The enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it’s the illusion of knowledge (Stephen Hawking)

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so (Mark Twain)

Invest with smart knowledge and objective odds

THE DAILY EDGE: 18 JUNE 2019: Trade War, Rates War, Currency War!

ECB Signals Possible Rate Cut, Bond-Buying Extension European Central Bank President Mario Draghi signaled that the bank could cut interest rates or expand its giant bond-buying program as soon as its next policy meeting in July, sending stocks higher and the euro lower against the dollar.

The comments, delivered at the ECB’s annual research conference outside Portugal’s capital, represent a clear statement of intent from Mr. Draghi, who is wrestling with the fallout from international trade tensions on Europe’s critical manufacturing sector and stubbornly low inflation.

In a sign of the headwinds Europe faces, exports from the eurozone to the rest of the world fell 2.5% in April compared to March, according to the European Union’s statistics agency Tuesday. Meanwhile, Germany’s ZEW index, a gauge of sentiment in the financial markets, fell by 19 points to minus 21.1 in June. (…)

A slew of central banks in the Asia-Pacific region, including New Zealand and Australia, have already reduced interest rates in recent weeks. The Federal Reserve could signal on Wednesday that it is preparing to cut short-term interest rates, with bond markets pricing in two rate cuts this year.

The ECB is in a trickier position because its key interest rate is minus 0.4%, almost three percentage points lower than the Fed’s.

Mr. Draghi said ECB policymakers would consider “in the coming weeks” how to adapt its policy tools “commensurate to the severity of the risk” to the economic outlook.

In particular, the ECB could tweak the parameters of its €2.6 trillion bond-purchase program, known as quantitative easing or QE, to create room for fresh purchases, Mr. Draghi said. (…)

Mr. Draghi also called for support from governments in the shape of fiscal spending, as well as more progress on a common budget tool for the eurozone “of adequate size and design” that could help guard against downturns.

FOMC FEEDSTOCK:

Via The Daily Shot:

  • Empire State vs. the US industrial production:

Source: Deutsche Bank Research 

  • Recently, a sharp cutback in construction spending has been signaling a potential slowdown in the economy.

Source: Piper Jaffray 

  • And here is the Morgan Stanley Business Conditions Index.

Source: Morgan Stanley, @DriehausCapital

U.S. Home Builder Sentiment Declines

 image image

Mortgage refinancing activity surging amid lower interest rates

Data published last week by the Mortgage Bankers Association showed a sharp acceleration in mortgage refinancing applicants in the first week of June. As today’s Hot Chart shows, while the number of applicants remains at present below levels registered in recent refinancing waves (2016 and 2012-2013), the average amount being refinanced is much higher. This means that the total amount refinanced (number of applicants x average amount) is now approaching that observed in the two prior episodes. That’s good news for consumers, who will benefit from a decline in debt service costs. For the bond market, this wave of refinancing may have ended up amplifying downward pressures on yields. Indeed, a rise in the amounts of refinancing means MBS holders face greater-than-expected prepayments (lowering the weighted average duration of their portfolio). In order to offset this unwanted impact on their portfolio, money managers have to buy long duration Treasuries. (NBF)

image
Buying American Isn’t an Option, Some U.S. Companies Say With public hearings on the Trump administration’s China tariff plan set to begin Monday, the U.S. trade representative’s office has already been flooded with letters from companies saying they have few options besides China.

(…) Items to be hit by new tariffs include 273 categories of goods—such as consumer fireworks, fishing reels and electric blankets—for which China accounts for more than 90% of imports. Last year, $66.3 billion worth of these items were imported from China. (…)

Vietnam can handle orders for wood products and textiles but “has very weak infrastructure in metal fabrication,” officials at the Minnesota company said in a letter. In general, factories couldn’t match China’s prices or keep up with production demands.

“It was NOT even close,” they wrote. (…)

In a letter to Mr. Trump on June 13, tariff opponents, including Walmart, Target Corp. and Costco Wholesale Corp. , said current and proposed tariffs would raise costs to a family of four by an average of $2,000 a year.

