The enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it’s the illusion of knowledge (Stephen Hawking)

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so (Mark Twain)

Invest with smart knowledge and objective odds

THE DAILY EDGE: 19 FEBRUARY 2021

U.S. Initial Jobless Insurance Claims Rise Modestly but Prior Week Revised Up 55,000

Initial claims for unemployment insurance rose 13,000 in the week ended February 13 to 861,000. The previous week, initially reported at 793,000, was revised to 848,000. Thus, the decline then of 19,000 evolved into an increase of 36,000. The four-week moving average of initial claims eased to 833,250, a decrease of 3,500 and a five-week low. The Action Economics Forecast Survey expected 775,000 for the latest week.

Initial claims for the federal Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (PUA) program climbed to 516,299, up 174,427 on the week and the largest number since September 19. The PUA program covers individuals such as the self-employed who are not included in regular state unemployment insurance.

Continuing claims for regular state unemployment insurance decreased to 4.494 million in the week ended February 6 from 4.558 million in the prior week, which was revised from 4.545 million; the not seasonally adjusted series in the February 6 week fell to 5.003 million from 5.157 million. Continuing PUA claims for the week of January 30 decreased to 7.685 million from 7.943 million in the prior week. The Pandemic Emergency Unemployment Compensation (PEUC) claims declined to 4.061 million in the January 30 week from 4.779 million the week before. This program covers people who were unemployed before COVID but exhausted their state benefits and are now eligible to receive benefits through March 14, 2021.

The total number of all state, federal and PUA and PEUC continuing claims fell by 1.326 million to 18.340 million in the January 30 week from 19.666 million the week before. This grand total is not seasonally adjusted.

U.S. Housing Starts Decline in January

Strength in home building waned last month. Housing starts declined 6.0% (-2.3% y/y) during January to 1.580 million (AR) from 1.680 million in December, revised from 1.669 million. November starts were revised to 1.553 million from 1.578 million. The Action Economics Forecast Survey expected 1.658 million starts in January.

Starts of single-family homes declined 12.2% (+17.5% y/y) to 1.162 million from 1.323 million in December, revised from 1.338 million. Offsetting this decline was a 17.1% increase (-33.4% y/y) in multi-family starts to 418,000 from 357,000 in December, revised from 331,000. It was the highest level of multi-family starts in six months.

A 10.4% January increase (22.5% y/y) in building permits to 1.881 million suggests that weakness in housing starts overall will not be long-lived. The January level of permits was the highest since May 2006, increasing from December’s 1.704 million. Permits to build single-family homes rose 3.8% (29.9% y/y) to 1.269 million following a 7.6% December gain. Permits to build multi-family homes surged 27.2% (9.5% y/y) to 612,000 from a little-revised 481,000 in December.

fredgraph - 2021-02-19T073306.959

CONSUMER WATCH

Chinese Consumers Were Big Spenders During the Lunar New Year Holiday Chinese consumers opened up their wallets over the weeklong Lunar New Year holiday, energizing a domestic retail and service sector that has proved a stubborn laggard in China’s economic recovery.

Consumption at major retailers and restaurants over the seven-day holiday, from Feb. 11 to Feb. 17, hit 821 billion yuan, China’s Commerce Ministry said Wednesday. That figure, equivalent to about $127 billion, represented a 29% jump from last year’s pandemic-disrupted holiday, and a 4.9% increase from the same period in 2019, long before the coronavirus swept across China.

The rise in spending came as tens of millions of Chinese residents heeded authorities’ call to stay put during the Lunar New Year holiday because of the coronavirus, denting what is traditionally the busiest travel season of the year. Instead, they redirected their disposable income to gifts, food, entertainment and other sectors that suffered during the height of the pandemic last year. (…)

As a result of the admonitions from authorities, travel by rail, air, road and other modes of transport fell 77% from pre-coronavirus levels and economists began adjusting forecasts for consumption to take a hit more broadly.

Instead, the latest official data suggest that the stay-in-place policies—combined with the cash handouts and a successful taming of the latest wave of infections—helped resuscitate consumption by keeping people in big cities and freeing them up to splurge on meals and entertainment.

Across China’s 10 biggest cities, official data showed consumer foot traffic at shopping malls was triple last year’s levels, though still below 2019 levels.

