The enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it’s the illusion of knowledge (Stephen Hawking)

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so (Mark Twain)

Invest with smart knowledge and objective odds

THE DAILY EDGE (27 February 2017): Earnings Watch

U.S. New-Home Sales Rose 3.7% in January New home sales rebounded in January after a steep decline in December, an indication that the new-construction market remains on the path to recovery despite bumps along the way.

Purchases of newly built, single-family houses, which account for a small share of overall U.S. home sales, increased 3.7% from December to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 555,000 last month, the Commerce Department said Friday.

The data was clouded, however, by a margin of error of 18.5 percentage points that is much larger than the reported increase. A 15.8% increase in Northeast sales led the pack last month, but that figure had a margin of error of 79.3 percentage points. (…)

The 12-month rolling total of new homes sold, which helps smooth out some of the monthly volatility, is up 12% year-over-year, according to Ralph McLaughlin, chief economist at Trulia.

“We’re seeing new-home sales climb pretty solidly month after month,” he said. New-home sales are now at about 85% of their 50-year norm, according to Mr. McLaughlin, although that doesn’t account for population growth. (…)

Single-family construction climbed 1.9% in January, while multifamily construction tumbled 10.2%.

Inventory of new homes available for sale climbed sharply in January to the highest level since September 2009 (…)

Executives at Toll Brothers said on a recent investor call that contracts for new homes were up 42% in January compared with a year earlier. (…)

 large image large image

(Haver Analytics)

  • Sales were up 5.5% year-over-year in January,  However, January and February were the weakest months last year on a seasonally adjusted annual rate basis – so this was an easy comparison. Note that these sales (for January) occurred after mortgage rates increased following the election. (CalculatedRisk)
  • The Census Bureau’s mid-month population estimates show a 72.6% increase in the US population since 1963. Here is a chart of new home sales as a percent of the population. (Doug Short)

Population Adjusted

  • The cost of rent in the US is expected to keep rising faster than the rate of inflation or wages. The biggest increases are taking place in the “affordable” multifamily rentals (i.e. those for working households – labeled “Workforce”). (The Daily Shot)

Source: Fannie Mae, @joshdigga

Mall Closures Ripple Through Small-Town America

(…) Specialty retailers such as the Limited and department stores such as Sears and Macy’s in recent months have announced plans to close hundreds of stores nationwide and slash jobs as online shopping takes a growing share of revenue. (…)

Malls in smaller U.S. cities are often linchpins of local economies and their struggles can have a ripple effect, from jobs and tax revenues to the fortunes of logistics and transportation companies that provide trucking and inventory support for stores. Creditors who invest in mortgage securities tied to troubled malls face the risk of default. (…)

Economic Surveys Show Deep Splits in Confidence Along Party Lines Since the election of President Donald Trump, consumer confidence and sentiment surveys that ask participants about the health of the economy have seen their responses divided like never before along partisan lines.
 

(…) Three big drivers of business enthusiasm have been hopes for corporate tax reform, less regulation and the prospect of major infrastructure spending that could flood manufacturers and construction firms with work. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin has said that tax reform could take until August. Regulations could also take years to roll back. Meantime, the details of an infrastructure package have yet to emerge, and even once enacted such projects take a notoriously long time.

Investors, like Republicans, are inferring in Mr. Trump a high probability of success despite obstacles he faces. The stock market is up more than 10% since the election. Andrew Liveris, chief executive of Dow Chemical Co., participated in a roundtable of business leaders who met with Mr. Trump last week. Afterward, he said “to have the U.S. government speak the language of business is a completely new experience.”

In the end, expectations will need to square up with the economy’s real performance.

Source: Gary Cohn says no go on border adjustment tax

Gary Cohn, chief economic advisor to President Trump, told a group of CEOs this morning that the White House does not support the House GOP version of a border adjustment tax, according to an attendee.

The comment was made while Cohn was being interviewed by The Carlyle Group CEO David Rubenstein, at a private event hosted by The Business Council in Washington, D.C. It also comes less than 24 hours after Trump indicated some support for the House language, in a conversation with Reuters.

