The enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it’s the illusion of knowledge (Stephen Hawking)

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so (Mark Twain)

Invest with smart knowledge and objective odds

NEW$ & VIEW$ (17 FEB. 2015): China’s Challenges Grow; Earnings Stall.

Import Data Show Few Inflation Signs

Import prices fell 2.8% from December, the Labor Department said Friday, the biggest decrease more than six years, when the U.S. was still mired in recession. Prices were down 8% compared with a year earlier, the biggest 12-month drop since September 2009. (…)

Excluding petroleum, import prices declined 0.7% from the previous month, the largest decrease since March 2009, and are down 1.2% from a year earlier.

The price of imports from major trade partners, including Canada, the European Union, Mexico, Japan and China, all fell. Europe has been especially weak. For all of 2014, the eurozone’s economy expanded 0.9%. (…)

Export prices tumbled 2% from a month earlier, the biggest fall since October 2011. Industrial supplies, which include petroleum-related products, were the biggest drag. (…)

Meanwhile in China, while everybody devalues…

Maintaining a crawling peg to the USD, the RMB has appreciated significantly against major currencies since 2H14, leading to a spike in the RMB’s real effective exchange rate (REER). This has dealt a hard blow to China’s export sector. China’s exports to countries outside the US have been continuously weakening since 2H14, a situation that mirrors the weak export environment that occurred in 2012. (CEBM Research)

image

From Goldman Sachs via FT Alphaville:

The continued FX outflow in January indicated persistent weakness in demand for the CNY, despite a record trade surplus of about $60bn. FX outflow has totaled $37bn in December and January combined. The data suggest that the PBOC probably supported the currency by buying CNY in the market. The FX outflow also partly explains the slow M2 growth in January.

Similarly, according to another set of data released by SAFE yesterday, Chinese non-banks sold a net $16bn in CNY to banks in January through both spot and forward transactions.

As we have discussed recently (see EM Marco Daily: Interpreting China’s FX flows and position, February 11, 2015), we may continue to see FX outflows in the coming months, not only due to Chinese corporates unwinding their previous carry trade position; but also if Chinese residents continue to accumulate fresh foreign assets (including through hidden outflow channels) and/or foreigners continuing to reduce their offshore CNY balance.

China New Home Prices Fall

The average price of new homes in 70 Chinese cities fell at a slightly faster pace on month in January amid sluggish demand from home buyers despite officials’ moves to loosen mortgage rules and ease lending.

The decline in home prices also continued to widen in January on year, according to data issued by the National Bureau of Statistics Tuesday.

Home prices in first-tier cities fared better than prices in smaller cities, as looser mortgage rules and more accommodative monetary measures lure home buyers back to the market.(…)

Prices in January slipped 0.43% on month, compared with a 0.40% fall in December, according to calculations by The Wall Street Journal. The fall in January follows four consecutive months of modest month-on-month improvements.

The average price of new homes declined 5.1% in January on year, compared with a 4.3% fall in December.

Excluding public housing, private-sector home prices fell in 69 of the 70 cities in January from a year earlier, compared the 68 cities that posted declines in December. Home prices fell in 64 of the 70 cities last month on a monthly basis, down from December’s 66.

China Foreign Investment Rises China recorded strong inflows of foreign investment capital in January despite slower economic growth, as services and high-end manufacturing lured investor interest, government data showed.

China attracted $13.92 billion of foreign direct investment in January, up 29.4% from a year earlier, and above December’s $13.32 billion, the Ministry of Commerce said Monday. Foreign direct investments in China were up a modest 1.7% at $119.6 billion last year after a 5.3% rise in 2013.

Port Delays Starting to Damage Businesses As employers at the ports along the West Coast refused to unload ships for the sixth day out of the past 10, their nine-month contract dispute with port workers is becoming a significant business problem.

The delays are causing acute distress to small-business owners with limited inventory to cover sales. Retailers, who had been largely unscathed, are feeling the impact. Levi Strauss & Co. said it was concerned it wouldn’t receive some products in time for spring deliveries.

The port delays also are causing problems for auto makers. As of Monday, Honda MotorCo. was experiencing parts shortages at plants in Ohio, Indiana and Canada that will affect its production on multiple days over the next week.

Japan’s Growth Data Show Signal of Inflation for First Time in 17 Years

(…) For the first time since 1997, “nominal” growth in gross domestic product–growth before adjustment for prices–outpaced real growth.

