The enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it’s the illusion of knowledge (Stephen Hawking)

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so (Mark Twain)

Invest with smart knowledge and objective odds

NEW$ & VIEW$ (12 JANUARY 2016): 2008 Redux?

Most Retailers Beat December Estimates But Still Post Weak Results

The Thomson Reuters Same Store Sales Index actual result for December 2015 showed a gain of 0.6%. Excluding drug stores, the index registered a 0.8% comp. in both cases, the estimate was for 0% growth. (…)

Retailers are blaming the warmer-than-usual weather and a strong dollar (weaker tourist spending) for the slowdown in consumer spending. (…) Costco has the biggest weighting in our index, and posted a 1.0% SSS, and is being hurt by gasoline sales. Excluding gas, Costco posted a robust 5.0% SSS.

Looking forward to Q4, our Thomson Reuters Quarterly Same Store Sales Index, which consists of 83 retailers, is expected to post 1.1% growth for Q4 (vs. 2.8% in Q4 2014).

BTW: Over the past 7 trading days, gasoline futures have plunged -16 cents, putting retail prices, which declined to $1.96 yesterday, on track to decline over the next six weeks to $1.83. (ISI)

Bank of America: Rail Traffic Is Saying Something Worrying About the U.S. Economy

(…) “We believe rail data may be signaling a warning for the broader economy,” the recent note from Bank of America says. “Carloads have declined more than 5 percent in each of the past 11 weeks on a year-over-year basis. While one-off volume declines occur occasionally, they are generally followed by a recovery shortly thereafter. The current period of substantial and sustained weakness, including last week’s -10.1 percent decline, has not occurred since 2009.”

BofA analysts led by Ken Hoexter look at the past 30 years to see what this type of steep decline usually means for the U.S. economy. What they found wasn’t particularly encouraging: All such drops in rail carloads preceded, or were accompanied by, an economic slowdown (Note: They excluded 1996 due to an extremely harsh winter).

“Similar periods of weakness have occurred in only five other instances since 1985: (1) the majority of 1988, (2) the first half of 1991, (3) several weeks in early 1996, (4) late 2000 and early 2001, and (5) late 2008 and the majority of 2009 … all either overlapped with a recession, or preceded a recession by a few quarters.” 

Of course, many would argue that a shift away from coal-powered energy, a slowdown in the industrial sector, and the petering out of the U.S. shale boom would naturally lead to fewer goods being moved by rail. Hoexter and his team, however, suggest that the slowdown is spreading to more consumer-oriented segments. Intermodal carloads typically related to consumer goods were up 1 percent in the first quarter of 2015 and 3.6 percent in the second quarter but fell 1.7 percent in the final quarter of last year. (…)

More on this in yesterday’s New$ & View$.

ENERGY

As many as a third of American oil-and-gas producers could tip toward bankruptcy and restructuring by mid-2017, according to Wolfe Research. Survival, for some, would be possible if oil rebounded to at least $50, according to analysts. (…)

More than 30 small companies that collectively owe in excess of $13 billion have already filed for bankruptcy protection so far during this downturn, according to law firm Haynes & Boone.

Morgan Stanley issued a report this week describing an environment “worse than 1986” for energy prices and producers, referring to the last big oil bust that lasted for years. The current downturn is now deeper and longer than each of the five oil price crashes since 1970, said Martijn Rats, an analyst at the bank.

Together, North American oil-and-gas producers are losing nearly $2 billion every week at current prices, according to a forthcoming report from AlixPartners, a consulting firm, that is set to be published later this week. (…)

American producers are expected to cut their budgets by 51% to $89.6 billion from 2014, a reduction that exceeds the worst years of the 1980s, according to Cowen & Co. There is no relief in sight: The oil glut is expected to continue well into 2017, according to several banks, analysts and industry executives. (…)

If an array of U.S. shale companies go bankrupt or assets fall into new hands and bondholders get crushed, bankruptcies will wipe the debt slate clean and lower the oil price needed to fetch a profit.

Projections for losses on energy loans continue to rise broadly, and some banks have started to raise their own forecasts for such losses. In a biannual review by a trio of banking regulators, the value of loans rated as “substandard, doubtful or loss” among oil and gas borrowers almost quintupled to $34.2 billion, or 15% of the total energy loans evaluated. That compares with $6.9 billion, or 3.6%, in 2014.

The largest U.S. banks have relatively small energy portfolios in the context of their overall lending. For instance, in the third quarter Wells Fargo & Co.’s oil-and-gas loan exposure was 2% of its total loans, roughly $17 billion, according to company filings. The bank, one of the largest energy lenders in the U.S., reports earnings Friday.

Since financial distress hasn’t been a good mechanism for slowing down U.S. oil production, many analysts fear that any pullback may come too late. U.S. government estimates pegged output at 9.2 million barrels a day at the start of 2016—1% higher than the start of last year when oil was trading for 40% more.

The Energy Atlantic has arrived at Cheniere Energy’s Sabine Pass terminal in Louisiana to ship the first-ever exports of liquefied natural gas from the “lower 48” states. Though regulatory obstacles have eroded, the business climate is now daunting: prices have slumped in Asia and Europe just as large new LNG export facilities are opening in Australia and elsewhere. Liquefying and transporting gas are costly, but—ignoring the capital cost of the terminals—rock-bottom American prices mean companies may still make $2 profit for each million British Thermal Units (28 cubic metres) shipped, reckons Timera Energy, a consultancy. The exports will also change global gas pricing, because American LNG contracts are linked to the Henry Hub benchmark in Louisiana, not the world oil market. Even slim pickings for shippers won’t stop more convergence in global LNG prices as American exports go to the highest bidder. (The Economist)

Canada: How cheap is the CAD?

In a speech last week, Bank of Canada Governor Poloz argued that the current decline in commodity prices is one of the most complex shocks that a policy-maker can face. Under these circumstances, the most important facilitator of adjustment is a flexible exchange rate. As today’s Hot Chart shows, the Canadian dollar has come a long way. At this time last year, when the Bank of Canada surprised markets with a rate cut, the CAD was overvalued against both its PPP or the “Big Mac” index produced by The Economist. One year later, the loonie is the most undervalued in a decade against both measures. Against this backdrop, we believe that the Governor was justified to mention that “other complementary” policies can be deployed to offer a broader array of buffers while still encouraging the necessary longer-term adjustments to the Canadian economy, including fiscal policy. (NBF)

image

Nerd smile Just so you know, the correlation between the CAD and WTI is 0.94 since 2013…

What is the probability of the RMB seeing sharp depreciation (to 7 and beyond) against USD?

