The enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it’s the illusion of knowledge (Stephen Hawking)

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so (Mark Twain)

Invest with smart knowledge and objective odds

THE DAILY EDGE: 19 FEBRUARY 2020

Cass Transportation Index Report January 2020

The turn of the calendar didn’t leave the bad news in 2019, as the Cass Freight Index showed continued weakness in the U.S. freight market. Both the shipments and expenditures components of the Cass Freight Index worsened sequentially and showed decelerating y/y growth. According to the broader stock market levels, there is still optimism out there, but the freight trends have yet to turn. And the Covid-19 coronavirus case count continues to grow, creating uncertainty around containment and eventual impact on global supply chains. Some Chinese factories resumed operation this past week, but they are still not close to 100% production levels. Others have pushed re-opening back to March 1.

As stated last month, we expect 2Q20 to have the best chance of showing actual y/y growth in domestic U.S. shipments and freight costs, if traditional seasonal freight patterns hold, because 2Q19 was below average in terms of the seasonal surge in activity. Plus, depending on how the aforementioned coronavirus affects supply chains, there could be a 2Q20 wave of import activity (and therefore truck and intermodal) when the Chinese export machine starts churning again.

Shipment volumes dropped 9.4% in January vs 2019 levels (Chart 1), as the index posted its lowest absolute reading in roughly three years. It was also the steepest y/y decline since 2009. This follows a sluggish end to 2019, where many blamed last month’s weakness on timing of the holidays. There could have been a residual impact post-New Years, but with the negative y/y and sequential decline, and the deceleration in the y/y growth rate, we don’t see much good news in this volume number.

Worst y/y growth in shipment volumes since late 200

Chart 1 Jan 2020

Even before the coronavirus issues have any impact on the U.S. transportation market, the freight market is weak, partially due to elevated inventories (although the inventory situation has at least stabilized and is likely improving). On 4Q19 earnings calls, we heard manufacturers and distributors say inventories look like they’re returning to normal levels, but the optimism for 2020 was only modest. Orders are still soft, and the most positive commentary was around the consumer and residential construction.

Chart 2 Jan 2020
Empire State Manufacturing Conditions Strengthen

The Empire State Manufacturing Index of General Business Conditions increased to a nine-month high of 12.9 during February, extending modest gains during the prior two months. A reading of 5.0 had been expected in the Action Economics Forecast Survey. Thirty-four percent of survey respondent reported improved business conditions while 21 percent reported a decline.

The ISM-Adjusted Index, constructed by Haver Analytics, surged to 56.9, the highest level since June 2018. During the last 20 years, there has been 59% correlation between the level of the index and q/q change in real GDP.

Leading this month’s improvement was the new orders index as it surged to 22.1, the highest level since September 2017. The shipments series also jumped roughly ten points. The delivery times returned to positive territory, indicating slower delivery speeds. The inventories index surged to a two-year high while the unfilled orders index turned positive after falling for roughly one year.

Working lower was the employment series to 6.6, its lowest level in six months. Nineteen percent of survey respondents reported increased hiring while nine percent reported a decline. During the last 20 years, there has been a 73% correlation between the index level and the m/m change in factory sector payrolls. The average workweek reading also turned negative. (…)

image

Virus Update

China death toll tops 2,000, global confirmed cases exceed 75,000. (…)

A growing number of China’s private companies have cut wages, delayed paychecks or stopped paying staff completely, saying that the economic toll of the coronavirus has left them unable to cover their labor costs. To slow the spread of the virus, Chinese authorities and big employers have encouraged people to stay home. Shopping malls and restaurants are empty; amusement parks and theaters are closed; non-essential travel is all but forbidden. (…)

A Tax-Cut Idea for Trump By Stephen Moore and Adam Michel

The White House is expected to announce details of its tax cuts for the Trump second term. One idea on the table is to create tax-free investment accounts for lower- and middle-income families.