Chinese consumers’ willingness to spend powered a surge in China’s box-office revenues, which set a holiday record of 7.5 billion yuan, equivalent to $1.1 billion. Less than two months into the new year, 2021’s box office revenues are already near half of 2020’s full-year total, China’s Commerce Ministry said. (…)

Even with cinemas restricted to occupancy of 75%—and just 50% in big cities like Beijing and Shanghai—the number of Lunar New Year moviegoers surpassed 2019’s numbers by 22%, according to analysts at investment bank China International Capital Corp. , though they also warned that fewer Hollywood blockbusters this year could hurt summer box-office receipts.

Another beneficiary of the Lunar New Year restrictions were jewelry and fashion outlets, which reported year-over-year sales jumps of 161% and 107%, respectively, during the weeklong holiday, according to the Commerce Ministry.

Those outlets were boosted by Valentine’s Day, a Western holiday that is increasingly celebrated by younger Chinese, and which fell during this year’s Lunar New Year. (…)

Shanghai’s commerce bureau, which surveyed more than 100 restaurants in the affluent coastal city, reported a 79% jump in Lunar New Year sales compared with last year’s holiday. (…)

David Rosenberg is a vocal bear, primarily with his call for weak consumer spending post normalization and continued lowflation. But recent data seem to be shaking his confidence somewhat. About whether Americans will keep saving their stimmies, Rosie notes that:

Despite the fact that consumer sentiment in February sagged to a six-month low, households wasted no time in spending the renewed giveaway from Uncle Sam. Thing is —from our back-of-the-envelope calculations, 86% of the total stimulus has already been spent. At the same time, more help in terms of government fiscal stimulus is coming our way, and double what was doled out in late December.

And, based on our estimate of the direct impact of the stimulus checks and what organic income seems to have done in January, it looks to us as if the personal savings rate plunged from 13.7% to 9.8%. If you recall, our “new normal”precautionary savings equilibrium is around 10%, and we are pretty well there (for now).

The fact that Americans would have already used 86% of their January rescue checks goes against the idea that they want to keep high precautionary savings. The next, even larger, “rescue checks” could come in March or April.

On inflation, he now admits that “We do have some cyclical pressures, don’t get me wrong —but each time they come and they go.” Not if rescue checks are spent.

FLASH PMIs

Eurozone service sector weakening cushioned by manufacturing gains

Eurozone business activity fell for a fourth successive month in February, driven lower by a further slump in the service sector as virus-related restrictions continued to affect many businesses. The service sector downturn was offset, however, by faster manufacturing growth, led by Germany. Business expectations also improved to the highest for nearly three years as companies looked ahead to vaccine roll-outs allowing an easing of restrictions.

Rising price pressures were evident, however, as surging demand for raw materials led to near-record supply constraints, driving manufacturing input prices up at a rate not seen for almost ten years.

The headline flash IHS Markit Eurozone Composite PMI® edged higher from 47.8 in January to 48.1 in February. By remaining below 50.0, the latest reading indicated a fourth consecutive monthly contraction of business activity, but also registered a slight easing in the rate of decline compared to January.

image

Despite the rise in the PMI, the average reading of 47.9 for the first quarter so far is marginally lower than the average of 48.1 seen in the fourth quarter of last year. The sustained downturn therefore hints at a further deterioration in the economy as measures to control the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continue to disrupt business activity across the region.

Importantly, however, the last four months have seen the PMI remain far higher than during the initial months of the pandemic in the spring of last year, suggesting that the economic impact of the second wave of virus infections has so far been much less severe than during the first wave.

The deterioration in output was driven by the service sector, where activity fell at the fastest rate since November, registering the second-steepest fall since last May largely in response to COVID-19 related restrictions. Steepening declines were seen in Germany and France, though the rest of the region as a whole reported some cooling in the downturn compared to January.

In contrast to the further weakening of service sector activity, manufacturing output growth accelerated to the fastest since October, and the second-fastest in three years, buoyed by surging inflows of news business. Especially strong manufacturing growth was again recorded in Germany, though France also saw production return to modest growth after a brief hiatus in January and the rest of the eurozone enjoyed the strongest factory production gains since last August.

The strength of its manufacturing sector meant overall business activity rose in Germany, although at 51.3 (up only modestly from 50.8 in January) the composite index registered only a marginal expansion due to the offsetting impact of weaker services.

