The enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it’s the illusion of knowledge (Stephen Hawking)

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so (Mark Twain)

Invest with smart knowledge and objective odds

NEW$ & VIEW$ (13 APRIL 2016)

Retail Sales Unexpectedly Fall as U.S. Spending Loses Momentum

Pretty dismal stat.

The 0.3 percent drop in purchases followed little change the prior month, Commerce Department figures showed Wednesday in Washington. The median forecast of 81 economists surveyed by Bloomberg called for a 0.1 percent gain.

The decrease was led by the biggest drop in demand for autos in a year, and cutbacks at clothing stores, Internet merchants and restaurants. (…) Retail sales excluding automobiles and service stations increased 0.1 percent, less than the projected gain of 0.3 percent in the Bloomberg survey.

The figures used to calculate gross domestic product, which exclude categories such as food services, auto dealers, home-improvement stores and service stations, showed a 0.1 percent advance, matching the prior month’s increase in the so-called retail control group.

The retail report showed sales decreased 0.9 percent at clothing chains, the biggest retreat since October, and a 0.8 percent drop at restaurants and bars. (…) (Chart from Doug Short)

Control Sales YoY

Sad smile Zerohedge adds:

(…) and if you are hopeful about April, Johnson-Redbook reported a 2.8% plunge in Same-Store-Sales – the worst start to an April since 2005.

Finally, as Goldman notes, weakness in auto sales and production could be an unwelcome headache for the manufacturing sector. Growth in auto output has accounted for 40% of the increase in manufacturing production since January 2012, not including spillovers to related sectors (Exhibit 4).

The total effect is likely bigger, as spillovers from auto manufacturing can be significant:

  • producing $1 of motor vehicle output requires $1.8 dollars of output from all other industries – the highest “multiplier” of any sector in the economy (according to the BEA’s input-output accounts).

Although prospects for the manufacturing sector have started to look brighter, a pullback in motor vehicle activity could limit the extent of any rebound.

China exports surge as economy perks up Latest data add to series of signals that outlook is improving

(…) Exports surged 18.7 per cent in renminbi terms in March over the same month last year, after declines in both January and February. Imports also stabilised, dropping just 1.7 per cent compared with an 8 per cent fall in February.

In dollar terms, exports rose 11.5 per cent while imports fell 7.6 per cent for the period, reflecting the renminbi’s recent rise. The currency has gained 1.9 per cent against the dollar over the past two months. (…)

Bloomberg adds:

Seasonal factors aided the recovery. The week-long lunar new year holiday fell in February this year, closing factories and curbing shipments. That saw exports tumble 25.4 percent in U.S. dollar terms from a year earlier, the biggest decline since May 2009.

Exports to the U.S. increased 9 percent while those to EU nations jumped 17.9 percent. Shipments to Brazil plunged 39.4 percent. Imports from the U.S. fell 2.8 percent, while those from Canada tumbled 32.3 percent. China’s imports from the EU rose 1.4 percent.

Eurozone Industrial Output Fell in February

The European Union’s statistics agency said on Wednesday that the output of factories, mines and utilities fell 0.8% from January, but was 0.8% higher than in February 2015. That was a weaker outcome than anticipated, with economists surveyed by The Wall Street Journal last week having estimated output fell 0.5% on the month, and rose 1.3% on the year. (…)

The decline in industrial output during February was widespread across the eurozone, with German production falling 0.7%, French production 1%, and Italian production 0.6%. (…)

image

image
IMF Cuts Global Economic Growth Outlook for 2016 The world economy is increasingly at risk of stalling, the International Monetary Fund warned as it once again cut its forecast for global growth prospects.

(…) The IMF said it was forced to downgrade its growth forecast for this year to 3.2%, down by 0.2 percentage point from its projection issued in January. China’s slowdown and weak commodity prices are taking a deeper toll on emerging markets than expected and rich countries are still struggling to escape the legacies of the financial crisis, the fund said.

The downward revision is the fourth straight cut in a year, putting world economic growth just a hair over last year’s 3.1% and only marginally above the 3% rate the IMF has previously considered a technical recession globally.

“Consecutive downgrades of future economic prospects carry the risk of a world economy that reaches stalling speed and falls into widespread secular stagnation,” IMF Chief Economist Maurice Obstfeld said as the fund launched its flagship report. The IMF is worried such stagnation could further stifle investment, smother wage growth, curb employment and push government debt to unsustainable levels in some countries. (…)

Recessions in Russia and Brazil are proving to be deeper and longer than the IMF anticipated after political problems compounded the effects of a plunge in commodity prices. Dozens of other oil exporters—from Venezuela to Canada, Saudi Arabia to Nigeria—are also facing sharp slowdowns.

