The enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it’s the illusion of knowledge (Stephen Hawking)

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so (Mark Twain)

Invest with smart knowledge and objective odds

THE DAILY EDGE: 23 MAY 2022: Getting Sentimental?

SENTIMENT WATCH
Late Rally Lifts Stocks After S&P 500 Skims Bear Market

We just keep making history! Up and down.

(…) At one point, the S&P 500 slid so far it was on track to close at least 20% below its January peak—what would have been considered a bear market. A comeback in the final hour of the trading day pushed the index higher (…)

It has been decades since stocks have fallen for such a prolonged period. The Dow industrials notched their eighth straight weekly loss, their longest such streak since 1932, near the height of the Great Depression. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq had their seventh straight weekly loss, their longest such streak since 2001, after the dot-com bubble burst. (…)

This week, the pain spread well beyond the technology sector, alarming many investors. Major retailers reported their profits being hurt by rising costs and supply-chain disruptions, driving a selloff that led to Target and Walmart’s worst one-day decline since the Black Monday crash of 1987. As investors took stock of how inflationary pressures and slowing growth could weigh on corporate profits in the coming months, shares of everything from banks to real-estate investment trusts to grocery store chains fell, too. (…)

On Friday, even shares of energy companies, which have benefited from surging oil prices, fell alongside the broader market. (…)

Until the Fed convinces investors it can tighten monetary policy and reel in inflation without triggering a downturn, it is unlikely markets will stabilize, analysts said. The central bank’s job will be made more difficult by factors outside of its control that have added to inflationary pressures this year, including China’s zero-Covid policy and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. (…)

The yield on the benchmark 10-year U.S. Treasury note fell to 2.785% Friday from 2.854% on Thursday. [And 3.12% on May 6] (…)

Bloomberg:

For the record: the S&P 500 fell all the way to 3,810 during Friday’s session, or roughly 20.6% below its record close of Jan. 3, then rebounded to cut the loss to 18.7%. The levels could be dismissed as trivial except for a nagging fact: history holds an improbably large number of examples of such rebounds lasting. In 1998, 2011 and 2018, the benchmark slid either below the 20% level or very near it on an intraday basis — only to reverse itself and never test the bear-market waters again.

Another fact to recall from those near-death experiences of the past: how bullish they ended up being. Consider the 19.4% drop from April 29 to Oct. 3, in 2011, for instance. At that bottom, the gauge experienced three days of gains greater than 1.5% — and continued on to its best month in 20 years. The recovery paved the way for the longest bull market ever recorded, the one that ended in the Covid crash.

Something similar happened in 1998, when the benchmark suffered a drop greater than 19%, bottoming on Oct. 8, before a 2.6% rally spared it from oblivion. From October’s start to the end of January the following year, the gauge surged nearly 25%.

In 2018, the bull market got within points of a 20% plunge on Dec. 24 before turning on a dime right after Christmas. Six days later began a year in which the S&P 500 surged 29% and the Nasdaq 100 rose 38%.

Julian Emanuel, chief equity and quantitative strategist at Evercore ISI, says 2018, 2011 and 1998 have been on his mind. “These three episodes notably occurred around periods of Fed tightening and did not accompany US recession,” he wrote in a note. His firm doesn’t predict a recession to happen this time, either.

And John Stoltzfus at Oppenheimer is reported saying:

I’ve been doing this for 39 years, and my gut is telling me right now this looks a lot like early 2009, before things straightened out. It looks like 1994. It looks like the fourth quarter of 2018. These things, if you projected negatively on that point, you missed the rally that followed after things were basically right-sized.

And today, the WSJ’s James Mackintosh also points out that “In the past 40 years, the S&P 500 has bottomed out with a 20%-or-so peak-to-trough decline four times, in 1990, 1998, 2011 and 2018.”