Granted, much of the increase was caused by a rise in the national sales tax to 8% from 5% in April 2014. (Not coincidentally, 1997 was also a sales-tax increase year.) But many goods, including those that are exported, aren’t affected by the sales tax, and economists say some of the 2014 price rise reflects genuine underlying inflation. (…)

European Auto Sales Rise 6.2% With Economy Helping Renault, VW

Registrations rose 6.2 percent in January from a year earlier to 1.03 million vehicles, the European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association, or ACEA, said today. That compares with increases of 4.9 percent in December and 5.4 percent for all of 2014, the first year of growth after a six-year drop.

All five of Europe’s largest auto markets expanded last month, with increases of 28 percent in Spain, 11 percent in Italy, 6.7 percent in the U.K., 6.2 percent in France and 2.6 percent in Germany.

Putin Lets Consumers Feel Pain as Russian Slump Deepens

(…) For 2015, the Economy Ministry predicts a decline of more than 9 percent in real wages after a 1 percent drop in 2014. That compares with an average annual increase of more than 10 percent in monthly wages in the past 15 years. Disposable incomes will probably shrink more than 6 percent, with retail sales set to slide 8 percent, according to the ministry’s updated forecasts, released last month. (…)

Household consumption accounted for most or all expansion in gross domestic product between 2010 and 2013, according to a World Bank report published last year. It contributed 3.8 percentage points to GDP gains in 2012 and 2.3 percentage points the following year, when the broader economy gained 3.4 percent and 1.3 percent, respectively, the lender estimates. (…)

Russia will report consumption-related statistics this week. The annual drop in real wages accelerated to 6.1 percent last month, the biggest decline since 1999, according to the median estimate of 12 analysts in a Bloomberg survey. Retail sales probably fell 1.9 percent from January 2014, which would be the first negative reading since 2009, a separate poll showed. (…)

Oil rises to $62, near 2015 high as Mideast risks support
Libya Warns of Oil Shutdown as Attacks Escalate

Libya’s state-run oil company warned that it would shut production at all fields if authorities in the divided nation fail to contain an escalation of attacks on facilities that cut crude output to a year-low. (…)

The North African nation’s oil production was reduced by 180,000 barrels a day after a fire at a pipeline that carries crude to the eastern Hariga port, National Oil spokesman Mohamed Elharari said by phone in Tripoli. Hariga, near Tobruk, has oil left in storage for exports and the last ship to load there was the Greek-flagged Minerva Zoe, he said.

Libya, holder of Africa’s largest oil reserves, was producing 350,000 barrels a day in January, Elharari said at the time. The nation may be producing less than 200,000 barrels a day after the pipeline fire. The previous lowest daily average was in March 2014, at 150,000 barrels. A member of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, Libya was producing 1.6 million barrels a day before the 2011 rebellion that ended Muammar Qaddafi’s 42-year rule. (…)

The Number of U.S. Oil Rigs Continues to Tumble

Greek Talks Break Down Talks over how to keep Greece afloat broke down abruptly, demonstrating a wide gulf between Athens and its European creditors and heightening uncertainty over Greece’s future in the eurozone.
Ukraine Truce Fades in Fight for Town Fighting for Debaltseve has become the biggest challenge to the cease-fire that went into effect at midnight Saturday and was supposed to end months of conflict.
S&P 500 Closes At New High U.S. stocks rose Friday, with the Dow climbing above 18,000 for the first time in 2015 and the S&P 500 index closing at a record.
Stock Market Climbs to Record on New Leadership

Stocks are marching to a new beat in February.

Growth-sensitive sectors are leading this month after less risky, defensive stocks outperformed in January. Strong gains in materials, energy, consumer discretionary, techs and financials have lifted the S&P 500 5% in February, taking the index to its first record close of the year Friday.

These growth-oriented names are up mid- to high-single digits on the month after falling low- to mid-single digits last month. Financials, in particular, have staged a sharp rebound, rising more than 6% in February after tumbling 7% in January following disappointing earnings from the largest banks.

EARNINGS WATCH

Factset:

With 391 companies in the S&P 500 reporting actual results for Q4 to date, the percentage of companies reporting actual EPS above estimates (77%) is above the 5-year average, while the percentage of companies reporting actual sales above estimates (58%) is slightly below the 5-year average. In aggregate, companies are surpassing earnings estimates by 4.0%.

