The enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it’s the illusion of knowledge (Stephen Hawking)

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so (Mark Twain)

Invest with smart knowledge and objective odds

NEW$ & VIEW$ (6 OCTOBER 2014)

Still on vacation. This is from Panglao Island in the Philippines.

Job Growth Rebounds, but Wages Lag The U.S. unemployment rate slipped below 6% for the first time since the recession as hiring returned to a strong pace, lifting hopes for an economy that continues to show sluggish wage growth and persistent underemployment.

Employers added 248,000 jobs in September, rebounding from a weak August, the Labor Department said Friday. Payrolls have expanded an average 227,000 a month this year, putting 2014 on track to be the strongest year of job growth since the late 1990s.

The jobless rate fell two-tenths of a percentage point to 5.9%, the lowest level since July 2008, continuing a slide that partly reflects a shrunken labor force. Unemployment, nearly five years after surging to 10% in the wake of the recession, is moving closer to the 5.2%-5.5% range the Federal Reserve expects to see in the long run. (…)

The labor-force participation rate—reflecting the share of working-age Americans who have a job or are looking for one—fell last month to a three-decade low of 62.7%. Before the recession it stood at 66%. (…)

Among private-sector workers, average hourly earnings actually fell a penny last month, to $24.53. They have risen 2% over the past year. (…)

Last month’s job growth was broad-based, with professional and businesses services such as accounting and engineering leading the way, followed by construction, retail and health care. Manufacturing was largely flat for the second straight month. (…)

  • U.S. Jobless Claims Fall by 8,000 The number of new applications for unemployment benefits fell again last week, the latest sign layoffs are declining amid a generally improving economy.

Lately, financial media, including the WSJ, have become pretty lazy and superficial in their coverage of the financial news. The WSJ’s piece above on September’s employment report failed to mention that August and July numbers were substantially revised upward, +31k to 243k for July and +38k to 180k for August original dismal 142k number. This is 69k more jobs in two months.

The WSJ also considered inconsequential the fact that the Household survey showed a 671k jump in full-time jobs for a 12-m total of +2.4M vs a 62k drop in part-time jobs over the same 12-m period.

Also significant and not mentioned is that the 25-34 years old Americans are now over the 2007-08 hump and growing nicely in 2014. The U.S. economy needs them working so they can form households, buy new homes, new furniture, new cars, etc. According to the Household survey, this age group saw its employment grow 2.5% Y/Y vs 1.6% for total household employment. In fact, this age group got 33% of all new jobs in the past year! Maybe not the highest salaries, but salaries nonetheless.

image

Finally on the little noticed but important stuff, the average workweek finally crossed the 34.5 hours last month. Mrs. Yellen certainly took notice.

image

Island with a palm tree This was a very solid, wide ranging employment report. Heck, I’m on vacation, on a beach in the Philippines with slow internet and I’m able to write about these things with content depth and charts. Why can’t other well staffed media do the same?

Challenger Job Cut Announcements Move Lower; Hiring Surges

The outplacement firm of Challenger, Gray & Christmas reported that job cut announcements declined to 30,477 (-24.4% y/y) during September, the lowest level since June 2007. (…) During the last ten years there has been a 62% correlation between the level of job cut announcements and the m/m change in payroll employment.

image

Challenger also samples firms’ hiring plans. They surged to 567,705 (27.7% y/y) due to seasonal jumps in the transportation and retail industries, as well as gains in the government, media, automotive, computer and electronics sectors. These were offset by declines in industrial goods, insurance, consumer products, entertainment/leisure, financial, food and health care industries.

Punch David Rosenberg did mention the hiring surge in his daily note Friday, but failed to qualify it with the obvious and very meaningful seasonality…

U.S. Light Vehicle Sales Give Back the August Surge

September sales of light vehicles fell back to 16.43 million units (SAAR) from 17.53 million in August. The decline retraced most of the August jump to the 2006 high, and left unit sales up 5.8% since December.

Auto sales in September declined 8.2% (-0.3% y/y) to 7.74 million units, the lowest level since April. Sales of domestically-produced autos fell 9.2% (+3.8% y/y) to 5.63 million while sales of imports dropped 5.6% (-9.8% y/y) to 2.12 million.