The IMF upgraded China’s growth forecast this year by 0.2 percentage point to 6.5% as the service sector compensated for a downturn in manufacturing. (…)

Europe and Japan, meanwhile, can’t seem to escape from low growth despite aggressive central-bank actions that have pushed rates into uncharted negative territory. (…)

The IMF shaved 0.2 percentage point off its U.S. growth forecast for the year to 2.4%. (…)

Amid those threats, the IMF also cut its global forecast for next year by 0.1 percentage point to 3.5%. (…)

France Ramps Up Austerity to Hit Budget Targets

(…) The French finance ministry said it would find an additional €3.8 billion ($4.31 billion) of savings this year and another €5 billion in 2017 to ensure France meets its pledge of getting the budget deficit under the European limit of 3% of economic output.

The belt-tightening indicates Mr. Hollande is opting for fiscal credibility rather than handing out sweeteners to taxpayers before the 2017 presidential election. (…)

Weak Oil Prices Curbing Crude Production The debate among the world’s biggest oil nations over whether to freeze production is beginning to be overtaken by a rapid slide in global output.

(…) London-based research consultancy Energy Aspects recently revised its estimates for non-OPEC production declines this year to 700,000 barrels a day from 200,000 to 300,000 in earlier forecasts. It expects demand to begin outstripping supply and drawing on swollen crude stockpiles globally starting in June. (…)

The U.S. Energy Information Administration said in its short-term energy outlook Tuesday that U.S. crude production fell by 90,000 barrels a day in March from February. The agency lowered its U.S. output forecast for 2016 to 8.6 million barrels a day and 8 million barrels a day in 2017. That is off from a multidecade peak of 9.4 million barrels a day last year. (…)

It isn’t just U.S. shale fields falling off. In the deep waters of the North Sea, where production is expensive, declining investment has meant the output declines that fields naturally experience over time have overtaken production from new drilling.

Norway’s crude-oil production, for example, grew by 4% to 1.56 million barrels a day in 2015. But output is expected to drop by 2% in 2016 and gradually level off to 1.38 million barrels a day in 2019, according to the Norwegian Petroleum Directorate.

Oil production in Latin America is plummeting, as well, according to Energy Aspects. In Brazil nearly all of the biggest fields could see declines this year. Overall, Latin American production in February and March dropped below 8 million barrels a day for the first time since March 2014. Production in Mexico and Venezuela is also falling. (…)

“The key is going to be, once we have a pickup in prices how does shale respond? The jury is out on that.” said Christof Ruhl, global head of research for the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority.

(…) The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries forecast on Wednesday that a long-expected contraction in non-OPEC oil supply was shaping up to be steeper than expected. In March, it forecast non-OPEC output would fall by 700,000 barrels a day this year. It is now estimating that drop will be 730,000 barrels a day.

The downgrade was due to lower expectations for oil production from China’s onshore mature fields and further declines in the U.S. and the U.K., where projects have been deferred due to lower oil prices. (…)

In its closely watched monthly report, the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries cut its forecast for 2016 oil demand growth by 50,000 barrels a day. Demand for the commodity will now rise by 1.20 million barrels a day to 94.18 million barrels a day, according to its projections.

The downgrade, though small, is underpinned by slower economic momentum in Latin America and uncertainties in Chinese growth, OPEC said. (…)

OPEC said its overall crude production rose by 15,000 barrels a day to 32.25 million barrels a day in March. The increase was driven by Iran, whose output rose by 139,400 barrels a day to 3.291 million barrels a day last month. (…)

S&P 500 Energy Sector Closes Above 200-Day Moving Average After 566 Days Below

energysectorchart(Bespoke Investment)

Tax-Rule Changes Ripple Widely The Treasury’s new corporate rules will reach far beyond the few companies that moved their legal addresses to low-tax countries, forcing many firms based in the U.S. to change their internal financing strategies and tax planning.

(…) Corporate tax lawyers, who have spent the past week trying to understand one of the Obama administration’s most far-reaching tax regulations, say the rules cast aside decades of precedents and force corporations to alter routine cash-management techniques. The rules would also end a strategy used by companies such as Illinois Tool Works Inc. to repatriate foreign profits without paying U.S. taxes.

