The enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it’s the illusion of knowledge (Stephen Hawking)

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so (Mark Twain)

Invest with smart knowledge and objective odds

THE DAILY EDGE: 20 SEPTEMBER 2021: More Technical Warnings

TECHNICALS WATCH

High equity valuations have been more than offset by rising earnings, low interest rates and strong technical trends. At this time, earnings and interest rates remain supportive. Many technical measures, however, have deteriorated, signalling increasing investor wariness.

Per Lowry’s Research, unlike market bottoms which are events, market peaks are generally a process developing over weeks and months. This needs a rigorous and objective analysis based on a deep knowledge and understanding of past trends.

A casual look at the S&P 500 Index triggers few worries, except perhaps one of missing this latest buy-the-dip opportunity:

spy

The fact that the equal-weighted S&P 500 has broken its 2020-21 trend may be a first warning but there is continued support from the still rising moving averages:

rsp

And the tech stalwarts remain popular:

ndx

The problems emerge with the smaller cap stocks which have been see-sawing since March and are at a critical junction with their various moving averages with only the 200dma still being supportive.

sly

iwm

In effect, leadership is getting narrower and narrower and even the appetite for the leaders is waning:

ndx

@DeanChristians tweeted this unusual breadth chart last week with this explanation: “If we count the number of days when fewer than 40% of S&P 500 members outperform the Index on a rolling 63-day basis, the indicator surpassed the longest streak in history on 9/13/21.” See the red dots?

Image

These BofA charts (via The Market Ear) show the explosion in equity inflows last week: yet, these buy-the-dips funds failed to boost equities as sellers dominated.

Selling volume has overcome buying volume in recent weeks, indicating a rising desire to own zero-return cash. TINA is apparently not quite as powerful, and not only in the USA:

acwx

China’s Evergrande Moment: Bear Stearns, LTCM, Lehman or Minsky?

(…) Will it be a Minsky Moment, akin to the Lehman collapse? Or will it be more akin to the LTCM Moment? Or might it just be altogether less momentous? To measure this we need to resuscitate another concept of which many of us thought we had heard the last more than two decades ago: Asian contagion. How much effect will Evergrande’s troubles have on the rest of us?

To define the terms: a Minsky Moment, named for the economist Hyman Minsky, happens when confidence breaks after a prolonged period of speculation. The most famous example is the Lehman Moment, which came in 2008 when Lehman Brothers went bankrupt as a result of excessive subprime lending, and the knock-on effects brought the global financial system to a standstill. An LTCM Moment is named for the implosion of the Long-Term Capital Management hedge fund in 1998, which also followed a sudden loss of confidence after a period of excessive speculation.

The difference between LTCM and Lehman lay in what the authorities did about it. After LTCM, the Federal Reserve banged the heads of creditors together to bail it out, and then cut interest rates. That sparked the last mad 18 months of the 1990s bull market. The Lehman Moment happened when the government decided not to repeat the LTCM experience, because it had created too much moral hazard — the irresponsible behavior that comes when people are sure they will be bailed out. The result was the worst U.S. market crisis in eight decades, and arguably the greatest global financial crisis ever. (…)

Yes, Evergrande is big enough to create a Minsky Moment within the Chinese market. But we should expect the response to be far more LTCM than Lehman. (…)

There is evident contagion in the real estate sector; yields of companies in other industries, including even banks, haven’t moved much, at least yet. And, as this chart produced by Societe Generale SA shows, there has been no contagion from high-yield to investment-grade debt:

relates to China’s Evergrande Moment Is Looking More LTCM Than Minsky(…) The news from the broader real estate market is terrifying. China is pockmarked with speculative properties and it isn’t at all clear that there will ever be buyers for them. This is terrible collateral.

So why is there still relative calm? It boils down to a close reading of the Chinese authorities’ intentions. They have no interest in staging their own Lehman. There has been alarm about the possibility of a Minsky moment for years in Chinese circles, frequently voiced out loud. Officials know what could happen and are determined to prevent it if they can. Efforts to rein in credit have been going on for years. And Evergrande is in trouble largely because the government itself decided to clamp down on property developers through the “three red lines” policy last year.

