The enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it’s the illusion of knowledge (Stephen Hawking)

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so (Mark Twain)

Invest with smart knowledge and objective odds

TEN

TENTH YEAR

I started blogging on finance on January 3, 2009 after completely retiring from the corporate world.

  • To try to make sense of the mess the world was in.
  • To distinguish between facts, rumours, alt-facts and fake news.
  • To do thorough and objective analysis.
  • To publish the pertinent facts (new$-to-use.com) and analysis to ensure thoroughness, depth and objectivity.

On March 3, 2009, I concluded that there was essentially no more downside to the S&P 500 Index then at 666 (S&P 500 P/E Ratio at Troughs: A Detailed Analysis of the Past 80 Years), re-introducing the Rule of 20 (originally from Jim Moltz in 1986) demonstrating that this was a generational low. Since then, I have written, almost daily, presenting, discussing and analysing pertinent facts, criticized poorly researched and biased articles and opinions, while regularly offering and detailing my own analysis and views so that readers could make up their own mind and act according to their own risk aversion profile.

I make extensive use of the media and blogosphere worlds since their treatment of the info shapes opinions and, therefore, valuations, positively or negatively. My own work and analysis are open and free, totally clear of advertising, for anybody to use and I fully intend to keep it that way. Hopefully, Edge and Odds can help a few people better manage their financial investments.

Several years ago, a reader sent a $5.00 donation, apologizing for the token amount, explaining that he could hardly afford any more having been “wiped out” during the Financial Crisis because he had relied on media and brokers. He wanted to encourage me to keep writing objectively. Thank you Steven, quite an inspiration!

Many readers are kind enough to voluntarily send money to Edge and Odds. This is very welcome given that the Fed’s goal of 2% inflation has been amply exceeded in financial services ten years after the trough. All donations are reinvested in research material for the blog. In 2017, I subscribed to Lowry’s Research which has been doing intelligent and sensible technical analysis since 1938. More recently, I have subscribed to a few more services to complement my own work.

As a result, Edge and Odds has added depth to the ratings of financial markets as you might have noticed in the sidebar.

The Fundamental Rating section breaks down into

  • the Rule of 20 P/E rating (risk/reward ratio based on valuation)
  • the 120 Yield Spread (yield curve trends)
  • the earnings trends, really focused on trailing EPS
  • the inflation trends which not only impact valuations but also central banks behavior

Readers can now see the trends in the 2 important components of the Rule of 20 P/E.

I have added Technical ratings, largely inspired by Lowry’s work but also using other useful indicators and a rating on investor sentiment (from Ned Davis Research) which is a contrarian indicator currently at its most negative.

Hopefully, we will all benefit, especially as this bull, also beginning its tenth year, will surely make us live another historic moment.

TENTH INNING

With just about every sensible valuation parameters having reached near historical levels (I initially wrote “histerical”!), it’s fair to say that this game is now in overtime. It took ten years to get here, ten years during which we witnessed valuations going from generational lows to near historic highs (ex-the dotcom bubble), interest rates reaching 700-year lows (!) and investor sentiment going from extreme pessimism to extreme optimism. Bernanke’s gambit worked!

We are witnessing (and actually playing in) a truly historic game.

This is more akin to baseball than to most other sports. This overtime will likely not end in sudden death like in 1987. This bull seems to be of an enduring specie thanks to its strong sponsorship from central banks around the world. Slow inflation, rising profits and ample liquidity are feeding the beast. I don’t really know in what sequence the final three strikes will occur but I would venture this:

  • strike one: rising inflation and interest rates.
  • strike two: declining liquidity as CBs seek to rapidly normalize.
  • strike three: weaker profits either due to recession or a margin squeeze.

How many innings left?

Dunno. But I know this game will eventually end. I sure hope to be able to play a few more.

THE DAILY EDGE (2 January 2018)

Gift with a bow Here’s how long it will take Americans to pay off their Christmas debt

Shoppers in the U.S. racked up an average of $1,054 of debt this Christmas season — an increase of 5% over last year, according to a survey from MagnifyMoney, a personal finance website. It found 44% of shoppers racked up more than $1,000 in holiday debt, and 5% accumulated more than $5,000 in debt.

Bouncing back from those purchases won’t come quickly. Only half of those surveyed expected to repay the debt within 3 months — others (29%) said they need more than five months to pay it off, often leading to interest on the credit card debt and growing balances. In fact, 10% of people who took on holiday debt said they would only be able make minimum payments on credit cards. (…)

Same chart published Dec. 27 but up-to-date as of Dec. 20:

Wages Finally Start to Grow in Tight Labor Markets In U.S. cities with the tightest labor markets, workers are finding something that’s long been missing from the broader economic expansion: faster-growing paychecks. Businesses are raising pay to attract employees in cities such as Minneapolis and Denver, where unemployment rates stand near or even below 3%.

(…) City-level data “show the relationship between wage growth and a tight labor market still holds,” said Adam Kamins, senior economist at Moody’s Analytics. (…)  Large metro areas including Denver, San Jose, Calif., and Austin, Texas,​ also have unemployment rates below 4% and are experiencing wage growth of at least double the 2% national average. The same trend is happening in smaller areas including Fort Myers, Des Moines, Iowa, and Ogden, Utah. (…)

“As far as positions we struggle with, it’s kind of all of them actually,” he said. About nine months ago, forklift drivers were making between $12 and $13 an hour. Today, hourly pay can go as high as $16 an hour. (…)

Workers in 18 States Get Minimum-Wage Increases

The new year will bring higher minimum wages in 18 states and almost two dozen municipalities, continuing a recent trend of steady pay increases for the lowest-paid workers.

In some cases, the increases represent one of several steps in a multiyear process to slowly raise the minimum wage. Arizona, for instance, will see its pay floor rise 50 cents on Jan. 1, followed by another 50 cents in 2019 and $1 in 2020, part of a four-year process to boost the base salary for workers who don’t work for tips to $12 an hour by 2020. (…)

DECEMBER PMIs

The seasonally adjusted IHS Markit final US Manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index™ (PMI™) registered 55.1 in December, up from 53.9 in November. The latest index reading was the highest since March 2015 and signalled a solid improvement in the health of the sector. December data also rounded off the strongest quarterly performance since the start of 2015.

image

Output at manufacturers expanded at a steep pace in December, with growth reaching an eleven-month high. Panellists attributed greater production to more favourable demand conditions and increased new order volumes.

New business received by manufacturers continued to rise in December, with the rate of expansion accelerating to a ten-month high. Anecdotal evidence linked increases to greater demand from new and existing clients. Exports sales, however, grew at a marginal pace.

In line with greater production requirements, firms added to their payrolls and at the fastest rate since September 2014. Increased capacity pressures were also reflected in backlog accumulation. The upturn in outstanding business accelerated and was the quickest since October 2015.

Meanwhile, input price pressures intensified with the rate of cost inflation accelerating for the second consecutive month. Furthermore, the marked rate of increase was the second-fastest since December 2013. Panellists linked rises to higher raw material prices, which partly stemmed from supplier delays. Meanwhile, factory gate charges rose solidly, despite the rate of inflation softening since November.

The eurozone manufacturing sector ended 2017 on a high note. Strong rates of expansion in output, new orders and employment pushed the final IHS Markit Eurozone Manufacturing PMI® to 60.6 in December, its best level since the survey began in mid-1997.

image

The expansion was led by the investment goods sector, where the pace of growth signalled by the PMI was also a record high. The rate of improvement in the intermediate goods sector remained close to November’s survey-record. Growth was slower in the consumer goods sector by comparison, but remained solid and well above its long-run trend.

National data signalled further broad-based growth, with business conditions improving across all of the countries covered. PMI readings were at survey record highs in Austria, Germany and Ireland, and remained close to November’s series peak in the Netherlands. Rates of expansion in France and Greece were the fastest for over 17 and nine years respectively. Growth also remained robust, albeit slower, in Italy and Spain.

Underpinning the strong headline PMI were near record increases in euro area manufacturing output and new orders, both of which rose to the greatest extents since April 2000. Domestic market conditions remained robust, while growth of new export business was only a tick below November’s survey high. New export orders rose at, or close to, record rates in Austria, Germany and the Netherlands and remained solid in of the all other nations covered. (…)

Robust intakes of new business tested capacity, leading to a further marked increase in backlogs of work. Outstanding business increased at the sharpest pace in the series history, led by marked gains in Germany, France and Austria. This in turn supported a joint-survey record increase in euro area manufacturing employment. (… )

December saw rates of inflation in output prices and input costs remain elevated, despite slowing slightly since November. Part of the increase in purchase prices reflected ongoing supply chain pressures, with average vendor lead times lengthening to one of the greatest extents on record. (…)

The headline PMI pointed to a stronger improvement in Chinese manufacturing operating conditions at the end of 2017. Latest data highlighted faster growth of output, total new work and export sales. Greater production led to a further rise in buying activity, with the rate of growth quickening to a four-month high. At the same time, capacity pressures continued to build, with backlogs rising amid a further decline in workforce numbers (albeit marginal).

Inflationary pressures remained elevated, with input costs rising sharply and prices charged increasing at a solid pace.

The seasonally adjusted Purchasing Managers’ Index™ (PMI™) posted 51.5 in December, up from 50.8 in November, to signal a further improvement in the health of the sector. Though modest, the rate of strengthening was the highest seen for four months.

image

Manufacturing production continued to increase across China at the end of 2017. Notably, the rate of expansion quickened to a three-month record. Improved sales and stronger underlying market demand were cited as key sources of growth in December. Furthermore, total new orders expanded at the steepest pace since August, with export sales also rising at a faster pace at the end of the year.

Despite stronger increases in output and new work, manufacturers continued to shed staff in December. That said, the rate of job losses was the weakest seen for nine months and marginal. Nonetheless, lower staff numbers contributed to another rise in outstanding business, with the rate of accumulation quickening slightly since November.

Higher production prompted firms to raise their buying activity for the seventh month running. Moreover, the rate of growth was the fastest seen since August. However, stock shortages at suppliers and delays linked to environmental inspections led to a further lengthening of average delivery times. (…)

Average input costs continued to rise sharply, despite the rate of inflation softening to a four-month low. Anecdotal evidence indicated that higher costs for a variety of raw materials drove up cost burdens. Consequently, firms increased their selling prices solidly. (…)

EARNINGS WATCH

Thomson Reuters/IBES:

  • The estimated earnings growth rate for the S&P 500 for Q4 2017 is 12.0%. If the Energy sector is excluded, the growth rate declines to 9.5%.
  • In the S&P 500, there have been 69 negative EPS preannouncements issued by corporations for Q4 2017 compared to 42 positive EPS preannouncements. By dividing 69 by 42 one arrives at an N/P ratio of 1.6 for the S&P 500 Index. This 1.6 ratio is below the N/P ratio at the same point in time in Q4 2016 (2.0), and below the long-term aggregate (since 1995) N/P ratio for the S&P 500 (2.8).

imageimageimage

The first few weeks of 2018 will be important as we watch the earnings releases and the guidance for 2018 including the effects of the tax reform. So far, sell side analysts have not done much work on the new U.S. tax regime.

image

EUROPE?

