The enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it’s the illusion of knowledge (Stephen Hawking)

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so (Mark Twain)

Invest with smart knowledge and objective odds

NEW$ & VIEW$ (10 AUGUST 2015): Fed Up or Not? U.S. Economy Sluggish; Oil; Earnings Problem!

July Job Numbers Keep Fed on Track For Rate Increase Friday’s jobs numbers were in line with the Federal Reserve’s narrative for how the economy is developing—solid job growth and diminished slack in labor markets but no sign of wage or inflation pressure—keeping a September rate increase a possibility, writes Jon Hilsenrath.

In speeches and official statements, Fed officials have described hiring as solid and have said the unemployment rate is evidence that slack in the labor market has declined and will eventually lead to an acceleration in wage and price gains.

The employment report released Friday, which was in line with market expectations and with the trend of recent months, likely won’t change those assessments.

The gain of 215,000 jobs in July was close to average monthly payroll employment growth so far this year[211,000]. Average hourly earnings of workers, up 2.1% from a year earlier, show no sign of wage acceleration.

The jobless rate at 5.3% in July was where Fed officials forecast it will be by year-end and is down from 6.2% a year ago. A broader measure of unemployment, which includes discouraged workers and people working part-time jobs who want full-time jobs, fell further to 10.4% from 10.5% in June and is down nearly two percentage points from a year earlier. (…)

Meantime, the Fed said in its July policy statement it wanted to see “some” further progress in labor markets before raising rates. The jobs report Friday, by keeping to the trend the Fed describes as solid, clearly fell within the realm of some further progress.

The bigger question officials will need to debate in September is whether such improvement is enough to give them confidence that inflation will eventually begin rising toward the central bank’s 2% objective. Inflation, by the Fed’s preferred measure, has run below that target for 38 straight months. (…)

The Treasury market illustrates just how blurry the picture for rate increases is. While the yield on the two-year note has risen to 0.72% from 0.43% over the past year as the possibility of Fed rate increases fell into its range, it still is low. Meanwhile, the yield on the 10-year note has fallen to 2.18% from 2.41% over the same period. This shows investors expect average overnight rates over the next decade will remain depressed.

The bond-market view then is that the Fed will struggle to reach its 2% inflation target in the years ahead. Weakness in overseas economies, which are helping drive a decline in commodity and goods prices, and a stronger dollar are part of that. So, too, are limited wage gains. A flatter yield curve also gives banks less incentive to take on more lending risk, which also damps growth. (…)

NBF:

So, the July gains clearly extended the series of “solid” job gains as described by the Fed recently. Wage inflation remains low, although that’s unlikely to matter much at the Fed considering that its staff recently released a paper that found little to no evidence that changes in labour costs have a material effect on price inflation (Peneva/Rudd, May 2015). All told, odds are growing that the Fed will start its tightening cycle as early as September when it will also present upgraded GDP growth forecasts for this year.

image

Aggregate Income Boost a Good Sign for 2H Spending

From an aggregate income perspective, the jobs report was solid. The one-tenth increase in the average workweek to 34.6 hours from 34.5 in June lifted total worker-hours (aggregate hours) by 0.5 percent compared to 0.2 percent previously. Combined with the two-tenths increase in average hourly earnings,

aggregate income increased by 0.7 percent in the month, compared to 0.2 percent in June.

This is the fastest monthly increase since January. As a result, the year-on-year pace of growth rose to 4.9 percent from 4.4 percent previously. This was the fastest pace since March, when it was also 4.9 percent. This is a critical development for the near-term outlook for consumer spending, since it suggests that wage and salary income is also due to accelerate.

Fed’s Labor Market Conditions Index Follows Jobs Data

The Federal Reserve Board releases its July Labor Market Conditions Index (LMCI). In July, jobless claims remained around 275,000 and the Conference Board’s consumer confidence survey reported some deterioration in the “Jobs Plentiful” and “Jobs Hard to Get” sub-indexes, but that may have been influenced by recent negative headlines rather than a more lasting shift in labor conditions. Most of the 19 indicators summarized in the LMCI were released with the monthly employment report. The rate of change in LMCI held roughly steady in June.