Governments can easily make mistakes, of course. But the Chinese plainly intend this to be more LTCM than Lehman. (…)

Another reason to expect the Chinese government to do something to ensure an orderly process is that they have no choice. To use another familiar phrase from the Lehman debacle, Evergrande is far too big to fail. (…)

A final point is that we also have an idea of the likely playbook from the failure of the smaller but even more interconnected Baoshang Bank two years ago. To quote Wei Yao of Societe Generale:

While we do think that Evergrande is systemically important, we also reckon that Chinese policymakers have the willingness, capability and knowhow to stem a financial market meltdown. On this front, the default of Baoshang Bank on its interbank liabilities in May 2019 is a good reference. Compared with Baoshang at the time of default, Evergrande has much more total debt, but similar amount of liabilities to financial institutions and in the capital markets. Also, Baoshang had more complex ties in the financial system (with over RMB300bn interbank liabilities with over 700 counterparties) and, very importantly, its default was a complete surprise.

The Baoshang episode showed, to quote Yao, that avoiding a systemic liquidity squeeze was “the absolute priority for the the People’s Bank of China” and that it had the means to do so. Policy makers are also able to buy time to make a restructuring less painful.

  • There’s a Lehman in China every 36 months Is Evergrande a Lehman event? We sincerely doubt it. It is (way) easier to contain Evergrande than Lehman, but it doesn’t mean that the Evergrande blow-up doesn’t come with repercussions. Markets will likely stay in “stagflation mode”.

(…) Contagion effects from Evergrande are likely to be decently contained and markets are yet to care about true spill-over effects in for example Country Gardens (Chinas biggest real estate developer) tradable bonds, while Chinese high yield has been selling moderately off in a broader scale. This doesn’t seem like a market truly scared of a true Lehman-like contagious meltdown scenario despite Evergrande bonds trading at a “recovery rate” of one to four or thereabout. This could be our famous last words, but we struggle to get really scared about Evergrande, but obviously one can never say never(grande).

Contagious effects from Evergrande still remain sparse in a bigger perspective

We tend to get a round of “China is melting down” with an interval of 2-3 years and they usually always occur when the Chinese credit impulse is negative. China is a credit-fuelled economy and there are always casualties when the authorities decide to take the foot of the pedal.

This was also the case in 2014/2015 and 2018 when the Chinese markets suffered markedly due to a clearly negative credit impulse and in sharp contrast to the US in 2008 Chinese authorities hold all the ammo needed to turn the tide on credit growth (if needed). They can essentially credit grow the “beep” out of everyone trying to bet against them if they want.

There’s a Lehman in China every 36 months and usually the authorities solve it

It doesn’t mean that the Evergrande/China slowdown comes without global repercussions. The global credit impulse has been (mainly) driven by China in recent years but currently we see a very uniform decelerating impulse across jurisdictions. The interesting thing is that the impulse is now clearly negative (a contraction of credit on the second derivate) likely because of a voluntary drawdown on the revolving facilities that were widely utilized during Q2/Q3-2020. In other words, credit growth is slowing fast as 1) liquidity facilities are not as needed now and 2) the impulse from the fiscal and monetary side is weakening in YoY terms. Gravity pulls.

The big question is if this is something to worry about. We think it warrants a shift in asset allocation trends away from cyclicals to defensives

In FX space, a slowing credit impulse is good news for our view that the USD will continue to perform versus European peers as Europe is clearly more interlinked with Chinese developments than the US. It likely also means that Eastern Europe FX will suffer versus EUR during the late autumn as e.g. Poland and Hungary are high beta to German performance (whatever Germany does, Poland does times 1.5).

The PMIs next week will look solid in Europe due to service sector reopening effects but that is likely also going to be the “peak” of the #Euroboom narrative. At least we don’t buy it with one single penny as Germany lags China by a bit more than a quarter and China is clearly slowing, and then we haven’t even touched upon the possibility of Powell launching a NFP-targeting tapering process already on Wednesday.