Tax lawyers were surprised at how many transactions may be affected by the rules, which address the line between internal company debt and equity.

“The breadth and scope of the regs are quite a bit beyond what anyone expected,” said Jason Bazar, a partner at Mayer Brown LLP in New York, who advises companies on cross-border transactions. “They’ve assumed the worst in certain transactions and not considered the commercial considerations.” (…)

The second package would have longer-lasting effects. It limits earnings stripping, the post-inversion technique used to load up U.S. subsidiaries with debt and push profits to low-tax countries. But it is much bigger than that.

The rules are of particular interest to foreign companies with significant U.S. operations, such as Nestlé SA, which expressed concerns about the regulations last week. Nestlé, which said it doesn’t engage in earnings stripping, said Tuesday it will monitor the regulations. It said it worries the rules could affect foreign-based groups’ investments and jobs in the U.S. (…)

The rules were written under the 47-year-old Section 385 of the tax code, which gives Treasury wide authority to distinguish debt and equity. That is often a tricky distinction to make, and companies exploit it to extract all the benefits of debt, including interest deductions in the U.S. and tax-free repatriation of foreign profits.

“We’re not really focused on cash management here,” a senior Treasury official said Tuesday. “We’re really focused on extraordinary amounts of debt being loaded onto companies in a short period of time.” (…)

NEW$ & VIEW$ (28 MARCH 2016): Waldo Disappears!

U.S. Consumer Spending Rose 0.1% in February

Personal spending, which measures outlays on everything from washing machines to haircuts, increased a seasonally adjusted 0.1% in February from the prior month, the Commerce Department said Monday. January’s spending growth was revised down to 0.1% from an earlier estimate of 0.5%. Surprised smile

Personal income, including earnings from wages and other sources, rose 0.2% last month after January’s unrevised 0.5% growth. It was the smallest monthly rise for income since September.

Economists surveyed by The Wall Street Journal had expected spending to rise 0.1% in February and income to climb 0.1% as well.

Households saved more in early 2016. The personal saving rate in February was 5.4%, up from 5.3% in January and 5.0% in December.

The personal consumption expenditures price index, which is the Federal Reserve’s preferred inflation measure, fell 0.1% from January and climbed 1.0% compared with February 2015. Energy prices tumbled 6.4% from January while food prices rose 0.2%.

Excluding the volatile categories of food and energy, core prices rose 0.1% in February from the prior month and climbed 1.7% from a year earlier, unchanged from January’s annual growth. (…)

In the final three months of 2015, consumer spending expanded at a solid 2.4% annual rate and contributed 1.66 percentage points to the 1.4% annual growth rate for gross domestic product, the Commerce Department said Friday.(…)

Accounting for price changes, consumer spending on both goods and services rose 0.2% in February from the prior month and was flat in January, the Commerce Department estimated in Monday’s report.

Durable-Goods Orders Weaken Amid Global Headwinds A key measure of U.S. manufacturing health tipped back into decline last month, evidence that headwinds from weak global growth, low oil prices and financial volatility are weighing on company spending.

New orders for durable goods—products designed to last at least three years, like dishwashers and aircraft—fell a seasonally adjusted 2.8% in February from a month earlier, the Commerce Department said Thursday. (…)

Spending on defense aircraft and parts led the decline, falling 29.2% on the month. Civilian aircraft orders fell 27.1%. (…)

New orders for nondefense capital goods excluding aircraft, considered a proxy for business spending on equipment, fell 1.8% in February following a 3.1% rise in January. (…)

Some economists lowered their estimates for first-quarter gross domestic product on the basis of Thursday’s report. Forecasting firm Macroeconomic Advisers lowered its projection to 1.5% from an earlier estimate of 1.9% growth.

Haver Analytics’ table reveal the continuing weakness in capital goods:

image

Evercore ISI tracks real capex shipments including aircrafts:

image

Doug Short’s chart illustrates the flat core capex over the last 4 years:

image

In all, U.S. manufacturing remains quite weak as Markit confirmed last week:

March data indicated subdued growth momentum across the U.S. manufacturing sector, thereby continuing the trend seen throughout 2016 to date. (…) Moreover, looking at the average PMI reading for Q1 as a whole (51.7), the headline index pointed to the weakest improvement over any quarter since Q3 2012. (…)

image

Although manufacturing production growth picked up from the 28-month low recorded in February, the latest rise was only marginal and one of the weakest seen over the past two-and-a-half years. Anecdotal evidence from survey respondents suggested that relatively subdued demand conditions and, in some cases, efforts to streamline post-production stocks, had acted as a headwind to output growth in March.

