The enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it’s the illusion of knowledge (Stephen Hawking)

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so (Mark Twain)

Invest with smart knowledge and objective odds

THE DAILY EDGE: 9 FEBRUARY 2022: Spac, Crackle and Pop!

USD Inflation Preview: Higher but fading momentum

Our calculations suggest that headline and core inflation will print at 7.4% y/y and 5.9% y/y, respectively. The consumption patterns of American households is slowly but surely set to converge towards its pre-pandemic normal, which should alleviate price pressure for goods. Yet, last year’s joker – the used cars and vehicles component – rose again in January and lifts US inflation to new cycle-highs.

For the January print we expect the used car inflation component to have risen by approximately 40% y/y. Furthermore, changes to CPI basket weights were updated 8 February and show an increase in the weights of used cars and shelter costs and hence towards the prices that are rising the most and, in turn, skewing the risk to the upside and underscoring the larger uncertainty for Thursday’s release.

Looking into monthly changes, our preferred leading indicator for used vehicles prices – the Manheim Index – points to a moderation in car prices over the coming months. The monthly changes in the Manheim index have been sliding since October. In January, this index only showed an increase of 0.04% m/m substantially lower than the last monthly peak of 9.2% m/m in October. The closely related wholesales car price index also points to moderation. Nonetheless, slowing car prices increases is first likely to be a determining factor in some months’ time if the used cars inflation continues to follow the Manheim index with a small lag.

x(…) the million dollar question for 2022 remains whether wage growth will persist as base effects start to kick in. While the employment headline was stellar it masks underlying slowing. Aggregate production hours are down and so are weekly hourly earnings deflated by CPI. The story was similar for the 6.9% annualized Q4 GDP – inventory growth contributed with more than 2/3 of the total growth as consumption slowed. (…)

Chipotle CEO Says Another Menu-Price Increase Likely The burrito chain said it raised prices again, a moved that helped boost sales in recent months, and is likely to increase them further as it looks to build hundreds more stores this year.

(…) It raised prices by 4% in December, with menu prices now up around 10% overall compared with last year, the company said. Chipotle’s same-stores sales were up 15.2% for the period compared with last year. (…)

“I just don’t see the inflation, unfortunately, going away anytime soon,” said Mr. Niccol. He said he’s “chuckled” about comments made earlier in the pandemic about cost increases being short-term: “It sure doesn’t look transitory to me.”

Starbucks Corp. , McDonald’s Corp. and many other chains said they have increased prices as costs have grown and expect inflation to continue to be a concern this year.

Chipotle raised prices on its meals last year, saying it was particularly to help cover the cost of wage increases for hourly workers. [Somebody please forward this the Jerome Powell]. (…)

The company said Tuesday that the Omicron variant of Covid-19 began to weigh on its sales growth in December and last month. (…)

Canadian banks increased their pay per worker 6.3% in fiscal 2021, more than twice the average boost in the previous three years, as inflation and competition make it costlier to attract and retain employees.

The gain was driven in large part by last year’s 18% increase in bonuses as financial firms rewarded investment bankers and traders who had posted two straight years of strong results. With those workers in especially high demand, banks are opening their wallets to keep top talent from jumping to rival firms. (…)

Royal Bank of Canada CEO David McKay said earlier this month the battle for tech talent was among his top concerns for the year, and that banks have never faced more competition for workers in engineering, artificial intelligence, data, mathematics and coding. (…)

Toyota Cuts Production Target Due to Chip Shortages but Keeps Profit Outlook
U.S. Households Took On $1 Trillion in New Debt in 2021 The increase, the largest since 2007, was largely the result of a big jump in mortgages and auto loans.

Total household debt rose by $1.02 trillion last year, boosted by higher balances on home and auto loans, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York said Tuesday. It was the largest increase since a $1.06 trillion jump in 2007. Total consumer debt now sits at around $15.6 trillion, compared with $14.6 trillion a year earlier.