From CEBM Research:

Not very probable. First, the suggestion that the RMB must undergo significant devaluation carries a hidden assumption, that is, knowledge of where the RMB ‘equilibrium’ exchange rate should be. But FX rates are different from interest rates. No one knows where an equilibrium exchange should be. Hence, relying on market forces alone, and allowing speculators to profit through short selling, it’s very possible that the RMB would overshoot its fundamental value. The PBoC’s new press release indicates the post-reform RMB exchange rate will abide by market forces. By this they mean obeying the demand and supply for foreign currency by real economy, not by the needs of leveraged, pro-cyclical speculators.

Second, a massive devaluation will bring little stimulus to China’s exports in the short-term. Before November 2015, China accounted for 13% of global exports. In 1993, Japan’s share of global exports peaked at 9.8%. We do not know if there is a ceiling on a country’s share of global exports, but we do know that as a country’s share of global exports increases its ability to stimulate incremental exports via exchange rate devaluation weakens. In China’s case, given its high share of global exports, devaluation will not be extremely effective in generating incremental external demand driven growth. Also, as emerging market currencies increasingly follow the RMB, China’s ability to stimulate marginal export demand growth via devaluation also weakens. Furthermore, competitive devaluation causes capital to flee emerging markets, resulting in zero or negative effect on China and other emerging economies.

It’s worth noting, right after the August 11th reforms, overseas investors initially believed that the Chinese government was trying to devaluate to lift exports, leading to further pessimism towards the health of Chinese economy. This is one of the reasons that commodities prices began to fall along with a number of other asset prices. In retrospect, there have been disagreements over the magnitude and timing of the August 11th devaluation. But at the time, the PBoC’s primary goal was to make the exchange rate more flexible, which would give domestic monetary policy more space to maneuver. Stimulating exports was not the primary consideration.
Third, even if massive devaluation can be tried as a matter of economics, the political feasibility is nil. A massive devaluation would trigger harsh criticism and pressure from the U.S., especially given the upcoming presidential election. Furthermore, a massive devaluation would hinder the Federal Reserves ability to guide monetary policy expectations. As we saw last September, the Fed did not raise rates in part due to RMB instability. Thus, RMB volatility, if it continues, may jeopardize the expected March rate hike. In addition, since the August 11th reforms, domestic firms have made the natural choice to reduce foreign currency denominated leverage. But a sharp depreciation makes retiring outstanding foreign currency debt even harder.

However, should any of the scenarios listed below happen in 2016, the possibility that the RMB will depreciate above USD/CNY= 7 will increase:

1) The Federal Reserve makes repeated rate hikes and the dollar strengthens significantly.
2) The Chinese economy has a hard landing and recedes along all sectors.
3) Major policy mistakes.

Worst Case Scenario:

A lack of sufficient intervention to support the USD/CNY exchange rate could lead to entrenched expectations for depreciation, a rapid rundown on FX reserves, falling RMB denominated asset prices and panic that would likely spread to global markets. The likelihood of this scenario playing out in 2016 in our opinion remains low for several reasons: (1) China will maintain a current account surplus in 2016 helping to maintain its FX reserve war chest;(2) The relative yield advantage on RMB assets will help to keep net outflow levels at a manageable level; (3) China’s economy remains relatively strong compared to other countries and still has plenty of room for reforms to unlock potential growth; (4) administrative measures in the form of capital & current account controls or a move back to a stronger peg with the USD can be implemented if necessary.

Ninja Official Says China Has Tools to Defeat Bets Against Yuan Wagers that the yuan will slump 10% or more against the dollar are “ridiculous and impossible,” a senior Chinese economic official said Monday, warning that China had a sufficient tool kit to defeat attacks on its currency.
Punch It’s About The Dollar, Not The Renminbi

Good piece by Charles Gave via John Mauldin:

In my 50 year career working in financial markets, I have never seen the money supply of one country move across the border to another country. Hence I must confess to being perplexed when reading recent commentary fretting about “capital flight” from China.(…)

Capital flight episodes have, in fact, almost always occurred at times when a country’s money supply has an unsustainable counterpart in foreign debt. When circumstances conspire so that servicing this debt becomes difficult, the outcome is usually a plunging money supply, soaring short rates and a collapse in economic activity; Thailand in 1997-98 was a classic case. The standard precursor to such an emerging market crisis is for an economy to run a current account deficit, and so rely on capital inflows. I have never seen such a financial crisis unfold when the country in question was running a large current account surplus. (…)

As I see it, the main risk in the current turmoil is not that the renminbi declines due to Farmer Wong shifting his savings abroad, but rather as a result of the dollar soaring against all other currencies; in particular against the currencies where domestic players have received lots of dollar loans from Chinese banks (commodity producers in particular). This, of course, is what happened in 1981-1985 and to an extent in 2008-09 as a result of a massive short-covering exercise that caused the dollar deposit base outside of the US to shrink brutally.

So my advice remains not to watch the renminbi, but instead to keep focused on the US dollar. A debt deflation always occurs when the currency in which the debt is denominated starts to rise for reasons that nobody understands. We may be at that very point.

Auto CHINA VEHICLE SALES JUMP

December sales were 2.79 million units, up 15.6% YoY. ISI calculates that sales rose 5.9% MoM seasonally adjusted. For all of 2015, sales were up 4.6% after +6.8% in 2014.

Hot smile I am a big fan of Christopher Wood, the strategist at CLSA. Chris is a smart, poised, out-of-the-box thinker. Long-time reader Gary is kind enough to occasionally send me Chris’ pieces. Some excerpts (my emphasis).

  • Liquidity???

(…) Concerns about liquidity in the debt markets usually relates to redemptions engulfing open ended mutual funds. And it is certainly the case that US high-yield funds have seen significant net redemptions over the past two years. Thus, US high-yield bond mutual funds recorded US$33bn of net outflows in the year to 16 December 2015, following a US$44bn outflow in 2014. But a further aggravating factor, which has not received the attention it should have done, is the growth in debt exchange traded products (ETFs) in recent years. Net assets in US bond ETFs have risen sixfold, from US$57bn at the end of 2008 to US$342bn at the end of November 2015.

image

It should be noted that ETFs began life as an equity product. GREED & fear does not believe in ETFs because they involve an insidious commoditisation of investment. But equity ETFs are more defensible because stocks are listed on an exchange. It is hard to see how ETFs can replicate debt markets in a liquidity panic, most particularly when such bonds are not even listed on an exchange. GREED & fear is sure there are lots of complicated explanations arguing the opposite. But GREED & fear does not believe them – just as GREED & fear did not believe self-interested apologists for complicated securitisations back in 2006. In this respect, debt ETFs have created a dangerous illusion of liquidity that does not exist in such over-the-counter markets. (…)

Alhambra calculated gross issuance of junk bonds, leveraged loans and collateralised loan obligations (CLOs) in America in the three-year period between 2012 and 2014 as totalling US$2.8tn. This was contrasted with US$1.3tn of total subprime mortgage loans outstanding in March 2007 at the onset of the housing crisis. Including gross issuance in 2015, the tally rose to US$3.6tn.

