The enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it’s the illusion of knowledge (Stephen Hawking)

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so (Mark Twain)

Invest with smart knowledge and objective odds

NEW$ & VIEW$ (27 MAY 2014)

Lightning CHINA CONTRACTING?

Here’s the dark view from Kyle Bass (via Zerohedge and Robert Huebscher, originally posted at Advisor Perspectives).

China’s economy isn’t just slowing down, according to Bass: It’ contracting. While China’s published rates for annual growth are still positive, Bass said the nation’s economic growth was negative from the fourth quarter of 2013 to the first quarter of 2014.

That is a result of excessive government spending on unproductive sectors of the economy. Bass said the People’s Bank of China (PBoC) has been more aggressive in its quantitative easing (QE) that the Federal Reserve has, but much of that money has gone into unproductive credit expansion.

China’s banking assets have grown to over 100% of its GDP in the last three years, according to Bass. If the U.S. had engaged in similar policies – which he said would translate to $17 trillion in lending over that time period – it, too, would have achieved more than 7% GDP growth.

China’s banking assets now total approximately $25 trillion, or almost three times the size of its $9 trillion economy. Its low default rate on bank loans – about 1% – is about to rise, according to Bass. Much of that lending is construction-related. Bass said that 55% of China’s GDP growth has been in the construction sector. The marginal return on those loans must be very small, he argued.
“A rolling loan gathers no loss,” Bass said, “and that’s what’s been going on in China for the last few years.” He said it is impossible to believe China could “manipulate” the inputs of its financial system without losing control of the outcomes.

Deflation is also threatening China. Bass said that its GDP deflator is now below zero. He expects the PBoC to engineer a devaluation of the renminbi as a way to stimulate exports and avert further deflation.

Bass said that if non-performing loans go from 1% to historical norms “somewhere in the teens” with loss severities of 100% for the worst loans, then China would delete its $4 trillion of foreign exchange reserves. Bass implied that China would need those reserves to stabilize its banking system, though he did not say so.

China’s leaders are fully aware of the dangers its economy faces, Bass said, and they hope to slow growth in a measured fashion, including through the restructuring of its banking system. “The jury’s out whether or not they can do it,” he said. “We actually believe they might be able to do that and that GDP [growth] is just going to slow down a lot more than people expect.”

“I’m not saying it is a calamity, a disaster or it’s going to end badly for the world,” Bass said. “All I’m saying is China is slowing down a lot faster than people think, and you need to think about how to position your portfolio for this.”

Bass advised against shorting Chinese equity as a way to capitalize on his forecast. Instead, he said, investors should look at China’s trading partners – Australia, New Zealand and Brazil. Those countries will be forced to loosen their monetary policy, raising rates and creating carry-trade opportunities.

With some supporting material:

Key Chinese Industrial Commodity Prices Keep Tumbling

(…) some high frequency indicators are once again flashing warning signals. According to the ISI Group research, exports to and sales in China by US corporations have turned materially lower after remaining stable since early 2013 – indicating weakening demand. Anecdotal evidence suggests that a similar slowdown has also occurred for Japanese and euro area firms selling to China.

The most worrying indicators however are the key industrial commodity prices. Futures on iron ore sold at China’s ports fell below $100 for the first time in years.

Iron OreSober Look

And steel rebar futures on the Shanghai exchange are also continuing to fall. Some of these declines are of course related to declining construction activity.

Steel RebarSober Look

Once again, most economists do not expect a “hard landing” for PRC because the government has enormous resources to “backstop” the nation’s economy. Nevertheless, a number of indicators from China still point to persistent risks to growth.

High five Wait, wait, there is a rosier view:

Early Signs Point to Steady Growth, Stimulus in China

Tom Orlik, Bloomberg Economist:

imagePrices for steel, a key input for everything from skyscrapers to ships, were down 4.1 percent year on year Friday, an improvement from an 8.1 percent decline at the end of April. Prices for paraxylene — ubiquitous in fabrics and packaging — also continued to fall in May, though at a slower rate than in April.

That slight improvement aligns with evidence from business surveys. The flash reading from the HSBC Markit PMI came in at 49.7 in May, up from 48.3 in April and edging close to the 50 mark that separates improving from deteriorating conditions. Market News International’s index of business conditions also ticked up, rising to 55 in May from 54.6 in April.