The increase is largely a function of a sharp rise in prices for homes and cars. (…)

Delinquency levels on consumer loans are still hovering around record lows.

What’s more, some 87% of the new debt is tied to homes that can appreciate over time, allowing borrowers to build wealth. Today’s home buyers also are in better financial shape. Subprime borrowers accounted for just 2% of the mortgage debt originated in the fourth quarter of 2021, down from an average of 12% in the years before the financial crisis.

Americans added $52 billion to their credit-card balances in the fourth quarter, the largest quarterly jump on record, the New York Fed said in its quarterly report on household debt and credit, which is based on data from Equifax Inc. credit reports. Pent-up demand for travel and entertainment purchases that consumers were unable or willing to make earlier in the pandemic boosted credit-card balances in the final three months of the year. (…)

EARNINGS WATCH

We now have 298 reports in, a 78% beat rate and a +5.2% surprise factor.

Trailing EPS are now $208.63, forward: $224.98.

So far this week, 7 companies offered guidance, 2 up, 4 down:

image

Rosenberg Research’s own tally reveals that of 41 sales guidance for Q1, 32% were weaker and 68% unchanged. None increased.

Q4 2021 Retail Preview: Supply Chain Problems Continue

In its last earning call, Gap said it incurred approximately $450 million in airfreight costs to meet customer demand. The retailer had to deliver by air approximately 35% of its holiday product due to delays from its Vietnam manufacturing closures in Q3 and the West Coast port delays (Source: Gap Q3 2021 Earnings Call).

Although these costs are deemed necessary to move inventory, they inflict a huge hit on a retailer’s profitability. Gap reported a 7.6% EBITDA margin in Q3 2021. However, this is expected to drop to 1.8% in Q4 2021, according to Refinitiv I/B/E/S estimates. This would mark its lowest EBITDA margin since the first quarter of 2020.

Gap EBITDA Margin

Source: I/B/E/S data from Refinitiv

Similarly, Refinitiv data shows that supply issues continue to hit the companies below and are also expected to see a decline in EBITDA in the current quarter. (…)

Decline in EBITDA Margins

Source: I/B/E/S data from Refinitiv

In addition to the 16 Q12022 negative preannouncements and four positive for EPS, retailers posted 21 negative and fourteen positive revenue forecasts. The bulk of the Q1 2022 negative guidance (43.8%) comes from the household durables sector.

Q4 Earnings and Revenue Guidance

Source: I/B/E/S data from Refinitiv

A look at ‘FAANMG’ Stocks vs. S&P 500: Margins, Valuation, Earnings

(…) Year-to-date, the FAANMG index declined 9.7% on a cap-weighted basis vs. a decline of 6.5% for the S&P 500.  On an equal-weight basis, the FAANMG index declined 14.0% vs. a decline of 4.4% for the S&P 500 equal-weighted index. (…)

With the January sell-off, the forward 12-month P/E ratio for the FAANMG Index declined almost five turns from 32.8x to 28.2x.  This compares to a forward P/E of 20.3x for the S&P 500, marking a 38.9% premium which is slightly above the historical 10-year average premium of 29.2%. (…)

FAANMG stocks continue to deliver robust top-line growth and strong margins.  Exhibit 3 shows how strong EBITDA margins are for the FAANMG index, which currently reads 33.0%, dwarfing the average EBITDA margin of 20.3% for the S&P 500 and 12.4% for the Russell 2000 Index. (…)

2022 looks to be a tough year for FAANMG from an earnings growth perspective, mainly due to difficult year-over-year comparisons.  It is currently expected to deliver weaker earnings growth compared to the S&P 500 in three of the four quarters (22Q1, 22Q2, and 22Q4).  Looking at FY2022 growth rates, S&P 500 is expected to deliver earnings growth of 7.7% compared to 1.2% for FAANMG on an aggregated basis. (…)

