The enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it’s the illusion of knowledge (Stephen Hawking)

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so (Mark Twain)

Invest with smart knowledge and objective odds

THE DAILY EDGE: 26 October 2023

Note: I am travelling this month. Posting will be sporadic and shorter due to limited time and equipment.

FLASH PMIs

US private sector growth edges higher while inflationary pressures ease in October

At 51.0 in October, the headline S&P Global Flash US PMI Composite Output Index rose from 50.2 at the end of the third quarter to signal a modest uptick in business activity. Growth in output was the strongest since July, albeit only slight overall.

image

The overall upturn was supported by expansions in activity at manufacturers and service providers at the start of the fourth quarter. Production at manufacturing firms rose at the quickest pace since April, while output growth at service sector firms was the fastest in three months.

Goods producers in particular noted that stronger demand conditions drove the expansion amid a renewed increase in new orders.

Although some service providers highlighted a pick-up in customer numbers, many continued to note that high interest rates and challenging economic conditions weighed on client demand. Some mentioned smaller and less frequent orders being placed by customers. As such, service sector new business fell for a third month running, albeit at a softer pace than seen in September. In contrast, manufacturers registered the fastest rise in new orders in just over a year. Some factories attributed this to the diversification of products and sales strategies.

Nonetheless, foreign client demand remained subdued in October. With the exception of a fractional rise in July, total new export orders have fallen in each month since June 2022. Dollar strength leading to reduced competitiveness, alongside difficult economic conditions in key export markets, led to a dearth of new export orders, according to panellists.

More encouragingly, October data signalled improved expectations among firms regarding the 12-month outlook for output. The degree of confidence picked up to the joint-highest since May 2022, and was led by greater optimism among service providers. Positive sentiment was supported by hopes of stronger demand conditions, an improved ability to hire workers and expand capacity, and an increase in sales initiatives. In contrast, manufacturers reported lower optimism as backlogs of work dwindled, despite a marginal rise in new orders

US businesses continued to hire additional workers during October, albeit at a slightly reduced pace compared to September. The rate of employment growth was only marginal overall as many firms noted that voluntary leavers were not replaced due to uncertainty surrounding future demand conditions and efforts to make cost savings.

The rise in workforce numbers was led by service providers, as manufacturing firms registered a fractional drop in staffing numbers on the month. This signalled the first decline in manufacturing jobs seen since July 2020.

Backlogs of work at firms fell for the sixth month running in October, with the pace of decline easing to the slowest since July. That said, some companies stated that the level of outstanding business moved towards stabilization as incomplete work dwindled and businesses had sufficient capacity to process the new orders inflows

Following a renewed uptick in inflationary pressures in September, rates of increase in input costs and output charges slowed at the start of the fourth quarter. Weaker demand for inputs reportedly led suppliers to reduce material prices, therefore relieving some pressure on cost burdens.

The pace of increase in operating expenses was the slowest in three years, as some firms also noted the removal of some surcharges on components. The softer rise in costs was led by service providers, however, as goods producers recorded the sharpest uptick in input prices since April. Hikes in oil and oil-derived material prices pushed up cost burdens in the manufacturing sector.

image

To drive sales and entice customers, companies raised their average selling prices for goods and services at the slowest pace since June 2020 in October. Manufacturers continued to increase output prices at a modest pace, but service providers saw a notable slowdown in charge inflation amid competitive pressures and customer requests for concessions

The S&P Global Flash US Manufacturing PMI posted 50.0 in October, up fractionally from 49.8 in September, to signal a stabilization in operating conditions at manufacturing firms. The headline index was the highest since April, despite indicating no change in the health of the sector on the month.

A further improvement in supplier performance and still soft demand conditions led firms to cut their input buying for the fifteenth month running in October. The rate of decline was the slowest since April, but firms continued to highlight the rundown of safety stocks, with pre-production inventories falling at a faster pace. Stocks of finished goods also fell further. The rate of contraction softened, however, as some firms noted that cancelled orders were moved to inventories following a reduction in backlogs of work.

