The enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it’s the illusion of knowledge (Stephen Hawking)

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so (Mark Twain)

Invest with smart knowledge and objective odds

THE DAILY EDGE (18 September 2017): Recession Watch

U.S. Economic Growth Hampered By Recent Hurricanes Retail sales declined 0.2% in August while industrial production both tumbled by 0.9%

A pair of severe hurricanes—Harvey, which hit Texas and Louisiana in late August, and Irma, which struck Florida in early September—are set to jumble economic indicators this fall.

Early evidence came Friday when the Federal Reserve reported that U.S. industrial production dropped a seasonally adjusted 0.9% in August from the prior month, its largest decline since the 2007-09 recession. The Fed said Hurricane Harvey was responsible for most of the decline by depressing oil drilling, petroleum refining and other industrial activity. (…)

The Commerce Department said it couldn’t isolate the effect of Hurricane Harvey on retailers last month.

And just to blur things up even more

Friday’s retail sales report for August was as important as it was bad. Yet, the various media I survey did not make much of it, perhaps thinking it was all Harvey’s fault.

Let’s deal with the easier stuff first:

The Federal Reserve indicated that storm damage curtailed the change in total industrial production, as well as the change in factory sector activity, by roughly 3/4 percentage point during August. Industrial production declined 0.9% last month (+1.6% y/y) following a 0.4% July gain, revised from 0.2%. Factory output fell 0.3% (+1.5% y/y) following no change in July, revised from -0.1%. (…)

That means IP would have decline 0.2% without Harvey, bringing the last 2 months to +0.2% (+1.2% a.r.) and the last 3 months to +0.4% (+1.6% a.r.). Most of the estimated impact from Harvey is in Utilities and Mining (O&G). Trends in most other sectors remain pretty dismal as Haver Analytics table shows:

image

Most worrying is Consumer Goods production which was almost flat in 2016, is down YoY in August and dropped at a 2.8% annualized rate in the last 3 months. American manufacturers of consumer goods have not increased their production since July 2015. Why? Lack of demand!

  • Retail sales in downspin?

Harvey can probably be blamed for a very small part of the 0.2% decline in August retail sales but he claims innocence for all previous months’ reported and revised numbers:

  • On July 17, June retail sales were reported down 0.2% after –0.1% in May. Ex-Autos, ex-gasoline, sales were down 0.1% the first decline in this measure in nearly a year. The U.S. consumer appeared spent out.
  • On August 15, July retail sales were reported up 0.6% and June sales were revised from down 0.2% to up 0.3%. False alarm, the consumer is out there spending.
  • On September 15, August retail sales were reported down 0.2% and July sales were revised from +0.6% to +0.3% and June was revised from up 0.3% to down 0.1%.

August data will surely be revised, up or down, but this is what we have at this point: Retail and Food Services Sales have totally stalled after January 2017 (+0.3% in the last 7 months, same ex-food). So far in Q3, sales are growing at a 0.6% annualized pace relative to the prior quarter (1.4%).

image

Retail control sales (excludes food, autos, building materials and gasoline and which is a direct input into GDP), declined 0.2% following a 0.6% gain in July. Control sales are running at a quarterly annualized pace of +1.3% compared to +3.9% in 2Q.

I have been writing on the very fragile state of the U.S. consumer throughout 2017 (recently in SEPTEMBER!), pointing out the widening divergence between income and expenditures and the resulting worrisome drop in the savings rate. Stated briefly, Americans have been overspending their income since early 2016, dissaving to the point where they now have little cushion to absorb any shock. Like Harvey and Irma if you live in the south, like a 14% spike in gas prices if you live anywhere in the USA.

From the September University of Michigan Survey of Consumers:

  • buying intentions for autos dropped from 152 last April to 136, the lowest reading in 3 years;
  • buying plans for homes went from 155 in April to 138 in September, lowest in 6 years;

This is happening right at the start of the most important period for the economy: back-to-school, Thanksgiving and Christmas. There’s an old saying in retail: “as back-to-school goes, so goes Christmas” …

Slow manufacturing of consumer goods reflect the absence of any momentum in new orders from merchants which reflect the absence of any momentum in consumer demand.