New business volumes continued to increase across the manufacturing sector, but the latest expansion was only slightly faster than in February and still weaker than the post-crisis trend. Survey respondents noted that lower capital spending across the energy sector and subdued export demand had weighed on overall new order growth. (…)

Manufacturers signalled a further reduction in their inventory volumes in March. The latest fall in stocks of finished goods was the fastest since November 2015, while pre-production inventories declined at the steepest pace for over two years.

Obviously, manufacturers are not optimistic on a spring revival.

Thankfully, autos remain strong:

Auto Forecast: March Sales Set to Hit Record-High

A WardsAuto forecast calls for U.S. automakers to deliver 1.7 million light vehicles this month, a record high for March and the largest volume for any month since July 2005’s 1,804,240 units.

The forecasted daily sales rate of 61,727 over 27 days is a best-ever March result. This DSR represents a 0.2% improvement from like-2015 (25 days), while total volume for the month would be 8.2% greater than year-ago. If deliveries meet or exceed WardsAuto’s expectations, March will be the eight consecutive month to outpace prior-year on a DSR basis.

The report puts the seasonally adjusted annual rate of sales for the month at 17.3 million units, below the 17.4 million SAAR from the first two months of 2016 combined, but well above the 17.1 million SAAR from same-month year-ago. (…)

Automakers are preparing for a strong Q2, as the WardsAuto production schedule shows a 4.8% increase in builds compared with Q1.

WardsAuto currently is forecasting 17.8 million LV deliveries in full-year 2016.

For how long?

(…) Cars have literally been driving the U.S. economy in the aftermath of the collapse in the energy industry which took high-paying jobs down with it. To be specific, car sales to marginal buyers who cannot afford the payment for very long have pushed car sales to record levels.

If you’re hoping this economic prop is sustainable, and you should be given the alternative, you’re apt to be disappointed. A recent Bloomberg story shed light on how sales have been turbocharged. As was the case with subprime mortgage lending which pushed homeownership to record levels, new car-financing entrants have been responsible for record car sales.

According to J.P. Morgan Chase calculations, among subprime lenders that tap the securitization market to in turn finance their operations, new entrants now account for 28 percent of the business, multiples of the single-digit market share they had between 2011 and 2013. That makes these corporate whippersnappers the biggest players in the market. Their secret weapon? That would be ridiculously lax underwriting standards to qualify unqualified buyers.

As was the case with subprime mortgages, it’s a great growth industry. That is, until it’s not. Investors keeping the lights on at these companies have apparently started to balk at the number of loans backing the securities they’re supposed to be lining up to buy going sour. According to Fitch Ratings, subprime delinquencies of 60 days or more hit 5.16 percent in February, a stone’s throw from the previous record of 5.96 percent in October 1996. (Danielle DiMartino)

Are we at peak employment? (via Valuewalk):

Initial Claims

Claims per Employee
Claims per Labor Force

If you think this is unrelated with weak durable goods, here’s a chart for you:

Claims per Employee and Durable Orders

Ed Yardeni plots this other relationship:

image

Hmmm…we sure need the consumer to consume! But there is a worrying bend in this Markit chart on core sales.

A recent retailers survey declined broadly last week and the latest Atlanta Fed GDPNow is down to +1.4%, half of its level 6 weeks ago!

Evolution of Atlanta Fed GDPNow real GDP forecast

So. Fed up, or not?

  • The biz side of the economy is weak and weakening.
  • So seems to be the consumer side.
  • In spite of strong employment and rising wages.

In spite of a strong employment environment, consumers are not spending much. And now, it looks like employment can’t get much better…without triggering higher wages.

BTW:

A day after announcing it will offer profit-sharing to its more than 100,000 employees, American Airlines said Thursday it would increase pay for its 25,000 flight attendants by about 6%.

Under its contract with flight attendants signed in December 2014, American was required to adjust pay scales once United Airlines reached a new joint contract with its flight attendants. Rather than wait any longer for United to reach a deal, American is going ahead with a pay hike, effective April 1. (…)

According to the L.A. Times, the minimum wage will jump from $10 to $10.50 an hour in 2017 and will increase by $1 every year after that until reaching $15 an hour in 2022.