Meanwhile, some reports of labor and material shortages at suppliers led to the least marked improvement in lead times since January.

Commenting on the data, Chris Williamson, Chief Business Economist at S&P Global Market Intelligence said:
“Hopes of a soft landing for the US economy will be encouraged by the improved situation seen in October. The S&P Global PMI survey has been among the most downbeat economic indicators in recent months, so the upturn in US output growth signalled at the start of the fourth quarter is good news. Future output expectations have also turned up despite rising geopolitical concerns and domestic political tensions, climbing to the joint-highest for nearly one-and-a-half years.

“Sentiment has improved in part due to hopes of interest rates having peaked, something which looks increasingly likely given the further cooling of inflationary pressures witnessed in October. In spite of higher oil prices, firms’ input cost inflation fell sharply to the lowest since October 2020, and average selling prices for goods and services posted the smallest monthly rise since June 2020.

The survey’s selling price gauge is now close to its pre-pandemic long-run average and consistent with headline inflation dropping close to the Fed’s 2% target in the coming months, something which looks likely to be achieved without output falling into contraction. That said, the tensions in the Middle East pose downside risks to growth and upside risks to inflation, adding fresh uncertainty to the outlook.”

imageEurozone downturn deepens in October, price pressures cool

The eurozone economic downturn accelerated at the start of the fourth quarter, according to provisional PMI survey data for October, with private sector output declining at the steepest rate for over a decade if pandemic affected months are excluded.

image

New orders also fell at an accelerating rate, pointing to a worsening demand environment for both goods and services. Companies cut employment as a result, representing the first drop in headcounts since the lockdowns of early 2021, and remained focused on cost-cutting inventory management.

Despite some upward pressure on costs from higher oil prices, the rate of inflation for goods and services moderated slightly in October, down to its lowest since February 2021. An ongoing sharp fall in manufacturing selling prices was accompanied by a moderation in service sector selling price inflation. (…)

A broad-based downturn was again evident, as a seventh successive month of falling output in the manufacturing sector was accompanied by a third month of contracting service sector activity.
The goods-producing sector continued to report the steeper rate of contraction, the pace of output decline unchanged on the marked pace seen in September to indicate that factories remain in the deepest downturn since 2009 barring the early pandemic lockdowns. (…)

New orders received by manufacturers fell sharply again in October, dropping at a slightly faster rate than September to sustain one of the sector’s steepest downturns in demand since 2009.

Service sector activity meanwhile contracted at an accelerating rate in October, dropping at a rate not seen since early-2021 and since May 2013 if the height of the pandemic is excluded. Recent months have seen the service sector’s performance alter markedly, as a strong resurgence of activity earlier in the year has moved into reverse, in part reflecting a cooling of a post-pandemic surge in spending on travel and recreation.

Measured overall, new business received by service providers fell for a fourth straight month in October, the rate of decline accelerating to the fastest since January 2021.

Measured across goods and services, the resulting drop in new orders was the largest since May 2020 and, if early pandemic months are excluded, since May 2009. The drop in orders was also steeper than the reported decline in output, meaning companies once again relied on backlogs of previously-placed orders to help sustain activity levels. Backlogs of orders were consequently depleted at a rate not seen since June 2020, dropping at slightly faster rates in both manufacturing and services.

Despite reports of higher oil prices having added to firms’ costs over the month, the average cost of inputs into factories fell sharply in October amid discounting as supply exceeded demand. Manufacturing input prices were down for an eighth consecutive month, although the rate of decline eased for a third month in a row.

Service sector input costs were also buoyed by higher fuel prices, though nonetheless rose at a slightly reduced rate compared to September. The overall rate of increase remained elevated, however, often linked to higher wage rates amid the rising cost of living. Although service sector cost inflation has fallen sharply compared to a year ago, the rate of inflation remains higher than at any time in the pre-pandemic period since 2008.

