The enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it’s the illusion of knowledge (Stephen Hawking)

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so (Mark Twain)

Invest with smart knowledge and objective odds

NEW$ & VIEW$ (18 APRIL 2014)

Philly Fed Exceeds Forecasts

Despite the fact that manufacturing activity in the New York area was weaker than expected, manufacturing in the neighboring Philadelphia region came in better than expected this morning.  With economists forecasting a headline reading of 10.0, the actual level came in at 16.6.  This was the highest reading since September (20.0), and the ninth highest reading since the recession ended in 2009.

Of the nine subcomponents, just three declined in April.  Meanwhile, we saw big increases in Shipments and New Orders.  The current level of the Shipments component is now at the highest level since March of 2011. Just as the weather slowed down activity in the winter, better weather now is causing a snapback effect as conditions revert back to normal.

Economy Thawing, Survey Finds The economy strengthened across a broad swath of the country in recent weeks, according to the Fed’s “beige book” of regional conditions, further evidence of the recovery springing back to life after a winter lull.

(…) Overall, the reports pointed to an economy poised for a spring breakout after an unusually cold winter, but with pockets of weakness lingering in some sectors and regions.

The Fed’s latest “beige book,” which describes economic conditions across the central bank’s 12 districts, reported a “modest to moderate” expansion in eight regions of the country, a general improvement in Chicago and rebound from bad weather in New York. However, contacts in the Cleveland and St. Louis districts reported a decline in economic activity. The compilation of anecdotes was provided to Fed officials ahead of their April 29-30 policy meeting.

(…) the survey said cars sales during the last week in March were “about as good as it gets” at a dealership in the Philadelphia region.

In Washington, D.C., tourist traffic for the National Cherry Blossom Festival was robust starting in March, even though cold weather pushed the peak bloom time to the second week of April. Ski resorts in much of the U.S. benefited from the extended snowy season.

There were also indicators of potential future growth in other sectors. Port volumes were higher, trucking traffic increased and steel production picked up, the survey said.

The survey showed “scattered reports” of mild price increases for some goods. Building material costs rose in Cleveland and Kansas City, and food prices increased modestly in Dallas and other areas. (…)

Labor-market conditions were reported as “generally positive,” but some employers cited difficulty in finding skilled workers for certain positions. Businesses in the Chicago region had an increased willingness to train workers both in-house and through partnerships with local schools.

Most areas of the country also reported improved manufacturing activity. (…)

Housing was one sector that didn’t fully break out of the frosty winter. Chicago real-estate brokers reported that home sales declined due to cold weather, but they were optimistic that activity would improve in coming months, the beige book said. Agents in Atlanta said higher home prices and limited selection hurt activity.

Workers’ Earnings Climb at Healthy Pace in First Quarter Are American workers finally starting to see some decent wage increases? A report Thursday offers hope, showing incomes picked up at a healthy pace in the first three months of the year.

The weekly earnings of the typical full-time worker rose 3% in the first quarter compared to a year earlier, the fastest pace since 2008, the Labor Department said. That translated into median earnings—the point at which half of all workers made more and half made less—of $796. When you adjust for inflation, median earnings are now at their highest level since the second quarter of 2012.

Even better is that the earnings growth far outpaced the 1.4% year-over-year rise in consumer prices, as measured by the Labor Department. Earnings that rise faster than costs mean workers will have more money to spend on discretionary purchases. Consumer spending is the biggest source of economic demand in the U.S. (…)

Bernard Baumohl, chief global economist for Economic Outlook Group LLC, says the latest wage increases indicate the labor market is tightening and firms are gaining enough confidence to boost labor costs. (…)

Tax Refunds May Fuel Retail Windfall Nearly 80% of the tax returns processed through April 4 resulted in a refund averaging $2,792. That bodes well for the nation’s retailers in the months ahead.

(…) Of the 100 million or so returns processed through April 4, nearly 80% resulted in a refund averaging $2,792. The total sum paid out was about $5 billion, or 2.5%, higher than a year earlier.