At 45.2, down from 47.7, the equivalent composite index for France meanwhile signalled the steepest deterioration since November due to the faster service sector downturn. Business activity also declined across the rest of the eurozone as a whole, albeit at a reduced rate.

image

The stronger growth of eurozone manufacturing output occurred despite increasingly widespread shortages of inputs, demand for which continued to outstrip supply in many cases. The amount of inputs bought by manufacturers rose at the sharpest rate for just over three years, putting further pressure on supply chains. February consequently saw supplier delivery times lengthen to the greatest extent since survey data were first available in 1997 with the exception of last April, when global factory closures hit supply lines. Record supply delays were reported in Germany.

Surging demand and constrained supply contributed to a further marked rise in prices during the month. Average prices paid for inputs by manufacturers rose at a rate not seen since April 2011, in turn feeding through to the steepest rise in prices charged at the factory gate since May 2018.

A more modest rise in costs was seen in the service sector, where weak demand encouraged further discounting and pushed average rates charged lower for a twelfth successive month.

Measured overall, average rates charged for both goods and services were unchanged, contrasting with the declines seen over the prior 11 months.

A further drop in backlogs of work meanwhile meant employment across the eurozone fell for a twelfth straight month. Job losses in the service sector outweighed a modest return to hiring in manufacturing, which saw headcounts rise for the first time since April 2019.

Employment rose modestly in Germany and France, the latter reporting the largest rise for a year, while job losses continued across the rest of the region as a whole.

Finally, business expectations grew more optimistic in February. Sentiment regarding output in the coming 12 months rose to the highest since March 2018, improving in both manufacturing and services. Brighter prospects were primarily linked to hopes of successful vaccine roll-outs in the coming months.

Japan: Private sector downturn extends to February

Flash Composite Output Index, Feb: 47.6 (Jan Final: 47.1)

image

The headline au Jibun Bank Japan Manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index™ (PMI)® rose from 49.8 in January to 50.6 in February, indicating a renewed improvement in the manufacturing sector. Both output and new orders expanded, and at the fastest rates seen since December 2018. New export business also recorded growth, rising for the first time in four months and at the quickest pace since March 2018. Business optimism strengthened in February, which marked the ninth consecutive month of positive sentiment among Japanese manufacturers.

At 45.8 in February, the au Jibun Bank Flash Japan Services Business Activity Index fell from 46.1 in January to signal a quicker deterioration in business activity across the service sector. New business contracted sharply, with the pace of decline the fastest for nine months. Despite weaker demand conditions, Japanese service providers expanded their workforce for the first time since February 2020. Business expectations also strengthened in February, with the level optimism rising to the highest for three months.

 image image

COVID-19

We’ll Have Herd Immunity by April Covid cases have dropped 77% in six weeks. Experts should level with the public about the good news.

Dr. Makary is a professor at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and Bloomberg School of Public Health, chief medical adviser to Sesame Care, and author of “The Price We Pay.”

(…) Cases are down 77% over the past six weeks. If a medication slashed cases by 77%, we’d call it a miracle pill. Why is the number of cases plummeting much faster than experts predicted?

In large part because natural immunity from prior infection is far more common than can be measured by testing. Testing has been capturing only from 10% to 25% of infections, depending on when during the pandemic someone got the virus. Applying a time-weighted case capture average of 1 in 6.5 to the cumulative 28 million confirmed cases would mean about 55% of Americans have natural immunity.

Now add people getting vaccinated. As of this week, 15% of Americans have received the vaccine, and the figure is rising fast. Former Food and Drug Commissioner Scott Gottlieb estimates 250 million doses will have been delivered to some 150 million people by the end of March. (…)

At the current trajectory, I expect Covid will be mostly gone by April, allowing Americans to resume normal life. (…)

But the consistent and rapid decline in daily cases since Jan. 8 can be explained only by natural immunity. Behavior didn’t suddenly improve over the holidays; Americans traveled more over Christmas than they had since March. Vaccines also don’t explain the steep decline in January. Vaccination rates were low and they take weeks to kick in.