The chart below plots the YoY rate of growth in nominal retail sales and nominal GDP. Retail sales are still up 3.2% YoY but if they remain flat (seasonally adjusted) through December, like they have since January, the YoY growth rate will collapse to +0.8% at year end.

image

Merchants would find themselves overstocked and would further reduce their orders, killing consumer goods manufacturers in Q1’18.

This is how a U.S. recession could arrive without any direct contribution from the Fed.

But here’s how the Fed could contribute: rising debt + rising interest rates = problems:

(…) JPMorgan’s credit card delinquencies rose 1.16 percent in August from 1.15 percent in July, while Capital One reported a delinquency rate of 3.97 percent, up from 3.81 percent in July.

Discover Financial Services’ (DFS.N) monthly credit card delinquency rate rose to 2.1 percent in August versus 2 percent in July.

Overall, seasonally-adjusted credit card delinquency rates for U.S. banks rose to 2.47 percent in the second quarter from 2.20 percent a year earlier, according to New York Fed data. (…)

There has been a notable increase in the transition to serious delinquency levels primarily among borrowers with credit scores of below 660, the NY Fed said in a blogpost.

“It is not clear yet what effect it will have on the future. But historically it has been the case that once these delinquency rates start to rise, they can continue to rise,” Haughwout said. (…)

And banks halt lending, yaddi, yaddi, yadda…

Online sales can be blamed, but only to an extent. Overall demand is weak, even for toys:

(…) In addition to shrinking sales and heightened competition, Toys ‘R’ Us has been burdened with debt from a leveraged buyout 12 years ago. (…) A Toys ‘R’ Us restructuring would add to a list of more than 20 retailers, including RadioShack and Payless Shoe Source, that have filed for bankruptcy since the beginning of 2017. Another big box chain, Staples Inc., recently agreed to be taken private in a leveraged buyout. (…)

Some large toy brands, such as Lego and Star Wars, have also struggled recently, while the collectible Shopkins toys, which Toys ‘R’ Us helped launch, is on the downswing. Earlier this month, Lego AS reported its first decline in sales in 13 years and said it would cut 8% of its workforce. Another toy maker, Mattel Inc., replaced its chief executive earlier this year after a slide in holiday sales. (…)

Fingers crossed Hopefully, these won’t slip any further (from The Daily Shot):

  

The ECRI Weekly Leading Index has turned sharply lower, totally unnoticed by equities (chart from Ed Yardeni)

image

From the ECRI blog:

(…) Most believe recessions are caused by shocks that then propagate through the economy. In contrast, our research shows that endogenous cyclical forces periodically open up windows of vulnerability for the economy, and that, once it is cyclically vulnerable, almost any exogenous shock can easily tip it into recession. Because such shocks tend to arrive sooner or later, an economy’s entry into a susceptible state is almost always followed by recession. (…)

Needless to say, the debate on the Fed’s next moves will only intensify, within and without the Fed. The economy is clearly weak and could quickly get a lot weaker. Forthcoming eco data will be very noisy and the Fed is split on the real inflation trends. Unlike the bond market:

image

Sorry, You Are Probably Not Getting a Raise Next Year Businesses plan to keep budgets for raises relatively flat in 2018, while devoting more dollars to performance-based pay, a new survey says.
Eurozone Wage Growth Hits Two-Year High The pace of wage growth suggests inflation may be set to accelerate

(…) Eurostat said wages were 2.0% higher in the three months through June than a year earlier, the fastest rise since the first quarter of 2015 and up from 1.3% in the previous three-month period. (…)

Friday’s figures follow data released earlier this week that showed the number of people in work across the eurozone rose 0.4% during the second quarter, and at 155.6 million was the highest number ever recorded. With more people in work, and earning more, spending power is on the rise, a boost for the eurozone’s growth prospects. (…)

image

Economists Boost Euro-Area Outlook, See Best Year in a Decade
SENTIMENT WATCH

Related image

(…) More and more investors are piling into stocks that are rising rather than buying those that are falling:

image

(…) The question is whether this is a problem. Market breadth, which measures the number of stocks that are rising, can be a sign of market vitality or weakness. And volume is another way to look at market breadth. So receding volume flows into declining stocks could be a worry. But there are a number of reasons not to be concerned, at least not yet. First, market breadth overall has not been shrinking. Of the S&P 500, 355 are up through mid-September. That’s slightly more than the 332 that were up at this time last year and far more than the 191 that were up in the first eight and a half months of 2015.