That bodes well for the nation’s retailers in the months ahead since many households treat returns as a windfall to be spent, not saved. Even better, Uncle Sam has been a lot quicker to whip out his checkbook than in 2013. Had that not been the case, retail-sales figures for the past two months might have looked different.(…)

And, although the dollar amounts were smaller, the impact of accelerated returns probably did much to offset the impact of frigid weather in February. An initial estimate of retail sales was revised higher for that month. For the week ended Feb. 7, for example, cumulative tax returns were $12.5 billion, or a whopping 24%, higher than at the same point a year earlier. By the end of February, that gain had fallen to 8.8%, and by the end of March, the difference was just 2.6%.

Last year was an entirely different story. At the end of February 2013, refunds were 14.3% lower than at the same point in 2012. That was mainly the result of administrative delays caused by the “fiscal cliff” standoff in Washington. The effect on spending was exacerbated by the expiration of the payroll-tax holiday. (…)

Wealthiest Households Accounted for 80% of Postrecession Rise in Incomes

A recent article by Labor Department senior economist Aaron Cobet highlights the sharp disparity between the wealthiest and poorest Americans in the aftermath of the 2007-2009 recession.

The economist mined Labor Department data to show that the top 20% of earners accounted for more than 80% of the rise in household income from 2008-2012. Income fell for the bottom 20%.

That had a direct impact on spending. The top households increased spending by about $2,300 from 2008-2012, notably on health care, transportation and education. The 20% of households with the lowest incomes cut spending by about $150.

“The decline in spending was due to lower expenditures on apparel—specifically women’s apparel,” Mr. Cobet said. Entertainment, housing, personal care, insurance, alcohol and reading also took a hit. (…)

Wealth Effect Failing to Move Wealthy to Spend

The wealth effect isn’t what it once was for the U.S. economy.

While the wealth of American households has jumped more than $25 trillion since early 2009 amid rising equity and home prices, the pass-through to consumer spending is lagging the $1 trillion fillip that would have been anticipated historically, according to Michael Feroli, chief U.S. economist at JPMorgan Chase & Co. in New York.

This means consumer spending has been exceptionally weak once wealth is accounted for, he said. With wealth gains now moderating, consumer spending could revert to what is already a weak trend, Feroli said in an April 11 report.

His calculations show that since the recession ended in 2009, households have spent 1.7 cents of every extra $1 earned in wealth. That’s less than half the 3.8-cent average implied by data between 1952 and 2009, suggesting the trend for consumer spending gains over the past three years has been less than 1 percent once the wealth effect is stripped out.

One reason for the adjustment may be that those enjoying gains in wealth are already rich, so have less propensity to increase spending incrementally. Withdrawing equity from homes has also been negative for five years.

CHINA: SLOW AND SLOWER
Home-Price Rises Slow in China Lending limits and concerns about price cuts have hit demand, analysts and property developers say.

Average new-home prices in 70 of China’s larger cities rose 7.3% from a year earlier in March, according to calculations by The Wall Street Journal based on survey data released Friday by the National Bureau of Statistics. Prices rose 0.2% on a month-to-month basis, compared with about 0.3% in February.

The year-to-year rise in February was 8.2%, down from 9% in January. This slower growth rate over the past three months compares with accelerating prices in each month of 2013. In December, for instance, the average price rise was about 9.2% compared with 9.1% in November.

Excluding public housing, prices in March rose 7.7% compared with 8.6% in February.

Housing sales for the three months ended in March fell 7.7% to 1.11 trillion yuan ($178 billion), according to official data.

Average house prices in Guangzhou rose 13.3% compared with a year earlier after jumping 15.7% in February. In Beijing prices were up 10.3% compared with 12.2% in February. Shanghai and Shenzhen gained 13.1% and 12.8% after rising 15.7% and 15.6%, respectively.

Business Insider posted some charts on China:

 industrial production

china property

According to CEBM’s latest survey, the economy has not shown significant improvement, while upward pressure on interest rates is slowly transmitting to the real economy. Our enterprise respondents said that the interest rate of loans is quite high and it is not easy to get approved. Meanwhile, the impact of tighter mortgages is also emerging; the current decline in real estate sales is not limited to second and third tier cities. First-tier cities sales have been slowing down since the end of last year. Moreover, both manufacturing capacity utilization and enterprise ROEs have recently begun to decline again.