Light truck sales fell 4.5% (+13.6% y/y) to 8.69 million units. Nevertheless, they remained just off September’s expansion high. Sales of domestically-produced light trucks were off 4.5% (+15.0% y/y) to 7.54 million and imported light truck sales fell 4.6% (+4.9% y/y) to 1.15 million.

I continue to suggest that we may well have seen the cyclical peak in car sales (chart from CalculatedRisk)

Manufacturers are turning cautious. Scheduled Q4 U.S. vehicle production is off 6.3% QoQ Annualized after surging 17.2% and 16.5% in Q2 and Q3 respectively.

Factory Expansion Takes a Breather The U.S. factory sector’s expansion slowed a bit in September from its breakneck pace in August, with manufacturers focused on boosting output with only modest hiring.

The Institute for Supply Management said Wednesday its manufacturing index, based on a survey of purchasing managers, slipped to 56.6 last month from an August reading of 59, which had been the highest since March 2011. (…)

The ISM survey said some respondents noted the shortage of labor as a detriment to business. One manager in the machinery industry said in the ISM survey, “Our search continues for good machinists and electrical engineers.”

Rental Rates Tick Up; Vacancy Flat Rental rates at malls and strip shopping centers ticked up slightly in the third quarter, but vacancy rates remained flat.

Asking rents at regional malls rose 0.5% in the quarter to $40.51 a square foot, up 1.8% from a year earlier, according to data released Thursday by real-estate research company Reis Inc. Mall vacancies remained at 7.9% for the fourth quarter in a row.

Strip centers saw rents rise 0.4% in the quarter to $17.06 a square foot, up 1.8% from a year earlier. Third-quarter vacancy remained unchanged from the previous quarter at 10.3%, slightly lower than the average vacancy rate of 10.74% over the past five years.

The numbers are a sign of continued pain in the retail real estate market. Prices have risen quickly for the highest-quality assets, including the largest, most productive malls and boutique spaces on main thoroughfares in big cities, but they remain sluggish for more run-of-the-mill properties in less attractive locations.

The pace of construction of new shopping centers is also close to a record low, Reis said. Retail landlords have added 3.99 million square feet of new shopping centers so far this year, including 1.3 million in the third quarter.

The previous low was set in 2010, when builders added 4.5 million square feet over the whole year.

“We used to build about 2,000 shopping centers a year in this country. Now it’s just a few hundred,” said David Henry, the chief executive of Kimco Realty Corp., a shopping-center owner based in New Hyde Park, N.Y.

Here’s the chart from CalculatedRisk:

U.S. Trade Gap Narrowed in August The U.S. trade gap narrowed in August as exports increased, a sign of stronger foreign demand for American-made goods that could help boost economic growth in the just-ended third quarter.

Exports increased 0.2% from July to $198.46 billion, and imports rose 0.1% to $238.57 billion. Exports rose 4.1% in August from a year earlier, and imports rose 3.7% on the year.

EMU Retail Sales Perk Up

Euro area retail sales in August snapped back sharply, rising by 1.2% after falling by 0.4% in July. The three-month performances boosted the growth rate to 4.9%, up from 0.6% over six months and 0.6% over 12 months. The growth of nonfood items stepped back up in August; its trends, the sequential growth rates, show some acceleration as well. Motor vehicle registrations are quite volatile and fell by 1.1% in August after a 4.6% increase in July and a 4.4% decline in June. The balance of these effects leaves a negative three-month growth rate -2.6%, down from 10.3% over six months and 4.9% year-over-year. Still, because of volatility, it’s hard to conclude that motor vehicle registrations are slipping with any degree of certainty.

Retail sales volume figures across some selected European Union and European Monetary Union members, shows us gains for all those countries listed in the table in August. Germany and Portugal show double-digit gains and reveal that sales acceleration is in place in both countries. Sweden’s growth, at 5.2% over three months, is also part of an ongoing acceleration. Austria’s 1.2% three-month growth rate is also better than its six month and 12-month growth rates, but the pattern is not as reliable as for other countries showing acceleration. In the U.K., three-month growth is at 2.3%, part of a gradual slowdown from 4% over 12 months to 3.2% over six months to 2.3% over three months. In Denmark, the negative growth of 0.4% over three months is also part of an ongoing slowdown from 12 months to six months to three months. However, Denmark also has sales gains back-to-back in July and August that for the moment are being swamped by a 0.7% drop in June; so its deteriorating pattern may not be set in stone.

large image

Here’s the data. Note that the non-food part remains pretty sluggish.