What the above commentators do not mention is that at the 1990, 1994, 2009, 2011, 2018 and 2020 bottoms, valuations were also at their lows, quite unlike presently:

                            P/E     R20 P/E    FOMC at low

  • 1990:     13.0       18.4           easing
  • 1994:     15.7       18.6        tightening
  • 2009:     12.7       14.5      done easing
  • 2011:     12.3       14.3             QE
  • 2018:     14.6       16.8  stopped tightening
  • 2020:     13.9       16.2          easing
  • now:       18.1       24.0      tightening 

James Mackintosh adds that

The common factor in the 20% drops was the Federal Reserve. Each time, the market bottomed out when the central bank eased monetary policy, with the stock market’s fall perhaps helping push the Fed to take the threats more seriously then it otherwise might.

That was exact in 1990 and 2020. But in other instances, the Fed was either tightening (1994), was done easing (2009 and 2011) or signaled it would stop tightening (Powell Pivot, Jan. 4, 2019). So far, Mr. Powell’s only apparent pivot is toward a Paul Volcker incarnation.

As to 1998, the Greenspan Fed decided to ease amid a strong economy, a 4.5% unemployment rate and stable 2-2.5% inflation, launching the second leg of the dot.com froth that Alan Greenspan himself labeled “irrational exuberance” in December 1996. But if you faded that rebound at 22+ P/Es, you could buy again 4 years later 15% cheaper.

I have been doing this for 50 years and I have learned that my gut is not always dependable. Objective risk/reward measurement has proven more rewarding, and less stressful.

I am often told that forward earnings would be more appropriate for P/E multiple calculation. I would only say that the Rule of 20 discipline is working very well with actual trailing earnings and also warn that, of the last 14 bear episodes, only 3 (21%) did not the precede a recession during the next year. These generally come with 10-15% earnings contractions, sometimes much more…

Quincy Krosby, chief equity strategist at LPL Financial, is totally right: “There’s zero certainty on where the economy is heading. You have a ‘recession’ camp, a ‘soft landing camp,’ and everything in between.”

But the world’s biggest hedge fund seems solidly camped:

(…) Jensen, who serves as co-CIO with Bridgewater founder Ray Dalio and Bob Prince, also warns that investors also shouldn’t expect the central bank to step in to save them. Instead the Fed will be hamstrung by its need to tighten financial conditions in order to bring inflation under control. This idea that the Federal Reserve is not afraid of a stock market selloff — and in fact may actually welcome one — has been expressed by the likes of former NY Fed President Bill Dudley in a Bloomberg Opinion piece from April.

“They want the asset prices to fall to a certain degree. And even if they fall more than they want them to, they’re weighing the inflation picture against that. So all of a sudden you’ve got a much bigger dip possibility before you get relief from policy makers,” Jensen said. “And in fact, the dip has to become disinflationary in order to do that.”

Jensen estimates that roughly 40% of the US equity market “can only survive essentially with new buyers entering the market because they’re not cashflow generating themselves. And that’s near a historic high, that’s like basically right in line with ‘99, 2000.” (…)

“The assets that need liquidity the most, that don’t themselves have cash flows are getting killed because liquidity is being withdrawn from the aggregate system and those assets that require kind of Ponzi-like ongoing purchases to support the assets, are getting hit the hardest,” he said.

That said,

  • bearish sentiment is getting near its extreme highs as Ed Yardeni illustrates with Investors Intelligence data:

image

  • volatility, a measure of fear, is also near extremes (via Ed Yardeni):

image

  • this contrarian indicator is in buy low range…although it can get worse:

  

  • deleveraging is well underway:

image

But we haven’t got the final capitulation yet:

“Watching”, but not selling out yet.

EARNINGS WATCH

Analysts must have been shaken by last week shocking revelation that inflation is hurting demand and boosting costs. The string of upside revisions has broken last week.

image

image

But it is a slow process among disbelievers. Q2 estimates are for EPS to rise 5.4%, down from 5.7% last week but Q3 and Q4 estimates are unchanged at 10.8% and 10.7% respectively.

Corporate guidance remains cautious but given that April seems to have been a particularly difficult month for revenues and margins, more negative surprises may be in store for Q2. Note that the N/P ratio totals 3.6 for Industrials and consumer centric companies.