European Car Sales Rise But Lose Momentum

large imageAuto registrations in Europe have risen again on a year-over-year basis, posting an increase of 1.6% over 12 months. This, however, is down from a 6.8% year-over-year gain in February and is the smallest gain since October 2013. Registrations were last weaker in September 2013 when registrations last declined. Smoothed percentage changes calculated from three-month moving averages show that year-over-year gains in overall registrations are 4.2% year-over-year. That’s weaker than the 5.9% gain from February and the weakest since November 2013, with October 2013 being the last time that the year-over-year moving average was negative.

By country, in March there were two declines in Germany and Spain. For Germany, this is the second consecutive decline in registrations. For Spain, the 8.5% drop offsets only some of the 13.7% gain in February.

The three-month percentage changes for total European sales are at a 13.2% annual rate decline, with a 16.8% annual rate decline for France; Germany shows a small increase of 0.6% at an annual rate over three months. However, Italy Spain and the UK show huge growth rates over three months.

Sequential growth rates show there is explosive growth in registrations from 12-months to six-months to three-months in Italy, the UK and Spain. However, France shows the opposite pattern of sales becoming progressively weaker. Germany shows sales remaining listless over most of those periods, shrinking in two out of three of them. For Europe as a whole, the pattern is one of decelerating growth with growth going from an annual rate of 1.6% over 12 months to 1% over six months to -13.2% over three months. Europe’s moving average echoes this trend.

While the headline, which focuses on the year-over-year growth rates, catches most of the attention, the trends should not be ignored. The trends show that there’s a great deal of loss of momentum even though some of the countries, notably the Mediterranean countries of Italy and Spain, are showing some explosive growth. The UK continues to post what are eye-popping numbers; after two months of decelerating, UK year-over-year growth patterns are back to acceleration.

Impact of Japan sales tax rise muted Most companies saw no sales drop in first 14 days of higher tax

Strange survey: one third of all respondents see lower sales but 75% of retailers, who are on the front line, are reporting sales declines. Then we learn that the tax increase has not been fully passed on yet.

(…) two-thirds of companies saying in a survey that April sales were holding steady or improving compared with the same month in 2013.

The survey, conducted by Reuters and made public on Friday, is one of the first attempts to measure Japanese business conditions since the April 1 increase, which has been the focus of widespread anxiety given its potential to deter consumer spending and reverse a more than year-long economic recovery. (…)

High five Unsurprisingly, the retailers were the most pessimistic, with three-quarters of respondents reporting sales declines. Many consumers stockpiled daily necessities and timed purchases of big-ticket items to beat the tax increase, creating a bump in sales for many businesses before April 1 that is now inevitably giving way to a dip.

Even so, most of the retailers who reported declines said sales were down by 10 per cent or less, a level that economists characterised as modest given the pre- buying rush.

Japan’s new VAT level of 8 per cent is still much lower than in many countries, particularly in Europe, but the increase has nonetheless caused concerns. The last increase in the tax, in 1997, contributed to a deep recession that marked the beginning of Japan’s long battle with sinking prices and wages. (…)

Pointing up In the Reuters survey, a little more than half of respondents said they had raised prices to reflect the additional tax. But nearly four in 10 manufacturers and one-third of non-manufacturers said they had left their prices unchanged, in effect absorbing the tax increase themselves and accepting lower profits.

NEW$ & VIEW$ (14 APRIL 2014)

INFLATION WATCH

As regular readers know, I am a big proponent of Bob Farrell’s rule #9: “When all the experts and forecasts agree — something else is going to happen.” Low U.S. inflation is the single most universally agreed upon economic statistic these days. Hence my watch, especially since signs abound that inflation may be picking up. This is even more important given the impact that inflation has on equity valuation and interest rates. As usual, I look at the facts:

U.S. Producer Prices Rise 0.5%

A gauge of U.S. inflation surged in March, driven by volatile categories that may not push broader price measures out of their long stretch of sluggishness.

Sleepy smile That is the common narrative to keep you sleeping well. Next is today’s reality, from the very same WSJ article:

The producer-price index for final demand, which measures changes in the prices businesses receive for their goods and services, rose a seasonally adjusted 0.5% from February, the Labor Department said Friday. It rose 0.6% excluding the volatile categories of food and energy.

Economists surveyed by The Wall Street Journal had expected the index to rise a more modest 0.1%, and predicted a 0.2% increase excluding food and energy. It had fallen 0.1% in February.

