Year: 2023

CB Leading Economic Index: Forecasts Mild Recession by Mid-2023

The latest Conference Board Leading Economic Index (LEI) for April dropped to 107.5 from March’s revised figure of 108.2. This is the 13th consecutive monthly decline, the longest streak since 2009, and the lowest reading since September 2020. Today’s reading represented a 0.6% month-over-month decline, consistent with the forecast. (…)

In my post Economic Perspectives: 24 April 2023: Re-Acceleration!

The widely forecast U.S. recession has failed to materialize so far as the economy experienced rolling recessions in housing (strong) and goods production (mild) offset by recovering services.

That may explain why a historically reliable indicator such as the CB LEI has yet to deliver on its recession signals. The LEI has 10 indicators; 5 of the 7 nonfinancial components are goods-related plus 1 of 3 financial components, the goods-dominated S&P 500 Index. (…)

So, in an economy where goods now weigh half as much as services, goods-biased indicators can be misleading when services and employment stay reasonably firm.

Philly Fed Manufacturing Index: Overall Decline Continues

The latest manufacturing index came in at -10.4, up 20.9 from last month, marking the index’s ninth negative reading in a row. The six-month outlook was down 8.8 points from last month and remains in negative territory for the third straight month at -10.3. Since this is a diffusion index, negative readings indicate contraction, positive ones indicate expansion.

From the report:

The indexes for new orders and shipments both increased for the second consecutive month but remained negative. The index for current new orders rose 14 points to -8.9, and the current shipments index edged up 3 points to -4.7. 

On balance, the firms reported a decline in employment. The employment index fell from -0.2 to -8.6, the index’s third consecutive negative reading. Over 15 percent of the firms reported a decrease in employment, and 7 percent reported an increase; most firms (76 percent) reported no change. The average workweek index was little changed at ‑7.7.

In this month’s special questions, the firms were asked to forecast the changes in prices of their own products and for U.S. consumers over the next four quarters. Regarding their own prices over the next year, the firms’ median forecast was for an expected increase of 4.5 percent, unchanged from when this question was last asked in February.

The firms reported a median increase of 6.0 percent in their own prices over the past year, down from 7.0 percent in February.

The firms’ median forecast for the rate of inflation for U.S. consumers over the next year was 5.0 percent, up from 4.0 percent in February. Over the long run, the firms’ median forecast for the 10-year average inflation rate was 3.3 percent, up from 3.0 percent in February.

BTW:

Philly Fed index below -25 accurately predicted a recession since the 1970s We’re already at -31.3 (@GameofTrades_)

Also a “goods” index.

Home Prices Post Largest Annual Drop in Over 11 Years U.S. existing home sales, which make up most of the housing market, fell 3.4% in April from the prior month to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.28 million.

April sales fell 23.2% from a year earlier.

The national median existing-home price fell 1.7% in April from a year earlier to $388,800, the biggest year-over-year price decline since January 2012, NAR said. Median prices, which aren’t seasonally adjusted, were down 6% from a record $413,800 in June. Home prices have fallen the most in the western half of the U.S., while prices continue to rise from a year earlier in many eastern markets. (…)

Nationally, there were 1.04 million homes for sale or under contract at the end of April, up 7.2% from March and up 1% from April 2022, NAR said. (…)

The number of homes for sale is up from a year ago because houses are sitting on the market longer. But the number of new listings in April fell 21% from a year earlier, according to Realtor.com. (…)

The share of first-time buyers in the market was 29% in April, up from 28% a year earlier. About 28% of April existing-home sales were purchased in cash, up from 26% in the same month a year ago, NAR said.

The typical home sold in April was on the market for 22 days, up from 17 days a year earlier, NAR said.

@calculatedrisk

US Jobless Claims Tumbled Last Week After Fraud-Inflated Jump

Applications for US unemployment benefits fell by the most since 2021 after fraudulent claims in at least one state boosted the numbers in previous weeks.

