The enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it’s the illusion of knowledge (Stephen Hawking)

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so (Mark Twain)

Invest with smart knowledge and objective odds

NEW$ & VIEW$ (11 AUGUST 2015): Hmmm…

Confused smile If, yesterday, like Evercore ISI’s Ed Hyman, you thought that the picture was getting “very complicated” with things such as “Fed tightening, China, PR default, S&P earnings, Brazil, Russia, the Middle East, and a Greek relapse”, you must be feeling pretty dizzy today:

Devalued Yuan Rattles Markets China’s central bank devalued its tightly controlled currency, causing its biggest one-day loss in two decades, as the world’s second-largest economy continues to sputter.

(…) The devaluation Tuesday was the most significant downward adjustment to the yuan since 1994, when as part of a break from Communist state planning, Beijing let the currency fall by one-third.

China sets a midpoint for the value of the yuan against the U.S. dollar. In daily trading, the yuan is allowed to move 2% above or below that midpoint, which is called the daily fixing. But the central bank sometimes ignores the daily moves, at times setting the fixing so that the yuan is stronger against the dollar a day after the market has indicated it should be weaker.

With Tuesday’s move, the fixing will now be based on how the yuan closes in the previous trading session. As a result, the yuan’s fixing was weakened by 1.9% Tuesday from the previous day, leaving it at 6.2298 to the U.S. dollar, compared with 6.1162 on Monday. The yuan dropped as much as 1.99% from its previous close to 6.3360 against the dollar in Shanghai and fell as much as 2.3% in Hong Kong in early trading.

The engineered fall in the yuan is likely to cause political ripples around the world. In particular it may reignite criticism of China’s tight control over the yuan’s exchange rate within the U.S. Congress and some American businesses, which have long said the currency was already too weak and set at a rate that allowed Chinese exporters to sell their goods artificially cheap on world markets.

As recently as April, other central bankers were speaking confidently that China wouldn’t devalue. This puts pressure on them to follow suit. China’s currency move also could pose a challenge for the U.S. Federal Reserve. The Fed is preparing to raise U.S. interest rates later this year. One source of concern for the Fed this year has been a strong U.S. dollar, which is squeezing exports and helping to hold U.S. inflation below the Fed’s 2% target. China’s move puts more upward pressure on the dollar, which could be exacerbated further when the Fed actually raises rates. (…)

This is a big deal. Described as a “market reform” move by the PBoC, this move de facto allows the market to set trends, at least if the PBoC is serious when it says this will enhance “the market-orientation and benchmark status” of the renminbi. From the FT:

Previously, the PBoC would set the currency wherever it liked. Now it will give markets a voice: the daily fix will “refer to the closing rate of the interbank foreign exchange market on the previous day”. (…)

The renminbi had been under pressure to weaken for months because of capital outflows but the PBoC restrained any depreciation by setting the fix higher and selling forex reserves. Today’s one-off depreciation eases some of that pressure.

(…) But we will not know if China is truly letting the market have a say in the currency’s value until we have seen it move in a direction that would not be supportive to its own goals.

The Chinese currency has a soft peg to the US dollar, which has surged this year and contributed to the decline in Chinese exports. A weaker renminbi could support the economy, so Beijing could simply be allowing the currency to slide and use the talk of “market reform” as political cover; otherwise it would be controversial for the currency to be devalued. (…)

Investors have been pushing for the renminbi to weaken and if they are allowed to determine where the fix is, it is possible the currency could depreciate quickly. (…)

Punch The reality is that China’s economy is weakening more than what Beijing thinks is safe from a social and political standpoint. China’s exports have been crushed by global sluggishness AND global devaluations while domestic demand is not accelerating enough to support manufacturing. The collapse in the equity market has been seen as a further threat to social peace (confidence and support of the party). The way officials handled that revealed Beijing’s nervousness.

Now they cleverly enter the devaluation game, adding fuel to the global deflationary trends just when all central banks are trying to restart inflation.

