The enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it’s the illusion of knowledge (Stephen Hawking)

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so (Mark Twain)

Invest with smart knowledge and objective odds

NEW$ & VIEW$ (7 MARCH 2014)

U.S. Household Net Worth Hits Record

The net worth of U.S. households and nonprofit organizations rose 14% last year, or almost $10 trillion, to $80.7 trillion, the highest on record, according to a Federal Reserve report released Thursday. Even adjusted for inflation using the Fed’s preferred gauge of prices, U.S. household net worth—the value of homes, stocks and other assets minus debts and other liabilities—hit a fresh record. (…)

Driving most of the past year’s gains was a record-setting rally in the U.S. stock market, which saw the broad Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index soar 30% last year. The increase in stock prices has disproportionately benefited affluent Americans, who are more likely to own shares. The value of stocks and mutual funds owned by U.S. households rose $5.6 trillion last year, while the value of residential real estate—the biggest asset for middle-income Americans—grew about $2.3 trillion, the Fed figures show.

Holdings of stocks and bonds as a share of overall net worth, at 35%, is at the highest level since the dot-com bubble burst in 2000, Fed data show. That means that even as wealth increases, it’s increasingly going to the affluent.

In addition to the affluent, much of the wealth surge is going to older Americans. Both groups are less likely to spend their gains and more likely to save, Mr. Emmons said. Meanwhile, sheer demographics—the retirement of the baby boomers and America’s aging population—are increasing the ranks of the nation’s savers. (…)

Younger families in particular continue to lag behind in the wealth recovery. The average young family—led by someone under 40—has recovered only about a third of the wealth it lost during the crisis and recession, the St. Louis Fed said in a recent study. By contrast, the average wealth of middle-aged and older families has recovered to roughly precrisis levels.

(…) total U.S. household debt was about 109% of disposable income in the fourth quarter, down from a peak burden of around 135% in 2007, Fed data show. A more manageable debt burden could prompt American households to borrow and spend more at a time when the job market remains sluggish and income growth weak.

Indeed, overall household borrowing rose an annualized 0.9% last year, the biggest percentage rise since 2007. Last year also saw the smallest decline in mortgage debt since 2008, a sign that fewer Americans are entering foreclosure and some more are taking out new mortgages. Other types of consumer credit grew 6% last year, though much of these gains were student loans.

As the housing-market recovery continues, more Americans are regaining equity in their homes, which makes it easier for them to trade up, refinance debts and borrow. A measure of owners’ equity as a share of the value of real-estate holdings hit 51.7% in the fourth quarter, up from 50.6%. (…)

Getting in Financial Shape

RICH PEOPLE GETTING TIRED PULLING ECONOMY

Or is it only the weather?image

image

Excluding the drug stores, the Thomson Reuters Same Store Sales Index registered a 0.3% comp for February, missing its 1.9% final estimate. The 0.3% result is the weakest showing since August 2009’s -2.4% SSS result. Including the Drug Store sector, SSS growth rises to 1.8%, below its final estimate of 2.8%. 45% of the retailers missed their estimates. During the first two weeks of February, retailers were severely affected by bad weather. Those that beat expectations, said this was offset by improved weather during the last weeks of February, and tax refunds.

Our Thomson Reuters Quarterly Same Store Sales Index, which consists of 75 retailers, is expected to post 0.9% growth for Q1 (vs. 1.7% in Q1 2014). This is below the 3.0% healthy mark. Moreover, due to the amount of negative guidance for Q1 2014, analysts have become bearish on retailers, and have been lowering both earnings and same store sales expectations since the beginning of the quarter (Feb). Since the beginning of the year (January 2014) the Same Store Sales growth estimate for Q1 2014 was 2.4%. Today, it is 1.3%.

From Rich Yamarone’s Orange Book: Executives Await Spring Thaw as Outlooks Remains Under the Weather

Just as fourth-quarter economic growth was revised downwards, so too have earnings expectations been downgraded. The outlooks for many industries have worsened, especially those with large exposure to the household sector, such as retailers and restaurants, and some of the more commercial businesses in basic
materials and capital goods. The true underlying tone of the economy has been obscured by widespread and economically-compromising snowstorms across the entire U.S. It may take a spring thaw to get a clearer perspective.

The CEO Economic Comments Sentiment Index for the week ended March 7 was 49.59, essentially flat from the Feb. 28 reading of 49.77.

