.4%, while goods prices stripping out food and energy items slipped 0.1%. (…)
As an added bonus, gasoline prices have continued to decline: As of Monday, the average price for a gallon of regular was $3.35, according to the Energy Information Administration, which compared with an October average of $3.61. (…)
Retail inflation was +0.4% YoY in October (0.35*CPI Durables + 0.658 CPI ND) against nominal sales up 2.5%. On a MoM basis, retail inflation was -0.6% against nominal sales -0.1%. Real sales are still positive per these measures.
My measure of CPI-Essentials (food, energy, shelter, weighted) remains high at +4.6% YoY in October, down from 5.4% in September but above June’s 4.1%. But October was flat MoM after averaging +0.7% in August/September.
CPI-ESSENTIALS & CORE CPI
Flat nominal retail sales were in line with aggregate payrolls (0.0% MoM) in October, indicating that Americans did not dissave or borrow much last month.
The consumer income math:
jobs: (jobs + hrs) 0.8 – 1.5% (1.4% last 3 ms, 1.1% last 2, -1.2% in Oct)
wages: 3.0 – 4.0% (3.2% last 3 and 2 ms, 2.5% in Oct)
PCE inflation: 3.0 – 4.0% (3.8% last 3 ms, 4.4% last 2, 4.3% in Sept.)
= real labor inc. 0.8 – 1.5%
Even the higher end 1.5% growth rate (black dash) is historically very weak, 0.5% is terrible.
US Producer Prices Decline by Most Since April 2020 on Gasoline Prices paid to producers sank 0.5% in October, core unchanged
(…) Services costs, meanwhile, were flat after rising six straight months. (…)
Global Fight Against Inflation Turns a Corner Falling inflation across industrialized countries opens the door for central banks to start cutting interest rates next year.
Declines in consumer price growth, to below 5% in the U.K. last month and around 3% in the U.S. and eurozone, are fueling expectations that central banks could take their feet off the brakes and pivot to cutting interest rates next year.
That would provide welcome relief to a global economy that is struggling outside the U.S., increasing the prospects of a soft landing from a historic series of interest-rate increases without large increases in unemployment. Europe, in particular, is on the brink of recession.
Yields on government debt in Europe and the U.S. have slumped as investors start to price in earlier interest-rate cuts.
For months this year, economists puzzled over why growth and inflation hadn’t slowed more in response to interest-rate hikes. Now, there is growing evidence that higher borrowing costs are biting hard with a delay. (…)
Even countries where inflation has proved the most stubborn, such as the U.K., have started to show progress. Consumer prices rose 4.6% in October compared with the year-ago month, a drop from the 6.7% rate of inflation recorded in September and the slowest increase since October 2021, the statistics agency said Wednesday. Economists had expected to see a decline to 4.8%. (…)
The eurozone also reported a decline in inflation to 2.9% in October from 4.3% in September. Consumer prices were lower than a year earlier in Belgium and the Netherlands. (…)
Investors are also more optimistic. They are pricing in interest-rate cuts by the Federal Reserve and European Central Bank starting next spring, and by the Bank of England next summer, according to data from Refinitiv.
Markets had priced a 30% probability of another rate increase by the Fed, from its current level of 5.25% to 5.5%, until publication of U.S. inflation data on Tuesday. That probability has now fallen to 5%, according to Deutsche Bank analysts. The prospect of a Fed rate cut by May soared from 23% on Monday to 86% by Tuesday‘s close.
Central bankers are more cautious after being surprised last year by the persistence of inflation. The Bank of England last month said it is too soon to think about cutting interest rates, having forecast that inflation would reach its 2% target in late 2025. Central bankers also point to the still-rapid rise in wages and the risk of higher energy prices if the conflict between Israel and Hamas spreads to other parts of the Middle East. (…)
Fitch says US regional bank challenges to persist in 2024
“Regional banks lacking in scale will be disproportionately pressured to reduce cost bases and optimize loan composition,” Fitch said on Wednesday, adding this would “diminish their ratings headroom, leaving larger players relatively well-positioned to continue to gain market share.”
Fitch said that a delay in meaningful loosening of monetary policy would likely translate into “sustained competition for deposits” and “stubbornly weak loan growth.” (…)
Fitch’s caution follows Moody’s last week saying that the banking sector is not yet out of the woods, with reinflation a risk if banks fail to sufficiently predict rate moves.
VALUATION WATCH
From John Authers’ column:
Alliance Bernstein research suggests that the Seven are wildly overvalued compared to history, even with the 10-year yield at its Tuesday low of 4.44%. On this basis, even the other 493 collectively look a little expensive:
Further, it’s possible to question just how great those seven companies are, for all their visibility in contemporary life. The following chart from Richard Bernstein Associates (a completely separate company from Alliance Bernstein) shows that only one makes it into a list of stocks whose earnings per share are growing at more than 25%:
Rich Bernstein argues cogently that there is simply no need for the market to be so tightly concentrated in a few names, as there are plenty of other stocks registering growth:
Narrow markets are economically justified when growth itself is scarce, like during a profits recession, because investors gravitate toward the fewer companies that can produce substantial growth. The extraordinarily narrow leadership of the Magnificent Seven could be justified if growth was extraordinarily scarce. Importantly, growth is not scarce and is actually accelerating.





