The enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it’s the illusion of knowledge (Stephen Hawking)

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so (Mark Twain)

Invest with smart knowledge and objective odds

THE DAILY EDGE: 18 JULY 2022: Retail Sales Not “Solid”

SKINNING THE RETAIL SALES CAT

Axios Friday morning:

For all the talk about a recession, the consumer — the bedrock of the economy — appears to be holding strong.

Such is the great weirdness of the U.S. economy right now: Americans’ spending behavior, as spelled out in today’s solid retail sales report, screams, “No recession here!”

The retail sales data shows a broad advance in spending, rising 1% in June, more than the 0.8% analysts had expected. The figure reflects higher prices — but even excluding gas stations, sales were up 0.7%.

The new number is consistent with overall consumption spending continuing to rise in the second quarter, which would lower the odds of a second straight quarter of shrinking GDP.

Solid? Sales rose 1% MoM but CPI rose 1.3%. All of Q2: sales up 2.2% vs CPI up 2.5%.

The first 2 charts plot nominal sales with real sales deflated using total CPI per the St-Louis Fed. Real sales were down 0.3% MoM (-0.5% YoY) in June after -1.0% in May. For Q2, real sales are off 0.23% from Q1 and -0.4% YoY.

fredgraph - 2022-07-16T054741.706

fredgraph - 2022-07-16T054946.873

Most of the time, using total CPI to estimate real retail sales is close enough even though it tends to underestimate real sales given generally deflating prices of durable goods.

However, with the sharp rise in goods inflation in the past 18 months against more subdued services inflation, using total CPI substantially underestimates retail inflation. On a YoY basis, total CPI is up 9.0% in June but a weighted average of inflation in durable and nondurable goods is 13.7%       

fredgraph - 2022-07-16T062635.399

Using only goods inflation vs total inflation reduces real sales by almost 7% in June and shows a much weaker trend, particularly since March which jibes with what retailers have been saying.

fredgraph - 2022-07-16T063416.038

On a MoM basis, “adjusted” real sales (red bars) declined 1.4% in June after -1.7% in May. For all of Q2, “adjusted” real sales are down 1.5% (-6.1% annualized) after -0.2% in Q1

fredgraph - 2022-07-16T064235.630

A comparison of real retail sales using total CPI (blue), with my “adjusted” CPI (red) and official real expenditures on goods (black, June will be out in 2 weeks) supports my calculations showing that real retail sales are much weaker than generally believed.

fredgraph - 2022-07-16T065409.532

Early Read on Existing Home Sales in June

From housing economist Tom Lawler:

Based on publicly available local realtor/MLS reports released across the country through today, I project that existing home sales as estimated by the National Association of Realtors ran at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 5.12 million in June, down 5.4% from May’s preliminary pace and down 14.2% from last June’s seasonally adjusted pace. (…)

Mortgage origination for purchase are the weakest since 2013:

Source: Daily Shot

U.S. Industrial Production Unexpectedly Declines in June

Total industrial production fell 0.2% m/m (+4.2% y/y) in June after holding steady in May (+0.1% previously reported on June 28 & +0.2% initially) and rising 0.8% in April (+1.3% previously reported on June 28 & +1.4% initially), according to the Federal Reserve Board. The June IP index at 104.4 was 2.7% above its pre-COVID (February 2020) level. A 0.1% m/m increase had been expected in the Action Economics Forecast Survey.

In industry groups, manufacturing production fell 0.5% (+3.6% y/y) in June following a 0.5% May decrease and three consecutive monthly gains. Durable goods declined 0.3% (+5.4% y/y) after a 1.2% slide, led by drops of 1.6% (-1.0% y/y) in primary metals, 1.5% (+12.5% y/y) in motor vehicles & parts, and 1.1% (+5.4% y/y) in machinery. (…)

In market groups, consumer goods output fell 0.7% (+2.6% y/y) in June after a 0.7% May drop and four consecutive m/m increases. Construction supplies dipped 0.1% (+6.0% y/y) for both June and May. Business equipment, however, ticked up 0.1% (7.9% y/y) following a 0.5% May decline and three straight monthly advances. Materials production inched up 0.1% (3.6% y/y), the smallest of five successive m/m gains.