BTW: Despite higher sales of small farm machinery during the three months ended May 1, Deere said its quarterly profit fell by 20% as its operating margin shrank by nearly 5 percentage points. Quarterly profit from large farm equipment rose 5% from a year earlier, but the profit margin contracted. Deere said it expects to continue raising prices on its equipment. Deere raised its net income forecast for this year by $300 million to a range of $7 billion to $7.4 billion. Deere’s shares fell 19% from $385 on Wednesday to $313 on Friday.

THE GOODS ECONOMY LESS GOOD

On May 15, the Chase consumer card spending tracker was 1.1% above its pre-COVID trend. That’s before adjusting for inflation. Actually, the tracker is 7.3% over its 2019 level. Total CPI since December 2019: +11.6%; CPI-Durable Goods: +22.1%; CPI-Nondurable Goods: +15.9%.

  • End of April: Walmart and Target inventory jumped by 32% and 43%, respectively. Kohl’s was up 40%.
  • Kodak now holds around six months of inventory, compared with three months before the supply-chain challenges began, Mr. Bullwinkle said. During the first quarter, the company reported $247 million in net inventory, up more than 12% from the prior-year period. (…)
  • [Olaplex], The Santa Barbara, Calif.-based company went from having four to five months of supply in the first three months of 2021 to holding six to seven months of inventory by the end of last year’s third quarter. Inventory levels will remain elevated until supply-chain conditions show signs of improvement, according to Mr. Tiziani. (…)
  • Other companies, including energy drinks maker Monster Beverage Corp. , microcontroller chip maker Microchip Technology Inc. and medical equipment company Steris PLC, also said they are carrying higher levels of inventory. (WSJ)

From April’s Senior Loan Officer Survey: “Among the most cited reasons for strengthening demand, major net shares of banks cited increased customer needs to finance inventory and accounts receivable, as well as higher customer investment in plant or equipment.”

Voluntary or involuntary accumulation?

Bespoke finds much business pessimism in the Philly Fed’s latest survey, suggesting involuntary inventory accumulation:

Expectations indices meanwhile are generally more depressed with some readings even near record lows.  As such, the average normalized distance between the current conditions and expectations categories throughout the report have broken out to the highest level since February 1988 and mid-1975 before that. Put differently, there have rarely been times in which the region’s manufacturers have reported such a dramatic difference between healthy current conditions while also holding a pessimistic outlook.

Spread between current conditions and expectations

image image

(Bespoke)

Meanwhile, we know that housing is facing strong headwinds:

(Bespoke)

The Loan Officer Survey revealed “weaker demand for all RRE loans over the first quarter.”

This is happening when the supply side of the equation is swelling:

(Bespoke)

  • On Monday, the industry group representing Canada’s real estate agents said a key metric measuring the balance of power between buyers and sellers — the sales to new listings ratio — was about to tip from favoring sellers to an equal footing. Metropolitan Toronto is already a buyer’s market, Bank of Montreal research shows. Buyers no longer appear eager to purchase properties now to avoid increased prices in the future, the mindset that helped drive Canadian home values up by 50% since the start of the pandemic. (Bloomberg)

Hence:

FIBER: Industrial Commodity Prices Continue to Decline

Despite the recent improvement in U.S. factory output, many industrial commodity prices have weakened. The Industrial Materials Price Index from the Foundation for International Business and Economic Research (FIBER) eased 0.2% last week. It was the fourth consecutive weekly decline and pulled prices 7.1% below the peak in the second week of March.

Prices in the metals group have been under extreme pressure, tumbling 17.0% during the last four weeks. This decline was led by a 23.9% four-week decline in steel scrap prices. The price of zinc, which is used in batteries, fell 19.6% during the last four weeks while aluminum prices were down 13.9% in the last four weeks. Copper scrap prices fell 10.0% in the last four weeks, while tin and lead prices also fell sharply.

