The enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it’s the illusion of knowledge (Stephen Hawking)

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so (Mark Twain)

Invest with smart knowledge and objective odds

THE DAILY EDGE (5 December 2017)

U.S. Business activity growth eases in November

November survey data signalled a slower rate of expansion in business activity across the US service sector. Although output growth eased slightly to a five-month low, the upturn in new business accelerated and was solid overall. Employment growth meanwhile reached a three-month peak, which helped alleviate capacity pressures. In line with this, backlog accumulation softened to a five-month low. Inflationary pressures intensified with both input prices and output charges rising at quicker paces. The latest survey also indicated a fall in business confidence to the joint-lowest since February.

The seasonally adjusted IHS Markit U.S. Services Business Activity Index registered 54.5 in November, down from 55.3 in October. Although the latest index reading indicated a slightly weaker output expansion, the overall rate of growth was strong by recent standards nonetheless. Anecdotal evidence suggested that increases in activity were due to greater new order volumes and robust client demand.

image

New orders received by service providers continued to rise in November, with the pace of expansion accelerating from October’s six-month low. Panellists attributed the improvement in new orders to more favourable demand conditions and the acquisition of new clients.

Alongside an increase in new orders, firms reported that greater business requirements had led to employment growth. Job creation accelerated slightly to a solid rate that was the fastest in three months. Moreover, the latest upturn in payroll numbers was above the long-run series average.

Capacity pressures softened for the fourth successive month, and the overall accumulation of unfinished business was only fractional. Furthermore, the growth in outstanding business was the weakest since June.

Average prices charged for services increased further in November, with the rate of inflation accelerating. Panellists stated the rise was due to higher input costs which were passed on to clients. Cost burdens faced by service providers rose at a strong rate that was slightly below the series trend. Panel members noted that the increase in input costs was primarily due to higher goods prices.

The final seasonally adjusted IHS Markit U.S. Composite PMI™ Output Index fell to 54.5 in November, down from 55.2 in October. Softer upturns in both the manufacturing and service sector led to a weaker overall output expansion. Moreover, the latest composite index figure indicated the slowest growth in private sector activity since June.

image

Chris Williamson, Chief Business Economist at IHS Markit:

(…) Mid-way through the fourth quarter, the surveys are still pointing to a reasonable GDP growth rate of approximately 2.5%.

The surveys’ employment indices are meanwhile pointing to solid non-farm payroll growth of circa 200,000 as companies continue to take on staff in encouraging numbers to meet rising order books.

Disappointingly, optimism about the year ahead deteriorated as companies grew increasingly cautious about the outlook for 2018, suggesting risk aversion may start to rise, which could hit hiring and investment. However, for now, businesses generally remain in expansion mode and the upturn shows few signs of losing momentum to any significant extent.

In terms of prices, the upturn continues to show signs of gradually feeding through to higher inflationary pressure. Average selling prices for goods and services showed one of the largest increases recorded over the past four years, linked to rising cost pressures.

Eurozone economic expansion strengthens as growth accelerates across ‘big-four’ nations

The final IHS Markit Eurozone PMI® Composite Output Index posted 57.5 in November, up from 56.0 in October and unchanged from the earlier flash estimate. (…)

image

Manufacturing production rose at the quickest pace in almost seven years in November and the headline index from the manufacturing survey – the Manufacturing PMI – posted a level bettered only once in its 20-year history.

The eurozone service sector also registered quicker output growth in November. Business activity rose to one of the greatest extents seen over the past six-and-a-half years.

imageThe acceleration in the pace of economic expansion was broad-based across the countries covered, with pick-ups signalled in the ‘big-four’ nations and Ireland. France stayed at the top of the growth rankings for the second month, with its rate of increase hitting a six-and-a-half year record. (… )

Inflows of new orders improved at the quickest pace since February 2011. This was led by near-record growth of manufacturing new work, including an unprecedented rise in new export orders. Strengthening demand led to increased backlogs of work, encouraging firms to raise employment. Job creation hit a 17-year peak, with faster increases signalled in Germany, France, Spain and Ireland.