(…) countries where new variants have emerged, such as the U.K., South Africa and Brazil, are also seeing significant declines in daily new cases. The risk of new variants mutating around the prior vaccinated or natural immunity should be a reminder that Covid-19 will persist for decades after the pandemic is over. It should also instill a sense of urgency to develop, authorize and administer a vaccine targeted to new variants. (…)

coronavirus-data-explorer (37)

0_All Key Metrics (53)

(…) Results so far are preliminary. The most extensive data released concern the vaccine made by AstraZeneca Plc. In a study in the U.K., volunteers are checked for SARS-CoV-2 infections using weekly self-administered nose and throat swabs. According to results as of Dec. 7, after a single dose, the group that received the vaccine had 67% fewer positive swabs than the placebo group, suggesting the vaccine cuts down on infections as well as disease. Earlier, Moderna Inc. reported similar results from people who had received a single dose of its vaccine as of November.

Data from Israel, which has inoculated a higher percentage of its population than any other country, provide clues that the vaccine in use there, from Pfizer Inc. and BioNTech SE, may reduce transmission even if it doesn’t protect against infection. After more than 75% of people age 60 or older had received one vaccine dose and only 25% of those between the ages of 40 and 60 had, researchers from Israel’s biggest coronavirus testing lab looked at their data. For those who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, there was a notable difference between the two age groups in the average amount of virus found in test swabs. The researchers estimated that vaccination reduces the viral load by 1.6 to 20 times in individuals who become infected despite the shot.

Another study in Israel, following people who became infected after inoculation, found the vaccine reduced their viral load fourfold. Also, a study of Moderna’s Covid vaccine in monkeys suggested that it will reduce, if not completely prevent, onward transmission of the virus. (…)

Doses administered and fully vaccinated people as percent of population

unnamed - 2021-02-19T080316.975

CEO confidence hits 17-year high
  • Overall, 82% of CEOs expect economic conditions to improve over the next six months, up from 63% last quarter, the Conference Board reported.

  • The percentage of CEOs expecting conditions to worsen was cut in half, dropping to 7% from 15%.

  • Similarly, 78% of CEOs anticipate short-term prospects in their own industries to improve, up from 65% in September. (Axios)

Data: The Conference Board; Chart: Andrew Witherspoon/Axios

SENTIMENT WATCH
Global Value Rotation Has Morphed Into Chasing Risk at Any Price

(…) “The demand so far this year has really been for the riskier stocks, be they expensive and exciting technology names or cheaper names beaten up by the economic slump,” wrote strategists including Andrew Lapthorne on Thursday. “While you might then conclude there has been a rotation out of low volatility names, it is only the expensive, more glamorous part of the high-quality segment of the market that is suffering.” (…)

John Authers today:

(…) the single worst-performing factor of the last 12 months for U.S. stocks of all capitalizations has been profitability, according to the wonks at Bloomberg. Holding all else equal, companies that do a really good job of squeezing out earnings have been punished for it. The best factor has been volatility; all else equal, the more a stock’s price tends to swing around, the better it has done, particularly since Vaccine Day. When large numbers of people truly believe that “stocks only go up,” perhaps this is inevitable. It may not be pretty when they discover that volatile stocks also go down. (…)

Tiny-Company Boom Makes Markets Look Silly Fourteen members of the Russell Microcap index have risen so much that they are now larger than the smallest S&P 500 stocks.

(…) Within the Russell 2000 index of small companies, the bottom half of which overlaps with the Microcap measure, an astounding 302 stocks are bigger than at least one S&P 500 member. The largest is Plug Power, up 973% last year and another 48% this year to make the fuel-cell developer big enough to be in the top half of the S&P, worth about the same as State Street Corp. or Kroger Co. (…)

The biggest of the microcap stocks have far outperformed the rest, with the 100 largest in the Russell Microcap index averaging a gain of 56% this year, after tripling last year. (…)

The 40% or so of the Russell 2000 index of smaller companies that have no earnings have beaten the profitable stocks. (…)

Palantir Becomes an Unlikely Darling of the GameStop Crowd Quarterly results and a lock-up expiration hit shares of the richly valued software maker, but it is finding support in online forums

(…) the shares are still trading around 30 times forward sales even with this week’s losses. As stonks go, this one isn’t a bargain.

BTW, Palantir has never made a profit in 17 years, despite dealing almost exclusively with governments…

Metals Are Soaring on a Green Frenzy and Global Recovery

Copper charts from Bloomberg and Goldman Sachs:unnamed - 2021-02-19T075124.725

 7. Copper use in solar set to trend higher through the 2020's. Data available on request. 8. EV related copper demand set accelerate over the next 2-3 years. Data available on request.

Copper mine supply growth, yoy an13. Weak global copper mine supply growth trends from late 2019. Data available on request.

