The enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it’s the illusion of knowledge (Stephen Hawking)

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so (Mark Twain)

Invest with smart knowledge and objective odds

THE DAILY EDGE: 23 DECEMBER 2020

Personal Income and Outlays, November 2020

Personal income decreased $221.8 billion (1.1 percent) in November according to estimates released today by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Disposable personal income (DPI) decreased $218.0 billion (1.2 percent) and personal consumption expenditures (PCE) decreased $63.3 billion (0.4 percent).

Real DPI decreased 1.3 percent in November and Real PCE decreased 0.4 percent. The PCE price index had no change. Excluding food and energy, the PCE price index had no change.

image

Trump Asks Congress to Amend Covid-19 Package, Boost Direct Payments President Trump criticized the roughly $900 billion coronavirus relief deal passed by Congress, saying the bill has “almost nothing to do with Covid” and called on lawmakers to increase direct payments to Americans.

“I am asking Congress to amend this bill and increase the ridiculously low $600 to $2,000 or $4,000 for a couple,” he said in a tweeted video. (…) If he vetoes it, lawmakers would need to either pass new legislation meeting his demand for larger stimulus checks or vote to override his veto—which requires a two-thirds threshold for passage in each chamber. (…) If Mr. Trump doesn’t sign or veto the bill within 10 days after it is passed, it would become law without his signature.

Aides said they view the tweet more as the president voicing his displeasure with the bill than an actual veto threat. (…) Most lawmakers have already left Washington for the holidays following the bill’s passage.

The White House didn’t immediately respond to a question about whether the president planned to veto the bill. But the president—who is scheduled to leave Washington on Wednesday to spend the holidays at his Florida resort, Mar-a-Lago—indicated he wouldn’t sign the current version.

“I am also asking Congress to immediately get rid of the wasteful and unnecessary items from this legislation, and to send me a suitable bill, or else the next administration will have to deliver a Covid relief package,” he said. “And maybe that administration will be me, and we will get it done.” (…)

Note Let’s Limbo Some More Note

unnamed - 2020-12-23T075357.970

Data: Axios Research; Chart: Andrew Witherspoon/Axios

unnamed - 2020-12-23T080004.365

COVID19
  • The new Covid-19 strain that emerged in the U.K. is possibly already in the U.S., Germany, France and Switzerland, officials in those countries said. Ireland imposed new restrictions to stem an “extraordinary growth” in cases, and said the nation should act on the assumption that the new variant has arrived.
  • Denmark’s health authorities said that about 10% the country’s positive test results are now of the N439K mutation of the virus, calling the rate “concerning.” The mutation, which was first discovered in Romania in May, is different from the one spreading in the U.K. and also from the one that infected the Danish mink farms earlier this year, authorities said.
  • Boris Johnson’s government is examining whether to move more areas of England into lockdown to counter a faster-spreading variant of coronavirus. Ministers are considering whether to apply the highest Tier 4 restrictions — forcing non-essential shops and leisure facilities to close — to more regions, according to a person familiar with the matter.
States Impose Strictest Covid-19 Lockdowns Since Spring New restrictions on business and social gatherings seek to prevent a holiday-fueled coronavirus surge, as some people remain defiant and fatigued.

image

From Goldman Sachs:

 image image

image image

U.S. Existing Home Sales Decline in November; Availability Shrinks to Record Low

The National Association of Realtors (NAR) reported that sales of existing homes fell 2.5% (+25.8% y/y) during November to 6.690 million (AR) from 6.860 in October, revised from 6.850 million. (…)

The number of homes on the market declined 22.0% y/y. The months’ supply of homes on the market fell to 2.3, a record low, down from 4.8 months in May.

Sales declined in most of the country. In the Northeast, sales eased 2.2% (+25.7% y/y) to 880,000 units after double-digit increases in each of the prior four months. Sales in the Midwest fell 2.5% (+24.2% y/y) to 1.590 million after rising to a record 1.630 million in October. In the South, sales fell 3.8% (+25.9% y/y) to 2.820 million from the record 2.930 million in October. In the West, sales held steady at 1.400 million (27.3% y/y) after a 1.4% October rise.

