The enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it’s the illusion of knowledge (Stephen Hawking)

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so (Mark Twain)

Invest with smart knowledge and objective odds

THE DAILY EDGE (10 August 2018): Cost Push Inflation

U.S. Producer Prices Tame in July Rising oil prices, demand from U.S. consumers and businesses have helped push annual index higher

The producer-price index, a measure of the prices businesses receive for their goods and services, was flat in July from a month earlier, the Labor Department said Thursday.

A core measure of prices, which excludes the volatile food and energy categories, was up 0.1% in July from the prior month. (…)

On a monthly basis, prices for processed goods for intermediate demand were unchanged. That gauge is up nearly 7% from a year earlier, well outpacing prices for final demand, but matching the June rate. (…)

Sigh of relief as implied by the WSJ?

Hmmm…A closer look with the help of this Haver Analytics table actually reveals a continuation of the inflationary trends. The PPI for “Trade Services” dropped 0.8% in July reflecting “changes in margins received by wholesalers and retailers” as the BLS puts it. Excluding this, core PPI rose another 0.3% MoM and is up nearly 3.0% annualized in the last 3 months. Core goods prices are now up at a 3.6% annual rate while “Processed Goods”, flat last month, are up 6.8% YoY and 9.1% annualized in the last 3 months, indicating very strong price pressures in the goods production pipeline in spite of a rising dollar.

image

This next piece is definitely related:

  • Parts Shortages Crimp U.S. Manufacturers Factories in the U.S. are running short of parts. Suppliers of everything from engines to electronic components aren’t keeping up with a boom in U.S. manufacturing thanks to strong economic growth.

(…) As a result, some manufacturers are idling production lines and digesting higher costs. (…)

However, deliveries from suppliers have slowed for 22 consecutive months through July, according to the latest survey of U.S. manufacturers by the Institute for Supply Management. More than one-quarter of respondents said it took longer for materials to arrive in July than June. Machinery was the hardest-hit sector. (…)

Terex Corp. said its mobile-crane-making unit incurred a loss in the second quarter as parts shortages hurt efficiency at its plants. (…)

Machinery giant Caterpillar Inc. and power-equipment maker Eaton Corp. are among those struggling to keep up with orders as supply-chain kinks join labor shortages and inflated transport costs as threats to the sector’s recovery. Eaton last week cut financial guidance for its $2.5 billion hydraulics unit as a result.

Caterpillar said it is paying more for smaller or incomplete orders from suppliers that have struggled to meet demand. (…)

Oshkosh Corp. idled production of its mobile cranes because of parts shortages several times in the past quarter. (…) Boeing Co. recently had more than two dozen partly finished 737 airliners parked outside its Renton, Wash., assembly plant and an adjoining airport awaiting engines and other components. (…)

Some companies are stockpiling parts to head off future challenges, potentially exacerbating the supply pressures. (…)

Empty trucks are so hard to come by right now that Dean Foods Co. DF 0.47% , one of North America’s largest milk suppliers, cut its full-year earnings outlook in part because it simply can’t move its goods for anything close to what it expected to pay this year.

“Industry capacity for truck drivers remains extremely tight. This is driving third-party hauling rates to record levels, up 26% versus prior year,” Chief Executive Ralph Scozzafava said in a Tuesday call with investors. (…)

July is typically a slow month for shipping. But last month rates on the spot market, where shippers buy last-minute truck transportation, rose 29% for the most common type of big rig compared with July 2017, extending an unprecedented stretch of year-over-year gains to 17 straight months. It is the longest sustained period of pricing growth for truckers since the industry was deregulated in 1980, according to online freight marketplace DAT Solutions LLC. (…)

Some, including Kraft HeinzCo. , Sealed Air Corp. and Coca-Cola Co. , are raising prices to offset higher freight expensesand rising costs for raw materials.

“Nobody has a crystal ball, but if I had to place a bet I would say this is structural, not cyclical” change, said Lee Clair, managing partner at Transportation and Logistics Advisors LLC, a supply-chain-strategy consulting firm. (…)

Now, trucking companies swamped with demand are turning down freight and raising contract rates by 10% or more, with further increases expected next year. Many are boosting pay to recruit drivers in a tight labor market and say the price increases are justified after rates remained stagnant for many years.