Investors don’t seem to care. After all, spring is coming!

image

AND NOW, THE WEATHER REPORT

Courtesy of the Browning Newsletter via John Mauldin:

(…) Ironically, NOAA classified the overall temperature for the Lower 48 in January and early February as near average. This is because the above average warmth in the West balanced out the below-average temperatures east of the Rockies. (…)

For the 48 contiguous states, January was the third coldest January on record and broke more than 4,800 snowfall records. Below-average temperatures have also
dominated much of February as well from parts of the Midwest and Plains to the Northeast. (…)

Now, as spring approaches, the Atlantic warming will increase and we will begin to see a major shift in the overall continental weather pattern. The season will
become even more volatile as Gulf and Atlantic air creeps into the continent. This will create a battle of the air masses with the US particularly the Midwest, as the battleground. In many ways, this will create a break. For short periods, especially toward the middle of March, the jet stream will level out, allowing more warmth to flow into the Southeast and even the Mid-Atlantic states. To the west, this means the jet stream and winter rains will enter the West Coast further south, allowing rainfall to hit the Pacific Northeast and, occasionally, Northern California. This does not mean a “Miracle March” will break the drought – just that the West will get some much-needed precipitation.

imagePrecipitation may not be as appreciated in the Midwest. The region has been so cold that an incredible 88% of the Great Lakes- Superior, Michigan, Huron,
Ontario and Erie—are now frozen over. That’s the largest ice cover the Great Lakes have experienced since 1994, and it means that there is an astounding 82,940 sq. miles (214,814 sq. km) of ice. (To give a sense of perspective, back in 2002, just 9.5% of the Great Lakes froze over. Normally, only 50% of the water surface freezes.) Historically this creates a cooler, wetter springtime, with frequent floods and delayed planting through Eastern Canada and the Midwest.

While the climate factors that are shaping this winter and spring are already surrounding North America, the factors that will shape this summer come from the distant Tropical Pacific. (…)

It is probable that there will be an El Niño this summer and, thanks to Mt. Kelud, it will have a moderate impact on global weather. This is very good news for the US but Australia and Indonesia need to prepare for dry conditions. India, which frequently sees its summer monsoons reduced by El Niños, especially if the Indian Ocean is in a negative phase of the Indian Ocean Dipole as it was in 2009, needs to be on the alert. (…)

Overall, between the extraordinarily cold Arctic air mass, the warming Atlantic and Tropical Pacific and the impact of Mt. Kelud, it looks as if it will be a volatile spring with late planting that will develop into an excellent growing season for most of North America. In years like this, farming is never easy, but the harvests tend to be
very good.

SENTIMENT WATCH
Birthday cake  Happy 5th Anniversary To The Bull Market 
Gift with a bow  Companies Rush to List Shares Companies are launching IPOs at the fastest pace in years to take advantage of booming share prices and investor demand.

In the first two months of this year, 42 companies went public in the U.S., raising $8.3 billion and tying 2007 for the busiest start to a year for initial public offerings since 2000, when there were 77 in the period, according to Dealogic.

In 2013, by comparison—itself a strong year for IPOs—there were 20 such offerings in the first two months. (…)

The pace at which companies are making new public filings for IPOs is at levels not seen since 2000, according to Renaissance Capital LLC, an IPO research and investment firm. In January and February, there were 56 such company filings, topping the 35 in that period in 2007. While still not close to 2000s 159 filings, this year’s number might be even higher if not for new rules that allow companies with less than $1 billion in revenues to initially file for an IPO confidentially, which most eligible firms are taking advantage of.

Investors willing to take a chance on new listings this year have been rewarded handsomely. The average U.S. IPO in 2014 had risen 19% from its debut through Feb. 28 and 5% from where it closed after its first day of trading, according to Dealogic. The S&P 500 index, meanwhile, is up only slightly this year, though it is trading at record levels. (…)

By one key measure, investors are bidding more aggressively for newly minted shares this year than they have in more than a decade, paying a median 14.5 times annual sales, compared with six times in 2007, according to University of Florida finance professor Jay Ritter. At the height of the Internet frenzy in early 2000, they paid a whopping 30 times. (…)

So far this year, nearly three-quarters of companies that have gone public are unprofitable, according to Prof. Ritter of the University of Florida. Just under two-thirds have annual sales of less than $50 million. Both measures are at their highest in any year since 2000, although they don’t approach the levels reached in that era. (…)

(Bespoke Investment)

Draghi calls eurozone ‘island of stability’

(…) He said that although the events in Crimea would have a “severe” effect on Russia’s economy and an escalation of geopolitical tensions risked “great consequence” for the eurozone, the eurozone recovery should survive intact. (…)

Pointing up The euro’s renewed status as a safe haven could, however, complicate the task of policy makers if it led to a further strengthening of the euro. Mr Draghi was uncharacteristically bold in flagging the euro’s strength as a big factor in the bloc’s struggle with disinflation.