In special classifications, factory output of selected high-tech industries rebounded 0.2% (1.8% y/y) in June after drops of 1.4% in May and 1.9% in April. Manufacturing production excluding selected high-tech industries fell 0.6% (+3.6% y/y) after a 0.5% May drop and three consecutive monthly increases. Manufacturing production excluding both selected high-tech and motor vehicles & parts fell 0.5% (+3.0% y/y), the second straight m/m fall.

Capacity utilization declined to 80.0% in June, a three-month low, from 80.3% in May; still 0.4 percentage point above its long-run (1972–2021) average. An 80.6% rate had been expected. Manufacturing capacity utilization fell to 79.3%, the lowest since February, from 79.8%.

MAGA has yet to kick in. Manufacturing production is at its 2018 level:

fredgraph - 2022-07-16T072640.798

The Empire State Manufacturing Index of General Business Conditions recovered to positive territory in its July survey, reaching 11.1 from June’s -1.2 and -11.6 in May. The Action Economics Forecast Survey had expected a modest increase but still in negative territory at -0.6. The percentage of respondents reporting an increase in business conditions was 33.6%, up from 27.6% in June, while the percentage reporting a decrease was 22.6%, down from 28.8% in June.

The latest survey was conducted between July 5 and July 11. (…)

image

Among the survey components relating to current activity, shipments were up at a net of 25.3% of respondents, reflecting an increase in companies reporting an increase from 30.7% in June to 39.9% this month and a decrease in the number with a decline, from 26.7% in June to 14.6% this month.

New orders rose at a net of 6.2% of respondents, up marginally from 5.3% in June; there was a modest decrease in those experiencing larger new orders, at 33.7% in the July survey from 34.6% the month before and a decrease in those with a decline in new orders from 29.3% in June to 27.5% this month.

The unfilled orders index edged slightly lower to -5.2% from -4.3%. The share of companies with higher unfilled orders decreased to 18.3% from 22.2%, while the share with lower unfilled orders also decreased, edging down to 23.5% from 26.5%. With lower unfilled orders, it’s not surprising that the delivery times index declined on balance, from 14.5 in June to 8.7 in July. This is the lowest since February 2021. The inventories index decreased slightly to 14.8 from 17.1 in June.

The share of firms increasing the number of employees increased to 29.5% in July from 24.5% in June, while firms reducing the number of employees increased to 11.5% from 5.5%. These moves yield an employment index of 18.0, down modestly from 19.0 in June. The average workweek index eased to 4.3 this month from 6.4 in June.

Prices paid by firms and prices received by firms were still heavily tilted toward increases, but less so than in recent months. The prices paid index was 64.3 in July, down from 78.6 the prior month while the prices received index in July was 31.3 versus 43.6 in June.

Companies’ expectations for the next six months weakened noticeably in this July survey. The index of general business conditions fell below zero, reaching -6.2 after +14.0 in June. This is the first negative total since February 2009. Net negative responses marked all components except new orders, which were roundly at zero, and shipments, which were at 7.2, their lowest also since February 2009. Unfilled orders, delivery times and inventories all had net negative readings while other components moved negatively.

U.S. Import and Export Prices Continue to Post Double-Digit Year-on-Year Increases

Import prices rose 0.2% m/m (10.7% y/y) in June, following a 0.5% m/m (11.6% y/y) advance in May, downwardly revised from a 0.6% monthly rise. Export prices rose 0.7% m/m (18.2% y/y), after a strong 2.9% m/m (18.7% y/y) rise in May, revised down from 2.8% m/m. The monthly data are not seasonally adjusted. The Action Economics Forecast survey had expected rises of 0.7% in import prices and 0.9% in export prices in June.

