The enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it’s the illusion of knowledge (Stephen Hawking)

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so (Mark Twain)

Invest with smart knowledge and objective odds

PANDEMONIUM

March 16, 2020

In a splash, the salmon pounds on your drifting fly. You seldom see that coming. Your reel screams. Zzzzzzzz. He’s an angry wild missile, darting through the water, pulling your line, hard. You forgot how strong he can be. Or did you ever know it?

As he furiously pulls the line, it hits you: did you thoroughly check the leader before casting? The strength of this thin nylon string between the line and the fly suddenly becomes crucial. A quick, superficial assessment is not enough. You must feel its whole length, check its fiber, to really appreciate its capabilities to fight any salmon. You never know what will hit you.

The level of confidence in the leader dictates the angler’s behavior. A strong leader allows for an aggressive, quick landing. An uncertain or weak leader calls for caution, patience, especially with a big, nasty salmon.

He knows he’s in trouble. He’s truly scared, crazy scared. He goes back and forth, pulls, hard, stops, pulls again, jumps, head shakes. He tries to reach the faster current. He’s testing the leader, he’s testing me, my fortitude, my staying power.

***

The Rule of 20 once again proved its usefulness. Valuation matters.

As the chart clearly shows, the Rule of 20 P/E (black line) invariably cycles between overvaluation and undervaluation within a fairly steady range across times and economic/financial episodes.

image

Reversal triggers can vary but the cycles always happen. The drops generally occur suddenly and swiftly while bottoms tend to take more time to reverse.

At extreme high valuations, there is always a careless and poorly informed crowd thinking they figured this “easy game” out. There is also always much margin debt.

When the first cracks occur, when the “buying the dips” strategy (!) stops working and the first big selling wave truly scares people, passive investments start being actively liquidated. Bids get hit, equities decline broadly, margin calls arrive, bids get hit again, and it all unravels indiscriminately, making the news headlines, fueling the panic…

…Until calm gradually returns, either because we see that we can trust our leaders, or because we approach absolute valuation lows.

But what lows?

Using the conventional P/E on trailing EPS, now at 14.8x (at 2440), lows have occurred around 15x, but also at 12x (20% lower), sometimes at 7x (53% lower).

image

If you still believe that equity investors are smart forward lookers, lows have been seen at 11-13x (now 14.1) forward EPS, but also at 10x, even 6x. Understand that these numbers are based on known, post facto, forward earnings. The current estimated forward earnings of $172.71 (per Refinitiv/IBES) is obviously useless given the environment.

image

By contrast, the Rule of 20 P/E (actual trailing P/E plus inflation), now 17.2x, tends to bottom between 16 and 18  with worst cases around 14.5x (15% lower).

image

In a “normal environment”, the current 17.2 R20 P/E would favor overweighting equities given an apparent worst case valuation downside of 15% (R20 P/E of 14.5) against a valuation upside of 16% to Fair Value (R20 of 20) and 28% to a R20 P/E of 22. The valuation risk/reward ratio is favorable.

However, this is no “normal environment”. We know that earnings will decline, perhaps significantly, during the next 6 months, at least, and that inflation, currently 2.4% on core CPI, will also decline, perhaps significantly, during the next 6 months, at least.

So, the current R20 Fair Value of 2900 (20.0 – 2.37 x $164.59) will certainly decline, perhaps significantly, during the next six months.

Since 1957, the R20 FV has declined more than 5% nine times, ranging from –6.7% in 2015-16 to –76.3% in 2007-08, with an average of 28.9% and a median of –23.5%.

The S&P 500 Index declined in 6 of these 9 periods, between –10.1% and –41.4%. It rose 17.1% in 1960-61 (before crashing 23% in early 1962), 4.5% in 1979-80 (before crashing 24% in 1981-82) and 3.1% in 2015-16 (dropping 8.9% in late 2015 before recovering).

Declining R20 Fair Values are like headwinds; they are rarely benign, generally tough and sometimes nasty. Undervaluation is no protection when the floor is dropping.

The LUV debate is on. Will this be a L, U or, as most people say (wish), a V shaped recovery?

Let’s try to objectively describe the environment:

  • A global pandemic has just started. No cure, no vaccine. The virus is still not completely understood.
  • China has been hit very hard. Its economy almost totally stalled. Restarting?
  • Europe has become the epicenter.
  • America is starting to feel the pain.
  • World economies are deeply suffering from a simultaneous crash in demand and supply.
  • China seems to have contained the spread. Will it come back during the restart, or next fall/winter before a vaccine is available?
  • Europe struggles with its usual leadership/unity problems. Poor Italy, Spain are closed. Will need bailout money. Here we go again, North vs South…
  • America: How bad will it get? Nobody really knows, but we know it will get worse in coming weeks (months?). Americans are truly scared. Will that (closures, social distancing, extreme hygiene, etc.) be enough to stop the exponentiality risk of the disease? Will it come back next season before a vaccine is available?
  • When will the world completely restart? This won’t magically go away until there is a widely available vaccine. What shape will we be in then?