Those signs of stabilization in the factory sector reflect better conditions for China’s exporters. Taiwan export orders, which tend to lead China’s overseas sales by several months, registered robust 8.9 percent growth in April, the highest since the end of 2012.

Market prices also provide insights on inflationary pressure. Prices for pork — a critical variable in the consumer price index — registered a pronounced increase in May, rising 8.3 percent year on year in the opening days of the month after falling in April. That should be enough to ensure a slight increase in the CPI from April’s 1.8 percent annual increase.

Despite signs of steadying growth, policy makers are still taking no chances. On a visit to Inner Mongolia last week, Premier Li Keqiang warned that the economy faced severe downward pressure and told local leaders to “remember that development is the first task”.

Monetary policy continues edging into supportive mode. An injection of 120 billion yuan by the People’s Bank of China last week saw the seven day repo rate fall to 3.1 percent Monday, down from 4 percent at the end of April. The slope of the government yield curve has flattened and the spread between AAA corporate and risk-free policy bank yields has fallen to its lowest level in three years.

Taken together, the early signs for May point to growth in industrial output stabilizing around the 8.7 percent annual rate seen in April, improvement in exports, and a moderate increase in consumer prices. Despite that, policy makers appear increasingly determined to draw a line under the economy’s deceleration.

Easier monetary conditions as a result of the central bank’s fine tuning should help bolster lending and growth in the months ahead. (BloombergBriefs)

Pointing up In case you missed it, here’s what Premier Li said last week:

China’s economy still faces “relatively big” downward pressures and timely policy fine-tuning is needed, Premier Li Keqiang was quoted by state radio as saying on Friday.

“Currently, the economy is generally stable and we see positive structural changes, but downward pressures are still large and we cannot be complacent,” Li said during a visit to the northern region of Inner Mongolia.

“We should use appropriate policy tools and pre-emptive fine-tuning in a timely and appropriate manner to help resolve financing strains for the real economy, especially small firms’ difficulties in financing and high borrowing costs,” he said.

Such policy fine-tuning should help maintain “reasonable growth” in money supply and bank credit, he said.

Everything is there:

  • The economy is not getting worse short-term, being stable at a low level.
  • Risks are mounting and downward pressures are large.
  • Wait-and-see is over. China must move pre-emptively in a timely and appropriate manner.

Money Stay tune. Action is coming.

Currency swings take toll on consumer groups and manufacturers

(…) Last year’s slide in the South African rand – along with currency weakness in Australia, Colombia, Peru and elsewhere – cost SABMiller some $400m in the year to end March, the group reported on Thursday. Mothercare meanwhile said depreciation in the rouble and other currencies would eat into the royalties they earn on international sales that now represent more than 60 per cent of group network sales.

They have joined a procession of companies warning that adverse movements in exchange rates will hit this year’s earnings. These range from consumer groups, such as Unilever and Procter & Gamble, which are sensitive to currency swings because of their slim margins but can rapidly adjust prices, to manufacturers such as Rolls-Royce, which hedges against currency risks several years out, because of its lengthy contracts.

A year of turbulence in emerging markets currencies has proved punishing for multinationals that bet heavily on growth in the developing world to compensate for the prolonged post-crisis malaise in their home markets. The problem is especially acute for European companies, since the recent strength of sterling and the euro has exposed them to swings of some 20 per cent against some of the worst hit currencies. (…)

Yet while corporate treasurers are accustomed to hedging in major currencies, until now most have found it too expensive and impractical to protect against fluctuations in volatile and relatively illiquid emerging markets currencies that may lack developed derivatives markets. (…)

Currency Chaos in Venezuela Portends Write-Downs The highest inflation rate in the Americas and at least five currency devaluations in the past decade have turned Venezuela into a guessing game for multinational companies, which may have to take write-downs.

(…) The country’s foreign-exchange system puts companies on an uneven playing field, depending on their business. At the government’s official rate for companies that import essential goods, such as food and medicine, a U.S. dollar costs 6.3 bolivars. Companies invited by the government to participate in a middle-tier rate system can effectively buy a dollar for 10 bolivars. For companies in the next and newest tier, 50 bolivars fetch a dollar, leaving them to ponder the true value of their Venezuelan factories and inventories.