High five This was for August. Here’s a preview for September from Markit:

Lightning Downturn in eurozone retail sector continues as sales drop for third straight month

September saw a solid and accelerated decrease in eurozone retail sales, the latest PMI® figures from Markit showed. The rate of decline was the sharpest since April 2013, reflecting deepening downturns in trade in both Germany and France. Sales also continued to fall in Italy, though the rate of decline was the slowest in five months.

At 44.8, down from 45.8 in August, the headline Markit Eurozone Retail PMI – which tracks month-on-month changes in like-for-like retail sales – pointed to a third straight monthly decrease in retail sales in the euro area. The rate of was the fastest since April 2013 when measured on both month-on-month and annual bases.

image

Like actual sales, retailers’ buying levels decreased for the third straight month in September, and at a faster rate than in August. Inventories continued to build, however, as firms missed their targets. September’s shortfall in sales relative to plans was in fact the most marked in 18 months.

This augurs pretty badly for the all-important Christmas season…

This won’t help either. Europe is not out of the woods.

image

Global recovery is stalling, says index IMF expected to cut estimate of 2014 growth to little over 3%

(…) The IMF is expected to cut its estimate of global growth in 2014 from 3.4 per cent to a little over 3 per cent this week as poor second quarter figures from Germany, Japan and other countries weigh on the outlook. As recently as April, the IMF was expecting 3.6 per cent growth this year, faster than the long-term average. (…)

Some other indicators of economic activity are more upbeat. A composite measure of the purchasing managers’ indices for the global economy, compiled by JPMorgan, showed a reasonably high level of growth momentum in September. Rob Dobson, of JPMorgan said if the figures translated into real output, the implied third quarter rise in global gross domestic product was “the best growth outcome since the second quarter of 2010”.

 image

Fingers crossed Will OPEC save the day for everybody with a big global tax cut right on time for year-end shopping?

OPEC Rifts Set Off Price War Discord at OPEC is turning into a price war, loosening the cartel’s grip on oil markets and exacerbating a recent steep selloff.

(…) “No one is telling anyone what they are up to,” one Gulf oil official said.

Saudi Arabia this week unilaterally lowered the price it charges for crude scheduled for delivery next month—without the typical consultation with other members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, according to OPEC officials. The decision surprised many market watchers, who were expecting the Saudis to cut output to help boost prices, and sent prices hurtling lower. (…)

The Saudi decision followed a similar move by the kingdom and Kuwait to lower prices for delivery this month, without informing other OPEC members, according to OPEC officials, effectively undercutting fellow members. (…)

Recent turmoil across the Middle East has scrambled long-held political alliances among some of the group’s most important members. (…)  Many inside and outside the organization doubt whether the group can do much amid its current disarray.

The drop in prices is particularly worrying for OPEC producers in Latin America and Africa that depend on oil revenue to support high spending, as well as Iran, where trade is crimped by international sanctions.

(…) OPEC members are sitting on unused pumping capacity of some 3.8 million barrels a day, equivalent to 4% of global oil supplies, according to the International Energy Agency—spare capacity that could generally be called upon quickly in a pinch. (…)

Last month, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait both cut their October prices for Asian buyers, according to Gulf oil officials and traders, effectively undercutting the U.A.E., a Persian Gulf neighbor and fellow OPEC member. In the past, such cuts would have been taken collectively among Arab Gulf OPEC members. (…)

OPEC’s recent woes have their roots in an unusually public row in 2011. Faced with tight supplies and rising prices amid the political turmoil of the Arab Spring, Saudi Arabia’s longtime oil minister Ali al-Naimi pushed at one meeting to boost production. Delegates failed to agree, and Mr. Naimi stormed out, telling reporters it was “one of the worst meetings we ever had.”

