The enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it’s the illusion of knowledge (Stephen Hawking)

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so (Mark Twain)

Invest with smart knowledge and objective odds

NEW$ & VIEW$ (15 APR. 2015):”Unhealthy” retail sales; Sicky China; Murky oil; OK earnings.

Consumers Open Wallets, Cautiously

Sales at retailers and restaurants increased 0.9% last month to a seasonally adjusted $441.4 billion, the Commerce Department said Tuesday. That was the biggest monthly gain in a year, but it was still down from November, when retail sales reached their highest level since the end of the recession.

Compared with a year earlier, overall retail sales were up 1.3% in March. In March 2014, the year-over-year increase was 4.5%. (…)

The higher sales were largely driven by car purchases, which rose 2.7% last month. But weak sales at gas stations continued to hold back overall growth, despite an uptick in oil prices in March. When excluding both gasoline and autos, sales rose 0.5% last month.

A surge in spending at home-improvement stores, including building supplies and garden-equipment retailers, also helped boost sales in March.

Core sales are barely up YoY:

Click to View

The next chart illustrates retail sales “Control” purchases, which is an even more “Core” view of retail sales. This series excludes Motor Vehicles & Parts, Gasoline, Building Materials as well as Food Services & Drinking Places. Note the highlighted values at the start of the two recessions since the inception of this series in the early 1990s.

Click to View

BloombergBriefs adds this on control sales:

The quarterly average for retail control had been running at 0.1 percent (quarter on quarter annualized rate), compared with 4.2 percent in the fourth quarter and 4.4 percent in the third. Retail control rose 0.3 percent in March, but February was revised down to minus 0.2 percent. January declined 0.2 percent as well. This pushed the quarter average into negative territory (minus 0.7 percent). That bodes poorly for spending in GDP data; retail control is a direct GDP input. Consumers contributed a decent March performance, but well short of salvaging an otherwise dismal first quarter.

Retail Control Points to Weak Spending Role in 1Q GDP

Ed Yardeni has the chart on real core sales:

What’s the problem? It might be our health. American consumers now spend a record $8,066 per capita annually on health care. Thanks to Obamacare, we are all paying more to the piper. The out-of-pocket costs of health care have increased significantly, with higher premiums and co-pays and bigger deductibles. Unfortunately, it’s hard to quantify this because statistics are not available. The government’s data show total spending on health care without showing payments made by the government, insurance companies, and consumers.

For retailers, Q1’15 looks ok YoY because last year’s base was so weak. Sequentially, things are not so good. The hope is that March is the beginning of a positive trend:

image
Small Businesses Not as Upbeat

The National Federation of Independent Business‘s small-business optimism index fell to 95.2 in March, from 98 in February. Economists surveyed by The Wall Street Journal projected the index to hold at 98.0. The NFIB said the index is the lowest since June 2014 and is back below its long-term average. All 10 subindexes declined last month.

Readings on plans to add jobs and raise capital spending took hits. The subindex covering plans to create new jobs fell two percentage points to 10%. The capital outlays subindex dropped two points to 24%. Overall, only 10% of respondents thought now is a good time to expand, a drop of three points from February.

Part of the weaker hiring number reflects a rise in recent hires. The average increase in workers added per firm was 0.18 worker in March, which the NFIB said bested the “excellent” readings of 0.16 in January and February. Also, the mismatch of labor eased somewhat. The subindex covering jobs that are hard to fill fell five points to 24%. But of those looking for workers, 84% said they were seeing few or no applicants who were qualified for the open positions.

In addition to cuts in hiring, small businesses are also trimming their physical expansion plans. Only 24% of owners plan to make capital outlays in the near term. That’s down from 26% in February and “not a strong reading historically,” the report said.  Unlike hiring, the drop in spending plans does not follow a speed-up in past spending. In March, 58% of small business owners reported making capital outlays, down 2 points from February.

NFIB Small Business 041415

The Student-Loan Problem Is Even Worse Than Official Figures Indicate More Americans are behind on student-debt payments than official measures suggest.

Nearly one in three Americans who are now having to pay down their student debt–or a staggering 31.5%–are at least a month behind on their payments, new research from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis suggests. That figure is far higher than official delinquency measures reported by the Education Department and the New York Fed. And it’s also likely the most accurate.