(…) Import prices excluding fuels declined 0.5% m/m (+4.6% y/y), following a monthly decline of 0.3% (+5.9% y/y) in May. Import prices for foods, feeds and beverages declined 0.7% m/m (+8.7% y/y) in June after a 0.6% monthly decline (+11.5% y/y) in May. (…)

Import prices of automotive vehicles, parts and engines were unchanged over the month (3.0% y/y) in June after a rise of 0.4% m/m (3.2% y/y) the prior month, while import prices of consumer goods excluding automotives declined 0.3% m/m (+2.0% y/y) in June, following a decline of 0.2% (+2.6% y/y) in May.

The details of monthly export prices reveal a monthly rise of 1.7% (36.7% y/y) in industrial supplies and materials during Jung June, following a 5.9% m/m (37.0% y/y) in May, while capital goods export prices declined 0.1% m/m (+4.2% y/y), following a 0.3% monthly rise (4.8% y/y) in May. Automotive vehicles, parts and engines export prices were unchanged over the month (4.5% y/y), after a 0.3% m/m (4.6% y/y) rise in May. Consumer goods excluding automobiles export prices posted a 0.1% decline (+3.3% y/y) in June, after a 0.3% m/m drop (+4.3% y/y) in May. Foods, feeds and beverages export prices dropped 0.6% m/m (+13.4% y/y) in June after a monthly rise of 2.3% (15.9% y/y) in May. Export prices of agricultural commodities declined 0.3% m/m (+14.8% y/y) in June after a 2.2% m/m (16.7% y/y) rise in May, while nonagricultural commodities export prices rose 0.9% m/m (18.7% y/y) in June after a 3.0% m/m (19.0% y/y) rise in May.

GDPNow Q2 estimate now -1.5% vs -1.2% on July 8.

This Ned Davis chart says that we are, now, in recession:

As Fed Tightens, Economists Worry It Will Go Too Far Economists see nearly 50-50 recession probability in latest WSJ survey

Economists surveyed by The Wall Street Journal now put the chance of a recession sometime in the next 12 months at 49% in July, on average, up from 44% a month ago and just 18% in January.

Some 46% of economists said they expect the Fed to raise interest rates excessively and cause unnecessary economic weakness. Slightly fewer, 42%, said they anticipated the Fed increasing rates about the right amount to balance inflation and growth. Around 12.3% thought it would raise rates too little. (…)

Respondents cut their growth forecasts for 2022, projecting inflation-adjusted gross domestic product to rise 0.7% in the fourth quarter of this year from a year earlier. That’s down from 1.3% projected in June and 3.6% nine months ago. (…)

The survey was conducted before the June consumer-price index report, which might have altered the responses to some questions. The Wall Street Journal survey of 62 business, academic and financial forecasters was conducted July 8-12.

Canada Home Prices Slide Most Since at Least 2005 on Rates

The benchmark price of a home fell 1.9% in June versus the previous month, according to data released Friday by the Canadian Real Estate Association. That’s the third straight month of falling prices, and the biggest one-time drop in data going back to 2005. (…)

Sales fell 5.6% on a monthly basis in June.

Greater Toronto, the country’s largest city and the center of its financial industry, has seen benchmark prices fall 4.5% in three months to C$1.21 million (about $928,000). But the declines are steepest in the cities and towns around Toronto that gained the most during the Covid-19 pandemic as people used the freedom of remote work to move further away.

Oakville, a western suburb, has seen a 10% price drop in the last three months, while prices in the city of London, Ontario, about a two-hour drive away, have declined 13%. (…)

In Winnipeg, prices dropped 2.4% in June. They also fell in Vancouver and its outlying suburbs, Edmonton and Halifax.

In Montreal, prices fell 1.3%. (…)

Nationally, the June price decline was an acceleration from the 0.5% drop seen in May and a 1% fall in April.

It’s the first time since 2019 that national home prices have fallen for three consecutive months, though the soft patch is coming after a record-breaking two years for the Canadian housing market in which the benchmark price jumped 50%.

