Coronavirus’s Global Spread May Not Be Contained, WHO Says The number of new coronavirus cases in China is declining, but it isn’t yet clear whether the outbreak can be stopped from spreading globally, the World Health Organization said.
(…) “I don’t think it can be contained at this point,” said Tom Inglesby, director of the Center for Health Security at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. The virus is spreading in communities in multiple countries, he said. (…)
“We are encouraged by the continued decline in [new] cases in China,” Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the WHO’s director-general, said at the news conference. “The key message that should give all countries hope, courage and confidence is that this virus can be contained.” (…)
Still, Dr. Tedros said, the new coronavirus “absolutely” has the power to become a pandemic. He said the growing number of cases in Italy, Iran and South Korea is “deeply concerning” and urged other countries to prepare for outbreaks.
Yet many countries may not be ready to identify symptoms that can easily be mistaken for the flu, the WHO and infectious-disease experts said. Tests for the virus aren’t in widespread use, even in countries with advanced public health systems like the U.S. Hospitals may not be able to handle an influx of critically ill patients, particularly in the middle of flu season.
“We believe that all countries are vulnerable,” said Dr. Ryan. All nations have older people who are at higher risk for severe illness from the virus, he said. (…)
-
The Atlantic: You’re Likely to Get the Coronavirus
(…) The Harvard epidemiology professor Marc Lipsitch is exacting in his diction, even for an epidemiologist. Twice in our conversation he started to say something, then paused and said, “Actually, let me start again.” So it’s striking when one of the points he wanted to get exactly right was this: “I think the likely outcome is that it will ultimately not be containable.” (…)
Testing people who are already extremely sick is an imperfect strategy if people can spread the virus without even feeling bad enough to stay home from work.
Lipsitch predicts that, within the coming year, some 40 to 70 percent of people around the world will be infected with the virus that causes COVID-19. But, he clarifies emphatically, this does not mean that all will have severe illnesses. “It’s likely that many will have mild disease, or may be asymptomatic,” he said. (…)
The emerging consensus among epidemiologists is that the most likely outcome of this outbreak is a new seasonal disease—a fifth “endemic” coronavirus. With the other four, people are not known to develop long-lasting immunity. If this one follows suit, and if the disease continues to be as severe as it is now, “cold and flu season” could become “cold and flu and COVID-19 season.” (…)
Lipsitch’s “very, very rough” estimate when we spoke a week ago (banking on “multiple assumptions piled on top of each other,” he said) was that 100 or 200 people in the U.S. were infected. That’s all it would take to seed the disease widely. The rate of spread would depend on how contagious the disease is in milder cases. On Friday, Chinese scientists reported in the medical journal JAMA an apparent case of asymptomatic spread of the virus, from a patient with a normal chest CT scan. The researchers concluded with stolid understatement that if this finding is not a bizarre abnormality, “the prevention of COVID-19 infection would prove challenging.” (…)
Overall, if all pieces fell into place, Hatchett guesses it would be 12 to 18 months before an initial product could be deemed safe and effective. That timeline represents “a vast acceleration compared with the history of vaccine development,” he told me. But it’s also unprecedentedly ambitious. “Even to propose such a timeline at this point must be regarded as hugely aspirational,” he added. (…)
“If we’re putting all our hopes in a vaccine as being the answer, we’re in trouble,” Jason Schwartz, an assistant professor at Yale School of Public Health who studies vaccine policy, told me. The best-case scenario, as Schwartz sees it, is the one in which this vaccine development happens far too late to make a difference for the current outbreak. (…)
Fear of Coronavirus, Rather Than Virus Itself, Hits Economies Estimates of the epidemic’s impact on the global economy are largely educated guesses
(…) Estimates of the disease’s economic impact are largely educated guesses.
Goldman Sachs, for example, projects a 0.8 percentage point hit to U.S. annualized growth in the current quarter from reduced tourism, exports and supply chain disruptions, with most of that reversed by year-end. But “risks…are skewed towards a larger hit because a change in the news flow could lead to increased risk aversion—less travel, commuting or shopping.”