U.S. Consumer Credit Picks Up in June Americans took on consumer debt at a faster pace in June, suggesting a firming labor market and low gas prices may finally be prying open consumers’ wallets.

Outstanding consumer credit, a reflection of nonmortgage debt, rose $20.74 billion or at a 7.3% annual rate in June, the Federal Reserve said Friday. That’s a slight increase from May, when it increased at an upwardly revised annual rate of 5.9%, but less than April’s 7.6% pace.

Revolving credit, mostly credit cards, rose at a 7.4% annual rate, a jump from May when it rose at an annual rate of 2.1%.

Nonrevolving credit, made up largely of auto and student loans, rose at a 7.3% annual rate, a slight acceleration from May’s upwardly revised rate of 7.2% and April’s unrevised 6.2% growth pace.

REAL TIME STATS

The most timely data from the American Association of Railroads.

The only good thing to say about the 6.5% (95,295 carloads) decline in total U.S. rail carloads in July 2015 from July 2014 is that it’s better than the 9.5% decline in May 2015 and the 7.7% decline in June. Carloads totaled 1,376,411 in July 2015, an average of 275,282 per week. That’s the lowest weekly average for July since 2009 — since 1988 (when our records begin), only July 2009 and July 1989 had a lower weekly average.

High five Railroads are overexposed, relative to the economy in general, to the energy sector. Coal is most of it, of course, but there’s also oil and gas. Some of the recent declines in steel-related rail carloads (primary metal products, iron ore, iron and steel scrap) is undoubtedly due to a decline in the steel needs of the energy sector (for example, fewer pipes for new wells, since fewer new wells are being drilled). Ditto with frac sand, a big part of the crushed stone, sand, and gravel rail category.

And crude oil, of course, which is around half of the petroleum and petroleum products category. Put another way, because changes in the energy sector are
having a bigger negative effect on rail traffic than they are on the economy as a whole, declines in rail carloads in recent months are not necessarily reflective of fundamental weakness in the broader economy.

Yes. But other economy-sensitive categories are not doing well. In fact, many were doing worse in Q2 than during Q1 and worse in July than during previous months.

U.S. carloads excluding coal and grain were down 3.9% (31,697 carloads) in July 2015 from July 2014, their fifth straight year-over-year monthly decline.

 image image

 image image

Meanwhile, China is slow and slower:

China Exports, Imports Drop in July Exports slid 8.3% from a year earlier, imports also down 8.1%

Exports slid 8.3% in the month from a year earlier, reversing a gain of 2.8% in June, customs data released Saturday showed. Imports fell for the ninth month in a row, dropping 8.1% in July from a year earlier, after a decline of 6.1% in June.

Exports for the first seven months of the year were down 0.8% in dollar terms compared with a year ago, while imports were down 14.6% over the same period.

While there were some bright spots in the trade picture, as imports of some key commodities made gains in volume terms, the figures were generally worse than expected and pointed to problems ahead on the already struggling export side.

“We could see relatively strong downward pressure on exports in the third quarter,” Customs said in a statement accompanying the data. (…)

Adding to the problems for exporters is the relatively strong Chinese currency, which has held steady against a buoyant dollar. That has carried the yuan more than 10% higher against the euro, providing a drag on exports to some key European markets.

Exports to the European Union fell 12% in July from a year ago, while those to Japan dropped 13%, and exports to the U.S. were down 1.35%. (…)

Industrial Production Slumps in Eurozone’s Heartland

Industrial production fell in the eurozone’s three largest economies in June, a sign that economic activity in the region failed to gain much momentum in the second quarter.

The drop was most severe in Germany, the region’s industrial powerhouse, where output, adjusted for calendar effects and seasonal swings, slumped 1.4% from May, data from the economics ministry showed Friday.

Industrial production dropped by 1.1% on the month in Italy and slipped by 0.1% in France, highlighting a diverging trend between the eurozone’s core and its southwestern periphery.

Industrial production in Spain, which accounts for roughly one-tenth of eurozone gross domestic product, rose 0.4% in June from the previous month, the INE statistics institute said Friday, another sign that Spain remains one of the fastest-growing economies in the region.

But disappointing health checks in Germany, France and Italy point to weak eurozone industrial production in June, economists said, as the big three economies account for roughly 60% of eurozone GDP.