The index was up 1.4% in March from a year earlier, the biggest year-over-year increase since last August.

“It could be that the difficult weather over the past few months has distorted prices, and wholesale inflation will settle down in April,” PNC chief economist Stuart Hoffman wrote in a note to clients. “But there is also the possibility that inflation may be picking up, as firms raise prices given the recent limited acceleration in wage growth and stronger demand.” (…)

March’s 0.5% rise in the PPI was driven by prices for services, which rose a seasonally adjusted 0.7% from February, the largest one-month increase since January 2010. Trade services, a volatile category measuring margins received by wholesalers and retailers, rose 1.4% in March after falling 1% in February.

Overall prices for goods were flat in March. Food prices rose a seasonally adjusted 1.1% from February while energy prices sank 1.2%.

The prior top-line PPI reading, now known as “finished goods,” was down 0.1% in March from a month earlier, but up 1.7% from a year ago.

More facts:

Total PPI is up 2.4% annualized in the last 3 months, 1.8% annualized last 4 months (December’s was 0.0%). Core PPI is up 2.8% annualized in the last 3 months and 3.0% in the last 4months. This measures final demand.

Surprised smile Intermediate demand PPI is up 4.5% in last 3 months, 4.6% in last 4 months. Core intermediate PPI is up 2.8% (3 ms) and 2.7% (4 ms).

U.S. Import Prices Increase As Nonoil Prices Gain Strength

Import prices increased 0.6% (-0.6% y/y) during March following an unrevised 0.9% February rise. A 0.2% rise had been expected in the Action Economics survey. A 0.6% improvement (0.1% y/y) in nonpetroleum prices led the pricing strength as it followed a 0.1% February uptick. During the last three months, nonoil import prices rose at a 5.0% annual rate. Petroleum prices ticked up 0.1% (-2.4% y/y) after a 4.7% February surge.

Last month’s gain in nonpetroleum prices overall reflected a 2.1% surge (0.5% y/y) in nonpetroleum industrial supplies & materials prices. Foods, feeds and beverage prices also strengthened 3.7% (4.9% y/y). Elsewhere, pricing power remained tepid. Capital goods prices ticked 0.1% higher (-0.6% y/y) after a 0.3% drop. Automotive prices were unchanged (-1.6% y/y) as were nonauto consumer goods prices (0.4% y/y).

Amid Warnings of Low Inflation, J.P. Morgan says Prices Set to Rise The IMF again sounded the alarm bell at the weekend over low global inflation. But has the worst of anemic price rises already passed the world economy? That, at least, is the view of J.P. Morgan & Chase economists.

(…) J.P. Morgan now expects inflation to pick up. There are a few factors at play.

Global growth is picking up, with the U.S. economy leading the way. This should “gradually turn the tide away from global disinflation,” the bank said.

Agricultural commodity prices are firming this year after a 23% slide from their June 2012 peak. Partly this is due to dry weather, which has hurt global cereal crop output.

Japan’s sales-tax increase on April 1 is also likely to add to the uptick in global prices in the short term, the bank said.

That doesn’t mean the specter of disinflation has disappeared. It remains a risk in Europe, where J.P. Morgan noted the central bank has been reluctant to use additional stimulus despite low inflation.

The Bank of Japan also is expected to ease further this year as consumer demand fades in the wake of the sales-tax hike. Asia’s poor exports performance, and concerns over Chinese growth, add to the worries.

Many economists would disagree that disinflation is no longer a worry. International Monetary Fund economists, in a recent piece, argued that low inflation is as bad as disinflation, as it deters consumers from spending and companies from investing.

Still, J.P. Morgan at least is calling the bottom for prices.

Top Earners See Tax Increases The jump in federal tax rates that kicked in last year is causing sticker shock for many higher earners this tax season.

(…) The latest tax-rate increases, passed at the start of 2013, have added to that burden, at least for the highest earners. Those changes included a bump in the top ordinary income rate to 39.6% from 35%, a limit on itemized deductions and an increase in the top rate on investment income. The Obama health-care overhaul also included some tax increases, including another boost in investment taxes.

