The enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it’s the illusion of knowledge (Stephen Hawking)

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so (Mark Twain)

Invest with smart knowledge and objective odds

NEW$ & VIEW$ (6 FEB. 2015): Currencies; Earnings; Putin.

Job gains better-than-forecast in January

  • January Nonfarm Payrolls: +257K vs. consensus +234K, +252K previous.
  • Unemployment rate: 5.7% vs. 5.6% consensus, 5.8% previous.
U.S. Small-Business Owners’ Optimism Highest Since 2008

U.S. small-business owners are the most optimistic they have been in seven years, according to the latest Wells Fargo/Gallup Small Business Index. The index, at +71, has increased significantly for two consecutive quarters, and reflects optimism in small-business owners’ views of both their current situation and their expectations for the future.

Wells Fargo/Gallup Small Business Index

U.S. Worker Productivity Deteriorates Pushing Unit Labor Costs Higher

Nonfarm productivity declined at a 1.8% annual rate last quarter and was unchanged y/y. The figure followed an upwardly revised 3.7% increase in Q3. For all of last year, worker productivity rose 0.8% on average, about the same as it did in the prior two years. Real output increased at a 3.2% rate last quarter (3.1% y/y) while hours worked gained 5.1% (3.1% y/y). Compensation per hour increased a diminished 0.9% (1.9% y/y) but when adjusted for lower prices, it improved 2.1% (0.7% y/y). The deterioration in productivity caused unit labor costs to jump 2.7% in Q4 (1.9% y/y), reversing it Q3 gain. The Q4 productivity decline compared to expectations for a 0.8% rise in the Action Economics Forecast Survey. A 1.0% rise in unit labor costs was expected.

Manufacturing sector worker productivity rose at a lessened 1.3% rate (2.8% y/y) after a 3.2% rise. For all of last year, productivity grew 2.5% on average after a 2.0% rise in 2013. Output grew 5.7% (4.8% y/y) after a 4.8% gain, while hours worked improved 4.3% (1.9% y/y) following a 1.5% Q3 increase. Worker compensation per hour increased at a steady 1.5% rate (2.4% y/y). Adjusted for price inflation, compensation gained 2.8% (1.2% y/y). Unit labor costs improved 0.2% (-0.4% y/y) following two quarters of sharp decline.

U.S. Trade Deficit Widens Unexpectedly as Imports Jump

The U.S. foreign trade deficit in goods and services increased to $46.6 billion during December from $39.8, revised from $39.0 billion. It was the deepest deficit since November 2012 and compared to $38.0 billion expected in the Action Economics Forecast Survey. For all of 2014, the deficit deteriorated to $505.0 billion, giving up roughly half of its 2013 improvement. A 2.2% rise in imports  (4.9% y/y) drove the December deficit’s deterioration as it reversed a 1.8% November decline. Petroleum imports gained 7.7% (-13.4% y/y) despite a m/m fall in crude oil prices to $73.64 per barrel from $82.95. The quantity of energy-related imports rose by nearly one-third (9.9% y/y). Overall exports fell 0.8% (+1.1% y/y) after a 1.1% decline. For the year, exports gained 2.9% as they did in 2013. In constant dollars, merchandise imports rose 3.5% in December (8.8% y/y) while real exports were unchanged (4.7% y/y).

The decline in real merchandise exports reflected a 3.1% drop (+3.2% y/y) in industrial supplies & materials. Foods, feeds & beverage exports also fell 1.2% (-0.3% y/y) while nonauto consumer goods exports were off 0.7% (+8.6% y/y). To the upside, auto exports rebounded 2.8% (7.2% y/y) and capital goods exports gained 2.0% (3.3% y/y). Services exports increased 1.7% (3.4% y/y) as travel exports rose 1.5% (2.0% y/y). On the import side of the trade ledger, industrial supplies & materials increased 9.8% (8.5% y/y) and auto imports jumped 3.5% (8.8% y/y). Capital goods imports gained 0.5% (7.8% y/y) while nonauto consumer goods imports nudged 0.3% higher (7.9% y/y). Services imports increased 2.2% (4.4% y/y) while travel imports gained 3.2% (7.1% y/y).

Non-petroleum imports rose 1.5% MoM in December after falling 0.8% in November. For Q4, they are up 1.7% or 7.0% annualized.

Non-petroleum exports declined 0.6% MoM in December after dropping 2.2% in November. For Q4, they are up 0.2% or 0.8% annualized.