The surge in natural gas prices has helped prompt worries about stagflation, or at least about a negative impact on growth, especially in Europe (where natural gas prices have surged more than in the US). A person of a bullish persuasion would now argue, and rightly so, that rising prices may reflect strong demand, and if that’s the case there’s nothing much to worry about. But does it really?

If it on the other hand reflects green new deal-driven supply shortages, or shortages for other reasons, we may face some hiccups… (such as depressed spending and production growth). (…)

FYI: Evergrande has presold 1.4 million apartments, yet unfinished ($200B).

Natural-Gas Prices Surge, and Winter Is Still Months Away The jump in prices is prompting worries about winter shortages and forecasts for the most expensive fuel since frackers flooded the market.

(…) Europe is short of gas and coal and if the wind doesn’t blow, the worst-case scenario could play out: widespread blackouts that force businesses and factories to shut.

The unprecedented energy crunch has been brewing for years, with Europe growing increasingly dependent on intermittent sources of energy such as wind and solar while investments in fossil fuels declined. Environmental policy has also pushed some countries to shut their coal and nuclear fleets, reducing the number of power plants that could serve as back-up in times of shortages. (…)

“It will be expensive for consumers, it will be expensive for big energy users,” Dermot Nolan, a former chief executive officer of U.K. energy regulator Ofgem, said in a Bloomberg TV interview. (…)

Europe’s gas prices have more than tripled this year as top supplier Russia has been curbing the additional deliveries the continent needs to refill its depleted storage sites after a cold winter last year. (…)

Higher gas prices boosted the cost of producing electricity as renewables faltered. Low wind speeds forced European utilities to burn expensive coal, depleting stockpiles of the dirtiest of fossil fuels. Energy policy also played a role, with the cost of polluting in the European Union surging more than 80% this year.

“Gas supply is short, coal supply is short and renewables aren’t going great, so we are now in this crazy situation,” said Dale Hazelton, head of thermal coal at Wood Mackenzie Ltd. “Coal companies just don’t have supply available, they can’t get the equipment, the manufacturers are backed up and they don’t really want to invest.” (…)

“If we end up having a very cold winter in Asia as well as in Europe, then we may end up seeing a ridiculous spike in gas prices.” (…)

Europe will need to curtail demand if the winter is cold, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. said, predicting the region will face blackouts. (…)

Supplies are unlikely to improve significantly any time soon. Russia is facing an energy crunch of its own and Gazprom is directing its additional production to domestic inventories. Prices could stay high even if Europe ends up with a mild winter, said Fabian Ronningen, an analyst at energy consultant Rystad Energy AS. (…)

  • A doubling of energy prices in Europe plus the U.K. would cost consumers an extra 128 billion euros a year, equivalent to $150.6 billion, according to research by SEB. Energy makes up 9.5% of the basket of goods and services in a key eurozone inflation measure. (WSJ)
EARNINGS WATCH

While we await the start of the Q3 earnings season, we are monitoring trends in pre-announcements. In total, guidance so far looks ok, in fact somewhat better than Q2 at the same time with 3 fewer negatives.

image

The glass half empty view is that 10 fewer companies have updated their guidance and 65 are positive or in line, down from 72 at the same time in Q2. In the last week, 4 S&P 500 companies pre-announced, 1 positive, 3 negatives.

The combination of a slowing economy and rising inflation is making analysts more cautious on their earnings forecasts:

 image image
Amid COVID surge, states that cut benefits still see no hiring boost

New state-level data released Friday by the Bureau of Labor Statistics showed the group of mostly Republican led states that dropped a $300 weekly unemployment benefit over the summer added jobs in August at less than half the pace of states that retained the benefits. (…)

But some of those same states, notably Florida and Texas, are also hotbeds of opposition to government health mandates like mask wearing, and the surge of infections there in July and August appeared to dent hiring across the sorts of “close contact” businesses that have suffered most during the health crisis and had begun to recover quickly.