There is, then, more than enough dodgy dollar-funded debt out there, both onshore and offshore, to trigger renewed credit concerns, with refinancing risk the obvious catalyst. This is likely to take the deflationary form of rising credit spreads in the context of a flattening yield curve. This is why the base case here remains that, when presented with the financial equivalent of “withdrawal symptoms” in the form of rising credit spreads and related collateral damage in stock markets, the Fed will reverse its stance on monetary policy and resume easing – which is, by the way, the same reversal of policy carried out by every other central bank in the developed world which has tried to tighten monetary policy since 2008. Examples include Sweden, Norway, Australia and the ECB. (…)

  • This is where the oil dividend went.

As regards the condition of the American economy, the biggest surprise to the consensus prevailing at the start of 2015 was the continuing failure of consumption to pick up more robustly despite the steep decline in energy prices, as reflected in continuing lacklustre retail sales data. (…)

Still, the anaemic consumption trend should not surprise given the continuing lack of wage growth for the average American; the psychological trauma triggered by the 2008 financial crisis; and the collapse in interest income on savings as a result of seven years of zero rates. It is also worth GREED & fear mentioning again the squeeze on discretionary spending posed by rising healthcare costs and rising rents in America. US personal spending on healthcare and insurance increased by US$151bn over the 12 months to November, accounting for 43% of the US$355bn increase in total personal consumption expenditure over the same period. (…)

image

As for rents, Zillow Research reported that rents rose by 3.8%YoY in November, while a recent study by the Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University (America’s rental housing – Expanding options for diverse and growth demand, 9 December 2015) showed that the number of “cost-burdened” renter households (defined as households paying more than 30% of income for housing) rose from 14.8m in 2001 to a record 21.3m in 2014. While the share of cost-burdened renters rose from 49% of all renters in 2013 to 49.3% in 2014, near its all-time high of 50.8% reached in 2011. (…)

SENTIMENT WATCH

Distance from 52 week highThe chart to the right is an update to one we included in a B.I.G. Tips report last Thursday which showed the average percentage decline stocks have seen from their 52-week highs based on market cap and sectors.  Through Friday’s close, stocks in the S&P 500 (large cap stocks in the S&P 1500) were down an average of 22.5% from their respective 52-week highs.  Mid-cap stocks, which make up the S&P 400 index were down an average of 26.5% from their 52-week highs, and small-cap stocks (S&P 600) were the worst of the bunch with an average decline of more than 30% from their 52-week highs.  With everyone focused on the S&P 500’s 10% decline from its intraday high last May, the majority of stocks in America are already in their own bear market.

The chart below breaks down the average percentage decline of stocks in the S&P 1500 by sector.  This chart clearly outs the Energy sector as the primary driver of weakness in US equities. Through Friday’s close, the average decline for stocks in that sector has declined more than 50% from its 52-week high. That’s more than cut in half!  After Energy, the next weakest sector is Materials, but with the average stock in that sector ‘only’ losing a third of its value, it doesn’t seem that bad relative to Energy.  In terms of sectors where stocks have held up the best, at 14.3% and 18.5%, respectively, Utilities and Consumer Staples are the only two sectors where the average stock is not in bear market territory.

Distance from 52 week high by sector

Is this really 2008 all over again?

GEORGE Soros’s record is sufficiently impressive, particularly on macro-economic calls, that it is worth taking notice when he sounds the alarm. His latest suggestion is that the current environment reminds him of 2008, the prelude to one of the worst bear markets in history. The reputation of George Osborne, Britain’s finance minister, is nothing like as elevated but he is also set to warn today that the current year may be the toughest for the global economy since the financial crisis. 

Stockmarkets certainly seem to be acting as if Mr Soros might be right. (…)

So is it 2008? Mainstream forecasters aren’t predicting recession (but they never do). The World Bank has cut its forecast for global growth in 2016 from 3.3% to 2.9% (although that would be better than 2015’s outturn). Perhaps one should look at the trend in forecasts, rather than the outright level; back in January 2008, Federal Reserve governors were looking for 1.3-2% growth that year. That was way too optimistic, but the direction of travel was right; the previous range of forecasts (in October 2007) had been 1.7% to 2.5%. Falling commodity prices and (in the first few days of the trading year) falling bond yields are an indication that investors are worried about growth.

There are certainly signs of weakness in the manufacturing sector. The US manufacturing ISM indicator is at 48.2, below the crucial 50 level; the long-term picture shows that it has been weaker than this level, without indicating recession, but a fall below 45 would be a pretty reliable signal of a downturn. China’s manufacturing PMI is at the same level. Global trade is also sluggish; something that economists struggle to understand.

On the other hand, the services sector (by far the largest part of developed economies) is pretty robust; its December ISM was 55.3 in the US. The ADP figures showed a strong rise in US employment in December (the non-farm payrolls are out tomorrow). And not all the news in manufacturing is bad. German new orders were up 1.5% in November, the second consecutive strong monthly rise, prompting Andreas Rees of Unicredit to argue that 

the widespread pessimism, especially on stock markets, is largely exaggerated. Instead of further steep plunges in foreign demand for German exporters, it looks as if there is a turnaround.

A judicious view might be that global growth is still sluggish, but it will probably need some trigger to plunge it into outright recession. Geopolitics is one possibility; Iran has just accused Saudi Arabia of bombing its embassy in Yemen and if the Sunni-Shia proxy war turned into a real war, that would surely have a powerful impact.

But the 2008 parallel can only be sustained if we are talking about a debt bubble bursting, and Mr Soros specifically focused on China. 

To the extent there was euphoria and rampant speculation (as there was in 2006-07), we are really talking about China rather than Europe or the US.

As the chart shows, there has been a sharp rise in China’s debt-to-GDP ratio, with a 50 percentage point increase in the last four years. Just as with the sub-prime loan boom in the US, a rapid increase in debt suggests that loans are being made without sufficient attention being made to credit quality and that resources are being misallocated. The general consensus, however, is that China can handle a debt crisis; state control of the economy is much greater and the government has trillions of dollars of reserves with which to rescue the banks if it needs to. Nor are Chinese banks as tied into the western financial system as Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns were; the contagion will be limited.