(…) Thus, the swelling of the US trade deficit in 2014’s final quarter may be the sign of things to come. As derived from the monthly trade report, Q4-2014’s 1.4% year-to-year increase by US exports was the slowest of any quarter since the 0.1% of Q4-2009. Fourth quarter 2014’s -2.0% yearly drop by US merchandise exports to emerging market countries included setbacks of -5.6% by shipments to China and -5.1% by sales to Brazil. As derived from the ISM surveys, January’s drop by an index of export orders received by US-based companies warns of less support from foreign customers. (Moody’s)

image

Auto U.S. Car Exports Top Two Million

(…) Last year, about 2.1 million new cars and trucks were built in the U.S. and shipped to other countries, the first time auto exports topped 2 million. (…)

About half of U.S. car exports go to Canada or Mexico, and both countries are big exporters to the U.S. In Mexico, auto makers produced about 3.2 million vehicles last year, a 10% increase over 2013, and exported about 82% of them, mostly to the U.S., according to the Mexican Automotive Industry Association.

(…) A growing number of U.S.-made cars are now going to countries including China, Saudi Arabia and South Korea.

The U.S. has become one of the low-cost places to build cars,” said Ron Harbour, a senior partner with the Oliver Wyman Inc. management consulting firm. (…)

The U.S. dollar’s strength against the Japanese yen and euro is too recent to affect sourcing plans. (…)

Foreign-based car makers like BMW AG and Daimler AG are helping to drive the rise in U.S. auto exports. Both established plants in the U.S., mostly to build SUVs, and both export the majority of their U.S. production.

The 2.1 million cars exported represent about 18% of all U.S. new-vehicle production last year, according to data provider WardsAuto.com. U.S. light-vehicle production was 11.4 million in 2014. And the U.S. is still a big importer of foreign-made cars and SUVs. The U.S. auto trade deficit was about $109.4 billion last year. (…)

Daimler’s Mercedes-Benz and BMW both are planning expansions of their SUV plants in the U.S. South, a move that could further give a boost to exports of those vehicles. The Germany luxury car makers currently export more than half of the total output from those plants.

BMW will spend about $1 billion to boost production of X3 and other SUVs at its plant in South Carolina by 50% to 450,000 vehicles in the next two years. A spokesman said “there is no doubt the number of vehicles exported will increase.” (…)

BTW, the USD remains pretty low (chart from Moody’s):

image

Auto Mercedes has record January car sales as core markets jump German luxury carmaker Mercedes-Benz said on Friday sales jumped 14 percent in January to a record 125,865 models, powered by double-digit gains in Europe, China and the United States.

Daimler’s (DAIGn.DE) flagship division posted 14.5 percent sales increases in each Europe and China to 47,693 and 28,080 cars respectively, the Stuttgart-based manufacturer said.

Deliveries in the U.S. were up 8.9 percent to 24,619 cars.

Ghost This narrative is becoming mainstream. This is Bloomberg’s view:

Is China Preparing for Currency War?

(…) The central bank is cooking up measures to widen the band in which its currency trades. People’s Bank of China officials say it’s about limiting volatility as capital zooms in and out of the economy. Let’s call it what it really is: the first step toward yuan depreciation and currency war. (…)

For China, Japan represents the biggest provocateur. The 30 percent drop in the yen under Prime Minister Shinzo Abe is slamming Chinese industry. Key beneficiaries of the policy such as Toyota and Sony (both projected huge profits this week) are lowering prices to gain market share abroad, effectively exporting deflation. Abe also gives Beijing political cover to devalue. It would be hypocritical, after all, for U.S. Senators Lindsey Graham and Charles Schumer to bash China for currency manipulation and not Japan.

But Fitch says that the RRR cuts are not indicative of monetary loosening:

China’s RRR Cut Less of an Easing Than It Appears

The 50bp reduction in China’s reserve requirement ratio (RRR), effective on 5 February, is less of a policy easing than it appears, says Fitch Ratings. The measure compensates almost exactly for liquidity destroyed by cross-border capital outflows during 2014. Accompanying targeted-easing measures are in line with the authorities’ practice in this easing cycle, going back to 3Q14.

Latest data from the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) indicates that net capital outflows in 2014 totalled USD96bn (CNY575bn). We estimate the 50bp RRR cut by the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) to release around CNY570bn into the economy. Therefore, the liquidity effect of the broad-based RRR cut roughly balances out against the impact of capital outflows.