As a result of these upside earing surprises, the blended (combines actual results for companies that have reported and estimated results for companies yet to report) earnings growth rate for Q4 2014 is now 3.1%. This growth rate is above the estimate of 1.7% at the end of the fourth quarter (December 31).

If the Energy sector is excluded, the blended earnings growth rate for the S&P 500 would jump to 6.1% from 3.1%.

As a result of upside revenue surprises, the blended revenue growth rate for Q4 2014 is 1.7%, which is above the estimate of 1.1% at the end of the fourth quarter (December 31).

If the Energy sector is excluded, the blended revenue growth rate for the S&P 500 would jump to 4.4% from 1.7%.

For Q1 2015, 63 S&P 500 companies have issued negative EPS guidance and 11 have issued positive EPS guidance. The percentage of companies issuing negative EPS guidance for Q1 2015 is 85% (63 out of 74), which is above the 5-year average of 68%.

Looking at the first half of 2015, analysts are now projecting year-over-year declines in both earnings and revenues for both Q1 2015 and Q2 2015, compared to expectations for earnings and revenue growth for both quarters back on December 31. Most of these downward estimate revisions have occurred in the Energy sector. Despite the estimate reductions in the first half of 2015, analysts are looking for record-level EPS in the second half of 2015. Analysts also expect net profit margins to rise (based on per-share estimates) starting in Q2 2015.

image

Like many other aggregators, Factset considers pension charges as non-operating expenses which explains its 20.8% growth rate for Telecoms in Q4.

The “official” S&P considers pension charges as operating expenses. Its tally of Telecom companies shows a Q4 loss of $1.56 per share from a $5.58 profit in Q4’13. This reduces total S&P 500 companies EPS by 4% ($1.10/share) in Q4 which is now estimated at $26.78, down a big $1.01 from one week ago!

Actually, last week was not good for S&P company earnings. The estimate for Q4’14 EPS dropped a big 3.6%. Of the 69 companies that reported last week, 21 (30.4%) missed their estimate compared with only 17% of the 321 companies that had already reported. Big misses were in Consumer Discretionary and Staples, Financials, Telecoms and Utilities. As a result, S&P’s beat rate dropped to 69.7% at the end of last week from 72% the previous week and 74% in Q3’14.

Importantly, trailing 12-month EPS are now $113.04, down $1.00 (0.9%) from one week ago. Given estimated EPS for Q1 and Q2’15 ($26.88 and $29.20, down 1.6% and 0.5% YoY respectively), trailing EPS will decline another 0.5% to $112.46 after Q2’15.

Bulls are likely to dismiss the $1.10 per share Q4’14 pension charges, even more so given that many aggregators do, and that when interest rates rise like most investors expect, these charges will be reversed. I am no bear no bull and I expect that the market will look beyond these one-off operating charges.

The Rule of 20 P/E is again bumping against the “20 fair value” level. It has done the same several times since late 2009, in fact 4 times since December 2013, uncharacteristically refusing to traverse into the higher risk area like it traditionally has done in the past.

image

Guidance Spread Still Negative

So far this earnings season, the spread between the percentage of companies raising guidance minus lowering guidance is -9.2 percentage points.  As shown below, that’s the lowest reading seen since the two quarters that came right at the end of the financial crisis.  Pretty amazing that the only time this many companies have been this negative over the last 10 years was when the S&P was nearly 1,400 points lower than it is now. 

Using Factset data, guidance is indeed somewhat worse than usual with 85% of total pre-announcements negative compared with 82% at this time last year.

This is nuts. Enjoy your trip to the moon.

Rocket Internet, the German-listed ecommerce investment group, has opportunistically raised about €600m in fresh equity at €49 per share.

In case you had forgotten, the collection of investments in more than 140 loss making businesses is valued by the market at about €7.6bn.

The cash raise comes after Rocket raised €1.4bn from investors at the initial public offering in October, but it has already spent €1bn since floating in Frankfurt. (…)

We have a confession to make, however, we just don’t understand how Rocket can be worth multiples of the values of the stakes it holds. (…)

Rocket started 2013 with €416m of equity investments in associated companies, added €165m but sold €193m worth, to leave it with €370m, although the more recent interim results put the year end figure at €361m . Either way, it had declined to €351m as of the end of June. Yet when it listed it was worth more than €5bn.