The median price of an existing home eased 0.7% (+14.6% y/y) to $310,800. The mean sales price slipped 0.5% last month (+11.3% y/y) to $343,000. (…)

Sales of existing single-family homes declined 2.4% (+25.6% y/y) to 5.98 million units after increasing for five consecutive months. Sales of condos and co-ops fell 2.7% (+26.9% y/y) to 710,000 units. It also followed five straight months of strong gains and left sales at the highest level since February 2007.

 image image

U.S. Consumer Confidence Drops in December

(…) The jobs gap, representing the difference between respondents indicating ‘jobs are plentiful’ and those saying ‘jobs are hard to get’, declined to -0.2% from +6.9% suggesting the unemployment rate will hold steady or potentially rise in December. This series has an 80% correlation with the unemployment rate over the last ten years. The decline in the labor market differential was the result of both a decrease in the ‘jobs plentiful’ measure and a rise in the ‘jobs hard to get’ index. (…)

image

CFOs Optimistic But Uncertain About the Pace of Recovery

The Duke University’s Fuqua School of Business survey was fielded from November 30 to December 11, 2020.

the-cfo-survey-optimism (1)
image
since-march-has-your-bus
Cash Piles, Vaccines Force Economists to Rethink Canada Outlook

(…) Strong fiscal support, the start of vaccinations and a growing pile of savings in consumers’ accounts have caused forecasters to revise their views of Canada’s recovery. Economists surveyed by Bloomberg this month see output expanding by an average 5.4% annualized in the final three quarters of 2021, much higher than the 3.8% forecast in November.

Canada has proved itself a fiscal champion during the pandemic, with the most generous emergency response in the Group of Seven, according to International Monetary Fund data. The longer-term implications of such massive deficit spending are unclear, but it has left the country well-positioned for a strong 2021 rebound, mostly on the potential upside from consumption when vaccines roll out and restrictions lift.

image

Global cargo logjam deepens, delaying goods bound for retailers, automakers

(…) Container ships have been sailing at full load since August – something that has not happened in a decade, said Peter Sand, chief shipping analyst with trade association BIMCO. (…) Importers and exporters are “upset they’re not able to move their product or crop as willingly as they would like to,” said Gene Seroka, executive director of Port of Los Angeles – the busiest U.S. seaport. (…)

“It’s a combination of strong volume and slower and less efficient operations,” said Lars Mikael Jensen, head of network with Denmark’s A.P. Moller Maersk, the world’s biggest container line. “This is the perfect storm for global container flows,” Jensen said.

Asian business confidence gains steam, pandemic still top risk – Thomson Reuters/INSEAD survey

Reuters Graphic

Companies dump US office space at rapid rate Success of remote working during pandemic raises prospect that many workers will not return to offices
Biden Pledges Tough Response to Suspected Russian Hack President-elect Joe Biden promised a forceful response to the suspected Russian hack of the federal government, faulting President Trump for not prioritizing cybersecurity and saying digital threats were among the most grave problems facing the U.S.
A REUTERS SPECIAL REPORT: China launches ‘gray-zone’ warfare to subdue Taiwan Having crushed the resistance to its rule in Hong Kong, China is moving against Taiwan with irregular tactics meant to exhaust the island’s military – which is in bad shape to confront the threat. It’s unclear how the incoming Biden administration will respond.

(…) It’s not the final, titanic clash that Taiwan has long feared, with Chinese troops storming the beaches. Instead, the People’s Liberation Army, China’s two-million-strong military, has launched a form of “gray zone” warfare. In this irregular type of conflict, which stops short of an actual shooting war, the aim is to subdue the foe through exhaustion.

Beijing is conducting waves of threatening forays from the air while ratcheting up existing pressure tactics to erode Taiwan’s will to resist, say current and former senior Taiwanese and U.S. military officers. The flights, they say, complement amphibious landing exercises, naval patrols, cyber attacks and diplomatic isolation.