Overall employment in the leisure and hospitality fell about 0.5% in the 26 states that ended benefits, and rose 1% elsewhere. (…)

Economists analyzing the unemployment issue have seen little evidence yet that cutting off the benefits has provided a clear boost to local labor markets, in part because of difficulties separating the influence of the payments from larger shifts in the labor force, or of the potentially offsetting damage done by the pandemic. (…)

“The behavioral response to UI-benefit expiration remains highly uncertain due to the unprecedented size of the benefit swings and the highly unusual economic and health situation,” Goldman economist Joseph Briggs wrote on Friday.

Americans Haven’t Been This Down on Housing Market Since 1982

The share of people who think now is a good time to buy a home fell in September to 29%, extending the plunge from March when the proportion was more than twice as high, data from the University of Michigan consumer sentiment survey showed Friday. It’s also the smallest chunk of respondents since 1982.

Back then, the average for a 30-year fixed rate mortgage topped 15%. That compares with today’s 2.86% rate, according to Freddie Mac. (…)

Dwindling share say now good time to buy U.S. home, despite record-low financing

Honda Says Japan Output 60% Below Plan on Parts Shortage The Japanese automaker expects the impact to extend beyond this month and said the level of operations in early October will be about 70% of its initial plan, according to a statement on its website that notes the estimates are as of Sept. 14. The announcement comes as its bigger rival Toyota Motor Corp. on Friday outlined plans to shutter factories in October. It said 27 out of 28 lines in all of its 14 plants in Japan would face suspensions of as many as 11 days.

(…) As the semiconductor crunch persists, automakers are building closer ties with chip companies such as Intel Corp., Qualcomm Inc. and Nvidia Corp. to monitor supply.

U.S. production of new vehicles this fall will continue to be constrained by the chip shortage and the spread of Covid-19 in Southeast Asia. On Thursday, IHS Markit slashed its vehicle production forecast for this year by 6.2%, or 5.02 million vehicles, the biggest decrease to the outlook since the chip shortage emerged.

FDA panel votes against Pfizer’s Covid-19 booster jab application Advisory committee endorses third dose only for elderly and at-risk groups in blow to Biden

From the WSJ editorial board:

(…) The evidence for boosters is strong and growing. The most compelling comes from Israel, which started giving third doses in July after infections and hospitalizations started climbing among people who were vaccinated this winter. One study from Israel found that the Pfizer vaccine’s protection against symptomatic infection had fallen to 40% from mid-June to July compared to more than 95% from January to April. Those who were vaccinated in January had only 16% protection compared to 79% for those vaccinated in April. (…)

A study from the Kaiser Permanente Southern California health system found that vaccine efficacy against infection declined from 88% in the first month after full vaccination to 47% after five or more months.

Some evidence suggests that protection against severe illness is declining too. A study published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on Friday found that the Pfizer vaccine was 77% effective against hospitalization after four months versus 91% within the first 120 days.

It’s true that the evidence for boosters is stronger for older Americans who generate lower levels of antibodies after the first two doses and are at higher risk for severe illness. Pfizer’s studies showed a third dose boosted antibody counts for those over age 65 by 12-fold compared to one month after the second dose, while increasing five-fold for younger adults. A new study in the New England Journal of Medicine this week from Israel found that a third shot reduced the risk of infection for those over 60 by 11-fold and severe illness by 20-fold.

Some on the FDA advisory panel opposed boosters on grounds that the initial shots still offer sufficiently high levels of protection against severe illness for younger Americans. But many people under age 65 are still getting severely ill even if they aren’t hospitalized. Pfizer says the side effects from a third dose are no greater than for the second. (…)

By the way, the U.S. government is paying only about $20 for a vaccine dose compared to $2,100 for a monoclonal antibody treatment for somebody who gets sick. The economic cost-benefit seems to favor boosters. (…)

THE DAILY EDGE: 17 SEPTEMBER 2021

U.S. Economy Shows Resilience During Delta Surge Americans increased spending at retailers last month, while employers have largely resisted the urge to lay off workers, both signs of strong demand in the economy.