FYI:
How are bitcoin created? An illustrated guide to bitcoin mining, blockchains, and the “minting” process of cryptocurrency’s most popular coin.
Coming bill would allow U.S. news publishers to team up when negotiating with Facebook, Google 

Bipartisan members of Congress plan to introduce a bill in coming weeks to make it easier for smaller news organizations to negotiate with Big Tech platforms, said Rep. Ken Buck, the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee’s antitrust panel.

Buck, who was named the ranking member this month, told Reuters on Thursday the panel would bring out a series of antitrust bills and the first one in the coming weeks would allow smaller news organizations to negotiate collectively with Facebook and Alphabet’s Google. (…)

Uber Loses U.K. Court Battle Over Worker Rights The U.K.’s top court ruled that a group of former Uber drivers were entitled to a minimum wage and other benefits while working for the company, dealing a setback to gig-economy firms in battles world-wide over their employment model.
Lawmakers Push for Wealth Tax on New York Billionaires A coalition of unions, progressive advocacy groups and Democratic officials has endorsed a slate of six revenue bills, including a so-called mark-to-market tax on billionaires.

(…) The tax menu also includes increases to income and capital-gains taxes as well as a proposed tax on financial transactions. Gov. Andrew Cuomo, a Democrat, proposed a $1.5 billion income tax hike as part of his $193 billion budget plan, but hasn’t embraced a mark-to-market tax.

Democrats who control the state Assembly and Senate said all measures—including the mark-to-market tax—remain on the table in fiscal talks. The state faces an $8.2 billion deficit. (…)

Supporters said the mark-to-market tax would bring in the most revenue—an estimated $23 billion—in the coming state fiscal year that could be used to fund education and healthcare that would otherwise face cuts because of the pandemic. (…)

Personal income tax collections currently fund about half of New York’s operating budget, and are disproportionately drawn from the filers with the highest income. According to state officials, the top 2% of taxpayers—about 188,000 filers—account for just over half of the state’s income taxes. (…)

Ms. Ramos said fears of migration are unfounded, and that she continues to talk to colleagues about her bill, which is part of the union-backed “Invest in Our New York” campaign. (…)

David Gamage, a professor at Indiana University law school who helped draft Ms. Ramos’ bill, said the proposal was constitutional in New York because it taxed changes in the value of assets, not simply the value of assets themselves. He said the valuations were possible because the number of affected taxpayers was likely below 200. (…)

So, $23B from less than 200 taxpayers, annually…

New York State had the largest population loss of any of the 10 states that saw declines between July 2018 and July 2019, as New York and the Northeast region as a whole continued to see people leave for other parts of the United States, according to new census data released Monday. (…)

New York was one of 10 states that had population declines during the one-year period. The others were Illinois (-51,250), West Virginia (-12,144), Louisiana (-10,896), Connecticut (-6,233), Mississippi (-4,871), Hawaii (-4,721), New Jersey (-3,835), Alaska (-3,594) and Vermont (-369).

The top five states that had the largest numeric population growth between 2018 and 2019 were Texas (367,000), Florida (233,000), Arizona (121,000), North Carolina (106,469) and Washington State (91,000). (…)

Must be because of the weather, although Texas may have slipped lower on the list…

THE DAILY EDGE: 18 FEBRUARY 2021

U.S. Retail Sales Rose Strongly on Stimulus in January Sales rose 5.3% after three consecutive months of declines during the 2020 holiday shopping season

(…) The retail sales increase followed three months of decline during the holiday season, the Commerce Department said on Wednesday. (…) Spending rose across the board, according to the report, including in categories hit hard by social distancing and pandemic-related restrictions, such as bars and restaurants. (…)

The strongest month-over-month retail sales gains came in categories related to home improvement and work-from-home, such as furniture and electronics. (…)

Pointing up The Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta’s GDPNow model on Wednesday predicted the economy will grow at a 9.5% seasonally adjusted annual rate in the first quarter, up sharply from a 4.5% estimate a week ago.

Haver Analytics adds:

The retail control group, the component of retail sales used to construct the monthly consumption figures in the national accounts and excludes autos, gas stations, building materials and food services, soared 6.0% m/m (+11.8% y/y), auguring a strong gain in monthly consumption in January to be released on February 26. Consumer spending slowed sharply in Q4. So, the January rebound in retail sales likely means that consumption in the national accounts got off to a great start for the first quarter.