The risk of conflict is now at its highest level in decades. PLA aircraft are flying menacingly towards airspace around Taiwan almost daily, sometimes launching multiple sorties on the same day. Since mid-September, Chinese warplanes have flown more than 100 of these missions, according to a Reuters compilation of flight data drawn from official statements by Taiwan’s Ministry of National Defense. The data shows that in periods when political tension across the Taiwan Strait peaks, China sends more aircraft, including some of its most potent fighters and bombers. (…)

There has been a “clear shift” this year in Beijing’s posture, a senior Taiwanese security official responsible for intelligence on China told Reuters. Chinese military and government agencies have switched from decades of “theoretical talk” about taking Taiwan by force to debating and working on plans for possible military action, the official said. (…)

This is from Phillip Orchard on Geopolitical Futures last August 21:

China is beginning to feel more restless about Taiwan – and a convergence of internal pressures in China, along with the belief in Beijing that Washington is too concerned with its own issues to stomach the costs of coming to Taipei’s defense, gives China reason to consider moving on Taiwan sooner rather than later. (…)

But Beijing has an inescapable problem: It’s still a long way from being able to invade and hold Taiwan – at least not without incurring costs it could not stomach. Still, it needs to do something to reverse Taiwan’s outward drift. And what it can do is manufacture a crisis on Taiwan’s periphery – one intended to make Taipei conclude that reunification by force is a matter of when, not if, and that it might just find itself without any friends in the fight when it comes. (…)

Beijing’s strategy toward Taiwan the past decade has thus relied on tools like political operations, economic coercion and diplomatic isolation. The overriding goal has been to make it easier for Taipei to one day decide that peaceful reunification is in its own best interest. For Taipei to reach this conclusion, though, it still needs to believe that China is willing to take matters into its own hands and impose reunification by force – especially since China’s soft power tools have evidently been failing.

Short of an invasion, China does have a number of options. (…)

Instead, expect Beijing to look for moves that simultaneously A) make Taiwan feel alone against a foe whose military threats are not mere bluffs, B) please nationalists back home, C) carry a low risk of provoking the U.S. and friends into coming to Taiwan’s defense, and D) allow itself to back down without appearing to back down if the moves begin to backfire.

There are two ways to do this. One is to impose a much more limited, selective blockade. It could start intercepting Taiwanese cargo ships, claiming that they’re carrying some sort of contraband or cooking up some other sort of rationale. No one would believe Beijing’s claims, but it wouldn’t matter. No one is going to come to Taiwan’s defense in that situation either way. And it would be unlikely to lead to war with Taiwan itself. If the diplomatic backlash became too intense, or if Taipei signaled a willingness to talk, Beijing could claim success and back down whenever it saw fit.

Far more likely is the scenario that Beijing appears to be actively prepping for: Taking one of Taiwan’s lightly defended far-flung islands in the South or East China sea. (…)

For Beijing, the islands are an ideal target for a number of reasons. They have at least some strategic value, given their location amid critical shipping lanes, particularly in the Bashi Channel. The Pratas or Itu Aba could be useful, if only marginally so, in expanding the range of Chinese bombers and anti-ship missiles. More important, they would deepen China’s regional superiority in information operations (i.e. its communications, surveillance and reconnaissance capabilities). If nothing else, they would function as missile sponges in a conflict, expanding the target set for the U.S. at a time when the U.S. would be fighting with limited reserves of ammo.

Meanwhile, Chinese strategists are constantly bemoaning the fact that Chinese forces have minimal experience, particularly with amphibious operations. This is deeply problematic given that China also wants the disputed, Japan-controlled Senkakus (ironically, also vigorously claimed by Taipei) and needs to be prepared for a scenario in which it needs to retake an island from the U.S. or a rival claimant state in the Spratlys or Paracels. Perhaps most important, since the U.S. is highly unlikely to go to war over a remote island well within China’s anti-ship missile umbrella, taking the islands could deepen doubts in Taipei and other regional capitals about U.S. willingness to shed blood on their behalf.