Largely as a result, overall federal tax receipts from the top 1% of earners rose by 1.3 percentage points to 29.3% of all federal tax revenue, the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center estimates. The share of overall income for the top 1%, now at around 17%, according to the Tax Policy Center, has roughly doubled since the early 1980s, according to Congressional Budget Office figures.

It isn’t just the super-rich who find their share of the burden growing. The increase in the individual income tax burden borne by the top 20%—including, say, couples with two children making more than $150,000—has gone from 65% in 1980 to more than 90% as of 2010, the most recent year available, according to the CBO. (…)

Euro-Zone Industrial Output Rises Slightly

The European Union’s statistics agency Monday said output rose by 0.2% from January, and by 1.7% from February 2013. The rise in output was in line with expectations. Eurostat also revised its calculations for January, and now estimates production was unchanged during the month, having previously recorded a decline of 0.2%.

Production of durable consumer goods fell by 1.2% from January, and were down 0.6% from February 2013. Durable goods such as washing machines and other items of household equipment are the type of nonrecurring purchases that consumers postpone if they expect to see price falls.

The rise in output wasn’t widespread across the currency area, with declines recorded in Italy, Greece, Portugal, the Netherlands and four other members. Output rose most rapidly in Ireland, while the pickup was also driven by increases in Germany, France and Spain.

image

Last 3 months: –0.1%; last 4 months: +1.5%; last 6 months: +0.7%. Only November’s +1.6% was strong and that was because of a 2.7% jump in energy production (must be the weather!) and a 2.8% one-month rise in cap. goods production.

The FT’s headline (Euro zone’s February output suggests gradual recovery strengthening) hardly supports the facts.

EARNINGS WATCH

Twenty-seven companies reported Q1 earnings and aggregators have sent their first interim reports. Factset sees EPS declining 1.6% YoY (-1.3% on March 31) but cautions that spring may actually turn out better than expected.

The estimated earnings decline for Q1 2014 of -1.6% is below the estimate of 4.3% growth at the start of the quarter (December 31). Nine of the ten sectors have recorded a decrease in expected earnings growth due to downward revisions to earnings estimates, led by the Materials, Financials, and Consumer Discretionary sectors. The only sector that has seen an increase in projected earnings growth over this period is the Utilities sector.

The estimated revenue growth rate for Q1 2014 is 2.2%, below the estimated growth rate of 3.0% at the start of the quarter (December 31). Nine of the ten sectors are predicted to report revenue growth for the quarter, led by the Health Care and Consumer Discretionary sectors. On the other hand, the Energy sector is the only sector expected to report a decline in revenue for the quarter.

The first quarter of 2014 marks the fourth time in the past 12 quarters (3 years) that a year-over-year decrease in earnings was projected at the end of a quarter, prior to the start of the earnings season for the quarter. However, the index only reported an actual decline in earnings in one of the three previous quarters (Q3 2012).

Over the past three years, 71% of companies in the S&P 500 have reported actual EPS above the mean EPS estimates on average. As a result, the earnings growth rate has increased 3.1 percentage points on average from the end of the quarter through the end of the earnings season due to these upside earnings surprises.

If this average increase is applied to the estimated earnings decline at the end of the first quarter (March 31) of -1.3%, the actual earnings growth rate for the quarter would be 1.8% (-1.3% + 3.1% = 1.8%).

image

Standard & Poors is the “official” aggregator. Their Operating Earnings are currently very different than others’ because they (rightly) treated pension liability adjustments as operating items in the last 12-15 months. S&P’s forecasts of Q1’14 EPS of $27.25, up 7.3% YoY, would bring trailing 12 months EPS to $108.78, up 1.4% from the trailing EPS after Q4’13. Q1 EPS estimates declined 1.3% from $27.60 at the end of March.

The beat rate is 54%, similar to that at the same time after Q4’13.

Analysts, taking their cue from economists and corporate officers, are blaming the Mr. Winter for the shortfall. Spring having finally arrived, estimates for the next 3 quarters have barely changed, being up 12.5%, 14.1% and 14.0% respectively.