Price pressures intensified in November, with inflation of both input costs and output charges at or near to six-and-a-half year highs. (… )

The eurozone service economy continued to make solid progress in November. Business activity growth accelerated to a six-month high, as companies raised output in response to increased new order inflows and backlogs of work. At 56.2 in November, up from 55.0 in October, the final IHS Markit Eurozone PMI® Services Business Activity Index indicated an increase in output for the fifty-second successive month. The final index posting was unchanged from the earlier flash estimate.

The pace of increase in new business continued to hold steady at September’s six-month high. This tested capacity – backlogs of work rose at the quickest pace since March 2011 – and encouraged further job creation. Employment increased to the greatest extent in just over ten years. (…)

Input cost inflation rose to a nine-month high, as faster increases in Italy, France and Spain offset decelerations in Germany and Ireland. Meanwhile, output charge inflation across the euro area service sector held steady at October’s seven-month high.

Chris Williamson, Chief Business Economist at IHS Markit:

Comparisons with GDP indicate that the survey data for the fourth quarter so far are consistent with the eurozone expanding by 0.8%, with growth rates of 0.9% and 0.7% signalled for Germany and France respectively. Spain looks set for a 0.75% expansion while Italy could see GDP rise by 0.4-0.5%.

The survey data therefore suggest that business as a whole in the eurozone has so far been largely unaffected by political uncertainty in many countries, notably Germany and Spain, once again defying widespread expectations that growth would slow as uncertainty leads to more risk averse decision making. So far, the strengthening of the euro also shows no discernible impact on exports. (…)

Given the strength of order book growth and hiring, as well as the elevated level of business optimism, the eurozone should start the New Year on a solid footing. If survey data remain buoyant in December, expect to see 2018 growth forecasts revised higher. In terms of prices, core inflation has so far remained subdued, but the PMI price gauges and indicators of depleted capacity suggest that inflationary pressures will pick up next year.

China Composite PMI shows business activity rising at quickest pace since August

The Caixin China Composite PMI™ data (which covers both manufacturing and services) indicated that growth momentum improved slightly in November. Although the Composite Output Index rose from October’s 16-month low of 51.0 to 51.6, the latest figure pointed to only a modest upturn in business activity that remained weaker than the series average.

Data broken down by sector indicated that business activity growth improved across both the manufacturing and service sectors during November. In the manufacturing sector, the pace of increase picked up from October’s four-month low, but remained moderate overall. Services companies meanwhile saw the quickest rise in activity for three months, though growth was likewise modest. The latter was illustrated by the seasonally adjusted Caixin China General Services Business Activity Index increasing from 51.2 to 51.9 in November.

image

Services companies signalled a sustained rise in new work during November. As was the case for activity, the rate of expansion improved to a three-month record, with a number of firms indicating that new client wins and promotional activities had helped to lift overall sales. New business also increased at manufacturers, though the rate of expansion softened since October. At the composite level, growth in new orders edged up to its strongest since August.

Greater operational requirements contributed to a further rise in service sector staff numbers midway through the final quarter of 2017. Though modest, the rate of job creation was the quickest seen since August. In contrast, manufacturing firms continued to register lower workforce numbers, with the rate of reduction the most marked in three months. Staff hiring at services companies offset another fall in manufacturing payroll numbers, so that employment remained stagnant at the composite level. (…)

Rates of cost inflation remained markedly different between manufacturing and services companies. Input prices faced by service providers rose only modestly during November. At the same time, cost burdens rose sharply across the manufacturing sector, despite the rate of inflation edging down to a three-month low. Higher raw material costs were commonly cited as a key factor driving up input costs. As a result, composite input prices continued to rise markedly in the latest survey period.