Encouragingly, average prices charged for goods and services rose at a marginally weaker rate in October, the rate of inflation edging down to its lowest since February 2021 and notably continued to run below the average seen in the three years preceding the pandemic. A further marked fall in manufacturing selling prices was accompanied by a cooling of service sector inflation to the lowest since May 2021.

  • The United Kingdom: Industrial orders weakened more than expected in October.

Source: The Daily Shot

Japan: Private sector activity stagnates

After having progressively lost growth momentum in the past months, the Japanese private sector economy saw its first fall in business activity since December 2022, albeit one that was only marginal. This was primarily attributed to a sharper fall in manufacturing output, the quickest in eight months. Services activity meanwhile remained in expansion but grew at the weakest pace in the year-to-date amid reports of worsening economic conditions in October

Firms were also the least upbeat since January, reflecting reduced optimism with regards to future output. Such an outlook was reinforced by other forward-looking indicators from the survey, including the new orders and new export business indices, which both pointed to contractions from September, thereby signalling weaker business activity performance ahead.

One bright spot was the renewed rise in employment, though driven entirely by higher service sector staffing levels amid indications of labour shortages. Firms across both the manufacturing and service sectors also faced reduced cost pressures, which led to overall output prices rising at the slowest rate since February 2022 within the Japanese private sector economy.

image

  • China: Leading indicators point to softer household consumption.

Source: BCA Research

Canada: Sluggish Growth, Slowing Inflation, Softer Currency
  • Incoming data continues to point to increasing challenges and slower growth for the Canadian economy ahead. Past monetary tightening has led to a significant rise in the household debt servicing burden, while forward-looking surveys point to a softening business outlook. Amid this backdrop, we have lowered our Canadian GDP growth forecasts for 1.1% for 2023 and 0.7% for 2024.

  • Although Canada’s September CPI surprised to the downside, inflation remains elevated for now and continues to move only gradually in a more favorable direction.

  • The Bank of Canada (BoC) held its policy rate at 5.00% at its October announcement, and maintained a moderate tightening bias. However, we believe the BoC’s interest rate pause will be an interest rate peak. Given we forecast slower growth and inflation than the central bank, we expect policy rate to hold steady for an extended period, before rate cuts begin in Q2-2024.

  • As Canadian growth remains subdued and in the absence of further BoC tightening, we also see potential for further Canadian dollar weakness over the next several months.

Source: Datastream and Wells Fargo Economics

  
Bank of Canada holds rate steady, trims growth forecast as inflation risks rise

The Bank of Canada held interest rates steady at 5 per cent on Wednesday in a widely anticipated decision. But central bank also said inflationary risks have increased and repeated that it is prepared to further raise rates in the future, “if needed.”

After 10 interest rate increases during the past year and a half, the bank says supply and demand in the Canadian economy are “now approaching balance” – a prerequisite for stabilizing prices. (…)

“We want to see clear evidence that core inflation is moving down. That will give us more confidence that headline inflation will move down towards our target on a sustainable basis … In assessing that, we have two preferred measures of core inflation – CPI-trim, CPI-median – we’re going to be watching those very closely.”

“There’s a few guideposts we use that we know affect underlying inflation. Those are the balance between demand and supply in the economy. Wage growth at 4 to 5 per cent, with virtually no productivity growth, is not consistent with getting inflation back to our target.

Corporate pricing behaviour: When inflation went up a lot, we saw companies were increasing their prices more frequently, and they were increasing them by more. That has started to normalize but it’s still not back to normal.”

“If those things are starting to normalize … we probably won’t have to raise interest rates. But we’ve been very deliberate: we’re leaving the door open to further interest rate increases because there is uncertainty about that, and if we see inflationary pressures persist, we are prepared to raise our interest rate further.”

“What we’re not getting [from high interest rates] is we’re not getting the direct effect of an appreciation [of the CAD] to lower important inflation. So that does mean, everything else equal, we’ve got to rely more on interest rates. So that is something we’ve had to take into account.”