China’s Comeback Likely to Be Slow Economists expect a drawn-out rebound as weakness in the real-estate market, business confidence and exports drags on growth.
  • China Is in Trouble, Even With Sliver of Growth New threats to the beating heart of the economy—housing—and an increase in Covid-19 cases suggest dangerous shoals ahead.
  • China Covid Cases Climb in New Risk to Economic Activity
  • Goldman Sachs: “the strong sequential improvement may not continue in July given the temporary boosts in June (e.g., pent-up demand for auto and property sales after the end of lockdown) and the resurfacing local Covid outbreaks. The sector that we think is likely to continue to outperform is government-led infrastructure investment. (…) many of the problems in the property sector – some overleveraged private developers are cash-strapped and cannot finish project construction on time – remain unresolved. (…) the timing and path of an eventual exit from zero-Covid policy remain unclear, which continues to impose risks to growth in the face of the latest, even more transmissible Omicron variants. (…) This leads us to forecast 3.3% full-year GDP growth for China, significantly lower than the government’s “around 5.5%” target.”
  • China Weighs Mortgage Grace Period to Appease Angry Homebuyers 
  • China Seeks to Stem Mortgage Boycott With Developer Loans
EARNINGS WATCH
Earnings Season Off to Slow Start, Clouding the Outlook for Stocks Early reports put focus on threat of an economic slowdown, the pressure of rising costs on profits

Early reports from U.S. companies have refocused attention on some of the biggest challenges facing businesses, from the threat of an economic slowdown to the pressure that rising costs are putting on corporate profits. JPMorgan Chase JPM 4.58%▲ & Co., Delta Air Lines Inc. DAL 1.07%▲ and industrial supplier Fastenal Co. FAST 1.48%▲ are among those last week that warned they are facing strains or see clouds ahead. (…)

Two separate accounts of the 35 companies that have reported so far, with 2 distinct readings. Bank earnings are creating the confusion.

Factset:

60% have reported actual EPS above estimates, which is below the five-year average of 77%. In aggregate, companies are reporting earnings that are 2.0% above estimates, which is below the five-year average of 8.8%. (…)

The blended (combines actual results for companies that have reported and estimated results for companies that have yet to report) earnings growth rate for the second quarter is 4.2% today, compared to an earnings growth rate of 4.4% last week and an earnings growth rate of 4.0% at the end of the second quarter (June 30).

Negative earnings surprises reported by companies in the Financials sector and downward revisions to estimates for a company in the Industrials sector were substantial contributors to the decline in the earnings growth rate over the past week. Upward revisions to estimates for companies in the Energy sector have been the largest contributor to the overall increase in earnings for the index since the end of the second quarter (June 30). (…)

Looking ahead, analysts expect earnings growth of 10.1% for Q3 2022, and 9.2% for Q4 2022. For CY 2022, analysts are predicting earnings growth of 9.9%.

From Refinitiv:

80.0% reported earnings above analyst expectations and 17.1% reported earnings below analyst expectations. In a typical quarter (since 1994), 66% of companies beat estimates and 20% miss estimates. Over the past four quarters, 81% of companies beat the estimates and 16% missed estimates.

In aggregate, companies are reporting earnings that are 4.1% above estimates, which compares to a long-term (since 1994) average surprise factor of 4.1% and the average surprise factor over the prior four quarters of 9.5%.

Of these companies, 68.6% reported revenue above analyst expectations and 31.4% reported revenue below analyst expectations. In a typical quarter (since 2002), 62% of companies beat estimates and 38% miss estimates. Over the past four quarters, 78% of companies beat the estimates and 22% missed estimates.

In aggregate, companies are reporting revenues that are 1.2% above estimates, which compares to a long-term (since 2002) average surprise factor of 1.2% and the average surprise factor over the prior four quarters of 3.4%.

The estimated earnings growth rate for the S&P 500 for 22Q2 is 5.6%. If the energy sector is excluded, the growth rate declines to -3.4%.

The estimated revenue growth rate for the S&P 500 for 22Q2 is 10.8%. If the energy sector is excluded, the growth rate declines to 6.6%.