And while things are getting murkier and murkier…

The Decline of Dissent at the Fed Dallas Fed President Robert Steven Kaplan is part of a widening consensus taking root inside the nation’s central bank for a strategy of raising rates slowly in the months and years ahead.

During much of the post-financial-crisis era, many regional Fed bank presidents challenged views coming out of the Federal Reserve Board in Washington about monetary policy. Now Fed Chairwoman Janet Yellen has more of the institution marching behind her in agreement with her strategy of raising rates slowly in the months and years ahead.

A more cohesive Fed can make it easier for markets to read where policy is headed, but can raise the risk of officials thinking so much alike that they miss new threats to the economy, some analysts say. (…)

“We want to try to normalize [interest rates] as fast as we can,” Mr. Kaplan said in a Dallas office stuffed with memorabilia from his home state of Kansas and with management “how to” books he wrote at Harvard. “But we have to be patient and gradual.” (…)

Looking ahead to 2018, for example, officials see rates rising to somewhere in a narrow range between 2.125% and 3.875%. When Ms. Yellen took the job in 2014, the officials’ projections three years out varied much more widely, between 0.75% to 4.25%.

In addition to Mr. Fisher, the other policy outliers who have left the Fed in the past year are Charles Plosser, the former Philadelphia Fed president who also opposed easy money, and Narayana Kocherlakota, the former Minneapolis Fed president who advocated more aggressive easy-money policies. Mr. Plosser’s successor, Patrick Harker, has expressed centrist policy views. Mr. Kocherlakota’s successor, Neel Kashkari, has publicly challenged Ms. Yellen on bank supervision but not monetary policy. (…)

In two years on the job, she has faced nine dissents, including just two in the past 10 meetings. Mr. Bernanke faced 48 dissents in eight tumultuous years. (…)

Four of the 12 regional Fed bank presidents were affiliated with Goldman before joining the Fed, feeding public perceptions that the central bank is too close to big banks bailed out during the financial crisis. (…)

(…) St. Louis Fed President James Bullard, a voting member of the policy-setting Federal Open Market Committee this year, said in a Bloomberg News interview Wednesday that the rate projections contribute to uncertainty. (…)

Gavyn Davies: Is the global economy snapping back into gear?

(…) It would be wrong to place too much importance on a single month’s data, especially when the nowcasts are heavily influenced by business and consumer surveys.

These surveys have remained mixed, but downward momentum has been partly reversed in most advanced economies, especially in the US where the regional Fed surveys for March have been identified by the nowcast models as major upside surprises. In fact, sentiment had become so pessimistic that even slightly better data have represented positive surprises relative to economists’ expectations, according to the Citigroup Surprise Indices.

These better numbers still leave the global economy growing at 0.7 per cent below trend, so spare capacity in the world system is still rising, and long term underlying inflation pressures should therefore still be dropping.

Better, but still not very good, is this month’s verdict. Full details of this month’s nowcasts can be found here. (…)

The slight improvement in recent data needs to be kept in context. The grim story of downward forecast revisions for growth in the global economy continues. For the fifth successive year, consensus GDP forecasts for 2016 have already been revised downwards by a full percentage point, and they continue to plummet. Even with this month’s better data, the global growth rate is still running about 0.7 percentage points below the consensus forecast for the calendar year, so further downgrades to forecasts look highly probable. (…)

It now seems likely that the US manufacturing sector has rebounded as inventories have stabilised, the effects of the strong dollar have abated, and cutbacks in energy investment have ended. For the first time since the first half of 2015, US activity growth now seems to be slightly above trend. (…)

China continues its pattern of mini cycles which last less than a year from peak-to-peak, super-imposed on a gradually declining trend rate of growth. It is not clear what causes this pattern, though it may be due in part to repeated bursts of policy support which periodically push the growth rate above trend, before fading away.

The latest mini cycle embarked on a downward phase in January 2016, and it has taken the activity growth rate down to only about 5.o per cent, the lowest rates recorded since the Great Recession. In contrast to previous episodes, the markets have not shown much concern about this dip in growth, apparently believing it to be temporary. It is clear that fiscal and monetary policy are now in expansionary territory, and this should lead to a recovery soon, albeit one that is based, as usual, on fixed investment.

As last week’s blog mentioned, the market’s insouciance may be connected to an improvement in the credibility of Chinese macro-economic and exchange rate strategy, compared to the implosion of confidence that followed confusing policy communications in 2015.