“Our best estimate is the potential output in the economy is growing at about 2 per cent. So supply in the economy is expanding around 2 per cent. Government spending is growing at 2 per cent or less. It’s not adding more demand. It’s not adding faster demand, and supply is growing. So, it’s not adding sort of undue inflationary pressures.”

“If you look at our forecast in the Monetary Policy Report, what you can see is that when we add up the spending plans in the budgets of all levels of government – provincial, federal – for next year, we expect government spending to grow at about two-and-a-half percent. So, what that means is if all those spending plans are realized, government spending will be adding to demand more than supply is growing. And in an environment where we’re trying to moderate spending and get inflation down, that’s not helpful.”

(…) [House prices] they’ve come off a bit this time … but we’re not seeing the decline in house prices that we would expect.”

“There is a structural lack of supply in the Canadian housing market. So really until we address that, that supply issue, interest rates on their own are not going to help us get back to a housing affordability situation or solution. So we’re really pleased to see the degree of focus that governments are putting on this issue right now.”

(…) Near-term inflation expectations are still above the target… Corporate pricing behaviour is not normal… If we saw evidence that higher energy prices were passing through to broader prices because of higher transportation costs, for example, that would be a signal that that increase in oil prices is starting to feed through the rest of the economy and that would really be something of concern to us.”

“It’s not a recession, it’s low positive growth. Having said that, if you’re predicting low positive growth, you can’t rule out that … we’re going get some small negative numbers. So, there could certainly be two or three small negative quarters.”

“When people say the word recession, I think what they have in mind is a steep contraction of output and a large rise in unemployment. That’s not what we’re forecasting. I’ll just close by saying, you know, we’ve been saying for some time that the path to a soft landing is narrow. And in this projection, that path has gotten narrower.”

(…) “To be confident the policy rate is high enough to get inflation back to 2 per cent, we need to see downward momentum in our measures of core inflation.”

“Core inflation on a year-over-year basis has come down, but if you look over the last good eight months or so, on a three month basis, there’s really been very little downward momentum. We need to see clear downward momentum in core inflation. And there are a number of indicators that we’re watching closely.” (…)

Ford Reaches Tentative Labor Deal with UAW The proposed agreement to potentially end the six-week strike contains a 25% pay bump for assembly line workers. If approved, it marks the union’s biggest contract gains in decades.

(…) The labor agreement, which is subject to a member vote before being ratified, contains a 25% wage increase during the span of the contract, including an 11% bump in the first year, according to Chuck Browning, the UAW’s lead bargainer with Ford. The overall increase, which will be spread out over four years, would put the top wage for assembly workers at around $40 an hour.

Workers will also receive cost-of-living adjustments, which were suspended in 2009, and the right to strike over plant closures, Browning said.

Terms of the deal additionally cut the time it takes for new hires to reach the top wage, to three years from eight in the contract that expired last month, the UAW said. (…)

Under the contract that expired last month, Ford’s average hourly labor cost, which includes wages and benefits, was about $64 per worker. Tesla’s all-in labor cost is estimated to be around $45, while the average for the foreign automakers is closer to $55 an hour, according to industry analysts. (…)

With cost-of-living allowances, the top wage rate is expected to increase by 33%. (…)

“We won things nobody thought was possible,” said UAW President Shawn Fain Wednesday night in a video posted on X. “Since the strike began, Ford put 50% more on the table.” (…)

Left out of Wednesday’s announcement were details on key issues including wages and benefits at battery plants and Fain’s initial demand for a 32-hour workweek.