China – falling into the same long-term rut as Japan?

(…) Fathom’s measure of economic activity in China, the China Momentum Indicator (CMI), slowed to 4.9% in April, down from 5.1% in the twelve months to March, hitting a new two-and-a-half-year low. As highlighted in the chart, this has resulted in a widening of the gap between Fathom’s measure of growth and the official measure, which was a steady 6.4% in the first quarter of the year.

(…) in an attempt to arrest the slowdown in underlying growth, China has resorted to its old tried-and-tested growth tactics of credit-fuelled investment. Problematically for Beijing, these efforts to cushion the economy will only exacerbate existing domestic and global imbalances.

Indeed, weaker trend growth is attributable in part to the astronomical expansion of credit observed in China in recent years, which has led to allocative mistakes at the macro level. That misallocation is evidenced by China’s non-performing loan problem, which, as Fathom detailed in a recent note to clients, is estimated to be a large and rising 28–38% of domestic GDP.

With China’s current policy mix suffering not only diminishing returns but allocative inefficiencies too, Fathom’s central scenario sees China falling into the same kind of long-term rut as Japan. In this world, despite the evergreening of bad loans and perennially low interest rates, China’s economy will slow to around 4% by 2021.

India tariff hike shows vulnerability of US trade strategy. India has struck back after the US withdrew its preferential tariff schedule

India has decided to impose long-awaited tariffs on 28 product groups after the US said it would roll back a duty-free imports scheme for approximately $6 billion worth of imports from India. The tariffs came into effect on Sunday. These retaliatory measures show the vulnerability of the high pressure strategy characterised by the current US trade policy. Not all countries will give in so easily to US demands as, for example, Mexico did. Countries that are less dependent on trade with the US will resist, with the risk of escalating tit-for-tat tariff fights. If it pushes too far in negotiations with India, Japan, the EU, and China, the US could end up being the biggest loser of all. This is because it would then face tariffs with all its trading partners involved in the disputes while the EU and the other counties would face higher tariffs only at the US border. (…)

The 28 products affected include agricultural products, with tariffs being raised by up to 120%. The measures are reportedly expected to raise about $217 million of tax revenues. Assuming that the average increase is about 50%, the tariffs will affect 1% to 2% of total Indian merchandise imports from the US. Although this is only a small fraction of US – Indian trade, it further inflames tensions between the two countries. (ING)

Saudis to Push for OPEC Cuts, Despite Tanker Attacks Saudi Arabia is set to push for OPEC to cut oil output in the second half of the year, as signs of slowing global demand for crude outweigh threats of war and worries about supply disruptions in the Middle East.
SENTIMENT WATCH

(…) Equity allocations saw the second-biggest drop on record, while cash holdings jumped by the most since the 2011 debt-ceiling crisis, the June poll showed. Concerns about the trade war, a recession and “monetary policy impotence” all contributed to the bearish sentiment, Bank of America said. (…)

Global growth expectations collapsed, Bank of America said, with half of the surveyed fund managers forecasting weakness over the next 12 months. The surge in cash levels set off the strategists’ contrarian buy signal for stocks, even as the poll showed relative exposure to equities over bonds narrowed to the tightest level since May 2009. (…)

The survey conducted between June 7 and 13 showed a rotation into fixed income, cash, utilities and staples and away from banking, tech and euro-area shares. (…)

image

Is this the capitulation that the contrarian in you is dying for? Nope! Watch the II for that as Ed Yardeni illustrates:

image

EARNINGS WATCH

Two weeks left to the second quarter. The number of negative pre-announcements has been stable in recent weeks and is in line with Q1’19 at the same time. However, positive pre-announcements have declined significantly.

image

Tech looks vulnerable as this Broadcom announcement last Friday suggests (my emphasis):

Let me [Hock E. Tan, Broadcom Inc. – CEO] address the current business environment and our outlook for the remainder of the year. We have, as I indicated, performed very much to plan in the first half of fiscal ’19. And in the second half, we had expected a recovery. However, while enterprise and mainframe software demand remained stable, particularly in North America and Europe, with respect to semiconductors, it is clear that the U.S.- China trade conflict, including the Huawei export ban, is creating economic and political uncertainty and reducing visibility for our global OEM customers. As a result, demand volatility has increased and our customers are actively reducing inventory levels to manage risks. This leads us to believe the second half of 2019 will be more in line with the first half as opposed to the previously expected recovery. We now anticipate fiscal 2019 semiconductor solutions segment revenue of $17.5 billion, which translates into a year-over-year decline in the high single digits.