Of course, this state control means that non-performing loans are not recognised as quickly as they are in the west and that, as a result, struggling companies do not go out of business. These zombies hang around and make it much more difficult for competitors (including western companies) to be profitable. So the contagion effect will not be via the financial system but via corporate profits. 

John-Paul Smith of Ecstrat, a noted bear on China, argues that

Whilst the majority of industrial enterprises have reacted to the slowdown in demand in a rational manner by reducing capex as proportion of sales, the aggregate impact of their actions is exacerbating the pronounced deflationary tendencies in the broader economy, so that capacity utilisation at the majority of enterprises is still falling, while debt levels continue to move higher.

The fear is that the Chinese authorities, desperate to avoid the social unrest that would result from unemployment if businesses fail, will choose instead to devalue their currency. The yuan has weakened at a measured pace already in 2016 and investors have reacted with concern, but the shock would come from a much bigger fall. China’s real effective exchange rate (see the chart from the St Louis Fed) is now 130, compared with an index level of 100 in 2010. 

Capital flight from China is already occurring and the stock market falls are likely to encourage more outflows. As Mr Smith points out

aggressive intervention to shore up the currency by selling dollars from the FX reserves, will tighten domestic liquidity and therefore risk exacerbating the very conditions, which have brought about capital flight in the first place, thereby triggering a vicious circle.

If China devalues, then other Asian nations will come under pressure to follow suit, for fear of losing competitive position. That will trigger worries about those Asian companies that have borrowed in dollars. There could be banking issues in Asia (read more about emerging market debt problems here).

This is a potentially worrying scenario. Whether 2008 is the right parallel is another matter. If the bearish case does come true, then it sounds more like 1998 when a round of Asian devaluations was triggered by the realisation that growth had been fuelled by speculation. Western economies did manage to overcome that crisis. The real worry is that emerging countries are a lot more important for the global economy than they were back then.

Plunges in commodity prices bleed into the core. When the core PCE deflator slowed in 1985-1987, the Fed eased. When the core PCE deflator slowed in 1996-1998, the Fed eased.

  • 4 Reasons This Is Probably Not A Good Time To Freak Out (ISI’s Ed Hyman)

We have just had the worst start to the year in two decades.  A client/friend sent us an email yesterday, “Why aren’t you freaking out?”  Here are 4 reasons why:

1. The US expansion is slow but solid, and the next recession is still years out.

2. US wages are accelerating, but the CPI is not, ie, price inflation is still MIA.

3. Fed policy is still “extremely expansionary”, ECB and BoJ are still expanding their balance sheets, and PBoC is in an easing cycle. The US yield curve is still positive.

4. We believe that China growth is stabilizing and that the SHCOMP is likely to end the year up.

Citigroup’s Buiter Sees One-in-Three Chance of U.K. Exiting EU
Call me Apple: Live long and suffer 

(…) That cuts both ways, though. A recent survey by Accenture found that the proportion of consumers who expected to buy a smartphone in the next 12 months had fallen to 48 per cent from 54 per cent last year; the drop was particularly severe in China. Another survey by Mizuho found that 81 per cent of iPhone users expected to hang on to their next device for longer, an estimated 27 months compared with 20 months. The iPhone 5 has demonstrated more staying power than previous versions of the device; it has not yet been rendered obsolete by more processing power or killer features from subsequent iterations. In Apple’s sales pitch to worrywart shareholders, that is the wrong sort of iPhone endurance. (FT Lex)

NEW$ & VIEW$ (11 JANUARY 2016): Lengthy post but worth it, I think…

Hiring Ends Year on Strong Note, but Wage Growth Remains Sluggish Employers capped last year with impressive job growth in December, the latest sign of a stable U.S. economy in the face of international headwinds.

Hiring Ends Year on Strong Note, but Wage Growth Remains Sluggish(…) U.S. employers added 292,000 jobs in December to bring 2015’s total job gain to 2.7 million, the Labor Department said Friday. Last year trails only 2014 as the best year for job creation since 1999. (…)

Strong hiring in construction due to unseasonably warm weather is likely to reverse in January and February. The burgeoning e-commerce industry boosted employment in transportation and warehousing during the holiday season, but those jobs could prove temporary. Even the latest Star Wars film appears to have boosted employment in the movie industry by an unusually large number, a force not likely to persist. (…)

Services firms, which range from repair shops to hospitals, accounted for almost 90% of all jobs created in the U.S. last year. Manufacturing, a sector feeling the brunt of the export slowdown tied to a stronger dollar, added 35,000 jobs in 2015 after adding more than 200,000 in 2014. The mining sector, which includes oil and gas extraction, shed nearly 130,000 jobs last year. (…)

Average hourly earnings slipped by a penny in December from November. Wages were up 2.5% from a year earlier, among the best annual gains of the current expansion, but the improvement remains below historical averages. (…)

But some economists point out that the latest data may have understated December wages because the week in which the survey was conducted didn’t include the 15th, a popular payday, as it typically does. (…)

The labor force grew by nearly a half-million people in December, a factor that helped hold the unemployment rate at 5% despite strong hiring. The labor-force participation rate ticked up to 62.6% in December, but it remains down from a year ago, and is still near a 40-year low.

A broader measure of unemployment that includes Americans stuck in part-time jobs or too discouraged to look for work stayed at 9.9% in December and has been virtually unchanged since September. (…)

  • U.S. employers added a seasonally adjusted 292,000 jobs in December. The prior two months were revised up by a combined 50,000–employers added 307,000 jobs in October and 252,000 in November.
  • Professional and business services led last month’s job creation, adding 73,000 jobs, followed by gains in construction, health care, food services and drinking places.  Employment in mining shrank by 8,000 in December and the industry has posted job losses every month since December 2014.
Merrill: Warm Weather “added nearly 100,000 jobs in December”

The average temperature in December was 38.6 degrees, versus the previous record of 37.7 and the historical average of 33.2. If we create a national aggregate for temperature which is weighted by state population instead of area, we see an even bigger divergence from the norm in December. The appeal of using population weights is that it will put more emphasis on the temperature in the areas which have a greater economic contribution.