Prices in the miscellaneous group also have been under pressure and fell 1.0% last week (-10.0% y/y), led by a 5.6% decline in framing lumber prices. They have fallen by roughly one-half during the last year. Natural rubber prices eased 0.1% last week and have weakened 6.5% during the last four weeks.

Offsetting these weekly declines was a 4.3% increase in prices in the crude oil & benzene group, which have risen by one-quarter during the last year. Crude oil costs alone rose 6.4% last week and were up by roughly three-quarters y/y. The per barrel price of crude oil of $111.75 compared to the $115.64 per barrel high in the second week of March. The price of the petro-chemical benzene rose 10.2% last week and stood 10.8% higher y/y. Excluding crude oil, industrial commodity prices eased 0.5% last week and have fallen 7.3% during the last ten weeks.

Textile group prices recently have trended sideways, near thirty-year highs. Cotton prices increased 2.6% last week and rose 81.4% y/y. The cost of burlap, used for sacks, bags and gardening, eased 0.2% last week and remained near its record high.

 image image

commodity

Bloomberg: “Financial conditions have tightened at the fastest pace this far into a hiking cycle since at least 1987. The financial conditions index, as tracked by Goldman Sachs Group Inc., has fallen 1% since the first rate increase two months ago. The pace of tightening at this stage exceeds all previous five hiking cycles, data compiled by Bloomberg show.”

Financial conditions tightening at fastest rate in decades this far into a hiking cycle

Germany Warns Falling Euro Could Push Inflation Even Higher The comments add pressure on the European Central Bank to reverse its negative rate policy despite concerns about a recession.
Business leaders warn that three-decade era of globalisation is ending
The world’s car buyers are ready to go electric

52% of respondents to EY’s annual Mobility Consumer Index who are looking to buy a car want an EV, according to the survey of 13,000 people in 18 countries.

  • That’s a leap of 22 percentage points in two years, and the first time that EV interest exceeded 50%, the company said.

Consumer interest in electric vehicles has hit a global tipping point, with more than half of car buyers saying they want their next car to be an EV, new research from Ernst & Young shows.

  • Yes, but: Americans still aren’t as enthusiastic as consumers in Europe and Asia.
unnamed - 2022-05-23T070854.590

Data: EY Mobility Consumer Index; Chart: Axios Visuals

  • …. and EVs are shoving aside real volumes of oil

Electric vehicles displaced roughly 1.5 million barrels per day of oil last year, new analysis shows, an amount slated to grow as EV sales keep rising, Ben Geman writes in Axios Generate. (…)

  • The amount EVs have displaced doubled over the last six years, BloombergNEF said.

Reproduced from BloombergNEF; Note: Includes a small number of fuel-cell vehicles; Chart: Axios Visuals

  • “Two- and three-wheeled EVs accounted for 67% of the oil demand avoided in 2021,” the report notes, citing rapid adoption in Asia.
  • Buses were next at 16%, followed by passenger vehicles at 13%, though BloombergNEF adds that they’re the fastest-growing segment.

BloombergNEF said last year’s displaced oil demand amounts to roughly one-fifth of Russia’s pre-invasion exports.

TECHNICALS WATCH

My favorite technical analysis firm’s most valued indicators still reflect an
unhealthy and still-deteriorating market
condition.

Biden Says U.S. Would Intervene Militarily if China Invaded Taiwan President Biden said the U.S. would get involved militarily to defend Taiwan if China tries to take it by force, issuing a stark warning to Beijing during his first trip to Asia as commander in chief.

High five The White House rowed back the comments, saying he simply meant the US would give military equipment to Taiwan, not send troops to defend it. China was angry and warned him not to send the wrong message.

Pointing up Biden also said he’ll review Trump-era tariffs on Chinese imports.

Meaning review and cut.

THE DAILY EDGE: 20 MAY 2022: April Fools

The Q1’22 earnings season is coming to an end. For most companies, the quarter ended in March, but for the last bunch of reporters, it ended in April. The January-for-April swap has made a big difference this year, not only for retailers but also for manufacturers.