Sales at the nation’s retailers rose 0.7% in August, rebounding from a drop in July, the Commerce Department said. With many schools, college campuses and offices reopening, consumers shelled out more for groceries and merchandise at big-box stores. Those purchases—along with higher spending on furniture and hardware—offset another big decline in car sales, which have suffered from a global computer chip-shortage that has crimped supply. (…)

Sales at restaurants were flat last month after rising briskly for most of this year. Economists believe fears of Delta were a factor. Despite the August pause, restaurant sales have climbed nearly 32% over the past year. (…)

Control sales are volatile but still very strong overall. August was up 2.6% after -2.0% and +1.6% in the previous two months. Last 3 months: +9.1% annualized. So much for the “spent up” thesis.

fredgraph - 2021-09-17T062722.204

Sales, total and control, are holding up at a high level, +17.7% and +20.5% over their pre-pandemic level respectively.

fredgraph - 2021-09-17T063346.739

Retail sales trends (blue) remain well above growth in labor income (black), indicating that consumers are still inclined to dissave:

fredgraph - 2021-09-17T063855.509

The Chase card spending tracker suggest September is fairly solid so far. Typically, a strong back-to-school season precedes a jolly Christmas for retailers.

image

Best Buy Co. , Target Corp. and other large merchants are amassing more inventory compared with last year’s pandemic-depressed levels, in some cases logging double-digit percentage increases as the stockpiles also exceed 2019 values.

Covid-related factory shutdowns in Asia and global shipping bottlenecks have businesses jockeying for merchandise and vessel space to avoid losing critical fourth-quarter sales, a contest that tends to favor deep-pocketed big-box retailers over smaller competitors. (…)

Walmart’s consolidated inventories reached nearly $47.8 billion in the quarter ended July 31, a 16% increase from the year-ago period and up 8% from the same quarter in 2019. Walmart U.S. inventories were down 4.6% between the fiscal second quarter of 2021 and that of 2020, a spokesman said. (…)

The ratio of U.S. retailers’ inventories to sales fell this spring to the lowest level in U.S. Census Bureau records dating to 1992, and the measure has ticked up only slightly even as record volumes of container imports have flowed into the U.S. (…)

At the end of July, retail inventories were 15-20% below normal. Keep this in mind while you read the rest of this post.

fredgraph - 2021-09-17T064911.032

(…) “Sometimes the ocean freight now is actually more expensive than the cost of the product,” Chief Executive Officer Wade Miquelon said in a recent interview. The company hasn’t raised any base prices and is hoping the extra supply-chain expenses are temporary. “I think they probably are, but does transient mean six months or 24 months?” he said. (…)

“It has just gone up so rapidly that it is now becoming part of the narrative here of this supply-chain-driven price shock that is proving to be a lot more intense and a lot more durable than we initially thought back in the spring,” said Brian Coulton, chief economist at Fitch Ratings. (…)

Procter & Gamble Co. PG -0.70% has announced several price increases for products including Pampers diapers this year, but executives have cautioned that the speed and scope of freight and commodity-cost increases are too great to offset initially. The company is projecting $1.9 billion in added after-tax costs in its current fiscal year, which ends in June 2022. (…)

Dollar Tree warned investors last month that freight-market conditions continued to deteriorate and that costs would be “significantly higher than originally projected.” (…)

The extra costs and adjustments that have companies warning investors and working to preserve their profit margins are prompting some economists to shrug. The rebounding economy, they said, came with a surge in demand for goods, which caused a short-term supply crunch that will work itself out with time as higher prices quell demand.

“There is no more transitory price than transportation because the capacity can expand and shrink,” said Steven Blitz, chief U.S. economist at TS Lombard. Trains can get longer, more ships can be built, and truck drivers can be hired to meet the demand to move things, but it just takes some time to happen. Like many economists, Mr. Blitz expects that inflation pressures will fade. (…)

“I think the inflationary pressures are being juiced by the surge in transportation costs,” said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics. Using rough estimates, he said that consumer prices have risen 5.3% in the past year and that transportation costs contributed about 10% of that rise. (…)

Let’s hear it from the real transportation world:

(…) The recovery [in shipments] after a skid in June and July amid further slowdowns in rail volumes suggests trucking is picking up slack from the railroads, currently snarled by the chassis shortage.

