The enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it’s the illusion of knowledge (Stephen Hawking)

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so (Mark Twain)

Invest with smart knowledge and objective odds

NEW$ & VIEW$ (21 MARCH 2016)

Widening Home-Price Gap Makes Trading Up Harder

(…) The analysis, by real-estate tracker Trulia, found that fewer midrange or trade-up homes came onto the market over the past four years in metro areas where prices of high-end homes shot up the most.

Midtier homeowners are less likely to try to sell if premium homes are out of reach. That reduces inventory of such homes, leading to sales stagnation and higher prices.

“People may be in a good spot to sell their homes, but if they can’t find another home to buy they’re going to be more likely to stay put,” said Ralph McLaughlin, chief economist at Trulia. “It’s really a gridlock, a traffic jam that’s playing out in the housing market.” (…)

Starter homes are defined as those in the bottom third of the distribution, with a median national price of $154,156, while trade-up homes have a median price of $267,845 and premium homes are priced at a median of $542,805. The median prices for each tier can vary widely across metro areas.

Among the top 100 metro areas across the country, the study found a high correlation between the lower inventory of midrange homes and the price gap between trade-up homes and premium homes. (…)

Across the U.S., Trulia found the inventory of starter homes has decreased the most—by 43.6%—over the last four years, followed by trade-up homes, at 41%, and premium homes at 33.4%. (…)

Q4 Household Debt Service Ratio Very Low

Student-Loan Delinquencies Decline The number of Americans at least a month behind on their student-loan payments is declining, reversing a trend the Obama administration has called a threat to the nation’s economic health.

About one in five Americans, 19.7%, who were out of school and required to be making payments on federal student loans, were at least 31 days behind as of Dec. 31, the Education Department said Thursday.

That figure, which covered only loans made directly by the government, the most common type of student loan, was down from a delinquency rate of 22.2% a year earlier. (…)

The growing labor market is a likely factor behind the drop, as more Americans with college and graduate degrees find jobs and their incomes slowly rise.

Another factor, however, is a surge in enrollment in so-called income-based repayment plans, which set borrowers’ monthly payments as 10% or 15% of their discretionary income, as defined by a formula. About 4.6 million borrowers with direct federal loans were enrolled in such plans as of Dec. 31, a 48% increase from two years earlier. (…)

Other reports show the typical balance of those behind on their student loans is relatively small. Borrowers in default owed a median $8,900, the Education Department reported last year.

Canadian retail sales rebound sharply, lifting growth outlook

(…) Economists on Friday were focused on Statistics Canada’s retail sales report, which showed a 2.1 per cent increase. That exceeded analysts’ expectations and recovered December’s similar decline. Excluding the auto sector, sales were up 1.2 per cent, while overall volumes gained 2.1 per cent. (…)

Consumers had cut back their spending in December in the midst of unseasonably warm weather but five sectors bounced back in January from lower end-of-year sales.

Motor vehicle and parts dealers’ sales jumped 4.8 per cent, the sector’s third gain in four months as sales at new car dealers rose.

Hopefully, these sharp gains won’t be revised down like the U.S. data.

Gavyn Davies: Will China’s new macro strategy pay off?

(…) The latest policy changes are confronting a deteriorating economic situation since the start of the year. The graph below, taken from Fulcrum’s nowcast models, encapsulates the key features of Chinese growth in the current decade:

The long run growth rate (mainly determined by the supply side of the economy) has slowed from 10 per cent at the start of the decade to only 6 per cent now. Not much can be done about that.

There is also clear evidence of a mini cycle around this trend that has an average duration (from peak to peak) of only about a year. The latest mini cycle seems to have lurched downwards in the past 3 months. The estimated activity growth rate today is around 4.7 per cent, which is lower than at previous troughs of the mini cycle, and the model’s confidence bands now extend downwards to 2 per cent, which would represent a true hard landing.

Yet the markets seem completely untroubled by this development, believing that it will prove temporary, and will be reversed by the latest stimulus from demand management. This optimistic expectation will probably prove accurate, though there will be some nervousness until the nowcast starts to rebound.

Macro policy faces a very difficult challenge. It needs to accelerate the rebalancing of the economy without proceeding so rapidly that a hard landing becomes likely. Ideally, such a strategy would have the following ingredients:

  • fairly rapid closure of moribund capacity in the manufacturing sector to reduce deflationary pressures;
  • easier monetary policy to assist domestic demand and cushion the property sector;
  • easier fiscal policy, directed mainly towards boosting consumption rather than investment;
  • a one-off adjustment (of about 10-15 per cent) in the exchange rate to restore confidence in the basket “peg”, thus ending destabilising capital outflows which undermine the necessary easing in domestic monetary conditions;
  • a comprehensive programme to recapitalise the banking sector as loan write offs are accelerated, mainly in the area of non performing loans to the state owned enterprises;
  • further reforms to broaden price signals in the financial and services sectors, and the labour market.