Still, this, too, would carry numerous risks for China. It would mean abandoning any remaining hope of winning over Taiwan largely through soft power, while compelling Taipei to strike back with its own considerable economic leverage. It would also raise the political costs in Taipei of pursuing a cross-strait strategy of engagement, while fanning the flames of independence forces on the island. Moreover, there’s always a risk that the operation could result in an embarrassing failure that President Xi Jinping couldn’t tolerate. Nobody really knows just how much China’s naval, air force and missile buildups match quantity with quality, and there’s quite a bit of evidence that Chinese forces would still struggle to project power far from Chinese shores. There’s a case to be made that the PLA is better off playing pufferfish than risking exposure as a paper tiger.

The biggest risk, of course, is the international backlash it would likely generate – particularly if an actual military engagement is involved. Taiwan’s deployment of 200 marines to the Pratas wasn’t meant as a way to forcefully block a Chinese landing, just to function as a tripwire and raise the political stakes of China going forward with it. It’s one thing, in other words, for China to just claim squatters’ rights on an uninhabited reef. It’s quite another to start stacking bodies. While China’s inherent maritime disadvantages may be its biggest strategic vulnerability, this only becomes a problem if Beijing gives the U.S. and other powers a reason to exploit it.

Far more pressing and far more existential for the Communist Party is still its internal economic fragility. At a time when U.S. economic pressure is only intensifying, and with its aggressive moves elsewhere starting to turn other major economic powers against it as well, it would seem to have good reason to refrain from making matters worse for itself by launching a kinetic operation of marginal benefit against a foe whose stellar COVID-19 management has suddenly made it a diplomatic darling.

And yet, such concerns haven’t deterred China elsewhere in the South China Sea, nor in Hong Kong, nor in the Himalayas, nor with Australia, nor anywhere else that has alienated Western business partners it needs. Time and again, Beijing appears to be declaring that it’s willing to bear the costs of pursuing what it has deemed critical political interests at home and strategic imperatives abroad. Paradoxically, the more U.S. economic pressure and political opposition in Taiwan mounts, the less China may have to lose by staying the course. Though China is unlikely to pick a “practice fight” over Itu Aba or the Pratas in the near future, the chances of it are certainly rising. Best of luck to those 200 Taiwanese marines.

Canada Vetoes China Gold Deal in Arctic Canada blocked Chinese state-owned Shandong Gold Mining Co. from buying a gold mine in the Canadian Arctic

Red rose BEST WISHES Rainbow

Hope, patience, courage, health and recovered freedom and joy in 2021

THE DAILY EDGE: 9 SEPTEMBER 2019

Modest August Job Growth Shows Economy Expanding, but Slowly

The U.S. economy added 130,000 payrolls in August, the Labor Department reported Friday, and has averaged 156,000 new jobs a month over the past three. That was down from average growth of 190,000 a month in the eight years since employment started picking up after the last recession. The August tally was propped up in part by the addition of 25,000 temporary Census Bureau workers by the U.S. government, while estimates of payrolls in July and June were revised down. (…)

A survey of households showed the share of workers aged 25 to 54 working or seeking work increased to 82.6% in August from 82% in July, the largest monthly increase since 1960 and a signal that working-age individuals remain optimistic about their job prospects.

Meanwhile, pay is holding up after slowing a bit in the spring. Average hourly earnings climbed 3.2% from August 2018, enough to keep worker earnings well above the inflation rate. (…)

Manufacturers added 3,000 employees to their payrolls in August, another sign of slowdown. So far this year, manufacturing payrolls have grown 27,000, compared with growth over the same period in 2018 of 154,000 and in 2017 of 91,000.

Manufacturing overtime dipped to 3.2 hours a week, the lowest level since April 2017.