“Together, the national figures suggests that eurozone industrial production in June probably declined by about 0.5% from May,” said Jonathan Loynes, chief European economist at Capital Economics. (…)

OIL
Oil Futures Signal Weak Prices Could Last Years The oil market indicates that prices could stay lower for longer, delivering a fresh blow to hard-hit energy exploration-and-production companies.

(…) On Friday, front-month oil prices fell 79 cents, or 1.8%, to $43.87 a barrel, while futures for delivery in December 2016 settled at $51.88 a barrel. The most expensive benchmark oil-futures contracts, which were dated for delivery in 2022 and 2023, settled at $63.26 a barrel.

For many producers, such as Diamondback Energy Inc. and Marathon Oil Corp., later-dated contracts are now too cheap to justify locking in prices. That means producers are likely to enter 2016 with fewer price hedges on the books than usual, if they have any at all.

Companies without price protection in 2016 could be forced to cut back further on new drilling if prices remain below their break-even costs. (…)

If the forecast prices indicated by the futures market turn out to be correct, 10 of the largest U.S. independent producers will outspend their cash flow by $11.4 billion next year, according to investment bank Tudor, Pickering, Holt & Co. (…)

High five Still, long-dated futures are typically a poor indicator of where prices are headed. (…)

Oil Prices Fall on New Drilling Prices fall to multimonth lows as U.S. drilling continues to rise

Oil-field services firm Baker Hughes Inc. said Friday that the number of rigs drilling for oil in the U.S. rose for the third straight week. Though there are still 58% fewer rigs operating compared with October 2014, the recent rise in rigs sparked concerns that a glut will continue to weigh on the market.

High five Nonetheless:

U.S. OIL PRODUCTION DROPPING

With respect to oil, the AAR published stats on crude oil traffic through Q2’15:

imageA different source of rail traffic data, available quarterly with a delay of up to a couple months, covers U.S. Class I railroads, including the U.S. operations of the two major Canadian railroads. This source includes data on rail carloads of crude oil and industrial sand.

U.S. Class I railroads originated 111,068 carloads of crude oil in the second quarter of 2015, down 2,021 carloads (1.8%) from the first quarter of 2015 and down 21,189 carloads (16.0%) from the third quarter of 2014, which is the peak quarter for rail crude oil originations.

Our best estimate is that the average rail carload of crude oil today contains approximately 682 barrels (somewhat more in North Dakota, somewhat less elsewhere). Using 682 barrels, the 111,068 carloads originated by U.S. Class I railroads in Q2 2015 was around 830,000 barrels per day.

YoY, the drop in Q2 crude oil traffic was 18.4%, confirming that U.S. shale oil production entered a downtrend during Q2 which seemed to intensify in July given that carloads of crude oil and other petroleum products sank 13.6% YoY after -7.3% in June, +0.5% in May and -1.1% in April.

Weekly average carloads in July 2015 were 13,582, the lowest since October 2013.

Note: the most recent EIA data, which everybody follows, is for May…(see the OIL segment in my July 30th NEW$ & VIEW$)

EARNINGS WATCH

Factset:

With 87% of the companies in the S&P 500 reporting actual results for Q2 to date, the percentage of companies reporting actual EPS above estimates (73%) is equal to the 5-year average, while the percentage of companies reporting actual sales above estimates (51%) is below the 5-year average.

Due to companies beating earnings estimates in aggregate, the blended (combines actual results for companies that have reported and estimated results for companies yet to report) earnings decline for Q2 2015 is now -1.0%. This is a smaller decline than the estimate of- 4.6% at the end of the second quarter (June 30).

If the Energy sector is excluded, the blended earnings growth rate for the S&P 500 would jump to 5.7% from -1.0%.

In aggregate, companies are reporting earnings that are 4.5% above expectations. This surprise percentage is equal to the 1-year (+4.5%) average, but below the 5-year (+5.0%) average.

Due to companies beating revenue estimates in aggregate, the blended revenue decline for Q2 2015 is now -3.3%. This is also a smaller decline than the estimate of -4.4% at the end of the second quarter (June 30).