(…) As the SOE work-out takes place, the government has now clearly recognised the need to support the economy through easier monetary and fiscal policy if necessary.

On the monetary side, PBOC Governor Zhou said that the policy stance will remain on the looser edge of “prudent”, which is the central setting of the five main categories used by the central bank. The announcement of a 13 per cent target for M2 growth, and a new 13 per cent target for total social financing, suggest that the authorities have now accepted that they cannot bring down overall leverage in the economy at present. In fact, with nominal GDP likely to rise by only about 8-9 per cent this year, the debt/GDP ratio will continue to rise rapidly. No change in the “basket peg” for the exchange rate is likely, which might mean that further squalls will take place in the currency markets.

On the fiscal side, the new budgetary announcements suggest that the overall thrust of policy will be slightly expansionary, though independent fiscal watchers have reached different conclusions on how expansionary it will be in practice.

The table shows J.P. Morgan’s estimates of the various budget categories. The official budget (lines 1 plus 2) shows little change in the policy stance, but there is a consensus among fiscal watchers that quasi-fiscal easing (lines 5 to 7) will increase markedly if needed.

Although the Premier has emphasised that there will be tax reductions to support the household sector (which will make Ben Bernanke happy), it seems inevitable that the main source of fiscal support will come from infrastructure spending, as it has always done in the past. In fact, that is clearly shown in the fixed investment data released so far in 2016.

What is the overall verdict? In many ways, the strategy resembles the SOE work-out that occurred in the late 1990s and early 2000s (well summarised here). That involved many years of hard graft, but it did succeed in the end.

(…) “Lending as a share of GDP, especially corporate lending as a share of GDP, is too high,” Zhou said. He said a high leverage ratio is more prone to macroeconomic risk. (…)

Corporate debt alone now stands at 160 percent of China’s GDP, according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. The group’s secretary-general, Angel Gurria, said earlier in the day that sectors with especially high leverage include cement, steel, coal and flat glass, and China must address the issue. (…)

One option for addressing high leverage is to develop “robust capital markets,” Zhou said. The country should channel more savings into the capital markets, which will help reduce leverage in the corporate sector and boost equity financing, he said. (…)

Earlier in the day, Vice Premier Zhang Gaoli said the government would do what it must to avoid turmoil in stocks, the currency, bonds and property. He said the government should ensure that a plan for local governments to swap high-cost debt for cheaper municipal bonds proceeds.

“There will be no systemic risks — that’s our bottom line,” Zhang said.

Auto China Car Sales Suffer Biggest Crash On Record To Start 2016

2016 has started with a 44% collapse in China passenger car sales. This is thebiggest sequential crash and is 50% larger than any other plunge in history.

While there is a seasonal effect here obviously, the sheer scale of this 2-month drop – which removes the new year holiday affect – indicates something is terribly wrong in China.

Shifty Something is also terribly wrong at Zerohedge as the so-called Tyler Durden omitted to take account of the phenomenal growth in SUV sales in recent months. From the China Daily last week:

China’s auto sales fell slightly in February, though industry officials say the dip does not reflect a longstanding trend.

Last month, 1.58 million vehicles were sold, according to the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers. (…) Auto sales in the first two months this year totaled 4.09 million, a 4.4 percent growth from the same period last year, similar to last year’s overall growth rate. (…)

In February, China sold 478,000 SUVs, a 44 percent surge year-on-year, a continuation of the sales momentum seen last year. (…)

Sedan sales were another story. Almost 700,000 sedans were sold in February, a 17.8 percent slump year-on-year. (…)

Why the Global Oil Glut Might Not Fill Swimming Pools After All
M&A Bankers Saying No to More Junk Debt Banks are less willing to take on and sell the junk bonds and leveraged loans that heavily indebted acquirers use to pay for takeovers.

Credit Suisse Group AG, Jefferies Group LLC and Wells Fargo & Co. are among the firms turning down new requests for financing—typically from low-rated companies—as they retreat from the lucrative but risky business of backing debt-heavy buyouts, people familiar with the matter say.