The plan we’ve suggested to the president would allow families to put up to $10,000 a year tax-free into a savings fund. Ideally, the money would be invested in a stock index fund. The goals would be to increase woefully low private household savings, to make Americans more financially stable, and to reduce dependence on government entitlements. (…)

These new accounts would expand ownership of stock to millions of Americans, thus democratizing the market and sharing the gains, while minimizing risk by investing in a diverse portfolio. This may be the most effective way to reduce wealth inequality.

These accounts would be voluntary, and employers would be encouraged to match contributions. Funds could be used after five years for home purchase or improvement, emergency medical expenses, starting a new business, private-school or college tuition, supplementing income after a job loss, or retirement. (…)

Mixed Signals for Chip-Making Gear The specter of export controls hangs over the sector despite President Trump’s backpedal.

The Wall Street Journal reported on Monday that the U.S. Commerce Department was drafting new rules that could restrict semiconductor manufacturers from producing chips for Huawei using equipment from U.S. companies. The changes would require such companies to get a license from the government if they intend to continue producing components for Huawei on American-made gear. Because Huawei is one of the largest chip buyers on the market and purchases them from nearly every major producer, such a rule could have “wide-ranging supply impacts to the semiconductor and consumer markets,” wrote Atif Malik of Citigroup in a note to clients.

It therefore didn’t take long for the backpedal to emerge: In a set of tweets Tuesday morning, President Trump declared that the U.S. “cannot, & will not, become such a difficult place to deal with in terms of foreign countries buying our product, including for the always used National Security excuse, that our companies will be forced to leave in order to remain competitive.” (…)

Chinese Trade Spat Isn’t About Soybeans

(…) The Wall Street Journal reported Sunday that the Trump administration could stop CFM International, a joint venture of General Electric and France’s Safran, from selling more engines to China’s Comac. The engines are used in the flagship C919 jet, and the U.S. fears that they could be reverse engineered. (…)

Unfortunately for investors, the real trade conflict has much more to do with Huawei and CFM than it does with how many soybeans China buys.

The C919 is a central piece of the “Made in China 2025” initiative. Airbus and Boeing don’t appear too worried because the jet is still a generation behind their own A320neo and 737 MAX aircraft, respectively. But the Chinese state owns aircraft maker Comac and can pour a lot more resources into it. It also owns the main domestic airlines, so it can ensure orders. Commitments for the C919 already top 1,000. (…)

Canada: Adding fuel to the housing market

The Minister of Finance, Bill Morneau, announced today a change in the qualifying rate for insured mortgages in Canada (buyers with a downpayment less than 20%). Recall that since October 2016, the federal government requires homebuyers to qualify at the higher 5-year posted rate instead of the contractual rate, a measure put in place to curb household debt. In the current context, this represents a 22% reduction in purchasing power.

Starting in April 2020, the new benchmark rate for homebuyers will be “the weekly median 5-year fixed insured mortgage rate from mortgage insurance applications, plus 2%”, which will be more representative of market conditions as opposed to the more static posted rate. What does this mean for homebuyers looking for an insured mortgage? Given that the new benchmark rate is lower than the posted rate, the maximum amount that can be borrowed increases by 4% according to the latest data available. This should add further fuel to a vigorous housing market which is already supported by the recent decline in mortgage rates and a vibrant labour market. (NBF)

image

The ECB is considering including owner-occupied housing in the consumer inflation calculations.

Source: The Economist; Read full article (The Daily Shot)

  • Here is the potential impact on the CPI.
Source: Pantheon Macroeconomics
Outside of the big 5 tech companies, earnings growth is zero

CH 20200218_faamg_eps_growth.png

As discussed last week, there is a clear split between cyclicals and non-cyclicals in Q4 (chart from Refinitiv/IBES)

image

GS adds that a lower-than-expected effective tax rate (17% vs. 20%) helped Q4 earnings, assuming one has taxable income.

Mega-cap earnings strength contrasts with small-cap earnings weakness. The Russell 2000 experienced a 7% earnings decline during the fourth quarter, as many smaller firms posted weak top-line growth and had difficulty absorbing rising wages and other input costs.

Meanwhile, in Europe, we now have 156 (48%) of the STOXX 600 index reported. The beat rate is 51% and the miss rate 41%

  • Fourth quarter earnings are expected to decrease 0.2% from Q4 2018. It was +5.5% in November. Excluding the Energy sector, earnings are expected to increase 1.3%.
  • Fourth quarter revenue is expected to increase 1.4% from Q4 2018. Excluding the Energy sector, revenues are expected to increase 3.2%.

THE DAILY EDGE: 18 FEBRUARY 2020

U.S. Retail Sales Rise Steadily

Total retail sales including food service establishments increased 0.3% (4.4% y/y) during January following a 0.2% December gain, revised from 0.3%. The increase matched expectations in the Action Economics Forecast Survey. Retail sales excluding motor vehicles & parts also rose an expected 0.3% (4.0% y/y) last month after a 0.6% increase in December, revised from 0.7%.

Retail sales alone edged 0.1% higher (4.0% y/y) following no change last month, which was revised from 0.4%. A 3.1% decline (0.0% y/y) in apparel store sales weakened the result as it followed December’s 2.7% jump. A 2.1% (-1.3% y/y) rise in building materials store sales offset most of this weakening. Motor vehicles purchases improved 0.2% (5.7% y/y) as unit sales of light vehicles (reported earlier this month) rose 1.1%. Nonstore retail sales increased 0.3% (8.4% y/y) after four straight months of decline. (…)

Restaurant sales increased 1.2% (7.4% y/y), the same as in December, which was revised from 0.2%.

image

Generally good numbers except for “control sales” that feeds right into the personal consumption segment of GDP (excludes autos, gas & building materials): they were unchanged in January (consensus +0.3%) but there was a significant revision to December to +0.2% from +0.5% and to November from –0.1 to –0.2.

These revisions, particularly December’s, radically change the retail trade picture to a rather slow growth sector starting in August: +0.2%, -0.3%, -0.0%, -0.2%, +0.25%, +0.0%. Total last 6 months: –0.11% vs booming sales since September 2018.

image

On a YoY basis, control sales are still up 4.4% in January but even if monthly growth was 0.2% from now, August 2020 sales would merely be up 2.0% YoY, in line with core inflation.

In effect, the revised data suggest that consumer spending was weaker than what the initial Q4 GDP released showed and that the “hand off” to Q1’20 is rather weak.

So, beware of headlines such as Haver Analytics’ “U.S. Retail Sales Rise Steadily” or the WSJ’s “U.S. Consumer Spending Picks Up”. We should all hope they will use the same headlines in coming months.

Here’s the trend in real Retail and Food Services Sales: actually down from August level.

fredgraph (61)

Retailers are facing very tough comparisons from a year ago, when consumer spending was robust and the sector posted strong same store sales (SSS) in Q4 2018. The Refinitiv SSS index is expected to see 2.4% growth in Q4 2019. A 3.0% SSS reflects healthy consumer spending. The 2.4% SSS estimate is below the 4.1% result seen in Q4 2018. (Refinitiv)

Refinitiv Same Store Sales Index: 2017 – Present

The Earnings Watch section below has more on retailing.

BTW, from Bespoke:

737 MAX and Utilities Push U.S. Industrial Production Lower

Industrial production decreased 0.3% in January (-0.8% year-on-year) following offsetting revisions to November and December — now +0.9% and -0.4% revised from +0.8% and -0.3% respectively. The Action Economics Survey forecast a 0.3% decline in January.

Manufacturing activity edged down 0.1% (-0.8% y/y) during January, with a slight downward revision to December (now 0.1% versus 0.2%). Utilities production fell 4.0% (-6.2% y/y), as much warmer-than-normal weather in January decreased demand. U.S. population-weighted heating was 176 degree-days below normal. The only warmer January by this measure occurred in 2006. Meanwhile mining activity rose 1.2% (3.1% y/y).

Manufacturing of durable goods declined 0.5% (-0.8% y/y) in January, with aircraft production plunging 10.7% (-10.2% y/y). This 737 MAX production-halt-related drop is the largest non-strike driven decline in aircraft output. (…)

Output of business equipment, an indicator of capital spending, fell 2.6% in January (-4.5% y/y). In the special aggregate groupings, production of high technology products, which is now less than 2% of total output, increased 0.8% (8.9% y/y). Factory sector production excluding the motor vehicle and high tech sectors decreased 0.3% (-1.1% y/y), and remains 11% below its 2007 peak.

image

U.S. Core CPI and JOLTS Job Openings

Another interesting correlation with slumping job openings (BCA Research).

U.S. Core CPI and JOLTS Job Openings
Japan’s Economy Shrinks 6% as Sales-Tax Rise Cools Consumption In Germany, central bank said it sees no sign of improvement in the first-quarter growth outlook

Japan, the world’s third-largest economy after the U.S. and China contracted at an annualized rate of 6.3% in the October-December quarter, worse than economists’ forecast of a 3.9% contraction. The biggest reason was a sharp drop in private consumption after the national sales tax rose to 10% on Oct. 1 from 8%.

“Because of the effects of the novel coronavirus, weakness in consumption will likely continue in the January-March period. Exports and production could be dreadfully weak as the supply chain is interrupted,” said Daiwa Securities economist Mari Iwashita. (..)

Chinese accounted for about 37% of the $44 billion in spending by tourists in Japan last year. (…)

The Bundesbank said a temporary decline in China’s economy is likely to damp German exports. “In addition, some global value chains could be affected by the security measures taken. Delivery bottlenecks in individual industries in Germany would be the result,” it said.

The Bundesbank called on the government to spend its large surplus to provide a boost, a shift for an economically conservative institution that had until recently pushed back against international demands that Germany loosen its purse strings. (…)

Singapore said Monday it was downgrading its growth forecast for 2020 to a 0.5% contraction to 1.5% growth because of the coronavirus outbreak, which has led to a sharp decline in tourist arrivals. In November, before the outbreak, the city-state’s government had projected growth of 0.5% to 2.5%. Singapore’s Ministry of Trade and Industry said China’s slowdown would have an impact across Southeast Asia due to supply-chain disruptions and reduced Chinese import demand.

Malaysian officials said Friday that the government would announce a stimulus package later this month to assist businesses. (…)

China’s Shipping Nears a Standstill Amid Coronavirus Disruption Executives say large container ships are leaving Chinese ports as little as 10% full, and sailings are being canceled as carriers brace for a financial retreat

(…) Mr. Jensen said the canceled trips, which have topped 50 since late January, will delay or reduce shipments into the U.S., where retailers may see a slowdown in their traditional restocking of inventories for the spring.

Five European and Asian container ship operators told the Journal they are preparing profit warnings for the first half or the full year. (…)

Sea-Intelligence said in a report this week that more than 350,000 containers have been removed from global trade since the outbreak of the virus (…)

A group representing U.S. agriculture exporters warned its members this week to ensure that ocean carriers can store their goods on arrival in China, particularly items like meat, vegetables and fruit that require refrigeration. American exporters are seeing cargo backed up even at U.S. hubs because of the congestion in China’s distribution networks.