Ghost Back in 1987, when the world realized that world central bankers were getting into a free for all, equities also devalued.

Asia faces round of currency wars

(…) “The more market is allowed to play a part in China, the more sensitive Asian currencies will be to moves there,” said Mitul Kotecha, head of Asia currency and rates strategy at Barclays. “In the past both China’s equity and forex markets have had only a limited impact.” (…)

From Macquarie Securities:

In the past, one major problem with the yuan exchange rate setting was too much emphasis on its stability against the U.S. dollar while neglecting [trends in] other currencies. In the past 12 months, the yuan appreciated by 23% against the euro and 17% against the yen. As a result, so far this year, China’s exports to the EU and Japan are down 4% and 11% year on year. Today’s change should mitigate the problem.

NFIB: Small-Business Optimism Rebounds in July Small-business owners’ confidence about their economic situation rebounded modestly in July, according to a report released Tuesday.

After a sharp and unexpected decline in June, The National Federation of Independent Business’s small-business optimism index rose 1.3 points, to 95.4, in July.

image

Seven of the 10 subindexes increased in July.

Expectations for better business conditions, plans to add inventories and plans to create jobs were among the biggest contributors to the uptick. Those expecting better conditions over the next six months rose five percentage points, though the subindex was still in negative territory, and the subindex reflecting plans to build inventories rose four percentage points to the flat line.

The job-creation subindex rose three percentage points, to 12%. The report said job-market indicators “held their respectable historic solid positions,” though it added that “there were no signs of a second half ‘liftoff’ that many are forecasting.” (…)

From the report:

  • Earnings trends continued to deteriorate, posting a 2 point decline after a 10 point drop in June, falling to a negative 19 percent. Far more owners reporting profits lower quarter to quarter than higher.
  • Reports of increased labor compensation rose 2 points to a net 23 percent of all owners (seasonally adjusted), still shy of the high of 25 percent for this year. Labor costs will continue to put pressure on the bottom line.
  • Seasonally adjusted, the net percent of owners raising selling prices was 5 percent, unchanged. There are no signs of inflation bubbling up on Main Street, should be good news, but maybe not for the Fed.

image

image

image

OPEC Pumps at Three-Year High Despite Oversupply The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries said the group’s production rose to its highest level in over three years, despite global oversupply that has helped send prices tumbling.

In its monthly oil market report, the 12-nation cartel of some of the world’s biggest oil producers said its members pumped 31.51 million barrels a day in July—its highest level since May 2012, representing an increase of 101,000 barrels a day, compared with the previous month. That is 1.5 million barrels a day above the group’s stated output ceiling of 30 million barrels a day, which OPEC endorsed at its last gathering in June in Vienna.

In Iraq, OPEC said output rose by 46,700 barrels a day in July and broke a record at 4.07 million barrels a day. In Saudi Arabia, the other main driver in OPEC’s production growth, crude output rose by 39,200 barrels a day, to 10.35 million barrels a day, amid strong domestic demand in the summer season. Angola also increased its production by 39,700 barrels a day, to 1.78 million barrels a day.

U.S. production, meanwhile, has proved stubbornly resilient. OPEC said Tuesday that U.S. production fell by 260,000 barrels a day in May, but the group said it still sees it rising this year by nearly a million barrels a day and another 320,000 barrels a day in 2016.

“U.S. production remains near the highest level in four decades, although the commodity price is telling the U.S. shale sector to shrink,” the group said. The higher output is largely due to increased cost efficiencies, lower taxes and existing projects coming on stream, OPEC said. The group said that, for example, in the prolific North Dakota, many projects can still be profitable at $24 to $41 a barrel.

OPEC said global oil demand is expected to grow by 1.38 million barrels a day this year, some 90,000 barrels a day more than it previously expected. Despite that higher demand, OPEC said oversupply stood at 2.87 million barrels a day in the second quarter.