WMT, TGT and ROST reported sharply declining profits on rather dismal sales. In their conference calls, they all said that sales softened in March but were particularly weak in April in spite of an April 17 Easter. This chart, posted yesterday, illustrates the monthly trend when factoring in inflation: the red line is nominal growth, blue is sales deflated by total CPI and black is sales deflated by faster rising CPI-Goods (see yesterday’s Daily Edge).

Companies with a February-April quarter ditched a strong January for a weak April. Given the continued rise in costs of all kinds, this one month lag produced much poorer profits compared with companies with a January-March quarter. All 3 companies guided for slow sales and weak profits in Q2 suggesting that May remains weak and that this was not a one-off.

The reality is that most Americans are squeezed and they are reacting in a normal and rational way, cutting discretionary spending and trading down. Meanwhile, corporate costs keep rising, squeezing profit margins, amplified by greater markdowns to get rid of bloated inventories.

Executives will also react normally and rationally, cutting costs (mainly labor) and reducing or cancelling orders. Unable to raise prices as easily, retailers and manufacturers will now balk at rising prices, helping slow goods inflation but meanwhile extending the margin squeeze broadly and globally.

Retailers are not the only victims of the weak April as Fortune’s Jacob Carpenter explains:

Data and networking giant Cisco reported during a quarterly earnings call that China’s aggressive shutdown caused supply shortages that cost the company about $300 million, equal to roughly 2.5% of its revenue. Cisco officials also lowered their guidance for the current quarter and the entire fiscal year, in large part due to uncertainty surrounding Chinese imports, sending shares down 15% in mid-day trading Thursday. (…)

Nearly all major tech companies capped their first quarter of 2022 at the end of March, just days after the Chinese government brought the city of Shanghai, home to 26 million people and the world’s busiest port, to a standstill. Cisco, however, concluded its fiscal third quarter in April, giving it a full month of pain from the Shanghai shutdown. (…)

Cisco CEO Chuck Robbins said demand for the company’s products globally remains robust—even as domestic inflation and higher interest rates batter American markets. But an inability to import hardware parts from China will cause damage for months on end, regardless of whether Shanghai fully reopens as planned in June, Robbins said. Cisco now forecasts year-over-year revenue growth in fiscal 2022 of 2% to 3%, down from estimates made in January of 5.5% to 6.5%.

“When they open up and when they do allow transportation logistics to start up, we believe there is going to be a high degree of congestion,” Robbins said. “We believe that there is going to be lots of competition for ports capacity, airport capacity. Combined with the inbound efforts—trying to get raw materials back into the country, etc.—we just believe that it’s going to be impossible for us to catch up on this issue in Q4.”

Robbins’ outlook bodes poorly for a wide range of businesses, including tech companies, electric automakers, and electronics manufacturers. A Bloomberg analysis of earnings call transcripts and financial statements from the first quarter identified more than 180 companies discussing China and its lockdowns.

Apple already predicted in late April that Chinese shutdowns could cost it $4 billion to $8 billion in the current quarter (the company posted revenue of $97.3 billion in the first three months of 2022). A Nikkei Asia analysis found about half of Apple’s top 200 suppliers operate in Shanghai—though some factories there have remained open, with employees temporarily living on-site.

Microsoft said in late April that extended shutdowns into May would hurt its equipment manufacturing, Surface computer, and Xbox console business.

Tesla has operated its Shanghai plant at less than half-capacity or worse for multiple weeks, per Reuters. The factory accounts for roughly 40% of Tesla’s potential output, though that share will decline as two new plants ramp up this year. Longtime Tesla bull Wedbush Securities lowered its price target on the stock Thursday, calling the China snags “an epic disaster so far in the June quarter.” (…)

Robbins echoed the sentiment on Wednesday’s call, signaling that tech companies will remain tethered to China’s COVID whims for the near-future.
“We did not have a plan for a country to shut down,” Robbins said. “And so it takes time to go out and create that geographic resilience, but our teams are working on all of those kinds of things right now.”