It has since invested €1bn, and the market cap has risen by €2bn. Do we assume it doubles the value of all its investments, but what then about the pre-existing investments valued at more than ten times their, er, value?

With a lot of internet nonsense the assumptions might be heroically ambitious, but at least it is fairly clear what they might be — every resident of a major city in the Western world might eventually be an Uber customer, for instance. With Rocket, we don’t even know where to start.

The meaning of the Minsk agreement The devilish detail of this document is highly advantageous to the Russians, writes Niall Ferguson

Niall Ferguson

(…) The Minsk deal was not even a formal agreement, according to some involved; more a to-do list that might (but might not) produce a truce in eastern Ukraine. Although the German chancellor and the French, Russian and Ukrainian presidents were present, they signed nothing. The document was agreed by representatives of the “contact group”, comprising the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe, Ukraine and pro-Russia secessionist rebels fighting in the east. (…)

But read the small print. The original Minsk accords of September 2014 stated that Ukraine would regain full control of its national boundaries immediately — aside, of course, from the one around Crimea, annexed by Russia last year. But the new document delays the transfer of border control in Donbass until late 2015. Moreover, the separatists will gain control of 500 sq km of Ukrainian soil not included in the earlier agreement. Finally, all constitutional changes mandated by this week’s document must be approved by the separatists. (…)

For there is no clear reason why the Russians should be more in­clined to observe this one than the last. To see why, you need to appreciate what Mr Putin is trying to achieve. This is not further annexation of Ukrainian territory but the creation of a “frozen conflict” zone of semi-autonomous regions where the writ of Kiev does not run. (…)

By inviting the chancellor and French President François Hollande to Moscow and then meeting them again in Minsk, Mr Putin has exploited this division to the full. He has significantly reduced the risk of US arms being sent to Ukraine. He has also lent credibility to Mr Obama’s new doctrine of “strategic patience”, unveiled last week.

The reality is that this strategy (also known as “dithering”) has allowed both Syria and Iraq to descend into chaos. Eastern Ukraine is well on its way in the same direction. Sadly, enough people in the west will swallow the fairy story of the Peace of Minsk to enable the harsh realities on the ground, like the small print of the document, to be overlooked.

Bearnobull’s Weekender

FactSet StreetAccount Summary – US Weekly Recap: Dow +1.09%, S&P +2.02%, Nasdaq +3.15%, Russell 2000 +1.47%
CHARTS OF THE YEAR:

These two charts should make you seriously cogitate during this long weekend (in North America). I will post on their implications next week but here’s a hint:

Earnings growth = Revenues growth (sales volume growth X sales inflation) minus costs inflation

Click to View

High tech utopia vs. reality and the weekly roundup in tech and retail by Leah Grace
The View From NATO’s Russian Front The Army commander in Europe on Putin’s new way of war, Russia’s growing arsenal, and coping with U.S. military budget cuts.

‘I believe the Russians are mobilizing right now for a war that they think is going to happen in five or six years—not that they’re going to start a war in five or six years, but I think they are anticipating that things are going to happen, and that they will be in a war of some sort, of some scale, with somebody within the next five or six years.”

So says Lt. Gen. Frederick “Ben” Hodges, commander of U.S. Army Europe. (…)

“What’s happening in eastern Ukraine is very serious,” the 56-year-old West Point alumnus says. “When they fired into Mariupol that got my attention. Mariupol is an important place, city of 500,000 on the Black Sea. Russia has to resupply Crimea by sea or air, and that is very expensive, so obviously they would like to do it overland. Mariupol sits right in the way. They would really like to drive right through there.”

What Russian President Vladimir Putin “has done in Ukraine,” he says, “is a manifestation of a strategic view of the world. So when you look at the amount of equipment that has been provided, and the quality and sophistication of the equipment that has been provided to what I would call his proxies . . . they clearly have no intention of leaving there.”