The estimated earnings growth rate for the S&P 500 for 22Q3 is 10.7% [down from 11.1% on July 1]. If the energy sector is excluded, the growth rate declines to 4.6%.

Downward revisions accelerating:

image

image

Across the board:image

Let’s see how far down that goes:

@LizYoungStrat

  • Variant Perception’s business cycle indicator is at worse levels than mid-cycle slowdowns of 2012, 2015 and 2018. Our indicator combines the best long-leading growth and liquidity inputs, and provides an extremely good lead on corporate earnings growth.

image

Trailing EPS are now $217.61. Full year 2022: $228.26e. 12m forward EPS: $239.98e. The “e” is very important here…

Stock Investors Have Rarely Been This Bearish Traders are betting on bigger losses for equities after a punishing stretch that has pushed the S&P 500 toward its worst start to a year in two decades.

True, but they have been more bearish at times:

image

  • TD Ameritrade Investor Movement Index: the June reading dropped to the lowest point since 2020, that’s a big round trip in investor sentiment right there…

Source:  TD Ameritrade Investor Movement Index

  • Retail Net flow vs SPX.

(JPM via The Market Ear)

This bear: not terribly deep and still short-lived

While there isn’t really a point to reiterating how painful YTD price action has been, Jefferies did think that it would be worthwhile to reiterate how it stacks up historically: not terribly deep and still short-lived. For example, while the current drawdown is deeper than the one we saw in ’18, it’s still several weeks shorter. Notably, for SPX bear markets that didn’t reach -25%, the average # of days until the next ATH was 568 trading days…far more than the current duration of 131 days. So despite extremely low sentiment readings, we are still churning around ‘no man’s land.’ (The Market Ear)

Goldman

Light bulb Stanley Druckenmiller at Sohn 2022

THE DAILY EDGE: 15 JULY 2022: Peakflation?

Advance Estimates of U.S. Retail and Food Services

Advance estimates of U.S. retail and food services sales for June 2022, adjusted for seasonal variation and holiday and trading-day differences, but not for price changes, were $680.6 billion, an increase of 1.0 percent (±0.5 percent) from the previous month, and 8.4 percent (±0.7 percent) above June 2021. Total sales for the April 2022 through June 2022 period were up 8.1 percent (±0.5 percent) from the same period a year ago. The April 2022 to May 2022 percent change was revised from down 0.3 percent (±0.5 percent) to down 0.1 percent (±0.3 percent).

Gasoline stations were up 49.1 percent (±1.6 percent) from June 2021, while food services and drinking places were up 13.4 percent (±3.9 percent) from last year.

Ex-autos & gas, sales rose 0.7% in June (6.6% YoY), below inflation.

More next Monday.

U.S. Initial Unemployment Claims Up Again

Initial claims for unemployment insurance filed in the week ended July 9 rose 9,000 to 244,000 (-37.6% y/y) from 235,000 the previous week, which was unrevised. The Action Economics Forecast Survey had expected a steady number of 235,000. The four-week moving average of initial claims rose to 235,750 from 232,500 in the prior week. The recent low for claims was 166,000 in the week of March 19.

This chart shows unemployment claims with the scale set to reflect levels between 2014 and 2019. The horizontal line is the average for that period. The low in claims was in March; they are up 38% since.

fredgraph - 2022-07-15T081710.935

PEAKFLATION WATCH

Moody’s adds a different angle to inflation analysis:

Supply-chain-constrained components of the CPI added 1.1 percentage points to year-over-year growth in the CPI in June, less than the 1.5-percentage point contribution in April and the smallest since March 2021. In fact, supply chain issues have been adding less and less to growth in the CPI recently. Reopening-sensitive components of the CPI added 0.3 percentage point to growth in the CPI in June, less than the 0.4-percentage point contribution in each of the prior four months.

image

Excluding energy, supply chains and reopening, year-over-year growth in the CPI in May would have been 4.1% compared with 3.7% in May.

