ADP National Employment Report: 103K Private Jobs Added in November
The ADP employment report showed that 103K nonfarm private jobs were added in November, a slight slow down from the 106K private jobs added in October. The latest figure is lower than the expected 130K new private jobs and is the second smallest monthly increase since January 2021.
The forecast for the forthcoming BLS report is that 155,000 private nonfarm jobs were added in November. However, the forecast for the full nonfarm jobs (the PAYEMS number) is for 180,000 jobs to have been added. Here is a visualization of the two series over the past twelve months. (…)
ADP also reported that job-stayers saw a 5.6% YoY pay increase in November, the slowest increase since September 2021. Job-changers also saw slowing pay growth at +8.3%, the smallest YoY increase since June 2021.
Goldman Sachs:
We do not place much weight on the ADP miss because of ADP’s negative correlation with BLS private payrolls since the introduction of the new methodology. We left our nonfarm payroll forecast unchanged at +238k ahead of Friday’s release.
Nonfarm productivity was revised up by more than expected in Q3 (+0.5pp to +5.2%, qoq ar) and the year-over-year rate now stands at +2.4%. Since 2019 Q4, labor productivity has grown at an annualized rate of 1.5%.
Unit labor costs—compensation divided by output—were revised down by more than expected (-1.2%, qoq ar), and the year-on-year rate now stands at +1.6%.
Compensation per hour increased at a 3.9% annualized rate and a 4.0% year-over-year rate in Q3. Our wage tracker remains at 4.4% annualized in Q3 (vs. 5.2% in Q2) and 4.4% year-over-year (vs. 5.0% in Q2).
Charts from Ed Yardeni:

Bank of Canada retains its hawkish bias
The Bank of Canada kept rates unchanged at 5.0% today, as widely expected. The policy statement noted that “higher interest rates are clearly restraining spending: consumption growth in the last two quarters was close to zero, and business investment has been volatile but essentially flat over the past year”. Incidentally, the BoC recognised the faster pace on the disinflation front, dropping the reference to “slow” progress on inflation.
Those considerations would have likely led to a more dovish tone on the policy outlook as a consequence, but the BoC decided to reiterate the threat of more monetary policy tightening instead: “Governing Council is still concerned about risks to the outlook for inflation and remains prepared to raise the policy rate further if needed”.
The concerns about the inflation outlook come not only from potential external shocks (e.g. energy prices), but also from a resiliently tight domestic labour market, as confirmed by last week’s strong jobs figures.
We are still convinced that the BoC will not tighten policy further given the deterioration of the economic outlook and our expectations for a steady decline in Canadian’s inflation.
However, there is a likely intent to fight the ongoing dovish repricing of rate expectations in Canada, and that means the BoC out-of-meeting commentary may be careful to send dovish messages to the market before the January meeting, when new economic projections will be released.
China’s Weak Trade Data Signals More Economic Pain to Come Imports in dollar terms declined 0.6% in November from 2022
Imports in dollar terms declined 0.6% after clocking an improvement the previous month, according to official data released Thursday. That was worse than economists’ consensus forecast of a 3.9% gain.
Overseas shipments rose 0.5% from a year ago, slightly better than the consensus estimate of no change, and marked the first year-on-year expansion since April. The resulting trade surplus was $68.39 billion. (…)
An expected seasonal surge in trade also failed to deliver because of weak global demand. Exports are usually stronger in the final months of a year, due to a boost in demand ahead of the Christmas and holiday season overseas. Disruptions from the pandemic in November last year resulted in a steep contraction in trade, which makes the headline numbers this year look better by comparison. (…)
Capital Economics analyst Zichun Huang said in a Thursday note that November’s uptick in exports was likely driven by price cuts. “This is not sustainable and is negatively affecting firms’ profit margins, which have dropped near to levels not seen since at least 2010,” she added.
Exports to the US and European Union have fallen by over 10% so far this year from the same period last year, while those to Russia surged 50%, according to the official data. Imports of steel plunged 27% so far in 2023 as the property downturn deepened, while chips declined by 16.5%. (…)
- Xi Tells EU Leaders China Wants to Be ‘Key Partner’ on Trade Chinese leader urges ‘mutually beneficial cooperation’ with EU
(…) “China is promoting high-quality development and high-level opening up, and is willing to regard the EU as a key partner in economic and trade cooperation,” Xi said in a meeting Thursday in Beijing with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and European Council President Charles Michel. He said China wants to consider Europe a “trusted partner in industrial and supply chain cooperation to pursue mutual benefit and win-win results,” state broadcaster China Central Television reported.