In line with the trend for input costs, services companies raised their prices charged at a modest pace in November. Nonetheless, the rate of increase was the quickest seen since July 2015. Manufacturers meanwhile raised their factory gate prices at a solid rate, with a number of surveyed firms mentioning the pass through of greater input costs to clients. Overall, composite output charges rose at a moderate pace that was slightly faster than that seen in October. (…)

Ninja The Coming Aluminum War

The Commerce Department last week announced a “dumping” investigation into Chinese aluminum imports. That’s one more sign that the Trump Administration is heading toward a major escalation in trade conflict that would hurt Americans.

Dumping investigations usually start when a company petitions the government, but Tuesday’s action was self-initiated, the first such case in 25 years. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross told industry executives that this will accelerate the Administration’s fight against “dumped” goods. In October the Commerce Department imposed duties of 97% to 162% on Chinese-made aluminum foil. (…)

The new Commerce investigation concerns common alloy aluminum sheet, which is crucial for industries from construction to home appliances. The U.S. uses 26 billion pounds a year, but domestic makers meet only 8% of that demand.

Tariffs would raise costs for U.S. manufacturers, which would likely lose more jobs than they’d create in the aluminum industry. That’s what happened when George W. Bush raised steel tariffs in 2002.

Higher prices on $600 million worth of aluminum may not have a major effect on the U.S. economy, but it signals the Administration’s willingness to start a trade war. If the Commerce investigation results in anti-dumping duties, Beijing will have a strong case to take to the WTO that could allow China to impose new duties on American goods.

Another Commerce investigation begun in April will determine whether aluminum and steel imports are a national security threat under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act. That decision, expected after the U.S. tax debate is finished, could give Mr. Trump significant latitude to raise tariffs.

In this case Mr. Ross’s target would be American allies, since China didn’t even break into the top 10 sources of U.S. steel imports in the first half of 2017. Canada provides 17% of U.S. imports, and Germany, South Korea, Taiwan and Japan are all bigger suppliers than China. Hitting their companies would invite retaliation and undermine U.S. foreign policy.

European Union officials have already said that U.S. farm products would be a priority target in a trade war. In July American farmers wrote to the White House warning about tariff blowback. U.S. officials might consider what’s more important: $600 million in aluminum or $160 billion in agriculture exports?

Tariffs on Canadian lumber have already pushed U.S. lumber prices up nearly 30% in 2017, a year when housing starts were down. (Chart from CalculatedRisk)

Money Money The U.S. companies with the most cash parked overseas

Just 30 of the largest companies in the S&P 500 index have almost $900 billion of cash stashed overseas, based on company data and estimates compiled by Credit Suisse. (…) Companies park their money in foreign subsidiaries to avoid having to pay the 35% U.S. corporate tax rate. If Republicans pass their tax overhaul legislation, companies would be able to bring that money back at a much lower rate (10% in the Senate bill, 14% in the House).

Source: Credit Suisse, @chrisdieterich (via The Daily Shot)

  • This table provides a summary comparison of the House and the Senate tax bills. (The Daily Shot)

Source: WSJ.com, h/t Paul Menestrier; Read full article

(…) Under the Senate version of the tax bill, most of the individual income tax cuts are set to become effective in 2018, while the corporate tax cuts become effective in 2019. And according to that Tax Policy Center analysis, 75% of American tax units* would get a tax cut under the Senate tax bill in 2019 — the first year most of the cuts are in full effect.

The average tax savings for a tax unit in the middle-income quintile — that is, reporting income between $49,600 and $87,400 — would be $840.

But there’s a key caveat. Much of that savings is attributable to the cut in corporate income tax. Individuals benefit from a corporate income tax cut to the extent they have investments. TPC also believes they benefit because a portion of the corporate income tax — 20%, in TPC’s estimation — is borne by workers in the form of lower wages.