Another proxy for gauging the weather in the winter is to show heating degree days, which measures the demand for energy to heat houses or businesses … the deviation from the norm for heating degree days in December and this past month was literally off the charts. (…)

Plugging in the December temperature and snowfall data to the output of the model from Bloesch and Gouri, we find that the weather can explain about 97,000 of job growth. This would imply that without the weather distortion, the economy would have added 195,000 jobs. While we don’t want to give a false sense of precision, this seems like a reasonable approximation. Before the sharp acceleration the past three months, job growth was trending at around 200,000 a month.

image

U.S. Consumer Credit Grew Slowly in November Americans’ outstanding debt tab grew at the second-slowest pace of the year in November—climbing at an annual 4.8% rate—as they appeared to rein in borrowing for higher education, masking a pickup in credit-card debt.

Outstanding consumer credit, a measure of all debt besides mortgages, rose by $13.95 billion, or at an annual 4.8% rate in November, the Federal Reserve said Friday. That is a tapering from October, when it rose at a downwardly revised annual rate of 5.4%, and the slowest pace since January 2015. It is a sharp drop from September’s rate of 9.9%.

Revolving credit, mostly credit cards, rose at an annual 7.4% rate, a steep increase from October’s downwardly revised rate of 0.1%. Nonrevolving credit rose at an annual 3.8% rate, its slowest pace since October 2011, and a drop from the downwardly revised 7.3% annual rate notched in October 2015.

Weak U.S. wholesale inventories point to slower fourth-quarter growth
RAIL DERAILED

The Association of American Railroads published its December monthly rail traffic indicator on Friday, providing a most up-to-date never-revised snapshot of the U.S. economy. If you had any doubt that U.S.manufacturing is in serious recession showing no signs of improvements, these up-to-date facts will change your view (my emphasis):

  • imageDecember 2015 was a lousy month in a lousy quarter for U.S. rail carloads. U.S. railroads originated 1,219,443 carloads in December 2015, down 15.6% from December 2014. That’s the biggest year-over-year monthly percentage decline since August 2009. December 2015 was the 11th straight year-over-year monthly decline.
  • Weekly average carloads of 243,889 in December 2015 were the lowest for any month since January 1988 when our data begin.
  • Weekly average carloads in the fourth quarter of 2015 were down 11.3% from the fourth quarter of 2014, the biggest year-over-year quarterly percentage decline since the third quarter of 2009. Average weekly carloads in 2015’s fourth quarter — 260,424 — were the second lowest for any quarter since 1988, behind only the second quarter of 2009.
  • Just four of the 20 carload commodity categories the AAR tracks were up in December 2015 over December 2014. That’s the fewest for any month since October 2009.
  • Motor vehicles and parts were the biggest bright spot for U.S. carload traffic in 2015, with year-over-year gains in nine of the 12 months (including eight of the final nine months of 2015).
  • For months, carloads of commodities related to steel have been hurting badly. That continued in December. Combined, carloads of four steel-related commodity groups were down 25.6% YoY in December 2015. Here at RTI we don’t claim to be experts on the steel industry, but we do know that the huge recent decline in the crude oil rig count has had a negative impact on steel production. (According to Baker Hughes, the U.S. oil rig count totaled 698 for the week of December 31, 2015, down 1,113 rigs (or 61.5%) from the same period in 2014 and the lowest level since the second week of September 1999.)
  • Carloads of petroleum and petroleum products fell 20.5% in December 2015, probably mainly because of a decline in carloads of crude oil, which accounts for approximately half of this traffic category. Carloads peaked in the fall of 2014 and by the end of 2015 were approximately 25% below their peak. Carloads fell in nine of the 12 months of 2015, including the last seven.
  • imageExcluding coal and grain, carloads were down 7.3% in December, also their biggest decline since October 2009.
  • Carloads of industrial products, an aggregation of a variety of rail commodities used in various manufacturing industries, were down 7.4% in December 2015 from December 2014, their tenth straight year-over-year monthly decline and their biggest percentage decline since November 2009. As we said last month when talking about disappointing November rail traffic data, December’s rail data confirm, along with the PMI and manufacturing output, that manufacturing is going through a very rough patch right now, and it’s not confined to energy- and steel-related sectors.

Manufacturing accounts only for 12% of the U.S. economy but, together with Energy and Materials, it impacts nearly 20% of the S&P 500 Index. S&P Energy company earnings cratered 59% in 2015 while Materials were down 8.1% and Industrials 1.1% while the other 7 S&P sectors saw earnings growth averaging 8.3% last year. Manufacturing also impacts European equity earnings meaningfully as this GS chart shows:

image

Intermodal traffic is more a reflection of what’s going on in the retail end of the economy. The inventory correction is still on:

  • U.S. rail intermodal originations set a new annual record in 2015, up 1.6% over 2014, the previous record. 2015 was the sixth straight annual increase for U.S. intermodal traffic.
  • The year ended poorly. In December 2015, U.S. railroads originated 1,179,907 containers and trailers, down 0.7% from December 2014. Year-over-year monthly intermodal volume has fallen on U.S. railroads three months in a row, something that hasn’t happened since November 2009. In the fourth quarter of 2015, intermodal volume was down 1.1% from the fourth quarter of 2014. In the second half of 2015, intermodal volume was down 0.8% from the second half of 2014.

Oil Seen Heading to $20 by Morgan Stanley

A rapid appreciation of the U.S. dollar may send Brent oil to as low as $20 a barrel, according to Morgan Stanley.

Oil is particularly leveraged to the dollar and may fall between 10 to 25 percent if the currency gains 5 percent, Morgan Stanley analysts including Adam Longson said in a research note dated Jan. 11. A global glut may have pushed oil prices under $60 a barrel, but the difference between $35 and $55 is primarily the U.S. dollar, according to the report.

“Given the continued U.S. dollar appreciation, $20-$25 oil price scenarios are possible simply due to currency,” the analysts wrote in the report. “The U.S. dollar and non-fundamental factors continue to drive oil prices.” (…)

Morgan Stanley is not the first to forecast a drop to $20 oil, but its reasons differ from other banks. Goldman Sachs Group Inc. has said there’s a possibility storage tanks will reach their limit, pushing crude down to levels necessary to force an immediate halt to some production. (…)

  • Fed’s Williams: “We Got It Wrong” “The Fed got it wrong when it predicted a drop in oil prices would be a big boon for the economy. It turned out the world had changed; the US has a lot of jobs connected to the oil industry.”
CHINA
PBOC Vows to Maintain Prudent Monetary Policy in Year Ahead

The People’s Bank of China said it would seek to keep the yuan’s exchange rates “basically stable” at reasonable and equilibrium level and work to further promote the internationalization of the currency, the monetary authority said Friday in a statement on its website. The PBOC also said it would continue to offer credit support to some key areas and lower social-financing costs with multiple tools, including the Pledged Supplemental Lending and Medium-term Lending facilities.