Forecasting firm Macroeconomic Advisers projects economic output in the third quarter will grow at an annual rate of 2%, matching the 2% pace in the second quarter while down from 2.9% in 2018. (…)

Source: FTN Financial (via The Daily Shot)

The YoY rate of growth in the payrolls index (employment x hours x wages) hooked up a little to +4.5% last month, up a strong 0.74% MoM bringing the last 3 months a.r. to +5.4% from +3.6% during the 3 previous months. Hourly earnings (wages) of production and nonsupervisory employees, 80% of the total, jumped 0.5% MoM in August and are up 3.5% YoY.

From a labor income standpoint, the consumer is in decent shape as wage growth is compensating for slower employment growth.

image

Importantly, the employment level for the 25-54 year-group jumped by 669k in August after dropping 292k in July. It is now up 0.7% YoY. It was –0.5% in July! These are the big spenders.

However, remember that Markit’s August Services PMI for the U.S. sunk from 53.0 in July to 50.7 in August.

In line with a slower expansion in new business, employment across the service sector rose at only a fractional rate in August. The rate of job creation was the softest since February 2010 as firms expressed greater reluctance to increase staffing, with the vast majority noting no change in workforce numbers.

There is a clear slowing in Services employment growth:

image

The Services PMI is falling in synch with manufacturing while new orders and employers’ optimism are reaching new lows:

 image image

A reminder that the goods-producing side of the economy is weak:

The Association of American Railroads produces this chart that is a good reflection of the goods economy in the USA:

image

Lastly, payroll estimates keep being revised down, often the sign of a weak labor market. Payroll gains were revised up until March when downward revisions became the norm as government statisticians learned to adjust to a softening labor market. March gains were revised down -43k, April -47k, May –13, June -46k and July –5k.

In all, this was a decent employment report but the foundations are fragile. Hence

  • Powell Signals Rate Cut Likely at Meeting This Month Fed chairman says U.S. economy remains in “good place,” due partly to Fed easing
  • To keep the upper hand, Trump tweeted Friday: “They were WAY too early to raise [rates], and Way too late to cut,” Mr. Trump said. “Where did I find this guy Jerome? Oh well, you can’t win them all.”

Meanwhile, business sales growth was down to 1.3% in June from 8.0% one year ago and is now much slower than wage growth. Hmmm…

image

China’s Central Bank to Free Up $126 Billion for Lending The People’s Bank of China plans to reduce the amount of reserves that commercial banks are required to keep with the central bank by half a percentage point as the world’s second-largest economy faces increasing pressure from a trade war with the U.S.
China Says Growth Is Fine. Private Data Show a Sharper Slowdown. Beneath China’s stable headline numbers, there is a growing belief the real picture is worse. That has economists, analysts, companies and investors crunching data—from energy consumption to photos taken from space—to get a more accurate reading.

(…) Beneath China’s stable headline economic numbers, there is a growing belief among economists, companies and investors around the world that the real picture is worse than the official data. That has analysts and researchers crunching an array of alternative data—from energy consumption to photos taken from space—for a more accurate reading.

Their conclusion: China’s economy isn’t tanking, but it is almost certainly weaker than advertised. Some economists who have dissected China’s GDP numbers say more accurate figures could be up to 3 percentage points lower, based on their analysis of corporate profits, tax revenue, rail freight, property sales and other measures of activity that they believe are harder for the government to fudge. (…)

As the effects of tit-for-tat tariffs filter into China’s economy, the country’s government has also tightened access to data that has proved reliable in the past, in some cases stopping the release of indicators that paint an unfavorable picture. (…)

China’s Trade Numbers Send More Distress Signals Imports fall for fourth straight month in as a drop-off in exports to the U.S. steepens

Chinese imports of everything from raw materials to high-tech products dropped 5.6% in August compared with a year earlier, the same decline as July, the Chinese customs data showed. (…) Sunday’s customs data showed a 1% decrease in exports in August from a year earlier, reversing a 3.3% gain in July. (…)

Although China’s exports to the European Union held up, exports to the U.S. tumbled by nearly 16% last month after falling 6.5% in July from a year earlier, customs data show. (…)

From ING:

China’s exports were weaker than expected in August, falling 1% after a short lived positive growth rate of 3.3% in July. This was despite a low base effect.