Initial unemployment claims fell by 22,000 to 242,000 in the week ended May 13, Labor Department data showed Thursday. On an unadjusted basis, claims decreased by the most in two months, to 215,810, largely due to a drop in Massachusetts. (…)

Massachusetts accounted for nearly half of the nationwide increase in unadjusted claims in the week through May 6, and state officials said it was mainly due to fraud. Kentucky has also found an increase in the number of “imposter” claims, according to its website. (…)

Continuing claims, which include people who have received unemployment benefits for a week or more and are a good indicator of how hard it is for people to find work after losing their jobs, edged down to 1.8 million in the week ended May 6.

The Rise and Fall of Pandemic Excess Savings

(…) despite a rapid drawdown of savings in recent months, there is still a large stock of aggregate excess savings in the economy—some $500 billion.

The distribution and allocation of excess savings and wealth across the income distribution suggest that households on average, including those at the lower end of the distribution, continue to have considerably more liquid funds at their disposal compared with the pre-pandemic period. We expect that these excess savings could continue to support consumer spending at least into the fourth quarter of 2023.

This outlook is uncertain depending on, for example, whether households have developed a preference for higher savings, significantly shifted their spending patterns, or substituted other sources of income for the expired pandemic-era cash inflows. (…)

Aggregate personal savings versus the pre-pandemic trend

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis and authors’ calculations.
Note: Excess savings calculated as the accumulated difference in actual de-annualized personal savings and the trend implied by data for the 48 months leading up to the first month of the 2020 recession as defined by the NBER.

Cumulative drawdowns reached $1.6 trillion as of March 2023 (red area), implying there is approximately $500 billion of excess savings remaining in the aggregate economy. Should the recent pace of drawdowns persist—for example, at average rates from the past 3, 6, or 12 months—aggregate excess savings would likely continue to support household spending at least into the fourth quarter of 2023. This outlook can be possibly extended into 2024 and beyond if, for instance, drawdown rates moderate or household preferences for savings increase.

This dynamic in excess savings associated with the pandemic period is remarkably unlike any past recessions. Figure 3 plots the monthly accumulation of excess savings since the onset of past recessions, where each of their respective pre-recession trends are calculated in the same way as described earlier for the pandemic episode.

Aggregate excess savings following onset of recessions

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis and authors’ calculations.

The rapid accumulation and subsequent drawdown of excess savings following the onset of the pandemic recession contrasts sharply with the gradual increase in excess savings observed in past recessions. For many recessions, excess savings appears to plateau after three or four years instead of quickly reverting toward their respective pre-recession trends, as seen in the post-pandemic curve.

One exception is the Great Financial Crisis of 2008, which was followed by an extended period of personal savings rising above trend. Voinea and Loungani (2022) attribute this rise to households slowly making up for the wealth and asset values lost during the 2008 crisis.

The stark contrast between the pandemic recession and prior recessions holds true when the data are adjusted for inflation, as well as when we look at excess savings as a share of trend savings or as percent changes from pre-recession periods. (…)

  Fed Officials Suggest June Rate Rise Will Be Close Call Federal Reserve officials indicated the decision to raise interest rates at their meeting next month was shaping up as a close call, with another policy maker Thursday hinting she would support an increase.

Dallas Fed President Lorie Logan, a key centrist on the Fed’s policy-setting committee, suggested that barring further weakness in the economic outlook, she would be prepared to lift the benchmark federal-funds rate by a quarter percentage point at the central bank’s June 13-14 meeting. (…)

Ms. Logan said she didn’t see enough evidence that inflation was firmly on track to reach the central bank’s 2% target because much of the recent improvement has come from falling energy prices and because tight labor markets could continue to support income and spending growth that fuels higher inflation. (…)

“The data in coming weeks could yet show that it is appropriate to skip a meeting. As of today, though, we aren’t there yet.” (…)

Separately, Fed governor Philip Jefferson highlighted arguments on Thursday that could be used to justify holding rates steady or raising them again in June.