Earnings will come down, brutally in Q2 and Q3. The LUV debate: I don’t want to vote now. The risk is that the left leg will prove deeper than expected.

The other risk is the crash in oil prices following MBS’s stupid tantrum. A large swath of the credit market is in shambles, at the most ridiculously worst moment.

The tide has receded, big time, and we’re about to find out who was swimming naked as Warren Buffett once said. But, in reality, we already know that most of the world is swimming naked, and central bankers know it. Hence their swift and radical reaction. More to come, no doubt about that. A global whatever it takes.

On the plus side of this gloomy ledger, lower oil prices substantially benefit consumers and corporate users, including the harshly impacted transportation and services sectors. And most governments are already taking strong fiscal measures.

Inflation will decline, helping everybody, helping support equity valuations, eventually, as long as it’s not deflation…

We know we will eventually recover. What we don’t know is when and from what level.

Alarmist? Yes. Voluntarily. This is no ordinary crisis like we are used to, when, at certain points, we see that we can trust our leaders and start visualizing the landing. Today, there are so many significant known and unknown unknowns. Too many,  with potentially very tough outcomes.

Will our leaders be strong enough, act in bipartisan manners, quickly and smartly?

I am not brave, and smart enough to figure it all out, just yet.

Be safe!

image

image

image

THE DAILY EDGE: 16 MARCH 2020

Stocks and Bond Yields Plummet After Fed Cut

Stocks globally plunged Monday even after the Federal Reserve slashed its benchmark interest rate to near zero as investors remained concerned that the emergency measures won’t suffice to ward off a recession caused by the coronavirus pandemic. (…)

“It’s basically using up all their ammunition within a three-week span,” said Mr. Wong. “There’s nothing left. They can’t use monetary loosening as part of their arsenal anymore.”

In addition to slashing borrowing costs, the Fed said it would buy $700 billion in Treasurys and mortgage-backed securities, cut the rate charged to banks for short-term emergency loans from its discount window and activate swap lines with five other central banks. (…)

Jerome Powell told reporters that plunging oil prices were a factor in the Fed’s decision. (…)

U.S. Policy Makers Weigh Next Stage of Stimulus U.S. policy makers are contemplating a significant fiscal stimulus to protect businesses and consumers from the economic disruptions caused by the coronavirus epidemic.

Lawmakers are seeking to achieve two goals: one is to help workers who miss paychecks and companies that lose business, such as restaurants and retailers. Another is to provide broad support for the economy to prevent or soften a recession.

Possibilities for the next round of government assistance include broad tax cuts, cash payments to households, targeted assistance and increased federal spending. Also on the table: suspension of student-loan payments, infrastructure projects and aid to state and local governments. (…)

President Trump on Friday criticized the bill that Democrats and his administration have been working on, a sign of how difficult a larger package might be. (…)

Mr. Mnuchin (…) urged corporations that have benefited from the Trump administration’s tax cuts to accept lower profits and keep workers on payrolls. (…)

Mr. Mnuchin also said he was particularly interested in assistance for the airline industry because of the importance of maintaining a domestic travel network. Such aid could be done by deferring tax payments or through other means, such as loan guarantees. Other affected industries—including hotels and cruise lines—could also be considered.

Those may prove controversial. In a letter to Mr. Trump earlier this week, Senate Democrats said they didn’t necessarily want to boost companies’ returns.

“Our focus should be on helping workers, including hourly workers and those workers at small or retail businesses who often don’t have access to short term savings or paid time off,” they wrote. (…)

…Senate Democrats thereby demonstrating their lack of understanding of how businesses are run. You need profits and reasonably sound balance sheets to run a lasting biz, hire and keep workers.

Germany wields ‘bazooka’ in fight against coronavirus Package expands loans to companies as EU warns of ‘major shock’ to economy
Bank of Canada Cuts Rates by Half Percentage Point Central bank says emergency cut is a proactive measure amid the coronavirus pandemic

The Bank of Canada issued an emergency half-percentage-point rate cut Friday, to 0.75%, saying the combination of the coronavirus pandemic and a plunge this week in energy prices will have “serious consequences” on the broader economy.

Bank of Canada Gov. Stephen Poloz unveiled the decision at a press conference in Ottawa featuring Finance Minister Bill Morneau and the head of Canada’s banking watchdog, Jeremy Rudin. The conference was designed as a show of strength, to show that the country’s most senior financial policymakers were prepared to act aggressively in unison to guard the economy from further damage.

‘We will do everything it takes to keep the economy strong,” Mr. Morneau said. (…)

Mr. Poloz reiterated Friday that the central bank was prepared to adjust rates further if required. Many economists now forecast another half percentage point cut, taking the benchmark rate to 0.25%. (…)

Mr. Morneau said he would next week reveal a significant package of fiscal measures to support the economy. In the meantime, he was establishing 10 billion Canadian dollars ($7.2 billion) in credit facilities to help small business who might face trouble obtaining credit.