Also notable is the PBOC’s continuing with targeted-easing measures to lower borrowing costs in certain sectors of the economy, on top of the broad-based easing. The PBOC announced an additional 50bp RRR cut for smaller financial institutions focused on micro enterprises and agricultural lending, as well as a 400bp RRR cut for the Agricultural Development Bank of China (ADBC). We expect these measures to release approximately CNY101bn (USD16bn) in liquidity – CNY85bn for the smaller institutions and CNY16bn for ADBC.

The authorities’ reluctance to reduce RRRs or otherwise loosen policy more aggressively reflects awareness of the risks to systemic stability from rapid credit growth. Fitch expects the authorities will continue to engage in targeted-easing measures to maintain growth at a rate of about 7% over 2015. However, RRRs may be reduced further if substantial net capital outflows continue. (…)

Furthermore, uncertainty remains as to whether the recent easing measures by the PBOC (including the earlier rate cuts in November 2014) will actually result in increasing credit to targeted sectors, such as small and micro enterprises. If banks utilise the monetary loosening to continue expanding credit in sectors which are already highly leveraged, it would exacerbate vulnerabilities in the system and be credit negative.

And Nomura thinks that the cons to devaluation far outweigh the pros (via Ft Alphaville):

CNY depreciation pro and con list from Nomura

Pros

1. Makes exports more competitive, helping to boost growth.

2. Raises the cost of imports, helping to reduce the risk of CPI deflation.

Cons

1. We have shown that very large net hot-money outflows, which tend to occur in tandem with market expectations of CNY/USD depreciation, can push the balance of payments into a deficit. Thus, there appears to be a significant risk of a self-fulfilling spiral forming: more hot-money outflows fuels greater expectations of CNY/USD depreciation, and so on. The result could be an unintended exchange rate depreciation overshoot, or a loss of FX reserves.

2. Hoarding of foreign currencies (FC) from local corporates. From February 2014 to August 2014, RMB depreciation fears prompted a USD112.3bn rise in corporate FC deposits. Although local corporate FC deposits fell from September to December 2014, increased depreciation fears could prompt another rise (Figure 12);

3. Increased RMB depreciation fears can prompt an increase in RMB FX volatility through lower RMB trade settlement flows (Figure 13). Examples of this were seen during the European financial crisis in both Q2 2012 and Q2 2013. This could lead to USD/CNH breaching the weak side of the band;

4. Currency depreciation could cause credit stress (Chinese corporate have significantly increased their foreign currency borrowing in recent years) and a rise in investors’ perceived risk premiums, which can lead to higher market interest rates and reduce the effectiveness of PBoC monetary easing.

5. For a country striving to internationalise its currency, a weak CNY policy sends the wrong message. This is especially important this year for the CNY to be included in the IMF’s SDR basket (5-year review expected this year). We note that, when depreciation expectations were elevated during the US financial crisis, European financial crisis and local market/growth pressures in early 2014, RMB deposits in major financial centres such as HK fell (Figure 14).

6. The boost to exports and growth from CNY depreciation is likely to be limited, as China is still a large outsourcing centre for factories of multinational corporations. CNY depreciation raises the cost of imported inputs that are assembled in China for export, thus limiting the competitive boost to exporters.

7. In any case, China already records record trade surpluses. Increasing these further could provoke a protectionist reaction from its trading partners.

8. The main reason for China’s economic growth slowdown is weakening domestic demand, especially investment. The best antidote is reforms and supportive domestic macro policies, not CNY depreciation.

9. While CNY depreciation can help ease the risk of deflation, higher CPI inflation from more costly imports is not what China needs. This could have the unintended consequence of further weakening domestic demand.

10. CNY depreciation contravenes China’s longer-run goal of economic rebalancing away from export-intensive SOEs, heavy-polluting industries and investment and towards inward focussed private enterprises, services industries and consumption.

GREXIT
imageTsipras Vows to Keep Promises After German Rebuff

Tsipras, 40, is preparing for a speech to parliament on Sunday in which he will set out his legislative agenda at the start of a three-day debate leading up to a confidence vote to confirm his government. On Thursday night he was greeted by the rare sight of a pro-government demonstration in downtown Athens after he vowed to stick to his anti-bailout campaign pledges, despite their rejection by German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble. (Cartoon from The Telegraph)

From Kiron Sarkar via John Mauldin:

The potential final nail in the coffin for Greece is if the ECB Governing Council votes (it needs a 2/3rds majority) to deny Emergency Lending Assistance (ELA) by the Bank of Greece to its banks. Clearly, the Central Bank is watching the Greek Central Bank’s usage of ELA and could take such a decision at any time. That’s a really tough decision for the ECB/Draghi to take, as it’s a political policy issue, rather than one which should be left to a Central Bank.

Greek banks need ELA to cover the massive amount of Euro’s which have and are continuing to be withdrawn from Greek banks by their citizens, who are speaking with their feet. If access to ELA is denied, the Bank of Greece will have no alternative but to print its own currency and for Greece to exit the Euro.

That’s the nuclear scenario for Greece.

OIL
Oil heads for biggest two-week gain in 17 years amid volatility
Angola seeks $1bn in loans as oil falls

Angola has dramatically slashed its budget for the year and is reaching out to the World Bank and international lenders for at least $1bn in loans as Africa’s second-biggest oil producer and one of the continent’s star economic performers grapples with the fallout from the collapse in crude prices.

(…) last month the government effectively wiped $14bn off this year’s budget after it reduced its assumed oil price from $81 a barrel to $40 a barrel.

Oil accounts for about 98 per cent of Angola’s export earnings, more than two-thirds of government revenues and 44 per cent of gross domestic product. (…)

Standard Chartered estimates that Angola’s fiscal break-even oil price is around $110 a barrel, and is forecasting that the budget deficit will widen to at least 7 per cent of GDP this year.

It is basing its calculations on oil averaging $85 a barrel this year, up from its current price of about £54. (…)

Brazil January Inflation at Fastest Pace in Nearly 12 Years

Monthly inflation as measured by the benchmark IPCA index accelerated to 1.24 percent from 0.78 percent in December, the national statistics agency said today in Rio de Janeiro. Annual inflation accelerated to 7.14 percent from 6.41 percent a month earlier, exceeding the target range.

Food and beverage prices in January rose 1.48 percent, after a 1.08 percent rise in December, the statistics agency said in today’s report. Transport prices jumped 1.83 percent after rising 1.38 percent the month before, and housing prices increased 2.42 percent because of an increase in electricity costs.

Regulated prices for items such as electricity, gasoline and buses rose 2.5 percent in January, the most in almost 12 years, the statistics institute said.

In the preceding 12 months, regulated prices rose 7.55 percent. That marked the first time since 2010 that regulated price increases exceeded that of the headline figure. It will accelerate to 10.6 percent by year-end, according to Rosenberg’s Costa.

EARNINGS WATCH

Earnings just keep getting better. As of last night, 317 companies (75.7% of the S&P 500’s market cap) have reported. So far, EPS ex-Energy are seen up 9.4% (9.3% yesterday). Total S&P 500 EPS are seen up 6.4% (6.2%) excluding the likelihood of continued beats. So far, they are beating by 5.0% (5.0%). Strength appears broad based with ~72% of those reported surprising to the upside on EPS. Revenues ex-energy are seen up 4.3%.

Retail is one of the few groups yet to report. Traditional Staples and Discretionary Retailers (excluding Internet Retailers) are projected to see 5.8% earnings growth. Early reporters have beaten by 4.0%, largely the result of margin upside. (RBC)

Ambrose Evans-Pritchard: ‘Putin’s goal is to shatter Nato and reassert Russian dominance’ Former Nato chief Anders Fogh Rasmussen claims Vladimir Putin has ambitions beyond Ukraine and aims to test Western resolve in the Baltic

(…) The fear is that the Kremlin will generate a murky conflict in Estonia or Latvia where there are large Russian minorities, using arms-length action or “little green men” without insignia to disguise any intervention. (…)

“There is a high probability that he will intervene in the Baltics to test Nato’s Article 5,” he said, referring to the solidarity clause that underpins collective security. (…)

Nobody knows what would happen if one of the Baltic states invoked Article 5 protection but was turned down by the Nato Council. Failure to respond would devastate Nato’s credibility and undermine the principle of deterrence, though allies could still act as a coalition of the willing outside the treaty structure. (…)

Mr Rasmussen said the Europeans have slashed military spending so deeply since the financial crisis that they can barely defend themselves without American help. “The situation is critical. We have a lot of soldiers but we can’t move them,” he said.

“Nato countries have cut defence spending by 20pc in real terms over the last five years – and some by 40pc – while Russia has increased by 80pc. The aggression in Ukraine is a wake-up call,” he said. (…)

Mr Rasmussen said there is no truth to Kremlin claims that the West violated pledges at the end of the Cold War that there would be no eastward expansion of the alliance into the territory of former Soviet Union. “No such pledge was ever made, and declassified documents in Washington prove this. It is pure propaganda,” he said.

Pension Funding Levels Plunge as Interest Rates Fall

S&P 500 companies with defined benefit plans suffered a drop in funding levels to 74.3% in January, according to Wilshire Consulting. That’s down from 77.8% in December, which was the lowest end-of-year funding ratio since at least 2000, as far back as Wilshire’s records go.

The January deficit represents a roughly $500 billion difference between the value of pension plan assets and the obligations, said Wilshire.

In a separate report, consulting firm Mercer LLC reported that the total deficit for S&P 1500 companies rose to $654 billion in January, the biggest gap since 2012. The funding level for those companies dropped to 74%, also the lowest since 2012, wiping out all the gains made in 2013.

By law, companies have to make their underfunded pension plans whole through mandatory contributions spread out over several years.

“The larger these required contributions, the less flexibility corporate CEOs and CFOs have in managing their cash flows and directing those corporate assets to more productive activities,” said Steven Foresti, head of investment research at Wilshire Consulting.

Pensions are also hitting corporate earnings. Companies such at AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc., and United Parcel Service Inc. have cited higher pension charges as a drag on earnings in 2014. (…)

The average 65-year-old American woman is now expected to live 88.8 years, up from 86.4. Men who are 65 are expected to live 86.6 years, up from 84.6. (…) Party smile

NEW$ & VIEW$ (25 MARCH 2014)

China Stimulus Expectations May Be Overdone

(…) The Shanghai and Hong Kong equity markets gained ground after the data release on expectations sliding growth would push the government into stimulus mode. In a small way, that shift has already occurred. A meeting of the State Council last week promised to accelerate construction projects to “keep economic activity in a suitable range.”

imageStill, with the government facing conflicting pressures an abrupt about-face in policy is unlikely. A significant step toward stimulus would be a step back from Iron Ore Prices Point to Slowing Growth reforms intended to control runaway corporate credit and local government debt. Doing so might risk a sharper correction down the road.

The State Council’s statement suggests little in the way of new government spending. promises to accelerate existing projects rather than to start new ones, indicating little additional impetus from the public purse.

Similarly, the People’s Bank of China’s recent reintroduction of the 28-day repo at a rate of 4 percent suggests the central bank wants to re-anchor rates at a higher level. At the recent National People’s Congress, PBOC Governor Zhou Xiaochuan said interest rate liberalization is on an accelerated track and is expected to push rates higher.

A growing number of analysts expect a cut in the reserve requirement ratio, which would boost bank lending. The reserve requirement ratio is a blunt instrument, and a cut would signal to the markets that the central bank is stepping back from its deleveraging agenda. Fine tuning liquidity via open-market operations may be a preferable alternative at this point. (…) (BloombergBriefs)

Meat Eaters Gulp Record Prices Before U.S. Grilling Peaks

(…) At a time of year when U.S. prices usually are at seasonal lows, meat is rising faster than any other food group, even before the peak in demand for summer grilling. The domestic cattle herd is the smallest since 1951, after years of drought and high feed costs, and the spread of a piglet-killing disease is tightening hog supplies. Cattle and hog futures in Chicago reached record highs this month. (…)

Cattle futures reached an all-time high of $1.46825 a pound on March 5 on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, up 25 percent from last year’s low in May. Hog futures surged to a record $1.33425 a pound on March 18 and are up 48 percent this year, trailing only coffee among 24 commodities tracked by the Standard & Poor’s GSCI Spot Index.

Domestic wholesale pork is up even more, gaining 56 percent this year to $1.315 a pound on March 21, while beef advanced 20 percent, after touching $2.4406 a pound on March 18, the most since the U.S. Department of Agriculture began using its current measure in 2004.

As of Feb. 25, the USDA predicts retail beef and poultry prices will advance 3 percent to 4 percent this year, faster than the 2.5 percent to 3.5 percent increase forecast for all foods. Steve Meyer, a consulting economist in Adel, Iowa, for the National Pork Board, said the government’s meat forecasts are too low, and that pork will jump as much as 10 percent. (…)

Rising meat costs and food inflation may force Denver-based Chipotle to raise menu prices 3 percent to 5 percent, CFO John R. “Jack” Hartung said on a conference call Jan. 30. (…)

CANADIAN HOUSING
Forget about a crash, Conference Board gives housing market clean bill of health

The Conference Board isn’t buying the notion that Canada’s housing market will suddenly crumble, saying the most likely outlook is for a modest decline nationally and in some specific markets.

The Ottawa-based think-tank argues in a comprehensive new look at real estate in Canada that the conditions for a crash simply don’t exist, despite numerous reports that the market is overbuilt and overvalued.

Rather, the report argues that with the possible exception of Toronto, housing starts the past three years have been roughly in line with the 20-year average.

Even in Toronto, there is only a “borderline” case that it could be overbuilt.

“At this point in the housing cycle, there is a risk that Canadian housing prices in some market segments are due for a modest correction,” the report states.

“Nevertheless, we believe that continued population growth, additional employment gains and modest mortgage rate increases will limit potential price declines in 2014 and 2015.” (…)

The Conference Board says fears of a housing bubble about to burst in Canada are exaggerated.

It says some of the evidence cited by correction hawks, including comparing home prices as a multiple of rental costs, don’t take into account historically low mortgage rates that keeps affordability steady. Citing Toronto, it notes that in 2013 mortgage payments consumed less than 20 per cent of average household income, the same as in 1993. (…)

Even when mortgage rates do start rising, the Conference Board believes it will happen gradually and over an extended period. For instance, it forecasts rates with only a gain of 200 basis points – two percentage points – by 2017 or 2018.

But at current low rates, the typical homeowner on a posted five-year rate will have paid down $42,104 principal on a $100,000 in mortgage debt, so affordability won’t be seriously affected once it comes time to renew at a higher rate.

Russian Capital Flight Surges Russia will see the largest capital outflow since the 2008 financial crisis in the first quarter of this year, the country’s deputy economy minister said, as relations with the West have sharply deteriorated since Moscow annexed Crimea this month.

Capital outflow in the first three months of 2014 will reach between $65 billion and $70 billion, Andrei Klepach said, slightly higher than for the whole of last year, and the highest level since the fourth quarter of 2008. Almost half of the quarterly outflow took place in March. (…)

The deputy minister said he expects there was no growth in Russia’s economy during the first quarter, despite an acceleration in annual growth in February to 0.3% from 0.1% in January.

“February is better than we had expected, but the growth is unstable and it is too early to talk about an exit from stagnation,” he said, adding that the economy’s growth during the first two months of the year was below the level needed to achieve the government’s target of 2.5% in 2014. (…)

Mr. Klepach said he expected no easing of the central bank’s monetary policy in the near future, as inflation is forecast to reach between 0.9% and 1.0% in March. Such a monthly rate suggests annual inflation of between 6.9% and 7.0%, well above the central bank’s target of 5%.

Just kidding This is called stagflation.

S&P Downgrades Brazil Credit Rating Standard & Poor’s on Monday cut its credit rating on Brazil to one notch above junk territory, underscoring the deterioration of the once-highflying economy.

Standard & Poor’s said the weak economic growth prospects, rising debt and a widening government deficit weakened the government’s ability to cope with external shocks.

The rating firm said that government debt is set to rise to as high as 45% of gross domestic product. The firm estimated that the government’s funding shortfall would grow to 3.9% this year from 3.2%.

Pointing up Internet groups face global tax crackdown OECD to tackle avoidance within digital economy

(…) Plans to “restore taxation” in the countries where digital companies make their sales and base their headquarters were set out on Monday in the first international response to the worldwide political row over the sector’s low tax payments. (…)

The findings have big implications for the e-commerce industry, which was worth more than $13tn in 2012 and accounted for nearly a fifth of companies’ turnover in European countries such as Finland, Hungary and Sweden. They will particularly affect India, Ireland, the US, Germany, the UK and China, which account for about 60 per cent of the world’s exports of information and communication technology services. (…)

The OECD is determined to eliminate structures popular with digital companies such as the “double Irish” which exploit differences between the US and Irish tax codes to move profits from Ireland to zero tax countries such as Bermuda. It said: “Structures aimed at artificially shifting profits to locations where they are taxed at more favourable rates, or not taxed at all, will be rendered ineffective by ongoing work in the context of the Beps project.”