(…) by 2027, the Tax Policy Center found 48% of tax filers would face tax increases, while only 31% would get a tax cut, relative to current law. This is because most of the personal income tax cuts in the bill are set to expire after a few years, in order to comply with complex Senate budget rules.

Future Congresses may act to avert many of these tax increases by extending the tax cuts — though doing so would add even more to the federal debt than the $1 trillion-plus set to be added by this bill. (…)

(…) Total debt held by the public is forecast to rise to $17.52 trillion in 2022, from $14.92 trillion in fiscal 2017.

U.S. net interest costs rose to $274 billion in fiscal 2017, the most on record, according to the government’s fiscal 2018 budget.

They are projected to increase to $528 billion by 2022, which would account for 10.9 percent of total outlays, up from 6.8 percent this year, the budget shows, making interest costs the fastest-growing major expense over that period. (…)

index.html
 
U.S. investors overweight in stocks despite market fears: study Three out of four U.S. investors age 40 and older worry about a correction that will eventually end the long-running bull market in stocks, yet most refuse to head for the exits.

(…) Sixty-nine percent of older investors remain heavily exposed to equities, according to a national study released on Tuesday by Global Atlantic Financial Group, potentially leaving many ill-positioned for the inevitable downturn. (…)

52 percent said they believed the stock market could sustain continued growth for five years without a downturn of 10 percent or more. (…)

Forty-six percent of investors said they found equities and fixed income investments equally appealing, while 32 percent preferred equities and 22 percent preferred fixed income. (…)

U.S. Postal Service Given Green Light to Speed Up Price Increases The federal agency that oversees the U.S. Postal Service gave permission for the service to speed up its pricing increases over the next five years, an effort to shore up its finances as the amount of mail it delivers has plunged

THE DAILY EDGE (8 February 2017)

U.S. JOLTS: U.S. Labor Market Activity Deteriorates Slightly

(…) The actual number of job openings eased 0.1% (+4.2% y/y) to 5.501 million, down from the April high of 5.845 million. Private-sector openings improved 1.4% (4.8% y/y) to 5.017 million, and increased 4.8% y/y. (…)

The number of hires increased 0.8% (-2.8% y/y) to 5.252 million. Private-sector hiring improved 1.6% (-2.2% y/y)

 large image large image

U.S. Consumer Credit Growth Eases M/M and Y/Y
 large image large image

Most of the credit outstanding is at floating rates…

Firms Slash Interest Tab in $100 Billion Refinancing Blitz

(…) The wave is being propelled by outsize investor demand for bank loans, floating-rate debt investments that are prized because they tend to perform well in rising-rate environments. The red-hot loan market has enabled many corporations to demand that lenders cut rates or face losing the business to a rival, a sign of how easy financing is enabling large firms to get advantageous terms in debt markets. (…)

Investors have poured $17 billion into loan mutual funds since Sept. 1, with $7.6 billion coming in December alone, according to data from Lipper Inc. It is the biggest such inflow since 2013, during the “Taper Tantrum” when the Fed’s plan to reduce stimulus fueled a surge into loan funds.

With few new loans to buy, fund managers who received new money from investors are scrambling to buy existing loans, pushing prices higher and spreads down. Companies and their investment bankers saw the opportunity to refinance and pounced. (…)

Total repricings since the start of October amount to $222 billion, representing 24% of all outstanding leveraged loans, according to LevFin Insights. Firms negotiated an average interest reduction of 0.59 percentage point.

Even new loans, which companies are typically prohibited from refinancing for at least six months, have been caught up in the repricing wave. (…)

But even deals previously deemed risky have been drawing strong demand. When talent agency William Morris Endeavor Entertainment LLC and several private-equity firms used $1.8 billion of leveraged loans for their buyout of Ultimate Fighting Championship in August, the deal drew fire from bank regulators for being too aggressive. The Fed told arrangers Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Deutsche Bank AG that the deal might violate guidelines about how much debt could be used for the purchase, The Wall Street Journal has reported.