We have seen how investors, shocked by worse than expected sales and profits, reacted: WMT -20%, TGT -29%, ROST -25%, CSCO -18%. These are large, established and profitable companies. Their stocks were not selling at outrageous multiples but nonetheless got hammered. These stocks are not in a valuation correction phase like ARKK type stocks, they are in an earnings recession phase.

If the weak April extends through June, the Q2 earnings season could be pretty tough. In just a few weeks, we will start getting the results of companies with a May quarter end followed by the regular quarter bunch reporting April to June starting in about 7 weeks.

Recall these charts I posted on May 17:

(Bespoke)

Philly Fed points to severe ISM contraction

Next week we will get S&P Global’s flash manufacturing PMIs for May. Look for new order inflows.

Through April, China was already seeing a sharp drop in its export orders:

unnamed - 2022-05-20T070100.475

Global export orders got particularly weak in April, especially at the consumer end:

unnamed - 2022-05-20T070437.979

Yesterday:

The diffusion index for current activity fell 15 points to 2.6 in May, its lowest reading in two years (see Chart). Most firms (57 percent) reported no change in current activity this month, while the share of firms reporting increases (22 percent) narrowly exceeded the share reporting decreases (20 percent). The index for new orders rose 4 points to a reading of 22.1, and the current shipments index climbed 16 points to 35.3, its highest reading since October 2020. 

image

The firms continued to report increases in prices for inputs and their own goods. The prices paid diffusion index — which hit a near-43-year high last month — declined 6 points to 78.9. More than 81 percent of the firms reported increases in input prices, and 17 percent reported no change. The current prices received index edged down 3 points to 51.7. Nearly 52 percent of the firms reported increases in the prices of their own goods, and 47 percent reported no change.

In this month’s special questions, the firms were asked to forecast the changes in prices of their own products and for U.S. consumers over the next four quarters. The firms’ median forecast for the rate of inflation for U.S. consumers over the next year was 6.5 percent, up from 5.0 percent from when the question was last asked in February.

Regarding their own prices over the next year, the firms’ median forecast was for an increase of 5.0 percent, unchanged from February and below the median reported own price change over the past year of 6.0 percent. The firms expect their employee compensation costs (wages plus benefits on a per employee basis) to rise 5.0 percent over the next four quarters, the same as in February. The firms’ median forecast for the long-run (10-year average) inflation rate was 3.5 percent, up from 3.0 percent in February.

(…) While firms generally expected conditions to improve over the next six months, optimism waned for a third consecutive month. The index or future business activity fell eleven points to 18.8, its lowest reading in well over a year. Strong gains in employment, wages, and prices are expected in the months ahead.

image

image

American Stores Have Too Much of the Wrong Stuff Walmart, Kohl’s, Target and other retailers have seen a surge of inventory as they find themselves carrying too much stuff that consumers no longer want so much of.

(…) The latest indication was from Kohl’s, KSS 4.43% which reported Thursday that inventory rose 40% in the quarter ended April 30 compared with a year earlier. A third of that $1 billion increase was a planned stock-up of cosmetics for new Sephora stores inside Kohl’s, a fifth is in-transit merchandise as the company accounts for longer lead times in the supply chain and roughly 8% are Christmas wares that arrived late. Even after accounting for those, though, it still leaves Kohl’s with about 16.5% more merchandise in a year when the company expects overall revenue to stay flat or up 1%. Walmart WMT -2.74% and Target, which reported earnings earlier this week, saw inventory swell by 32% and 43% in the latest quarter, respectively.

Off-price retailers Burlington and Ross Stores ROST -0.11% indicated that they saw closeout inventory start to skyrocket in late February and early March, said Michael Binetti, equity analyst at Credit Suisse, who hosted recent meetings with both companies. (…)

Kohl’s, Target and TJX Cos. all said sales in the home category declined last quarter, for example (Kohl’s posted a 17% drop.) [Same at ROST] (…)

Both Target and Walmart hinted at a more promotional selling environment, which will likely lead retailers’ stretched margins to contract. (…)

U.S. Index of Leading Indicators Fell in April

The Conference Board’s Composite Leading Economic Indicators index fell 0.3% m/m (4.7% y/y) in April after rising 0.1% m/m in March, revised from 0.3%. The Action Economics Forecast Survey had expected no change in April. This was the second monthly decline in the past four months.