Intervention Is Worsening China’s Market Woes The country’s economy is open enough that the Communist Party doesn’t fully control it, but leaders can’t resist meddling, exacerbating market turbulence.

(…) Deteriorating fundamentals, not just speculation, are weighing on stocks and the currency. The economy is slowing and may undershoot the party’s informal 6.5% growth goal. The slowdown has been led by heavy industry and real estate, which are plagued by excess capacity and unsold property, in part the consequence of prior stimulus ordered up by the government that helped repel the global recession.

Economists at UBS estimate that if China’s growth slumped to 4% this year (versus their forecast 6.2%), it would slice half a percentage point off U.S. growth, 0.8 point off Europe’s and 2.6 points off Japan’s. This is why global stock and commodity prices have been so sensitive to Chinese developments.

At their Central Economic Work Conference in December, party leaders recognized some slowdown was inevitable when they prioritized reducing excess capacity. That conference also suggested that monetary and fiscal policy would be used not to prop up obsolete industries, but to stimulate demand more broadly and thereby ease the transition for workers laid off by downsizing companies into new jobs. It also indicated that bankruptcy would no longer be off limits for state-owned companies. People’s Daily Online, a party mouthpiece, quoted an “authoritative insider” as saying. “Turbulence cannot be entirely avoided, but it is worthwhile turbulence.”

Such rhetoric isn’t new. A year after becoming Communist Party chief in 2012, Xi Jinpingpledged to give markets a “decisive” role in the economy. But reality has been different. An overhaul of state-owned enterprises unveiled in September suggested bureaucrats would seek to merge companies suffering from excess capacity, rather than let such companies fail.

This may be less disruptive economically and politically in the short run because it would avoid loan defaults and minimize job cuts. But Haibin Zhu of J.P. Morgan notes that means debt will keeping mounting, productivity and growth will slide further, and rolling over loans to “zombie companies will crowd out the financing for other companies (especially from new sectors).” (…)

PBOC PUT? Li Signals No Major Stimulus While Past Suggests a Cut

(…) Policy makers wouldn’t seek strong stimulus or flood the economy with too much investment to boost demand, Beijing News cited Premier Li Keqiang as saying. The central government’s website republished that report Sunday, and the official Xinhua News Agency cited the comments on its online front page on Monday.

What’s not clear is whether that rules out near-term monetary stimulus, or just the extent of any upcoming move. (…)

“We are not going to use ‘strong stimulus’ or ‘flood irrigation’ investment to expand domestic demand,” Li was cited as saying in the Beijing News report. Instead, policies will seek to develop new business models and create new drivers for the economy, Li said according to the report. (…)

China Not Facing ‘Cataclysmic’ Economic Slow Down, Says Stiglitz

(…) “There’s always been a gap between what’s happening in the real economy and financial markets,” said Stiglitz. “What’s happening in China is a slowdown by all accounts. It’s a slow process of slowing down. But it’s not a cataclysmic” slowdown. (…)

Stiglitz said the government’s new focus on supply-side economic reforms could precipitate a deeper downturn if not accompanied by measures to boost demand.  (…)

“The focus just on supply measures doesn’t pick up what’s happening in the global economy,” said Stiglitz. “What’s going on is a shortfall in global demand. China has immersed itself in this global economy. There are domestic things that are affecting it and exacerbating it, but if they don’t have enough demand-side measures there could be a deeper downturn.” (…)

China will find it tough to achieve over 6.5 percent growth over 2016-2020: state adviser
China’s consumer inflation up just 1.6% Producer price inflation falls 5.9% year on year in December

December’s 1.6 per cent rise in consumer prices compares with 1.5 per cent in November. (…)

Yu Qiumei, an NBS statistician, attributed the slight rise in the consumer price index last month to colder weather in December, which boosted the price of fresh produce. Food prices rose by 2.7 per cent year on year in December. Ms Yu also said the weak PPI figure resulted from a fall in the price of oil, natural gas and refined petroleum products. (…)

Food prices rose 2.7% YoY while non-food prices rose 1.1%. Prices of consumer goods gained 1.5% and services advanced 2.1%.

SENTIMENT WATCH

charts(Bespoke Investment)

  • Outlook Dims After Bad Week for Stocks The Dow industrials tumbled more than 1,000 points this week, marking the worst first five days of any year, as volatility across the globe rattled investors.Traders said they are bracing for further big swings.

(…) The Dow Jones Industrial Average lost 1,078.58 points in the first week of 2016, down 6.2%. The broader S&P 500 was down 6%, also its worst five-day start to a year, and the Nasdaq Composite Index was down 7.3%. (…)

Corporate-earnings reports are widely expected to be underwhelming. The strong dollar is weighing on the competitiveness of U.S. exporters and the dollar value of companies’ overseas sales. Oil prices, which fell below $33 a barrel Friday in New York before closing at $33.16, continue to weaken. And China’s growth remains slow. (…)

Two years ago, the wireless carrier’s executives were celebrating the sale of $6.5 billion in junk-rated bonds—a record offering that underscored investors’ demand for riskier debt as the Federal Reserve kept interest rates low.

Those bonds sold at par—100 cents on the dollar—but are now trading near 75. Most of the losses occurred over the past two months.

The deep decline shows how quickly enthusiasm has cooled for debt rated double-B-plus or worse. Heavily indebted companies such as Sprint could face stingier investors and much higher costs when it comes time to refinance. About $120 billion of junk-rated debt comes due in 2016, a figure that grows to $430 billion in 2020, according to a report from Standard & Poor’s. (…)

The market passed a key test Thursday, asMicrosemi Corp. sold $450 million worth of debt in the first junk-bond offering of 2016. But the bonds, which mature in 2023 and will help fund an acquisition, were priced to yield 9.125%—showing how it has become more costly for low-rated companies to fund themselves. (…)

  • Cash Is Back at Pensions, Funds U.S. public pension plans and mutual funds are sheltering more of their holdings in cash than they have in years, a sign of growing stress in financial markets.

(…) Large public retirement systems and open-end U.S. mutual funds have yanked nearly $200 billion from the market since mid-2014, according to a Wall Street Journal analysis of the most recent data available from Wilshire Trust Universe Comparison Service, Morningstar Inc. and the federal government.

That leaves pension funds with the highest cash levels as a percentage of assets since 2004. For mutual funds, the percentage of assets held in cash was the highest for the end of any quarter since at least 2007. (…)

Pension funds are wrestling with demographic challenges in addition to uncertain markets. Large retirement systems now have fewer active workers than retired or inactive members as Americans age, according to a Milliman Inc. report from November. That means pension officials need more money on hand to pay out benefits. (…)

Many mutual funds are facing rising requests for withdrawals from retiring Americans. About 10,000 baby boomers turn 65 every day. (…)

Still, not all asset managers are stashing away cash.