“On the one hand, inflation is too high, and we have not yet made sufficient progress in reducing it,” he said during remarks at an insurance conference in Washington. But Mr. Jefferson, who was nominated last week by President Biden to serve as the Fed’s vice chair, said economic activity was slowing due to the Fed’s rate rises, and he expected it to cool further this year.

“History shows that monetary policy works with long and variable lags, and that a year is not a long enough period for demand to feel the full effect of higher interest rates,” he said. (…)

Over the past week, two other officials—Fed governor Michelle Bowman and Cleveland Fed President Loretta Mester —have said they also don’t think the Fed has made enough progress on inflation to justify pausing rate rises.

Two other Fed presidents, Austan Goolsbee of Chicago and Raphael Bostic of Atlanta, have suggested they would have been open to pausing rate increases at the May meeting or would prefer to do so at the June meeting to better assess the effects of the Fed’s recent increases.

John Authers sums up this week’s “Fed speaks”:

Quincy Krosby, chief investment strategist at LPL Financial, said that the speakers had “seemingly been tasked with sending a message to the markets.” The message, she said, was that the Fed “at  this point, has no plans to cut rates this year, but is now also introducing the possibility that another rate hike could be forthcoming at the June 13-14 meeting.”

Bank of Canada’s Macklem says inflation coming down despite April gain

(…) “Inflation has come down. It is coming down. We expect it will continue to come down,” Macklem said when asked about the inflation figures published this week, adding that April inflation “did come in stronger than we expected.”

Before Macklem spoke, money markets had seen an 80% chance for a hike in July. After, that dropped to 60%.

Earlier, the Bank of Canada said it was increasingly worried about the ability of households to pay off their debts and is seeing signs of financial stress among some home buyers. (…)

The share of indebted households behind on payments for at least 60 days has been increasing since mid-2022 but remains below pre-pandemic levels, the bank said.

“In light of higher borrowing costs, the Bank of Canada is more concerned than it was last year about the ability of households to service their debt,” it said in an annual report on the health of the financial system.

“While most households are proving resilient to increases in debt-servicing costs, early signs of financial stress are emerging,” particularly among recent home buyers, according to the so-called Financial System Review.

About a third of mortgage holders saw an increase in payments compared with February 2022, just before borrowing costs started to rise.

By the end of 2026, almost all mortgage holders will face higher payments, the bank said, as homeowners renew deals. (…)

• Bank of Canada says mortgage payments could spike as much as 40 per cent

David Rosenberg posted this chart last March:

• Canadians should not expect BoC to return to low rates, Macklem says Warns that historically low borrowing costs are a thing of the past with ‘transition period’ ahead

How El Niño Could Scramble Commodity Markets 

The hard-to-predict climate pattern, when powerful, can usher in intense drought or rainfall, upend output from the world’s breadbasket regions, and whipsaw the prices of commodities. Brazilian sugar producers, American grain farmers and international traders are bracing for the phenomenon. But the cyclical shift in ocean temperatures can just as easily be a dud.

El Niño occurs when trade winds moving west across the Pacific Ocean weaken and warmer-than-normal water sloshes toward the west coast of the Americas. Meteorologists at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration on Thursday gave 80% odds of at least a moderate El Niño appearing in the Northern Hemisphere by year’s end, with a 55% chance of a strong event. (…)

Nonfuel commodity prices have historically risen about 5.3% globally within a year of the pattern beginning, according to the International Monetary Fund. As surface temperatures warm in the eastern Pacific, turning La Niña into El Niño, droughts in parts of Asia can curb production of Indian sugar, Malaysian palm oil and Australian wheat. In South America, wetter weather can boost farms or cause floods that disrupt harvest seasons.