(…) the rise of passive investing has most likely blurred all of these technical market indicators. (…)

  • Ned Davis Research shows that demand volume remains greater than supply volume (via cmgwealth.com) :

Smile The bull market has turned into the Seinfeld market. During every episode, investors are watching for something to happen. When nothing happens, especially nothing bad, investors are bemused and show their appreciation by throwing more money at the bull. (Ed Yardeni)

Selling Pressure not only dropped [last week], but reaffirmed its long-term downtrend by recording its lowest reading since the start of the bull market in 2009. Thus, the rising Supply historically associated with an approaching major market top is currently nowhere in evidence. At the same time, Demand is expanding on both a short and intermediate term basis. That is, Buying Power has resumed its long term expansion, while the Short Term Index (which measures the shorter term trend in Demand), has recently shown its most rapid expansion since the market rally from the Nov. 2016 low. Thus, this week’s new highs in the major price indexes have been confirmed by an ongoing contraction in Supply and expansion in Demand – a pattern that has historically provided investors with the best opportunities for new buying.
        

  • Nonetheless, overall volume keeps declining as Ed Yardeni shows:

image

BITCOIN
  • (Mohamed A. El-Erian)
M.B.A. Applications Decline for Third Year in a Row Applications to full-time M.B.A. programs in the U.S. fell for a third straight year, the latest signal that business schools are struggling to entice young professionals out of a strengthening job market.

THE DAILY EDGE (15 September 2017): Inflation Focus

Suddenly, everybody is focusing on inflation, not only because the Fed is fixated on it, but also because inflation’s impact on equity valuations is getting more widely recognized. Today’s WSJ carries this from James Mackintosh:

(…) [a] question looms large for investors: even if inflation has been conquered, does that justify high stock prices?

The question might seem dumb. Low inflation means low interest rates and so higher prices for equities. As projected future profits are worth more in today’s money, companies spend less to service their debts and shares become more attractive relative to low-yielding cash and bonds. What’s not to like?

History confirms the simple view, in that stock valuations have on average been much higher when inflation is below 4% than when it is above. Even better, the S&P 500 on average rose about 8% in the year following inflation coming in below 4%, against just 2% gains for faster inflation.

Unfortunately, averages conceal a lot, and in this case they hide the truth. The truth is that what matters most to stock prices isn’t where inflation stands, but where it will stand in future compared with what is currently priced in. Investors like low and stable inflation, but some of the best times to buy stocks have been when inflation is very high, and about to plummet, as in 1979. Equally, some of the worst times to buy stocks have been when inflation seems under control, but is about to take off, as for example at the end of 1936.

Even worse, the average hides massive variation. Data put together by Yale Prof Robert Shiller for the S&P and U.S. inflation back to 1871 show that investing when inflation was between 1% and 2%, as it currently is, offered a 1-year gain in the S&P averaging 8.6%—with dividends on top. Not bad, you might think as you dial your broker. But the range was huge, from a whopping rise of 41% to a loss of 35%—again depending on whether inflation subsequently rose or fell.

This might seem like ancient history, but in August 2007, considered by many to be the start of the financial crisis, inflation was below 2% and the stock market was booming.