UPDATE: The White House is disputing this report, issuing the following statement: “There is no daylight between Gary Cohn and the President. His comment was taken out of context as it was part of a broader conversation about the proposals that are connected to border adjustability. At no point during this conversation did Gary make a statement of support or opposition to the House border adjustability plan.”

The White House declined to make audio of Cohn’s comments available to Axios, citing the confidentiality of the Business Council session.

Hmmm…This is bordering on inside information.

Anyway, where will the money come from to finance the tax reform?

Bank Lending Signals Caution

Total loans and leases by U.S. commercial banks are currently rising at an annual pace of about 5%, based on weekly seasonally adjusted data from the Federal Reserve. That is down from a 6.4% pace for all of last year and peak rates of around 8% in mid-2016.

The deceleration has been broad-based across business, real estate and consumer lending and is at odds with the idea of a stronger economy and rising sentiment. The slowdown has been particularly stark in commercial and industrial lending, which was growing at around 10% in the first half of last year, but is now up just 5.7% from a year earlier.

There are two possible causes, says Barclays analyst Jason Goldberg. One is that companies are selling more bonds to lock in cheap financing before rates rise. (…)

The other, more worrisome explanation is that political uncertainty is causing companies and banks to put off big decisions until the outlook for trade and tax policy is clearer. The lending slowdown began showing up clearly just before the election last year. (…)

Just kidding Nobody should be surprised that companies put some spending projects on hold pending the eventual tax reform.

World Trade Flows Grew at Slowest Pace Since Financial Crisis International trade flows grew at the slowest pace since the financial crisis in 2016, but there were signs of a modest pickup as the year drew to a close.

The Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis said on Friday that the volume of exports and imports of goods was 1.2% higher than in 2015, marking a slowdown from the 2% rate of growth recorded in the preceding year and the smallest rise since volumes crashed in 2009.

However, there were signs exports and imports might be reviving, with volumes up 1.1% in the final three months of the year compared with the third quarter, almost double the rate of increase in the three months to September. (…)

Over the longer term, world trade has usually grown at 1.5 times the rate of total economic output. During the period of rapid globalization in the 1990s, trade grew at twice the rate of economic output.

However, it appears to have grown more slowly than total output in 2016. (…)

“The rise of protectionism is more likely to accelerate than slow down,” Raoul Leering, head of international trade research at ING Bank, said. “The uncertainty around possible import tariffs by the U.S. also leads to a ‘wait and see’ attitude of companies with regard to offshoring, another driver of trade.” (…)

Amid much gloom, there are some positives for world trade. An international agreement to streamline the movement of goods across borders came into force Thursday, cutting trade costs by 14.3%, according to the World Trade Organization. The Trade Facilitation Agreement should make it more affordable for smaller firms to engage in trade. (…)

NBF adds this:

Emerging markets saw industrial output outpacing exports by the largest margin in four years. Unless all of that extra output was absorbed by domestic demand (which is unlikely), the stagnation of exports means already-bloated inventories grew further in emerging economies. As today’s Hot Charts show, the ratio of industrial production to exports at the end of 2016 was close to levels reached during the Great Recession of 2008-09. That could cap production and hence economic growth in emerging markets in the early parts of 2017.

image

The Trump administration is exploring alternatives to taking trade disputes to the World Trade Organisation in what would amount to the first step away from a system that Washington helped to establish more than two decades ago. (…)

Since being established in 1995 the WTO has become the pre-eminent venue for resolving trade fights between member countries, which its proponents say has helped prevent destructive trade wars. While the US would remain a WTO member under the Trump administration’s plans, the officials’ move reflects the sceptical view many of them have of an institution they see as a plodding internationalist bureaucracy biased against US interests. (…)

INFLATION WATCH

For the first time in almost four years, none of the eurozone’s 19 members was in deflation during January, an encouragement to the European Central Bank in its long struggle to lift inflation to its target and keep it there.