One of the nation’s largest retirement systems, the Teacher Retirement System of Texas, has just 0.2% of its assets in cash, lower than its target of 1%, according to public documents. Chief Investment Officer Britt Harris said in an email that after a decline in high-yield bonds last month, the buying opportunities were “the best we’ve seen over the past several years.”

Other portfolio managers view piles of cash as a potential drag on returns if held for too long. Elaine Stokes, who is part of a team that oversees $86.5 billion in assets at the Boston-based fund manager Loomis Sayles & Co., said she added to cash holdings in the early part of 2015, but began buying higher-quality commodity-related bonds in August.

She said she plans to buy more in the coming weeks. “It’s tough to hold cash for too long when you’re not getting paid anything on it,” Ms. Stokes said.

EARNINGS WATCH

Pointing up Earnings for the fourth quarter also include data for the full year and tend to be accompanied by new management forecasts. This is the most important quarter for earnings and the most watched.

The facts from Factset:

In terms of earnings estimate revisions for the S&P 500, analysts lowered earnings estimates for Q4 2015 within average levels. Estimated EPS for the fourth quarter fell by 4.2% during the quarter. This percentage decline was larger than the trailing 5-year average (-3.8%) but smaller than the trailing 10-year average (-5.2%) for a quarter.

As a result of the downward revisions to earnings estimates, the estimated year-over-year earnings decline for Q4 2015 is –5.3% today, which is higher than the expected decline of -0.6% at the start of the quarter (September 30). If the Energy sector is excluded, the estimated earnings growth rate for the S&P 500 would jump to 0.0% from -5.3%.

As a result of downward revisions to sales estimates, the estimated sales decline for Q4 2015 is -3.3%, which is also higher than the estimated year-over-year sales decline of -1.1% at the start of the quarter. If the Energy sector is excluded, the estimated revenue growth rate for the S&P 500 would jump to 1.1% from -3.3%.

Thomson Reuters’ tally show EPS down 4.2% in Q4 with 6 of the 10 sectors recording declines..

image

So far, 21 S&P companies have reported their Q4 results and 76% have beaten by 4.7% combined. Twelve of these early reporters were in consumer-sensitive sectors and their beat rate was  67% with a 5.2% surprise factor.

TR calculates that 30 companies have positively pre-announced for Q4 vs 20 at the same time last year and 31 for all of Q3. Ninety-two companies negatively pre-announced, down from 100 last year and 94 in Q3.

Factset notes that the number of companies issuing negative EPS guidance in the Consumer Discretionary sector (25) is well above the 5-year average for the sector (15.9). The current record high is 22, which occurred in both Q1 2014 and Q2 2014. Thirteen of the 25 companies that have issued negative EPS guidance are in retail industries: Specialty Retail (8), Multiline Retail (3), and Internet & Catalog Retail (2). Five of the retail companies actually cited lower oil and gas prices as a negative impact on their businesses, specifically citing weaker economic conditions in regions reliant on the energy sector. The stronger U.S. dollar was cited by the highest number of companies (17 out of 25) in this sector as a negative contributor to earnings guidance for Q4. Fewer tourists and lower tourist spending are the perverse effect of a strong dollar on retailers.

image

Factset also note that, in total, the companies that have given EPS guidance for Q4 2015 have guided earnings 3.1% below the expectations of analysts on average. This percentage decline is much smaller than the 5-year average of -10.9%.

For all of 2015, negative guidance has been at the low end of the past 4-year experience.

image

In all, 2015 EPS are estimated at $117.16, down 1.4% YoY. This is per TR as Facset’s calculations show a 0.7% decline. Factset has done interesting and important dissections of the 2015 numbers:

USD impact: the dollar jumped 23% vs the euro, 15% vs the yen and 16% cs the CAD.

  • For companies that generate more than 50% of sales inside the U.S., the estimated earnings growth rate is 4.7%. For companies that generate less than 50% of sales inside the U.S., the estimated earnings decline is -7.7%.
  • The estimated sales decline for the S&P 500 for CY 2015 is -3.4%. For companies that generate more than 50% of sales inside the U.S., the estimated sales growth rate is 0.5%. For companies that generate less than 50% of sales inside the U.S., the estimated sales decline is -11.7%.

Oil impact: crude oil dropped 31% in 2015 (46% in Q4):

  • If the Energy sector is excluded, the estimated earnings growth rate for the S&P 500 would jump to 6.2% from -0.7%, and the estimated revenue growth rate for the S&P 500 would jump to 1.5% from -3.4%.

USD + Oil: When excluding the Energy sector and also analyzing the index by revenue exposure, the combined negative impact of the stronger U.S. dollar and lower oil and gas prices can be seen more clearly.

  • The estimated earnings growth rate for the S&P 500 (ex-Energy) for 2015 is 6.2%. For companies (ex-Energy) that generate more than 50% of sales inside the U.S., the estimated earnings growth rate is 10.2%. For companies (ex-Energy) that generate less than 50% of sales inside the U.S., the estimated earnings growth rate is 0.7%.
  • The estimated sales growth rate for the S&P 500 (ex-Energy) for 2015 is 1.5%. For companies (ex- Energy) that generate more than 50% of sales inside the U.S., the estimated sales growth rate is 4.0%. For companies (ex-Energy) that generate less than 50% of sales inside the U.S., the estimated sales decline is -4.6%.

image

Facset published a preview of 2016 with these salient points:

  • Industry analysts in aggregate are projecting record-level EPS in 2016 of $126.94. However, they have overestimated the final EPS for the index by 7.5% on average over the past 15 years.
  • However, this 7.5% average includes three years in which there were substantial differences between the bottom-up EPS estimate at the start of the year and the final EPS number: 2001 (+36.9%), 2008 (+37.8%), and 2009 (+29.0%). If these three years are excluded, the average difference between the bottom-up EPS estimate one year prior to the end of that year and the final EPS number for that year has only been +0.7% (over the past 15 years).

image

  • Industry analysts ($126.94) and market strategists ($126.88) had similar EPS estimates for 2016 on December 31. This marked the smallest spread between these EPS estimates at the start of a year in ten years. Over the past 10 years, the bottom-up EPS estimate has been 1.2% higher than the top down mean EPS estimate on average at the start of a year.
  • Industry analysts project earnings growth of 7.5% for the index in 2016. Nine sectors are predicted to see earnings growth, led by the Consumer Discretionary sector at +14.8%. The Energy sector (-9.8%) is the only sector predicted to see a decline in earnings. However, five sectors are expected to report earnings growth of less than 3% for 2016.
  • Industry analysts project revenue growth of 4.3% for the index in 2016. All ten sectors are predicted to see revenue growth, led by the Health Care sector.