Banks guarantee the funding in these deals, hoping to then offload all or most of it to bond and loan investors. They promise to provide the money themselves if they can’t find others to buy the debt. But as markets swooned in the months since the summer, investors have lost their appetite for the riskiest securities, making them harder to sell.

Some banks have unloaded the debt at discount prices, taking losses, while others are holding the loans in hopes of getting better prices later, which ties up bank capital and can hurt profitability. Banks were left with at least $1 billion in debt on their books over the past 12 months, according to banks and analysis by The Wall Street Journal.

With banks less willing to underwrite the most leveraged loans, the flow of new takeovers has slowed. U.S. mergers and acquisitions announced this year have fallen 21% from a year earlier to $229 billion, according to data from Dealogic. The pullback has made it hard for private-equity firms, which use a lot of debt in their takeovers, to get deals done. Those that are getting done, many are built to minimize junk debt, or debt rated below investment grade.​New junk-bond sales are down 70% this year. (…)

While junk bond prices have rebounded in a broad market rally, debt-financed M&A and new sales of high-yield debt have yet to pick up. (…)

SENTIMENT WATCH
U.S. Stocks Rise, S&P 500 Joins Dow Average to Erase 2016 Losses

And yet, as Bloomberg reports,

investors of virtually all types have sold more stock than they’ve purchased, according to Bank of America Corp. In the week ended March 11, the bank’s hedge fund, institutional and private clients sold $3.7 billion, the most since September and the seventh consecutive week of withdrawals, the company said in a note last week. Net sales by institutions were the second-biggest since the bank began recording the data.

True, small investors remain cautious:

image

image

But some people have been buying as this other Yardeni chart shows:

image

BofA might be having a market share problem. Members of the National Association of Active Investment Managers have been increasing equity exposure in recent weeks:

Transport Stocks Signal Markets on Track

(…) The Dow Jones Transportation Average entered bull-market territory on Thursday, rising 22% from its Jan. 20 low through Friday, and rallying to post nine consecutive weeks of gains. The Dow Jones Industrial Average has increased 12% since Jan. 20.

It is a sign of a new outlook from investors, who spent the early part of the year selling stocks tied most closely to the fate of the economy, sending the transportation index to a two-year low. At the same time, it is the latest example of a rapid and extreme shift in the market, which has made some investors skeptical about the potential for further gains.

Investors watch the index closely because it includes freight carriers such as Kansas City Southern and Union Pacific Corp., along with airlines and shippers such as FedEx Corp., that many consider bellwethers for economic growth. (…)

Part of the reason the stocks are in demand: Improving data on freight moving through ports, airlines, railroads and trucking companies are helping to calm investors’ growth worries. (…)

Some observers of the century-old Dow Theory, however, are waiting to see more. The theory holds that investors should buy if the Dow Jones Transportation Average and the Dow industrials both rise above previous highs. (…)

NEW$ & VIEW$ (18 MARCH 2016)

Philly Fed Surges

Following on a string of recent stronger than expected data in the manufacturing sector, today’s release of the Philadelphia Fed Manufacturing survey showed a surge for March.  While economists were forecasting the headline index to come in at a level of -1.5, the actual reading came in at +12.4.  That was the first positive reading since August, the highest reading since last February, the largest monthly increase since November 2014, and the strongest report relative to expectations since November 2014.  Concerns about weakness in the manufacturing sector that were so persistent in the beginning of the year are becoming more and more scarce by the day.

Philly Fed Chart 031716

Philly Fed Table 031716While the surge in the headline reading for the Philly Fed report was impressive, the internals were even more so.  The table to the right lists the m/m change for each category.  You may recall that last month, every component of the report besides the top line headline reading declined.  This month, nearly the opposite happened.  As shown in the table, every component increased this month, and some by a lot.  New Orders, for example, surged 21 points which is the largest monthly increase since October 2005!  Shipments haven’t seen such a large monthly increase since March 2014, and the last time every component of the Philly Fed report increased on a month to month basis was back in August 2009. (Bespoke Investment)

Haver Analytics relates the various Fed district surveys to the ISM:

The ISM-adjusted General Business Conditions Index constructed by Haver Analytics increased to 51.7 from 44.7. It also was the highest level since April and is comparable to the ISM Composite Index. During the last ten years, there has been a 71% correlation between the adjusted Philadelphia Fed Index and real GDP growth.