But shipment volumes remain limited by the capacity of the freight network, as shown by the backlog of 125 or so containerships at anchor off North American ports. SoCal just hit a new record of 49. This containership backlog clearly represents a stronger and longer than average peak season demand outlook.

The extent to which constraints on equipment and driver supply ease in the coming months will largely dictate volumes, with declines likely to continue in intermodal and more pressure on trucking to shoulder the load.

  • Equipment. The intermodal chassis shortage, following tariffs totaling over 200% on key imported steel back in May, is a key reason chassis production has been dismal this year and the intermodal network has run short. Class 8 tractor and trailer supply chain challenges have also limited capacity.
  • Drivers. Though driver capacity is still generally tight, the BLS trucking employment data have improved for three straight months and the ACT Research For-Hire Driver Availability Index continues to recover.

The expenditures component of the Cass Freight Index measures the total amount spent on freight. This index slowed a little more in August to 42% y/y growth from 43% in July. If normal seasonality were to play out for the rest of this year, the full-year increase in this index would be 35% in 2021, after a 7% decline in 2020 and no change in 2019. (…)

Tougher comparisons in the coming months will naturally slow these y/y increases further, but extraordinary growth rates will continue in the near-term, driven by increases in both shipment volumes and freight rates. (…)

Even as easing shortages become more likely, the number of broken or strained links in the supply chain has risen recently, including likely inflationary effects from Hurricane/Tropical Storm Ida, the Delta variant worsening the chip shortage, and the chassis shortage. With a still-tight supply/demand balance, we would suggest the uptrend isn’t over yet.

Though equipment production is still limited by parts and labor shortages, capacity is beginning to return as drivers respond to higher pay, utilizing parked equipment until parts shortages ease. This will gradually change the trajectory of truckload rates, but it will take time. (…)

Class I railroad trends have had a rough few months, lagging seasonal trends due in large part to worsening chassis shortages. ACT Research expects chassis production to be significantly limited for some time, and the intermodal network is unlikely to be able to adjust to a large shortfall in chassis quickly. Though some sizable orders have been placed and manufacturers are on it, we’d roughly estimate it will take six to nine months before chassis production gets to the point where the shortage starts to ease. (…)

Trucking isn’t subject to the same capacity constraints, and the truck driver recovery, though gradual, is likely to help the trucking industry continue to pick up the slack in the coming months. Eventually this will help rebalance the market, but several recent factors, including Hurricane Ida, the Delta variant and the chip and chassis shortages have been inflationary for freight rates, extending the cycle at the margin.

Freight demand fundamentals remain strong, based on a strong U.S. consumer balance sheet, inventory restocking, and an industrial sector struggling to grow into record orders with infrastructure stimulus likely on the way.

But the dynamics of tight supply and exceptionally strong demand which have characterized the past year or so will not last indefinitely. The chip shortage continues to be a key fulcrum on which much in the world economy depends. As discussed in depth in ACT Research’s monthly report, there’s good reason to hope easing will start in Q4.

The Fed Follows Misguided ‘Forward Guidance’ The central bank could bind itself to its own forecasts if it were good at predicting the future, but it isn’t.

(…) The most compelling explanation for the Fed’s refusal to adapt policy to buoyant economic data, then, has little to do with the interpretation of that data. It has to do with the determination of Fed officials to validate their previous predictions of their own future behavior. There is recent precedent for this practice, too.

In March 2018, then-Minneapolis Fed Bank president Neel Kashkari said he would have raised rates that month, had he “been sitting in the chairman’s seat,” because “we told the markets we were going to raise rates.” That is, he would have raised rates not because the data justified it, but because he didn’t want to be wrong.