Analysts have been busy reducing estimates. Last week, 89.2% of IT company revisions were down. Industrials: 80%. We’ll soon see if this is corporate positioning or real.

imageimage

Last week, Factset noted that for companies that generate more than 50% of sales inside the U.S., the Q2 estimated earnings growth rate is 1.4%. For companies that generate less than 50% of sales inside the U.S., the estimated earnings decline is -9.3%.

At the sector level, the Information Technology is expected to be the largest contributor to the earnings decline for S&P 500 companies with more global exposure in Q2. Overall, this sector is predicted to report the highest earnings decline of all eleven sectors in Q2. This sector also has the highest international revenue exposure of all eleven sectors in the index.

FYI:

FYI:

Experts: Spy used AI-generated face to connect with targets

(…) The Katie Jones profile was modest in scale, with 52 connections. But those connections had enough influence that they imbued the profile with credibility to some who accepted Jones’ invites. The AP spoke to about 40 other people who connected with Jones between early March and early April of this year, many of whom said they routinely accept invitations from people they don’t recognize.

“I’m probably the worst LinkedIn user in the history of LinkedIn,” said Winfree, the former deputy director of President Donald Trump’s domestic policy council, who confirmed connection with Jones on March 28.

Winfree, whose name came up last month in relation to one of the vacancies on the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, said he rarely logs on to LinkedIn and tends to just approve all the piled-up invites when he does.

“I literally accept every friend request that I get,” he said. Confused smile

Good judgement!!! Fit for a Fed governor job?

THE DAILY EDGE: 17 JUNE 2019

U.S. Retail Sales Firm Broadly; Revisions Show Improvement

Total retail sales increased 0.5% (3.2% y/y) during May following a 0.3% April increase, revised from a 0.2% slip reported initially.(…) Retail sales excluding motor vehicles and parts rose 0.5% (3.2% y/y), the same as during April, revised from 0.1%.

Last month, sales of motor vehicle & parts increased 0.7% (3.1% y/y) after a 0.5% fall during April. This compared to a 6.2% gain in unit sales of motor vehicles during May.

A measure of the underlying pace of retail spending is nonauto sales growth excluding gasoline and building materials. These sales rose 0.5% (3.4% y/y) after a 0.4% rise, revised from unchanged.

Sales strength was broad-based last month. (…) Restaurant & drinking establishment sales  increased 0.7% (3.7% y/y) after a 0.3% rise.

Post the important April revision, retail sales have been quite strong, rising at a 10.8% annualized nominal rate since March. Yet, they are only up 3.2% YoY in May.

image

Bespoke details the broad strength:

The table below shows monthly streaks of gains or losses for each of the sectors tracked in the Retail Sales report.  Here we can see how broad and consistent the strength has been in Retail Sales after taking revisions into account.  Five sectors have seen m/m growth for five straight months, and no group has seen more than one straight month of decline.   Bars and Restaurants are one group that has seen sales growth for five consecutive months, and while it has yet to overtake Food and Beverage Stores in terms of its total share of sales, it’s getting close.

(Bespoke)

However, we are still feeling the effect of December’s huge –1.6% drop and the very erratic monthly trends since last November. In the last 7 months, only three showed positive growth in real sales.

fredgraph (7)

Looking at retail sales on a quarterly basis, real growth was negative in Q4’18 and in Q1’19 and in April, before surging in May (which may be revised…). If we annualize April and May, real sales are up 2.6% but this follows –1.6% annualized in the previous 2 quarters. On a trailing 6-month basis, real sales have totally stalled since last October.

image

The FOMC has to deal with this erratic behavior and decide if this stalling is transitory, the month of May perhaps being a solid, though revisable, evidence of consumer strength, or if we are seeing a repeat of 2000 and 2007 when real sales stalled in the year before the recessions.