The Leading Index is comprised of 10 components which historically have portended changes in overall economic activity. Five of the index’s components fell in April, one was unchanged and four increased. The overall decline was attributed mostly to weak building permits and declining consumer expectations. The still positively sloped Treasury yield curve made the largest contribution.

The Index of Coincident Economic Indicators rose 0.4% (3.0% y/y) in April following a 0.3% m/m increase in March, revised from 0.4%. Each of the index’s four components (nonagricultural employment, personal income less transfers, real manufacturing and trade sales, and industrial production) rose in April.

The Index of Lagging Economic Indicators increased 0.4% m/m (4.2% y/y) in April, down from a 0.7% m/m gain in March, revised from 0.6%. Three of the index’s seven components contributed positively to the overall increase in April, led by commercial and industrial loans, while three subtracted with one unchanged.

image

From Advisor Perspectives:

For a better understanding of the relationship between the LEI and recessions, the next chart shows the percentage-off the previous peak for the index and the number of months between the previous peak and official recessions.

Smoothed LEI

Profits and Margins Plunge In Q1: Expect More Margin Contraction As Fed Squeezes Inflation

Based on the preliminary data from the GDP report, operating profits fell roughly 10% in Q1 relative to Q4. A decline of that magnitude would drop aggregate company profits back to the Q1 2021 level, or nearly $300 billion below the record level of Q4 2021.

The plunge in operating profits reflects a sharp drop in margins. Real operating profit margins for Non-Financial Companies hit a record high of 15.9% in Q2 2021, dropped to 15.2% in Q4, and probably fell 100 to 150 basis points in Q1 2022. To be sure, Q1 earnings reports from large companies such as Amazon, Wal-Mart, and Target confirm a sharp contraction in operating margins due to rising input costs.

More margin contraction lies ahead, especially if the Fed successfully squeezes inflation to 2%, down from 8%, and limits any significant fallout in the labor markets. For reported consumer price inflation to drop 600 basis points over the next year or so, producer prices for many companies involved in production and distribution would drop twice as much, if not more. And if overall labor costs are unchanged, the hit to profit margins, or the ratio of profits from sales after all expenses, will be significant.

Past cyclical slowdowns offer some perspective on significant margin contraction when monetary policy simultaneously slows demand and price inflation. For example, in 2000, consumer price inflation dropped 200 basis points, but producer prices for finished goods and intermediate materials fell between 600 and 1000 basis points. That dropped triggered the most significant cyclical contraction in real profit margins (700 basis points).

The potential disruption to business operations in 2022 is more significant than in 2000 because the Fed faces a bigger inflation problem. That means a substantial decline in operating margins is the most considerable risk to the equity market. Investors forewarned.

U.S. Existing Home Sales Continue to Fall in April as Houses Become Less Affordable

Existing home sales declined 2.4% (-5.9% y/y) during April to 5.61 million (SAAR) from 5.75 million in March, revised from 5.77 million. It was the lowest level of sales since June 2020 according to the National Association of Realtors (NAR). The Action Economics Forecast Survey expected a smaller decline in sales to 5.65 million units in April.

The fall in existing home sales included a 2.5% decline (-4.8% y/y) in single-family home sales to 4.99 million, a 22-month low, from 5.12 million in March. In fact, single-family home sales have reversed all of their post-pandemic gains. Sales of condos and co-ops weakened 1.6% (-13.9% y/y) to 620,000, the lowest level since July 2020.