Earnings Growth for FAANMG and S&P 500

TECHNICALS WATCH

More tech stocks try to make longer-term recoveries

(…) While the Nasdaq is considered a tech index, that’s not entirely accurate. Even so, there has been a recovery in long-term trends, specifically among Technology stocks. After fewer than 25% of Technology sector stocks were trading above their 200-day moving averages, enough recovered so that most of them were above their averages. (…)

It’s generally better for Tech stocks if we see a thrust with more than 60% of them trading above their 200-day averages. So far, it’s been hovering below 60%, which is what an unhealthy market does. We can see from the chart above that the total return on Technology stocks since 1952 was only 7.7% when the percentage of members was neutral, between 40% – 60%.

When it was below 40%, we got the opportunity to enjoy oversold snapbacks. When it was above 60%, the zone where the stocks saw their best annualized returns, it coincided with periods of positive momentum. We have neither right now. (…)

The selling pressure this year, especially in stocks that inhabit the Nasdaq exchange, including Technology stocks, has been extreme. We’ve now seen a modest recovery, suggesting the worst could be over. But it’s not a strong signal. We haven’t seen an opposing reaction, a multi-day move with an overwhelming amount of buying interest. So far, it looks like an oversold relief rally, and while returns after similar moves were positive, it would be better if we see more of a surge in interest among buyers.

The Case Against a Bear Market, Per Ned Davis Stocks have had a rotten start this year, but they won’t get too much worse, the research firm says.

(…) “The January market decline is thus better described as a stiff rotational correction than the start of a new bear market,” wrote Tim Hayes, the firm’s chief global investment strategist.

He noted that not all countries’ equities are doing this poorly. “If a cyclical bear was getting started, we would not expect such bifurcated performance,” Hayes said. “Typically, in a developing bear, worries about a deteriorating macro environment spread globally, sending markets downward in sync.”

He’s got a point: Britain, Singapore, and Hong Kong are all positive. And the MSCI All World Index ex-USA is off 4.9%, a much better showing than the US’s market. Among MSCI indexes, 17 are ahead this year, and 14 of them are in emerging markets (EMs), the report indicated. Examples: Nigeria, up 8.5% for 2022, and Brazil, ahead 7.4%.

Ned Davis’ in-house indicators don’t show that the market will descend to a bearish level. “Oversold with pessimism extreme, the major equity benchmarks have been testing Monday’s intraday lows this [past] week, apparently building a base to be followed by renewed rallying,” Hayes declared. “The global bull market uptrend remains intact.”

To bolster his correction-only thesis, Hayes argued that what has happened to once-dominant tech stocks underscores that the sector’s prices were simply too lofty to be sustained. And don’t betoken a pan-market dive.

“In bailing out of technology, investors have sold the sector that’s been the most overvalued and most prone to underperform when bond yields are rising,” he wrote.

Certainly, the Nasdaq 100, home to the tech leaders such as Apple and Microsoft, is in correction turf, down almost 13% from its November high, much lower than the S&P 500.

“And that makes it likely that the bad news has been priced in and that a bottoming process is under way,” Hayes contended. “The indicator mix is currently more consistent with the end of a correction than the onset of a new bear.”

How much the Federal Reserve will boost interest rates, which could crimp stocks, is a matter of much debate and trepidation. Hayes conceded that rates could mess things up and “could lead to warnings.” Some indicators that Ned Davis watches might then take a bad turn, he said.

But the chief gauge of market unrest, the CBOE Volatility Index or VIX, has yet to reach “the level that would add a bearish signal to the report.”

Note: Yes, the MSCI All World Index ex-USA did better than the US’s market in January but that was after dropping 6.1% in the second half of 2021. Nigeria? Brazil? Down 30% and 33% respectively during 2021. And both up last month on commodity rallies.

acwx

Left hug Right hug WILL YOU MARRY ME? PLEASE! PLEASE!