The latest forecasts assume that the euro will buy you $1.36. It is now worth two cents more than that and could rise further if tensions to the east of the eurozone intensify. While keeping to his usual line that the ECB does not target the exchange rate, he said currency movements were “very important for growth and price stability.”

He estimated that the strong euro had knocked around 0.4 percentage points off inflation. “That is a significant statement on how the exchange rate might influence our price stability objective,” he said.

Punch Island of stability! Hmmm…Read on:

THE WEST AND RUSSIA PLAY A GAME OF CHICKEN KIEV

(…) Should the situation deteriorate, Russia could halt energy exports through the Ukrainian pipeline leaving just Nord Stream to pick up the slack – but even that could only cope with half the increase in volume that would necessitate. This could lead to significant increases in European energy prices, with potential repercussions for inflation that would further complicate Mario Draghi’s task. To make matters worse some 40% of the European Union’s natural gas imports come from Russia – though this amounts to 30% of total consumption. The gas is delivered through a large network of pipelines mostly crossing Belarus (to the Baltics) and Ukraine (to CEE states like Poland) – the Nord Stream pipeline (through the Baltic and Northern Germany) was meant to be a politically safe alternative but will not suffice. Some of the biggest importers of Russian gas in the EU are Germany and Italy where Russian natural gas imports account for roughly 30% of consumption and Greece where most of the natural gas consumed comes from Russia – cold winters ahead if things do not improve soon.

Fingers crossed The weather could change rapidly in that region…

German Industry Off to a Strong Start An unusually mild winter helped lift industrial output in Europe’s largest economy, signaling that Germany is off to a good start this year, data from the country’s economics ministry showed.

imageIndustrial output increased by 0.8% in adjusted terms in January, beating economists’ expectations of a 0.7% monthly rise. The December reading was also revised significantly higher. The ministry now says that output grew by 0.1% in the final month of 2013, a big improvement from the 0.6% decline originally reported.

The data follow unexpectedly strong manufacturing orders in January, according to figures released by the ministry Thursday, which suggest that Germany’s economy got off to a robust start this year. The overall rise in orders stemmed from both domestic orders and those outside of the euro zone, which increased by 7.2%. By contrast, orders from within the currency bloc fell by nearly 9% on the month.

Among the major categories, construction output increased by 4.4% on the month in January, while capital goods output increased by 0.8%. Manufacturing output grew by 0.3%. The economics ministry attributed the expansion in construction output to the unusually mild winter.

OIL  Confused smile

Thumbs down Speaking with The Wall Street Journal’s Selina Williams this week, Mr. Scaroni predicted a coming fall in the oil price just as the industry is grappling to get costs under control.

New fields coming on stream in Brazil, the Barents Sea off Norway and onshore in the U.S. will lift supply, he said, while a shift from burning oil to gas will see demand drop. The result: $90-a-barrel oil, something that hasn’t been seen with any consistency since 2011.

Thumbs up  Meanwhile in Houston, Chevron boss John Watson told industry gathering IHS CERAWeek that oil companies need triple-digit oil prices. (…)

As companies pursue the ever more challenging oil reserves that they need to increase or merely sustain their production, their costs have risen to the point that the most expensive projects, such as deepwater developments or liquefied natural gas plants, need an oil price of at least $100 a barrel to be commercially viable.

That is why even with internationally traded Brent crude at about $110 per barrel – up from about $20 in the 1990s – this has not been a good time to be an investor in the oil industry.

Now a growing number of oil executives are saying that has to change. As discussions at the IHS Cera Week conference in Houston made clear, cost-cutting is back at the top of the industry’s agenda.

Chevron and ExxonMobil’s shares have both risen 11 per cent in the past three years, and Total’s by 8 per cent, while Royal Dutch Shell’s have fallen 2 per cent. In the same period the S&P 500 index rose more than 40 per cent.

Futures prices show oil is expected to fall further, with five-year Brent at about $91 a barrel, suggesting that the pressure on oil producers’ profits will intensify. (…)

All the large western oil companies have reached similar conclusions. Andrew Mackenzie, chief executive of BHP Billiton, the mining and energy group, suggests the oil companies have reached the same point the miners were at a couple of years ago: facing up to the need to improve productivity in an environment of weaker commodity prices. (…)

In 2000, just seven companies tackled projects that cost $5 billion or more, according to Luc Messier, the head of project development and procurement for ConocoPhillips. Now there are more than 35. All are competing for the same service contractors, engineers and equipment, meaning costs are ballooning.

Even at the less-rarefied end of the market, competition for services will mean higher costs.

Surprised smile Energy business research and consulting firm Douglas-Westwood says the oil and gas industry will need to drill over 670,000 wells between now and 2020 to meet forecasts of demand. In 2013 over 79,000 development wells were drilled, the company says in a forecast paper. In 2020 this number will need to exceed 106,000. (WSJ and FT)

NEW$ & VIEW$ (4 MARCH 2014)

Sarcastic smile Americans Open Wallets in January

Personal consumption, the government’s official tally of spending on everything from restaurants to cars, climbed a seasonally adjusted 0.4% in January from a month earlier after a weak December gain, the Commerce Department said Monday.

The increase was driven by a 0.9% surge in spending on services—the largest since October 2001—due to greater consumption of health care and utilities. Unusually cold weather likely was behind the higher outlays on utilities. Purchases of goods fell for the second straight month.

The report showed Americans’ incomes climbed 0.3% in January. About three-quarters of that gain was due to new provisions of the Affordable Care Act, including expanded Medicaid benefits and health insurance subsidies that count as income in the official tally. In turn, newly insured Americans likely scheduled doctors’ appointments they may have postponed before, some analysts said.

The Commerce Department warned that it based its latest estimates on preliminary data, including enrollments via health-insurance exchanges.

The Federal Reserve’s preferred inflation gauge, the price index for personal consumption expenditures, rose 1.2% in January from a year earlier. Excluding food and energy, prices rose 1.1%.

imageA separate inflation measure reported last month, the consumer-price index, showed prices rose 1.6% in January from last year, the strongest year-over-year gain in six months.

The good news is that January numbers were generally good. The bad news is that they may well be revised lower, as were the late 2013 numbers, as I expected (HARD PATCH COMING?). November and December 2013 real expenditures, originally estimated up 0.8%, were revised to +0.3%. Adding January’s +0.3% estimated growth, the annualized growth rate over the last 3 months is 2.4%, still above what is suggested by retail sales.

The same applies to real disposable income which declined at a 1.2% annualized rate between October and December but bounced back +0.3% (+3.7% a.r.) in January. Many special factors were noted in January. Excluding government transfers, real personal income was unchanged in January, as was the case in the 3 months previous.

The WSJ shows irrational exuberance in its headline today (Americans Open Wallets in January) for wallets were only opened to pay for Obamacare and sharply higher utility bills. Real expenditures on goods dropped 0.6% in January following –0.2% in December.

Weekly chain store sales rose 0.3% last week and the 4-wk m.a. is up for the 3rd consecutive week, up 1.9% YoY.

image

Auto U.S. Vehicle Sales Remain Under Pressure

Unit sales of light motor vehicles edged up a scant 0.7% to 15.34 million (SAAR) during February, unchanged year-to-year according to the Autodata Corporation. Sales have fallen 6.5% from the recovery high of 16.41 million in November.

Last month, auto purchases edged up 0.6% to a 7.34 million annual rate (-5.6% y/y). Sales of domestic autos improved 1.4% to 5.19 million (-5.6% y/y). Sales of imports declined 1.3% to 2.15 million (-5.5% y/y).

Sales of light trucks increased 0.7% m/m to 8.00 million (5.8% y/y). Sales of imported light truck sales rebounded 6.9% to 1.01 million (0.2% y/y). Domestic light truck sales, in contrast, slipped 0.1% to 6.99 million (+6.6 y/y).

CalculatedRisk’s charts tell the story. the short-term trend is weak, giving more credence to my thesis that we may well have reached the cyclical peak.

  image image

U.S. ISM Index Begins to Recover

The Composite Index of Manufacturing Sector Activity from the Institute for Supply Management improved to 53.2 during February from 51.3 in January.

