The enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it’s the illusion of knowledge (Stephen Hawking)

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so (Mark Twain)

Invest with smart knowledge and objective odds

NEW$ & VIEW$ (4 SEPTEMBER 2014)

Today: Car sales hold, Capex revival, E.U. woes.

August Auto Sales Aim for Record

Overall, industry sales rose to an annualized 17.5 million pace, according to researcher Autodata Corp., the fastest since January 2006.

Small Firms Poised to Spend More on Plants, Equipment There are signs that small businesses are moving from slashing costs to spending more on new plants and equipment. Among small private firms, 51% said they planned to increase capital outlays in the next 12 months.

(…) Among 798 small private firms with less than $20 million in revenue, for instance, 51% said in August that they planned to increase their capital outlays in the next 12 months.

That is a record high, and it is also up from 42% a year ago, according to the survey by The Wall Street Journal and Vistage International, a San Diego executive-advisory group.

(…) Those who planned to increase capital outlays were owners and CEOs at firms in a range of industries, including service (17%), manufacturing (10%) and finance and insurance (nearly 5%). (…)

Small firms’ recent pattern of increasing their fixed expenditures is in sync with that of their larger compatriots.

Small publicly listed businesses, with annual sales of less than $25 million, increased their capital spending by 13% from a year earlier, to $8.06 billion for the 12 months ended June 30. In comparison, companies that are part of the S&P 500—an index comprised of some of the largest companies in the U.S. with average sales over $5 billion—increased their fixed investments by 16% in the second quarter, compared with a year earlier, according to a rate calculated by S&P Indices that is based on data from 450 of the 50 companies.

That outpaced the 4.6% growth in spending on share buybacks and the 13% rise in spending on dividend payments among S&P 500 companies. (…)

More evidence? First item in this post: NEW$ & VIEW$ (27 AUGUST 2014)

Fed Survey: Economic Outlook Brightened Economic activity largely picked up during the summer after hitting a soft patch at the start of the year, though the Federal Reserve’s latest survey of regional conditions showed few signs of pressure on wages.

While Wednesday’s report said more employers are voicing concerns about shortages of certain skilled workers, there were few signs of broad-based wage growth. (…)

“Businesses still mentioned difficulties in finding qualified workers, which seem to be both intensifying and broadening across skills and occupations,” the Atlanta Fed reported, pointing to shortages in trucking, engineering, construction and information-technology sectors. (…)

Several regions said that housing demand, which has lagged behind economists’ expectations this year, firmed up a bit during the late-summer period, though mortgage demand was still soft.

The report said that most districts had witnessed stronger consumer spending and tourist spending during the survey period. Auto dealers in Pennsylvania said that car sales had hit record highs in July before easing somewhat in August. Lending was up across nearly all districts, the report said, led by gains in San Francisco.

German Manufacturing Growth Robust in July

Manufacturing orders rose 4.6% on the month in July according to Germany’s economics ministry. June’s decline wasn’t as pronounced as originally estimated, with the decline revised to 2.7%, versus a 3.2% drop. (…) The strongest growth numbers were recorded in the volatile capital goods sector, leading some analysts to suggest that the foundation for renewed growth in German manufacturing remains unsteady. (…)

Orders from other euro-zone members increased just 1.7%, an indication that “downside risks for the German economy do currently not mainly come from geopolitical tensions but rather from longer-than-expected weak demand from eurozone peers,” said ING economist Carsten Brzeski.

Orders in capital goods, generally a volatile category, grew 8.5% on the month, with a particularly strong figure coming from orders from outside of the euro zone, which grew by 14.6%.

But the decline in domestic orders for both intermediate and consumer goods, two less volatile categories, and a foreign order decline in consumer goods are signs of still “underlying weakness,” said Berenberg economist Christian Schulz.

Markit’s August German PMI manufacturing survey revealed that

In line with the weaker trend for output, new orders rose at the slowest pace in the current 14-month period of continuous expansion. New export orders also increased at a lower rate, which some companies linked to the Russian sanctions. Increased demand from Asian markets meanwhile resulted in the overall rise in new export work.

imageFurthermore, Markit’s German Retail PMI today showed that

August data signalled a decline in German retail sales, ending a 15-month period of continuous growth. This was highlighted by the seasonally adjusted Germany Retail PMI – which measures month-on-month sales on a like-for-like basis – dropping below the neutral mark of 50.0. At 49.4, down from 52.1 in July however, the reading was indicative of only a marginal drop in sales. Surveyed companies partly linked the decline to increased competition, poor weather and a weakening economic environment.