Most of the fall was attributable to a decline in exports to the US, which were down 8.9% YoY. 

Perhaps more shocking was the drop in imports.  

Headline imports into China fell 4.6% YoY, of which imports from the US slid 27.5% YoY. This data shows that while China has been hurt by the trade war, the US has suffered even more.

image

image

Markit’s PMI Indices suggest that the U.S. manufacturing sector is hurting more than China’s:

image

Canada’s Jobs Market Surprises Again With Monster Gain

The economy added 81,100 jobs last month, Statistics Canada said Friday in Ottawa, versus expectations for a gain of about 20,000. It’s the seventh largest monthly gain in records going back to 1976. Canada has now added 471,300 jobs over the past 12 months, the most in a year since 2003.

Canada adds 81.1K jobs in August

  • Hourly pay was up 3.7% in August from a year earlier. While that’s down from 4.5% in July, it’s still well above average in recent years. Permanent worker pay slowed to an annual pace of 3.8%
  • Total hours worked in August were up 1.2% from a year earlier, compared to 0.7% annual pace in July
  • The economy added 23,800 full-time jobs in August, while part- time employment increased by 57,200.
  • The number of people employed by private sector companies surged 94,300, more than reversing a drop the previous month
  • The employment gain last month was largely in services, which recorded a 73,300 increase

Truly amazing! In one month, employment jumps the equivalent of 830k American jobs and total hours rise 1.2% YoY while real domestic final sales contract in 3 of the last 4 months. As David Rosenberg says, either Canadians’ productivity is sinking or people at Statscan are big users of legal pot.

EARNINGS WATCH

From Refinitiv/IBES:

Through Sep. 6, 497 companies in the S&P 500 Index have reported earnings for Q2 2019. Of these companies, 73.8% reported earnings above analyst expectations and 18.1% reported earnings below analyst expectations. In a typical quarter (since 1994), 65% of companies beat estimates and 20% miss estimates. Over the past four quarters, 76% of companies beat the estimates and 18% missed estimates.

In aggregate, companies are reporting earnings that are 5.6% above estimates, which compares to a long-term (since 1994) average surprise factor of 3.3% and the average surprise factor over the prior four quarters of 5.3%.

Of these companies, 56.7% reported earnings above analyst expectations and 43.3% reported earnings below analyst expectations. In a typical quarter (since 2002), 60% of companies beat estimates and 40% miss estimates. Over the past four quarters, 63% of companies beat the estimates and 37% missed estimates.

In aggregate, companies are reporting earnings that are 1.0% above estimates, which compares to a long-term (since 2002) average surprise factor of 1.5% and the average surprise factor over the prior four quarters of 1.0%.

The estimated earnings growth rate for the S&P 500 for 19Q2 is 3.2%. If the energy sector is excluded, the growth rate improves to 3.9%.

The estimated revenue growth rate for the S&P 500 for 19Q2 is 4.7%. If the energy sector is excluded, the growth rate improves to 5.1%.

The estimated earnings growth rate for the S&P 500 for 19Q3 is -2.0%. If the energy sector is excluded, the growth rate improves to -0.3%.

The estimated growth rate for Q3 was 0.8% on July 1.

Analysts keep revising down but larger caps have taken more of the negative hits in the last 2 weeks: 57% of large cap revisions were negative versus 48% for smaller caps.

image

image

Downward revisions have been especially large on Energy companies as the price of WTI is down 9% from its Q2 average and 20% YoY (-11.8% in Q2 and –12.8% in Q1).

Interestingly, preannouncements for Q3 are arriving in line with last year and much better than at the same time during Q2’19.

image

Lower oil prices could help save the quarter as the S&P 500 contains a lot more oil consumers (including consumer-centric companies) than oil producers (Energy producers contribute 4.5% to total S&P 500 profits).

Trailing EPS are now $164.44, up only 0.3% from their end of May level but up 7.5% YoY.