Supply-chain effects could well disappear quickly as demand destruction helps alleviate supply constraints. Reopening effects seem to be already easing, normal as reopening gradually loses the “re”. If it can stay that way…

Moody’s economist Ryan Sweet says that “the typical American household now needs to spend $493 more per month to buy the same goods and services as it did last year”. This resonates much louder than simply saying inflation is 9.0%. For most Americans, $493 per month gone in smoke, monthly, is very significant. That’s $6k per year, equivalent to $8-10k per year in pretax income.

Some people compensate with savings, until there is no more, some borrow, at Fed-hiked cost, but most simply cut spending. Whatever method gets used, it destroys demand, now and later.

One of the big surprise in the June CPI was the 0.7% MoM increase in durable goods prices. Moody’s:

We knew that rental inflation was going to be an issue this year but assumed that was going to be more than offset by goods disinflation. However, the disinflation in goods prices has been more gradual than anticipated. This could be an issue for the Fed, as rents will continue to rise, making it difficult for the central bank to have clear evidence that inflation is decelerating and removing the potential for a pause in the tightening cycle.

fredgraph - 2022-07-14T180208.765

Durable goods account for 12.7% of total CPI, 16% of core CPI. Had the March-May trend persisted in June, core CPI would have increased 0.5% in June, not 0.7%.

New and used vehicles were again responsible for much of durables inflation. They together account for one third of durables’ weight in the CPI and they rose 0.7% and 1.6% MoM respectively in June. It is still a supply story since sales remain weak.

Manheim estimates that used retail sales were down 13% YoY in June and 11% from 2019. Manheim’s used vehicle prices were down 1.3% MoM in June compared with +1.6% in the CPI measure. Manheim says that it “saw larger declines over the last two weeks than the prior two weeks” so it is possible that the CPI survey was untimely.

Manheim’s used price index is down 6.9% from its December 2021 peak. Manheim also says that June “saw buyers with more bargaining power for this time of year”. Yet, the BLS measure was its highest last month and is up 2.8% from December.

I certainly don’t want to micro-analyse like many, and the Fed, did last year, looking at some specific trees and missing the whole inflation forest. But Moody’s calculations showing that, excluding energy, supply chains and reopening, headline CPI was +4.1% YoY in June is rather intriguing when put against the 9.1% jump in the total index.

Supply chains and reopening effects are admittedly transitory. Our focus should thus be on gasoline prices (92% of CPI-Energy commodities), up 59.9% YoY after another +11.2% MoM jump in June.

Gas prices peaked on June 15 and are since down 9.1%.

You might be surprised, like I was, to see how trends in gas prices are in pretty close sync with CPI-services (66% correlation since 2012):

fredgraph - 2022-07-15T065810.323

The fact is that energy prices impact every sphere of activity (e.g.: transportation, heating, a/c) are are an important cost element for service providers. So while energy prices are excluded from core CPI, they do impact services inflation through indirect transmission.

This next chart plots both series monthly and shows how services inflation have diverged in 2022.

fredgraph - 2022-07-15T071452.528

I see two possible explanations. One, wage increases have been so strong in services that providers had to boost prices well above what energy costs would have suggested. That does not verify so far: private wages and salaries are up 8.3% from their pre-pandemic level vs +8.1% for all private workers.

Two, reopening in services lagged the goods recovery and providers had to wait for demand to come back before raising prices. As a result, services prices have been in a catch up mode since March, transitory (!!) if you will…

Time will tell but there is a possibility (not a forecast!) that inflation could surprise us in coming months, particularly if oil prices retreat some more.

image

(Trading Economics)

U.S. Producer Price Inflation Accelerates to 11.3% Y/Y in June

The Producer Price Index for Final Demand rose 1.1% m/m in June after rises of 0.9 in May (+0.8% initially) and 0.4% in April, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The June rise was the 19th straight m/m gain and the largest since March’s 1.6%. The year-over-year rate accelerated to 11.3% in June, the highest since March, from 10.9% in May. A 0.8% m/m rise had been expected in the Action Economics Forecast Survey. The June PPI rise was in line with the June CPI released yesterday (1.3% m/m; 9.1% y/y), supporting the view that U.S. inflation from both producer and consumer sides is intensifying.