Covenant Transportation Group Inc., a large trucking company based in Chattanooga, Tenn., said last month it had raised rates as much as 14% this year, and expects to see increases of 7% to 8% in 2019.

Knight Transportation, a division of Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc., the largest U.S. truckload company, said its revenue per loaded mile, a measure of pricing strength, soared 21% in the second quarter from the same quarter a year earlier. The company is getting customers that now are paying high spot-market rates to sign long-term contracts with rate increases to ensure they can get trucks. (…)

This is called stretched manufacturing and distribution capacity, to compound stretched manpower capacity.

And now, who is surprised by these strikes? (Some younger investors may not even know what a labor strike is).

(…) In Australia, roughly 1,500 employees at alumina refineries and bauxite mines owned byAlcoa Corp. AA -1.62% , the largest U.S. aluminum maker, are striking over pay and working conditions. That follows labor unrest at sites including mines run by Glencore PLC in South Africa and BHP Billiton Ltd. in Chile.

Strikes stoke volatility in global commodity markets, affecting the prices of products from guitar strings to semiconductors. Copper is especially prone to wild swings, given that supply is typically in line with global demand. Loss of production from a megapit such as Escondida in Chile or Grasberg in Indonesia, both hit by long walkouts last year, can swing a tight market into a shortfall.

Rising labor costs also threaten mining giants’ profits, just recovering from a deep downturn. Moody’s Investors Service said if workers strike again at Escondida—they voted in favor of a walkout this month—it could lead to a material fall in the BHP-led venture’s production and margins.

For the aluminum industry, the strikes in Australia are happening at an especially sensitive time.

Producers and buyers were early casualties of the Trump administration’s aggressive trade policy, as the U.S. imposed a 10% tariff on imported aluminum earlier in the year. Alcoa, which cited tariffs in cutting its profit outlook last month, on Monday asked for an exemption from tariffs on aluminum imported from Canada. (…)

Alcoa’s three refineries in Western Australia account for roughly 7% of global alumina supply, so the strike risks driving up prices, ultimately of the products from cars to beer cans that contain aluminum. (…)

Alumina’s price was already high before the strike, having risen about 35% in 2018, said Morgan Stanley analyst Susan Bates, an increase linked to earlier cuts at refineries in Brazil and China.

“Since alumina accounts for 40% of aluminum smelter cash costs, a price spike would be likely to put upward pressure on aluminum’s price,” Ms. Bates said.

Pointing up Now look carefully at this chart from KKR. Most of these tariffs have yet to hit the PPI and the CPI:

image

This morning:

CPI for all items rises 0.2% in July as shelter index rises

The Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) increased 0.2 percent in July on a seasonally adjusted basis after rising 0.1 percent in June, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Over the last 12 months, the all items index rose 2.9 percent before seasonal adjustment. (…)

The index for all items less food and energy rose 0.2 percent in July, the same increase as in May and June. Along with the shelter index, the indexes for used cars and trucks, airline fares, new vehicles, household furnishings and operations, and recreation all increased. The indexes for medical care and for apparel both declined in July.

The index for all items less food and energy rose 2.4 percent for the 12 months ending July; this was the largest 12-month increase since the period ending September 2008. The food index increased 1.4 percent over the last 12 months, and the energy index rose 12.1 percent.

Core CPI is up at a 2.4% annualized rate in the last 3 months and +2.8% a.r. in the last 6 months. Importantly, Goods prices have stopped falling and more importantly, core Services inflation is accelerating, up at a 3.2% annualized rate in the last 3 months and +3.6% a.r. in the last 6 months.

EARNINGS WATCH
Valuations Are Slipping Even as Stocks Hover Near Records Strong corporate earnings are making stocks look less expensive than they did before

(…) The S&P 500 trades at 18.8 times earnings over the past 12 months, a basement valuation that is lower than the market’s February trough, when the index’s valuation was around 19 times earnings, according to FactSet. At the S&P 500’s peak in January, the index traded at nearly 22 times earnings.

Strong corporate earnings are making stocks look less pricey than they did before. (…)

But by other measures, stocks still look expensive: The S&P 500 is currently trading in the 88th percentile of historical valuation, Goldman Sachs said in a recent report, while the median stock is at the 97th percentile. (…)

Here’s a 60-year chart:image

Normally, using trailing EPS is reasonably safe. However, it is of little help when a recession arrives because recessions crush earnings. I don’t know if an economic recession is coming soon but I strongly suspect that an earnings recession is looming, especially if the trade war expands.