Despite the warnings, UFC persuaded holders of its loans in January to reprice lower by 0.75 percentage point, using the markets arms of one of its owners, KKR & Co., to step in for the banks and arrange the transaction.

U.S. Trade Deficit Declines
 large image

BTW:

(The Daily Shot)

US Economic Confidence Index Hit New High in January

Americans’ confidence in the U.S. economy remained strong in January. Gallup’s U.S. Economic Confidence Index averaged +11, the highest monthly average in Gallup’s nine-year trend. However, the index has been slightly lower so far in February.

Gallup's U.S. Economic Confidence Index

Gallup's U.S. Economic Confidence Index by Political Party

In January, 31% of Americans rated the economy as “excellent” or “good,” while 21% said it was “poor,” resulting in a current conditions score of +10 — marking the highest monthly reading for this component since 2008.

The economic outlook component also reached a new high score of +11 in January. This score was the result of 52% of Americans saying economic conditions in the country were “getting better,” while 41% said they were “getting worse.”

Gallup's U.S. Economic Confidence Index Components

SYNCHRONIZED ACCELERATION?
A Mismatch of Home Buyers and Sellers Points to Pain This Year

(…) Across the U.S., 27% of online home searches in the fourth quarter were for starter homes, but only 21% of listings were in that price range, according to Trulia, a real-estate information company.

Meanwhile, just 44% of searches were for luxury listings, while 55% of home listings were priced at the high end.

The findings point to a critical imbalance in the market: There is a significant and growing shortage of lower-priced homes and a glut of high-end ones.

The result is likely to be swiftly rising prices at the low end and challenges for first-time buyers, and sluggish price increases and lingering listings at the top end. (…)

EARNINGS WATCH
  • 310 companies (75.8% of the S&P 500’s market cap) have reported. Earnings are beating by 3.4% (3.0% ex-Financials) while revenues are surprising by 0.3%.
  • Expectations are for revenue, earnings, and EPS growth of 4.2%, 6.1%, and 8.2%, respectively. (6.0% ex-Financials)
  • EPS is on pace for 9.0%, assuming the current beat rate for the remainder of the season. This would be 7.5% excluding the benefit of easy comps at AIG and GS. (RBC)

In all, three quarters of the way, this is a pretty good quarter although a lot of consumer-centric companies have yet to report.

image

GOP Plan to Overhaul Tax Code Gets Held Up at the Border A border-adjustment tax—the linchpin of the House Republicans’ tax overhaul plan—is splitting the business world into competing camps. Opposing it are retailers, car dealers, toy manufacturers, oil refiners and others that say it would drive up import costs and force them to raise prices.

(…) House Republicans want to drop the top individual tax rate to a 25-year low, cut the corporate tax rate to the lowest since 1939 and kill the 101-year-old estate tax.

Those are the politically easy choices, the ones Republicans argue would boost economic growth and simplify taxes. If that is all they sought, they could copy their 2001 playbook, push through tax cuts with a 10-year expiration date and declare victory.

Mr. Brady says Republicans won’t do that. They are rethinking fundamental tax rules for businesses and individuals, trying to improve investment incentives and remove tax provisions they say distort economic choices. That would affect every industry and income group, inevitably creating winners and losers. (…)

The Republicans’ task is harder than in 1986, when they worked with Democrats to scrub the tax code. This time, many Democrats are poised to dismiss the GOP plans as unacceptable tax cuts for rich individuals tied to untested changes for businesses. A memo from Senate Democratic tax staffers in December called the House plan “highly regressive and fiscally irresponsible.” (…)

The argument for border adjustment hinges in part on how currency markets will respond. Economists expect border adjustment to increase the dollar’s value as much as 25%, citing similar currency moves when other nations introduced border-adjusted value-added taxes.