(…) companies face the quandary of which exchange rate to use when they close their books at the end of the quarter. So, investors should brace for more write-downs.

Avon Products Inc. switched to the newest government-sanctioned rate in the first quarter and took a $42 million charge, while Estée Lauder Cos. absorbed a $38 million hit. The majority of companies still are calculating asset values using more-favorable exchange rates.

Since the beginning of April, more than 100 international companies have mentioned Venezuela’s currency exchanges in their financial filings as a drag, or potential drag, on earnings, up from eight in the year-earlier period, according to data provider Morningstar.

Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Herbalife Ltd. and Energizer Holdings Inc., have said they would need to take write-downs of $235 million, $103 million and $62 million, respectively, if they revalued at the new rate. (…)

Auto makers have been especially hard hit because they lack the dollars to pay their suppliers. Fuel Systems Solutions Inc., a New York-based producer of natural-gas fuel systems for cars, didn’t sell a single part in Venezuela between October and April because car makers have been strapped for dollars, said Pietro Bersani, the company’s chief financial officer.

Ford Motor Co., which temporarily stopped local production of its Fiesta and other vehicles, moved to the mid-tier exchange rate in this year’s first quarter and booked a $310 million charge. Ford said it concluded it would need this exchange to access dollars in the future. The company declined to say if it would adopt the most recent exchange rate.

“We have received a commitment from the Venezuela government to help resolve the issues and to get our production up and running by the start of next month,” Ford said in a statement.

General Motors Co. wrote off $400 million in the first quarter, and said every 10% devaluation of the bolivar from the mid-tier rate would force another $100 million write-down. Chrysler Group LLC wrote off $129 million in the quarter, and warned “there may be significant changes to the exchange rate in future quarters.” (…)

Canada’s Inflation hits 2% for first time in two years, dampens rate-cut talk

Canada’s annual inflation rate rose to the central bank’s 2 per cent target in April for the first time in two years, Statistics Canada said on Friday, further dampening talk of a cut in interest rates.

Core inflation, which helps guide the Bank of Canada since it excludes natural gas, gasoline, fruit and vegetables and other volatile items, edged up to 1.4 per cent in April from 1.3 per cent in March, with prices rising 0.2 per cent on the month. Both figures again matched the median forecasts in a Reuters survey.

Mexico Cuts Economic Growth Forecast

Mexico on Friday cut its economic growth estimate for this year, after tepid growth in the U.S. and new taxes in Mexico led to a weaker-than-expected first quarter.

Gross domestic product is now seen expanding 2.7% in 2014, the Finance Ministry said, better than the meager 1.1% growth of last year but far from the 3.9% initially expected.

The government cut its estimate after the national statistics agency reported that the economy grew 0.28% in the January-March period from the previous quarter, below expectations. That translates into an annualized rate of 1.1% and means a modest improvement compared with the 0.13% growth in the fourth quarter.

On top of the weak external backdrop, across-the-board tax increases that came into force at the beginning of the year weighed on private consumption and business confidence. Also, the construction sector has been in recession for more than a year, with several home builders struggling under heavy debt.

EUROZONE RETAIL SALES TREND UP, FINALLY:

Domestic euro zone growth adding to recoverySource: FactSet, Eurostat. As of May 20, 2014 via Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.

SENTIMENT WATCH

(…) Stock-market bulls have stayed the course amid continued evidence of slow but steady improvement in corporate profits and the U.S. economic backdrop. Meanwhile, some say stocks look attractive in comparison to bonds paying historically low interest rates.

Skeptics point to the fact a long-awaited acceleration in economic activity has yet to emerge, and last year’s rally has left stocks less attractively valued. (…)

It’s not quite blood-red seas and locusts, but the bears are starting to get downright apocalyptic as they trot out their warnings of an imminent breakdown in the financial markets: tumbling Treasury yields; staggering small-company stocks; incinerated Internet shares; and blown-up biotechs. There’s just one problem: Transportation stocks should be crashing if the end were truly nigh. Instead, they’ve sailed through the carnage virtually unscathed. (…)

Instead, the Dow Jones Transportation Average has gained 9.3% over the past three months, on its way to an all-time high of 7986.58 on Friday — its 14th record close this year. There’s plenty to worry about given the weakness in some parts of the market, but the strength in transports sends “a very bullish message,” says Stephen Suttmeier, technical research strategist at Bank of America Merrill Lynch.