In aggregate, companies are reporting sales that are 0.9% above expectations. This surprise percentage is equal to the 1-year (+0.9%) average, but above the 5-year (+0.7%) average.

If the Energy sector is excluded, the blended revenue growth rate for the S&P 500 would jump to 1.6% from -3.3%.

At this point in time, 78 companies in the index have issued EPS guidance for Q3 2015. Of these 78 companies, 56 have issued negative EPS guidance and 22 have issued positive EPS guidance. Thus, the percentage of companies issuing negative EPS guidance to date for the third quarter is 72%. This percentage is slightly above the 5-year average of 70%.

image

image

Pointing up HOUSTON, WE HAVE AN EARNINGS PROBLEM!

Q2 earnings look good, on the surface. Last week (BAD BREADTH EQUITIES), I alerted to the fact that a deeper analysis revealed that

this is clearly a two-tiered equity market: even ex-Energy, 60% of companies are growing with a median growth rate of 16.5% while the other 40% are suffering a median 12.5% earnings decline. (…)

Adding Energy companies back in the matrix, we find that 57% of the companies having reported so far show growth in EPS with a median growth rate of 16.5%. The other 43% with declining EPS have a median decline of 15.2%. Given the recent slide in oil prices, looking at equities excluding Energy stocks may no longer be appropriate as the “temporary price drop” looks less and less temporary.

This is not a so-so equity market with so-so earnings. This is more like a twin engine vehicle, one engine pulling forward and one going backward. The resulting standstill gives a false impression that overall things, though admittedly not great, are nonetheless OK.

Averages can sometimes be deceiving, hiding opposite trends which mathematically average into something close to normality. Here’s where the trouble is:

1- With nearly 90% of companies having reported Q2, only 55% of the companies have positive YoY EPS growth.

2- S&P’s index methodology is resulting in Q2 operating EPS actually dropping 9.9% YoY to $26.45. This figure was $28.46 on July 30th. We lost $2.00 last week only. I checked with S&P’s Howard Silverblatt who confirmed this was not a typo. Surprises turned bad by the end of the season and many late reporters showed pretty poor results. Howard pointed out 4 Energy companies which subtracted $0.88 to the Index EPS during the last week. I am doing further work on this to be released later this week.

This is important given that trailing EPS are now $108.61, down 2.6% from the previous quarter (and down 5.1% from their Q3’14 peak of $114.51). Furthermore. the earnings base has shrunk suddenly, jeopardizing future earnings if recent conditions were to persist.

image
Ghost The Dow Is Close to Reaching the Dreaded Death Cross A six-day decline in the Dow Jones Industrial Average is wreaking havoc on the gauge’s price chart, spurring a pattern of congestion in its moving averages that is despised by momentum traders.

(…) More than 100 percent of this year’s increase in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index is attributable to just two sectors. That’s the tightest clustering for an advancing year since 2000, Bloomberg data show. (…)

Wall Street now thinks Fed hike in September will be 2015’s only move: Reuters poll

NEW YORK – Top Wall Street banks still expect the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates in September, but a growing number now believe the central bank is likely to only hike once this year, a Reuters poll found on Friday.

Thirteen of 19 primary dealers, or the banks that deal directly with the Fed, polled said they expect the Fed to raise rates by September but just nine now believe the Fed will hike rates twice in 2015, compared with 15 of 20 in the July Reuters poll.

The median expectation for where the federal funds rate will end the year was 0.5 percent and 1.5 percent for 2016.

Gross Sees Global Economy Dangerously Close to Deflation

Gross pointed to how the CRB Commodity Index isn’t just at a cyclical low, but lower than in 2008 when Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. went bankrupt.

The commodity markets tell a truer story of what is happening in the economy because they are subject to real-time supply and demand, Gross said. Oil, metals and crops have plunged as China’s economy has decelerated and gluts in multiple markets have further depressed prices.

Nonetheless:

Janus’s Bill Gross Confident Fed Will Raise Rates in September

“September is the number for sure,” Gross said Friday in a Bloomberg Radio interview with Tom Keene. “The Fed really wants to get off the dime.”

The Fed is “mentally committed to moving before year end,” Gross said, despite the Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee this week voting 8-1 to keep its key rate at a record low and talking about changing policy next year.