The new weapons Mr. Putin has supplied to these proxies include “some of the latest air-defense systems,” says Gen. Hodges. “They also have brought in some of the latest, most-effective jamming, what we would call electronic-warfare, systems.” This level of assistance suggests Ukraine “is not a foray, not a demonstration. They are deploying capabilities way above and beyond anything that any militia or rebel organization could ever come up with.” (…)

The Russians have “got some forces in Transnistria,” he says of the state that broke away from Moldova in the 1990s. “They’ve got forces in Georgia. And I think they view China as their existential threat, so they’ve got a lot of capacity out there.” The Russian military is thus already somewhat stretched, and Moscow had to carve out from existing units the battalion task groups currently arrayed near eastern Ukraine. Yet “they are clearly on a path to develop, to increase, their capacity,” Gen. Hodges says. Add to this expansion that “they’ve got very good equipment, extremely good communications equipment, their [electronic-warfare] capability, T-80 tanks.” How long will it take for Russia to reach its desired military strength? “I think within another two or three years they will have that capacity,” he says.

Gen. Hodges notes that the Russians already have an advantage in the information battleground: “They’re not burdened with the responsibility to tell the truth. So they just hammer away, and whenever somebody in the West puts out a blog or a tweet, there’s an immediate counterattack by these trolls.”

Russia Today, the Kremlin’s foreign-language television service, is estimated to be within reach of 600 million viewers world-wide. Russia Today’s YouTube channel has received a billion views, making it one of the most-watched channels on the online-video platform.

Then there is the Kremlin’s sheer aggressiveness, not least on the nuclear front. The Pentagon last year announced that it is removing missiles from 50 of America’s underground silos, converting B-52 long-range bombers to conventional use and disabling 56 submarine-based nuclear-launch tubes—all well ahead of the 2018 New Start treaty deadline. Moscow, by contrast, has been simulating nuclear strikes on Western capitals as part of annual exercises. (…)

Fear of provoking Russia has been part of the recent debate over providing lethal aid to Kiev. As a member of the military, Gen Hodges won’t weigh in directly in the Washington policy debate. “What’s more important is this,” he says. “We have to have a strategy. Just military aid is not a strategy.” Western leaders should first determine what outcome they’d like to see emerge in the region, he says, and then apply a “whole-of-government” approach, including a military dimension, to achieve it. (…)

Many Americans and their representatives are tempted to regard Crimea as a distant geographical abstraction—and to say that it’s about time Europeans met their own defense needs instead of financing bloated welfare states.(…)

Yet the failure of many of European leaders to live up to their defense commitments “doesn’t change our interest,” Gen. Hodges says. “And the U.S. economic link to Europe, to the EU, dwarfs any other economic link in the world, anywhere in the Pacific, China, India, you name it. So if for no other reason it’s in our interest that Europe be stable, that people make money so they can buy U.S. products. . . . We provide capability assurance here by being present here.” (…)

Nor can the U.S. project national power world-wide, as it has since the end of World War II, with an overstretched Army. “There are 10 division headquarters in the Army,” he says. “Nine of them are committed right now. I’ve never seen that. I don’t think at the height of Iraq and Afghanistan you had nine out of 10 division headquarters committed against some requirement.” That leaves little in reserve if another conflict breaks out.

To a commander like Gen. Hodges, the strain on the Army caused by budget sequestration is palpable. “With the possibility of sequestration hanging over our head, the Army will have to go to 420,000” personnel, he says. “That’s about another 80,000 below where we are now. . . . The strength of the Army at the height of the buildup was about 560,000.”

What Gen. Hodges fears is a “hollow” Army, in which commanders will have to forego a capable and sufficiently large personnel, readiness or modernization to meet budget requirements. To serve its purpose, however, an Army needs a depth of resources at its disposal. (…)

Kissinger on Iran Has the U.S. already conceded a new era of nuclear proliferation?

One big question coming out of the Munich security conference this weekend is whether Iran and the U.S. can strike a nuclear deal before the next, and perhaps final, deadline in March. But the better question may be what happens if they succeed—what happens if they sign an accord close to the parameters of the talks as we now know them? The Obama Administration may be underwriting a new era of global nuclear proliferation.

That’s the question Henry Kissinger diplomatically raised in recent testimony to the Senate that deserves far more public attention. The former Secretary of State is the dean of American strategists who negotiated nuclear pacts with the Soviets in the 1970s. This gives his views on the Iran talks particular relevance as President Obama drives to an accord that he hopes will be the capstone of his second term.

