The enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it’s the illusion of knowledge (Stephen Hawking)

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so (Mark Twain)

Invest with smart knowledge and objective odds

THE DAILY EDGE (17 July 2017)

U.S. Retail Sales Fell 0.2% in June Decline contributed to the first back-to-back sales drop since July and August 2016

Retail sales had declined a revised 0.1% in May. It was the first back-to-back sales drop since July and August 2016. (…)

Excluding autos, sales were down 0.2% last month; economists had expected a 0.2% gain. Excluding both autos and gasoline, sales fell 0.1% in June, the first decline for the measure in nearly a year.

In the second quarter, total retail sales were up just 0.2% from the first three months of the year. Overall retail sales rose 3.9% in the first half of 2017 compared with the same period a year earlier, well outpacing the recent trend for consumer-price inflation. (…)

Sales at nonstore retailers, mostly online-shopping outlets, were up 0.4% from May and rose 9.2% on the year. (…)

Retail Sales YoY
 Core Retail Sales YoY
  • The next chart illustrates retail sales “Control” purchases, which is an even more “Core” view of retail sales. This series excludes Motor Vehicles & Parts, Gasoline, Building Materials as well as Food Services & Drinking Places.
Control Sales YoY
US Restaurant Industry Stuck In Worst Collapse Since 2009

One month after we reported that the “restaurant industry hasn’t reported a positive month since February 2016“, we can add one more month to the running total: according to the latest update from Black Box Intelligence‘s TDn2K research, in June both same-store sales and foot traffic “growth” declined once more, dropping by -1% and -3%, respectively, extending the longest stretch of year-over-year declines for the US restaurant industry to 16 consecutive months – the longest stretch since the financial crisis – with sales rising in 45 markets while declining in 150 with Texas, the worst region in the US, suffering a 2.2% and 4.1% decline in sales and traffic respectively. (…)

Source: TDn2K

Auto Defaults Are Soaring
U.S. CPI Again Weaker than Expected in June

The headline index was unchanged from May (+1.6% y/y) against a market expectation (from the Action Economics Forecast Survey) of a 0.1% m/m increase. This index had unexpectedly slipped 0.1% m/m in May. The core index (that excludes food and energy prices) edged up 0.1% m/m (1.7% y/y, remaining at its lowest reading since May 2015) in May but market expectations were for a 0.2% m/m rise in June.

The energy index declined again in June, falling 1.6% m/m (+2.3%y/y), offsetting the monthly increase in the index for all items less food and energy. This was this index’s fifth monthly decline in the past six months. All the major energy component indexes declined in June, with the gasoline prices falling 2.8% m/m (-0.4% y/y). The food index was unchanged in June from May (+0.9% y/y) following a 0.2% m/m increase in May.

The June increase in the index for all items less food and energy was its third straight such increase. The rise was due to core services prices. Goods prices excluding food and energy fell 0.1% m/m (-0.6% y/y) for their fourth consecutive monthly decline. Of the major categories, only prices of medical care goods posted a monthly increase (+0.7% m/m, +3.2% y/y) in June.

Prices of services excluding energy rose 0.2% m/m in June (+2.5% y/y) with monthly increases in all the major subcategories. The shelter index continued to rise (+0.2% m/m), and the indexes for medical care (+0.3% m/m), motor vehicle insurance (+1.0% m/m), education (+0.3% m/m), and personal services (+0.3% m/m) also increased. Airfares (-2.7% m/m) and prices for wireless telephone services (-0.8% m/m) fell in June.

large image

  • The good news about the softening consumer inflation is the recent improvement in real (inflation adjusted) wages. (The Daily Shot)

U.S. Industrial Production Improves

Industrial production increased 0.4% during June (2.0% y/y) following a May 0.1% gain, revised from no change. A 0.3% increase had been expected in the Action Economics Forecast Survey. A 1.6% rise (9.9% y/y) in mining output drove the total higher, strong for the fifth month this year. Utilities output held steady (-2.2% y/y).