Goldman Sachs says that “more than 500 active SPACs with $144 billion in equity capital are currently searching for a target. 88 active SPACs are set to expire this year and 318 are set to expire in 1H 2023, presenting the possibility of a logjam of deal closures. The median active SPAC is 13 months away from expiration. (…)

238 SPACs completed an acquisition in 2021, by far the largest year ever. The median de-SPAC in our universe has declined by 43% during the last 6 months, in line with the longest duration or unprofitable stocks. The typical de-SPAC has had its EV/Sales nearly cut in half since the start of 4Q 2021 (from 2.8x to 1.5x EV/Sales). (…)

dspac

Only 19% of de-SPACs were profitable over the last 12 months and consensus expects just 28% will be profitable in the coming year. (…)

Many of these de-SPACs are likely to undergo significant share offerings relative to their float caps in the coming years as management teams, the SPAC sponsors, and existing holders have their first opportunities to sell down. Since the start of 2020, de-SPACs in our universe have typically returned -10% and -22% in the one and six months after a follow-on equity offering. (…)

A bunch of horny and well-endowed grooms “Desperately Seeking Susan” within a very short time window. Many embellished Susans will jump to the occasion and write their own prenup. Dangerous liaisons, getting more and more dangerous as we approach expiry dates…

Spac, crackle…and pop!

There Are Now 1,000 Unicorn Startups Worth $1 Billion or More Almost a decade after the term “unicorn” was coined to describe a rare breed of private company, about two new companies are joining the herd daily.

(…) In January, 42 startups became unicorns and four became “decacorns”—the clumsy nickname given to startups worth $10 billion or more. “When you have 1,000 unicorns,” says Brian Lee, who oversees research at CB Insights, “that’s almost an oxymoron.” (…)

Even in the face of volatile public markets, inflation, and rising interest rates, the mood among private market investors appears to be as ebullient as ever. Some of that undaunted growth is valid, says Lee: As more of the world’s services become digital, software companies become more valuable, and infrastructure such as Amazon Web Services makes it easier than ever to start a tech business. (…)

There’s a shocking amount of investment money looking for a home—$621 billion into startups of all kinds in 2021. That’s more than double the 2020 amount and exceeds the capital raised through IPOs over the same period, which itself was a record. Low interest rates and record-breaking paydays when private companies finally go public or get acquired have caught the hungry eyes of investors who have traditionally focused on public markets. (…)

FYI

THE DAILY EDGE: 8 FEBRUARY 2022

Data dependent? Good luck!

(…) The most striking thing about these newly revised numbers is that the labor market appears to have been more or less insensitive to the state of the pandemic last year. Job growth tailed off modestly in September when the delta wave was peaking, but otherwise, it’s basically impossible to spot COVID’s impact with the naked eye.

Why were the initial jobs reports so far off in 2021? It seems to have to do with the adjustment process the Labor Department uses to smooth out the impact of seasonal hiring and layoffs in the data. That process appears to have gone utterly haywire, thanks to the unprecedented job swings of 2020 and 2021, and only with this last round of revisions have the government’s statisticians been able to fix it.

Chart showing month to month job growth in 2021 before and after revisions

Jordan Weissmann/Slate

Still, note the diminishing contributions of employment and hours to aggregate payrolls since September, offset by rising hourly earnings.

image

Wages of production and nonsupervisory employees are up 6.9% YoY in January and up at a 7.7% annualized rate in the last 3 months. Their bosses’ wages are up 5.7% YoY an 6.8% a.r. in the last 3 months. Nothing transitory there.

fredgraph - 2022-02-07T160705.082

Goldman Sachs’ composition-adjusted wage tracker has accelerated to a 6% annualized rate over the past 2-3 quarters.

With core PCE inflation running at about a 5% rate over the past 3, 6 and 12 months, this raises the question whether we are already in the middle of a wage-price spiral that will need to be broken by aggressive Fed rate hikes and a large tightening in financial conditions.

So far, we don’t see a spiral where wage and price inflation feed on each other while expectations become unanchored to the high side. Our wage survey leading indicator remains consistent with just under 4% growth, as does a narrower set of business surveys that ask specifically about compensation budgets for 2022.

