Amazon to Lay Off Over 18,000 Workers, the Most in Tech Wave The cuts focused on the company’s corporate staff exceed an earlier projection and represent about 5% of the company’s corporate workforce.
(…) and 1.2% of its overall tally of 1.5 million employees as of September. (…)
“Amazon has weathered uncertain and difficult economies in the past, and we will continue to do so,” said Mr. Jassy. He added that the majority of the cuts are on the retail and recruiting areas of Amazon. The blog post said the company would alert affected employees later this month. (…)
On Wednesday, Salesforce Inc. CRM 3.57%increase; green up pointing triangle said that it was laying off 10% of its workforce. Co-Chief Executive Marc Benioff said the business-software provider hired too many people as revenue surged earlier in the pandemic. “I take responsibility for that,” he said.
Job Openings Held Nearly Steady in November, Showing Still-Strong Labor Demand Available positions well exceed number of unemployed Americans seeking work
About 10.5 million jobs were available in November, essentially unchanged from October and well above prepandemic openings levels, the Labor Department said Wednesday. The report also showed layoffs stayed low and a larger share of workers quit their jobs in November than a month earlier, a sign Americans were still confident in their employment prospects. (…)
Workers have handed in more than four million resignations each month since the economy reopened in mid-2021, outpacing the average 3.5 million resignations in 2019 before the pandemic hit.
Quits rates have remained elevated in recent months in industries including leisure and hospitality. (…)
Note that private hires (red) have dropped 12.1% since February and are back to pre-pandemic levels.
Fed Minutes Show Officials Feared Markets’ Rallies Could Hinder Inflation Fight Policy makers worried they could have to raise rates more than projected if higher stock, bond prices spur economy
(…) “An unwarranted easing in financial conditions, especially if driven by a misperception by the public of” how the Fed will react to economic developments “would complicate the committee’s effort to restore price stability,” said minutes of the Fed’s Dec. 13-14 meeting. (…)
While inflation moderated in October and November, officials last month “stressed that it would take substantially more evidence of progress to be confident that inflation was on a sustained downward path,” the minutes said.
Officials indicated they saw the risk of inflation staying higher than many forecasters anticipate as “a key factor shaping the outlook for policy,” the minutes said. (…)
Some 17 of 19 officials penciled in plans to raise the rate to a level above 5% in 2023 and hold it there until some time in 2024. No officials projected rate cuts next year, the minutes said.
Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari, in an essay published online Wednesday, said he expects the Fed to pause rate rises after reaching a peak rate of 5.4%.
“Wherever that end point is, we won’t immediately know if it is high enough to bring inflation back down to 2% in a reasonable period of time,” he said. “Any sign of slow progress that keeps inflation elevated for longer will warrant, in my view, taking the policy rate potentially much higher.” (…)
Last month, officials projected that year-over-year core inflation, which excludes volatile food and energy categories, would fall from 4.8% in the fourth quarter of 2022 to 3.5% in the same period of this year, according to their preferred gauge, the Commerce Department’s personal-consumption expenditures price index. That was up from their projection in September that it would fall from 4.5% to 3.1%. (…)
On Wednesday, investors saw a roughly 70% probability of a 0.25-point rate increase at the Fed’s coming meeting, and a 30% probability of a larger half-point bump, according to interest-rate futures market prices compiled by CME Group. (…)
More from the minutes (my emphasis): note that the first 5 dots reflect the staff’s views, followed by “participants’ views”.
- incoming data showed nascent signs of a moderation in inflationary pressures
- Both market- and survey-based measures continued to point to expectations for a moderation of inflation over the coming year.
- output was expected to move below the staff’s estimate of potential near the end of 2024—a year later than in the previous forecast—and to remain below potential in 2025. Likewise, the unemployment rate was expected to move above the staff’s estimate of its natural rate near the end of 2024 and remain above it in 2025.
- With the effects of supply–demand imbalances in goods markets expected to un-wind further and labor and product markets projected to become less tight, the staff continued to forecast that inflation would decline markedly over the next two years. Core goods inflation was anticipated to slow further, housing services inflation was expected to peak in 2023 and then move down, while core non-housing services inflation was forecast to move down as wage growth eased. In 2025, both total and core PCE price inflation were expected to be near 2 percent.
- With inflation still elevated, the staff continued to view the risks to the inflation projection as skewed to the upside. Moreover, the sluggish growth in real private domestic spending expected over the next year, a subdued global economic outlook, and persistently tight financial conditions were seen as tilting the risks to the downside around the baseline projection for real economic activity, and the staff still viewed the possibility of a recession sometime over the next year as a plausible alternative to the baseline.
So the FOMC’s staff observes that economic growth and inflation are slowing as desired by the Fed and that a recession in 2023 is plausible. Yet, they view the risk to inflation as skewed to the upside while the risk to growth is skewed to the downside. ![]()
- Participants remarked that, although real GDP appeared to have rebounded moderately in the second half of 2022 after declining somewhat in the first half, economic activity appeared likely to expand in 2023 at a pace well below its trend growth rate. With inflation remaining unacceptably high, participants expected that a sustained period of below-trend real GDP growth would be needed to bring aggregate supply and aggregate demand into better balance and thereby reduce inflationary pressures.
- They also observed that many households were increasingly using credit to finance spending. Overall, participants assessed that there was considerable uncertainty around the consumer spending outlook.
- Participants generally concluded that there remained a large imbalance between labor supply and labor demand, as indicated by the still-large number of job openings and elevated nominal wage growth. Participants commented that labor demand had remained strong to date despite the slowdown in economic growth, with a few remarking that some business contacts reported that they would be keen to retain workers even in the face of slowing demand for output because of their recent experiences of labor shortages and hiring challenges.
- some participants commented that labor supply appeared to be constrained by structural factors such as early retirements, reduced availability or increased cost of childcare, more costly transportation, and reduced immigration.
- a continued subdued expansion in aggregate demand would likely be needed to reduce remaining upward pressure on inflation.
- Participants noted that, in the latest inflation data, the pace of increase for prices of core services excluding shelter—which represents the largest component of core PCE price inflation—was high. They also remarked that this component of inflation has tended to be closely linked to nominal wage growth and therefore would likely remain persistently elevated if the labor market remained very tight. Consequently, while there were few signs of adverse wage-price dynamics at present, they assessed that bringing down this component of inflation to mandate-consistent levels would require some softening in the growth of labor demand to bring the labor market back into better balance.
- Participants generally noted that the uncertainty associated with their economic outlooks was high and that the risks to the inflation outlook remained tilted to the upside. Participants cited the possibility that price pressures could prove to be more persistent than anticipated, due to, for example, the labor market staying tight for longer than anticipated.
- A number of participants judged that the risks to the outlook for economic activity were weighted to the downside. They noted that sources of such risks included the potential for more persistent inflation inducing more restrictive policy responses, the prospect of unexpected negative shocks tipping the economy into a recession in an environment of subdued growth, and the possibility of households’ and businesses’ concerns about the outlook restraining their spending sufficiently to reduce aggregate output.
- monetary policy approached a stance that was sufficiently restrictive to achieve these goals.
- Participants generally observed that a restrictive policy stance would need to be maintained until the incoming data provided confidence that inflation was on a sustained downward path to 2 percent, which was likely to take some time. In view of the persistent and unacceptably high level of inflation, several participants commented that historical experience cautioned against prematurely loosening monetary policy.
- Participants generally indicated that upside risks to the inflation outlook remained a key factor shaping the outlook for policy. A couple of participants noted that risks to the inflation outlook were becoming more balanced. Participants generally observed that maintaining a restrictive policy stance for a sustained period until inflation is clearly on a path toward 2 percent is appropriate from a risk-management perspective.
Participants noted that the economy is slowing “at a pace well below its trend growth rate” and that “there were few signs of adverse wage-price dynamics at present” even though labor demand was strong as companies opt to “retain workers” and due to ”structural factors”. They also noted that prices of “core services excluding shelter—which represents the largest component of core PCE price inflation—was high.
Which is true on a YoY basis (+7.3% in November) but MoM this category was down in October and unchanged in November; last 4 months +3.2% annualized.
The rest is about risks to their views and forecasts which, dare I say, have been quite wrong in the past several years…
- Fed’s George Says Rates Should Stay Above 5% Well Into 2024 The Fed raised its benchmark interest rate from nearly zero to 4.3% last year.
Corporate Insiders Aren’t Betting on a Market Rebound It is telling that executives and directors haven’t been scooping up their own stocks, even as market declines have lowered share prices.
Insider sentiment, measured by the trailing three-month average ratio of companies whose executives or directors have been buying stock versus selling, has dropped for six consecutive months, according to data from InsiderSentiment.com. That is the longest such decline in almost two years. (…)
Last year, the ratio of insider buying to selling inched up in June when stocks hit their summer lows, but it has been trending downward ever since. If insiders remain on the sidelines, that could portend more trouble ahead for the stock market, strategists say. (…)
Among the few sectors seeing increased insider buying activity are the small-cap healthcare, industrials and consumer-staples groups, according to InsiderSentiment.com’s analysis. Those segments are traditionally considered defensive sectors that can hold up in a recession. (…)

Data: 
(…) While models vary, the 