And last year, Dallas Fed president Robert Kaplan revealed that his December 2020 rate projections would reflect “the forward guidance that we’ve given in September.” “[G]iven we made that decision,” he explained, “I think it’s important for Fed credibility.” That is, the Fed is credible when it does what it said it expected to do, even when those expectations were based on inaccurate economic projections.

This reasoning is flawed. The market is not looking for the Fed to be omniscient about its own behavior, which is mindlessly easy, but to remain dedicated to a sensible and clearly articulated policy framework. This means adapting policy to developments it did not foresee. And to the extent that “forward guidance” on policy rates is standing in the way of such adaptation, it should cease.

GM Plans to Idle Factories Longer Amid Chip Shortage The auto maker said it would add to scheduled downtime at seven plants in the U.S., Canada and Mexico.

(…) Some production lines at two of GM’s Michigan sites—responsible for work on models including the Chevrolet Traverse, the Buick Enclave and the Cadillac Black Wing—will now likely have downtime through September, the company said. At three factories in Canada and Mexico, production stoppages for the Chevrolet Blazer and Equinox SUVs have been extended as well. And at a plant in Kansas, the restart of Chevrolet Malibu production, which has been down since February, has been delayed to November.

Other global auto makers are facing similar challenges. Ford Motor Co. also held back production this month, with work slowing or stopping at factories in Missouri, Michigan and Kentucky. Toyota Motor Corp. said in August it planned to cut September production by 40% because of the semiconductor shortage. (…)

IHS Markit on Thursday cut its global light-vehicle production forecast by more than 13 million for 2021 and for 2022. “The two-and-a-half-month backlog that has built up since June will take time to clear and is anticipated to extend well into 2022,” analysts from the research firm wrote of chip-production shortfalls. (…)

fredgraph - 2021-09-17T061742.640
U.S. Manufacturing
 image image

Strong retail sales and strong new manufacturing orders minimize the stagflation scenario, at least for the “stag” part of it…

U.S. Steel Plans New U.S. Mill as Prices Surge The steelmaker said it aims to put the new sheet-steel mill into production in 2024 to capture demand from a rebounding manufacturing sector.

(…) The U.S. Steel mill would increase new production capacity under construction or planned in the U.S. to about 12 million tons annually, or almost 21% of sheet-steel consumption in 2019.

The new mill represents a bet by U.S. Steel that demand will remain elevated for an extended time, keeping steel prices high even as competing steelmakers pursue their own expansions. The spot market price for sheet steel is nearly $2,000 a ton, up from less than $500 a ton during summer 2020, according to S&P Global Platts. (…)

“We have the winds at our backs. Steel prices seem to be sustainable,” Chief Executive David Burritt said in an interview. (…)

Quite a statement!

image

Particularly given that “Industry analysts say about seven million tons of steel capacity have been idled since the pandemic started last year. That amounted to about 12% of domestic steel consumption in 2019.” With 21% new capacity = 33% potential supply increase, about where I placed the blue dot below:

image

Pop Goes the Chinese Property Bubble? Evergrande may become the biggest casualty but it won’t be the last.

The WSJ Editorial Board:

(…) This is part of a broader campaign to impose credit discipline across the economy. Beijing tolerated defaults on $18 billion of debt in the first half of the year, a record, and is on track to hit a new record for all of 2021. State-owned enterprises are among the deadbeats.

Evergrande may be allowed to default on some bonds or bank loans, but Beijing probably has the capacity to avert a total collapse. China’s relatively closed financial system, state-owned banks and weak rule of law allow the government to stage-manage a restructuring to avoid a systemic meltdown. But this relatively benign scenario will still be painful for the economy in ways the Party won’t welcome.

The main problem is figuring out where the danger lies. Evergrande’s $89 billion in loans and bonds is only part of the picture. Far bigger are the liabilities the company owes to suppliers. Some of that debt must now be circulating through China’s financial gray market in which the sale of assets such as accounts receivable can substitute for normal bank credit.