As a result, proponents say, an importer would pay more taxes but the stronger dollar would make it cheaper to bring products into the U.S., theoretically leaving the importer no worse off. Exporters could be hit by a stronger dollar—it would make their products more expensive in foreign currencies—but benefit from lower tax bills. (…)

Tax experts are puzzling over how to describe who wins and loses from border adjustment. One thing is clear, economists say: If the dollar goes up 25%, U.S. holders of foreign assets—including pension funds and endowments—would suffer a one-time loss in wealth of more than $2 trillion.

There is also global uncertainty: Other countries may retaliate, either by border-adjusting their corporate taxes or by challenging the U.S. plan at the World Trade Organization as too tilted toward American producers. (…)

Republicans have said they are considering pushing a tax plan through the Senate by a simple majority. With a 52-48 Senate margin, they have little maneuvering room. At least seven GOP senators have expressed concerns about border adjustment, including Utah’s Mike Lee, Arkansas’s John Boozman, Georgia’s David Perdue and Texas’ John Cornyn. (…)

POLITICS Sick smile

A reader wrote: “I do not remember so much coverage of Obama as there is of Trump?”

My reply:

“ you are probably right. But there was never an Obama hope factor embedded in valuations as there is now for Trump.

I am not trying to do any kind of job on Trump, just trying to either justify the hype or find the trigger that will deflate it in financial markets. Note that much of the “Trump coverage” are headliners with links to the full articles which readers can elect to read or not.

There is nothing truly political in my posts but politics are currently driving markets and I must monitor and weigh its impact vs other more traditional factors such as profits, inflation, interest rates and economic momentum. All financial.

In truth, I tend to like mavericks. I was a huge Reagan fan (even though he was actually pretty straight compared with Trump). I also read a lot about Teddy Roosevelt and Andrew Jackson. I initially thought that Obama had many attributes that could make him a great president. He failed miserably from my lens although that did not prevent equity markets to triple during his presidency. All financial!”

Seth Klarman also does not get political in his writing except when it impacts the financial world:

A Quiet Giant of Investing Weighs In on Trump

(…) Exuberant investors have focused on the potential benefits of stimulative tax cuts, while mostly ignoring the risks from America-first protectionism and the erection of new trade barriers,” he wrote.

“President Trump may be able to temporarily hold off the sweep of automation and globalization by cajoling companies to keep jobs at home, but bolstering inefficient and uncompetitive enterprises is likely to only temporarily stave off market forces,” he continued. “While they might be popular, the reason the U.S. long ago abandoned protectionist trade policies is because they not only don’t work, they actually leave society worse off.”

In particular, Mr. Klarman appears to believe that investors have become hypnotized by all the talk of pro-growth policies, without considering the full ramifications. He worries, for example, that Mr. Trump’s stimulus efforts “could prove quite inflationary, which would likely shock investors.”

And he appears deeply concerned about a swelling national debt that he suggests could undermine the economy’s growth over the long term.

“The Trump tax cuts could drive government deficits considerably higher,” Mr. Klarman wrote. “The large 2001 Bush tax cuts, for example, fueled income inequality while triggering huge federal budget deficits. Rising interest rates alone would balloon the federal deficit, because interest payments on the massive outstanding government debt would skyrocket from today’s artificially low levels.” (…)

“The erratic tendencies and overconfidence in his own wisdom and judgment that Donald Trump has demonstrated to date are inconsistent with strong leadership and sound decision-making.” (…)

“The big picture for investors is this: Trump is high volatility, and investors generally abhor volatility and shun uncertainty,” he wrote. “Not only is Trump shockingly unpredictable, he’s apparently deliberately so; he says it’s part of his plan.”

While Mr. Klarman clearly is hoping for the best, he warned, “If things go wrong, we could find ourselves at the beginning of a lengthy decline in dollar hegemony, a rapid rise in interest rates and inflation, and global angst.” (…)

Mr. Klarman is a registered independent and has given money to politicians from both parties. (…)

Klarman seems to have very similar concerns as those expressed in my Jan. 9 post The Lady and the Trump.