The European Union’s statistics agency Wednesday confirmed an earlier estimate that showed consumer prices in the currency area were 1.8% higher than a year earlier, a jump from the 1.1% inflation rate recorded in December 2016 and within touching distance of the ECB’s target, which is close to, but below 2%. (…)

In inflation-averse Germany, prices were 1.9% higher than a year earlier in January, amplifying calls for an end to ECB stimulus. The central bank has said it won’t consider a tapering of its stimulus programs until it is clear that inflation will remain around its target, even after energy prices have stopped rising. That would requires a pickup in the pace at which prices of other goods and services are rising. However, there were few, if any, signs of a buildup in underlying inflationary pressures during January. The core rate of inflation, which excludes energy, food, alcohol and tobacco, was unchanged at 0.9%, and lower than in January 2016. (…)

image

Something strange happened in January. MoM food and energy prices rose but prices of just about everything else collapsed, including services prices.

image

  • Canadian CPI surprised to the upside as inflation strengthens globally. (The Daily Shot)

  • UK’s retailers are planning a sizeable price increase, driven by the pound’s weakness. (The Daily Shot)

Source: @Not_Jim_Cramer

(…) retail sales contracted in January by 0.3% from the previous month, the Office for National Statistics said Friday, dragging the annual rate of growth down to 1.5%, the weakest expansion in more than three years. (…)

The January slowdown was driven to a large extent by rising prices for fuel and food, the ONS said. Sterling has lost around 15% against the dollar since the referendum result, a decline that is fueling a surge in inflation: Consumer prices rose 1.8% in January, the fastest rate of growth in 2 ½ years, and the Bank of England expects annual inflation to overshoot its 2% target within months. (…)

Average wages after inflation grew by merely 1.4% in the three months to December, the slowest pace of growth in two years. (…)

EARNINGS WATCH
  • With 92% of the companies in the S&P 500 having reported Q4’16, Factset calculates that 66% of S&P 500 companies have beat the mean EPS estimate and 52% of S&P 500 companies have beat the mean sales estimate.
  • Earnings Growth for Q4’16 is 4.9% vs +3.1% expected on Dec. 31 2016. Thomson Reuters/IBES is at +7.7% for Q4.
  • So the Q4 earnings season started with a bang but ended only so-so with the beat rate well below last year’s 71% and the EPS surprise totalling +1.8% (+2.9% last week), much lower than the 1-year (+4.4%) average and below the 5-year (+4.2%) average. TR’s surprise factor is at +2.2%.
image
  • Earnings Guidance for Q1 2017 shows that 67 S&P 500 companies have issued negative EPS guidance and 31 companies have issued positive EPS guidance. IT companies provided 34 of the 98 warnings with 18 of the 34 being positive. Ex-IT, 51 of the 64 companies providing guidance have guided negatively (80%).
  • Factset now sees Q1’17 EPS up 9.3%, unchanged from last week but down from +12.5% on Dec. 31. TR is at +10.5% for Q1’17.

image

  • Interesting to see Industrials’ Q1 estimates down from +0.6% last Dec. 31 to –5.7%. This while the sub-index rose 16% since Nov. 8 and 5% since Dec. 31.
  • TR’s tally shows that estimate revisions remain somewhat negative for S&P 500 companies but are deteriorating at a faster pace for the all U.S. companies.

imageimage

Something needs to change course on this chart from Lance Roberts:

The Rule of 20 P/E is now 22.3. Did you miss DEEP INTO THE TWILIGHT ZONE?

image
SENTIMENT WATCH

(…) But other than paying high prices, investors aren’t behaving at all the way they typically do during bubbles.

One hallmark of a bubble is that stock trading becomes frenzied. In 1999, trading volume rose sharply, and dot-com stocks made up to 20% of the shares exchanging hands. But trading is looking pretty staid at the moment—indeed, daily volume since Mr. Trump was elected is below its year-earlier level.

Another bubble tell: Leverage. When irrational exuberance take hold, investors buy more stock using borrowed money in hopes of magnifying their gains. Margin debt is up, but as a share of the stock market’s value it has remained steady. In the dot-com bubble, it shot higher. (…)

Joe Public is generally late at the party and is the one pushing volumes and indices higher near the peaks. But Joe is already up to his ears in equities per this Ned Davis chart (via Evergreen/Gavekal):

WHEN INVESTORS HAVE HIGH STOCK ALLOCATIONS, LOW RETURNS ARE INEVITABLE

But Joe is busy moving away from expensive mutual funds to ETFs and robots which contribute to the trend:

(…) Four leading robo-advisers — Betterment, Schwab Intelligent Portfolios, Vanguard Portfolio Advisory Services and Wealthfront — have roughly doubled their assets in the past year, to $77 billion.