Some economists suggest that restaurant sales are a good gauge for discretionary spending as dining out is an easily postponable expenditure. Bespoke above shows how strong restaurant sales have been in the past 5 months but they are using nominal sales, disregarding the sharp acceleration in Food-at-Home inflation which has risen 3.6% annualized since December.

In reality, real restaurant sales growth has decelerated sharply to only 0.7% YoY in May from 6.8% in July 2018.

  image

The May Restaurant Industry Snapshot from TDn2K confirms the slow growth: on a rolling 3 months basis, same-restaurant sales are up only 0.5% in nominal dollars while traffic is down 2.5%. “It is only through an acceleration of guest check growth that the industry continues to achieve positive sales.”

Americans now spend more on food away from home than at home…

image

…in large part because restaurant inflation has substantially outpaced grocery store inflation. Any economic slowdown will really hurt the restaurant industry.

image

In all, the FOMC members will struggle with the consumer but should not consider it a dependable source of strength.

U.S. Business Inventories Rise in April as Sales Decline

Total business inventories increased 0.5% (5.3% year-on-year) during April, after being unchanged in March (unrevised). Total business sales decreased 0.2% (+2.8% y/y) following a 1.3% gain (revised down from 1.6%). The inventory-to-sales (I/S) ratio ticked up to 1.39 from an upwardly-revised 1.38. Business inventory swings can have a meaningful impact on GDP. In the first quarter inventories added 0.6 percentage point to GDP growth.

Retail inventories increased 0.5% (4.6% y/y) in April after declining 0.3%. Auto inventories, which comprise roughly 35% of retail inventories, grew 0.8% (8.2% y/y). Non-auto retail inventories rose 0.4% (2.6% y/y).(…) Factory sector inventories gained 0.3% (3.8% y/y). As reported last week, wholesale inventories were up 0.8% (7.6% y/y). (…)

The inventory-to-sales ratio in the retail sector was unchanged at 1.45. The non-auto I/S ratio ticked up down to 1.19, slightly above the historic low of 1.17 reached in November 2018 (data goes back to 1967). The wholesale and factory sector I/S ratios edged up to 1.34 and 1.37 respectively.

image

Nerd smile Business Sales is not a widely mediatized stat. Yet, it strongly correlates with the growth in S&P 500 revenues.

image

S&P 500 Revenues grew 3.5% in Q1 per Ed Yardeni, above Business Sales’ 2.6% growth rate, substantially helped by the surge in March in what has also been a pretty erratic trend in MoM sales. In effect, Business Sales are up only 0.6% annualized in the last 6 months.

image

On a YoY basis, Business Sales are up 2.8% in April and only 2.4% ex-Petroleum. Why does it matter? Because this means that S&P 500 revenues will likely decelerate even more, challenging operating margins when labor costs are accelerating and supply chains are meaningfully disrupted.

S&P 500 companies’ earnings surprised by +6.0% in Q1 but it would be prudent not to bet on a repeat in coming quarters.

U.S. Industrial Production Rebounds

Industrial production increased 0.4% (2.0% y/y) during May and recouped a 0.4% April decline, revised from -0.5%. Output has declined 0.9% since December. (…) Manufacturing activity recovered 0.2% (0.7% y/y) during May following a 0.5% decline. Output is down 1.5% versus December. Utilities output rebounded 2.1% (0.3% y/y) last month after a 3.1% drop. Mining activity improved 0.1% (10.0% y/y) following a 2.2% increase. (…)

Capacity utilization rebounded to 78.1% in May and made up most of its April decline to 77.9%. (…) The factory sector utilization rate rose to 75.7%. Mining sector capacity utilization eased to 91.3%, and remained below December’s cycle high of 93.2%. Growth in capacity in the manufacturing sector continues to strengthen, up 1.1% y/y.