Brokers said crude and natural gas shipments are down by nearly half across China’s main ports. Daily freight rates for big crude tankers have fallen to between $10,000 and $40,000, from up to $80,000 at the start of the year. (…)

The China Association of the National Shipbuilding Industry said more than 200 deliveries of ships under repairs or retrofitting could be pushed back. China is the world’s biggest shipbuilder, with more than 960 vessels set to be delivered this year, according to data provider VesselsValue. (…)

Infection Cases Top 73,000: Virus Update The WHO has said it’s too early to say if infections are truly declining.
  • China death toll 1,868; mainland cases rise to 72,436
  • Hubei reports 1,807 new cases; 93 more deaths
EARNINGS WATCH

From Refinitiv/IBES:

Through Feb. 14, 387 companies in the S&P 500 Index have reported earnings for Q4 2019. Of these companies, 71.6% reported earnings above analyst expectations and 18.9% reported earnings below analyst expectations. In a typical quarter (since 1994), 65% of companies beat estimates and 20% miss estimates. Over the past four quarters, 74% of companies beat the estimates and 19% missed estimates.

In aggregate, companies are reporting earnings that are 5.2% above estimates, which compares to a long-term (since 1994) average surprise factor of 3.3% and the average surprise factor over the prior four quarters of 4.9%.

Of these companies, 65.5% reported revenue above analyst expectations and 34.5% reported revenue below analyst expectations. In a typical quarter (since 2002), 60% of companies beat estimates and 40% miss estimates. Over the past four quarters, 58% of companies beat the estimates and 42% missed estimates.

In aggregate, companies are reporting revenue that are 1.1% above estimates, which compares to a long-term (since 2002) average surprise factor of 1.5% and the average surprise factor over the prior four quarters of 1.0%.

The estimated earnings growth rate for the S&P 500 for 19Q4 is 2.6% [+2.3% last week]. If the energy sector is excluded, the growth rateimproves to 5.5% [+5.1%]. The estimated revenue growth rate for the S&P 500 for 19Q4 is 5.1% [+5.0%]. If the energy sector is excluded, the growth rate improves to 6.4% [+6.2%].

Overall a pretty good earnings season with no signs of weakening, so far. Guidance for Q1’20 is also quite upbeat. Fifteen more companies than usual have pre-announced Q1 so far and virtually all of them were positive. But the virus is still doing its damage…

image

And analysts keep revising down:

image

image

The estimated earnings growth rate for the S&P 500 for 20Q1 is 3.8% (+4.0% last week and +6.3% on Jan. 1). If the energy sector is excluded, the growth rate
declines to 3.6% (+3.7%).

Trailing EPS are now $164.54, finally resuming a slight upward trend interrupted last June. The current overvaluation can only correct in one of two ways: either the market corrects towards its R20 equilibrium or the R20 Fair Value (yellow line) spikes back up to close the current 15% overvaluation. This latter event happened in 2017-18 thanks to the tax reform, but not preventing the late 2018 10% overvaluation to get nastily corrected by Dec. 24. Forward looking earnings are virus-vulnerable…

image

Retailing:

Retailers are getting ready to report Q4 earnings and have been actively discussing the coronavirus issue over the past two weeks. To date, there have been nine negative EPS pre-announcements for Q1 2020 compared to three positive preannouncements.

Likewise, when looking at revenue, there are more negative than positive pre-announcements. About 30% of this negative guidance is coming from footwear, including Nike, which said last week that in the short term, they expect the situation to have a material impact on its operations in greater China. (Refinitiv)

Exhibit 2: The Refinitiv Retail Earnings/Revenue Guidance – Q4 2019 and Q1 2020

  • Apple Warns Virus Will Hurt Sales Apple became the first major U.S. company to say it won’t meet its revenue projections for the current quarter due to the coronavirus outbreak, which it said had limited iPhone production and curtailed demand in China.