The Rule of 20 being backward looking, it is not buoyed up by the current blue skies and warmer temperatures across the U.S.A.. Only recorded changes in inflation alters its mood. However, the recent 4.3% setback in the S&P 500 Index has brought the measured undervaluation back into the less risky darker green area. Using core inflation of 1.6%, the Rule of 20 states that fair market value is 1974 (18.4 x trailing EPS of $107.30), some 9% above current levels. If Q1 EPS reach the expected $27.25, trailing EPS will soon rise to $108.78, pulling the Rule of 20 fair value up to the “magical” 2000 level, 10.2% above current levels.

image

The Rule of 20 tool is again proving its usefulness in offering an objective, dispassionate measure of risk and reward based on actual facts. It is interesting to note that in spite of all the QEs of the world (literally) and of the radical change in sentiment (sell side, media, investors) of the past several months, the S&P 500 Index has refused to cross the “20” line into the overvalued area for the third time in this extraordinary bull market.

In  early December 2013, I wrote in ENTERING THE DARK SIDE:

The Rule of 20 suggests that fair value on the S&P 500 Index is 1869, a mere 3% above current levels. Since 1956, the Rule of 20 P/E (actual P/E + inflation) has gone through the 20 fair value level 9 out of the 13 times it rose to “20”. Another way to look at it is to say that every time the Rule of 20 P/E rose to “20”, it kept rising into the “higher risk” area except between 1963 and 1966 and since 2009.

But while the recent streak of rational valuation in the S&P 500 Index remains unbroken, it is fair to say that we did get a good dose of irrational exuberance since last December. It was simply concentrated in small caps, biotechnology and the new generation of tech stocks, now suffering a well-deserved setback.

Upside to fair value in the 10% range is the best we have seen since the summer of 2013. Since the end of August, the S&P 500 Index has appreciated 11% while trailing EPS rose 9.5% and inflation remained stable.

The S&P 500 Index has broken its (still rising) 100-day moving average (1829). Technicians would say that the next resistance stands 3% lower at 1762 which is the (still rising) 200-day m.a.. Unless Q1 earnings come in much worse than currently expected and corporate guidance sees very unseasonal weather ahead, equities should not suffer a brutal correction.

That is unless inflation surprises everybody on the upside. Much faster core inflation just as the Fed is openly fearing deflation within an “accelerating economy” would justifiably spook investors. It seems wiser to keep the equity light on the cautious yellow for a while longer. Let’s see how the Q1 earnings season ends and how inflation behaves.

SENTIMENT WATCH

Partly because of the icy winter, overall profits for companies in the S&P 500 index are expected to slip 1.2% compared with last year’s first quarter, according to FactSet. That would be the first decline since 2012’s third quarter.

Just kidding Hmmm…Factset’s April 11, 2014 Earnings Insight begins with:

The estimated earnings decline for Q1 2014 is -1.6%. If this is the final percentage for the quarter, it will mark the first year-over-year decline in earnings since Q3 2012 (-1.0%).

What the heck, let’s not get distracted by such mundane facts. On with the WSJ’s piece:

The pileup of recent stock-price losses is forcing money managers and investors to reckon with what they see as the growing possibility that stocks will be down at least 10% from their highs at some point this year. U.S. stocks haven’t fallen that much since 2011. (…)

A slide of 20% from the peak would put stocks in bear-market territory, and last week’s widespread selling deepened worries about a replay of the bear markets in 2000 and 2007. In many ways, though, the overall stock market, economy and Federal Reserve policy don’t suggest that a bear market is looming, say long time money managers and economists.

While continued turmoil in stock prices is likely, bear markets usually occur “when the Fed is trying to slow the economy down and other events intervene to make things worse,” says Ethan Harris, co-chief economist at Bank of America Merrill Lynch, part of Bank of America.

The last two bear markets struck after the Fed raised target short-term interest rates to cool inflation and a hot economy. Now the central bank is holding rates down even as it begins winding down its bond-buying program.

“The Fed’s message is that it is the good cop, not the bad cop,” Mr. Harris says.