In 2016, 82% of new retail investments coming through financial advisers (more than $400 billion) went into index funds and ETFs, according to Broadridge Financial Solutions, which helps process such trading.

All told, U.S.-based exchange-traded portfolios have amassed $2.6 trillion, says ETFGI, a research group in London. Target-date funds hold $915 billion, according to Morningstar, the investment-research firm.

We — including financial journalists, like me — have created a new breed. Today’s investors aren’t what the financial analyst Benjamin Graham described as “enterprising,” or willing to put time and energy into the search for bargains.

Instead, investors buy and hold (or at least intend to) regardless of whether entire markets are undervalued or overpriced.

“There’s an automaticity of investing here,” says the Investment Company Institute’s chief economist, Brian Reid, “where the vast majority of assets seem to stay in place.”

In short, the moralistic and puritanical view of investing that has prevailed for decades — how well you succeed at it is determined by how hard you work at it — is being replaced by an agnostic model in which you hope to succeed by clicking and letting it ride.

Benjamin Graham also warned that “there are no sure and easy paths to riches on Wall Street or anywhere else.” So it’s tempting to conclude that when we make investing effortless — and, frankly, mindless — we make it more dangerous.

In the late 1960s, Wall Street strategists argued that a flood of money from pension plans would drive stocks irresistibly higher. The favorite shares were called “one-decision stocks”: Your only choice was how much of them to buy. You’d never need to consider selling. The 37% crash of 1973-74 stifled that argument. (…)

“GURU” STUFF:

Nerd smile From Barron’s interview with Davis Rosenberg:

  • Last year, the first of the boomers turned 70, and there will be 1½ million boomers turning 70 in each of the next 15 years. That is where the wealth and power still reside. But the other part is that some of the data shows that half of the boomers now heading into retirement have savings of $100,000 or less. In this segment of the population we have a savings crisis. A lot of these people have taken on student debt to help their children and grandchildren.
  • The markets have given the administration the benefit of the doubt. The question is, how much patience does Mr. Market have, because it is very clear that there is no agreement on the border-adjustment tax, there is no broad agreement among House Republicans about whether tax reform should be revenue neutral, and if not, how far would we drive the deficit up?
  • When you get three things together—a sub-11 VIX [the CBOE Volatility Index], an 18 forward multiple, and 60%-plus bulls in Investors Intelligence— and you look at the history, you’ll see that upside to this market is extremely limited. Volatility and uncertainty are underpriced. There will be better buying opportunities this year. Are we going into a bear market? No. We will have a flattish year, with a tremendous amount of volatility. Fiscal policy is as tapped out as monetary policy is.

More from Rosy via Lance Roberts’ Visualizing 10-Reasons For Caution.

Nerd smile Gundlach expects U.S. 10-year T-note yield to drop below 2.25 percent Jeffrey Gundlach, chief executive of DoubleLine Capital, said on Friday he expects the yield on the benchmark 10-year U.S. Treasury note to drop below 2.25 percent as global investors seek safety.

(…) “There is a stealth flight to safety going on. German bond yields are leading the way down,” Gundlach said in emailed comments. “Gold is rising. Speculators remain massively short bonds and the market is going to squeeze them out.” (…)

Gundlach noted: “Stocks are out of synch with the stealth flight to safety. Lots of hope built in.” (…)

Nerd smile Lessons From the Oracle: Warren Buffett’s Annual Letter, Annotated
TECHNICAL STUFF

I am not a big fan of technical stuff but Lowry’s does intelligent analysis. Their latest comment is very bullish: their demand/supply calculations show expanding demand and contracting supply, their market breadth measure is positive among all caps and their new highs vs new lows trends show “few signs of a weakening primary uptrend”.

I pay attention to the 200-day m.a.: it is still rising but the step back to the mean is getting steeper. Financials (18.4%) and IT (12.4%) are particularly high vs their 200-d. m.a.

image

Lance Roberts has this chart on the same gap measure:

And this other one:

The chart below brings this idea of reversion into a bit clearer focus. I have overlaid the 3-year average annual real return of the S&P 500 against the inflation-adjusted price index itself.

Historically, we find that when price extensions have exceeded a 12% deviation from the 3-year average return of the index, the majority of the market cycle had been completed. While this analysis does NOT mean the market is set to crash, it does suggest that a reversion in returns is likely. Unfortunately, the historical reversion in returns has often coincided at some juncture with a rather sharp decline in prices.

Facing Criticism, Drug Makers Keep Lid On Price Increases This year, pharmaceutical companies didn’t raise prices for as many drugs as last year and imposed fewer boosts of 10% or more, worried about the potential for a political and public backlash. Among the critics they face is President Trump.

About 5.5% of the increases reached the 10% level. A year ago, 15% did, and two years ago, 20% did. Even so, the median drug-price increase was little changed from last year, at 8.9%, still far above the U.S. inflation rate of around 2%. (…)

In all, producers raised the U.S. list prices of 2,353 prescription drugs in January. That was about a quarter fewer than in January 2016, according to Raymond James, which based its analysis on prices known as the “wholesale-acquisition cost.”

In the drug industry, “price increases have become a substitute for innovation,” said the CEO of Inc.,Leonard Schleifer, in an interview. “If we continue to go crazy with price increases, the government will have to step in.” Regeneron hasn’t raised prices on its three drugs since their launch. (…)

The industry has moved to restrain price increases before. Early in the Clinton administration, worried about a risk of price controls, the main pharmaceutical-industry trade group pledged to limit increases to the consumer inflation rate.

Such self-policing “has never been long-lasting,” Goldman Sachs wrote in a note to clients this past September, adding: “Price increases have become an industrywide practice, especially since 2010, when reliance on higher price increases” for revenue growth intensified.

Exclusive: Wal-Mart launches new front in U.S. price war, targets Aldi in grocery aisle Wal-Mart Stores Inc is running a new price-comparison test in at least 1,200 U.S. stores and squeezing packaged goods suppliers in a bid to close a pricing gap with German-based discount grocery chain Aldi and other U.S. rivals like Kroger Co , according to four sources familiar with the moves.

NEW$ & VIEW$ (24 SEPTEMBER 2015): Fed Open Mouth Committee; Lower Inflation; Lower Sentiment

Fed Chair Janet Yellen’s speech at 5 p.m. may help investors understand what circumstances the Fed needs to see if it is to move ahead with a rate increase this year — and whether continued market volatility, including the selloff in global equities in the past week, is an obstacle to a 2015 liftoff.

The Fed’s stately building seems to have been replaced by a modern Tower of Babel with various speakers’ dissonant voices causing great uncertainty in the financial markets.

Gavyn Davies: A catch-22 for the Fed

(…) Mainly because of the rising dollar, the FCI [Financial Conditions Index] has identified a tightening of 200 basis points since last year, and 90 basis points since June 2015. It has actually tightened slightly since last week’s FOMC meeting. Although forward short-term interest rates have dropped by about 10-15 basis points, this has been more than offset by a stronger dollar and weaker equities.

According to Goldman Sachs, the tightening seen in the FCI has already resulted in a reduction in US GDP growth of 0.5 per cent (year on year); and this drag will increase to 0.8 per cent by 2015 Q4. This could explain why the US activity growth rate has fallen recently, according to the Fulcrum “nowcast” models, from 2.5 per cent in July to 1.7 per cent now.

Furthermore, Goldman Sachs calculates that the very recent tightening in the FCI would have the same effect as three quarter-point increases in the federal funds rate. As a result, they conclude that the current stance of the FCI is tighter than optimal, given the normal relationship with the Fed’s objectives for inflation and unemployment. That seems to be Mr Dudley’s view as well.

There is, however, a catch-22 with any attempt to use the FCI as a guide to setting monetary policy. Eventually, if the Fed really does want to tighten policy, it will have to follow through with its threat, or else the markets will undo the rise in the FCI as they realise that the Fed is bluffing. This is a game of chicken, a game with no unique equilibrium.

So how will this infuriating game end? If we are to believe their interest rate projections, a majority on the FOMC wants to press ahead with gradual rates rises, starting this year, regardless of the FCI. In the medium term, this might turn out to be the appropriate path for short-term interest rates. But, for now, given recent events in China, that seems optimistic to the markets. A collision is therefore developing between the Fed’s reluctance to recognise downside economic risks and what the markets want to hear.

Until the majority on the FOMC starts paying more attention to the large tightening in the FCI, the economy may weaken further. That is what the markets are worried about.

FYI, the Atlanta Fed GDPNow model forecast for real GDP growth (seasonally adjusted annual rate) in the third quarter of 2015 is 1.5% on September 17, having been inching up since mid-August.Evolution of Atlanta Fed GDPNow real GDP forecast

U.S. Core Inflation Not Immune to Falling Gas Prices

Economists tend to view core inflation metrics as more valuable gauges of price pressures, as the exclusion of food and energy prices make them less volatile than their headline counterparts. Still, those components can influence the core trend through indirect channels. This is particularly true for energy prices, with energy-sensitive production and transportation costs often factored into the final prices paid by consumers. The continuing drop in prices at the pump could steal momentum from an otherwise improving core inflation trend — and at a critical juncture for monetary policy makers no less.

(…) Gas prices have a distinct seasonality, and based on the average over the past 10 years, prices typically decline an additional 13 percent from September through year-end. That means there is a strong possibility that prices could head further toward $2.00 per gallon around year-end.

The correlation between rates of change in retail gasoline prices and core inflation illustrate the substantial second-order effects from the former to the latter. This is demonstrated in the accompanying figure. (Note that moving averages are used to reduce noise.)  As it takes time for these effects to percolate through to final prices, the gas price trend leads core inflation by several months.

The correlation between the adjusted moving averages for gas and core CPI is an impressive 70 percent. For the core PCE deflator, it is a lesser, albeit still significant, 45 percent. That suggests there is a distinct possibility that low and falling gasoline prices could nudge core inflation lower through year-end and into early 2016. A simple linear regression of the series suggests that core CPI could drift from 1.8 percent in July and August down toward 1.6 percent in the first quarter of next year. The implication is less compelling for the core PCE deflator given the lower correlation coefficient.

Nonetheless, a similar regression suggests this series will remain near the current level of 1.3 percent into the new year.

While there are many other factors at play with core inflation — including rental pressures, currency effects and a tightening labor market — knock-on effects from cheap energy prices appear poised to at least partly offset an emerging upward bias in the coming months. Policy makers have repeatedly indicated that they would be willing to look beyond transitory factors as they assess the appropriate timing for policy normalization. But if core inflation appears to have stalled, the case for liftoff will be more difficult.

The latest Markit manufacturing PMI survey shows that prices of manufactured goods are now deflating in the U.S.

From the same survey, I find this chart intriguing. U.S. new export orders have climbed back above 50 in the face of a strengthening dollar.

image

Volkswagen could pose bigger threat to German economy than Greek crisis The Volkswagen emissions scandal has rocked Germany’s business and political establishment and analysts warn the crisis at the car maker could develop into the biggest threat to Europe’s largest economy.

Volkswagen is the biggest of Germany’s car makers and one of the country’s largest employers, with more than 270,000 jobs in its home country and even more working for suppliers. (…)

“If Volkswagen’s sales were to plunge in North America in the coming months, this would not only have an impact on the company, but on the German economy as a whole,” he added.

Volkswagen sold nearly 600,000 cars in the United States last year, around 6 percent of its 9.5 million global sales. (…)

In 2014, roughly 775,000 people worked in the German automobile sector. This is nearly two percent of the whole workforce. (…)

In addition, automobiles and car parts are Germany’s most successful export — the sector sold goods worth more than 200 billion euros ($225 billion) to customers abroad in 2014, accounting for nearly a fifth of total German exports. (…)

Disinflation washes up in Vietnam Nation once known for hyperinflation joins the 0% brigade

(…) Consumer price inflation in Vietnam, whose multi-zero banknotes are testament to years of hyperinflation, fell short of market forecasts for a rise of 0.8 per cent in September. The zero reading was the lowest in almost 10 years of data. (…)

After China devalued the renminbi on August 11, Vietnam responded by widening the trading band for the dong, twice, from 1 per cent to 3 per cent, to allow the currency to fall and support exports. The currency has since lost 3 per cent to 22,486 per dollar.

Nguyen Bich Lam, head of the General Statistics Office, said those moves should lift CPI by 0.7 per cent by year-end. He said Vietnam should aim for 5-8 per cent inflation to support growth.

The fall in inflation is mostly a result of the drop in oil prices. Prices in the transport category were down 13.1 per cent over 12 months. But food prices were also down 1.8 per cent and housing and construction material prices were down 1.7 per cent.

Debt Relief Snarls Market for Student Loans Federal programs designed to ease the burden of college loans are causing snarls in the bond market and raising concerns that banks may soon ratchet back lending.

The programs, which let struggling borrowers scale back their repayments, have made student loans more affordable at a time when millions of Americans are falling behind on their student debts. (…)

Credit rating firms Moody’s Investors Service Inc. and Fitch Ratings Inc. have collectively placed more than $36 billion worth of bonds backed by student loans on watch for a possible downgrade, warning it is increasingly likely that borrowers won’t pay their loans off in full by their original due dates and that bonds backed by those loans could end up in default.

The result is that investors are demanding better prices in the esoteric but crucial market where banks raise capital by selling or repackaging their loans. (…)

Moody’s is expected to make a decision on whether to downgrade the bonds as early as November. (…)

As of June, there were $371 billion of FFELP loans outstanding, according to the Education Department. Overall, there are $1.27 trillion of outstanding student loans, 93% of which are federally backed, according to MeasureOne, a San Francisco-based firm that tracks the student loan market. (…)

Moody’s has put $34 billion of these bonds on watch for a downgrade this year through June. Since then, Navient’s shares have tumbled about 35%.

Navient was the largest buyer of FFELP student loans last year, purchasing $11.3 billion of these loans from banks and other institutions, according to the company. Wells Fargo& Co., the second-largest private student loan originator by volume, sold $8.5 billion of FFELP loans to Navient late last year. (…)

J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. had more than $4.5 billion of the federal student loans on its books as of June, according to bank filings, with some $500 million in delinquency or default. A bank spokeswoman said it has no plans to sell these loans at this time. SunTrust Banks held $4.4 billion of these loans as of June. A bank spokesman declined to comment on future plans for its loan holdings.

Fracking Firms That Drove Oil Boom Struggle to Survive A wave of bankruptcies and closures is sweeping across the oil patch, and dozens of the mostly small, privately owned hydraulic-fracturing companies that help oil-and-gas explorers drill and frack wells are at risk.

Most of the companies that help oil-and-gas explorers drill and frack wells are small, privately owned and just a few years old. They are part of a flood of new entrants in the energy business—one that is drying up as oil prices languish below $50 a barrel. (…)

At least five frackers have filed for bankruptcy, stopped fracking, or shut their doors altogether, according to consulting firm IHS Energy. Other analysts say that number may be higher, and they expect many more companies to follow suit or consolidate in a merger frenzy.

Energy analysts at Wells Fargo & Co. say as much as half of the available fracking capacity in the U.S. is sitting idle. (…)

So far this year, the amount of fracking work has fallen about 40% from a year earlier, and the price of a frack job has fallen 35%, according to Spears & Associates, a consulting firm for oil-service companies. (…)

Gasoline Volume Sales

Because the sales data are highly volatile with some obvious seasonality, we’ve added a 12-month moving average (MA) to give a clearer indication of the long-term trends. The latest 12-month MA is 6.1% below the all-time high set in August 2005 but off the -8.9% interim low set in August 2014.

image

The 6.1% drop highlighted is from the 2005 peak. I am more interested in the more recent trend which is clearly up. The recent monthly data circled in red are well above anything seen since 2010.