Recoveries in inventories (52.5) and supplier deliveries (slower) prompted the improvement in last month’s factory sector. New orders also rose slightly (54.5). Offsetting these gains was a sharply lower reading for production (48.2) and an unchanged employment figure (52.3). The new export orders index fell to 53.5, the lowest reading since September and the imports index was unchanged at 53.5, the lowest reading since January of last year.

Sarcastic smile Student Loans Used for More Than School Some Americans are lining up for federal student aid, not for education but for the chance to take out low-cost loans, sometimes with little intention of getting a degree.

(…) borrowing thousands in low-rate student loans—which cover tuition, textbooks and a vague category known as living expenses, a figure determined by each individual school—also can be easier than getting a bank loan. The government performs no credit checks for most student loans. (…)

The Education Department’s inspector general warned last month that the rise of online education has led more students to borrow excessively for personal expenses. Its report said that among online programs at eight universities and colleges, non-education expenses such as rent, transportation and “miscellaneous” items made up more than half the costs covered by student aid.

The report also found the schools disbursed an average of $5,285 in loans each to more than 42,000 students who didn’t log any credits at the time. The report pointed to possible factors such as fraud in addition to cases of people enrolling without serious intentions of getting a degree. (…)

G-20 Inflation Eased Again in January The rise in consumer prices slowed across the world’s largest economies for a second month, driven by falling inflation rates in several developing economies.

The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development said Tuesday the annual rate of inflation in its 34 developed-country members rose to 1.7% from 1.6% in December, while in the Group of 20 leading industrial and developing nations it fell to 2.6% from 2.9%.

Weaker global price rises were the result of declines in the annual rate of inflation in India, Indonesia, Russia and Brazil. The annual rate of inflation was steady in China and increased in South Africa.

UKRAINE: THE POKER GAME BEGINS

Ukraine matters: Barron’s piece yesterday was pretty weak:

What the Ukraine Crisis Means for U.S. Stocks?

(…) Writing for Fortune magazine, Mohamed El-Erian, the outgoing chief executive officer of Pimco, points out that while Ukraine is only a tiny part of the global economy, the political fallout is far from contained and could potentially deepen the pain for U.S. investors.

“Absent overwhelming outside military intervention (whose outcomes would be far from certain, and its chaos would be considerable and inevitable), it is hard to argue that any single side is in a position to prevail decisively in the next few weeks,” writes El-Erian.

“Russia does not have sufficient influence with enough of Ukraine to pull the whole country back into its orbit; and it cannot do so by force. For their part, the European Union and the United States do not have the means to decisively pull all of Ukraine the other way. And the reality of these external anchors means that a partly fragmented Ukrainian society is unlikely to resolve the tensions internally any time soon.”

Meanwhile, a round-up of opinions on Wall Street by Fortune’s sister website,CNNMoney suggests that the crisis in Ukraine could be resolved without inflicting much more harm on U.S. stocks.

The article quotes John De Clue, international investment strategist at U.S. Bank Wealth Management of Minneapolis, who concedes that geopolitical risks could weigh on stocks in the short-term. but said that “it’s hard to construct a scenario for trouble.” (…)

It’s been awfully cold in Minneapolis lately so we’ll excuse him for his lack of imagination. John Mauldin generously offers some clues, the scariest being from Gavekal:

(…) What makes this confrontation so dangerous is that US and EU policy seems to be motivated entirely by hope and wishful thinking. Hope that Vladimir Putin will “see sense,” or at least be deterred by the threat of US and EU sanctions to Russia’s economic interests and the personal wealth of his oligarch friends. Wishful thinking about “democracy and freedom” overcoming dictatorship and military bullying.

(…) Russia’s annexation of Crimea is the most dangerous geopolitical event of the post- Cold War era, and perhaps since the Cuban Missile crisis. It can result in only two possible outcomes, either of which will be damaging to European stability in the long-term. Either Russia will quickly prevail and thereby win the right to redraw borders and exercise veto powers over the governments of its neighbouring countries. Or the Western-backed Ukrainian government will fight back and Europe’s second-largest country by area will descend into a Yugoslav-style civil war that will ultimately draw in Poland, NATO and therefore the US.