Here’s why: The official measures reflect delinquencies as a share of all Americans with student debt, but millions of borrowers aren’t even required to make payments yet. Many are currently in college or grad school and thus don’t have to make payments until six months after they leave. Others are out of school and past that grace period but have received permission by their lender—the federal government in most cases—to suspend payments for a range of reasons, such as being unemployed.

Including these borrowers in the broader pool of student-loan debt makes official delinquency rates artificially low. For example, figures from the New York Fed’s quarterly report on household credit shows roughly 17% of all student-loan borrowers were at least 30 days behind on a payment at the start of this year. That’s still a very high number, but misleading nonetheless.

A more precise way of measuring delinquencies is to just look at borrowers who are required to make payments. In their new paper, St. Louis Fed researchers Juan M. Sánchez and Lijun Zhu determined that, as of Jan. 1, more than half of student-loan debt–55%– was held by borrowers who were in repayment. The remaining 45% weren’t in repayment.

Stripping out the borrowers not in repayment, they concluded that 31.5% of Americans with student debt were at least 30 days behind on a payment at that time. This matches up with previous research from the New York Fed suggesting the actual delinquency rate is likely double the official delinquency measure, when excluding borrowers not in repayment.

Delinquencies on student debt are far higher than those for other forms of consumer credit, including credit cards, mortgages and auto loans. For example, 8.5% of all auto loans were at least 30 days delinquent in the year through last September, according to the Kansas City Fed.

The researchers point to a kernel of good news: Delinquencies are no longer rising. But they’re not going down, either. Delinquencies spiked after the recession and then again in 2012 before falling and leveling off in the past few years.

U.S. Producer Prices Up in March

The producer-price index for final demand, which measures prices that businesses receive for their goods and services, increased a seasonally adjusted 0.2% last month from February, the Labor Department said Tuesday. Excluding the volatile food and energy categories, the index rose 0.2% as well.

From a year earlier, producer prices are still down 0.8%, but the index is up 0.9% on the year when removing food and energy.

The advance in the final demand index is largely due to a 0.3% increase in the price of goods. Vehicle prices, up 1.9%, posted their largest monthly increase since October 2008.

When excluding food, energy and trade services, the final-demand index was up 0.2% in March from February.

China Growth Slowest in Six Years at 7% China’s economy started the year on a downbeat note with its slowest quarterly growth rate since 2009, pointing to a further loss of momentum.

Chart: China real GDP growthThe growth figure — the second-lowest since 2001 – affords Beijing little cushion in hitting its 7% annual growth target. Other figures released on Wednesday suggest further weakness in the economy, which economists say could prompt Beijing to act further. (…)

Industrial production grew by 5.6% year-over-year in March, according to the statistics bureau, well below economists’ expectations of 6.9%, as factories continued to battle deflationary pressure and weak demand at home and abroad. Fixed-asset investment in the first quarter grew by 13.5% year on year, the agency said, slightly below economists’ expectations of 13.9%. China’s housing sales in the first quarter fell 9.1% compared with a 7.8% decline for all of 2014. The statistics agency doesn’t break out monthly investment or property figures. Retail sales in March grew by 10.2%. (…)

“The downward pressure on economic growth continues to increase,” Premier Li Keqiang said at a meeting with economists and business leaders Tuesday. He added that growth remains within a “reasonable range.” (…)

At a news conference Wednesday, statistics agency official Shen Laiyun said that China’s unemployment rate was about 5.1% according to a recent survey, which he said was roughly in line with last year’s level. (…)

Note that “the 5.1% figure is an internal measure that China only occasionally discloses and is considered somewhat more reliable than the official figures China usually releases.”

Much like in the U.S. and Japan:

Chinese nominal household expenditures also grew relatively slowly in the first quarter, although some of the moderation in nominal consumer spending is surely the price effect of cheaper gasoline and diesel.  (Charts from FT)

Chart: China key activity indicators

Scared? Look at this next chart from Zerohedge:

Pointing up Note that the 7.0% GDP growth rate everybody os quoting today is YoY. China said growth was +1.3% QoQ SA, +5.3% annualized. This is down from +1.5% in Q4’14 and +1.9% in Q3’14. Big slowdown.

Eurozone Data Suggest ECB Stimulus Bearing Fruit The European Central Bank’s ample stimulus measures are boosting lending to companies and aiding industrial production by weakening the euro.

The report showed a sharp increase in the number of banks that now expect a rise in demand for corporate loans in the second quarter. The net percentage—the difference in the share of banks expecting demand to rise versus those expecting a fall—hit 39 in the second quarter, compared with only 17 in the first. (…)

“For the second quarter of 2015, banks expect a small net easing of credit standards on loans to enterprises,” it said, while for home loans “a further net tightening of credit standards” was expected.

The survey said banks have used added liquidity from ECB asset buys over the last six months “in particular for granting loans and intend to do so also in the coming months.” (…)

The European Union’s statistics agency said that production by factories, mines and utilities was 1.1% higher in February than in January, and 1.6% higher than in the same month a year earlier.

That performance indicates the euro’s depreciation since May 2014 is finally proving a game-changer for exporters, among whom manufacturers predominate. That is consistent with a March survey of manufacturers, which recorded the strongest rise in new export orders since April 2014.

Oil Prices Rise Oil prices rose again as the international energy watchdog struck an upbeat note on demand so far this year but warned the outlook remains “murky.”

The International Energy Agency, which advises industrialized nations on oil policies, said oil demand would rise by 1.1 million barrels a day this year, which would be a “notable acceleration” on last year’s 700,000 barrels a day growth. (…)

“One of the many questions hanging over the market today is, how quickly could Iran be expected to ramp up output and exports if the agreement were to be made permanent?” the IEA asked. (…)

But the IEA said Wednesday that the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, led by Saudi Arabia, had throttled production by up to 31 million barrels a day in March, more than a million barrels above its agreed ceiling—possibly to lock in customers before sanctions are lifted on Iran. (…)

OPEC’s output rose by 890,000 barrels a day in March to a near two-year high of 31.02 million a day a day, as Saudi Arabia pushed output to record levels and supplies recovered in Iraq and Libya, the report said.

Crude oil supplies in the kingdom, the world’s largest exporter and OPEC’s de facto leader, rose by 390,000 barrels a day in March to an average 10.01 million barrels, the highest level since September 2013, the IEA said.

The IEA said preliminary data suggest that March’s output surge, the biggest monthly gain since June 2011, signal that OPEC production may rise further in April. (…)

There are signs that American production could slow earlier than forecast, the IEA said, trimming its prediction for U.S. crude oil growth by 50,000 barrels a day to 550,000 barrels a day in 2015. Growth estimates for North American production including Canada in the second half were trimmed by 160,000 barrels a day.

Senators, Obama Yield on Iran Key senators forged a bipartisan compromise to give Congress review power over a final nuclear deal with Iran, winning the endorsement of a reluctant White House.

(…) Under the agreement, Mr. Obama wouldn’t be able to waive sanctions on Iran for 30 days while Congress initially reviewed a final agreement struck to diminish Iran’s nuclear capabilities. Lawmakers would then be able to vote to approve or disapprove of the deal, or to take no action. If Congress passed a resolution rejecting the deal, Mr. Obama would have 12 days to veto the measure. If he vetoed it, Congress would have 10 days to try to override his veto, which requires a two-thirds majority.

The original bill, opposed by the White House, would have given Congress 60 days to review the deal.

Even if Congress were to approve the deal, it would have to vote separately to permanently lift congressional sanctions. (…)

EARNINGS WATCH
  • 31 companies (9.7% of the S&P 500’s market cap) have reported. Earnings are beating by 4.5% while revenues have missed by 0.7%.
  • Expectations are for a decline in revenue, earnings, and EPS of -2.9%, -4.1%, and -2.6%. Excluding Energy, growth would be 2.6%, 3.9%, and 5.6%, respectively. This excludes the likelihood of beats, which have come in above 4% historically. (RBC Capital)

NEW$ & VIEW$ (14 APR. 2015): Have margins peaked?

U.S. Retail Sales +0.9% in March.

The U.S. Census Bureau announced today that advance estimates of U.S. retail and food services sales for March, adjusted for seasonal variation and
holiday and trading-day differences, but not for price changes, were $441.4 billion, an increase of 0.9 percent (±0.5%) from the previous month, and 1.3
percent (±0.9%) above March 2014. Total sales for the January 2015 through March 2015 period were up 2.2 percent (±0.7%) from the same period a
year ago. The January 2015 to February 2015 percent change was revised from -0.6 percent (±0.5%) to -0.5 percent (±0.2%).

image

Japan’s Retail Sales Rise in February But Can’t Shake Weak Trends

The disappointing report of the day was from retail sales. The chart above shows that three-month, six- month and 12-month trends in retail sales are still negative with sales contracting.

The table shows that while retail sales rose in all the categories in February they still are falling at a 6.1% annual rate over three months and a falling at a 2% annual rate year-over-year. Only motor vehicles and food sales show any tendency toward acceleration. Clothing sales are still decelerating sharply. Its sequential growth rates and those for `other’ retail sales also exhibit a sharp deceleration, especially over three months, led by severe weakness in January.

Since all sales were weak or slow in January, the quarter-to-date data show weakness as well. Overall sales are falling at a 7.6% annual rate in the quarter-to-date with sharp declines in clothing and footwear and in `other’ retail. However, motor vehicle purchases as well as food, beverages and tobacco purchases are showing growth.

Of course, dropping energy prices are still playing havoc with overall sales patterns. Motor vehicle sales and foods sales are free of direct energy effects and there sales are advancing. However, clothing also is free of any direct energy impact and sales there are weakening. The `other’ category embodies direct energy effects and is severely weak.

For now we can be somewhat encouraged that sales did rebound in February after two straight months of declines and after three declines in the past five months. The 0.5% gain is the largest gain in overall sales since September 2014 when sales rose by 1.8%. But that optimistic assessment is damped by the fact that sales are only rebounding weakly from a 1.6% drop in January.

large image

HOW TIGHT IS JAPAN’S LABOUR MARKET?

In February, the ratio of job-openings to applicants stood at 1.15. This marks the highest point in almost 25 years. These latest figures should be encouraging, both to the central bank and to the government. However, to what extent is overall wage growth sustainable?

ratio of jobs to applicants
The shortage of labour is not an economy-wide issue. Sectors such as medicine, care and construction now enjoy more job openings than used to be the case. These are sought after sectors due to the aging population and increased contruction following the earthquake and tsunami that occurred in March 2011. However, the ratio of job openings to applicants in other sectors has remained little changed. As it is not easy for workers to move between sectors, the shortage of workers in some sectors is unlikely to push aggregate wages up.

PM Abe’s campaign to end the country’s prolonged deflationary period hinges on achieving sustainable wage growth. The BoJ also counts on this to reach its 2% CPI target. The rising overall ratio of job-openings to applicants is promising. However, it is only some sectors that are experiencing shortages of labour. There are natural labour market rigidities meaning that a worker with one kind of skill set can struggle to move to an occupation that requires another type of skill set. Therefore, the current scarcity of labour in some sectors of the economy may not be a good indicator of overall wage pressure. We need to see tightness in a wider range of sectors before the labour market as a whole can be considered to be putting upward pressure on wages and inflation.

Italy’s production figures provide reassurance over growth

Industrial production in Italy rose 0.6 per cent in February, offering comfort that the eurozone’s third-largest economy would this year emerge from three years of recession.

The increase in factory activity marks a rebound compared with a 0.7 per cent decline in January that had raised concerns about the ability of Italy’s manufacturing sector to help drive the recovery.

The 0.6 per cent increase in industrial production in February was the largest jump since last June. Compared with the same period last year, however, industrial production slid by 0.2 per cent in February.

OIL
Shale Oil Boom Could End in May After Price Collapse

Output from the prolific tight-rock formations such as North Dakota’s Bakken shale will decline 57,000 barrels a day in May, the Energy Information Administration said Monday. It’s the first time the agency has forecast a drop in output since it began issuing a monthly drilling productivity report in 2013.

The EIA’s May production forecasts cover the yield from major plays that together accounted for 90 percent of domestic output growth from 2011 to 2012.

Output from the Eagle Ford in Texas, the second-largest oil field in the U.S., is expected to fall 33,000 barrels a day in May to 1.69 million. Production in the Bakken region of North Dakota will decline 23,000 to 1.3 million, the EIA said.

Yield from the Permian Basin in West Texas and New Mexico, the largest U.S. oil field, will continue to rise, by 11,000 barrels a day to 1.99 million.

The decline in domestic production will come just as U.S. refineries start processing more oil following seasonal maintenance, easing the biggest glut since 1930. The withdrawal from U.S. oil stockpiles is expected to bring relief to a market that’s seen prices drop by more than $50 a barrel since June.

China on Oil-Buying Spree Again State-run Chinaoil could surpass its monthly record for spot market oil purchases if it keeps up its current buying pace.

China National United Oil Corp., the trading unit of state-run China National Petroleum Corp. known as Chinaoil, has bought a total of 19 physical oil cargoes for delivery in June or July so far in April, Singapore-based traders said. That is equal to 9.5 million barrels of oil, and is Chinaoil’s largest spot market purchase since October last year when it bought a country record 47 cargoes, or 23.5 million barrels of oil.

With over half a month of trading still left, Chinaoil could surpass its October volumes if it keeps up its current buying pace. (…)

Have Profit Margins Peaked?

Both the S&P and the US Bureau of Economic Analysis reported that profit margins dipped during Q4-2014. The former was at 10.2%, while the latter was at 10.4%. But both remained near their record highs of the previous quarter. One of our accounts observed that data that I compile are showing a possible peak in the forward profit margins of the S&P 500/400/600. That’s not so clear for the S&P 500, where the margin peaked at a record high of 10.8% during the week of December 4, 2014. It did dip recently, but edged up over the past few weeks back to 10.6% in early April.

The dips are more noticeable and remain underway for the SMidCaps. For the S&P 400, the forward profit margin is down from last year’s peak of 6.7% during the week of June 19 to 6.2% currently. For the S&P 600, it is down from the 2013 peak of 6.1% during the week of October 3 to 5.5% currently.

The perceptive fellow who brought this to our attention wondered why margins seem to be coming down more for smaller than for larger firms. That’s a good question, assuming that the forward profit margins accurately reflect the situation. We think so. We calculate the data by dividing forward earnings by forward revenues.

The pace of employment has picked up over the past year. ADP data through March show that payrolls are up 2.9 million y/y, with large companies adding 546,000, medium-sized companies adding 1.0 million, and small companies adding 1.3 million. The additional payrolls may squeeze margins more for small firms than for large firms simply because add-to-staffs are more significant to the budgets of the former than the latter.

In any event, profit margins may be peaking across the board, though they aren’t likely to tumble until the next recession. If they have peaked, then profits growth will be determined mostly by revenues growth, which is likely to be below 5% this year and next year.

Pointing up Meanwhile, First Call earnings revisions keep declining as analysts reduce forward earnings.

US companies unleash share buyback binge Shareholders on track for $1tn in cash returns this year

(…) Tobias Levkovich, a strategist with Citi, notes that over the past decade, S&P 500 companies have repurchased $4tn worth of shares — in part to offset stock options offered to employees — while domestic investors have added less than $100bn to the mix.

“The lack of US retail investor interest in stocks has been stunning and equity market tops usually consist of overly aggressive individual investor interest in the asset class,” says Mr Levkovich.

The pace of companies buying back their own shares now accounts for more than 2 per cent of overall equity volumes in the US and contributed 2.3 per cent to earnings growth for the S&P 500 last year, according to strategists with JPMorgan. That figure, the brokerage says, will probably accelerate this year as a slide in the dollar and oil cut into earnings gains from underlying operations.

(…) Qualcomm, Lowes, General Motors and Simon Property have initiated or authorised multibillion-dollar increases to share buyback programmes in the past two months, while the financial sector cleared a key hurdle in early March when the Federal Reserve gave a green light to dividend increases and repurchase plans from the country’s largest banks. Citigroup,American Express and JPMorgan led a group of nearly two dozen financials that committed as much as $50bn to buybacks over the next five quarters.

Attention has now shifted to Apple, the exemplar of share repurchases, which is expected to announce changes to its multiyear $130bn programme in late April. (…)