Perhaps most relevant is late 1965. Inflation had been below 2% for seven years, stocks were on a roll and Beatlemania was at its height in America. Investors seemed to agree with John Lennon as he sang “I Feel Fine,” and stock valuations hit their highest since 1929 on the widely used Shiller P/E ratio, which smooths the cycle by comparing price to 10 years of earnings. It would be another 30 years before U.S. shares were again so highly valued. (…)

Mackintosh nails it when he writes “what matters most to stock prices isn’t where inflation stands, but where it will stand in future compared with what is currently priced in.”

This is the Rule of 20, without any forecasting: fair P/E is 20 minus inflation. As inflation fluctuates, so does “fair P/E”. Superimpose fluctuating investors psychology and you get varying discounts/premiums over “fair P/E” and you get

  • some of the best times to buy stocks when inflation is very high and falling or
  • some of the worst times to buy stocks when inflation seems under control and takes off.

In August 2007, inflation was indeed 2.0%, down from 4.7% in September 2005. The S&P 500 Index closed August at 1474, up 20% in 2 years. The trailing P/E was 16.4 and the Rule of 20 P/E was 18.3, both still in ok range. But CPI spiked in subsequent months reaching +3.5% YoY in October. The trailing P/E had reached 17.8 but the Rule of 20 P/E had spiked to 21.3 when the S&P 500 peaked on October 31 at 1575. Inflation peaked in January 2008 but earnings were then collapsing from their June 2007 peak.

Fluctuations in the Rule of 20 P/E (black line below) are pretty regular between 15 and 23, always providing an objective assessment of the valuation risk/reward ratio. (The yellow line on the chart plots the Rule of 20 fair value combining the Rule of 20 P/E with trailing earnings since earnings trends occasionally offset inflation trends.)

image

Mackintosh is right to mention the mention the mid-1960’s as the current period could turn out similarly with low and stable inflation requiring a hands off Fed while profits advanced regularly (look at the yellow line between 1961 and 1966). The S&P 500 peaked in January 1966 when the Rule of 20 P/E touched 20 (actual P/E 17.7), right when inflation troughed at 1.9% and profits stalled. The S&P 500 lost 17% in 9 months, bottoming out at the inflation high point of 3.8% in October 1966. It subsequently rose 26% in the following 12 months. The 100 basis points drop in inflation more than offset the 4% decline in profits.

The problem is that inflation reading is getting pretty difficult.

But the advance is debatable as shown yesterday. Now the Fed and the inflation hawks could continue to claim that recent lowflation is due to transitory factors, From The Daily Shot:

The core CPI would rise above 2% if one removes what the Fed considers to be “transitory” factors such as mobile service, medical care, vehicles, etc. This is a dicey approach because what’s viewed as a temporary effect can shift from sector to sector. Regularly removing these factors could introduce a measurement bias. Nonetheless, here it is.

Source: @jbjakobsen

But BloombergBriefs has another viewpoint:

If the inflation data reaccelerate over the next few months, a significant component of the pickup may merely reflect supply-chain disruptions resulting from hurricanes Harvey and Irma, thereby masking the persistent weakness. The risk is that policy makers will gain an unjustified sense of confidence in an inflation pickup and potentially proceed with rate normalization at a pace faster than they would otherwise deem appropriate.

For this reason, BI advocates using some type of filtering when evaluating the next several inflation reports. At the very least, analysts should strip out the components obviously distorted by the hurricanes, such as gasoline and motel/hotels; but more appropriately, they should pay closer attention to “trimmed-mean” metrics of inflation, which more robustly filter out distortions.

This pattern may provide some comfort to analysts that the deceleration is leveling out, but substantial contributions from categories such as non-school lodging away from home, which rose more than 5% in the month, suggested that hurricane impacts may have influenced the core as well. The unrounded core was 0.2485%, of which BI estimates that about five basis points was related to hotel/motel costs.

Here’s the Cleveland Fed’s wrap up on inflation trends:

image

The debate will surely intensify as recent transitory deflators meet with upcoming transitory reflators.

Meanwhile, in the background:

Central Banks Edge Away From Easy Money The Fed, ECB and BOE all appear to be on a similar path toward less accommodative monetary policy

And in the black ground:

North Korea Puts Guam in Range With Missile Launch Over Japan