China Banks’ Profitability Pressures to Continue in 2016 Major Chinese banks’ results for 2015, which are due to be released next week, should show continued subdued earnings growth amid margin compression and asset deterioration. These trends are expected to continue in 2016, underscoring the negative sector outlook.

(…) The quarterly run-rate in reported NPLs decelerated in 4Q15, while we believe this is due partly to more substantial NPL write-offs/disposals towards the end of the year as banks struggled to meet their provisioning requirements.

The provision coverage ratio at state banks and joint-stock banks had fallen to 172% and 181%, respectively, on average by end-2015. The need to maintain this ratio above 150% will restrain earnings growth in 2016 – unless this ratio is relaxed. The floor could also encourage further under-reporting of NPLs.

Reports from local media today suggest that the authorities are considering lowering the provisioning requirement to 130%-140% for selected banks. Fitch believes a relaxation would run counter to a need for conservative provisioning at a time when asset quality is deteriorating and the concerns around the true level of NPLs in the system. That said, such changes in regulations in isolation should not have major rating implications as our analysis takes into account factors and performance trends beyond reported profitability figures.

The reduction in the interest burden for borrowers following successive rate cuts and other monetary loosening through 2015 should keep reported NPLs below 2% for most banks. The system-wide NPL ratio and “special-mention” loan ratio were 1.67% and 3.79%, respectively, at end-2015, up from 1.25% and 3.11% a year ago. The trend in overdue loans may paint a more interesting picture, though, as Chinese banks tend to report very similar NPL ratios despite varying levels of overdue loans.

Furthermore, changes in investment income or revaluation reserves may also signal deterioration in the quality of non-loan credit, especially in mid-tier banks. This may take the form of investment receivables representing a growing share in the asset mix.

Loss-absorption trends could be a key rating driver for most banks while profitability and asset quality weaken and pressure on provisioning increases. Major Chinese banks were key issuers of Additional Tier 1 (AT1) instruments in 2015, owing to increased pressure to shore up capital due to balance-sheet growth and slowing profitability. However, as long as assets continue to grow at a rapid pace and profitability remains subdued, there will be little underlying improvement in core capitalisation levels. Such capitalisation pressures continue to weigh on Fitch’s assessment of Chinese banks’ Viability Ratings, especially those of the mid-tier banks.

The expansion of non-interest income is likely to be a key earnings driver in 2015-2016, especially for mid-tier banks, driven by strong card and underwriting fees as well as the sale of wealth management products (WMPs). But Fitch views excessive reliance on WMPs as risky for banks, and a significant shift in the business towards this area could lead to increased credit and liquidity risks.

FYI:

image

image

Oil Firms Slow Exploration to Weather Low-Price Era The world’s biggest oil companies are draining their petroleum reserves faster than they are replacing them—a symptom of how a deep oil-price decline is reshaping energy industry priorities.

In 2015, the seven biggest publicly traded Western energy companies, including Exxon Mobil Corp. and Royal Dutch Shell PLC, replaced just 75% of the oil and natural gas they pumped, on average, according to a Wall Street Journal analysis of company data. It was the biggest combined drop in inventory that companies have reported in at least a decade.

For Exxon, 2015 marked the first time in more than two decades it didn’t fully replace production with new reserves, according to the company. It reported replacing 67% of its 2015 output. (…)

Because of accounting rules, there is another drain on the “proved reserves” that companies book and report to investors: low oil prices. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission defines proved reserves as the volume of oil and natural gas that a company can expect to tap at a profit.

Some of the reserves companies added are too expensive to extract profitably at today’s prices. That has forced some companies to remove barrels from their books, and in some cases to write down the value of those assets. (…)

Saudi Arabia loses oil market share to rivals in key nations

(…) The world’s biggest oil exporter lost ground to rivals in nine out of 15 top markets between 2013 and 2015, including China, South Africa and the US, according to an analysis of customs data.

Saudi Arabia set itself a goal in late 2014 of maintaining its crude market share amid a glut that prompted a collapse in oil prices, but the imports data compiled by FGE, an energy consultancy, suggest the country’s strategy suffered setbacks in some of its key customer countries last year.

Other data show that Saudi Arabia achieved a limited increase in global market share in 2015 compared to 2014, although last year’s figure was lower than that recorded in 2013. (…)

Saudi Aramco is using its financial muscle to buy more stakes in overseas refineries to lock in crude sales. (…)