And while short-term inflation expectations have surged, longer-term forward inflation expectations—whether measured via bond yields, forecaster surveys, or household surveys—remain well anchored. Taken together, these observations suggest that firms, households, and market participants still expect the current wage and price surge to level off as the economy emerges more fully from the pandemic.

But the U.S. second largest employer seems to think differently:

Amazon Is Raising Base Salary Cap to $350,000 From $160,000

(…) “This past year has seen a particularly competitive labor market, and in doing a thorough analysis of various options, weighing the economics of our business and the need to remain competitive for attracting and retaining top talent, we decided to make meaningfully bigger increases to our compensation levels than we do in a typical year,” the company told employees Monday in a memo reviewed by Bloomberg.

Amazon also said it was increasing the compensation ranges of most jobs globally and is changing the timing of stock awards to align with promotions.

Like many big employers, Amazon has struggled to hire and retain workers of late. The company has long relied on stock awards, betting it can entice workers to take positions even if the base pay is low. But the stock languished in 2021, gaining just 2.4% while the S&P 500 jumped 27%, and the strategy began to lose its appeal. Media reports indicate the turnover rate inside Amazon has reached crisis levels, and a record 50 vice presidents departed last year.

The e-commerce giant employed 1.6 million globally as of Dec. 31, including warehouse workers who are paid hourly and office staff who earn annual salaries. (…)

Amazon pays warehouse workers at least $15 an hour and in September said it had raised average wages for these employees to $18 an hour. (…)

And a Bloomberg survey reveals that:

  • About 55% say that they are likely to seek out job offers from other companies to get raises at their current firms, according to a nationally representative survey conducted by The Harris Poll for Bloomberg News.
  • If offered outside roles, nearly two thirds said they would quit their current jobs. Millennials are the most likely to jump ship, followed by Gen Z, Gen X and Boomers. Among workers likely to ask for a raise soon, nearly all say inflation is a factor in their decision and a majority cited the current economic climate. (…)
  • Some 61% say using a job offer from another company for the sole purpose of receiving a pay raise is an ethical practice.

Goldman’s Jan Hatzius goes on in his piece “The Slowdown That We Need”:

With all that said, we do put a significant amount of weight on the wage acceleration. Even if wage growth comes down from 6% to 5%, as we expect, this would imply unit labor cost inflation of at least 3% assuming productivity rises no more than 2%. If it persists, such a pace would be too high for achieving the Fed’s 2% PCE inflation target. This raises the risk that Fed officials would want to see an even bigger slowdown in output and employment growth than we are currently forecasting, to a pace no faster than the long-term trend.

How much additional monetary policy tightening would be needed? (…) Based on our estimated rules of thumb, this would require an incremental 50-100bp of FCI [Financial Conditions Index] tightening, which in turn could be brought about by an incremental 50-100bp of Fed rate hikes. Importantly, the added Fed tightening would need to come on top of the amount that is currently discounted in the yield curve, and thus in our FCI.

All else equal, this suggests that markets will have to revise up their estimate of the terminal funds rate from the current 1.7% to roughly our own 2½-2¾% forecast, or else the Fed may need to deliver more than the five 25bp hikes that are currently priced for 2022 (and included in our own forecast). If it is the latter, we think an even longer series of up to seven 25bp moves this year is more likely than a turn to 50bp moves. (…)

The broadening of wage and price pressures across the advanced economies implies that growth needs to slow and financial conditions need to tighten at an earlier stage of the recovery than previously expected. Consistent with this, our core market views are an increase in riskless yields, a widening of IG and HY credit spreads, and a combination of lower expected returns and bigger potential drawdowns in the major DM equity markets relative to the post-covid recovery so far. At this point, our baseline remains that this will be sufficient to slow growth and bring inflation back toward central bank targets over the next 1-2 years. But the risk of a harder landing will rise if US growth stays significantly above our below-consensus forecast.