TECHNICALS WATCH

Lowry’s Research says that “in recent days, Buying Power has risen above the level of late July, when prices were appreciably higher. This sustained trend of improving Demand suggests prices are set to continue rising. (…) Thus, the probabilities are that the move by the market to a new rally high above the top of last month’s trading range is not simply a short term reaction to a positive news event. Rather the rally likely represents the end result of a process of accumulation and strengthening Demand sufficient to support a sustainable advance with the potential to carry the market to new all-time highs in the weeks ahead.”

image

JP Morgan has created an index to track the effect of Trump’s tweets on financial markets: ‘Volfefe index’

J.P. Morgan found that the index, named after Trump’s infamous and still mysterious “covfefe” tweet, explains a measurable fraction of the moves in implied rate volatility for 2-year and 5-year Treasurys. (…)

Since his election in 2016, Trump has averaged more than 10 tweets a day to his nearly 64 million followers —roughly 14,000 total over that period associated with his personal account, of which more than 10,000 occurred after the 2017 inauguration. (…)

Most of Trump’s tweets come around noon to 2:00 pm, with a 1:00 pm tweet roughly three times as likely to arrive at any other hour of the afternoon or evening, according to J.P. Morgan’s report.

Trump’s 3:00 am tweets are also more common than 3:00 pm tweets, which can be a nuisance for U.S. rates markets, since overnight market depth tends to be thin.Trump is presumably asleep from 5:00 am to 10:00 am, according to the report, since there’s a lull in tweeting activity during that time.

Days when Trump tweets a lot are also associated with negative stock market returns, according to Bank of America Merrill Lynch. (…)

WeWork Parent Weighs Further Cut to Its Valuation We Co. is eyeing a valuation for its initial public offering that could fall below $20 billion as some existing investors push the workspace company to shelve the planned offering.

(…) Should We yank or postpone the IPO, it stands to miss out on nearly $10 billion needed to fund its ambitious but money-losing global-growth plans. The company was planning to raise $3 billion to $4 billion in the IPO and up to $6 billion in debt that is contingent on the IPO raising at least $3 billion.

If the IPO doesn’t happen, the company will either need to find more cash or scale back its plans for further growth, according to people close to the company. One problem is that We has long been betting its main appeal to investors is its rapid growth, but that growth is fueled by ever-growing helpings of cash.

We primarily rents space through long-term leases, renovates it and then divides the offices and subleases them over the short term. (…)

This is getting messy. I did not spend the time to get all the numbers right but Softbank/Vision Fund have been kind of self boosting their own valuation buying We shares at higher and higher valuations they hoped the public market would eventually more than validate. That did not work out too well with Uber, now selling 22% below IPO. There are a lot of $billions in this. From some of my readings, Softbank/Vision Fund could need to revalue (read devalue) their own valuation which would then trickle down to all private investors, including many mutual funds.

In the Race to Dominate 5G, China Has an Edge The super-fast wireless technology 5G is expected to revolutionize everything from driving to surgery, and everybody wants to be first. Beijing is using its authoritarian power to clear obstacles on the ground

(…) As it did in constructing its high-speed rail network and Olympic Games infrastructure, the Chinese government has flexed its authoritarian, top-down power to clear red tape for a 5G project that it deems a national priority. It has directed regulators, provincial and local governments and its three major state-owned wireless carriers to work together.

In the U.S., where residents are prone to complain loudly about new cellphone towers going up next door, Washington’s strategy is far from unified. The White House hasn’t taken an important step to clear the military from valuable 5G airwaves, while measures from the Federal Communications Commission meant to fast-track 5G have actually created infighting among Washington, municipal governments and private wireless carriers, which are now suing one another. (…)

“By the end of this year, it’s clear that China will have more 5G than any other place on the planet, and by the end of 2020, they’ll have 100 million 5G users,” said Chris Lane, a Bernstein analyst and former strategy director for Vodafone Group PLC, the world’s No. 2 wireless carrier by subscribers behind China Mobile. “That’s far more than any other country.”

(…) 5G could turbocharge some Chinese companies. It might also help China’s efforts to stem a scientific brain drain that has led some of its brightest students to study abroad and then stay there.