Evergrande also owes new homes to the many individual buyers who paid in whole or part for homes that aren’t finished yet—and who may have borrowed to fund the purchases. It will take time and considerable effort for authorities to understand who is exposed to Evergrande and to what degree. (…)

The protesters include investors in so-called wealth-management products guaranteed by Evergrande—poorly regulated debt products in which households invest as an alternative to low-interest bank savings deposits. This is the sort of social instability Beijing dreads, even if for now the authorities have the means to tamp it down.

Now multiply this stress across the other property developers likely to run into trouble as Beijing’s housing cool-down continues—and add their suppliers, homeowners whose properties may sag in value, and banks that loaned them money. Talk of a Chinese “Lehman moment”—a financial collapse and recession akin to the failure of Lehman Brothers in 2008—is premature. But the credit correction that Beijing is launching may be harder to manage than the Party’s central planners think.

Protests intensify at China Evergrande Group offices across the country as the developer falls further behind on promises to more than 70,000 investors. Construction of unfinished properties with enough floor space to cover three-fourths of Manhattan grinds to a halt, leaving more than a million homebuyers in limbo.

Fire sales pummel an already shaky real estate market, squeezing other developers and rippling through a supply chain that accounts for more than a quarter of Chinese economic output. Covid-weary consumers retrench even further, and the risk of popular discontent rises during a politically sensitive transition period for President Xi Jinping. Credit-market stress spreads from lower-rated property companies to stronger peers and banks. Global investors who bought $527 billion of Chinese stocks and bonds in the 15 months through June begin to sell. (…)

Rather than allow a chaotic collapse into bankruptcy, they predict regulators will engineer a restructuring of Evergrande’s $300 billion pile of liabilities that keeps systemic risk to a minimum. Markets seem to agree: the Shanghai Composite Index is less than 3% from a six-year high and the yuan is trading near the strongest level in three months against the dollar.

Yet a benign outcome is far from assured. Beijing’s bungled stock-market rescue in 2015 showed how difficult it can be for policy makers to control financial outcomes, even in a system where the government runs most of the banks and can exert outsized pressure on creditors, suppliers and other counterparties. (…)

Even senior officials at state-owned banks say privately that they’re still waiting for guidance on a long-term solution from top leaders in Beijing. Evergrande’s main banks were told by China’s housing ministry this week that the developer won’t be able to make interest payments due Sept. 20, according to people familiar with the matter. (…)

The Evergrande endgame may depend largely on how Xi decides to balance his goals of maintaining social and financial stability against his multi-year campaign to reduce moral hazard. (…)

The only hazard Xi is worried about is him and the party losing control.

The People’s Bank of China added 90 billion yuan ($14 billion) of funds on a net basis through seven-day and 14-day reverse repurchase agreements on Friday, the most since February. Today was the first time this month it added more than 10 billion yuan short-term liquidity into the banking system on a single day. (…)

“A Lehman-style financial-market meltdown is not our top concern, but an extended and severe economic slowdown seems more probable.” (…)

PBOC injects the most short-term cash since February

The editor-in-chief of state-backed Chinese newspaper Global Times warned debt-ridden property giant Evergrande Group (3333.HK) that it should not bet on a government bailout on the assumption that it is “too big to fail”.

It was the first commentary to appear in state-backed media casting doubt on a government bailout for the country’s No.2 property developer, whose shares fell on Friday for the fifth consecutive day amid concerns it is heading for default. (…)

Global Times’ editor-in-chief Hu Xijin said on his WeChat social media account on Thursday that Evergrande should turn to the market for salvation, not the government.

He said Evergrande’s potential bankruptcy was unlikely to trigger a systemic financial storm like the collapse of Lehman Brothers, because it was a real estate business not a bank and downpayment ratios on property in China were very high.

Global Times is a nationalistic tabloid published by the Communist Party’s People’s Daily. Its views do not necessarily reflect the official thinking of policymakers. (…)

Confused smile What about that chip shortage?

Twenty percent of Americans, one in five, believe a vaccine shot injects a microchip. Fourteen percent are not sure. Nearly 1 in 3 republicans believe that.

image

image