SENTIMENT WATCH
Ghost Louise Yamada: Major Sell Signals on All Indices

“We’ve been progressively more cautious and this month we became even more cautious…because we have major monthly sell signals in place for all of the indices… [H]istorically if we look back we got one of these monthly sell signals in January of 2008 and in June of 2000 so we tend to take them rather seriously. The next thing we are waiting for is a crossover of the monthly moving averages and we use a 10-month and a 20-month moving average, which would be a monthly death cross if you will. Everybody is talking about that…and the New York Stock Exchange just this week has been the first one to register that cross under of the 10-month moving average under the 20-month so that death cross is in place for one of the indices. I think that things are becoming much more fragile.”

“There’s a good possibility that we see a 20% decline, which is defined as a bear market or slightly more than that. Whether it’s cyclical or structural has yet to be determined but for instance if the S&P, which is already down around 10%, were to come down another 10% you’d take it right back to 1600, which, ironically, is the breakout point through the 2000 and 2008 peaks, which was broken through on the upside in 2013. So a pullback to that breakout level would be a perfectly normal cyclical bear market in what presumably would be an ongoing bull market, just as we saw cyclical bear markets in the course of the 1982-2000 bull market.”

“[T]his is the first time that a continuation of easing, so to speak, was greeted by disappointment in the market… Whenever the Fed offers liquidity the markets tend to go up and interestingly here they’ve maintained some sort of liquidity by not tightening…and that’s been greeted negatively for the first time I think.”

“We have some monthly sell signals on a variety of the international markets and we’re watching carefully to see whether that begins to spread to the rest of the ones that have been looking good. Japan had been looking good. Germany had been looking good. India had been looking good. But if we start to see that we’re losing that leadership and getting sell signals for those major markets joining a lot of the other emerging nations, we would be raising our antenna a little bit more. I think that’s definitely part of what was on Yellen’s mind the other day.” (…)

“I have no problem staying in cash. Preservation of capital…this is not a good environment in which to initiate positions. I think you really need to wait and see where the dust settles. We have an enormous number of stocks that are down already 20-80%. The larger declines are obviously in the energy area and once you’ve had that kind of decline you’re not going to go to new highs anytime soon. And that’s a fair amount of S&P capitalization weight that’s damaged and when you have that kind of damage it’s going to take time before one is going to benefit on a sustainable basis by being involved.”

“I would wait until we have evidence that all of these sell signals are false, which I don’t think we are going to get. But the point is, time will tell. We would need to see the advance-decline line move to a new high; we’d need to see these monthly sell signals reverse, which could happen in a period of 3-4 months as it did in 2011 even though you had almost a 20% decline there for the S&P and the Dow but these signals are not only in place but the momentum is declining which did not happen in 2011…so I think we are looking at something a little bit more serious in this environment.”

Goldman Says Copper Bear Market to Last Years as Gluts Build

Copper will slump as the U.S. Federal Reserve starts to raise interest rates, demand growth stalls in China and stockpiles surge, according to Goldman Sachs Group Inc., which stood by a year-end forecast that signals the biggest annual drop since the globalfinancial crisis.

Prices will probably drop to $4,800 a metric ton by the end of December and $4,500 at the end of next year, analysts including Max Layton and Jeffery Currie wrote in a report. The metal traded at $5,080 at 7:44 a.m. in London. A drop to Goldman’s end-2015 target implies a full-year retreat of 24 percent, the most since the 54 percent plunge in 2008.

“We see a long list of potential catalysts for copper’s next major move lower,” Layton, Currie and Yubin Fu wrote in the note received on Thursday. Of particular importance for copper has been the weakness in China, which points to a hard landing for commodities demand during 2015, they said. (…)

There will be about 530,000 tons more global supply than demand in 2016, Goldman said, paring its estimate from about 670,000 tons. The worldwide surplus was seen at 566,000 tons in 2017, 626,000 tons in 2018 and 657,000 tons in 2019, it said. (…)

Global stockpiles were seen increasing by as much as 1 million tons between November and March, Goldman said in the report, which was titled ‘Copper’s bear cycle still has years to run.’ Holdings in LME-tracked warehouses stood 327,175 tons as of Wednesday, according to bourse data. (…)

Confused smile Oh Canada! Four in 10 Americans Want Wall on Northern Border