Fain did not address whether the tentative agreement covers Ford’s four battery plants that are under construction or helps the UAW organize the new electric truck assembly plant the automaker is building in Tennessee. (…)

What Bloomberg Intelligence Says:

“Ford’s tentative labor agreement with the UAW may increase its costs by more than $900 million in its first year, based on an 11% raise in year one, putting additional pressure on the company’s efforts to enhance its mediocre profitability.” (…)

If approved, the contract could be of historic proportions. A Bloomberg Law review of the last 10 contracts between the Big Three automakers and the UAW show that raises in that period never topped 3% in a single year. In fact, for 21 of the 36 years covered under these earlier contracts, workers received no annual wage increase at all. (…)

NAKED SWIMMERS

StanChart shares plummet on almost $1 billion hit from China exposure StanChart shares fell as much as 17% in London on Thursday before trading was temporarily halted, after it announced a profit slump driven by a combined nearly $1 billion hit from its exposure to China’s real estate and banking sectors.

(…) The bank said pre-tax profit dropped 33% in the third quarter, far worse than analyst estimates, as it booked a $700 million impairment from its stake in China Bohai Bank (9668.HK), and a $186 million charge from Chinese commercial real estate. (…)

StanChart said the hit on its 16% stake in China Bohai, a lender in the eastern coastal city Tianjin, was due to lower forecast interest rates and decreased lending margins reported in the Chinese bank’s half-year results.

China Bohai booked a 17.8% fall in January-June net interest income, leading to a nearly 7% decline in its overall profit, according to company filings.

StanChart’s Chinese real estate exposure totalled $2.7 billion, down $200 million from the previous quarter.

Note THOSE WERE THE DAYS, MY FRIEND Note

The CFA Level III exam pass rate slipped to 47%, below the decade average but above historic lows set two years ago. More than 16,000 candidates sat for the test in August at 456 testing centers worldwide.

I passed Level III in 1979 when the pass rate reached 76% if I recall well. Surely the exam was easier then…

THE DAILY EDGE: 23 October 2023

Note: I am travelling this month. Posting will be sporadic and shorter due to limited time and equipment.

RENT RANT #4

Slicing & Dicing Inflation

I love Ed Yardeni, even when he has me rant on rent again…

Here he is discussing what many see as the most important data to watch these days:

Most economists, including Debbie and me, believe that if the data don’t support our forecasts, then there must be something wrong with the data and that they will be revised to show we were right after all. Most economists, including yours truly, also often dismiss components of headline indicators that don’t support our story and look to the remaining “core” indicators for conformity to our outlook and therefore confirmation of it. (…)

Another major economic indicator that is invariably sliced and diced by the brotherhood and sisterhood of economists is the CPI. September’s number was released along with all its components last week on Thursday. Some economists (such as us) claimed that it confirmed that inflation is still moderating and is turning out to be relatively transitory. Others looked at the report and concluded that inflation is stalling at a pace well above the Fed’s 2.0% inflation target. A few economists found evidence that inflation may be accelerating again, so it remains a persistent problem.

So who is right? We all are right all the time because there’s plenty of data to support all of our stories. Nonconforming data are dismissed as preliminary estimates that undoubtedly will be revised or simply are flawed. Future revisions no doubt will show that we are on the right track after all; if not, different data do so. We may not all be Keynesians or monetarists, but we are all prescient based on the data we choose to support our outlook!

Now let’s slice and dice the latest CPI and see what’s left: (…)

Before we go any further, here’s our punch line: The headline and core CPI inflation rates excluding shelter were both 2.0% y/y during September (Fig. 3 below). So to the question of when we’re going to get to the Fed’s inflation target, the answer is that we’re there now excluding shelter, at least based on the CPI measure!

Rent of shelter accounts for a whopping 34.7% and 43.6% of the headline and core CPI measures. Its inflation rate jumped from a low of 1.5% during February 2021 to a peak of 8.2% during March 2023 (Fig. 4). It was down in September but only to 7.2%.

In his speech, Powell observed: “Because leases turn over slowly, it takes time for a decline in market rent growth to work its way into the overall inflation measure. The market rent slowdown has only recently begun to show through to that measure. The slowing growth in rents for new leases over roughly the past year can be thought of as ‘in the pipeline’ and will affect measured housing services inflation over the coming year.”