The talks marked the first in-person summit between China and the EU officials in four years, and was expected to cover long-standing issues ranging from data flows to market access. (…)
During the meeting, Xi called on Beijing and the bloc to “eliminate all kinds of interference,” according CCTV. That remark is likely aimed at the US, which has taken actions including enlisting the Netherlands in its effort to stop China from from developing the ability to make high-end semiconductors. (…)
Ahead of Thursday’s meeting in Beijing, Italy formally told China it would exit the nation’s Belt and Road Initiative. While Italy had for months been preparing to end its involvement in Xi’s signature investment program, the timing of the announcement underscored continued strains between the world’s second-largest economy and members of the bloc. (…)
Wall Street Puts a ‘Sell’ on Its China Holdings Institutional investments in the nation have plunged as its economy slows and property market craters; “a bit of an awakening.”
(…) China’s economic slowdown is deepening. An unprecedented property slump is scaring investors who hold hundreds of billions of dollars of debt issued by Chinese developers. And Chinese leader Xi Jinping’s emphasis on national security has restricted access to data and sparked raids and investigations involving foreign firms assessing investment risks in the country.
The amount of money that institutional investors have in Chinese stocks and bonds has declined by more than $31 billion this year, through October, the biggest net outflow since China joined the World Trade Organization in 2001, official Chinese data show.
Hedge funds, including Bridgewater Associates, whose founder Ray Dalio has long been a China bull, have significantly reduced their holdings of Chinese securities.
Private-equity firms, including Carlyle, have slashed fundraising targets for their Asia funds or stopped raising China-oriented funds altogether. Mutual-fund managers such as Vanguard and Van Eck Associates have either pulled out or aborted their China plans.
Over the past decade, private-equity funds targeting China have raised an average of nearly $100 billion each year. So far this year, they have raised a meager $4.35 billion, according to data firm Preqin. (…)
The reduction of that Wall Street money is another blow to a Chinese economy already facing an exodus of foreign manufacturers and other companies. In the third quarter, for the first time since the late 1990s, more foreign investment in assets such as factories and stores left China than flowed in. (…)
Bridgewater has substantially reduced its holdings of Chinese securities. In the third quarter, the fund’s regulatory filings show, it liquidated or reduced its positions in some three dozen Chinese companies, including electric-car maker Xpeng and e-commerce giant PDD Holdings. As of the end of September, the value of its equity ownerships in Chinese companies was 60% lower than a year earlier.
“China is in the midst of secular deleveraging that will likely take many years to work through,” it said in a Sept. 30 research report. “Growth remains weaker than desired.” (…)
(…) The MSCI China Index has lost 15% this year, compared with a 2% increase in the gauge for emerging-market shares and a 15% gain in the MSCI India Index (…).
The MSCI China Index is trading at 8.9 times of earnings over the next 12 months, compared with 11.4 of MSCI Emerging Markets Index. Apart from a brief period at the onset of the pandemic, the 22% discount marks the biggest since Bloomberg started to compare the data in 2006.
The stocks are trading cheaply for a reason. Chinese companies’ return on equity has been persistently declined since 2011, reflecting deteriorating investment opportunities.
They have missed earnings estimates for nine consecutive quarters, and bottoming isn’t likely in the first quarter, according to Morgan Stanley’s strategists including Laura Wang. The strategists expect the MSCI China to return 7% next year, with an upside potential of 25%, and a downside risk of 34%. (…)
This RBA chart sums up various equity market valuations vs their own 20-year history:

While the US market appears expensive on the index level, aggregate market statistics hide what could be a historic range of valuations. The ‘Magnificent 7’ dominate standard indices and look very expensive, and their weights in the major indices skew index valuation upward. Yet the vast majority of US stocks are relatively cheap. This stark valuation bifurcation has gotten more pronounced throughout 2023.
Ed Yardeni’s take excluding IT stocks. His calculations also reveal that growth in forward EPS for S&P 500 IT companies is 14.9% vs 5.7% ex-IT.
“Nobody seems to be aware that market breadth is so bad that 44% of the individual stocks in the S&P 500 are down year-to-date!” David Rosenberg