High five Don’t buy this “rebound” says Markit:

Official data on manufacturing output showed production rising in May, but the muted increase leaves the sector with a big hill to climb in June to avoid falling into contraction for a second successive quarter, corroborating earlier weak PMI survey data from IHS Markit.

Manufacturing output rose 0.2% in May according to official data from the Federal Reserve. The rise was the first recorded so far this year, so represented a welcome sign of revival. However, survey data hint strongly that the underlying business environment remained subdued in May, meaning growth could remain weak or production even contract in June.

The sector is consequently close to falling into a technical recession. Even with the 0.2% expansion of production in May, output so far in the second quarter is running 0.6% below that of the first quarter. Barring revisions to back data, it would need a 1.6% surge in production to avoid manufacturing output falling in the second quarter. With output having dropped 0.6% in the first quarter, two consecutive quarters of decline would meet the definition of a recession. The last time the manufacturing economy recorded two or more consecutive quarters of decline was 2015-16, and prior to that 2009.

The likelihood of production growth gaining momentum in June looks slim. The IHS Markit PMI survey’s manufacturing output gauge, which exhibits an 89% correlation with the three-month-on-three-month change in the official data, remained deep in territory consistent with falling output in May.

The PMI surveys tend to give a good indication of underlying production trends, cutting through some of the noise of volatile monthly changes in official data. As such, the US PMI hints that the rise in production in May masks a broader malaise in the factory sector. Indeed, the rise in output in May was linked to a jump in vehicle production. Excluding car makers, output was flat.

Worryingly, the PMI survey’s new orders index fell in May to its lowest since August 2009. The decline meant output growth exceeded that of new orders to the greatest extent since September 2016, a development which suggests companies will seek to adjust production down further in coming months in line with the downturn in order book inflows.

The PMI survey’s forward-looking new orders-to-inventory ratio meanwhile also fell in May, down to its lowest for almost two years, adding to the prospect of production remaining subdued in June. Furthermore, companies themselves also grew more concerned about the outlook, often linked to escalating trade war worries. Manufacturers’ expectations of their own production trends over the coming year fell markedly in May to the joint-lowest since the series began in July 2012.

(…) New orders fell to a three-year low, while unfilled orders dropped to the lowest level since 2015. The employment index posted its first negative reading in two years, suggesting a pullback in the number of workers, while the average workweek shortened. (…)

New York state manufacturing index drops by most on record
All five regional Fed factory gauges have weakened in recent months
TECHNICALS WATCH

Lowry’s Research keeps the green flag up, pointing out that historically, breadth leads price, and “new highs in the Adv-Dec Lines are typically followed by new highs in the price indexes. Thus, the new high in the NY all-issues Adv-Dec Line suggests that new highs in the S&P 500 should follow in the weeks ahead.”

That said, Lowry’s warns that small caps are the exception and “a continued lag in small cap breadth should be closely monitored, as this lag could be an early indication of an aging bull market.”

Lowry’s analysis of Supply and Demand suggest that “investors are finding little reason to sell into the rally. The lack of selling appears especially important since the rally from the June 3rd low has taken the S&P 500 back to the levels of the Sept. 2018 and late Apr. 2019 market highs – levels where enough selling existed to send prices lower. In addition, this lack of selling is occurring despite the presence of overbought readings on short-term indicators.”

Trump Delayed Pence’s Tiananmen Square Speech in Hopes of Landing Xi Meeting

Vice President Mike Pence was set to deliver a speech criticizing China’s human rights record on June 4, the anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre — until Donald Trump stepped in.

The president delayed the speech to avoid upsetting Beijing ahead of a potential meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping at the Group of 20 meeting in Japan at the end of this month, according to several people familiar with the matter. Trump also put off U.S. sanctions on Chinese surveillance companies that Pence planned to preview in his remarks.