Riyadh boosted production on its own. Since then, the Arab Spring has deepened fault lines between some member governments and created new fissures.

Arab Gulf OPEC members—Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar and the U.A.E. have long been aligned politically, largely in opposition to neighbor and OPEC colleague Iran. That rivalry has intensified as proxy wars have raged in Iraq and Syria.

At the same time, the Gulf Arab alliance has frayed. Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the U.A.E., for instance, have all backed different factions in the various uprisings that have raged across the Middle East. (…)

image

EARNINGS WATCH
Higher EPS Estimate Cuts in Q3 Relative to Recent Averages, But Below Long-Term Average

Over the course of the third quarter, analysts have lowered earnings estimates for companies in the S&P 500 for the quarter. The Q3 bottom-up EPS estimate  dropped 4.2% (to $29.06 from $30.33) from June 30 through September 30.

During the past year (4 quarters), the average decline in the EPS estimate during the quarter has beenv3.2%. During the past five years (20 quarters), the average decline in the EPS estimate during thevquarter has been 2.7%. During the past ten years, (40 quarters), the average decline in the EPS estimate during the quarter has been 4.5%. Thus, the decline in the EPS estimate recorded during the course of the Q3 2014 quarter was larger than both the trailing 1-year and 5-year averages. However, the decrease was slightly below the 10-year average.

In aggregate, earnings for the third quarter for the S&P 500 are expected to increase by 4.6% on a year-over-year basis. The estimated growth rate today is nearly half the expectation at the start of the quarter (9.0%). The decline in the growth rate can be attributed in part to Bank of America, as analysts included the impact of the company’s settlement with the DOJ in their Q3 estimates.The Energy sector has witnessed the second largest dip in expected earnings growth (to 4.0% from
11.9%) since the start of the quarter.  In addition, 82 companies in the index have guided EPS estimates lower for the quarter.

Looking at forward estimates, analysts are projecting much higher earnings growth in Q4 2014 and the first half of 2015 compared to Q3 2014. However, they are not predicting a substantial improvement in revenue growth, which implies that net margins are expected to increase in future quarters as well. (Factset)

I would expect that Energy companies will see further cuts in their estimates as oil prices have collapsed. In fact, EPS will likely decline in Q4 given that prices could be 15% lower in Q4 YoY.image

Automobile companies and most related industries should also see their estimates decline in coming weeks given the reduced production levels.

  • Earnings: The Almighty Dollar The greenback’s strength won’t dent U.S. companies’ earnings for the latest quarter but could dampen their outlooks going forward.

(…) In just the past three months, the greenback has gained 8.4% against the euro and 7.5% against the yen, big moves in the foreign-exchange market.

And some key emerging economies, for different reasons, have seen sharper slides. The Brazilian real and Russian ruble are 11.6% and 16.5% weaker, respectively, over the same period.

The good news: Currency carnage shouldn’t put a big dent in third-quarter earnings, which start trickling in this week. Management guidance may be cautious about future periods, though. (…)

This is the S&P 500 Index after Friday’s rally which brought it back over “the line”.

spy

Will the MSCI follow? (Chart from the Short Side of Long)

Equity Fund Flows
Gross sparks rate position exodus Turmoil follows exit of former Pimco man

Investors have liquidated hundreds of billions of dollars of positions in interest rate derivatives contracts, an asset class favoured by Bill Gross, in moves that traders suggested showed Pimco cashing in holdings to meet redemption demands.

The massive shift in positions marks the most visible sign yet of the market turmoil that has followed the exit of Mr Gross from Pimco and its resulting efforts to meet redemptions while other investors seek to profit from the dislocation. (…)

After Mr Gross left, Pimco said investors pulled $23.5bn from the Total Return Fund during September, a monthly record. Commodity Futures Trading Commission statistics revealed on Friday that asset managers reduced their long eurodollar futures positions by 868,853 contracts in the week to September 30 – the largest one-week change on record. Each contract has a notional value of $1m. (…)

BACKING BUYBACKS

Edward Luce’s recent front page piece in the FT (The short-sighted US buyback boom) pretty well echoes the recent bashing against buybacks and villain executives and directors.

(…) At a time of soaring profitability, US companies have piled up huge amounts of cash, much of it parked offshore. Yet investing it in long-term growth is the last thing on their mind. According to Barclays, US companies have lavished more than $500bn in the past year on stock buybacks – a multiple of what most are spending on research and development and other capital investments. In the first six months of the year, buybacks surged to $338.3bn – the largest half-yearly volume since 2007. The rationale is simple. By reducing the volume of outstanding shares, chief executive officers increase earnings per share. That in turn lifts their pay, which is heavily tied to short-term stock performance. If you need an explanation for why the top 0.1 per cent is doing so well, start with equity-based compensation.

But the impact is much broader than that. According to William Lazonick, a scholar at the University of Massachusetts Lowell, seven of the top 10 largest share repurchasers spent more on buybacks and dividends than their entire net income between 2003 and 2012. In the case of Hewlett-Packard, which spent $73bn, it was almost double its profits. For ExxonMobil, which came top with $287bn in buybacks and dividends, it amounted to 83 per cent of net income. Others, such as Microsoft (125 per cent), Cisco (121 per cent) and Intel (109 per cent) were even more extravagant. In total, the top 449 companies in the S&P 500 spent $2.4tn – or more than half their profits – on buybacks in those years. They spent almost the same again in dividend payouts. Taken together, they came to 91 per cent of net income. (…)

In the past week, consumers have gone wild over the launch of the iPhone 6. It is US innovation at its best. Will Apple still be at the cutting edge a decade from now? Not if you judge by what it does with its cash. The company keeps tens of billions of dollars offshore to avoid paying US corporate taxes. Yet it borrows at home – including a record $17bn bond issue last year – to fund a massive share buyback spree (Apple spends more on equity repurchases than any other US company). The roots of the problem lie with poor governance regulations and a badly outdated tax system. Unless these are fixed, boardrooms will keep on draining their treasuries at the expense of other stakeholders. Greed will always be with us. Dumb laws are optional.

Let’s look at the facts.

The following chart plots the proxy for the S&P 500 Index share count since 1990:

image_thumb[1]

Shares outstanding for the entire S&P500 Index are currently down 1.7% YoY. Ten companies (2% of the Index companies) dominate buybacks, accounting for 23% of the buyback value during the last 12 months. Traditional buyback to free cash flow relationships don’t matter for these ten companies as they all happen to have humongous cash reserves and pristine financial ratios. Their cash reserves earn nothing while the shares they buy back pay an annual dividend between 2.0% and 3.5%. Quite a positive carry if there is one!

Applying the weight of these 10 companies on the whole S&P Index and pretend that S&P 500 companies, overall, foolishly overspend their operating cash flows on buybacks requires total blindness, naivety, ignorance or intentional deception.

Here’s what Luce and many others fail to mention:

  • A lot of the buybacks are meant to offset option grants.
  • The ten major buybackers are also among the largest option granters.
  • Most of these companies have humongous cash piles and the decision to buyback shares has little to do with current earnings or cash flows.

image

As to the argument that corporate executives are short-term greedy and are underinvesting for the longer term, the statistical aging of the capital stock is a trend that has actually been on for almost 50 years. From my lens, the U.S. does not appear to be at the back of the class on innovation and productivity (charts from Credit Suisse).

image

And, by the way, long-term growth is not the last thing on their mind as Luce asserts. In fact capex orders have been rising swiftly in 2014 (+16.6% annualized since February) and are now exceeding the last 2 cyclical peaks.

image

This is in spite of the still pretty low capacity utilization levels which, although near its pre-recession level, it is still well below the 83-85% threshold that may be dangerous for growth and/or inflation.

image_thumb[8]

In all, corporate executives, as a group, do not appear to be shortchanging their stakeholders. Quite the opposite in fact since capacity utilization remains historically low.

Finally, the fact that large buyback companies have outperformed the overall market over the past 5 years is often used as exhibit to prove that managements are selfishly using buybacks to boost earnings per share and share prices. It may also be that these companies are outperforming in the first place because their corporate performances and financial ratios are superior, allowing directors to authorize large buybacks.