Also, Powell acknowledged in his speech that “market rent” inflation (i.e., for new leases) has declined “steadily” this year. The Zillow rent index was down to 3.2% y/y during September. Using that reading rather than the CPI’s rent of shelter reading of 7.2%, Debbie found that the headline CPI is up just 2.3% versus 3.7% for the actual headline CPI!

Based on our analysis so far, the latest bout of inflation is turning out to be transitory rather than persistent after all, in our opinion. The Fed might achieve its 2.0% target for the core PCED inflation rate well ahead of schedule, i.e., in 2024 rather than 2025.

The chart below plots the Zillow Rent Index with CPI-Rent, both indexed at Jan. 2017=100 (Zillow data starts in 2015).

image

The series diverge starting in 2021 when Zillow rent (“market rent” per Powell and Yardeni) takes off reflecting the pandemic effect on new leases, while the BLS more gradual method takes time to reflect how all leases, including renewals which typically account for 90%+ of all leases, adjust to the “market”.

True, Zillow data show that new leases have flatlined since spring …

image

…but

  • they are still rising MoM and are up 2.2% annualized this year (this is the seasonally adjusted data) and
  • importantly, Zillow’s “market rent” remains 9.2% above CPI-Rent, suggesting that the BLS data needs to rise further, for a while, before it truly reflects the “reality”.

Ed is thus unknowingly right writing:

  • “the data don’t support the forecasts”
  • rentflation “remains a persistent problem”

BTW, in today’s WSJ: There’s Never Been a Worse Time to Buy Instead of Rent It is now 52% more expensive to buy a home than to rent one because of climbing mortgage rates.

And because of climbing house prices, all boosting rental demand:

image

Why would rents deflate in such an environment?

Then on to this other “problem”:

Supercore inflation is persistent.

In his speech, Powell said: To understand the factors that will likely drive further progress [on lowering inflation], it is useful to separately examine the three broad components of core PCE inflation—inflation for goods, for housing services, and for all other services, sometimes referred to as nonhousing services.” That last category has also come to be known as the “supercore” inflation rate. It has been sticky, having been stuck around 4.5%-5.0% since October 2021. However, the CPI services less housing inflation rate was down to 2.8% in September from last year’s peak of 8.2%.

You can slice and dice the CPI as much as you want but, in reality, Powell’s “supercore index” behaves almost exactly like the larger CPI-Services. There was a slight transitory delinking due to the housing crisis and the GFC but services prices are naturally highly sensitive to wage and energy costs.

image

This time, the pandemic helped boost wages which are now dragging services prices upward.

image

Hourly wages are still rising 4.3% YoY but slowed to a 2.4% annualized rate in the last 2 months. Hopefully, that will shortly influence services prices which shot up 5.8% a.r. in the same months. More wishful thinking?

image

But the economy remains strong (the Atlanta Fed GDP Now is at 5.3% for Q3) and so is the labor market:

  • Job postings on Indeed are pretty steady through mid-October
  • Unemployment claims dropped 14% in the 3 weeks to October 14. At 9-month low!
Pointing up Surprised smile US crude oil production has risen substantially in recent weeks.

Who saw that coming? That’s 1M additional bbl/d, just like that!

Source: The Daily Shot

Cracks Emerge in Manufacturing Spending Boom Factories may be built with stone but the commitments to build them tend to be written in pencil, with plenty of wiggle room for delays.

(…) There is indeed a spending surge: Since the beginning of 2021, companies have announced $650 billion worth of megaprojects — defined as an investment greater than $1 billion — according to tabulations by Melius Research. These were not just grand ideas and suggestions; factories, hospitals and airports are getting built. Melius calculates that more than 50% of the megaprojects it’s tracking have already broken ground. Construction spending on manufacturing has doubled to an annualized rate of nearly $200 billion as of August, up from about $82 billion in the same period in 2019, according to Census Bureau data.