European companies are slow reporters, possibly in no rush to disappoint, even when the economy is accelerating:

  • Thomson Reuters reports that 275 companies in the STOXX 600 have reported earnings to date for Q3 2017. Of these, 48.5% reported results exceeding analyst estimates. In a typical quarter 50% beat analyst EPS estimates.
  • In aggregate, companies are reporting earnings that are 4.6% below estimates, which is below the 4% long term (since 2011) average surprise factor. Now that is 4.6% below the estimate at the end of the quarter; it is some 8% below the estimates at mid-year.
  • 307 companies in the STOXX 600 have reported revenue to date for Q3 2017. Of these, 45.6% reported revenue exceeding analyst estimates. In a typical quarter 54% beat analyst revenue estimates.
  • In aggregate, companies are reporting revenues that are 1.9% above estimates.
  • Third quarter earnings are expected to increase 1.3% from Q3 2016. Excluding the Energy sector, earnings are expected to decrease 2.6%. Third quarter revenue is expected to increase 3.8% from Q3 2016. Excluding the Energy sector, earnings are expected to increase 2.0%.

image

image
What Inflation Could Mean for the Market Even a small uptick in inflation in 2018 could catch markets off-guard. How to prepare.

What Inflation Could Mean for the Market(…) Such a jolt could reshuffle the market. Since 1950, stocks have traded at an average multiple of 18.1 times earnings when inflation has ranged between zero and 2%—the “sweet spot,” says SunTrust Chief Market Strategist Keith Lerner. At 2% to 4%, the multiple slips to 17.2. (…)

The producer price index, which measures the prices that goods and services producers get, rose 3.1% on a year-over-year basis in November, the fastest rate since January 2012. Lumber prices have risen this year and are expected to continue trending higher next year, potentially forcing home prices higher, too. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York introduced an inflation measure this year, the Underlying Inflation Gauge, which tracks consumer and producer prices, commodity prices, and real and financial asset prices. Based on prior data, it is at an 11-year high, near 3%. (…)

Sure looks like the Rule of 20 to me! Yet, no mention of it.

Here’s how the S&P 500 trailing P/E behaves during various inflation periods:

image

And here’s the Rule of 20 P/E with its stable, dependable range under all conditions:image

Not only do you know what inflation can mean for the market, you can also calculate and measure the valuation risk around the “20 fair value” level. This bull is pretty normal so far having gone from deep undervaluation in 2009-10-12 to nearly full value. Since this is on trailing EPS, it would not be surprising to see valuations exceed previous highs of 23-24 if investors fully buy the profit boosts from the tax reform. That said, we know this is pretty late at the party. Three risk factors here:

  • profit risk: mainly tied to recession risk given current trends and tax reform. Low risk level currently.
  • inflation risk: the Fed is totally focused on 2.0%+ inflation and openly willing to allow some overshooting. Inflation going from 1.8% to 2.5% reduces the Rule of 20 “fair P/E from 18.2 to 17.5, increasing the potential downside to fair value from 13.0% to 16.5%.
  • confidence risk: this risk is now at its maximum given current confidence readings and rising interest rates. A confidence shake up could be nasty given that TINA is no longer in everyone’s mind as 2Y Treasuries flirt with 2.0% yields. Buying the dips may not be as “automatic”.

If you’re wondering,

  • here’s the P/E on forward earnings:

image

  • And the Shiller P/E for the same period. Scary but not terribly credible nor useful.

image

The price of a digital currency called Ripple surged 50% on Friday, pushing its market valuation to a record $85 billion, second only to bitcoin among crypto-assets.

(…) Friday’s move puts it ahead of Ethereum’s $72 billion valuation, and is second to only bitcoin, currently at $244 billion. (…)

For XRP, the gains come after the latest signs that the company behind the currency, also called Ripple, has shown more progress in signing up banks to its closed-loop network, called RippleNet.

Earlier this month, the currency got a boost after a consortium of Japanese banks signed up to test its network. The company has more than 100 banks, mostly outside the U.S., signed onto its platform. It has not disclosed amounts, but has said that some of those banks have been using it in a live environment to move money, rather than just testing it as a concept.

XRP is different from other digital currencies in that its development is being guided and controlled by a single, for-profit company. Ripple the company launched its currency in 2012, as part of a plan to use the concepts behind bitcoin to build a cross-border, interbank payments and settlement network. (…)

When Ripple launched the network in 2012, it created 99 billion XRP. About 38 billion have been distributed; the company holds with rest, with plans to release them publicly over time. (…)

Happy and Healthy New Year!