“If you’re a scientist, where do you want to do it?” said retired Gen. Robert Spalding, who was essentially forced out of the White House’s National Security Council last year after proposing that the federal government play a bigger role in managing America’s 5G build-out. “You want to do it where they’re doing the research and have the money.” (…)

U.S. wireless providers are expected to outspend their Chinese counterparts on 5G capital expenses, $284 billion to $179.8 billion, from 2018 to 2025, according to data from GSMAi, the research arm of a global wireless trade group. But because it’s so much cheaper to build 5G in China, that country is projected to have five to 10 times as many major cellular sites over the next five years, said Stefan Pongratz, an analyst at telecom research-firm Dell’Oro Group. (…)

In the U.S., wireless carriers spend billions in Washington-run auctions for radio frequencies, or spectrum, for 5G. Then they spend billions more to lease real estate for cellular towers. Then they spend billions on top of that to build the actual towers and put hardware on them.

Beijing gives its carriers the spectrum and real estate—the government decides land-use rights in China—at a low price. And it is employing strategies that make efficient use of both.

(…) One cellular tower in China can cover the same area as 100 high-speed American ones.

“Spectrum is very important in determining the costs of 5G,” said Huawei global vice president Daisy Zhu. “The U.S. has a problem with spectrum.”

(…) “There’s an unwillingness to share by the utilities,” said Ken Schmidt, head of Steel in the Air, a wireless-infrastructure valuation firm. “Without the sharing, it’s going to significantly limit the expansion of 5G outside dense urban areas for the next five years.” Mr. Schmidt said carriers are finding it faster just to build new towers. (…)

In the U.S., about 95% of the grounds and rooftops suitable for cellular towers are privately owned, Mr. Schmidt said, with the average rent for a ground lease around $1,300 a month. The timeline from finding a location to having a working tower typically takes between one and six months, but in rare cases can stretch to two years, he said. The biggest delay is obtaining zoning permits from municipal governments, despite FCC efforts to speed up the process. (…)

And then there’s the cost of the telecom equipment itself, which includes the radios hanging on towers that wirelessly communicate with phones, as well as the giant routers and switches in climate-controlled rooms that make sure data gets to the right place. Telecom carriers spend $80 billion a year on it, and Huawei is the world’s biggest maker of the stuff by far. Its hardware is often more advanced and cheaper—by 20% or more—than equipment from Western rivals, say European wireless-carrier executives. (…)

Samsung Electronics Co. and Huawei Technologies Co. took turns announcing new mobile processors at the IFA technology show in Berlin last week, and the big thing the new chips have in common is an integrated 5G modem.

In a market dominated by U.S. rival Qualcomm Inc., the world’s two biggest smartphone manufacturers asserted a lead in delivering one of the keys to unlocking widespread availability of 5G devices. A system-on-chip that integrates the applications processor and a fifth-generation wireless modem significantly reduces the space and power requirements compared to existing solutions that use two separate chips.

Qualcomm has such models on its 2020 road map, but this past week Samsung announced it’s planning mass production for its alternative at the end of 2019 and Huawei is moving even faster, promising to release its most advanced processor with the Mate 30 Pro smartphone on Sept. 19. (…)

The silver lining to the trade war for Qualcomm, however, is that Huawei’s Mate 30 Pro will struggle to sell in Europe so long as the Trump administration prevents it from offering Google services on new phones. Irrespective of how fast and advanced its Kirin 990 5G may be, the trade war will prevent Huawei from fully capitalizing on its capabilities and may, in fact, push the company to license the chip out to other smartphone vendors, such as Lenovo Group, which is not subject to the same sanctions.

If the U.S. keeps Huawei on its blacklist, preventing it from buying American technology, the company faces further chip challenges. To develop successors to the Kirin 990, it needs to license the latest designs from SoftBank Group’s ARM, but that company discontinued work with Huawei because of the U.S. ban.

    What China Has and Hasn’t Done to Address U.S. Trade Gripes