The current correction is fairly similar to the August-September scare, also ignited by China-related fears. This is in spite of the fact that, according to Factset, companies in the S&P 500 in aggregate generate about 10% of sales from the Asia Pacific region, most of which comes from China and Japan. Amid all the turmoil, earnings matter.

The S&P 500 is selling at 16.4x trailing EPS of $117.16 (per TR) for 2015. The Rule of 20 P/E is now 18.3x, down 2 from its July peak, and at its lowest level since August 2013 after another China scare.

The next few weeks will be important as companies provide guidance for 2016 amid continued fears on China, oil and currently seemingly high inventories. For now, estimates are holding well with Q1 and Q2 EPS expected to rise 1.6% and 4.0% respectively. The serious problems continue to be concentrated in the commodity sensitive sectors.

The other risk to valuation is inflation which has risen from 1.5% to 2.0% during 2015 as per core CPI. Continued pressures on commodity prices and tame wage gains should contain inflation during the next 6 months. Recent PMI surveys suggest little inflation risk for the shorter term.

image

At 1919 on the S&P 500 Index, the upside to fair value (2110) is 10%. In my view, downside is to a Rule of 20 P/E of 16.3 or another 10% assuming continued investor angst and caution (Yielding to High Yield). It seems best to have a look at actual Q4 results and guidance before recommitting.

GOOD CHART

Too bad GS did not chart U.S. equities as well but the point is well taken nonetheless. Averaging these 3 PMIs reflect the inter-relationship between these economic areas and their impact on global trends. Their combined economic momentum clearly matters to equity markets.

image

For reference, here are the relevant PMI charts:

image

image

image

China (48.2) is dragging the average down but the U.S. PMI was down 1.6 to 51.2 in December, more than offsetting the Eurozone gain of 0.4 to 53.2. The December surveys revealed weak orders in the U.S. and in China which suggest that the January readings could remain weak.

Punch Davies: Global activity contradicts market pessimism

(…) So far, our regular monthly “nowcasts” of economic activity, which are updated in full here, have not picked up any decline in global growth, compared to the average recorded in recent quarters.

The overall growth rate in global activity is now running at roughly 3 per cent, which is actually slightly higher than than the growth rate recorded in 2015 Q3, the date of the previous global market scare. This conclusion is strengthened by the latest industrial production data, which show that the global IP growth rate has rebounded to about 2 per cent, compared to -2 per cent about a year ago.

The results for individual countries this month do not support widespread fears of a hard landing in China, but (surprisingly) they do identify a progressive slowdown in the US. This would become worrying for markets if it persisted into 2016 Q1, especially if it continued to be ignored by the Federal Reserve.

European growth remains robust (by its own tepid standards). In fact, the large gap in activity growth between the eurozone and the US is unusual, and is counter to the recent changes in monetary policy in the two blocs. This growth pattern needs to change in coming months if the Fed/ECB “divergence” in monetary policy is to take its expected course this year. (…)

But so far there is little sign of a recession starting, either in our “nowcasts”, or in hard data for industrial production and retail sales. (…)

That is not to say that downside risks have entirely disappeared. They have not. Global activity continues to grow at about half a percentage point below the long term trend, so spare capacity continues to rise. As has been the case throughout 2015, this applies particularly to the global industrial sector, which continues to grow two percentage points below trend. This is probably due to the impact of the oil shock on energy investment, and also to a significant drawdown in global inventories in the second half of 2015. Both of these effects may now have started to bottom out, which may explain the uptick in industrial data in recent months. (…)

Among the major economies, the gradual slowdown in US growth from 2.1 per cent last summer to only 1.5 per cent now is an aberration, and it runs counter to the Fed’s apparent determination to continue tightening monetary policy. The FOMC seems to view the recent slowdown as temporary, believing that it has been driven by inventory reductions and other short lived drags to the manufacturing sector from trade and energy investment.

The firm January employment report released on Friday supports the Fed’s optimistic view, and markets are unlikely to become too concerned about the US slowdown unless the labour market shows signs of weakness. That is certainly not happening yet. (…)

Finally, activity in the EMs has contradicted investor pessimism by actually improving a little in recent months. In aggregate, EM activity growth is now running at 4.5 per cent, compared to a low point of 3.5 per cent at the height of the China growth scare last September. Having said that, the growth rate in the EMs is still a full percentage point below the long term trend, so spare capacity continues to increase at a rapid rate, notably in the industrial sectors. Furthermore, downside risks from a rapid deleveraging of the credit bubble in the emerging world remain very worrying.

Pointing up Among individual economies, the China “nowcast” continues to defy market fears of a hard landing, suggesting that growth has rebounded by a percentage point in recent months to about 7 per cent. Many observers continue to regard Chinese economic data as fictitious, and the official estimates of the absolute level of the growth rate are clearly dubious. However, we can be fairly confident that the direction of change in the growth rate has been in the right direction, improving noticeably since last August. Hard landing risk for the economy as a whole has therefore diminished. (…)

Punch Ed Hyman: Halfway Through Current Expansion Cycle

Ed Hyman, Chairman of Evercore ISI, and rated the number one economist for 35 consecutive years by Institutional Investor, recently sat for Part One of a two part interview with Conseulo Mack of WealthTrack, which was aired a few days ago. Also participating in the interview was Dennis Stattman, the Portfolio Manager of Blackrock Global Allocation Fund. (…)

Uber to Drop Prices in 80 Cities in the U.S. and Canada Drivers will receive earning guarantees in affected cities. Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Houston will be among those seeing cuts.

Uber Technologies will drop prices in 80 North American cities starting on Saturday. The ride-hailing company hopes the move will increase demand in a seasonally slow month.

Uber said it will cut prices in Los Angeles and San Francisco by 10 percent, Houston by 20 percent, and Richmond, Virginia, by 15 percent. Prices in some cities, including New York and Chicago, will remain unchanged for now. Fare reductions will eventually be extended to 100 cities, the company said. “We believe in price cuts when demand slows down,” said Andrew Macdonald, a regional general manager for Uber. (…)

In January 2015, Uber dropped Seattle prices, but the demand didn’t increase enough to make up for the price cut. So Uber restored prices. “We’re a very experimental company; we don’t always know how a market is going to react,” Macdonald said. “Because of our commitment to roll back if it doesn’t work, by its nature, it’s somewhat temporary.”