No other outcome is possible because it is literally inconceivable that Putin will ever withdraw from Crimea. To give up Crimea now would mean the end of Putin’s presidency, since the Russian public, not to mention the military and security apparatus, believe almost unanimously that Crimea still belongs to Russia, since it was only administratively transferred to Ukraine, almost by accident, in 1954. In fact, many Russians believe, rightly or wrongly, that most of Ukraine “belongs” to them. (The very name of the country in Russian means “at the border” and certainly not “beyond the border”). Under these circumstances, the idea that Putin would respond to Western diplomatic or economic sanctions, no matter how stringent, by giving up his newly gained territory is pure wishful thinking. Putin’s decision to back himself into this corner has been derided by the Western media as a strategic blunder but it is actually a textbook example of realpolitik. Putin has created a situation where the West’s only alternative to acquiescing in the Russian takeover of Crimea is all-out war.

And since a NATO military attack on Russian forces is even more inconceivable than Putin’s withdrawal, it seems that Russia has won this round of the confrontation. The only question now is whether the new Ukrainian government will accept the loss of Crimea quietly or try to retaliate against Russian speakers in Ukraine—offering Putin a pretext for invasion, and thereby precipitating an all-out civil war.

That is the key question investors must consider in deciding whether the Ukraine crisis is a Rothschild-style buying opportunity, or a last chance to bail out of risk-assets before it is too late. The balance of probabilities in such situations is usually tilted towards a peaceful solution—in this case, Western acquiescence in the Russian annexation of Crimea and the creation of a new national unity government in Kiev acceptable to Putin. The trouble is that the alternative of a full-scale war, while far less probable, would have much greater impact—on the European and global economies, on energy prices and on the prices of equities and other risk- assets that are already quite highly valued. At present, therefore, it makes sense to stand back and prepare for either outcome by maintaining balanced portfolios of the kind recommended by Charles, with equal weightings of equities and very long-duration US bonds.

Looking back through history at comparable episodes of severe geopolitical confrontation, investors have usually done well to wait for the confrontation to reach some kind of climax before putting on more risk. In the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis, the S&P 500 fell -6.5% between October 16, when the confrontation started, and October 23, the worst day of the crisis, when President Kennedy issued his nuclear ultimatum to Nikita Khrushchev. The market steadied then, but did not rebound in earnest until four days later, when it became clear that Khrushchev would back down; it went on to gain 30% in the next six months. Similarly in the 1991 Gulf War, it was not until the bombing of Baghdad actually started and a quick US victory looked certain, that equities bounced back, gaining 25% by the summer. Thus investors did well to buy at the sound of gunfire, but lost nothing by waiting six months after Saddam Hussein’s initial invasion of Kuwait in August, 1990. Even in the worst-case scenario to which the invasion of Crimea has been compared over the weekend—the German annexation of Sudetenland in June 1938—Wall Street only rebounded in earnest, gaining 24% within one month, on September 29, 1938. That was the day before Neville Chamberlain returned from Munich, brandishing his infamous note from Hitler and declaring “peace in our time”. The ultimate triumph of hope over experience.

Another view?

Don’t listen to Obama’s Ukraine critics: he’s not ‘losing’ – and it’s not his fight

Chips being thrown out:

But this is not the first time Russia has used gas exports to put pressure on its neighbour – and “gas wars” between the two countries tend to be felt far beyond their borders. Russia, after all, still supplies around 30% of Europe’s gas.(…)

Europe accounts for around a third of Gazprom’s total gas sales, and around half of Russia’s total budget revenue comes from oil and gas. Moscow needs that source of revenue, and whatever Vladimir Putin’s geo-political ambitions, most energy analysts seem to agree he will think twice about jeopardising it. Short of an actual war, the consensus appears to be, Europe’s gas supplies are unlikely to be seriously threatened.

The move is likely to heap further pressure on Ukraine’s struggling economy. Ukraine paid Gazprom about $400 per thousand cubic metres in 2013, a price that was cut to $268.50 under the deal struck in December. Many analysts and investors believe that Ukraine will not be able to avoid a debt restructuring. (…)

Elsewhere:

Japan wages show first rise in two years

The preliminary figures released on Tuesday were not entirely reassuring, however: even as base pay edged up 0.1 per cent, the first rise in 22 months, overtime and bonuses went into reverse, offsetting the gain and dragging total take-home earnings down 0.2 per cent.

Tuesday’s data showed that rising wages for relatively low-paid part-time workers accounted for the increase in base earnings in January.

Such workers make up a growing share of the labour force, but with unemployment at 3.7 per cent they are in short supply.

Permanent workers – a group that includes white collar “salarymen” but also many factory workers – continued to experience pay declines in January, the data showed. Their wages are typically set annually in negotiations with employers which are expected to wrap up in the next several weeks.