Sales of motor vehicles increased a more modest 3.1% m/m in January (+13.0% y/y). Sales at furniture and home furnishing stores surged 12.0% m/m and sales at electric appliance stores soared 14.7% m/m. Sales of building materials and garden supplies rose 4.6% m/m. Gasoline sales increased 4.0% m/m. Department store sales exploded 23.5% m/m in January after having declined in four of the previous five months. Even though consumers appeared to have returned to bricks and mortar stores in January, sales by nonstore retailers were also very strong, rising 11.0% m/m.

Sales at restaurants and drinking establishments rebounded 6.9% m/m (-16.6% y/y) in January after increased social distancing and new restrictions on in-restaurant dining had led to sharp declines in November (-3.6% m/m) and December (-4.6% m/m). The accelerating pace of vaccinations could initiate a more sustained revival in eating out going forward.

The effects of stimulus (or rescue) checks are easy to spot on these charts of control sales: on a MoM basis, January was up 6.1% following -3.6% in the previous 3 months:

fredgraph - 2021-02-18T062126.521

fredgraph - 2021-02-18T061949.761

We can expect consumer expenditures (red line below) to turn positive YoY in January given the recent trend in payrolls.

fredgraph - 2021-02-18T062706.111

The big debate about consumers saving or spending keeps tilting toward the latter.

  • Goldman Sachs economists wasted no time upgrading their forecast, predicting the U.S. economy will grow 7% this year with the unemployment rate falling to 4.1% and core PCE inflation rising to 1.85% by year-end. (Axios)

Are Americans using stimulus cheques to pay down debt? (NBF)

Are American households using the money they receive from the federal government to pay down debt? The general idea that this is the case seems at least partially wrong judging from the most recent data released by the Federal Reserve. Indeed, total household debt increased 1.4% in the last quarter of the year (the fastest pace recorded since 2018Q3), capping a year in which total borrowing rose 3.3%, a number roughly in line with the average for the 2014-2019 period (+3.5%). These figures contrast with
the sizeable deleveraging process that took place following the Great Recession. Recall that total household credit fell at an average pace of 2.2% between 2009 and 2013. This speaks to the effectiveness of Fed policy in the current crisis and the smooth transmission of monetary policies to the real economy in a context where the banking system has been little affected by the pandemic.

If household debt continues to rise, its composition is slowly being altered. Since the beginning of the crisis, credit card balances have shrunk no less than 11.7% (-108 billion) but this decrease has been more than offset by a 4.5% rise in residential credit (+445 billion), which includes mortgage debt and HELOCs. As a result, credit card balances now account for just 5.6% of total household credit (the lowest share on record) while residential debt accounts for 71.4% of the total (the highest ratio since 2017Q1).

This transfer of debt towards the residential sector is a good thing for households, as mortgage interest rates are much lower than those paid on credit card balances. And for those worried of seeing past mistakes being repeated in the United States, keep in mind that mortgage loans are now being directed towards the most creditworthy individuals. Case in point, 72% of mortgage loans originated in 2020Q3-Q4 were for people with a credit score of 760 or above. A sharp contrast with the 26% observed during the formation of the real estate bubble (2003-2005).

image

U.S. Home Builder Index Edges Higher During February

The Composite Housing Market Index from the National Association of Home Builders-Wells Fargo improved 1.2% (13.5% y/y) to 84 during February following January’s 3.5% decline and December’s 4.4% drop. The index reached a record of 90 in November. (…)

image

The important stat is highlighted below:

image

Here’s the long-term view, displaying how strong demand is:

image
U.S. Industrial Production Beats Expectations in January

Industrial production increased 0.9% m/m (-1.8% y/y) in January. The Action Economics Forecast Survey had expected a more modest 0.4% m/m gain. Manufacturing output rose 1.0% m/m (-1.0 y/y), about the same as its average gain over the previous five months. Mining production advanced 2.3% m/m (-11.5% y/y), while the output of utilities declined 1.2% m/m (+6.6% y/y).