Peter Berezin, chief global strategist at BCA Research, an investment advisory, estimated global growth would fall to zero in the current quarter and then rebound, for a full-year hit of about half a percentage point. But he also sketched out a more pessimistic scenario.
If the virus infected a billion people, as the swine flu did in 2009 and 2010, 20 million could die, he said. “Demand for most items other than necessities would seize up.” The resulting recession would be as deep as 2008-09, though recovery would be much faster, he predicted. (…)
Chicago Fed National Activity Index Suggests Improved Growth
The Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago indicated that its National Activity Index (CFNAI) rose to -0.25 during January from -0.51 in December. The three-month moving average of the index gained to -0.09, the highest level since August. It was improved from the low of -0.52 in April. During the last 20 years, there has been a 70% correlation between the index and the q/q change in real GDP.
The CFNAI is a weighted average of 85 monthly indicators of national economic activity. It is constructed to have an average value of zero and a standard deviation of one. Since economic activity tends toward trend growth rate over time, a positive index reading corresponds to growth above trend and a negative index reading corresponds to growth below trend.
The rise in the overall index last month was due to gains in each of the index components. (…)
But GDP growth remains below trend as this Advisor Perspectives chart shows:

China’s main manufacturing hubs reboot after virus shutdown As many parts of China ease coronavirus travel curbs, main manufacturing hubs in the east and south are seeing hundreds of thousands of migrant workers returning to work and more traffic on the roads during rush hours.
(…) Several provinces have lowered their coronavirus emergency response measures, allowing more flexibility on transportation and helping firms resume production.
About 180 million workers have left their hometowns to return to work since Feb 10, when China ended the prolonged Lunar New Year holiday due to the virus outbreak, according to Reuters calculations based on transportation ministry data.
At the current daily travel flow rate of more than 14 million people, about 192 million people are likely to return to cities where they work during the last two weeks in February, beating a government projection of 120 million.
Data compiled by China’s internet giant Baidu Inc (BIDU.O) shows that Guangdong province, an economic and export powerhouse in the south, and Zhejiang province, a major manufacturing hub for textile and machines in the east, are seeing significantly more inflows of migrant workers since last week.
Guangdong government said it has sent nearly 200 chartered trains in the past two weeks to bring more than 6,000 migrant workers back from their inland hometowns. (…)
Shenzhen, headquarters of Huawei and known as China’s Silicon Valley, has seen migrant flows picking up to the highest level after the Lunar New Year holiday, although it is still well below travel flows during peak days last year.
Urban transport in Shenzhen also shows a sharp rise this week. According to Shenzhen traffic police data, 420,900 cars were tracked on roads during morning peak hours on Monday, up 58% compared to the same period last week.
That remains 40% less traffic than a normal Monday before the coronavirus outbreak, as Chinese authorities are still encouraging employees to work remotely to reduce the risk of virus spread.
Location technology firm TOMTOM’s traffic index also shows a climb in congestion levels in Shenzhen and other major cities, including the capital Beijing and financial center Shanghai, this week.
Guangdong province added 30,000 firms to its business resumption list last week, compared to only 12,000 firms the week before.
Even as companies return to work, production levels remain behind what they would normally be due to supply chain disruptions, curbed demand, and spotty labor shortages. (…)
Daily coal consumption at six major coal-fired power groups across China rose to 427,000 tonnes on Monday, the highest level for nearly a month, but still 34% lower than the same period last year. (…)
-
China charters flights to get people back to work
-
Blue skies return to China as coronavirus cuts coal consumption
February air pollution readings drop to 6-year low in many cities (Thanks Mark)
View of Shanghai, Feb. 22. (Photo by Yusho Cho)
BDO MANUFACTURING CFO OUTLOOK SURVEY
Note: this survey was taken before the COVID-19 erupted.