Producer prices less food, energy & trade services increased 0.3% (6.4% y/y) in June after a 0.4% gain in May (+0.5% initially). The PPI less food & energy rose 0.4% (8.2% y/y) after rising 0.6% (+0.5% initially). A 0.5% m/m increase had been expected for the core PPI.

The June PPI rise was led by a 10.0% jump in energy prices, the six successive monthly rise to a record high, following a 1.4% December drop; the y/y rate accelerated to a record 54.4% from May’s 44.9%. Gasoline prices surged 18.5% (86.7% y/y) in June, the biggest m/m gain since December 2020, after an 8.6% rebound in May. Natural gas prices jumped 6.6% (33.9% y/y), the largest of 20 consecutive m/m rises. Home heating oil prices, however, fell 1.7% (+100.8% y/y), the first m/m fall since November, after a 3.5% gain.

Food prices ticked up 0.1% (12.7% y/y) in June, the sixth consecutive m/m increase, after a 0.5% rise in May (0.0% initially). Food prices for exports rose 1.0% (14.4% y/y) and government purchased food prices rose 0.2% (9.1% y/y), but finished consumer food prices slipped 0.1% (+12.7% y/y) following five successive m/m increases.

The PPI for goods less food & energy grew 0.5% (9.1% y/y) in June after a 0.6% increase in May, continuing its string of increases since June 2020. Prices for final demand finished goods less food & energy rose 0.7% (8.8% y/y) on top of a 0.8% rise. Finished consumer goods prices less food & energy increased 0.6% (8.4% y/y) after a 0.8% gain, with durable consumer goods prices up 0.5% (8.4% y/y) and core nondurable consumer goods prices up 0.7% (8.3% y/y). (…)

Services prices increased 0.4% (7.7% y/y) in June after a 0.6% May gain and a 0.1% April downtick, registering the 17th m/m rise in 18 months. Trade services prices rose 0.8% (14.8% y/y) in June, the eighth m/m gain in nine months, after a 1.0% rebound in May. Services prices less trade, transportation & warehousing inched up 0.1% (2.7% y/y) after a 0.1% uptick.

Construction product prices rose 0.5% in June (19.2% y/y) after a 0.3% May increase, continuing their string of increases since January 2021. Construction product prices for government grew 0.5% (15.9% y/y), the 17th m/m gain in 18 months. Construction product prices for private capital investment rose 0.6% (21.0% y/y), having been rising since January 2021.

Intermediate goods prices advanced 2.3% (22.2% y/y) in June, the sixth straight m/m rise, after a 2.1% increase in May, led by a 9.9% gain (60.1% y/y) in processed fuel costs.

image

Demand destruction:

Canadian Factory Sales Fall for First Time in Eight Months

Factory receipts dropped 2% in May, Statistics Canada reported Thursday in Ottawa. That’s in line with economists’ expectations for a decline of 2.4%.

Sales fell in 11 of 21 industries, with motor vehicle, primary metal and miscellaneous manufacturing industries leading the decrease, the statistics agency said. Stripping away prices, factory sales fell 3.9% in volume terms.

Total inventory levels rose 1.6% on the month to a fresh record high, while the inventory-to-sales ratio increased to 1.59 in May, from 1.54 in April.

China Posts Slowest Economic Growth in Two Years The Chinese economy narrowly avoided a contraction in the second quarter as Beijing’s zero-Covid approach took a toll.

Gross domestic product expanded at a 0.4% annual rate in the April to June period, China’s National Bureau of Statistics said Friday. That was the worst performance since the first quarter of 2020, when the pandemic first erupted and the economy shrank 6.9% after the Central Chinese metropolis of Wuhan became the first city in the world to lock down to stem the spread of Covid-19. Economists polled by The Wall Street Journal had forecast China’s economy to grow 0.9%. (…)

Four regions affected by city-level mobility restrictions reported outright contractions compared with the previous year. Output in Shanghai and Jilin tumbled 13.7% and 4.5% respectively. Beijing and Jiangsu, a prosperous industrial province neighboring Shanghai that relies on the city for much of its logistics and finance, also recorded year-over-year dips in economic activity. The two had placed parts of their region under some stay-at-home orders when coronavirus cases appeared.