Doug Short averages out the last 3 months:

Meanwhile, the LEI has been flat for nearly a year…

Conference Board Leading Economic Index: Slight Increase in February

The Conference Board LEI for the U.S. edged up in February, driven mostly by large positive contributions from initial claims for unemployment insurance (inverted) and the yield spread. In the six-month period ending February 2016, the leading economic index increased by just 0.3 percent (about a 0.7 percent annual rate), much slower than the growth of 2.0 percent (about a 4.0 percent annual rate) during the previous six months. Despite a more modest pace of growth, the strengths among the leading indicators have remained slightly more widespread than the weaknesses. [Full notes in PDF]

Conference Board's LEI
Smoothed LEI

Hmmm…

Global Currencies Soar, Defying Central Bankers Efforts by many of the world’s central banks to weaken their currencies are failing, raising concerns about whether policy makers are losing the ability to wield control over financial markets.

Despite the Bank of Japan’s efforts to push down its currency and jump-start the economy with negative interest rates, the yen is up 8% this year and is at its strongest level against the dollar since October 2014. European central bankers are having similar problems containing the strength of the euro and other currencies. (…)

Even some central banks with less actively traded currencies are having a hard time guiding markets. Norway’s central bank on Thursday cut its main interest rate to a record low of 0.5%, and a bank governor said he wouldn’t rule out negative rates, in which central banks charge big lenders to hold deposits. The Norwegian krone gained more than 1% against the dollar and was up against the euro. (…)

“Central banks are experimenting in real time,” he said. “There is no lab for them to practice in.” Hot smile

Fewer Americans Got Hired or Quit Their Jobs in January The number of people hired into a new job or quitting an old job both declined in January, a sign that despite the overall 4.9% unemployment rate, the labor market has yet to regain its full vitality.

Five million people were hired in January, down from 5.4 million in December. The number of people quitting declined to 2.8 million from 3.1 million. The number laid off was little changed at 1.6 million. (…)

The decline in quitting in January represents a shift toward a less healthy mix of job separations. Among those who left a job in January, a smaller share did so voluntarily. (…)

And in a development that’s perplexed observers of the labor market, the number of job openings available at the end of the month continued to climb. Job openings are near their all-time peak, but for whatever reason, the pace of hiring is not following suit. Large numbers of jobs sit unfilled.

Auto U.S. Subprime Auto ABS Delinquencies Hit Highest Level Since 1996 Delinquencies on U.S. subprime auto ABS have eclipsed 2009 recessionary levels and are now at a level not seen in nearly two decades.

Subprime delinquencies of 60 days or more hit 5.16% for February reporting, marking the highest level observed since October 1996 (5.96%). During the most recent recession, delinquencies peaked at 5.04% in January 2009. February’s delinquencies are increased 11.63% year-over-year (YoY) and 3.63% month-over-month (MoM).

Subprime annualized net losses (ANL) have followed the rise in delinquencies, reaching 9.74% as of February, an increase of 34.10% YoY and 11.59% MoM from January reporting. Despite the increase, ANL remains below the recessionary peak of 13.14% experienced in February of 2009.

Sharp origination growth, increased competition and weaker underwriting standards over the past three years have all contributed to the weaker performance of the past year. Subprime ABS issuance averaged just over $20 billion in 2013 and 2014 before ballooning to over $25 billion in 2015, the highest level since 2005-2006. The number of lenders issuing ABS also increased to 19 in 2015 compared to the previous high of 14 in 2005 and 2006. Increased competition has led to increases in loan-to-value (LTV) ratios and extended term lending. Additionally, lenders have marginally weakened credit standards, with particular increases in originations to borrowers with no FICO scores. (…)

In contrast, performance within the prime sector remains stable, albeit slightly weaker. 60+ day delinquencies stood at 0.46% for February reporting, up 9.27% MoM but flat compared to the same period a year earlier. Prime ANL has increased slightly in 2016, reaching 0.69% for February, increased 32.17% YoY. While representing the highest level since February 2011 (0.90%), losses are still well below the historical average of 0.92% and the recessionary peak of 2.23% in January 2009. (…)

Fitch expects both prime and subprime auto loan ABS asset performance to improve over the spring months with the onset of tax refunds. That said, typical seasonal benefits are likely to be more muted this year versus recent years given rising pressures on the aforementioned asset performance as well as anticipated weakness in the wholesale market. Both the prime and subprime sectors have been buoyed by strong used vehicle values over the past five years, contributing to lower loss severity on defaults. However, with new vehicle sales and expected off-lease vehicle supply levels at historical highs entering 2016, Fitch anticipates weakness in the wholesale market, as reflected by the Manheim Used Vehicle Value Index (Manheim), which recently dipped 1.4% in February. Any future declines in the Manheim, as well as other market indicators, will likely contribute to higher loss severity for defaults and drive losses higher.