Much of the impetus for the planned overhaul of international tax rules has been the dramatic growth of internet groups, now among the world’s largest companies, which can do billions of pounds worth of business in countries where they have little or no physical presence.

The report said “the fact that it is possible to generate a large quantity of sales without a taxable presence” raised questions about whether the current rules were fit for purpose in the digital economy. It put forward options for changing the rules determining whether a company has a taxable presence including instances where a company had “fully dematerialised digital activities”.

The OECD also highlighted the role played by intellectual property in digital companies saying under current rules, the legal ownership of intangible assets can easily be separated by the activities that led to their development. It has consulted on planned changes to rules concerning intangibles which will drastically reduce the profits that can be attributed to countries where there were no real activity, other than the legal ownership of intellectual property.

It is also considering other changes to the rules on “transfer pricing” – which determine how taxable profits are allocated between countries – that would make it easier to achieve a reasonable split of profits between countries in cases where conventional techniques did not give the correct result.

The Beps project is moving at a rapid pace in an attempt to reduce the pressure on governments to take uncoordinated unilateral measures. Comments on the discussion document must be lodged by April 14, before a September deadline for its completion.

Grad Students’ Loans Surge Report’s Findings Could Reframe Debate on Americans’ Growing Burden

The typical debt load of borrowers leaving school with a master’s, medical, law or doctoral degree jumped an inflation-adjusted 43% between 2004 and 2012, according to a new report by the New America Foundation, a left-leaning Washington think tank. That translated into a median debt load of $57,600 in 2012.

The increases were sharper for those pursuing advanced degrees in the social sciences and humanities, versus professional degrees such as M.B.A.s or medical degrees that tend to yield greater long-term returns. The typical debt load of those earning a master’s in education showed some of the largest increases, rising 66% to $50,879. It climbed 54% to $58,539 for those earning a master of arts.

By comparison, the typical student-debt burden of borrowers leaving school with a bachelor’s degree climbed 39% over the same period, to $27,000 in 2012.

The report, to be released Tuesday, shows how much of the increase in student debt over the past decade has been concentrated in a minority of students. In the 2012-13 academic year, graduate students accounted for about 1 in 6 student-loan recipients but between 30% and 40% of student debt extended by the federal government.

Policy makers and student advocates are increasingly concerned about students who leave school with high debt and can’t find work, and then fall behind on payments. That damages their credit and can limit purchases of homes, cars and other items that drive economic growth. (…)

Numerous factors are driving the increase in student debt. Many households lost savings and other assets during the recession, prompting more students to borrow. Schools have raised prices, citing cuts in state aid. And a greater share of students are pursuing advanced degrees than in previous generations to gain new skills and adapt to a modern economy.

The foundation’s report also points to a 2006 law that removed a limit on how much graduate students may borrow from the federal government. Before the change, graduate students—excluding medical students—could borrow no more than $138,500 total for their education and were limited in how much they could borrow annually. Now they can borrow up to the “cost of attendance,” a figure that includes tuition, books, transportation and living expenses. Undergraduates still face a lifetime borrowing cap, currently $57,500.

More graduate students are taking on debt loads approaching six figures. One in four borrowers who earned a graduate degree in 2012 owed at least $99,614 in student loans. Eight years earlier, the top quartile of borrowers owed $70,907 in 2012 dollars.

In 2012, one in 10 students leaving school with an advanced degree owed at least $153,000 in student debt, far above the previous borrowing limits. (…)

Pension Plans Brace for a One-Two Punch Just as companies thought their pension plans might be climbing out of the red, they are about to get hit with a double whammy of higher fees and ballooning obligations.

Not only do employers face a 52% increase by 2016 in the regulatory cost of administering their pension plans, but also a $150 billion surge in liabilities from longer-living retirees. (…)

The Society of Actuaries recently updated its mortality tables for the first time since 2000 to reflect the longer life spans of today’s retirees. Based on the update, the average man who turns 65 this year is expected to live to 86.6, up from 82.6 in 2000. Women are expected to live to 88.8, up from 85.2. That means companies will have to sock away more money to pay benefits years longer.

The new tables will be finalized later this year and become the standard auditors use to gauge corporate pension obligations. Mercer LLC estimates that corporate pension liabilities totaled about $2 trillion at the end of 2013. The increased life expectancy will add about 7% to the pension obligations on balance sheets, according to consulting firm Aon Hewitt. (…)