Russia’s Economic Contraction Deepens

Gross domestic product shrank by 4.6% in the second quarter compared with a year earlier, after falling by 2.2% in the first three months of the year, preliminary data from the Federal Statistics Service showed Monday.

From the FT:

With oil prices back down to $50 a barrel for Brent crude, a falling gas price and its share of the European energy market declining, the Russian economy is in real trouble. The situation is dangerous because the problems cannot easily be corrected. The risk is that the economic problems could lead to political instability both within Russia and around its borders. (…)

Most of Vladimir Putin’s 15-year reign (as president and as prime minister) has coincided with strong energy prices and growing production of oil and gas. The resulting revenue has enabled the Kremlin to keep most people happy – businessmen, the military, the middle class of Moscow and St Petersburg and even most of the wider population. But the sun never shines for ever. Too little has been done to prepare for the current downturn. The Russian economy has not been diversified and although there is a reserve fund that can provide some cushion against the fall in revenue the amounts involved are small and will soon run out if current prices persist.

As reported in the FT last week, Gazprom is set to produce less gas this year than at any time since the fall of the Soviet Union.” The company’s market share is falling and according to analysts at Sberbank its revenue, year on year, is expected to drop by almost 30 per cent this year.”

Gas-to-gas competition fed by the increased flows of liquified gas (LNG) has broken the traditional link between gas and oil prices and is changing the structure of a market the Russians had taken for granted. After years of cozy interdependence with the European utilities, the company’s trading activities are under sustained attack by the competition authorities in Brussels.

The oil story is no better. Russia exports about 6m barrels a day (mbd) but each one is now worth only 40 per cent of the revenue achieved two years ago. After a small surge in the spring, the world oil price has now fallen back to $50 a barrel. (…)

At the same time, fears about the future of the Russian economy are encouraging a dramatic outflow of capital. Many of those who have done well in the last decade fear that in hard times Mr Putin could expropriate assets in order to keep things going. According to some estimates, the exodus of capital since the latest phase of the Ukrainian crisis began in November 2013 could amount to $300bn by the end of this year. Some physical assets cannot be moved but cash and wealth in other forms certainly can. No one is doing more for London estate agents at the moment than Vladimir Putin.

The situation is dangerous because the options for the Russian government are so limited. The oil and gas markets are being shaped by forces that neither Mr Putin nor anyone else can control. The downward cycle could take years to play out. The dispute over Ukraine is an obstacle that could be removed but even a complete and amicable settlement there would not restore Gazprom’s market share in western Europe. The deals to sell gas from east Siberia to China and others make sense but will not make money for another decade.

The real risk is that economic discontent will force either the existing Russian government or its replacement into a harder political stance. As the maps in Barnes’s book show Russia has spent most of its history in conflict with one neighbour or another. War, as on numerous past occasions, could provide a nationalistic distraction from the grim economic realities. In many ways, the last 25 years in Russia have been a period of relative stability. But there is no guarantee that that situation will last. Mr Putin will remember all too well that one of the major reasons for the fall of the Soviet Union at the end of the 1980s was the collapse in energy prices. If anything, Russia is weaker now than it was then. Indeed, as Dominic Lieven says in a brilliant introduction to Barnes’s book: “Russia is now weaker than it has been at almost any time in the last 300 years.

NEW$ & VIEW$ (10 AUGUST 2015): Fed Up or Not? U.S. Economy Sluggish; Oil; Earnings Problem!

July Job Numbers Keep Fed on Track For Rate Increase Friday’s jobs numbers were in line with the Federal Reserve’s narrative for how the economy is developing—solid job growth and diminished slack in labor markets but no sign of wage or inflation pressure—keeping a September rate increase a possibility, writes Jon Hilsenrath.

In speeches and official statements, Fed officials have described hiring as solid and have said the unemployment rate is evidence that slack in the labor market has declined and will eventually lead to an acceleration in wage and price gains.

The employment report released Friday, which was in line with market expectations and with the trend of recent months, likely won’t change those assessments.