(…) Survey respondents cite trade policy stability as the most critical factor to the overall health of the U.S. manufacturing industry. (…)
Since the start of the trade war, the United States has imposed tariffs on more than $375 billion worth of imports from China. Another wave of tariffs on $7.5 billion worth of European Union goods went into effect in October 2019, targeting cheese, wine, whiskey and aircraft products, among other goods. Tariffs on EU auto imports are currently under consideration. Even Mexico was temporarily subjected to a 17.5% tariff on tomato imports before a deal was struck. But tariffs are only one tool in the Trump administration’s trade arsenal: Over the last three years, the administration added more than 3,100 individuals and entities to the Treasury Department’s sanctions list. Other foreign-made goods have been subject to export controls.
While the intention of these “America First” trade policies is to “level the playing field” for American manufacturers, the industry itself is largely opposed to the protectionist measures that have actually been implemented. Unhindered global trade ultimately benefits manufacturers, who have long supported policy agendas that break down trade barriers rather than build them.
Many U.S. manufacturers rely on more affordable imports from overseas to make their products. The imposition of tariffs and sanctions has resulted in significant supply chain disruptions. In fact, more than one-in-five (21%) manufacturers experienced a disruption to their supply chain as a result of government restrictions in the last 12 months.
China is also the third-largest—and fastest growing—market for U.S. goods exports. For its part, China has imposed $110 billion of retaliatory tariffs on U.S. exports. Escalating trade tensions between the two nations have had a marked negative impact on growth in exports to China, both in terms of volume and value.
The trade war with China and other major trading partners has certainly been an impetus for executives to rethink their global supply chains. However, rising labor costs, political instability and a greater focus on transparency, among other trends, mean supply chains will be under review regardless of the outcome of trade negotiations. While cost control is the predominant consideration and challenge in optimizing the supply chain, other factors, such as speed, resilience and quality control, also come into play.
Strategic sourcing is one lever manufacturers can pull to reduce procurement costs and mitigate tax and tariff impacts—though it’s worth noting that roughly a third (33%) of manufacturers still view Asia as the most stable location outside the U.S. for sourcing products in the long-term.
Manufacturers also need to realign their supply chain strategies to account for shifts in customer demand as well as demographics. When facing off against larger competitors who provide next-day or even same-day delivery, supply chain efficiency may need to take precedence over cutting costs. Manufacturers with global operations, for example, see greater customer demand for faster delivery than they do lower costs. (…)
Slumping tourism will cost Asia up to $115bn this year Holidays in Hell: The impact of the Covid-19 virus on economies in Asia is potentially huge, as tourism in the region takes a beating.
Luxury goods makers brace for €40bn hit from outbreak
TECHNICALS WATCH
Lowry’s Research notes yesterday’s heavy and widespread selling but says that it was “little different from similar sharp drops in the early stages of prior market corrections” and that such down day “rarely represents the exhausted Supply historically found around important market bottoms.” Nonetheless, Lowry’s considers that “the probabilities are that the current market drop represents only an interruption in an ongoing bull market.”
SentimenTrader notes that “Monday was the first session in nearly 6 months when more than 90% of the volume on the NYSE flowed into stocks that declined on the day. Streaks have gone on much (!) longer but this is still one of the longer ones since 1962. (…) this kind of action typically led to even more selling pressure in the weeks ahead. Risk was high relative to reward even up to three months later.”
ST goes on listing the number of recent technical warnings, many pointed out in the Daily Edge, including the Hindenburg Omen triggered again on Friday and yesterday’s Titanic Syndrome.
If we can get past the silly names, and focus on what they’re saying, it’s worth noting since they’re designed to highlight periods when there is heavy turmoil underlying the mask of the indexes.
Over the past month, there has now been a combined 13 warnings on both exchanges.
What we know:
- World economies and corporate supply chains were severely hit by the US-China trade war. That pain continues after the so-called truce and is now being seriously aggravated by COVID-19.
What we don’t know:
- How long it will last, how painful it will be on economies and supply chains and profits.
The probabilities are thus tilted to the darker side until proven otherwise, especially with equities still overvalued. That last part, we know.
Basic technicals show the 100-day moving average at 3157 and the 200-dma at 3040 where, based on current trailing EPS, the Rule of 20 P/E would be 20.7 and the regular P/E 18.5.
FYI, Bain& Co’s annual:




