The enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it’s the illusion of knowledge (Stephen Hawking)

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so (Mark Twain)

Invest with smart knowledge and objective odds

THE DAILY EDGE: 24 MARCH 2021: Time for Bonds?

FLASH PMIs

Eurozone economy returns to growth for first time in six months

Eurozone business activity returned to growth in March, fueled by a survey record increase in manufacturing output as global demand continued to revive from the pandemic. The service sector was again hit by virus-related restrictions, though even here the decline was the weakest since last August. Hiring picked up as firms boosted capacity in line with fuller order books and optimism about the year ahead. Sentiment was tarnished, however, by concerns over rising virus infection rates.

March also saw firms’ costs rise at the fastest rate for a decade, pushing prices charged for both goods and services higher during the month. Goods prices rose especially markedly, posting the largest rise for almost ten years, often linked to suppliers hiking prices amid record supply chain delays as shortages worsened.

The headline IHS Markit Eurozone Composite PMI® rose from 48.8 in February to 52.5 in March, according to the preliminary ‘flash’ reading. By rising above 50.0, the latest reading indicated the first increase in business activity since last September, with the current expansion the largest recorded since last July and the second-steepest seen over the past 28 months.

image

Divergent trends were seen by sector. While manufacturing output growth accelerated sharply to the highest since data were first available in 1997, the service sector continued to be constrained by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, with social distancing restrictions leading to a seventh successive monthly fall in business activity.

The rate of contraction in the service sector nevertheless moderated to the slowest seen over this period, thanks to spill-over benefits from strong manufacturing growth, a modest easing of virus containment measures and encouraging prospects for the year ahead.

The manufacturing upturn was led by a record surge of factory production in Germany, accompanied by the fastest production growth since January 2018 in both France and the rest of the region as a whole.

image

Germany also outshone in terms of service sector performance, recording the first (albeit modest) expansion of activity for six months while France and the rest of the euro area merely saw rates of contraction moderate.

Looking at growth over both sectors combined, Germany’s resulting upturn was the strongest for just over three years (the composite PMI rising from 51.1 to 56.8), contrasting with a decline in France for the seventh successive month (albeit with the index at 49.5, up from 47.0 in February). The rest of the region saw a modest return to growth for the first time since last July (composite index at 50.6 versus 48.2 in February).

imageInflows of new business also returned to growth over the eurozone as a whole, increasing to the greatest extent since last July. Export orders rose especially sharply, rising at a pace rarely exceeded in the survey’s history due largely to an unprecedented increase in manufacturing, in turn led by a record rise in Germany.

The upturn in order book inflows caused backlogs of work to rise for the first time in 28 months, growing especially sharply in Germany.

Companies responded to the accumulation of uncompleted orders with a second successive month of net hiring, with employment growing at the steepest pace since November 2019.

Manufacturers saw headcounts rise at a rate not seen since August 2018 while a far more modest rate of job creation was seen in the service sector, although even here the rise was the largest since the onset of the pandemic.

France reported the highest rate of job creation, with jobs growth at the steepest since October 2018, while Germany reported the largest payroll gain since June 2019. Job losses meanwhile eased in the rest of the region to the lowest since the pandemic started.

Job creation was also supported by business expectations for the year ahead remaining elevated, although optimism waned slightly from February’s three-year high due in part to concerns over a third wave of virus infections.

The return to growth was accompanied by a further increase in price pressures. Average prices charged for goods and services rose to a degree not seen since January 2019, with goods prices rising particularly steeply, posting the largest gain for almost a decade. Prices rose far more modestly in the service sector, yet the increase was notable in being the first since the pandemic began.

Higher charges often reflected rising costs. Average input prices across both manufacturing and services rose in March at the sharpest rate for a decade. Factory input cost inflation struck the highest since March 2011, often linked to supply shortages. March saw supplier delivery times lengthen to the greatest extent in the survey’s 23-year history. However, service sector input costs also grew sharply, rising at the fastest pace since February of last year. Higher costs were observed across the board, with Germany reporting the steepest increases.

Japan: Downturn in private sector activity persists in March

At 52.0 in March, the headline au Jibun Bank Japan Manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index™ (PMI)® rose from 51.4 in February to signal a quicker improvement in operating conditions. Although output growth softened slightly, new order volumes expanded at the fastest pace since October 2018. That said, manufacturers remained reluctant to take on additional staff, as job shedding continued for a third consecutive month. Moreover, positive sentiment eased in March, with the level of optimism the softest for nine months.

The au Jibun Bank Flash Japan Services Business Activity Index rose from 46.3 in February to 46.5 in March, indicating a softer deterioration in the services sector. New business inflows reduced at the softest pace since October 2020, amid ongoing restrictions on movement. Positively, the pace of job creation quickened in March and was the fastest for 22 months. Firms also remained confident that activity would increase over the next 12 months, despite optimism dipping slightly in comparison to February.

image

HOUSING

Harsh winter weather throughout the country kept many potential home buyers indoors last month. Sales of new single-family homes declined 18.2% (+8.2% y/y) during February to 775,000 units from 948,000 in January, revised from 923,000. Earlier figures also were revised. The Action Economics Forecast Survey expected 879,000 sales in February.

Sales fell throughout the country. Midwest sales dropped 37.5% (+4.9% y/y) to 85,000, the lowest level since last June. In the West, sales weakened 16.4% (-8.1% y/y) to 194,000, down from last October’s high of 277.000. Sales in South were off 14.7% (+20.2% y/y) to 458,000. Falling by 11.6% both m/m and y/y were sales in the Northeast to 38,000 [-11.6% y/y], well below a June 2020 high of 52,000.

The median price of a new home fell 1.1% (+5.3% y/y) in February to $349,400. Working 1.4% higher (7.7% y/y) to $416,000 was the average price of a new home. These prices are not seasonally adjusted.

The supply of new homes for sale in February rose to 4.8 months, up from 3.5 months in October. The median number of months a new home stayed on the market after completion declined to 3.2, after surging to 4.5 months in both August and September of last year.

image

The South (blue) remains THE growth area: February new home sales were 5% above their 2019-2020 average. Excluding the South (black), February sales were back to their flat trend line. New home sales in the West are down 8.1% YoY, 2.5% below their 2019-2020 average.

image

Existing-home sales fell 6.6% in February from the previous month, but sales are still 9.1% higher than last year, per the National Association of Realtors. While the South remains the clear growth leader, existing home sales are up in every region YoY in February.

image

Declining affordability remains the problem for the lower income segment of the population.

fredgraph - 2021-03-23T134439.674

These people are more likely to shop for used houses given that the median price of newly built houses is $349k while the median existing-home sales price is $313,000, 15.8% higher than in February 2020, with all regions posting double-digit price gains.

But existing housing inventory in February fell to a record low of 1.03 million units, down by 29.5% YoY — the fastest decline on record.

The NAR says that properties typically sold in 20 days, also a record, and homes with price tags between $250,000 and $500,000 were on the market for just 14 days.

  • ING says that housing will be a major GDP growth driver in 2021.

The recovery in the housing market has led a turnaround in the construction sector as the left-hand chart below shows. The National Association of Home Builders reports that sentiment remains close to all-time highs (it has a 36-year history) with construction employment having risen by 805,000 since April and with housing starts hitting a 14-year high in December.

With home prices well supported by decent demand amidst a dearth of supply this should incentivise more construction activity despite the higher costs for building materials, such as lumber and steel. Consequently, residential investment is likely to continue making a strong contribution to GDP growth this year.

A strong housing market also boosts demand elsewhere in the economy. Housing activity is strongly correlated to retail sales – as people move to a new home they typically spend money on new furniture and home furnishings, garden equipment and building supplies such as a new paint job and a bit of home improvement. It also results in demand for moving services while generating legal and mortgage fees within the service sector, which should also all help boost economic activity through this year.

Construction spending & residential investment (YoY%)  Source: Macrobond, ING

Source: Macrobond, ING

The downside from all this is that higher housing costs will feed through into higher consumer price inflation. As the chart below shows, the rent of primary residence CPI component (7.8% of the CPI basket by weight) and owners’ equivalent rent of residences (24.2% of the CPI basket by weight) typically lag turning points in the S&P Case Schiller house price series by around 14 months.

The chart suggests that housing will soon be contributing positively to US inflation readings, which given housing’s combined CPI weighting of 32% is a key reason why we believe that inflation will stay higher for longer than the Federal Reserve thinks.

Surging house prices to push consumer price inflation higher

 Source: Macrobond, ING

Source: Macrobond, ING

MORE SUPPLY PROBLEMS

  • Auto Dealerships Face Inventory Squeeze The car industry entered 2021 hoping to restock, but supply-chain problems are extending the crunch—meaning slimmer pickings, higher prices and longer waits.

(…) The lack of new cars stands as a barrier to what could be a strong bounceback year for the industry. (…)

A monthslong shortage of semiconductors has forced auto makers to cut production of even their most-lucrative vehicles. Winter storms in Texas last month disrupted plastics production, leading to shortages of seat foam and other materials, car makers and suppliers have said. A backup at West Coast ports is delaying vehicle-part shipments from Asia. (…)

At the end of February, dealers had 2.7 million vehicles in stock or being shipped to stores, a 26% drop from the same month last year, according to Wards Intelligence. (…)

Car companies on average spent about $3,562 per vehicle on discounts and other sales incentives in February, a $600 drop from the same month a year earlier, according to research firm J.D. Power. (…)

GM has said the lost production could hurt pretax profit by as much as $2 billion this year; Ford pegged the hit at up to $2.5 billion. (…)

(…) That marks a 30% increase over this time last year, when the pandemic’s lockdowns slammed fuel usage. (…)

Supporting gasoline’s climb is a rebound in crude-oil prices and a big drop in the amount in storage. The price of West Texas Intermediate crude has advanced by more than 60% since the end of October to $57.76 a barrel Tuesday, even after a recent tumble. Crude accounts for 56 cents of every dollar consumers spend on gasoline, according to the Energy Information Administration.

Refiners throttled back output last year in response to lower prices and weak demand. The winter freeze that struck Texas in February then knocked some of the nation’s biggest out of action. The combination dragged stocks of motor gasoline below normal levels for March. (…)

  • LDPE plastic film is used for dry cleaner bags, bread bags, paper towel overwrap, and shipping sacks. LLDPE is used for plastic wrap, stretch wrap, pouches, toys, covers, lids, pipes, buckets, containers, cables, geomembranes, and flexible tubing.

This last one is surely transitory…

Meanwhile, demand is rising sharply as Americans receive their new stimmies as Chase’s Spending Tracker reveals:

image

From Bank of America’s own card spending data: “Just as initial stimulus payments started arriving, spending on athletic footwear and apparel jumped over 19% from the prior year. (via Axios)

Even though confidence remains low:

So far, pent up wins over spent up.

Powell Says Stimulus Package Isn’t Likely to Fuel Unwelcome Inflation “We might see some upward pressure on prices. Our best view is that the effect on inflation will be neither particularly large nor persistent,” he said, reiterating comments he has made repeatedly since the measure was enacted earlier this month.

(…) Ms. Yellen said President Biden’s post-pandemic plans will likely need to be paid for with tax increases, such as returning the corporate tax rate to 28%. But she said those changes wouldn’t come until the pandemic is over and would ultimately help the economy. (…)

But there’s more stimulus seemingly coming:

(…) The first proposal would center on roads, bridges and other infrastructure projects and include many of the climate-change initiatives Mr. Biden outlined in the “Build Back Better” plan he released during the 2020 campaign.

That package would be followed by measures focusing on education and other priorities, including extending the newly expanded child tax credit scheduled to expire at the end of the year and providing for universal prekindergarten and tuition-free community college, the people said.

The packages could face a difficult path through the narrowly divided Congress, and Democrats aren’t all in agreement on how they should move forward with their spending and tax proposals. Mr. Biden is expected to be briefed on the details of the proposals this week, and the people warned that the strategy is preliminary. Mr. Biden would need to sign off on the legislative strategy for it to move forward. (…)

If the proposals add up to $3 trillion over a decade, that would represent 1% of GDP and a 5% increase in federal spending beyond current projections.

Democrats are also exploring raising the top marginal income-tax rate for high-income individuals, increasing capital-gains taxes and tightening international tax rules on companies, according to lawmakers and aides. Sen. Ron Wyden (D., Ore.), the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, is expected to detail more international-tax proposals soon. (…)

How Not to Panic About Inflation Remember the lessons of the 2010-2011 scare.

Paul Krugman is “betting” it’s all transitory, making no distinction between monetary stimulus (post 2009) and direct-to-consumer fiscal stimulus.

(…) The key thing to understand is that there are really two kinds of inflation.

The prices of some goods, like oil and soybeans, fluctuate all the time, changing day by day or even minute by minute in response to changes in supply and demand. Inflation in these goods is easy come, easy go; prices may soar quickly when demand is high or supply is tight, but they can plunge just as quickly when market conditions change.

Many other prices, however — including the prices of labor, that is, wages and salaries — change much less frequently. Most workers’ wage rates are adjusted just once a year.

And stagflation, it turns out, mainly involves these “sticky” prices. (…)

So what’s going to happen in the months ahead? We’ll probably see a number of transitory price increases, not just because the economy is booming, but also because the lingering effects of the pandemic have produced some unusual disruptions — for example, a global shortage of shipping containers.

The question will be whether these price increases are a 2010-2011-type blip or something more dangerous. Smart observers will look past the headlines to measures of underlying inflation — not just the Fed’s standard “core” measure but things like the Atlanta Fed’s sticky price index as well. Anecdotal evidence, otherwise known as “talking to people,” will also be important: Are businesses actually starting to set prices and wages based on the expectation of high future inflation?

If they aren’t — and my bet is that they won’t be — then the lesson of 2010-2011 will remain: Don’t panic.

Now as then there are people eager to denounce government attempts to help the economy. And it’s certainly possible that the American Rescue Plan will turn out, in retrospect, to have been too much of a good thing. But don’t let the usual suspects seize on a few months’ inflation data as evidence of looming disaster.

David Rosenberg, rarely in agreement with Krugman, presents the bullish view on bonds:

The future is one of frugality, and not frivolity. This will be the “Boring Twenties,”not the “Roaring Twenties.”The longer end of the Treasury market has peak inflation and peak Fed tightening priced in, and is supremely oversold. Enough said.This week’s Treasury auctions will be a critical test.

  • Sentiment is at its low:

image

  • “Bond yields have always peaked out and rolled over at these levels.” Like Ronald Reagan, I trust but verify: the red dots are approximately where sentiment bottomed above. Rosie is right!

image

ZeroHedge adds a trading angle to this “worst in decades bloodbath”:

This almost unprecedented carnage has strategists predicting large quarter-end rebalancing flows out of equities and into Treasuries. Bank of America strategists estimated that $88.5 billion could shift into U.S. fixed income, including $41 billion into Treasuries.

And we do now know who the most recent marginal seller was.

Since the start of the year, 85% of the cumulative decline in TY futures prices occurred in the overnight session, i.e., Japan is almost single-handedly responsible for the dump surge in yields this year! (…)

Hornbach writes that “we have good reason to believe the selling from Japan won’t last… into April.” That’s because the fiscal year in Japan ends on March 31.

Source: Bloomberg

Source: Bloomberg

Scott Minerd, Global CIO, Guggenheim Investments offers yet another angle:

(…) The question investors face is whether the selloff has more room to run. Our analysis suggests it has largely run its course. The market is now pricing in a neutral rate of 2.35 percent, nearly in line with the Fed’s optimistic long run dots. The chart below shows that the bond market has had difficulty sustaining rates at or near the Fed’s neutral rate projection, and we see no reason to expect a different result this time. Nor do we expect the Fed to revise up its neutral rate estimate.

The Fed’s Optimistic Neutral Rate Projection Is Almost Fully Priced In

3-Month Annualized Rate of Change

Source: Guggenheim Investments, Bloomberg. Data as of 03.19.2021. FOMC neutral rate projection is the median “Longer Run” dot from the Summary of Economic Projections. Market neutral rate projection is the 5-year forward 5-year Overnight Index Swap rate. Fed Funds Rate is depicted using the interest rate on excess reserves.

But is oversold really bullish? From SentimenTrader:

High five “Oversold” doesn’t always mean “buy” and this seemed to be the case here.

When the contract first fell more than 8% below its 100-day average, it tended to lose even more ground over the next 2 months. The 10 prior signals did not provide a consistent signal that mean-reversion was about to rear its head.

And economic surprises remain good so far per Citigroup (via Ed Yardeni):

image

And if the economy grows 4% or more in nominal terms, and 10Y Ts yield range between 0% and 2.5% below nominal GDP growth rate like they have for the last 20 years, the yield range is 1.5% to 4.0%.

fredgraph - 2021-03-24T073358.733

In fact, Nordea’s models suggest 2.0-3.0%:

US 10-year should be heading to 2% …

… or higher if other markets are consulted

Nordea to Krugman:

It is important to understand that the slump of 2020 was a disease-driven supply shock and not a recession where economic imbalances got laid bare as central banks tightened policy by hiking rates. From a macro perspective, 2020 was nothing like the financial crisis, after which it took 10 years to close the output gaps created by the crisis. This time, as soon as the root cause of the supply shock is cured, which will be very soon, the economies can be expected to get back to the starting point very quickly.

The US output gap

I think this also will be true when it comes to the labour market. Central banks are currently clearly worried that it will take a long time before that happens. Interestingly, the share of US small businesses that have job openings is at an all-time high, something that historically has meant rapidly dropping unemployment numbers.

Unemployment should drop fast

(…) It has basically never happened before that the world exits a recession with a huge pile of cash in households’ hands. This was true already before Biden’s new stimulus checks. It is thus not only reasonable to believe that output gaps will close quickly, but also that we could see the most positive output gaps for decades.

A huge pile of cash to spend

25% of U.S. Has Received a Shot

(…) The glacial speed of vaccination programs in many parts of the Asia-Pacific will mean social distancing and travel bans deep into the second half of 2021—and potentially beyond. Currently, China has deployed fewer than six vaccine doses per 100 people, according to Our World in Data, compared with the U.S. figure of 38 and the European Union’s 13. Developed economies in the region trail even further behind: South Korea, Japan and Australia have each deployed fewer than two doses per 100 people. (…)

THE DAILY EDGE: 22 MARCH 2021

THE INFLATION DEBATE…

FIBER: Industrial Commodity Price Rise Continues The Industrial Materials Price Index, from the Foundation for International Business and Economic Research (FIBER), increased 1.7% during the four weeks ended March 19 pulling prices up roughly one-third y/y.

 image image

image

Fed Will Need to Buy Bonds as Stimulus Boosts Yields, Dalio Says

The recent fiscal stimulus announced by the Biden administration will result in more bond sales to finance the spending, worsening the “supply-demand problem for the bonds, which will exert upward pressure on rates,” Dalio said Saturday on a panel at the China Development Forum, an annual conference hosted by the Chinese government. That will “prompt the Federal Reserve to have to buy more, which will exhibit downward pressure on the dollar,” he said.

He said the world is “very overweighted in bonds,” and they are yielding minus 1 basis point in real terms, which is “very bad.”

“And not only might there be not enough demand, but it’s possible that we start to see the selling of those bonds,” he said. “That situation is bearish for the dollar.”

Fed Chair Jerome Powell said this week that current monetary policy is appropriate and there’s no reason to push back against a surge in Treasury yields over the past month.

Actually, the FOMC statement reads

(…) the Federal Reserve will continue to increase its holdings of Treasury securities by at least $80 billion per month and of agency mortgage‑backed securities by at least $40 billion per month until substantial further progress has been made toward the Committee’s maximum employment and price stability goals.

The Fed is totally aware it is involved in a serious poker game against also pretty powerful players. When Ray Dalio talks bearishly about Treasuries, Bridgewater is probably not currently on the bid and “it’s possible that we start to see the selling of those bonds”.

We know inflation measures will soon be rising and that the Fed is betting the market will tolerate it as “transitory”.

We also know that “transitory” will be strongly debated…

…while Treasury issuance will be huge.

We also know that the Fed cannot lose this multi-faceted game: “transitory” inflation it must be since Powell said the FOMC will definitely not use “precautionary”, pre-emptive policies (it will take “actual progress, not forecast progress” to convince the Fed to change tack). Bears will feed on that.

And Powell has defined “actual progress” as being unemployment at 3.5%, where the red line stands below. Progress is reaching the historical best!

image

Can anybody seriously expect near-zero interest rates at record unemployment?

Unless Lacy Hunt proves right and record indebtedness keeps the economy and inflation pretty weak. “Transitory” applied to GDP growth.

Via Steve Blumenthal’s On My Radar:

On CNBC Wednesday evening, [former Dallas Fed president Richard] Fisher was asked how important the Fed’s move from a proactive Fed to a reactive Fed was, and whether such a move was dangerous.

Fisher’s reply:

“It is important, and there is a risk here because you have to remember it takes a lot of time for monetary policy to work its way into the real economy, I’m not talking about market reaction. And if you are reactive, first of all data is out of date by the time you get it, even though we’re getting better at getting contemporary data. If you are reactive, (Fed policy) is going to take time to work into the economy and I think that’s the risk rather than anticipating and using your judgment, going forward, as to what’s likely to happen if, let’s say the bond market determines the 10-year rate.

If the bond market begins to price in some inflationary pressure. The Fed does its work, gets its data, finds out there is more than transitory inflation in play, then they have to tighten or do whatever they need to do. It (policy) takes a while to work into the economy and it (being reactive) will therefore be, I think, be less effective. That’s a risk they’re running.”

CNBC asked Fisher, “There’s a lot of talk about transitory inflation and how far they would let it go. Coming back ultimately to this 2% inflation target, how far do you think they would let inflation go, before they felt the need to do something?”

Fisher’s answer:

“Here’s the problem: If you’re a supply-side economist, you’re also thinking about the kind of cost pressures that are now underway, raw materials, freight—I can go on and on and on. However, a business operator also has to worry about what other new costs are going to be imposed—higher taxes, perhaps unionization, minimum wage efforts, etc.

So, on top of what they’re already seeing, they are likely or possibly going to price in a reaction, and it’s very rare in my experience to have businesses price in an increase, and then take it back. So he’s right, in terms of, compared to the low levels of which we were a year ago.

  • But the problem is it’s the dynamic of going forward and how do businesses react? So that’ll determine how transitory it is.

  • I think what the market is doing is questioning that premise. Look at the 10-year and a five-year yields, the world is questioning that premise.

Will we have transitory inflation, or will it become more embedded? And this isn’t 4 or 5% inflation, I’m just saying above the two-plus level, which the Fed won’t articulate, and I understand why he won’t… But you can build in a behavioral reaction here, and then the Fed has to take the time to respond, and it then takes time for that to play its way through the economy. Which means it could feed its way into itself, that’s the point I’m trying to make.

Fisher concluded, “What I’m more interested in is how the market perceives this.”

Meanwhile, Bank of America reminds us the YtD issuance of Treasuries ($861bn, on its way to $4.45tn this year), IG/HY bonds ($514bn), stocks/SPACs ($178bn), “all on pace for record highs, so bond & equity supply is annualizing a record $7.6TN.” Putting the twin deficit in perspective:

Supply > demand + uncertainty + ?confidence? = correction/bear:

Summers Sees ‘Least Responsible’ Fiscal Policy in 40 Years

(…) In his latest attack on the recent rush of stimulus, Summers told David Westin on Bloomberg Television’s “Wall Street Week” that “what was kindling, is now igniting” given the recovery from Covid will stoke demand pressure at the same time as fiscal policy has been aggressively eased and the Federal Reserve has “stuck to its guns” in committing to loose monetary policy. (…)

He said there is a one-in-three chance that inflation will accelerate in the coming years and the U.S. could face stagflation. He also saw the same chance of no inflation because the Fed would hit the brakes hard and push the economy toward recession. The final possibility is that the Fed and Treasury will get rapid growth without inflation.

“But there are more risks at this moment that macroeconomic policy will cause grave risks than I can remember,” said Summers, who is a paid contributor to Bloomberg. (…)

Bond Rout Hits Safest Company Debt Returns on investment-grade corporate bonds have faltered and spreads have widened amid broader selloff

image(…) Bonds from highly rated companies have lost more than 5.4% this year, counting price changes and interest payments, through March 18. That is their second-worst start in data going back to 1996, the worst being last year’s pandemic-fueled selling, according to Bloomberg Barclays data. That compares with a 0.2% return for high-yield bonds and a 1.7% gain in corporate loans to highly indebted borrowers. (…)

At around 8 1/2 years, the duration on the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. investment-grade bond index implies an 8.5% change in price for every 1% move in interest rates. That is nearly 40% higher than the average duration from 1992 to 2008, according to data compiled by Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, and more than three years higher than it was in the trough of the 2008-09 recession. (…)

Credit quality has fallen to its weakest point in decades. Companies including hotel operator Marriott International Inc. and furniture company Steelcase Inc. suffered downgrades after pandemic borrowing, leaving more than 50% of the U.S. market now at the lowest rung of the investment-grade ladder, according to Morgan Stanley. (…)

With billions of dollars of debt outside the U.S. producing negative returns after taking inflation into account, more foreign investors have turned to the U.S. investment-grade market. (…)

For foreign investors’ interest:

image

On the other hand, if people continue to focus on relative growth rather than financials the USD could actually strengthen before it weakens as Nordea argues:

In terms of relative growth forecasts, or in term of revisions to said forecasts, the USD should be in a very strong spot – rising 20% yoy instead of falling 15% yoy(!).

USD/G9 vs relative growth

Also when we weigh the forecasts with the DXY weights, the USD should be gaining rather than weakening – though not as much as when we look at an equal-weighted average of G9 forecasts (since these are held down by Sweden, Switzerland and Norway). This is not the prettiest chart we have made, but we figured we’d show it anyway.

Dollar index (DXY) vs relative growth

Back to interest rates, more uncertainty comes from the Fed’s decision last week not to extend the SLR. Bloomberg explains (my emphasis):

As the March 31 end of the waiver to something called the supplementary leverage ratio (SLR) approached, many banks argued that it should be extended, lest they be forced to retrench while the economy is still fragile. Bank critics, including Senator Elizabeth Warren, pushed to end the break, noting that banks were managing to return tens of billions to shareholders through buybacks and dividends. The Fed decided to let the waiver lapse, but said it would propose other ways of addressing the banks’ concerns. (…)

When the Fed purchases Treasuries from a money manager, those securities become an asset on the central bank’s balance sheet. The seller deposits the cash it received at a bank, and the bank in many cases adds it to the reserves it holds at the Fed. That makes the money an asset for that bank and a liability for the Fed. In other words, the Fed’s big purchases boosted the asset levels of U.S. banks. If the SLR had been left in place, those increased assets would have meant that banks needed to set aside more capital as reserves.

The last thing the Fed wanted during that critical time was for banks to be pulling money out of the economy. So it eased the SLR so that banks’ excess capital could be deployed to struggling businesses and households. The continuing disruption in Treasuries was also a major factor in the decision. The move allowed banks to help stabilize that market, while maintaining funding for short-term borrowing arrangements known as repurchase agreements.

Wall Street pointed out that the pain from coronavirus is far from over. JPMorgan Chase & Co. cautioned that it might have to shun customer deposits if tougher rules are reinstated — an awkward situation just as the big Covid relief bill signed by President Joe Biden in mid-March pumped billions into consumers’ accounts. Analysts have also tied recent bouts of wild trading in the $21 trillion Treasury market tied to concerns that banks will be forced to hold less government debt, even potentially selling hundreds of millions of dollars of their holdings. By some measures, the SLR break allowed banks to expand their balance sheets by as much as $600 billion. (…)

{The Fed] concluded the threat that Covid-19 poses to the economy isn’t nearly as severe as it was a year ago. But the agency also said that it’s going to soon propose new changes to the SLR to address the recent spike in bank reserves triggered by the government’s economic interventions. Central bank officials said they don’t want the industry’s overall capital levels to change. The Fed did provide another consolation, though, by more than doubling to $80 billion the maximum overnight reverse repo activity a participant can execute through the central bank’s facility. That could absorb some of the pressure of too much government stimulus cash sloshing through the system by giving money market funds a place to put it.

Nordea illustrates the risk to Treasuries:

More reserves might trigger selling of USTs (and higher yields?)

Meanwhile, rising Treasury yields are pushing mortgage rates up while house prices are exploding:

fredgraph - 2021-03-21T080012.332

But the market doesn’t care:

(Dave Wilson’s Chart of the Day)

Return of the Bond Vigilantes? Watch 3EDGE Asset Management’s Steve Cucchiaro 11 minute video.

(…) A hawkish Fed can counteract a big-spending White House by hiking rates. But Mr. Powell has committed to no hikes until inflation is sustainably at the Fed’s target and the country is at full employment. Most policy makers think that means at least three more years of near-zero rates.

The question is what happens if the target is reached earlier. If inflation picks up fast, say to 3%, will the Fed be willing to hike rates early and risk a rise in unemployment? What about 4%?

(…) pushing up unemployment to restrict inflation will hit that group the most. Politically that makes tighter monetary policy harder to justify. (…)

However, everything is in place for at least a bout of market anxiety about inflation. (…)

Yet, a permanent regime shift clearly isn’t priced into Treasurys. Even after last week’s jump, the 10-year still only yields around 1.7%, and long-term bond market inflation expectations have been stable. Investors, in the main, accept Mr. Powell’s pitch, and think that after a brief period of higher price rises, the Fed will be willing to assert its independence and keep inflation in line.

If the market loses confidence, long-dated Treasury yields should ramp up even faster, the dollar would slide and stocks most reliant on profits far in the future, think Tesla, will be hit hard.

Real inflation scares hurt.

Speaking of long-dated equities, Richard Bernstein reminds us to beware investing in stories without considering how much these stories are actually worth (video) [what my investment life is all about…].

Go international as Steve Cucchiaro suggests? One problem is with countries sporting high USD debt and rising inflation. There have been 8 global rate hikes YtD. “The net interest burden of emerging-market governments is more than three times that of their developed-market counterparts, while emerging markets are both more inflation-prone and dependent on external financing” (Nomura)

eema

We have seen this movie several times before:

And that one as well:

  • New Realtors Pile Into Hot Housing Market Surging prices are persuading tens of thousands more Americans to try their hands at selling real estate, but supply is extremely tight. There are more agents than homes for sale in the U.S.
PROFIT MATTERS

From Refinitiv/IBES:

Through Mar. 19, 498 companies in the S&P 500 Index have reported revenue for Q4 2020. Of these companies, 73.3% reported revenue above analyst expectations and 26.7% reported revenue below analyst expectations. In a typical quarter (since 2002), 61% of companies beat estimates and 39% miss estimates. Over the past four quarters, 67% of companies beat the estimates and 33% missed estimates.

In aggregate, companies are reporting revenue that are 3.8% above estimates, which compares to a long-term (since 2002) average surprise factor of 1.0% and the average surprise factor over the prior four quarters of 1.8%.

The estimated earnings growth rate for the S&P 500 for 20Q4 is 4.1%. If the energy sector is excluded, the growth rate improves to 8.0%. The estimated revenue growth rate for the S&P 500 for 20Q4 is 2.7%. If the energy sector is excluded, the growth rate improves to 6.0%.

The estimated earnings growth rate for the S&P 500 for 21Q1 is 22.9%. If the energy sector is excluded, the growth rate improves to 23.8%.

image

image

Trailing EPS are now $142.64. Full year 2021: $175.54e. Full year 2022: $202.11e.

image

image

TECHNICALS WATCH

My favorite technical analysis firm remains bullish seeing a broadening of the market, gradually out of tech into a number of cyclical sectors. It notices rising supply, however, but, using the Fed’s positive narrative, qualifies it as transitory as “enthusiastic demand” takes care of the waning interest in Technology.