Sales also fell on an annual basis in August, and for the first time in 2014 so far. The pace of contraction was the sharpest in nearly one-and-a-half years, with more than one third of the survey panel signalling a contraction.

E.U. RETAIL SALES WEAKEN

EU retail sales declined 0.4% in July, erasing more than half the 0.7% gains between March and June. Core sales declined 0.2% and are essentially flat (+0.1%) since March.

image

image

Pointing up The above was for July. Here’s a preview of August:

August Eurozone Retail PMI® figures from Markit pointed to a deepening downturn in consumer spending within the currency union. Retail sales decreased for the second month running and at the fastest rate since April 2013 as Germany posted its first, albeit marginal, reduction in trade for 16 months.

The headline Markit Eurozone Retail PMI – which tracks month-on-month changes in like-for-like retail sales – registered 45.8 in August, down from 47.6 in July and its third sub-50 reading in the past four months. Sales were also down sharply on an annual basis, the rate of decline likewise a 16-month record.

image

August saw decreases in retail sales in each of the big-three eurozone economies covered by the survey, the most marked of which was recorded in Italy. France meanwhile posted a solid contraction in trade that was its third in successive months and the fastest since May 2013. Germany’s retail sales also fell in August for the first time in 16 months, albeit only marginally. (…)

Retailers’ buying levels on the other hand followed patterns more consistent with the trends in sales, falling at a solid and accelerated pace that was the fastest in nine months. Furthermore, the decrease in purchasing activity was broad-based by country. (…)

Finally, August data showed a further sharp reduction in eurozone retailers’ gross margins, and one that was more marked than in the preceding survey period.

ECB cuts rates to record low Euro tumbles after central bank’s surprise decision
Euro Sinks to 14-Month Low

image

SENTIMENT WATCH

“The stock market is at an all-time, but economic activity is not at an all-time,” explains billionaire investor Sam Zell to CNBC this morning, adding that, “every company that’s missed has missed on the revenue side, which is a reflection that there’s a demand issue; and when you got a demand issue it’s hard to imagine the stock market at an all-time high.” Zell said he is being very cautious adding to stocks and cutting some positions because “I don’t remember any time in my career where there have been as many wildcards floating out there that have the potential to be very significant and alter people’s thinking.” Zell also discussed his view on Obama’s Fed encouraging disparity and on tax inversions, but concludes, rather ominously, “this is the first time I ever remember where having cash isn’t such a terrible thing.” Zell’s calls should not be shocking following George Soros. Stan Druckenmiller, and Carl Icahn’s warnings that there is trouble ahead. (…)

Geopolitics is on the lips of every investor.

Use of the term in Bloomberg News stories reached the highest last month since the height of the financial crisis in 2008. Bank of America Corp. analysts reckon 11 percent of the world’s population is now affected by conflicts; 86 percent of investors cited geopolitics as the top market risk, according to a survey by the Charlotte, North Carolina-based bank.

Less worried about the impact of Ukraine, Syria and Gaza on returns is Mouhammed Choukeir, who helps manage 5.7 billion pounds ($9.4 billion) as chief investment officer at Kleinwort Benson in London. He argues history is on his side.

“It’s easy to draw the conclusion that one’s asset positioning should be defensive during times of heightened conflict or stress,” Choukeir said in a report this week. “However, financial history teaches a different lesson: geopolitics rarely impact equity markets over the medium to long term.”

Of 16 geopolitical crises since 1950 that Choukeir reviewed, four left the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (SPX) lower a year after they began.

Take the Cuban missile crisis in October 1962. An investor in the S&P 500 would have been up 34 percent a year later.

Investing in the index at the start of the 1967 Six-Day War between Israel and its neighbors would have returned 13 percent in the next year; a wager in December 1979 when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan would have returned 30 percent in the subsequent 12 months. In the year after the U.S. went into Iraq in 2003, the S&P 500 added 35 percent.

That’s not to say conflicts are a buy signal. The Arab-Israeli war of 1973 triggered a 35 percent slump in the U.S. benchmark as an oil embargo spurred inflation. The Sept. 11, 2001, attacks saw investors lose 16 percent in the following year.

To Choukeir, the main reason to worry now is if the tensions spark a run of faster inflation. He sees that risk as low; the price of crude fell 5 percent this year.