NEW$ & VIEW$ (7 AUGUST 2015): Currency Effects; Oil.

Stronger Dollar Weakens Credit Outlook

Excellent piece from Moody’s:

The ongoing appreciation of the dollar exchange rate stems from the US’s relatively better growth outlook vis-a-vis the rest of the world. However, an unduly strong dollar risks constraining the global competitiveness of US-based production and reducing US corporate profits by enough to significantly weaken prospects for US business activity.

Compared to the respective averages of 2011-2013, the dollar was recently up by 81% against Brazil’s real, 46% versus Japan’s yen, 31% versus Canada’s dollar, 28% against Mexico’s peso, 22% against the euro, and 21% versus India’s rupee. Moreover, according to the same serial comparison, the dollar recently was higher by 19% versus a broad basket of foreign currencies and up by 25% in terms of major foreign currencies.

(…) Higher short-term interest rates are likely to further appreciate the dollar exchange rate and, thereby, put additional downward pressure not only on industrial commodity prices, but on the prices of internationally traded goods and services as well. (…)

Moody’s industrial metals price just fell to its lowest reading since July 29, 2009, which was at the end of the first month of the now 73-month long economic recovery. The latest -26.8% year-to-year plunge by this reliable indicator of global industrial activity reflects an ample surfeit of world production capacity vis-a-vis global expenditures. Continued dollar exchange rate appreciation risks worsening the plight of countries and companies having meaningful direct exposure to industrial commodities.

The dollar last experienced a comparable upswing amid a well-established economic recovery during the late 1990s and into 2000. Partly in response to 1996-2000’s -1.5% average annual rate of deflation for the US import price index excluding petroleum imports, the average annual rate of core PCE price index inflation slowed from 1991-1995’s 2.7% to 1996-2000’s 1.6% notwithstanding an accompanying acceleration by the average annual rate of real GDP growth from 2.6% to 4.3%.

Neither did a climb by the ratio of payrolls to the working-age population from 1995’s 59.1% to1999’s 62.2% prevent a deceleration by core PCE price index inflation. By contrast, payrolls recently approximated a comparatively slack 56.6% of working-age Americans. Given the strong dollar and considerable underutilization outside the US, faster wage growth in the US may have the unwanted effect of further impeding the competitiveness of US production to the eventual detriment of the US labor market.

Dollar strength helped to curb the average annualized growth rate of pretax profits from current production from the 11.0% of the five-years-ended 1995 to the 2.1% of the five-years-ended 2000. Year long 2000’s -5.9% annual contraction by profits helped to trigger 2001’s recession.

The moving yearlong average of profits from current production has already slowed from the 14.9% of the three-years-ended March 2012 to the 3.3% of the three-years-ended March 2015. An even stronger dollar portends a further deceleration by profits, if not an outright annual contraction.

Despite faster than 4% real GDP growth, corporate credit quality deteriorated amid the last extended episode of dollar appreciation. After averaging 368 bp during January 1994 through July 1998, the high-yield bond spread would then average 611 bp for the remainder of the recovery, or until February 2001.

image

The high-yield bond spread’s widening could be ascribed to a drop by the national activity index’s average from January 1994-July 1998’s +0.30 to August 1998-February 2001’s +0.09. Apparently, the national activity index’s loss of momentum mattered more to corporate credit than did the accompanying acceleration by the average annual rate of real GDP growth from 3.8% to 4.2%.

The national activity index’s -0.01 average of Q2-2015 helps to explain why the recent high-yield bond spread of 520 bp tops its 418 median of the previous two economic recoveries. Moreover, the drop by the national activity index’s average from H1-2014’s +0.15 points to H1-2015’s -0.06 was joined by a widening of the high-yield bond spread from 362 bp to 478 bp, respectively.

Wider Spreads May Be Anticipating Diminished Profitability

Corporate bond yield spreads are likely to widen, once profits shrink on a recurring basis. Since 1987, the yearly change of the high-yield bond spread’s quarter-long average shows a meaningful inverse correlation of -0.67 with the yearly percent change of profits from current production. Year-to-year declines by such profits were accompanied by an average 161 bp year-to-year widening for the high-yield spread, where the sample’s midpoint, or median, was a 96 bp increase. (Figure 3.)

image

More on this at the end.