On a quarter-to-quarter basis, China’s economy shrank 2.6%, data showed, marking only the second such contraction since comparable records began in 2010. (…)

Unemployment in urban China eased in June, data Friday showed, to 5.5%, from 5.9% previously. Youth unemployment hit a new high in June, with almost one in five workers aged 16 to 24 out of work. (…)

Data released on Friday showed retail sales rose an annual 3.1% in June, bouncing back from a 6.7% fall the previous month. Industrial production also recovered after lockdowns eased, rising an annual 3.9% in June after a 0.7% expansion in May. (…)

Fixed-asset investment rose 6.1% on year in the first half of the year, data showed, down slightly from a 6.2% increase in the January-May period. (…)

Homeowners’ Revolt in China Jolts Market

This week, a movement among frustrated homeowners who have threatened to stop paying their mortgages on unfinished homes quickly gathered steam on Chinese social media. People all over the country declared that they would do the same if developers don’t fulfill promises to deliver apartments that were earlier presold. (…)

The shares and U.S. dollar bonds of many developers also dropped, sending their debt securities to deeply distressed levels. Some investors described a wave of indiscriminate selling that has dragged down the bonds of even financially stronger Chinese companies with investment-grade credit ratings. (…)

Aggregate new home sales at the country’s 100 largest developers have fallen every month on a year-on-year basis since last July, and the declines accelerated in the first half of this year, according to China Real Estate Information Corp., an industry data provider. Home prices have also been falling, and private indicators of housing prices have been showing far bigger drops than China’s official data. (…)

Earlier this week, a list of around 30 property projects in which homeowners have said they would stop paying their mortgages appeared on Chinese social media and was picked up by several research firms. By Thursday, it had grown to more than 200 projects, including unfinished buildings by multiple developers, including Kaisa Group and China Aoyuan, which have defaulted on their dollar debt. (…)

On Thursday, more concerned citizens took to social media to express their worries about the deteriorating housing market. Online petitions among homeowners of unfinished property developments in Wuhan, Shanghai and other cities gathered hundreds of signatories who said they would stop paying their mortgages if construction didn’t resume, or if their homes weren’t delivered on developers’ promised schedules. (…)

Fingers crossed Liu Jing, a sales manager with Shenzhen Worldunion Group’s Shanghai office, said that the lockdowns made some people realize the importance of owning a home. (…) “If there was another lockdown, I could relax in my garden and have some fresh air. I could feel a bit better,” Ms. Shen added. “I could also grow our own vegetables.”

Maybe lockdowns will save China’s housing market, at least give time to heal the deep wounds…

  • The National Bureau of Statistics’ 70-city housing price data suggest the weighted average property price in the primary market continued to decline sequentially in June after seasonal adjustments, driven mainly by house price declines in lower-tier cities. The proportion of 70 cities that experienced sequentially higher property prices rose in both the primary market and secondary market in June from May, but remained below 50%. (Goldman Sachs)

Chinese seem to have found a way to safely protest…

Italian debt market flashes warning as Draghi government teeters
Celsius Owes Users More Than $4.7 Billion Celsius Network LLC has a roughly $1.2 billion hole in its balance sheet, with the majority of its liabilities owed to the cryptocurrency lender’s users, according to a Thursday filing by Chief Executive Alex Mashinsky.

(…) The company pitched itself as a safe alternative to traditional banks and promised users high interest rates. It was valued at about $3 billion after raising $690 million in a Series B financing round in May, according to the bankruptcy filing. (…)

(…) In May, a pair of linked cryptocurrencies, Luna and TerraUSD, collapsed, wiping out $40 billion in value.