But what if growth turns out significantly lower than expected:

Global economy sees inflation pressures persist as growth slows

(…) While the outlook for inflation looks to be tilted toward persistent elevated price pressures, as high wage and energy costs collude with ongoing supply shortages in the coming months, the outlook for economic growth is less certain, especially in the face of increased policy tightening among major central banks.

Just as global economic growth slowed to an 18-month low at the start of 2022 amid rising COVID-19 infection rates, price pressures intensified. The JPMorgan Global PMI™ (compiled by IHS Markit) showed average prices charged for goods and services rising at a rate beaten only once over the comparable PMI survey 12-year history (in October 2021).

Global PMI output and selling pricesunnamed - 2022-02-08T065346.349

Rates of selling price inflation accelerated in both manufacturing and services at a time of output growth faltering to only modest rates in both sectors.

Looking in more detail within the sectors, selling prices rose in all 26 detailed sectors of the global economy covered by the PMI surveys. (…)

Measured globally, the elevated PMI selling price gauge points to persistent high inflation in coming months. However, it is important to note that the drivers of inflation are showing signs of changing. (…)

Global PMI selling prices and inflationunnamed - 2022-02-08T065634.206

The number of PMI survey contributors reporting that energy prices had increased to an all-time high worldwide in January (comparable data extend back to 2004), matched by a record high in the number of service providers reporting that their expenses had been pushed higher by rising staff costs, in turn linked to deteriorating labour availability, exacerbated in January by the Omicron wave.

unnamed - 2022-02-08T065913.156

The escalation of energy and wage price pressures in coming months therefore adds to risks that the recent elevated rate of inflation in many countries could persist for longer than previously expected, which will in turn add to pressure on central banks to tighten monetary policy.

However, while the odds are clearly pointing to persistent inflation, risks to the outlook for output (and GDP) are more balanced. Growth will likely accelerate again globally once the worst of the Omicron wave passes, but demand forces have waned in recent months amid various headwinds. These include high inflation, squeezed real incomes, ongoing supply constraints and the withdrawal of pandemic-related fiscal stimuli. By tightening monetary policy, how much do central banks further tilt risks towards growth slowing?

Omicron is taking the blame for the recent declines in output. But under the surface:

Inflows of new business slowed globally in January to the weakest since February of last year. The new business index signalled weakening demand growth in both manufacturing and services.

Global new order inflowsunnamed - 2022-02-08T070310.370

Part of the softer demand picture is likely to be temporary, resulting from reduced economic activity arising from the Omicron wave. As containment measures are lifted, demand should revive. However, it is important to note that the number of companies reporting higher orders due to a demand recovery has been on a marked downward trend since peaking early in the pandemic, falling in January to a level below the long-run trend for the first time since April 2020. (…)

unnamed - 2022-02-08T070501.750

Note that S&P 500 companies revenues are up 10.1% ex-Energy in Q4’21 but growth is currently seen slowing to +8.2% in Q1’22 and to +6.6% in Q4’22. That assumes that the current consensus on GDP is correct.

Ten-year yields are back to their pre-covid level when the S&P 500 was at 3400. It is up 32% since while profits are up 26%. So the P/E rose from 20.6 to 21.6. The big difference is inflation (2.3% vs 5.5%), wage pressures and clearly hawkish central bankers.

image
  • Equities saw positive returns during previous periods of rate hikes. But this time, the Fed will be acting “into an overvalued market,” BofA strategists said. The tightening  cycle that started in 1999 is the closest historical precedent, they added. And the outcome of that—the bursting of the tech bubble—certainly left a bad taste behind.

unnamed - 2022-02-08T073343.688

Inflation Continues Impact on Small Businesses

The NFIB Small Business Optimism Index decreased slightly in January to 97.1, down 1.8 points from December. Inflation remains a problem for small businesses as 22% of owners reported that inflation was their single most important business problem, unchanged from December when it reached the highest level since 1981. The net percent of owners raising average selling prices increased four points to a net 61% (seasonally adjusted), the highest reading since the fourth quarter of 1974.