Factory sector production gained 0.2% (1.2% y/y) as it followed a 0.4% decline. Consumer products production held steady (0.3% y/y) as nondurable goods output declined 0.3% both m/m and y/y. (…) Motor vehicle & parts production gained 0.7% (0.9% y/y) and computer & video output rose 0.3% (4.5% y/y). Production of business equipment rose 0.2% (0.8% y/y), but information processing & related equipment production fell 0.3% (+4.5% y/y).

image

ECRI Weekly Leading Index: WLI Growth Index Continues Decline in 2017
 image image
image
First-Time Home Buyers Show More Interest in Market

Google searches related to buying a first home jumped 11 percentage points to 44% of all home buying-related search activity in 2017 compared with a year earlier, according to a study of Google search data conducted by Chase Home Lending.

In all, first-time buyers accounted for 33% of all home sales in May, up from 30% a year earlier, according to the most recent data from the National Association of Realtors. (…)

But so far this year, new purchasers accounted for 42% of all buying this year through April, up from 40% in 2016 and 31% during the lowest point during the recent housing cycle in 2011, according to the most recent data from Fannie Mae, which defines first-time buyers as anyone who hasn’t owned a home in the last three years.

Some first-time buyers captured by the Fannie Mae data are older, including former spouses who downsize after a divorce or death or people who rented for a period after losing their homes to foreclosure.

But by another measure, young people in particular are getting more active in the housing market. Customers under the age of 35 made up 36% of Chase’s mortgage origination volume in 2016, up 16 percentage points from the year before. (…)

China Maintains 6.9% Economic Growth as Beijing Walks Tightrope

China’s growth data released Monday by the National Bureau of Statistics came in above a forecast for 6.8% growth by economists polled by The Wall Street Journal.

On a quarter-over-quarter, seasonally adjusted basis, gross domestic product expanded 1.7%, the bureau said, compared with growth of 1.3% in the first quarter, suggesting that momentum in the economy may be even stronger than the year-over-year figure indicates. (…)

Industrial output rose 7.6% in June from a year earlier, coming in above both May’s 6.5% gain and market expectations. Retail sales grew by 11.0% in June from a year earlier, accelerating from the previous month’s 10.7% and also beating forecasts. Fixed-asset investment in nonrural areas of China climbed 8.6% year over year in the first six months of 2017, matching the increase in the January-May period but exceeding economists’ expectations.

A deceleration in property investment was an indication that still-robust housing sales might lose steam later this year. Large developers have pulled back on new construction as credit becomes harder to come by and local governments set restrictions on property purchases. The property sector accounts for about a third of overall GDP. (…)

EARNINGS WATCH

From Factset:

Overall, 6% of the companies in the S&P 500 have reported earnings to date for the second quarter. Of these companies, 80% have reported actual EPS above the mean EPS estimate, 10% have reported actual EPS equal to the mean EPS estimate, and 10% have reported actual EPS below the mean EPS estimate. The percentage of companies reporting EPS above the mean EPS estimate is above the 1-year (70%) average and above the 5-year (68%) average.

Surprised smile In aggregate, companies are reporting earnings that are 8.2% above expectations. This surprise percentage is above the 1-year (+4.7%) average and above the 5-year (+4.2%) average.

In terms of revenues, 83% of companies have reported actual sales above estimated sales and 17% have reported actual sales below estimated sales. The percentage of companies reporting sales above estimates is well above the 1-year average (56%) and well above the 5-year average (53%).

In aggregate, companies are reporting sales that are 1.7% above expectations. This surprise percentage is above the 1-year (+0.5%) average and above the 5-year (+0.5%) average.

The blended earnings growth rate for the second quarter is 6.8% today, which is higher than the earnings growth rate of 6.4% last week. If the Energy sector is excluded, the blended earnings growth rate for the remaining ten sectors would fall to 4.3% [+3.9% last week] from 6.8%.

The blended sales growth rate for the second quarter is 4.8% today, which is equal to the sales growth rate of 4.8% last week. If the Energy sector is excluded, the blended revenue growth rate for the index would fall to 3.9% from 4.8%.

image

Thomson Reuters IBES compilation gives Q2 ES rising 8.1%, +5.2% ex-Energy 

(…) J.P. Morgan Chase led the way with record profit in the second quarter of $7.03 billion. Even so, executives cut their guidance for lending growth in 2017 as well as for interest income. (…)

“It’s just unfortunate, but it’s hurting us, it’s hurting the body politic, it’s hurting the average American,” Mr. Dimon said of Washington inaction. “We have become one of the most bureaucratic, confusing, litigious societies on the planet. It’s almost an embarrassment to be an American citizen traveling around the world and listening to the stupid shit we have to deal with in this country.