Apple said its contract manufacturers were ramping up production “more slowly than we had anticipated.” As a result, it said that there would be iPhone supply shortages that temporarily affect world-wide sales. It also said the closure of its own stores and many partner stores across China had affected sales of its products. (…)

The company said that outside of China demand for its products and services had been strong and in line with expectations. (…)

Foxconn is aiming to resume 50% of mainland China production by the end of February, and 80% in mid-March, another person familiar with the matter said. (…)

(…) Volkswagen AG said Monday it would postpone production restarts at some Chinese plants for another week. Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV said last week it temporarily halted production in Serbia because it couldn’t get parts from China, which continues to deal with manufacturing delays as it seeks to contain the spread of the virus. (…)

Walmart misses on fourth-quarter earnings as guidance shy of forecast

Walmart said its fiscal fourth-quarter ending Jan. 31 net income rose 12% to $4.14 billion, or $1.45 a share, as revenue rose 2.1% to $141.67 billion and U.S. comparable-store sales rose 1.9%. Excluding items including unrest in Chile, Walmart said it would’ve earned $1.38 a share. Analysts polled by FactSet expected earnings of $1.44 on revenue of $142.5 billion. For fiscal 2021, it expects adjusted EPS between $5 and $5.15, sales growth of 3% at constant currencies, and Walmart U.S. comparable store sales growth of 2.5%. Analysts expected earnings of $5.21 for the fiscal 2021 year. (…)

TECHNICALS WATCH

Lowry’s Research notes a number of indicators that, over the past 2 weeks, “showed a small degree of potential underlying weakness.” It cites primarily the increasing narrowness of the equity market, “the steep outperformance of Large Cap stocks, and specifically Tech stocks that dominate capitalization-weighted indexes such as the S&P 500 and NASDAQ-100. (…) [However], “without significant increases in Selling Pressure, and further deterioration in breadth and intensity, any correction is likely to be short-lived and provide further opportunities for deploying new money.”

It may be appropriate to recall some of Bob Farrell’s time-tested Ten Rules:

  • 1. Markets tend to return to the mean over time
  • 2. Excesses in one direction will lead to an opposite excess in the other direction
  • 3. There are no new eras — excesses are never permanent
  • 4. Exponential rapidly rising or falling markets usually go further than you think, but they do not correct by going sideways
  • 7. Markets are strongest when they are broad and weakest when they narrow to a handful of blue-chip names

Smaller cap stocks continue to lag. These RBC Capital charts are self-explanatory. It sure seems like the tax reform and the trade war have disproportionately benefitted large companies.

image

HSBC Plans to Cut 35,000 Jobs, $100 Billion of Assets Europe’s biggest bank said it plans to scale back its operations in the U.S. and mainland Europe, as well as its investment bank, as it reported a sharp fall in net profit
U.S. to Raise Tariffs on EU Aircraft The Trump administration said it would increase tariffs on aircraft coming from the European Union, as its dispute with the bloc over subsidies for plane manufacturers remains unresolved.

Beginning March 18, airplanes from France, Germany, Spain and the U.K. will be subject to 15% tariffs, up from a 10% tariff that took effect in October.

The U.S. initially was authorized to impose the tariffs by a ruling at the World Trade Organization following a 15-year legal battle with the EU over support programs for aircraft manufacturers Airbus SE and its U.S. rival, Boeing Co.

As part of the dispute, the U.S. trade representative also imposed tariffs in October on a range of EU food products, including certain wines, cheeses and olives. Those tariffs were set in October at 25% and weren’t raised on Friday. The USTR has said about $7.5 billion worth of goods are affected by the tariffs, a figure which was unchanged by the latest action. (…)

The WTO decision allowed tariffs as high as 100% to be imposed. The USTR’s office had threatened a wide range of products from Europe with the maximum tariff, prompting an outcry from industries that could be affected. But the USTR opted on Friday for a more modest increase in aircraft tariffs and no change to others.

“The United States remains open to a negotiated settlement that addresses current and future subsidies to Airbus provided by the EU and certain current and former member States,” the USTR said in a statement. (…)

The WTO is expected to rule later this year on a related case brought by the EU against U.S. subsidies of Boeing. At that point, the EU will be authorized to strike back with tariffs of its own. The USTR said Friday it may still change its tariffs “immediately upon any EU imposition of additional duties on U.S. products” as part of the dispute.