Why Canada May Become a Problem for Janet Yellen

Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen said less than a month ago that she expected the dollar’s drag on the American economy to dissipate. She may not have foreseen that the greenback would surge to an 11-year high against the currency of the U.S.’s biggest trading partner. As the greenback’s advance against the euro and the yen subsided, its 5 percent rally against the Canadian dollar this quarter may prove to be more detrimental to the world’s biggest economy. The U.S.’s northern neighbor buys about 17 percent of America’s products, more than any other nation, data compiled by Bloomberg show. And shipments have already declined after reaching a record last year.

BTW #1:

  • Canadian June trade deficit narrows sharply

The Canadian merchandise trade deficit narrowed to a much smaller than expected $0.5 billion in June 2015 from May’s revised $3.4 billion (was $3.3 billion) shortfall. Market expectations were for a $2.9 billion deficit in June.

Exports jumped by 6.3% to retrace cumulative declines during the first five months of 2015. Imports declined by 0.6% after rising by 0.5% in May and falling by 1.8% in April.

On a volumes basis (using 2007 chained dollars), exports increased by 4.8%, entirely the result of rising non-energy exports, to sit at an all-time high in level terms. Import volumes slipped by 0.8% in June following a 0.3% gain in May and 1.6% drop in April.

The improvement in the June trade balance in volume terms was much larger than expected and, even with earlier weakness, left the net trade balance tracking a 0.5 percentage point addition to second-quarter 2015 gross domestic product (GDP) growth that is stronger than the 0.7 percentage point drag that we had assumed before the report. We expect strong export growth will also be reflected in stronger manufacturing and wholesale trade activity in June, which would contribute to GDP growth in that month returning to the positive column after five consecutive declines to start 2015.

Earlier declines still point to quarterly GDP declining about a percent in the second quarter as a whole to build on the 0.6% drop in the first quarter, with offset to stronger than expected net trade coming from a larger pullback in inventories. Nonetheless, the rise in June exports and improvement in the trade balance were consistent with our view that the economy will return to a positive growth path in the third quarter of 2015, as strength in the US economy and a weaker Canadian dollar provide support to external demand, thereby helping to offset ongoing weakness in the oil and gas sector. (RBC)

BTW #2:

image

  • Who’s Holding Back U.S. Exports?

Net trade has been a thorn in the U.S. economy’s side over the past year, subtracting more than 0.5 ppts from GDP since mid-2014. A strong US$ and soft growth
abroad have clipped U.S. merchandise exports by 5%, or by just over $40 billion (first half of this year vs. first of 2014). What’s notable is where those export
declines have come from: While markets always fret about European turmoil, or China’s slowdown, or Japan’s funk, the drag on U.S. exports is much closer to
home. Exports to Canada were down a whopping $10.9 billion from year-ago levels in the first half of the year, by far the single biggest source of drag in H1. Here’s a quick accounting of the biggest declines:
Canada -$10.9 billion
Europe -$5.1 billion
Brazil -$4.0 billion
OPEC -$3.0 billion
China -$2.6 billion
Colombia -$1.5 billion
Japan -$1.1 billion

German Manufacturing Exports Surge Upward

Data from Germany’s economics ministry showed Thursday that manufacturing orders, adjusted for seasonal swings and inflation, surged 2.0% in June from the previous month, bringing the volume of total orders back to levels last seen in April 2008. (…)

But economists warned that the data—beating forecasts of a 0.2% monthly increase—were inflated by an unusually high volume of bulk orders.

AIDA Cruises, a German cruise line which belongs to Carnival Corporation, placed orders in June for two new ships with Meyer Werft in Lower Saxony. Airbus Group SE, which builds single-aisle planes in Germany, also reported strong aircraft orders during June’s Paris Air Show.

“Excluding such effects, demand was up a more moderate 0.3%,” said Andreas Rees,UniCredit’s chief German economist.

Strong foreign demand also bolstered manufacturers’ order books in June, the ministry said, with a weaker euro exchange rate making eurozone goods more competitive overseas.

Orders from outside the eurozone surged 6.3% from May, while eurozone orders rose 2.3%. Domestic orders meanwhile fell 2.0%, a sign that external demand is increasingly driving economic activity here. (…)

German Industrial Production Drops as Chinese Slowdown Looms

Output, adjusted for seasonal swings and inflation, fell 1.4 percent after rising a revised 0.2 percent in May, data from the Economy Ministry in Berlin showed on Friday.

German manufacturing output fell 1.3 percent in June, driven by a 2.6 percent slump in the production of investment goods, the ministry said. Construction plunged 4.5 percent, while energy output rose 2.3 percent. Total industrial production stagnated in the second quarter.

French industrial production fell 0.1 percent in June and manufacturing output dropped 0.7 percent, national statistics office Insee said on Friday.

MORE FACTS ON CHINA

On the external demand front, however, container freight shipping was weak, registering no sequential growth and a decline in Y/Y growth in the month of July. Currently, shipping volume to North America, Japan, and Southeast Asia is relatively stable but Europe, Red Sea, and Africa volume is weak.

CEBM’s property survey indicates that July completed sales declined compared to June, with the exception of the Beijing market, which registered strong M/M growth. Some developers, primarily located in tier-1 and some tier-2 cities, reported their willingness to start new projects has increased. They believe structural growth opportunities still exit in these cities. (CEBM Research)

Oil Firms Struggle to Turn Off Tap Despite cutbacks and idle drilling rigs, American energy producers are finding it hard to turn off the taps that have helped lead to a global glut of oil.

Rising crude production was a major theme in the past week as shale drillers reported their second-quarter earnings.

Devon Energy Corp. and Whiting Petroleum Corp. said they pulled record amounts of oil from the ground. Anadarko Petroleum Corp. revealed that in some areas it has doubled the number of wells it can drill with a single rig. And Pioneer Natural Resources Co. said it plans to ramp up its drilling activity to pre-oil bust levels by early next year.

Analysts say American oil pumpers need to cut their output by at least 500,000 barrels a day to stem the oversupply that has sent oil prices tumbling over the past 14 months to just under $45 a barrel.

But monthly oil production rose steadily through March, peaking at a record 9.7 million barrels a day that month and just slightly less in April, before edging down to 9.5 million barrels in May, according to the latest federal data. (…)

Roughly 200 oil drilling rigs—about a third the number working today—will also need to come out of the field by 2016.

But companies keep finding ways to drill wells faster and cheaper in an effort to deal with oil that is selling for half the price it was a year ago. They had little incentive to be so innovative when crude oil traded at around $100 a barrel. (…)

Whiting, the biggest shale producer in North Dakota, pumped 170,000 barrels of oil equivalent a day in the second quarter—a record amount for the company.

“We are tooling Whiting to run and grow at $40 to $50 oil,” Chief Executive James Volkersaid.

Amid a refrain about keeping growth in check, executives at Anadarko, a Texas-based oil and gas producer, told analysts last week that the company has doubled its rig efficiency. Anadarko can now drill 70 wells with one rig in Colorado’s Wattenberg field, compared with 35 wells per rig a year ago. (…)

Meanwhile, Pioneer Natural Resources, based in Irving, Texas, expects to pump at least 10% more oil this year than it did in 2014, and earlier this week reiterated plans to add two rigs a month back to its oil patches between now and year’s end. It will also add eight rigs in the first three months of 2016.

That ramp up, Chief Executive Scott Sheffield said, will bring drilling activity back to the level it was before oil prices collapsed in late 2014. (…)

Steven Mueller, chief executive of Southwestern Energy Co. in Houston, said he sees little incentive to grow right now, but can’t justify holding off on drilling for a year—and delaying returns to shareholders—unless he expects prices to rise dramatically. He doesn’t.

“You have to be really bullish on prices to delay,” he said. “So we’ll take our best guess at the future, we’ll drill what looks economic and if there happens to be growth, there will be growth.”

Over the past year, shale producers have lowered their costs so much that the average break-even price for a barrel of U.S. crude is now in the upper $40s, down from $60, according to research from IHS Energy.

image(…) A year ago, futures indicated an average Brent crude-oil price in 2016 through 2018 of about $101 a barrel. Today, that is just under $60. Estimates of future demand have also been marked down slightly.

The implied hit to oil producers’ revenue is about $4.4 trillion spread across those three years.

It is also roughly three times the forecast capital expenditure of the global exploration and production sector, according to a recent survey of 474 oil companies by Cowen. (…)

Big state-backed producers in countries such as Saudi Arabia and Iran are price takersproducing oil for cash flow. Until U.S. onshore output is rationalized significantly—via retrenchment or mergers—the supply cuts necessary to rebalance the market and support prices will have to come from the bigger international projects traditionally operated by the majors.

But this would be a medium-term, rather than quick, process. BP Chief Executive Bob Dudleysaid in a recent interview on the company’s website that he expects the oil-price recovery to look like a “long U.” Indeed, offshore drillers, more exposed to the majors’ plans, have suffered the worst drop of any oil-field services subsector, down roughly a third this year. (…)

(…) At Halliburton, some of the capital to finance the sales will come from $500 million in backing from asset manager BlackRock, part of a wave of alternative finance pouring into the energy industry that one Houston lawyer said on Thursday allows companies to “keep the engine running.”

When its second-quarter net profit tumbled by more than half a billion dollars to just $54 million, Halliburton’s Chief Executive Dave Lesar told analysts the company needed to find new revenue. The BlackRock money, he said, would allow Halliburton to “look at additional ways of doing business with our customers, different business models, push beyond where we have been today.” (…)

Another variant, which Halliburton has considered and Schlumberger has pushed, is one in which the companies cover up-front costs for a producer and then get a piece of a well’s performance.

The services companies have made these special offers to producers in a bid to roll out the new business line of refracking, in which existing wells are worked over to lift output. (…)

EARNINGS WATCH
  • 442 companies (90.5% of the S&P 500’s market cap) have reported. Earnings are beating by 5.3% while revenues have positively surprised by 0.4%.
  • The beat rate is 71%. Ex-Financials: 74%
  • Expectations are for revenue, earnings, and EPS of -3.4%, +0.6%, and +2.0%. EPS growth is on pace for 2.5%, assuming the current 5.3% beat rate for the remainder of the season. This would be 7.4% on a trend basis (ex-Energy and the big-5 banks).
Dollar Now Proves Costly to Revenues and Profits

A global glut of production capacity, a strong dollar, and industrial commodity price deflation weighed on Q2-2015’s sales and profits of US companies. The 87% of the S&P 500 companies that have released Q2-2015 results showed year-to-year setbacks of -4.9% for sales and -1.7% for operating profits. After excluding the energy sector’s deep year-to-year plunges of -33.0% for sales and -55.3% for operating income, the remaining members of the S&P 500 posted yearly increases of 1.0% for sales and 5.3% for profits.

image

Elsewhere, the annual decline by the sum of the sales of manufacturers, retailers, and wholesalers deepened from Q1-2015’s -1.2% to Q2-2015’s likely -2.0%. After excluding sales of identifiable energy products, the yearly growth of core business sales ebbed from Q1-2015’s 3.8% to Q2-2015’s 2.1%.

Unless sales accelerate convincingly, businesses are likely to spend more cautiously. Thus, second-half 2015’s average monthly increase by private-sector payrolls is likely to fall noticeably under first-half 2015’s 200,000 new jobs per month.

Faltering leadership
  • Leading stocks continue to falter as the IBD 50 index of leading stocks did not rebound with the S&P and are now already back at their July lows ahead of the S&P
  • The IBD 50 stock index is testing key support at US$24.20.
  • Relative performance is negative increasing the probability of a breakdown.
  • A further breakdown will see an extended trend of leadership stocks being hit. (NBF)

image

US equity markets are again stress testing important technical support ‘bands’ between the March/July lows (S&P ~2040) and 200- dma’s (2070) heading into this Friday’s ‘important’ NFP report and the seasonally weak time frame through the end of Q3. The market indexes continue to mask the wide range of chart price profiles from accelerating growth stocks, such as FB, to multi-quarter bear markets in most global cyclicals/resource stocks. (RBC Capital)

AMAZING AMAZON:

Amazon sales grew $5b in 2Q, accounting for 25% of overall retail sales growth, which was $20b. (ISI)