Durable manufacturing advanced 0.9% m/m (-1.4% y/y) in January while nondurable manufacturing recorded a stronger advance of 1.2% m/m (-0.2% y/y). Among durables, the largest gain was posted by primary metals (3.9% m/m), while the only declines were posted by nonmetallic mineral products (-1.8% m/m) and by motor vehicles and parts (-0.7% m/m). The output of motor vehicles was reportedly held down by a global shortage of semiconductors used in vehicle components. Most nondurable sectors recorded growth rates in the 1% to 2% range. The only exceptions were the indexes for paper (-0.7% m/m) and for printing and support (-0.6% m/m). (…)

Total industrial production has yet to return to its pre-pandemic levels of early last year. In January, the indexes for about half of the market groups were still below their year-earlier readings. Notably, weakness in the oil patch during most of last year has left the production of energy materials 6.2% below its level of twelve months earlier. (…)

Output of selected high technology equipment rose 1.5% m/m (6.8% y/y) in January, more than reversing the 0.4% m/m decline in December. Excluding these products, overall production expanded 0.9% m/m (-2.0% y/y). Excluding both high tech products & motor vehicles, factory production rose 1.1% m/m (-1.5% y/y).

Capacity utilization for the industrial sector increased 0.7%-point in January to 75.6%. Factory sector utilization also rose to 0.7%-point 74.6%, its highest point since February 2020 and only 0.6%-point below its pre-pandemic level.

Pretty remarkable: manufacturing production has totally recovered its March-April drops and then some (+1.2% since March).

fredgraph - 2021-02-18T064218.722

This chart indexes manufacturing IP, employment and hours to January 2020 = 100. Employment should gradually recover with normalization.

fredgraph - 2021-02-18T064834.176

U.S. PPI Advances 1.3% in January

The Producer Price Index for final demand rose 1.3% (1.7% y/y) in January following 0.3% in December and 0.1% in November. Energy prices surged 5.1% m/m (-3.0% y/y) in January following a 4.9% advance in December. Food prices edged up 0.2% in January (1.4% y/y), reversing a 0.2% decrease in December. Prices of trade services turned higher by 1.0% (2.3% y/y) after December’s 0.8% decline.

Excluding foods, energy and trade service, the “core” advance was 1.2% in January, with 0.4% in December and 0.2% in November. The Action Economics Forecast Survey had looked for a 0.4% increase in the total index in January with the core rate forecast at 0.2%. (…)

image

Core PPI is up 1.8% in the last 3 months, +7.4% a.r.. Core Goods are up 1.5% (+6.1% a.r.), while processed goods are exploding.

image

Is Inflation Coming?

From the Money and Banking blog:

(…) Before we get started, we should say a few words about the mechanism behind last year’s surge in the stock of broad money. Five factors are at play. First, demand for currency rose by 15%, more than double the pace of the previous decade. The 2020 increase was $275 billion. Second, as a precaution early in the pandemic, businesses drew down lines of credit by something in the range of $600 billion. When this happens, the lending bank credits the borrowing firm’s deposit account, which is a part of M2. Third, spurred by fiscal transfers and diminished spending opportunities, household savings skyrocketed, rising by more than $1 trillion. Fourth, the Federal Reserve’s bond purchase programs mechanically boosted both commercial bank reserves (an asset) and (at least initially) customer deposits (a liability) of those who sold securities to the Fed. Finally, with interest rates so close to zero, firms and households faced virtually no opportunity cost of keeping funds in a bank deposit.

Will the 2020 M2 spike lead to substantially higher inflation? As we discuss in an earlier post, the simplest version of monetarism states that controlling money growth is both necessary and sufficient to control inflation. So, if we see money growth rise, then inflation must be on the horizon. The following chart is Exhibit A in the case for this view. Using data for 90 countries on average annual inflation and money growth over nearly four decades, we can see that there are no examples of countries with either sustained rapid money growth and low average inflation or the converse. And, if we were to assume that the 2020 M2 growth rate in the United States were the new average—rather than a temporary spike—then this picture would lead us to anticipate U.S. inflation beyond anything we have seen since the end of World War I.

Average Annual Consumer Price inflation and Broad Money Growth, 1980 to 2017

Source: IMF World Economic Outlook, World Bank, and authors’ calculations.

Source: IMF World Economic Outlook, World Bank, and authors’ calculations.

However, this conclusion is profoundly misleading. First, no one seriously believes that U.S. monetary aggregates will continue to grow rapidly and unabated for years. Consistent with the relative stability of inflation expectations, there seems to be agreement that the 2020 jump is a one-off shock (see the chart here). Second, at low levels of inflation, the short-run link between money growth and inflation is loose, at best. Our recent post shows how in recent years, fluctuations in the two have been pretty much independent. Third, and related to the previous point, low nominal interest rates favor holdings of deposits included in M2. (…)

What is clear from this post is the link between money growth and inflation. What is unclear is how the current bulge in money will get normalized.