Despite further weakness anticipated, Fitch continues to have a stable outlook for prime and subprime auto ABS asset and ratings performance in 2016. ANL is expected to rise at or near the 1% and 10% area for prime and subprime, respectively, both well within peak recessionary levels.

Fitch’s indices track the performance of $99.5 billion of outstanding auto loan ABS transactions, of which 61.68% is prime and the remaining 38.32% is subprime ABS as of February 2016 reporting.

February 2016 Was Warmest Month Ever Measured Globally

Property prices soar in top China cities Price increases in top cities expand, smaller cities bottom out

(…) Prices of new residential buildings in Shenzhen rose 57 per cent from a year earlier, up from January’s increase of 52 per cent, data from the National Bureau of Statistics showed on Friday. Meanwhile, the northern city of Dandong in rust-belt Liaoning province saw prices drop 3.9 per cent.

Nationally, prices rose at an average annual 2.8 per cent, the biggest one-month rise since June 2014, according to FT calculations based on government data. There are signs that price gains are also feeding through to increased construction activity. Growth in property investment accelerated in the first two months of 2016, breaking a two-year run of slowing growth.

Governments in Beijing and Shanghai are now concerned about housing-market overheating and undersupply, while other cities still face an overhang of unsold houses built in expectations of gravity-defying property inflation. (…)

Overall, 32 of 70 cities in the government’s official price survey posted annual price gains in February, up from 25 cities in January. Analysts expect local governments in major cities to adopt measures to tamp demand, while a slow-motion recovery in smaller cities will continue. (…)

Highlighting the contrasting fortunes of China’s two-tier property market, the central bank last month cut the minimum downpayment requirement on mortgages outside of top cities from 25 to 20 per cent, in a bid to boost demand. (…)

Strategists Now See Virtually No Europe Stock Gains in 2016

Hit by one of the weakest earnings seasons in at least nine years, combined with waning faith in central banks, the Euro Stoxx 50 Index is expected to advance 1 percent for all of 2016. Only a few months ago, those same strategists were calling a 12 percent rally. The most dramatic about-face: Societe Generale SA, which cut its estimate from a 22 percent surge to a 0.5 percent decline. (…)

Two-thirds of the Euro Stoxx 50 members are still trading below their Dec. 31 level. (…)

At least 10 of 12 strategists surveyed by Bloomberg have lowered their 2016 forecast since December, cutting the average year-end projection for the Euro Stoxx 50 to 3,301 from 3,646. Back then, the most pessimistic call, that of Bankhaus Lampe KG, forecast a 6.2 percent gain. (…)

Analysts expect profits for Euro Stoxx 50 members to grow by only 1.5 percent this year, down from 5.1 percent in December. (…)

Money Hedge fund closures back to crisis highs Clients became risk averse in 2015 as big names suffered losses

(…) Last year was the worst year for liquidations since 2009, with 979 funds closing, up from 864 in 2014, according to data from Hedge Fund Research. The fourth quarter of 2015 also saw the fewest new hedge funds starting up since 2009, with just 183 openings compared with 269 in the third quarter. (…)

The HFRI Fund Weighted Composite index fell 0.9 per cent last year, HFR data show. (…)

So far, this year does not appear to be any kinder for the industry.

Between market losses and redemptions, assets in hedge funds fell by $64.7bn in January, bringing total money in the industry below $3tn for the first time since crossing that threshold in May 2014, according to data provider eVestment. Redemptions in January were the worst since January 2009.

In February — normally a big month for inflows — about $3bn of new money trickled in, compared with $18.6bn last year, eVestment data show. Investment losses dragged down total assets by almost another $20bn to $2.95tn. (…)

Herd mentality hurts hedge funds Markets are being whipsawed by the Fed, but it’s not working out for most hedgies

(…) Avoiding the crowd is difficult: iconoclasts miss the momentum on the way up and look bad by comparison, or they get caught in a short squeeze. But even those who play it safe may find the snapback painful when the mood turns. Last year, according to Novus research, returns dropped for hedge funds in “crowded” trades. That may be because the number of hedge funds hit a record last year — there are too many funds chasing too few ideas. Adding to the crowd are retail investment products, such as AlphaClone and Guru, that scrape hedge fund filings, mimic their investments, and now share their losses.

Trading in widely-held or widely-shorted names such as Facebook, Apple, and Netflix is already at the mercy of the view of hundreds of hedgies. Breaking away from them may lead to greener pastures.