The problem is that markets that were recently booming are now looking less robust. Rising interest rates, inflation and a shortage of skilled workers have also made many projects materially more expensive than even just a few months ago. Factories may be built with stone but the commitments to build them tend to be written in pencil, with plenty of wiggle room for delays or for companies to change their minds entirely. As I’ve written before, the reality of reshoring is much more nebulous and nuanced than the narrative, and the timeline is subject to a high degree of variability.

Just this week, Tesla Inc. Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk said the company isn’t ready to go “full tilt” on construction of a vehicle factory in Monterrey, Mexico, and needs to first get a better sense of where the economy is headed and the impact of higher interest rates on car purchases.

That the factory was announced only in March shows just how quickly the economic winds can change — even for products that are considered high-growth government priorities. (…)

A significant percentage of the prominent and high-dollar US factory announcements post-pandemic is tied to electric vehicles. The capital spending plans for this industry factor heavily into bullish investor sentiment on electrical infrastructure and automation equipment manufacturers. So it’s concerning to see even incremental signs of a pullback. The knock-on effects could be painful for industrial companies with rich valuations, such as Eaton Corp. and nVent Electric Plc.

In inflation-adjusted terms, overall investment in structures in the US is trending 20% below pre-pandemic levels and manufacturing is the only category seeing higher levels of spending, according to a June report from Deloitte citing data from the US Bureau of Economic Analysis. Real investment in power plants, mining exploration and commercial office buildings has yet to recover. Weaker structure spending elsewhere in the economy counteracts much of the manufacturing boom, as Bloomberg Opinion’s Karl W. Smith writes.

To that end, elevator and escalator maker Schindler Holding AG this week lowered its outlook for new installations in the Americas in 2023 to a decline of more than 10% amid a “recent softening across all major construction sector indicators.” Overall orders grew 3.8% on a local currency basis in the most recent quarter, roughly half the pace of the previous period. Shares of crane and aerial lift-maker Terex Corp. fell by the most since 2020 after the company’s updated earnings guidance fell short of analysts’ estimates, fueling fears of a peak in demand.

Meanwhile, ABB Ltd. said orders declined 27% in its robotics and discrete automation business in the third quarter amid weak demand in China and a pullback in bookings from machine builders as they work through inventory accumulated during the post-pandemic supply chain disruptions. Discrete manufacturing deals with distinct, countable items such appliances or cars on a factory assembly line. These pressures are expected to persist for “the next couple of quarters,” Chief Financial Officer Timo Ihamuotila said on the company’s earnings call this week.

It’s not that demand is falling off a cliff, but slumping orders and shrinking backlogs don’t fit with the super-cycle narrative, and companies grappling with such a dynamic don’t tend to command particularly rich valuations. “While there is undoubtedly some resilience from project related activity (as these tend to involve a backlog, rather than just ‘book and ship’ activity), we caution that this clearly does not guarantee a strong share price performance, particularly in the context of a high degree of ‘crowding’ of the investment community consensus,” Barclays Plc analyst Julian Mitchell wrote in a note this month.

Reshoring, nearshoring, friendshoring have become investment themes and there is no doubt that this cycle is different, although new orders have flatlined recently:

image

Interestingly, the surge in manufacturing construction spending did not boost productive capacity anywhere close to previous peaks, at least just yet:

image

And capacity utilization rates have not improved.

image

TECHNICALS WATCH

From Longview Economics

(…) a wide variety of equity indices are now sitting at/close to key levels: The S&P500 is at the lower end of its uptrend channel (which has been in place since October last year). It’s also sitting on its 200-day moving average (4,255 – see chart); the NDX100 is below its 50-day moving average, and on multi month technical support; a broad European index is on its lows from earlier this month (and those from the March banking crisis).

Added to which, from a technical perspective, it looks like it’s entered into a downtrend (as does the DAX). Elsewhere in the US, the small and mid-cap indices (Russell 2000 and S&P600) are similarly sitting on major technical lows; while the Philly SOX is on its 200-day moving average.

image006-1

Geopolitics are complicating an already complicated environment. Danger zone ahead! The S&P 500 equal weight index flashed negative on Oct. 2.

image