If stocks swoon or economic growth falters, the Fed likely would try to steady the market, economists and money managers say. That wasn’t the Fed’s posture before the last two bear markets. (…)

Friday’s report of unexpectedly high wholesale inflation rattled some investors, though economists said the surprising number was due mainly to changes in the index. The bigger worries include slower growth in China and stocks that suddenly seem overvalued to many investors. That combination of factors suggests that 2014 will be mediocre for stocks but not disastrous. (…)

(…) The index has dropped 8.2% since closing at a 14-year high of 4357.97 March 5, weighed down by particular weakness in recent highflying biotechnology and technology stocks. (…)

Traders said there was no specific news behind Friday’s selloff. After a relatively quiet start to the session, volumes increased as losses accelerated. (…)

The iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology exchange traded fund slid 2.9%, and has lost 20% amid a seven-week losing streak. (…)

Plate Zoe’s Kitchen rose 65% above its initial public offering price on its first day of trading. The Mediterranean-themed restaurant chain priced its 5.8 million share offering late Thursday at $15 each.

The Highfliers Are Still Too High Internet and biotech stocks are melting down, but most of the market looks fine. Apple, yes. Twitter, no.

(…) The air has come out of stocks like Twitter (ticker: TWTR), which is off 43% to $40 from its late 2013 high, and the 3-D printing group, the subject of a bearish Barron’scover story last month, is down sharply.

Even with the selloff in the highfliers, most look richly priced because of modest earnings or outright losses (see table). A nicely profitable Facebook (FB) is an exception. Moreover, many techs continue to get valued using a dubious profit measure that ignores often enormous stock-based compensation. Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn (LNKD), Zillow (Z), andSalesforce.com (CRM) are prime offenders. (…)

Small and midsize stocks still look expensive. The Russell 2000 index trades for about 24 times estimated 2014 profits and the S&P MidCap 400 commands a P/E of 18. (…)

(…) As the lock-ups which prevented insider sales after their 2012 IPOs expired, executives and directors at companies such as Workday, ServiceNow and Splunkhave sold steadily, raising almost $750m between them over the past 12 months. (…)

Many of the sales were made through pre-arranged stock trading plans that spread disposals over a long period of time, so that corporate insiders have no discretion over the timing of individual transactions. Also, the slump in tech stocks has in many cases only wiped out the gains of the past six months, leaving share prices still above the levels at which insiders were selling for much of last year.

Among the biggest sellers, Jeff Bezos, chief executive of Amazon, raised $351m in February, taking his total sales to more than $1bn in just six months – more than three times the amount he had raised in the previous year. (…)

Sheryl Sandberg, chief operating officer of Facebook, has sold more than half her stake since the company’s IPO less than two years ago, benefiting from the steady rise in Facebook’s stock since the middle of last year. However, Ms Sandberg, whose disposals were made under a prearranged plan, began her sales when Facebook’s stock was at $21.08, well below the $58.53 it ended at last week. (…)

Roughly 11 per cent of fundraising rounds for private companies last year included some level of selling by insiders, compared with fewer than 6 per cent three years before, according to research firm PrivCo. (…)

Among insiders to take money out of their companies before going public, early backers of King Digital Entertainment, maker of the Candy Crush Saga game, were paid $504m in dividends in the months before their company went public. The company’s shares ended last week 22 per cent below their March IPO price. (…)

Three executives at Box, a cloud storage company which has posted big losses and raised questions about whether the recent tech stock rally has made it too easy for companies to become public entities, sold $11m of shares during private financings, according to the company’s prospectus.

From Goldman’s Sales & Trading Team,

The equity rout continued. Growth tech names felt the heat once again as Nasdaq led the way down, but the weakness was truly wide spread as all sectors ended in the red – both in domestic and overseas developed markets. Earnings season continued, but derisking is the name of the game in these markets. Financial feel the most pain (-1.1%) on a headline earnings miss, while Oil&Gas and Utilities finished at the top of the pack with only minor weakness.

The VIX marches higher +1.23 to 17.12.

Meanwhile:
Pro-Russia separatists defy Kiev deadline Pro-Moscow groups tighten their grip in eastern Ukraine 
Fitch Cuts Alcoa’s Rating Into Junk Territory

Fitch cut the aluminum maker’s rating one notch to double-B-plus, which is in junk territory, from the investment grade rating of triple-b-minus, and said the company’s profitability has been hampered by global oversupply in aluminum.

Fitch also called out the company’s significant pension obligations, noting that Alcoa’s aggregate pension plans were underfunded by $3.2 billion as of Dec. 31.

However, Fitch noted that the rating outlook is stable, which reflects “slowly improving trends” despite prolonged market weakness.