That said, tech stocks jumped 2.9% last week. Yet, INK Research notes the “depressed level of Tech insider sentiment” approaching its 10-year low.

Now, depressed insider sentiment does not necessarily foreshadow depressed tech stock share prices. When it hit its 10-year low in November 2013, it was a false signal in no small part due to QE by the Fed. Importantly, at the time the XLK was riding comfortably above its 200-day moving average (+10%). Low bond yields plus momentum allowed tech stocks to continue sailing.

The next time we came close to the 2013 lows was in March 2019, and it was a different story with the XLK straddling its 200-day. The ETF subsequently traded flat for 6 months.

With the indicator approaching its low again, the XLK is sitting firmly above its 200-day by more than 10%. However, we may not be in a repeat of 2013. Back in 2013, bonds were still in their multi-year bull market. That bull market appears to be over which increases the risk that the XLK will soon test its 200-day as rising long yields pressure valuations. As such, we will be watching to see if the ETF heads back below the 200-day. Should that happen in conjunction with ultra-low insider sentiment, that could indicate the formation of a significant peak in Technology stocks.

xlk

image

Airlines struggle to take off in face of $300bn debt headwinds Recovery may take years as industry grapples with rescue finance and state loan bills

Revenue for the top seven airlines is down 67% from a year ago, and U.S. passenger airlines collectively are burning cash at a rate of $150 million a day, according to Airlines for America.

  • They’ve added $60 billion in new debt over the past 12 months, and analysts say it will take years to pay down their current $170 billion debt load, limiting future growth.
  • The industry has received a total of $54 billion for payroll support since the pandemic hit.

Equity investors couldn’t care less for these mundane details:unnamed - 2021-03-20T074907.245

U.S., China Should Cooperate on Supply Chains: Ex-IMF Official

(…) “The U.S. and China should and can work together on stabilizing global supply chains,” Zhu Min, previously deputy managing director of the IMF, said Saturday at the China Development Forum, an annual conference hosted by the Chinese government. He cited rising geopolitical tensions that threaten to hurt global economic growth and financial stability as the major reasons for better cooperation.

On monetary policy, it’s also very important for the two sides to work closely, he said, adding they should coordinate if any further stimulus package is planned since inflation is coming back faster and stronger than expected.

Other areas of collaboration include global trade, governance issues and the digital economy, he said. (…)

COVID-19

share-people-vaccinated-covid

coronavirus-data-explorer (40)

VIRTUAL IRREALITY

Whether you’re shaking your fist like an old man with kids on his lawn, or a true believer in Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) looking to make millions, there’s a booming ‘virtual reality’ real-estate market where people are buying and selling parcels of ‘land’ across several online “metaverses” – where people are building virtual hotels, stores, and other properties in the hopes of increasing their value.

And if you’re an accredited investor willing to drop at least $25,000 – and you’re invited – there’s a fund for those who want to get in on the NFT real estate market. (…)

Bloomberg unpacks:

Plots sell daily in online worlds such as Decentraland, a virtual place with its own economy, currency and social events calendar, accessible to anyone with a web browser. And values for such assets are multiplying.

This year through March 15, the average price paid per parcel in Decentraland was $2,703 — more than triple what it was in 2020, according to NonFungible.com, which tracks the sales. Land prices quadrupled in the metaverse called Cryptovoxels, from $821 a parcel last year to $3,895 in the first two and half months of 2021.

Republic, meanwhile, has purchased over 30 parcels across four metaverses, and is in talks with a real-world hospitality brand to co-develop a hotel and bar on one of those sites. (…)

We assure you, this is real. This week, contemporary artist Krista Kim recently sold an NFT-minted digital house, called “Mars House,” for 288 ether – valued at more than $500,000 based on Friday’s trading price. (…)

“For me, I actually foresee that we will be living in an augmented reality lifestyle within a very short period,” Kim added, saying it could happen in “a couple years.” (…)

The new owner of Mars House will be able to upload the property to various metaverses.

In February, meanwhile, eight lots of virtual real estate sold for a combined $1.5 million on gaming platform Axie Infinity, according to NonFungible.

“There is obviously some fear-of-missing-out phenomenon behind this,” says NonFungible COO, Gauther Zuppinger, in an email to Bloomberg. “The best, rarest places are almost all purchased. The secondary market shows that the first buyers sell their assets for way more than the initial price.” (…)\

“Buying land today in virtual worlds may end up feeling a lot like buying land in Manhattan in the 1750s,” says Yorio. “There is massive growth ahead, and now is the time to get in on the ground floor.

Wait, wait! There’s more!

Anybody smelling a peak?