Home sales in all regions of the country have deteriorated in the past three months from their recent highs. Sales in the South were off 4.6% to 2.49 million in April, down 15.3% from January. In the West, sales fell 5.8% in April to 1.14 million, down 10.2% from January. Although existing home sales in the Northeast ticked up 1.5% to 670,000, these sales were down 14.1% from January. Likewise, sales in the Midwest increased 3.2% to 1.31 million, but were nevertheless down 12.7% from January. (…)

On a y/y basis, which eliminates much of the seasonality, the supply of homes on the market was 10.4% lower. The supply of homes on the market remains extremely low at 2.2 months at the current selling rate. For comparison, the months’ supply hovered around 4.0 in the years prior to the pandemic. (…)

The median price of an existing home increased 4.4% (14.8% y/y) to a record $391,200 last month, with gains in all major regions. The average price of an existing home rose 2.9% (9.2% y/y) to $397,600 in April. The price data are not seasonally adjusted. (…)

According to the NAR, housing affordability has fallen sharply in recent months. As a result, NAR calculates that the qualifying income for a new home has increased by 20.9% since the start of the year to $72,096. The decline in affordability is one reason for the recent sharp drop in existing home sales.

 image
China Unexpectedly Cuts Key Rate as Growth Crumbles China’s central bank cut a benchmark interest rate, a shift that economists said would likely help the moribund housing market but bring only limited relief to the struggling economy.

(…) The People’s Bank of China on Friday cut its benchmark rate for loans of five years or more to 4.45% from 4.6%, the biggest single reduction since the rate entered the bank’s policy armory in 2019. It had made a 0.1 percentage-point cut in early 2020.

The rate is used to price most mortgages, and the cut follows a decision by the central bank Sunday to lower the floor for rates on home loans to first-time buyers.

The cut was unexpected, given that the earlier this week central bank had left unchanged another key policy rate, charged on loans from a medium-term lending facility that funnels cash to commercial banks. On Friday, the PBOC said it would also keep the benchmark rate for one-year loans unchanged at 3.7%. (…)

The PBOC’s cautious response to China’s slowdown shows how the U.S. Federal Reserve’s interest-rate policy is rippling around the world.

The prospect of rapid interest-rate increases in the U.S. is sucking capital out of China and other developing and emerging markets as investors chase better returns. China’s debt and equity markets posted a net outflow of $43 billion in the first quarter, the largest on record, according to the Institute of International Finance, an industry association based in Washington, D.C.

As well as possibly intensifying capital outflows, easing too aggressively would also risk weakening the currency, potentially spurring inflation and testing the limits of China’s managed exchange-rate system. (…)

The gravitational pull from tighter Fed policy is being felt across Asia, adding to pressure on the region’s central banks to jack up interest rates to restrain accelerating inflation.

The central banks of India, the Philippines and Malaysia raised rates this month, joining a policy shift already under way in economies including South Korea and Singapore. Indonesia’s central bank and the Bank of Thailand are expected to begin tightening within months, leaving China and Japan as the only major economies still in easing mode. (…)

MAZES!

The word “maze” dates from the 13th century and comes from the Middle English word mæs, denoting delirium or delusion. The maze is the very symbol of confusion and disorientation, the trap that confounds efforts to escape.

Now, find your way, if you can.

@TimmerFidelity

Also trying to find his way in his own maze:

image

WSJ

unnamed - 2022-05-19T103611.911

Chart: Danielle Alberti/Axios

When I first put this flow chart together over the weekend, my best guess was that it would go “yes” all the way and that Musk would end up buying Twitter at a small discount to his original $54.20 offer.

  • Since then, Musk’s literal -posting (he fired off the poop emoji at Twitter’s CEO) has vaporized the goodwill needed for the two sides to come to any new agreement.
  • As a result, the chances of this ending up in the Delaware Court of Chancery have never been higher.

If it does end up in court, the judge will be well within her rights to grant Twitter “specific performance” — that is, to order Musk to buy the company, as he is contractually obliged to do.

  • If he disobeys that order, no one has a clue what might happen.

Does even a Delaware court have any appetite to get into a massive fight with Elon Musk?

Go deeper: I went into detail this weekend about specific performance and the reason why Musk can’t just walk away from the deal while paying a $1 billion termination fee.

This is a financial farce in need of an ending that ensures that the mega-rich also follow the rules. Another example of what too much money can do…