On Jan. 29 Mr. Kissinger appeared before the Senate Armed Services Committee with two other former Secretaries of State, George Shultz and Madeleine Albright. Here’s how he described the talks in his prepared remarks:

“Nuclear talks with Iran began as an international effort, buttressed by six U.N. resolutions, to deny Iran the capability to develop a military nuclear option. They are now an essentially bilateral negotiation over the scope of that capability through an agreement that sets a hypothetical limit of one year on an assumed breakout. The impact of this approach will be to move from preventing proliferation to managing it.” (The italics are Mr. Kissinger’s.)

Mull that one over. Mr. Kissinger always speaks with care not to undermine a U.S. Administration, and the same is true here. But he is clearly worried about how far the U.S. has moved from its original negotiating position that Iran cannot enrich uranium or maintain thousands of centrifuges. And he is concerned that these concessions will lead the world to perceive that such a deal would put Iran on the cusp of being a nuclear power.

Administration leaks to the media have made clear that Secretary of State John Kerry ’s current negotiating position is that Iran should have a breakout period of no less than a year. But as Mr. Kissinger told the Senators in response to questions, that means verification and inspections become crucial. “In the space of one year, that will create huge inspection problems, but I’ll reserve my comment on that until I see the agreement,” Mr. Kissinger said.

“But I would also emphasize the issue of proliferation. Assuming one accepts the inspection as valid” and “takes account of the stockpile of nuclear material that already exists, the question then is what do the other countries in the region do? And if the other countries in the region conclude that America has approved the development of an enrichment capability within one year of a nuclear weapon, and if they then insist on building the same capability, we will live in a proliferated world in which everybody—even if that agreement is maintained—will be very close to the trigger point.”

Mr. Kissinger didn’t say it, but those other nations include Saudi Arabia, which can buy a bomb from Pakistan; Turkey, which won’t sit by and let Shiite Iran dominate the region; Egypt, which has long viewed itself as the leading Arab state; and perhaps one or more of the Gulf emirates, which may not trust the Saudis. That’s in addition to Israel, which is assumed to have had a bomb for many years without posing a regional threat.

This is a very different world than the one we have been living in since the dawn of the nuclear age. A world with multiple nuclear states, including some with revolutionary religious impulses or hegemonic ambitions, is a very dangerous place. A proliferated world would limit the credibility of U.S. deterrence on behalf of allies. It would also imperil U.S. forces and even the homeland via ballistic missiles that Iran is developing but are not part of the U.S.-Iran talks.

President Obama would claim the inspection regime is fail-safe, but Iran hid its weapons program from United Nations inspectors for years. That’s why the U.N. passed its many resolutions and the current talks began. Iran also hid its facility at Qum. All of this shows how difficult it is to maintain a credible inspection regime in a country determined to evade it. Or as Mr. Kissinger delicately put it, “Nobody can really fully trust the inspection system or at least some [countries] may not.”

Our own view is that Mr. Obama is so bent on an Iran deal that he will make almost any concession to get one. In any case Mr. Kissinger’s concerns underscore the need for Congressional scrutiny and a vote on any agreement with Iran.

From Russia with love?

From Jeffrey Saut’s Investment Strategy:

(…) Plainly, corruption is rampant in Russia with 110 people controlling 35% of the country’s wealth, while “50% of adults have household wealth of $871 or lower (WSJ).” Boy, talk about “The 1%!” No wonder Russian capital flight is epic. Moreover, in 2014 food prices surged 15.4% while crude oil prices plunged. Crude oil exports from Russia account for roughly 50% of Russia’s GDP, and the breakeven price for a barrel of oil to balance Russia’s budget is notionally $100. Further, Russian crude oil, for the most part, is priced in U.S. dollars, which is why much of Russia’s debt is also priced in U.S. dollars. Given the dollar’s strength vis-a-vis the ruble, that debt is becoming increasingly difficult to service. For example, if a Russian energy company borrowed $1 million dollars at the beginning of last year when $1 equaled ~33 rubles (33 million rubles), the size of that loan is now 67 million rubles since the exchange rate currently is $1 to ~67 rubles. Accordingly, our hypothetical Russian energy company’s debt has effectively doubled, while its revenues have been cut in half due to the crash in oil prices. (…)

WARNING “CHILDREN”!

During the AT&T Pebble Beach golf tournament yesterday, one AT&T officer tells the Golf Channel listeners that one of AT&T’s objective is to “tell our children of the dangers of texting while driving”.

Less than 100 miles to the North, some “children” are not listening as this WSJ piece sadly reveals. Note that these are tech executives…Crying face

image