The speech was tentatively rescheduled for June 24, just days before the Osaka meetings. But with Beijing signaling that Xi might not agree to a meeting, there is now debate within the administration about when Pence should deliver the speech and how hard he should be on the Chinese. (…)

“If he shows up, good,” Trump told Fox News. “If he doesn’t — in the meantime, we’re taking in billions of dollars a month. Eventually, they’re going to make a deal, because they’re going to have to. Look, they’re paying hundreds of billions of dollars.” (…)

United States suspends WTO intellectual property litigation against China

The United States has halted a World Trade Organization dispute over China’s treatment of intellectual property rights until Dec. 31, the WTO dispute panel hearing the case said in a statement published on Friday.

The panel of three adjudicators said the United States asked for the suspension on June 3 and China agreed the next day. (…)

Huawei Has 56,492 Patents and It’s Not Afraid to Use Them

(…) Last year alone, Huawei received 1,680 U.S. patents, making it the 16th biggest recipient, figures by Fairview Research’s IFI Patent Claims Services show. Huawei’s total portfolio of active patents and published applications is 102,911, according to Anaqua, an intellectual property-management software firm. (…)

U.S. companies adapting to ongoing China tariffs

Many companies have held off raising prices to offset tariffs, in hopes that they would go away.

As it becomes clear that the risk of tariffs will linger, more companies are taking steps to mitigate them and accepting trade conflict with China as a new fact of life, according to businesses and trade groups interviewed by Reuters. (…)

Jacob Parker, vice-president of China operations at the U.S.-China Business Council in Beijing, said even in the event of a trade deal, it was possible the persistent threat of tariffs would continue to push U.S. companies’ supply chains out of the country. Similarly, Chinese firms are likely reconsidering their reliance on U.S. companies, he said. (…)

On Thursday, shoemaker Crocs Inc. highlighted the threat of the Trump administration’s trade policy changes, especially the tariffs.

“It may be time-consuming and expensive for us to alter our business operations in order to adapt to or comply with any such changes,” the company said. (…)

Kubota held off raising prices until now in hopes that the costs associated with tariffs – including higher prices for imported parts from China – would be short-lived. Kubota has 10 U.S. factories, with seven in Kansas. Its business has been hammered by retaliatory tariffs on U.S. farmers, Mr. Stucke said.

“We held out as long as we could,” he said. The company is implementing across-the-board price increases of 1 per cent to 5 per cent, depending on the item, as of Friday.

Broadcom’s $2 billion warning rattles global chip sector

Broadcom Inc sent a shockwave through the global chipmaking industry on Friday with its forecast that U.S.-China trade tensions and the ban on doing business with Huawei Technologies would knock $2 billion off the company’s sales this year. (…)

“We’ll see a very sharp impact simply because (there are) no purchases allowed and there’s no obvious substitution in place,” Chief Executive Officer Hock Tan said on a post-earnings call with analysts on the Huawei ban.

Huawei accounted for about $900 million, or 4%, of the company’s overall sales last year. Broadcom, however, also said the forecast cut “extends beyond one particular customer.”

“We’re talking about uncertainty in our marketplace, uncertainty because of the – of demand in the form of order reduction as the supply chain out there constricts – compress, so to speak,” Tan said. (…)

Finisar Corp, which makes sensors for facial recognition, transceivers and other components for telecommunication networks, said in a regulatory filing that ban on Huawei could have continuing negative impact on its future revenue. Huawei represented 10% of its total revenue in fiscal 2019.

The CEO of chipmaker Micron Technology also said the ban on Huawei brings uncertainty and disturbance to the semiconductor industry. (…)

Huawei Warns Trump’s Ban Might Wipe Out $30 Billion of Sales Growth

Sales at China’s largest technology company will likely remain stagnant at about $100 billion in 2019 and 2020, the billionaire said during a panel discussion, quantifying for the first time the hit from a plethora of Trump administration restrictions. Huawei however will aim to maintain its research and development budget and refrain from layoffs or major asset sales. (…)

The founder has conceded that Trump administration curbs will cut into a two-year lead it’s painstakingly built over rivals like Ericsson AB and Nokia Oyj. (…)

But Huawei has also said it will ramp up its own chip supply and find alternatives to keep its edge in smartphones and 5G. (…)

Huawei warns ban will hit 1,200 US suppliers Chinese telecoms group says cyber security vendors among those at risk