The gain of 215,000 jobs in July was close to average monthly payroll employment growth so far this year[211,000]. Average hourly earnings of workers, up 2.1% from a year earlier, show no sign of wage acceleration.

The jobless rate at 5.3% in July was where Fed officials forecast it will be by year-end and is down from 6.2% a year ago. A broader measure of unemployment, which includes discouraged workers and people working part-time jobs who want full-time jobs, fell further to 10.4% from 10.5% in June and is down nearly two percentage points from a year earlier. (…)

Meantime, the Fed said in its July policy statement it wanted to see “some” further progress in labor markets before raising rates. The jobs report Friday, by keeping to the trend the Fed describes as solid, clearly fell within the realm of some further progress.

The bigger question officials will need to debate in September is whether such improvement is enough to give them confidence that inflation will eventually begin rising toward the central bank’s 2% objective. Inflation, by the Fed’s preferred measure, has run below that target for 38 straight months. (…)

The Treasury market illustrates just how blurry the picture for rate increases is. While the yield on the two-year note has risen to 0.72% from 0.43% over the past year as the possibility of Fed rate increases fell into its range, it still is low. Meanwhile, the yield on the 10-year note has fallen to 2.18% from 2.41% over the same period. This shows investors expect average overnight rates over the next decade will remain depressed.

The bond-market view then is that the Fed will struggle to reach its 2% inflation target in the years ahead. Weakness in overseas economies, which are helping drive a decline in commodity and goods prices, and a stronger dollar are part of that. So, too, are limited wage gains. A flatter yield curve also gives banks less incentive to take on more lending risk, which also damps growth. (…)

NBF:

So, the July gains clearly extended the series of “solid” job gains as described by the Fed recently. Wage inflation remains low, although that’s unlikely to matter much at the Fed considering that its staff recently released a paper that found little to no evidence that changes in labour costs have a material effect on price inflation (Peneva/Rudd, May 2015). All told, odds are growing that the Fed will start its tightening cycle as early as September when it will also present upgraded GDP growth forecasts for this year.

image

Aggregate Income Boost a Good Sign for 2H Spending

From an aggregate income perspective, the jobs report was solid. The one-tenth increase in the average workweek to 34.6 hours from 34.5 in June lifted total worker-hours (aggregate hours) by 0.5 percent compared to 0.2 percent previously. Combined with the two-tenths increase in average hourly earnings,

aggregate income increased by 0.7 percent in the month, compared to 0.2 percent in June.

This is the fastest monthly increase since January. As a result, the year-on-year pace of growth rose to 4.9 percent from 4.4 percent previously. This was the fastest pace since March, when it was also 4.9 percent. This is a critical development for the near-term outlook for consumer spending, since it suggests that wage and salary income is also due to accelerate.

Fed’s Labor Market Conditions Index Follows Jobs Data

The Federal Reserve Board releases its July Labor Market Conditions Index (LMCI). In July, jobless claims remained around 275,000 and the Conference Board’s consumer confidence survey reported some deterioration in the “Jobs Plentiful” and “Jobs Hard to Get” sub-indexes, but that may have been influenced by recent negative headlines rather than a more lasting shift in labor conditions. Most of the 19 indicators summarized in the LMCI were released with the monthly employment report. The rate of change in LMCI held roughly steady in June.

U.S. Consumer Credit Picks Up in June Americans took on consumer debt at a faster pace in June, suggesting a firming labor market and low gas prices may finally be prying open consumers’ wallets.

Outstanding consumer credit, a reflection of nonmortgage debt, rose $20.74 billion or at a 7.3% annual rate in June, the Federal Reserve said Friday. That’s a slight increase from May, when it increased at an upwardly revised annual rate of 5.9%, but less than April’s 7.6% pace.

Revolving credit, mostly credit cards, rose at a 7.4% annual rate, a jump from May when it rose at an annual rate of 2.1%.

Nonrevolving credit, made up largely of auto and student loans, rose at a 7.3% annual rate, a slight acceleration from May’s upwardly revised rate of 7.2% and April’s unrevised 6.2% growth pace.

REAL TIME STATS

The most timely data from the American Association of Railroads.

The only good thing to say about the 6.5% (95,295 carloads) decline in total U.S. rail carloads in July 2015 from July 2014 is that it’s better than the 9.5% decline in May 2015 and the 7.7% decline in June. Carloads totaled 1,376,411 in July 2015, an average of 275,282 per week. That’s the lowest weekly average for July since 2009 — since 1988 (when our records begin), only July 2009 and July 1989 had a lower weekly average.

High five Railroads are overexposed, relative to the economy in general, to the energy sector. Coal is most of it, of course, but there’s also oil and gas. Some of the recent declines in steel-related rail carloads (primary metal products, iron ore, iron and steel scrap) is undoubtedly due to a decline in the steel needs of the energy sector (for example, fewer pipes for new wells, since fewer new wells are being drilled). Ditto with frac sand, a big part of the crushed stone, sand, and gravel rail category.

And crude oil, of course, which is around half of the petroleum and petroleum products category. Put another way, because changes in the energy sector are
having a bigger negative effect on rail traffic than they are on the economy as a whole, declines in rail carloads in recent months are not necessarily reflective of fundamental weakness in the broader economy.

Yes. But other economy-sensitive categories are not doing well. In fact, many were doing worse in Q2 than during Q1 and worse in July than during previous months.

U.S. carloads excluding coal and grain were down 3.9% (31,697 carloads) in July 2015 from July 2014, their fifth straight year-over-year monthly decline.

 image image

 image image

Meanwhile, China is slow and slower:

China Exports, Imports Drop in July Exports slid 8.3% from a year earlier, imports also down 8.1%

Exports slid 8.3% in the month from a year earlier, reversing a gain of 2.8% in June, customs data released Saturday showed. Imports fell for the ninth month in a row, dropping 8.1% in July from a year earlier, after a decline of 6.1% in June.

Exports for the first seven months of the year were down 0.8% in dollar terms compared with a year ago, while imports were down 14.6% over the same period.

While there were some bright spots in the trade picture, as imports of some key commodities made gains in volume terms, the figures were generally worse than expected and pointed to problems ahead on the already struggling export side.

“We could see relatively strong downward pressure on exports in the third quarter,” Customs said in a statement accompanying the data. (…)

Adding to the problems for exporters is the relatively strong Chinese currency, which has held steady against a buoyant dollar. That has carried the yuan more than 10% higher against the euro, providing a drag on exports to some key European markets.

Exports to the European Union fell 12% in July from a year ago, while those to Japan dropped 13%, and exports to the U.S. were down 1.35%. (…)

Industrial Production Slumps in Eurozone’s Heartland

Industrial production fell in the eurozone’s three largest economies in June, a sign that economic activity in the region failed to gain much momentum in the second quarter.

The drop was most severe in Germany, the region’s industrial powerhouse, where output, adjusted for calendar effects and seasonal swings, slumped 1.4% from May, data from the economics ministry showed Friday.

Industrial production dropped by 1.1% on the month in Italy and slipped by 0.1% in France, highlighting a diverging trend between the eurozone’s core and its southwestern periphery.

Industrial production in Spain, which accounts for roughly one-tenth of eurozone gross domestic product, rose 0.4% in June from the previous month, the INE statistics institute said Friday, another sign that Spain remains one of the fastest-growing economies in the region.

But disappointing health checks in Germany, France and Italy point to weak eurozone industrial production in June, economists said, as the big three economies account for roughly 60% of eurozone GDP.

“Together, the national figures suggests that eurozone industrial production in June probably declined by about 0.5% from May,” said Jonathan Loynes, chief European economist at Capital Economics. (…)

OIL
Oil Futures Signal Weak Prices Could Last Years The oil market indicates that prices could stay lower for longer, delivering a fresh blow to hard-hit energy exploration-and-production companies.

(…) On Friday, front-month oil prices fell 79 cents, or 1.8%, to $43.87 a barrel, while futures for delivery in December 2016 settled at $51.88 a barrel. The most expensive benchmark oil-futures contracts, which were dated for delivery in 2022 and 2023, settled at $63.26 a barrel.

For many producers, such as Diamondback Energy Inc. and Marathon Oil Corp., later-dated contracts are now too cheap to justify locking in prices. That means producers are likely to enter 2016 with fewer price hedges on the books than usual, if they have any at all.

Companies without price protection in 2016 could be forced to cut back further on new drilling if prices remain below their break-even costs. (…)

If the forecast prices indicated by the futures market turn out to be correct, 10 of the largest U.S. independent producers will outspend their cash flow by $11.4 billion next year, according to investment bank Tudor, Pickering, Holt & Co. (…)

High five Still, long-dated futures are typically a poor indicator of where prices are headed. (…)

Oil Prices Fall on New Drilling Prices fall to multimonth lows as U.S. drilling continues to rise

Oil-field services firm Baker Hughes Inc. said Friday that the number of rigs drilling for oil in the U.S. rose for the third straight week. Though there are still 58% fewer rigs operating compared with October 2014, the recent rise in rigs sparked concerns that a glut will continue to weigh on the market.

High five Nonetheless:

U.S. OIL PRODUCTION DROPPING

With respect to oil, the AAR published stats on crude oil traffic through Q2’15:

imageA different source of rail traffic data, available quarterly with a delay of up to a couple months, covers U.S. Class I railroads, including the U.S. operations of the two major Canadian railroads. This source includes data on rail carloads of crude oil and industrial sand.

U.S. Class I railroads originated 111,068 carloads of crude oil in the second quarter of 2015, down 2,021 carloads (1.8%) from the first quarter of 2015 and down 21,189 carloads (16.0%) from the third quarter of 2014, which is the peak quarter for rail crude oil originations.

Our best estimate is that the average rail carload of crude oil today contains approximately 682 barrels (somewhat more in North Dakota, somewhat less elsewhere). Using 682 barrels, the 111,068 carloads originated by U.S. Class I railroads in Q2 2015 was around 830,000 barrels per day.

YoY, the drop in Q2 crude oil traffic was 18.4%, confirming that U.S. shale oil production entered a downtrend during Q2 which seemed to intensify in July given that carloads of crude oil and other petroleum products sank 13.6% YoY after -7.3% in June, +0.5% in May and -1.1% in April.

Weekly average carloads in July 2015 were 13,582, the lowest since October 2013.

Note: the most recent EIA data, which everybody follows, is for May…(see the OIL segment in my July 30th NEW$ & VIEW$)

EARNINGS WATCH

Factset:

With 87% of the companies in the S&P 500 reporting actual results for Q2 to date, the percentage of companies reporting actual EPS above estimates (73%) is equal to the 5-year average, while the percentage of companies reporting actual sales above estimates (51%) is below the 5-year average.

Due to companies beating earnings estimates in aggregate, the blended (combines actual results for companies that have reported and estimated results for companies yet to report) earnings decline for Q2 2015 is now -1.0%. This is a smaller decline than the estimate of- 4.6% at the end of the second quarter (June 30).

If the Energy sector is excluded, the blended earnings growth rate for the S&P 500 would jump to 5.7% from -1.0%.

In aggregate, companies are reporting earnings that are 4.5% above expectations. This surprise percentage is equal to the 1-year (+4.5%) average, but below the 5-year (+5.0%) average.

Due to companies beating revenue estimates in aggregate, the blended revenue decline for Q2 2015 is now -3.3%. This is also a smaller decline than the estimate of -4.4% at the end of the second quarter (June 30).

In aggregate, companies are reporting sales that are 0.9% above expectations. This surprise percentage is equal to the 1-year (+0.9%) average, but above the 5-year (+0.7%) average.

If the Energy sector is excluded, the blended revenue growth rate for the S&P 500 would jump to 1.6% from -3.3%.

At this point in time, 78 companies in the index have issued EPS guidance for Q3 2015. Of these 78 companies, 56 have issued negative EPS guidance and 22 have issued positive EPS guidance. Thus, the percentage of companies issuing negative EPS guidance to date for the third quarter is 72%. This percentage is slightly above the 5-year average of 70%.

image

image

Pointing up HOUSTON, WE HAVE AN EARNINGS PROBLEM!

Q2 earnings look good, on the surface. Last week (BAD BREADTH EQUITIES), I alerted to the fact that a deeper analysis revealed that

this is clearly a two-tiered equity market: even ex-Energy, 60% of companies are growing with a median growth rate of 16.5% while the other 40% are suffering a median 12.5% earnings decline. (…)

Adding Energy companies back in the matrix, we find that 57% of the companies having reported so far show growth in EPS with a median growth rate of 16.5%. The other 43% with declining EPS have a median decline of 15.2%. Given the recent slide in oil prices, looking at equities excluding Energy stocks may no longer be appropriate as the “temporary price drop” looks less and less temporary.

This is not a so-so equity market with so-so earnings. This is more like a twin engine vehicle, one engine pulling forward and one going backward. The resulting standstill gives a false impression that overall things, though admittedly not great, are nonetheless OK.

Averages can sometimes be deceiving, hiding opposite trends which mathematically average into something close to normality. Here’s where the trouble is:

1- With nearly 90% of companies having reported Q2, only 55% of the companies have positive YoY EPS growth.

2- S&P’s index methodology is resulting in Q2 operating EPS actually dropping 9.9% YoY to $26.45. This figure was $28.46 on July 30th. We lost $2.00 last week only. I checked with S&P’s Howard Silverblatt who confirmed this was not a typo. Surprises turned bad by the end of the season and many late reporters showed pretty poor results. Howard pointed out 4 Energy companies which subtracted $0.88 to the Index EPS during the last week. I am doing further work on this to be released later this week.

This is important given that trailing EPS are now $108.61, down 2.6% from the previous quarter (and down 5.1% from their Q3’14 peak of $114.51). Furthermore. the earnings base has shrunk suddenly, jeopardizing future earnings if recent conditions were to persist.

image
Ghost The Dow Is Close to Reaching the Dreaded Death Cross A six-day decline in the Dow Jones Industrial Average is wreaking havoc on the gauge’s price chart, spurring a pattern of congestion in its moving averages that is despised by momentum traders.

(…) More than 100 percent of this year’s increase in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index is attributable to just two sectors. That’s the tightest clustering for an advancing year since 2000, Bloomberg data show. (…)

Wall Street now thinks Fed hike in September will be 2015’s only move: Reuters poll

NEW YORK – Top Wall Street banks still expect the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates in September, but a growing number now believe the central bank is likely to only hike once this year, a Reuters poll found on Friday.

Thirteen of 19 primary dealers, or the banks that deal directly with the Fed, polled said they expect the Fed to raise rates by September but just nine now believe the Fed will hike rates twice in 2015, compared with 15 of 20 in the July Reuters poll.

The median expectation for where the federal funds rate will end the year was 0.5 percent and 1.5 percent for 2016.

Gross Sees Global Economy Dangerously Close to Deflation

Gross pointed to how the CRB Commodity Index isn’t just at a cyclical low, but lower than in 2008 when Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. went bankrupt.

The commodity markets tell a truer story of what is happening in the economy because they are subject to real-time supply and demand, Gross said. Oil, metals and crops have plunged as China’s economy has decelerated and gluts in multiple markets have further depressed prices.

Nonetheless:

Janus’s Bill Gross Confident Fed Will Raise Rates in September

“September is the number for sure,” Gross said Friday in a Bloomberg Radio interview with Tom Keene. “The Fed really wants to get off the dime.”

The Fed is “mentally committed to moving before year end,” Gross said, despite the Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee this week voting 8-1 to keep its key rate at a record low and talking about changing policy next year.