And then there is the threat of lower multiples if inflation rise further.

So far, la vie est belle, with 79% of 452 companies reporting earnings beats averaging +5.2% with 9 out of 11 sectors beating by more than 5.0%. Trailing EPS are now $148.37 which I estimate is $152.70 pro forma the tax reform over the full 12 months. The pro forma trailing P/E is thus 18.6x while the Rule of 20 P/E is 21.0 (5% overvalued) using 2.4% inflation but it rises to 21.5 (9% overvalued) using 2.9% inflation.

Analysts remain very upbeat looking forward with Q3 EPS growth forecast at +22.5^ and Q4 at +20.5%. Post tax reform effects, EPS growth is still expected in the 9% range during the first half of 2019.

But corporations are increasingly warning negatively: as of Wednesday, 59.3% of pre-announcements were negative, up from 56.5% and 48.7% at the same time during Q3’17 and Q2’18 respectively. During the last 8 days: 1 positive and 16 negatives.

MORE ON SEASONALITY

This chart goes out 50 years:

Source: Market Ethos, Richardson GMP (via The Daily Shot)

ANOTHER CONCERN
Turkey Crisis Rattles Currency Markets, Pushes Dollar Higher The Turkish lira tumbled as much as 12% against the U.S. dollar, which rose to its strongest point in a year, as concerns about the health of Turkey’s financial system rippled through global markets.

The turmoil rattled a range of currencies, including the Russian ruble and Australian dollar, and knocked shares in several big European banks. The moves recalled previous episodes where trouble in countries such as China and Greece has fed wider market anxiety.

By early European trading hours Friday, the lira had pared some of its losses, but still stood 6% lower. (…)

While the ECB’s concern is not too high at this point, the central bank is monitoring how the fall in the lira in particular, and Turkey’s broader macroeconomic environment, could hurt eurozone banks, the person said.

Analysts and investors attributed the relentless pressure on the Turkish currency to growing concerns about a large stock of loans denominated in dollars and other currencies, and discord between Washington and Ankara. (…)

(…) The dollar’s rebound came after a broad decline in 2017, as growth outside the U.S. picked up. That lured investors into riskier bets: the MSCI Emerging Markets stock index gained over 30%.

This year kicked off in similar style. But then U.S. growth vaulted higher and momentum stalled elsewhere, sending the dollar on an unexpected upturn. It gained 5.5% against the euro and 4.2% against the yen in the second quarter; moves in emerging markets were even bigger, with the greenback up 17% against the Brazilian real and 16% against the South African rand. (…)

But even as the U.S. becomes the global disrupter, its assets have proved more alluring for investors. The dollar has kept its role as a magnet in times of doubt.

That is in part because the dollar remains so dominant. In the $5.1-trillion-a-day foreign-exchange market, the U.S. currency is on one side of 88% of all trades, according to the Bank for International Settlements’ 2016 survey. While its weight in foreign-exchange reserves has declined a little, it still accounts for 62.5% of the $10.4 trillion in allocated reserves identified by the International Monetary Fund. The euro, meanwhile, accounts for 20.4%. U.S. capital markets are the biggest and most liquid in the world, making the dollar attractive both to companies looking to raise finance and investors with cash to put to work. (…)

Over time, a stronger dollar can hurt U.S. corporate profits as exports become less competitive and foreign earnings are worth less translated back into dollars. While tax cuts have boosted economic growth, they have also raised the budget deficit, which may lead investors to start thinking about the scale of U.S. borrowing. (…)

Russia Boosts Global Oil Supply The world’s oil supply expanded in July on the back of surging Russian crude production, the International Energy Agency said, in a concrete sign of the unraveling of a nearly two-year-old OPEC-led agreement to curb output.

(…) the IEA said Russian crude and condensate production climbed by 150,000 barrels a day last month, to 11.21 million barrels a day. That “significantly sharper acceleration than expected” put output 265,000 barrels a day higher year-on-year and just 14,000 barrels a day lower than Russia’s October 2016 record high, the agency said.

Total global oil supply rose by 300,000 barrels a day in July, to reach 99.4 million barrels a day, boosted by Russian production, as well as higher output in Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates—two key members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries. (…)

However, the agency said that July output just within the OPEC oil-cartel was steady, at 32.18 million barrels a day, as a result of an unexpected drop in Saudi production. Despite expectations, Saudi production would rise by a self-described “measurable” increase of several hundred thousand barrels a day last month, production fell by 110,000 barrels a day, to 10.35 million barrels a day, as exports declined, according to the IEA. (…)

The IEA maintained its global oil demand outlook for 2018, reiterating demand growth of 1.4 million barrels a day, and projecting growth next year of around 1.5 million barrels a day. But “there are risks to the forecast if from escalating trade disputes and rising prices if supply is constrained,” the agency noted.

THE DAILY EDGE (31 July 2018):

PERSONAL INCOME AND OUTLAYS, JUNE 2018

Real disposable income growth has reaccelerated while core inflation has decelerated to +1.6% annualized in Q2.image

U.S. Pending Home Sales Rebound

The National Association of Realtors (NAR) reported that pending sales of existing homes increased 0.9% during June following two months of decline. Sales rose to an index level of 106.9 (2001=100) which remained down 2.5% y/y.  Sales were 5.4% below the peak in April of 2016. (…)

 large image large image

Chinese Economy Starts to Feel Tariff Impact China’s business activities faltered in July in the first official data to reflect the impact of U.S. tariffs, adding to signs that trade tensions have started to pinch economic growth.

The official manufacturing purchasing managers’ index fell to a five-month low of 51.2 from June’s 51.5, data released by the National Bureau of Statistics showed Tuesday. July’s reading came in slightly lower than economists’ expectations.

The import subindex of the official PMI slipped to a 23-month low, while the export subindex held steady thanks to a weaker yuan, said Julian Evans-Pritchard, an economist at Capital Economics. (…)

A subindex measuring production dropped to 53.0 from 53.6, while the new orders index fell to 52.3 from 53.2. (…)

The new imports and exports orders are in contraction mode at 49.6 and 49.8 respectively.

The Non-manufacturing PMI dropped from 55.0 to 54.0. Domestic slowdown on top of declining exports.

This next item is worrisome:

The headline FTCR China Real Estate Index fell 8.8 points month on month to 46.2 in July. This was below the average 50.7 reading of the previous 12 months but above last July’s 45.5.

Dr. Copper has not felt strong lately, must be a China syndrome:

  • The copper price has been weak in spite of declining inventories:

  • China IP is slowing:China Industrial Production
  • So is Japan:
  • And the E.U.:

Euro Area Industrial Production

  • The U.S. is the sole solid grower:

image

But for how long? Important question given the link with S&P 500 revenue growth as Ed Yardeni illustrates:

image

This 9.4% growth is clearly unsustainable but where is the floor?

WLI Growth since 2000

Eurozone economy records slowest growth in two years GDP expanded just 0.3% in second quarter amid fears of a trade-related slowdown
Euro area annual inflation up to 2.1%

Euro area annual inflation is expected to be 2.1% in July 2018, up from 2.0% in June, according to a flash estimate from Eurostat. Looking at the main components of euro area inflation, energy is expected to have the highest annual rate in July (9.4%, compared with 8.0% in June), followed by food, alcohol & tobacco (2.5%, compared with 2.7% in June), services (1.4%, compared with 1.3% in June) and non-energy industrial goods (0.5%, compared with 0.4% in June).

image

THE MID-TERMS

Turning out to be pretty significant on many things.

The Trump administration is considering bypassing Congress to grant a $100 billion tax cut to wealthy Americans by allowing taxpayers to account for inflation while determining capital gains tax liabilities, the New York Times reported on Monday.

The newspaper, quoting from an interview with Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, said the administration could change the definition of “cost” used to calculate capital gains, allowing taxpayers to adjust the value of an asset for inflation when it is sold.

Treasury officials were not immediately available to comment on the report, which said the administration has not concluded whether it has the authority to make such a change.

“If it can’t get done through a legislation process, we will look at what tools at Treasury we have to do it on our own and we’ll consider that,” the Times quoted Mnuchin as saying. “We are studying that internally, and we are also studying the economic costs and the impact on growth.”

EARNINGS WATCH

RBC says that so far,

65% of Small Caps and 76% of Mid Caps are beating consensus on EPS, with 70% and 65% beating consensus on sales. As is the case in Large Cap, EPS beats are hitting all time highs for the Russell 2000 while sales beats have stalled. Financials, Industrials, and Tech have dominated the Small/Mid Cap results so far.

In Europe, Thomson Reuters reports that

18Q2 earnings season is underway with 84 companies reporting last week ending July 27, 2018. Of the companies that reported this week, 44% beat EPS expectations and 37% missed EPS expectations.  In addition, 57% beat Revenue expectations and 40% missed Revenue expectations.

Meanwhile, in the USA:

The company now expects an adjusted per-share profit of $5.70 to $6, down from its prior forecast of $6.55 to $6.70. It said Monday that tariffs have hurt domestic and export prices on chicken and pork. Tyson also said domestic chicken demand has weakened because of an abundance of “relatively lower-priced” beef and pork.

“The combination of changing global trade policies here and abroad, and the uncertainty of any resolution, have created a challenging market environment of increased volatility, lower prices and oversupply of protein,” Chief Executive Tom Hayes said in prepared remarks. (…)

The maker of Jimmy Dean, Hillshire Farms and Ball Park products also warned that its sales in its current quarter have gotten off to a “slower than expected” start. (…)

Shares in Tyson fell 7.6% to $58.72, their sixth down day over the past seven trading sessions. Tyson’s stock price has fallen 28% this year.

Tyson’s announcement marks a change in direction from comments Mr. Hayes made in May, when he said the trade issues between the U.S. and China haven’t affected the company’s business. (…)

(…) Even so, shares in Caterpillar fell 2% to $139.75—a 5% swing from their pre-open level—as the company said it expects to pay more for materials as a result of tariffs this year. Caterpillar also flagged supply-chain constraints that occurred as it boosted production.

Caterpillar, based in Deerfield, Ill., said tariffs the Trump administration has imposed on some metal and component imports would increase its material costs by $100 million to $200 million over the rest of 2018. (…)

Caterpillar said that trade tensions haven’t affected its business in China.

Caterpillar said price increases that went into effect this month would help offset the higher costs. Other manufacturers have also said they are passing on higher costs by raising prices. (…)

In another sign of increased production levels, Caterpillar added 6,800 full-time workers in the second quarter [+7.2%!] compared with a year earlier, reaching a total of 101,600 employees at the end of June. (…)

SENTIMENT WATCH

The NYSE FANG+ Index—which comprises Facebook Inc., FB -2.19% Amazon.com Inc.,AMZN -2.09% Netflix Inc. and Google parent Alphabet Inc., GOOGL -1.82% as well as AppleInc., AAPL -0.56% Twitter Inc., TWTR -8.03% Tesla Inc., TSLA -2.36% Nvidia Corp.NVDA -3.13% and Chinese behemoths Alibaba Group Holding BABA -2.43% Ltd. and BaiduInc. BIDU -1.45% —slipped Monday as investors pulled back broadly from technology shares.

The index fell 2.8% Monday, slipping 10% below its June 20 record and entering correction territory for the second time this year—something that last happened three years ago, according to the WSJ Market Data Group. (…)

Goldman analysts, in a note, said that market breadth — a ratio that looks at how many stocks are rising compared with the number in a downtrend, as measured by the percentage below their 52-week high — wasn’t so narrow that investors should be concerned. While declines in breadth “have typically signaled large drawdowns” in the past, as investors lose confidence “in the increasingly expensive handful of crowded market leaders,” the current level isn’t at that kind of extreme. (…)

“Unlike past episodes of narrow market breadth, the earnings environment today appears healthy and broad-based.” (…)

While the top 10 S&P 500 companies have contributed 65% of the index’s year-to-date move, that same group only accounts for 20% of the index’s earnings. This is “roughly the same as in each of the last few years, and slightly below the 30-year average of 21%,” Goldman wrote. (…)

“Elevated valuations discourage investors in many sectors. However, the momentum and strong secular growth profiles of the largest market leaders have continued to attract investor assets,” they said. “While government policy remains a key risk, the pricing power of many tech firms should help insulate them from the margin risks posed by escalating trade conflict.”

Now, these next 2 items could make you sweat a little more:

According to the Stock Trader’s Almanac, August ranks as one of the weakest months of the year for major indexes, with steeper losses in midterm years, as the current one is.

(…) of the past 67 years, 36 have featured a positive August for the S&P 500. (…) Over the past 45 years, the Nasdaq has seen 25 positive Augusts and 21 negative ones. (…)

According to LPL Financial, August is the worst month of the year for the S&P 500 when one looks at the years when it is negative. If the index is negative for the month, it falls an average of 4.5%, the steepest drop of any month. In positive Augusts, it rises 3.2%, a gain that is roughly in the middle of the pack. (…)

MarketWatch also has this neat chart on “sell in May and Go Away”:

(…) “We must admit, the market sent some misleading signals over the last few weeks by limiting the damage to the broad indices when Netflix and Facebook missed. We believe this simply led to an even greater false sense of security in the market,” wrote the team of Morgan Stanley analysts, led by Michael Wilson, the firm’s chief U.S. equity strategist. Both Facebook and Netflix’s shares fell into bear-market territory on Monday, defined as a drop of at least 20% from a recent peak. (…)

Another interesting chart comes from John Hussman’s latest Market Comment, Extrapolating Growth:

(…) Investors should, but rarely do, anticipate the enormous growth deceleration that occurs once tiny companies in emerging industries become behemoths in mature industries. You can’t just look backward and extrapolate. In the coming years, investors should expect the revenue growth of the FAANG group to deteriorate toward a nominal growth rate of less than 10%, and gradually toward 4%.

The chart below shows the general process at work, reflecting the relationship between market saturation and subsequent revenue growth. Here, the points are plotted based on revenue at each date as a percentage of 2018 trailing 12-month revenues. The vertical axis shows annual revenue growth over the subsequent 2-year period. Clearly, Apple is the furthest along in terms of saturation.

Remember that the latest point on this chart for each company is two years ago. For all of these companies, current revenues represent the far right of the graph, and the corresponding value for subsequent growth will be available 2 years from now. Again, my expectation is that most of those growth rates will slow toward 10%, and gradually toward about 4% (which reflects the structural growth rate that can be expected for U.S. nominal GDP when one assumes a moderate pickup in productivity, inflation slightly over 2%, baked-in-the-cake demographics like population growth, and limited scope for a further cyclical decline in the rate of unemployment).

FAANG saturation and subsequent revenue growth

(…) growth rates are always a declining function of market penetration. Most strikingly, the growth rates begin to come down hard even at the point that a company hits 20-30% market penetration. Network effects accelerate the early growth, but also cause growth to hit the wall more abruptly. Replacement helps to accelerate the early growth rates too, but ultimately has much more effect on the sustainable level of sales than it has on long-term growth. In fact, if the replacement rate (the percentage of existing users that replace their product each year) is less than the adoption rate (the percentage of untapped prospects that are converted to new users), it’s very hard to keep the growth rate of sales from falling below the rate of economic growth. (…)

Several years ago, I observed “We’ve seen very rapid adoption rates, very high replacement, and very strong network effects in Apple’s products. All of this is an extraordinary achievement that reflects Steve Jobs’ genius. I suspect, however, that investors observe the rapid adoption and very high recent replacement rate of three very popular but semi-durable products, and don’t recognize how improbable it is to maintain these dynamics indefinitely. Despite great near-term prospects, within a small number of years, Apple will have to maintain an extraordinarily high rate of new adoption if replacement rates wane, simply to avoid becoming a no-growth company. That’s not a criticism of Apple, it’s just a standard feature of growth companies as their market share expands. It’s something that Cisco and Microsoft and every growth juggernaut encounters. Apple is now valued at 4% of U.S. GDP, but then, Cisco and Microsoft were each valued at 6% of GDP at the 2000 bubble peak. Not that things worked out well for investors who paid those valuations.”

Presently, Apple is valued at 5.1% of GDP, Amazon at 4.8%, Alphabet (Google) at 4.6%, Facebook at 3.3%, and Netflix at 0.8% of GDP. That’s a total market capitalization of nearly 20% of GDP across 5 stocks. It’s worth remembering that historically, the pre-bubble norm for market capitalization to GDP, adding up every nonfinancial company in the stock market, was only about 60%. At secular lows like 1974 and 1982, the ratio fell to 30% of GDP – for the entire market. (…)

FYI
  • The Model 3 social media sentiment has soured (The Daily Shot)

Source: Goldman Sachs, @bySamRo