“We have to get our act together,” he added. (…)

(…) J.P. Morgan said it now expects net interest income to rise by around $4 billion this year, down from its earlier expectation of $4.5 billion, on slower loan growth and a decline in long-term interest rates during the second quarter. (…)

But in the second quarter its total loans were up just 4% from a year earlier, compared with 6% in the first quarter and 7% for all of last year.

Others are feeling the impact even more strongly. Total average loans at Wells Fargo were up just 1% from a year earlier, compared with 4% in the first quarter. (…)

OPEC Quietly Opened the Taps in June
SENTIMENT WATCH

(…) Taken together, the indicators pointed to an economy that is entering the ninth year of expansion steady and still creating jobs at a healthy clip, but without obvious additional momentum. (…)

“Rather, the data indicate that hopes for a prolonged period of 3% GDP growth sparked by Trump’s victory have largely vanished, aside from a temporary snapback expected in the second quarter.” (…)

For the recently ended second quarter, forecasting firm Macroeconomic Advisers projected 2.3% growth and the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta’s high-profile GDPNow model predicted a 2.4% growth pace. (…)

(…) The greenback sank to a 10-month low Friday, rounding out its worst week since May, as weaker-than-forecast economic data raised doubts about the prospect of additional Federal Reserve tightening this year.  (…)

CETERIS NON PARIBUS:

THE DAILY EDGE (12 June 2017)

Canada’s job market surges, but wage growth lags

Employers topped expectations and created a net 55,000 new jobs in May, the biggest gain since last fall, as a surge in full-time positions offset part-time losses. Both the private and public sectors beefed up hiring, and more Canadians participated in the labour force, according to Statistics Canada’s monthly jobs report released on Friday.

However, wage increases remained bleak by historical standards, even though they rebounded slightly from a record low in April.

Average hourly earnings across all industries rose 1 per cent to $25.88 over May of last year. In April, the average was up 0.5 per cent.

“Even full-time jobs can be low quality,” said Benjamin Tal, deputy chief economist with Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce. “More and more of those jobs are being created in the low-quality segment of the labour market.”

The loss of high-paying natural-resources jobs in Alberta has weighed on the national average.

But other factors have contributed to the recent weakness. Wage growth remains below historical standards for the majority of industries, including higher-paying areas such as manufacturing, natural resources and finance, according to National Bank of Canada data.

Also, earnings for some of the highest-paying industries have declined. For example, the average hourly wage in the finance industry fell 0.7 per cent to $29.56 over May of last year.

Education dropped 1 per cent to $31.94. Professional, scientific and technical services – the industry responsible for creating a good portion of the new jobs – declined 2.5 per cent to $32.20.Another government report showed that workers paid by the hour received meagre increases. Their average hourly earnings increased 0.9 per cent year over year, while the average earnings of salaried employees rose 2 per cent, according to Statistics Canada’s Survey of Employment, Payrolls and Hours, which is considered quite accurate because it uses payroll data.

The unemployment rate rose to 6.6 per cent from 6.5 per cent as more Canadians searched for work. On top of professional services, there were new hires in manufacturing, trade, transportation and health care. This helped the economy create 317,000 new jobs over the past year. (…)

On the flip side, regions less dependent on natural resources – Ontario, Quebec and British Columbia – boosted employment, with Quebec’s unemployment rate hitting a record low of 6 per cent. (…)

First 5 months of 2017, Canada has created 185,000 full-time jobs! YoY: +1.8% (U.S. is +1.2%). Manufacturing jobs jumped 25,300 in May (U.S. was flat).