NY Fed’s Business Leaders Survey
Covering service firms in New York, northern New Jersey, and southwestern Connecticut

Activity in the region’s service sector continued to decline significantly, though at a slower pace than last month, according to firms responding to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s February 2021 Business Leaders Survey. The survey’s headline business activity index rose ten points to -21.5. (…)

The index for future business activity rose eleven points to 32.5, and the future business climate index rose to 34.4, both reaching their highest level since the pandemic began. Just over 50 percent of firms expect activity to expand and conditions to be better than normal in six months. Employment levels, wages, and prices are all expected to rise, and firms expect to increase capital spending in the months ahead.

chart (13)

image

Kraft Heinz, Conagra may raise some product prices as grains, edible oil costs surge

Kraft Heinz Co and Conagra Brands Inc said they may choose to raise prices this year on some products that use wheat, sugar and other commodities that are becoming increasingly expensive due to high demand. (…)

Ingredient and packaging costs represent 60% to 65% of Conagra’s total cost basket, Finance Chief Dave Marberger said on the sidelines of the Consumer Analyst Group of New York virtual conference.

With people on lockdown cooking more at home – and still stockpiling in some parts of the world – prices for commodities like sugar, wheat and soy are surging, forcing food companies to absorb higher costs. (…)

“Where we are seeing (inflation) is in grains and everything related to grains … It’s across the board. Sugar has big inflation; mac & cheese because it has wheat; mayo because it has oil; salad dressing because it has oil; all sweet products like desserts,” Patricio said.

Kraft Heinz – which makes Jell-O, Kraft Macaroni & Cheese and a slew of Heinz mayonnaise products and salad dressings – said it did not increase prices in the most recent quarter, but did cut down on promotions and discounts. (…)

“We’ve got some inflationary pressures coming forward. And we do expect mid-to-high single-digit commodity inflation in the first half. So we have to be at the top of our game in pricing going forward,” Unilever Chief Financial Officer Graeme Pitkethly said on a recent earnings call. (…)

Saudi Arabia Set to Raise Oil Output Amid Recovery in Prices The world’s largest oil exporter plans to increase production, say advisers to the kingdom, a sign of growing confidence in an oil-price recovery.

(…) In earnings calls this week, shale executives said they are sticking to capital discipline, which has become a mantra of the industry following a yearslong push by investors. Some said they plan to restrain growth this year in spending, drilling and production, anticipating they will reinvest roughly 70% of their cash flows from operations back into drilling, with the rest paying for debt and shareholder dividends. (…)

Global Covid Infections Drop to Slowest Pace Since October Daily fatalities have averaged less than 10,000 over the past five days, down from a peak of more than 18,000 in mid-January.

Doses administered and fully vaccinated people as percent of population

US bond sell-off stirs warnings over stock market strength Investors say a further sharp rise in yields would threaten Wall Street’s record run

Line chart of US 10-year Treasury yield, % showing Treasury sell-off accelerates on stimulus hopes

TECHNICALS WATCH

The 13/34–Week EMA Trend remains bullish as are most other indicators save several very extended sentiment indicators.

From INK Research:

At some point, the rally will run out of steam. We will look to insiders to confirm that we have reached upside exhaustion by watching for a clear bottoming formation in our US Sentiment Indicator. We seem to be near a top in share prices, but we are not there yet. The indicator is at about 22%, approaching the 21.5% level seen back in November 2013 when the market was enjoying the last fumes of QE III before the Fed decided to taper its bond purchases.

To put things in perspective, at 20%, there would be five stocks with key insider selling for every one with buying. Given that we believe the Fed is a long way from tapering, we expect the indicator to easily challenge the 20% level and probably head below. That means stocks will likely continue to climb the wall of inflation worry.

image

Insiders are loading up on Utes:

image

Former insider now outsider:

Steven Mnuchin joined the speech circuit, adding his name to a list that includes Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, Bono and Barack Obama. Mnuchin hired the Harry Walker Agency to manage his engagements and will charge about $250,000 to speak in person. A virtual address will set you back as much as $100,000. (Bloomberg)