“Geopolitical tensions are likely to continue dominating the headlines in the coming months,” he said. “While they will undoubtedly create jitters in markets in the short run, their impact on medium- and longer-term performance is likely to be minimal.”

CAPE IMPROVED?

Much, much has been written lately about CAPE and whether or not it can be useful. Back in 2009-10, bears were using it to demonstrate the folly of getting back into equities. Today, because CAPE remains in dangerously high territory, bulls are dismissing it or are trying to find ways to explain why it has not worked in the past 5 years to justify leaving it in the cupboard. The last times I wrote on CAPE were in Nov. 2012 (The Shiller P/E: Alas, A Useless Friend) and in Feb. 2014 (“LEAVING CAPE TOWN”).

Jeff, a reader, sent me a link to yet another attempt at modifying CAPE to render it more useful. Tom McClellan, a technical analyst who publishes The McClellan Market Report wrote an article about a modified CAPE which was reproduced by Pragmatic Capitalism under the title A Scary Valuation Indicator. I am not a CAPE fan for reasons amply detailed in my above mentioned posts but this latest attempt got me working: rarely have I seen people incorporate historical interest rates in their P/E analysis, even though it is inherently part of the P/E DNA. Could this latest version be the one that would provide CAPE with its missing ingredient?

Tom McClellan explains the relationship in layman’s terms:

This is because the P/E ratio is the inverse of the “earnings yield”, which should reasonably match up with bond yields.  If an investor can get a better return on his money in the bond market, then he will flee the stock market, or vice versa. That is what keeps the earnings yield and bond yields in correlation.  But when investors are bidding up stock prices to a ridiculous point such that the earnings yield is way out of whack from the bond interest yield, then there can be a big problem.

The idea is that by dividing the actual CAPE multiple by the Moody’s Baa bond yield, one would get a P/E ratio adjusted for credit risks as embedded in the Baa yield. McClellan makes no serious attempt at fundamentally justifying the relationship, other than to see that

(…) the result seems to set a much more uniform ceiling for how high valuations can go.

CAPE ratio adjusted by Baa yield

Not bad. A CAPE ratio divided by Baa yields at or above 5 has indeed identified most market peaks. It missed the 2008 peak but maybe the high bar should be set at 4.5 rather than 5.0.

The buy signals are not so obvious however, and the usefulness of the ratio between 1970 and 1995 left a lot to be desired.

What McClellan fails to see is that the real interest in this modification of CAPE is in the indirect incorporation of inflation in the equity valuation approach, something missing in virtually all valuation methods other than the Rule of 20.

Absolute P/E ratios are of little usefulness in assessing equity valuations as this chart reveals. Simply knowing that P/E ratios tend to fluctuate between 10 and 20 is an important but still often useless information. (Click on charts to enlarge)

image

Inflation is a crucial factor influencing earnings multiples. Saying P/E ratios are historically low or high without looking at inflation is like commenting on the weather looking through a window without knowing if it is cold or warm outside. Incomplete information may be hazardous to your physical or financial health.

image

The Rule of 20 P/E is simply the sum of the actual P/E on trailing earnings and the inflation rate. The next chart shows the much more stable (read useful) pattern compared with the actual P/E. The Rule of 20 P/E fluctuated between 15 and 25 with very few exceptions over the past 60 years. For investors, the Rule of 20 P/E provides a vital reading of how current equity markets really compare with their historical valuation range, using only actual data. Why nobody cares about this extraordinary relationship while desperately trying to make use of the CAPE P/E keeps eluding me.

image

Back to the Baa yields into CAPE. Below, I charted the modified CAPE with the Rule of 20 P/E (divided by 6 to have it on the same scale). The superiority of the Rule of 20 is obvious.

image

Looking at the current valuation readings, the Rule of 20 P/E is sitting at the “20” level, the border between lower and higher risk markets. The modified CAPE, like the original, is at extreme valuation levels, where it has been for the last 2 years. In addition to the original CAPE flaws, the modified version incorporates its own flaw: in effect, we can easily argue that the current interest rate structure is significantly impacted by the various interventions by the Fed and the ECB in recent years. As such, Baa yields are arbitrarily low at the present time and do not reflect credit risks and/or inflation premium in a manner consistent with history.

To conclude, here’s the Rule of 20 Barometer since 1956 (se also Understanding The Rule Of 20 Equity Valuation Barometer). You should also take a look at THREE-STARRED EQUITIES

image