Wage growth low as Germans look beyond pay packets Labour reforms and desire to stay competitive curb salary rises in strong economy

PEAK OIL DEMAND: FACT OR FICTION?
EARNINGS WATCH

From Facset:

Overall, the estimated earnings growth rate for Q2 2017 of 6.6% today is below the estimated earnings growth rate of 8.7% at the start of the quarter (December 31). Ten sectors have recorded a decline in expected earnings growth since the beginning of the quarter due to downward revisions to earnings estimates, led by the Energy and Materials sectors.

This 1.9% decline in the EPS estimate for Q2 2017 is below the trailing 1-year (-2.5%) average, the trailing 5-year (-3.5%), and the trailing 10- year average (-4.2%) for the bottom-up EPS estimate for the first two months of a quarter.

If the Energy sector is excluded, the estimated earnings growth rate for the remaining ten sectors would fall to 3.7% from 6.6%.

The Information Technology sector is expected to report the second highest (year-over-year) earnings growth of all eleven sectors at 9.3%. The Semiconductor & Semiconductor Equipment sector is forecast to grow EPS by 40% in Q2. If the Semiconductor & Semiconductor Equipment industry is excluded, the estimated earnings growth rate for the Information Technology sector would fall to 3.2% from 9.3%. At the company level, Micron Technology is predicted to be the largest contributor to earnings growth for this sector. The mean EPS estimate for Micron Technology for Q2
2017 is $1.50, compared to year-ago EPS of -$0.08. If this company alone is excluded, the estimated earnings growth rate for the Information Technology sector would fall to 5.9% from 9.3%.

The estimated revenue growth rate for Q2 2017 is 4.9%. If the Energy sector is excluded, the estimated revenue growth rate for the index would fall to 3.8% from 4.9%.

At this point in time, 112 companies in the index have issued EPS guidance for Q2 2017. Of these 112 companies, 75 have issued negative EPS guidance and 37 have issued positive EPS guidance. The percentage of companies issuing negative EPS guidance is 67%, which is below the 5-year average of 75%.

While the number of companies issuing negative EPS is slightly below the 5-year average (79), the number of companies issuing positive EPS guidance is well above the 5-year average (27). If 37 is the final number for the quarter, it will mark the highest number of S&P 500 companies issuing positive EPS guidance since Q1 2012 (also 37).

In the Information Technology sector, 17 companies have issued positive EPS guidance for the second quarter. This number is well above the 5-year average for the sector (9). If 17 is the final number for the quarter, it will mark the third highest number of companies issuing positive EPS guidance for this sector since FactSet began tracking EPS guidance in 2006. Nine of these 17 companies are in the Semiconductor & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This industry is
projected to report the highest earnings growth (40%) of the seven industries in this sector.

In the Health Care sector, 10 companies have issued positive EPS guidance for the second quarter. This number is well above the 5-year average for the sector (3). If 10 is the final number for the quarter, it will mark the highest number of companies issuing positive EPS guidance for this sector since FactSet began tracking EPS guidance in 2006. Five of these 10 companies are in the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This industry is projected to report the highest earnings growth (10%) of the six industries in this sector.

image

Let’s review and analyse this info a little bit further:

  • Earnings growth is expected at +6.6% (before surprises!), from +14.0% in Q1. Ex-Energy: +3.7% vs +9.8%.
  • IT (+9.3%) and Financials (+7.2%) are the only two sectors with above average earnings growth in Q2. Together, they are expected to grow earnings +8.2% on average, down from +9.5% expected one week ago and from +18.8% in Q1. IT EPS are boosted by Semis results; +3.2% ex-Semis in Q2.
  • The 6 consumer-centric sectors are seen growing EPS only 0.6% in Q2, down from +2.4% one week ago.

image

The earnings tailwind is slowing considerably and its breadth is getting very narrow and erratic. Overall guidance looks good but also lacks breadth. Of the 37 positive guidance so far in Q2, 27 are from IT and HC, 14 of which are from 2 sub-sectors of IT and HC.

Ex It and HC, guidance is 46 negative and 10 positive, unchanged from last week; the 82% negative ratio compares with 85% at the same time in Q1’17 and 80% at the same time in Q2’16, so essentially in line with recent experience.

What Profit? Anemia Worsens in S&P 500 as Economy’s Bounty Thins

From Bloomberg Briefs:

The S&P 500 just posted a third quarter of year-over-year earnings growth. But in the shadow of the rebound is a trend that has been worsening for more than two years: a rising number of profitless companies.

About 10 percent of stocks in the benchmark gauge have posted losses in the last 12 months, an uncharacteristically large portion that has no precedent since 2010, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

What’s to blame? Energy companies are a culprit, unsurprisingly. Of bigger concern are technology and consumer stocks that have crept onto the list. Overall, the 51 companies lost $55 billion over the last year. When the market peaked in 2007, the figure was $22 billion. (…)

Trailing 12-month earnings in the S&P 500 total about $986 billion, or $113 a share, just below an all-time high reached in 2014. Take out the companies losing money and the total hits $1.04 trillion, or $117, the highest ever. (…)

But while $4-a-share of profits across 51 companies might not scream bear market, it doesn’t exactly comport with bull market standards either. It’s the widest gap between the two metrics since 2011. And it’s almost double the number of stocks without earnings just three years ago.

Among those shares, 23 are energy stocks, and they’re responsible for some of the biggest losses. Hess Corp. lost $19 a share in the past year as Chesapeake Energy lost $4.80. In total, energy companies were responsible for $34 billion of losses in the last year.

That leaves $21 billion in losses among the other industry groups. While tech shares weren’t the biggest losers by dollar amount, they do make up some of the notable cash-burners. Autodesk Inc. lost $2.45 a share. Yahoo! Inc., Qorvo Inc. and Symantec Corp. also landed in the red this past year.

Investors’ perception of unprofitable companies varies greatly by industry. While the shares of the money-losing energy stocks have taken a beating, quite the opposite is true for the tech stocks. Instead, tech shares without earnings are up an average 32 percent in the last year. (…)

S&P 500 Climbing Mountains

Ed Yardeni:

(…) I remain bullish. My long-held concern is that the bull market might end with a melt-up that sets the stage for a meltdown. The latest valuation and flow-of-funds data certainly suggest that the melt-up scenario may be imminent, or underway. Consider the following:

(1) Valuation melt-up. The Buffett Ratio is back near its record high of 1.81 during Q1-2000. It is simply the US equity market capitalization excluding foreign issues divided by nominal GDP. It rose to 1.69 during Q4-2016. It is highly correlated with the ratio of the S&P 500 market cap to the aggregate revenues of the composite. This alternative Buffett Ratio rose to 2.00 during Q1 of this year, matching the record high during Q4-1999. It is also highly correlated with the ratios of the S&P 500 to both forward revenues per share and forward earnings per share. All these valuation measures are flashing red.

(2) ETF melt-up. The net fund flows into US equity ETFs certainly confirms that a melt-up might be underway. Over the past 12 months through April, a record $314.8 billion has poured into these funds. That was led by funds that invest only in US equities, with net inflows of $236.4 billion, while US-based ETFs that invest in equities around the world attracted $78.4 billion in net new money over the 12 months through April.

(…)  the shift of funds from actively managed funds to passive index funds is significant and could be contributing to the melt-up. That’s especially likely since money is pouring into S&P 500 index funds, which are market-cap weighted. This may partly explain why big cap stocks, like the FAANGs, are outperforming assuming that money is coming out of mutual funds that are underweight the outperforming FAANGs.

(3) FAANG-led melt-up. The market cap of the FAANGs is up 41.4% y/y to a record $2.49 trillion, while the market cap of the S&P 500 is up 14.3% to $20.95 trillion over the same period. The FAANGs account for 27.8% of the $2.6 trillion increase in the value of the S&P 500 over the past year. The FAANG stocks now account for 11.9% of the S&P 500’s market capitalization, up from 5.8% on April 26, 2013. Collectively, over this period, they’ve accounted for $1.6 trillion of the $6.9 trillion increase in the S&P 500! Their collective forward P/E is now 27.1 and 42.8 with and without Apple, respectively. The S&P 500’s forward P/E is 17.7 and 16.9 with and without the FAANGs. These elephants continue to sprint up mountains, leading the market’s bulls, even though the air is getting thinner.

  • Watch Out for FANG Inc. Earnings estimates for Facebook, Amazon, Netflix and Alphabet haven’t kept up with their share-price gains.