Meanwhile, Mr. Rudin, the chief banking regulator, said he would reduce the amount of capital banks would have to set aside as a buffer, thereby freeing up about C$300 billion available to lend, effectively immediately. (…)

Bank of Japan to Double Stock Purchases to Blunt Virus Impact
Coronavirus Shutdowns Deliver a Punch to China’s Economic Gut Business activity in China turned broadly negative for the first time on record as home sales, construction activity, retail sales and factory output plunged, pushing unemployment to a record high

(…) Output at China’s factories slumped 13.5% in the combined January-February period from a year earlier, the statistics bureau said Monday. Retail sales slumped 20.5%. Fixed asset investment, a measure of construction, fell 24.5%, while real estate construction slid 44.9%. Home sales fell 34.7% and investment in the real-estate sector was off 16.3%. All of these figures were much worse than analysts forecast, and also represented a contraction after positive growth readings in the earlier comparable periods.

China’s record-high jobless rate, officially 5.7% for February [from 5.2% in December], is particularly concerning to Communist Party authorities whose political mandate includes improving the economic situation for its people. (…)

The figures for the first two months include almost a whole month of largely uninterrupted activity in January, before Wuhan was locked down on Jan. 23, two days before Lunar New Year. Mr. Mao, the bureau spokesman, said activity was normal until late January, indicating the bulk of the pullback occurred last month.

Biggest U.S. Banks Halt Buybacks to Free Up Capital for Coronavirus The pandemic ‘is an unprecedented challenge for the world and the global economy,’ the forum says

The biggest U.S. banks put share buybacks on hold Sunday and pledged to put their capital to use helping consumers and businesses struggling with the rapid economic slowdown caused by the novel coronavirus outbreak.

The Financial Services Forum, which represents the biggest U.S. lenders and custody banks, announced the decision to suspend buybacks after the Federal Reserve cut its benchmark interest rate to near zero and took steps to prevent market disruptions and keep money flowing through the financial system.

The novel coronavirus pandemic “is an unprecedented challenge for the world and the global economy,” the forum said. (…)

Oil Crash Is Bad News for Regional Banks That Went Big on Energy Lenders are bracing for loan losses and depressed earnings from an oil crash that is hammering the North American energy industry.
US investors brace for ratings downgrades About $300bn of bonds rated triple B trade with junk-like yields above 6 per cent
Most airlines face bankruptcy by end of May, industry body warns Carriers call for state support to avoid coronavirus ‘catastrophe’ as they slash capacity
Saudi Aramco Cuts Spending, Hikes Dividend Amid Price War

(…) The company’s net profit for 2019 fell 21% to 330.69 billion riyals ($88.11 billion), down from 416.52 billion riyals ($111 billion) a year earlier.

(…) it expects capital spending for 2020 to be between $25 billion and $30 billion, down from $32.8 billion a year earlier, due to market conditions and recent price volatility.

The decision to cut expenditures follows the company’s announcement last week that the Saudi government has ordered it to boost production capacity by 1 million barrels a day to 13 million barrels a day. Saudi Arabia has said an upgrade of this kind would typically cost $30 billion. Confused smile (…)

The price war has driven down shares in Aramco, which had remained relatively resilient in the face of the coronavirus’ damaging effect on oil demand.

“It’s an ideological move” on the part of Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman to cut prices, said a Saudi government adviser. (…)

The company’s shares have declined 8.3% from the IPO price of 33 riyals.

Senior staff and consultants at the company have purchased swaths of Aramco shares and many are concerned that the plans they have been asked to execute could cause them to lose money, according to current and former Saudi government advisers.

Over 5 million individuals, nearly all of them Saudis, bought into the IPO. Some middle-class Saudis invested their savings or took out loans to buy into the listing. For them, the sustained drop in share prices “could be a tragedy,” said a former Saudi government adviser. (…)

Coronavirus Will Change How We Shop, Travel and Work for Years

(…) On the supply side, international manufacturers are being forced to rethink where to buy and produce their goods — accelerating a shift after the U.S.-China trade war exposed the risks of relying on one source for components.

In the white-collar world, workplaces have amped up options for teleworking and staggered shifts — ushering in a new era where work from home is an increasing part of people’s regular schedule.

“Once effective work-from-home policies are established, they are likely to stick,” said Karen Harris, managing director of consultancy Bain’s Macro Trends Group in New York. (…)

In China, where the virus first erupted in Wuhan late last year, the top legislature has already imposed a total ban on trade and consumption of wild animals amid scientists’ warnings that the deadly coronavirus migrated from animals to humans. Additional strict hygiene rules are expected that will accelerate a push by wary consumers to online shopping, similar to how the 2003 SARS outbreak changed shopping habits as people avoided the mall. (…)

Governments may spend much more on health care to avoid the massive cost associated with epidemics, according to a new paper on the macroeconomic impact of the virus published by the Brookings Institution and co-authored by Warwick McKibbin and Roshen Fernando of the Australia National University. (…)

“Long brewing debates about how to revamp the U.S. health care system might benefit from a renewed sense of urgency, enabling structural change.” (…)