Transports have been so strong, it’s almost worrisome. Since March 2000, the S&P 500 Transport Index has gained 11% annually, more than doubling the Standard & Poor’s 500 index’s 4.1% return over that period. Because of the rally, the price of the S&P 500 transports relative to the S&P 500 has now topped the last peak reached in 1994 — 20 years ago. Transports went on to underperform the full index by 16 percentage points annually during the next six years. (…)

  • imageBUT FINANCIALS ARE NOT SUPPORTIVE

It has been an ugly year for the Financial sector.  In all three market cap ranges, stocks in the sector are underperforming their peer indices, and for all three, relative strength is at or near a 52-week low.  While stocks of all size are underperforming, large caps have been holding up the best, and as we have noted numerous times in the past, that is due in large part to the regulatory environment for the sector which tends to put the largest companies in the sector at an advantage relative to smaller rivals. (Bespoke Investment)

From Liberty Blitzkrieg blog via Zerohedge:

The retail investor is getting back into the stock market and is seemingly focused on the riskiest types of shares; unlisted penny stocks. They aren’t just dipping their toes in either, the pace exceeds that of the tech boom of the late 1990?s and has just hit the highest amount on record.

(…) The investors are buying up so-called penny stocks—shares of mostly tiny companies that aren’t listed on major U.S. exchanges—at a pace that far eclipses the tech boom of the late 1990s. Those include firms that focus on areas from medical marijuana and biotechnology to fuel-cell development and precious-metals mining—industries that are perceived by some investors as carrying strong growth potential.

Average monthly trading volume at OTC Markets Group Inc., which handles trading in shares that aren’t listed on the New York Stock Exchange or Nasdaq Stock Market, has risen 40% this year in dollar terms from a year ago, to a record $23.5 billion. (…)

The rebound also comes as individual investors are showing signs of increased interest in stock trading in general.Discount brokers TD Ameritrade Holding Corp. and E*Trade Financial Corp. last month reported jumps in daily trading volume in the first quarter from the same period a year ago. (WSJ)

Chinese Ship Sinks Vietnamese Fishing Boat Territorial tensions in Asia continue to rise…
APPARENTLY, THIS LEFTY IS NOT RIGHT

Piketty Book on Inequality Has Errors, Financial Times Says

Thomas Piketty, author of a best- selling book on the widening gap between rich and poor, relied on faulty data that skewed his conclusions, the Financial Times reported on its web site.

NEW$ & VIEW$ (23 MAY 2014)

Conference Board Leading Economic Index Increased in April

The index rose 0.4 percent to 101.4 percent. March was revised up 0.1 percent the two previous months were revised down 0.1 percent (2004 = 100).

Click to View

Click to View

No signs of recession yet.

U.S. HOUSING
Existing-Home Sales Rise

Sales of existing homes rose 1.3% in April to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.65 million, the National Association of Realtors said Thursday. That was slightly lower than a 4.68 million rate forecast by economists surveyed by The Wall Street Journal and was 6.8% lower their year-ago level.

The uptick followed a rise in the trade group’s March tally of pending home sales, which typically precede existing home sales by one or two months and signaled a rebound for the sector after a harsh winter. The coming months are crucial for the U.S. housing market because families traditionally prefer to move to a home in a new school district by the end of the summer.

Existing home sales were down Y/Y for the sixth straight month. Inequality is obvious in the housing market:

Sales of move-up and luxury homes continue to outperform the composite national trends in April. While overall home sales were down 6.8% y/y, sales of homes priced between $500,000-1,000,000 increased 0.8% y/y and sales of $1+ million homes increased 5.2% y/y. In total, these segments account for 11.5% of the market. Meanwhile, sales of homes under $250,000 (representing 61.4% of the market) fell 7.2% y/y. Importantly, 32% of all sales in April were “all-cash” transactions (normally less than 10%, down from 33% in March), indicating that investors and other affluent households still remain a critical component of current housing demand. (Raymond James)

Interestingly,

April listed inventory increased 16.8% from the prior month to 2.29 million for-sale homes (up 6.5% y/y). We note that the historical March-to-April inventory patterns show average listings typically fall 0.1% (dating back to 1990).

To be monitored. Meanwhile, more on inequality in housing:

Why Housing Isn’t As Cheap as It Looks

(…) The National Association of Realtors’ housing affordability index shows that housing is still more affordable than anytime between the early 1990s and 2008. What’s not to like?

The problem is that this picture of affordability assumes borrowers have down payments of at least 20% and that they’re able to qualify for the lowest mortgage rates. A new analysis from Goldman Sachs shows that for marginal borrowers, including many first-time buyers, the picture of affordability is only so-so. (The Journal raised a similar point in an Outlook column this past March.)

May I humbly say, just for the record, that I wrote about this in June 2013 (Facts & Trends: U.S. Housing A House Of Cards?)…

“While focusing on the median family is one way of gauging housing affordability, another way is to focus on the marginal buyer who is arguably more relevant for determining house prices,” write Goldman economists Marty Young and Hui Shan. “Put differently, the prices that we observe should be determined by how much the marginal buyer is willing and able to pay.”

Marginal borrowers differ from the median borrower in two key ways: Their incomes aren’t as strong, and their credit isn’t as good.

To the latter point, many marginal borrowers are taking out loans backed by the Federal Housing Administration, which allows down payments of just 3.5% and where lenders are more willing to approve borrowers without perfect credit scores. The FHA, however, has repeatedly raised the insurance premiums that borrowers must pay, which means mortgage rates for these borrowers are higher than those used to gauge affordability for the market as a whole.

FHA policies, in other words, have raised financing costs for first-time homebuyers relative to what borrowers with larger down payments would find in the market. While the average 30-year fixed-rate mortgage stood at 4.47% in February, the effective rate paid by FHA borrowers, once premiums and other costs are baked in, stood at around 5.65%, according to Goldman.

The NAR index shows that homebuyers’ monthly mortgage payments account for less than 15% of their monthly income—putting housing affordability at very favorable levels. But Goldman constructed a separate index to measure affordability for marginal buyers, and it found that the payment-to-income ratio is closer to its historical average of 23%. In other words, housing isn’t a screaming deal for marginal buyers, which could go a long way toward explaining their absence from the housing market right now.

This next chart shows a similar picture. While housing affordability has improved recently for the market as a whole, it’s actually gotten worse for marginal buyers.

The Goldman analysts don’t think the NAR’s index is wrong. “Different measures simply answer different questions,” they write. And using an index that focuses on marginal buyers shows that “housing is not as affordable as it looks.”

Canada: Sales of high-end real estate soaring

CHINA HOUSING
Rainbow What China Property Crash? Economists See Growth Bump

China’s biggest homebuilding slump in at least four years isn’t enough to dissuade a majority of economists from predicting real estate will still contribute to 2014 growth. Property controls will be eased, they said in a Bloomberg News survey.

While 12 of 18 economists say China has some national oversupply of housing, only seven say the market is in a bubble state countrywide, according to the survey conducted from May 15 to May 20. Half see bubbles in some cities, and a majority says the loosening of restrictions on home purchases and loans will be limited to a regional level. (…)

Five of 17 respondents said the property market will make a net contribution to growth this year of 1 to 2 percentage points, while four said it would add less than 1 point and one analyst projected more than 2 points. Four people said there would be a drag of 1 to 2 points and two projected a subtraction of less than 1 point.

Next year, 10 economists see a net contribution to growth, while five expect a drag.

The nation’s housing market won’t crash like that of the U.S., Japan and Hong Kong, the official Xinhua News Agency said in an article published May 21 that called people forecasting such an outcome “doom mongers.” China will have strong housing demand because of continuing urbanization, speculative buying is less prevalent than it was in Hong Kong and mortgage debt as a proportion of GDP is lower than it was in the U.S., Xinhua said. (…)

While a majority of respondents said China has an oversupply of housing, three said the current national supply is in balance with demand, even if some cities are facing issues, while two said the current supply is too small to meet demand.

Not everyone is optimistic. Moody’s Investors Service this week revised its credit outlook for Chinese developers to negative from stable. Ren Zeping, a researcher at the State Council’s Development Research Center, said economic growth may slow to about 5 percent in two to three years, the state-run Shanghai Securities News reported yesterday. (…)

Ghost From the FT’s Lex column:

(…) Double the amount of land has been sold within China in the past three years than in 2007, 2008, and 2009 – when China’s local governments financed one of the great fiscal stimuluses in history with the proceeds. No stimulus in sight now; just urban residential floor space under construction of 5.7bn square metres at the end of 2013, five times annual sales.

These figures are perturbing. Goldman, which sees a two-year property downturn, thinks that volumes will drop 15 per cent, with a fifth of book value destroyed in developers. Scary? Yes.

But the trigger of the downturn may well be liberalisation of interest rates. As investment opportunities that pay market rates within China (hello, Yu’e Bao) grow, property loses its former cachet. Bad for small and unlisted developers who rely on domestic funding. Indifferent for listed ones that finance overseas: China Overseas Land borrowed US dollars for 6 per cent for 10 years last month. It trades at 1.4 times book; Goldman thinks the sector may trough at 1 times. But the top 20 developers have only a fifth of the market in China – or markets, given over 200 cities.

Hmmm…not good for China’s overall economy, a big part of which is tied to housing trends. And what about hard commodities? Lightning

Pointing up Li is getting more worried:

China says economy faces pressure, policy fine-tuning needed

China’s economy still faces “relatively big” downward pressures and timely policy fine-tuning is needed, Premier Li Keqiang was quoted by state radio as saying on Friday.

“Currently, the economy is generally stable and we see positive structural changes, but downward pressures are still large and we cannot be complacent,” Li said during a visit to the northern region of Inner Mongolia.

“We should use appropriate policy tools and pre-emptive fine-tuning in a timely and appropriate manner to help resolve financing strains for the real economy, especially small firms’ difficulties in financing and high borrowing costs,” he said.

Such policy fine-tuning should help maintain “reasonable growth” in money supply and bank credit, he said.

World Trade Flows Fall World trade flows fell in the first three months of 2014, another indication that a sustained and broad-based pickup in global economic growth remains out of reach more than five years after the start of the financial crisis.

The Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, also known as the CPB, Friday said the volume of world exports and imports in March was 0.5% lower than in February. For the first quarter as a whole, trade flows were down 0.8% on a quarterly basis, after a rise of 1.5% in the final three months of last year.

During the first quarter, exports from developing economies in Asia recorded the largest decline, a drop of 4.5%. Central and Eastern Europe was the only region to record a rise in exports.

Asian developing economies also recorded the largest drop in imports, while Japan recorded what the CPB termed “a remarkable increase,” or a jump of 4.5%. That was likely linked to high levels of consumer spending ahead of an April increase in the country’s sales tax, which also boosted economic growth during the period.

According to the CPB, exports from and imports to the U.S. also fell during the quarter, while trade flows to and from the euro zone were little changed. (…)

SENTIMENT WATCH

It Is Really Quiet Out There Summer doldrums have arrived early on Wall Street. Major U.S. stock indexes have barely budged this month, fear has nearly vanished from the markets and few are anticipating anything to significantly change anytime soon.

[image]Traders cite a financial outlook that is widely perceived to pose little risk of an economic or market downturn: near-record stock prices, low interest rates, steady if unspectacular U.S. growth and expansive if receding Federal Reserve support for the economy and financial markets. (…)

Over the past three months, the S&P 500’s spread between its intraday high and intraday low is less than 5%, the narrowest trading range since October 2006, according to Bespoke Investment Group. Since 1984, there have only been six other instances in which the S&P 500 has traded in such a narrow range over a three-month period. (…)

And the CBOE’s Volatility Index, or VIX, dropped to as low as 11.68 Thursday, a 14-month low. The market’s so-called fear gauge is calculated from the prices investors are willing to pay for options tied to the S&P 500.

The VIX, which is widely viewed as a proxy for the stock market’s capacity for sudden spikes and plunges, remains well below its long-run average of around 20.

I don’t know about your neck of the woods but it ain’t looking like summer here just yet… And it’s not so quiet in other parts of the world: Putin Says Ukraine in Full-Scale Civil War Before Vote