The four tech giants have added $343 billion in market capitalization since the start of 2017, a gain of 27% versus a gain of 8.6% for the S&P 500. (…) Indeed, if the four tech giants were one big company—let’s call it FANG Inc.—that company’s multiple would have risen to 39 times 2017 earnings estimates from 32 times 2017 earnings estimates at the end of 2016. (…)

Earnings estimates for Facebook for this year and next are up 18% and 10%, respectively, since the beginning of this year. The company’s shares are up an even greater 30%. Similarly, the 28% rise in Netflix’s stock price exceeds its respective 11% and 2% gains in earnings estimates for this year and next. Expectations for Alphabet’s earnings for the two years have climbed only 3% and 4% over the period as its shares have climbed 22%.

For Amazon, where investors tend to focus more on cash flow than earnings, shares have shot upward even as earnings estimates have fallen by a quarter. (…)

Mutual funds and exchange-traded funds focused on technology have had inflows of $6 billion year to date—the highest of any sector—compared with $2 billion of outflows during the entirety of 2016, according to Goldman Sachs. Actively managed funds are 32% overweight the information technology and internet and catalog retail sectors, according to Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Driving that, the bank says, is their 71% overweight position in Facebook, Amazon, Netflix and Alphabet. (…)

(…) Amazon already accounts for 43 per cent of US online sales, and its market share in Germany and the UK is above one-quarter and growing. The company has captured 31 per cent of the cloud services market. Its Alexa voice platform is also spreading fast.

The company’s wealth and willingness to tolerate losses make it a formidable competitor in any arena it chooses to enter. Antitrust regulators usually focus on immediate consumer detriment. But in this case they should also take heed of the company’s long term wider impact on competition and choice. (…)

Technology Shares Lead Global Declines Shares of technology companies fell around the world, building on Friday’s steep declines in the U.S. giants that had been driving this year’s stock market gains.

The Stoxx Europe 600 dropped 0.9%, held back by a 3.7% drop in the tech sector. (…) In Europe Monday, every company in the technology sector was trading in negative territory, with the sector poised for its worst decline in nearly a year. Shares of semiconductor manufacturer AMS, 3-D sensors maker STMicroelectronics and the U.K.’sDialog Semiconductor fell 11.6%, 8.4% and 6.6%, respectively. Europe’s technology sector had also gained 16% so far this year, echoing the rally in its U.S. peers. (…)

Regional banks may keep lagging without Washington lift A rough few months for most U.S. bank stocks has been particularly unkind to regional banks, and that’s not likely to change soon as hopes dim for higher long-term interest rates and timely policy relief from Washington.

(…) After outperforming larger banks in the wake of the Nov. 8 U.S. Presidential election, the S&P 600 index .SPSMCBKS of small cap banks are down 8.1 percent so far this year, data through Thursday showed, while the S&P 500 index of the biggest U.S. banks .SPXBK is unchanged. The full S&P 500 .SPX, meanwhile, is up 8.7 percent.

Last year, investors bet heavily that smaller, entirely U.S.-focused banks would benefit most from Donald Trump’s promises of tax cuts, deregulation and economic stimulus.

But those hopes dwindled dramatically as it became clear that President Trump would have difficulty gaining enough support to deliver on any of his pro-growth proposals. (…)

Fading hopes for an economic boost from Trump’s agenda has compressed the gap between short- and long-term interest rates, putting pressure on bank loan profit margins. (…)

Also, commercial and industrial loan growth has slowed this year after climbing steadily since late 2010. The Federal Reserve’s latest Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey, released May 8, showed domestic banks reporting weaker commercial and industrial loan demand from firms of all sizes in the first quarter. (…)

JPMorgan analysts on Thursday scaled back their forecast on the size of possible U.S. tax cuts and pushed out the timing to the second quarter of 2018 from the third quarter of 2017. (…)

INTERESTING CHARTS

From Ed Yardeni:

image
image
image
CETERIS NON PARIBUS:
Thumbs down Trump’s Economic Agenda Is Almost Dead A once-in-a-generation opportunity is slipping away.
Thumbs up Trump Knows Exactly What He’s Doing: Tom Barrack on the President