“More small business owners started the New Year raising prices in an attempt to pass on higher inventory, supplies, and labor costs,” said NFIB Chief Economist Bill Dunkelberg. “In addition to inflation issues, owners are also raising compensation at record high rates to attract qualified employees to their open positions.” (…)

Price hikes were the most frequent in wholesale (88% higher, 3% lower), manufacturing (71% higher, 1% lower), retail (69% higher, 4% lower), and construction (67% higher, 5% lower). Seasonally adjusted, a net 47% of owners plan price hikes. (…)

image
image
image
Middle Class Getting Priced Out of Covid Housing Market The surge in home prices and sharp decline in the number of homes for sale have made home buying more difficult, as affordability worsens for many during the pandemic.

(…) At the end of last year, there were about 411,000 fewer homes on the market that were considered affordable for households earning between $75,000 and $100,000 than before the pandemic, the [NAR] study found. At the end of 2019, there was one available listing that was affordable for every 24 households in this income bracket. By December 2021, the figure was one listing for every 65 households. (…)

The study found that housing affordability worsened over the past two years for all but the very wealthiest Americans, and the shrinking number of homes on the market made home buying more difficult in every income bracket. (…)

Households earning between $75,000 and $100,000 could afford to buy 51% of the active housing inventory in December, NAR said, down from 58% in December 2019. That 7-percentage-point drop was the second-biggest decline among all income brackets, behind households earning between $100,000 and $125,000, where affordability slipped 8 percentage points to 63% of the listed homes. (…)

Current homeowners are in good shape: from the Mortgage Monitor:

Tappable equity climbed to a new record over 2021, hitting an aggregate total of $9.9T. That represents an astounding 35% annual growth rate – for an increase of $2.6T in tappable equity in a single year, with $450B (+5%) of that coming in Q4 2021 alone. As a result, the average mortgage holder has $185K in equity available to them before hitting a maximum combined loan-to-value ratio of 80%, a one year increase of $48K.

image

Others, not so much:

It now takes 25.8% of the median household income to purchase the average-priced home with 20% down and a 30-year mortgage, up from the 22.4% required at the end of Q3 2021. Interest rate jumps in recent weeks have pushed us – and quite quickly – above the long-term, pre-Great Recession average payment-to-income ratio of 25%, straight to the worst affordability levels since 2008.”

While a 20.5% ratio has been the tipping point between market acceleration and deceleration over the past decade, severe inventory shortfalls are keeping home prices running hotter than they might otherwise.unnamed - 2022-02-08T073540.493

BTW: “Condo price growth also continues to outpace that of single-family homes as buy side demand has depleted available condo inventory » According to Collateral Analytics data, the shortage of condo inventory across the country is now worse than that of single-family residences.”

From another WSJ article:

  • First-time buyers made up 34% of all home buyers in 2021, compared with 31% in 2020, according to a National Association of Realtors survey. Nationwide, first-time home buyers paid a median price of $252,000 in 2021, more than 9.5% higher than in 2020, said NAR. (…)
  • The average cost to care for a single-family home rose 9.3% to $4,886 in 2021, compared with the prior year, driven in part by labor and material shortages, according to online-services marketplace Thumbtack Inc.

U.S. Agrees to Lift Trump-Era Tariffs on Japanese Steel The agreement removes a longstanding irritant in the bilateral relations between the two allies and follows a similar agreement with the European Union in October.

EARNINGS WATCH

We now have 281 reports in, a 78% beat rate and a +4.9% surprise factor.

Trailing EPS are now $208.63, forward: $224.98.

Yesterday, 5 companies offered guidance, 2 up, 3 down:

image

France says Putin is moving towards de-escalating Ukraine crisis Russia’s president agrees not to undertake new military initiatives in region, according to Paris