The U.S. has previously experienced a mix of El Niño impacts, with more precipitation in southern states and hotter, drier weather in the Plains. (…)

In South America, there is a fine distinction between additional rain that can nurture crops and deluges that can overwhelm them. (…)

So far this year, global benchmark prices for the raw sugar that ends up in sodas and processed foods have surged more than 30%, reaching their highest level in 11 years, according to FactSet. (…)

In the U.S., growing swaths of wheat-producing Plains states such as Nebraska, Kansas and Oklahoma are battling what the U.S. Drought Monitor describes as extreme or exceptional drought. Many farmers have abandoned scorched land in droves, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture expects them to harvest the smallest portion of acres planted with winter wheat since 1917. Benchmark prices for hard red wheat, often used in baked goods, have jumped about 10% this month. (…)

Federal projections of a record corn harvest and bountiful soybean haul have pushed down prices for those commodities, and traders are betting that favorable weather will continue driving declines. The price of benchmark corn futures has dropped 13% from the beginning of the year, while soybeans are down more than 8%.

“The risk is all the speculators get caught on the wrong side [of the trade] and the weather pattern completely surprises everybody,” said Shawn Hackett, an agricultural analyst who advises food producers, traders and hedge funds. (…)

John Authers: This Equities Rally Is Running on Hope and a Story The world-changing narrative around AI has hooked up with the Fed’s determination to provide liquidity, even during a rate-raising cycle.

(…) The first-quarter earnings season is about to wind down, with only a handful of companies left to report, and the verdict is in. They were largely better than expected. But then, little had been expected of them.

Deutsche Bank Research strategists under Binky Chadha analyzed over 175 earnings calls commentaries and found that many companies found themselves in a “solid” business state despite macroeconomic headwinds. What helped, perhaps, is that they were braced for the worst — or at least a modest recession — which has prompted many firms to put measures into place when the economy does fall into one.

Companies sounded a bit less concerned about inflation than they had been, and were quick to say that the stresses in the banking sector were confined to a narrow group. They “took pains” to distinguish this from the Great Financial Crisis in 2008. Overall, this was a tone of guarded optimism, but earnings are still down from a year ago. And while estimates for the next 12 months did shift upward, that’s largely because they had fallen so far since last summer. (…)

“Funding and liquidity, not earnings/fundamentals, are the year-to-date drivers of the S&P 500 rally,” Harvey said. (…)

But there is at least some reason to think that the Fed is keeping liquidity flowing through the system, even if it’s keeping rates high to try to battle inflation. (…)

There’s one final ingredient to explain this year’s rally, and in particular the performance of the last few days: artificial intelligence. It’s causing bona fide excitement, and that shows up in startling stock moves. Points of Return detailed last week how references to AI were beginning to have the same impact that mentions of Bitcoin or dot-coms had in previous generations. This week’s latest example comes from an ultra-bullish interview that Jensen Huang, the CEO and founder of the chipmaker Nvidia Corp., gave to CNBC on Wednesday:

We have reinvented computing for the first time since the IBM System 360, 60 years ago. There’s a trillion dollars worth of data center infrastructure installed in the world based on that old method of doing computation. Now we have accelerated computing, and we have the killer app for generative computing: generative AI.

Big bold claims like this tend to transport some of us back 25 years to the dawn of the internet age, when similarly transcendent forecasts were being made, and even Alan Greenspan allowed himself to believe in a “new economic paradigm.”

The interview had the kind of effect on Nvidia’s share price that we might recall from 1999 and 2000 as well. (…) Nvidia’s stock has risen 112% for the year so far, and is closing in on its all-time high from 2021.

The company is seen as a critical supplier of the chips that will be needed to fuel AI, just as Cisco Systems Inc. was once propelled higher by the belief that its routers would make it critical to the infrastructure of the growing internet. (…)

Cisco stock currently trades 14% below its peak from 2000; that’s mostly because the multiple of sales that investors will pay has dropped from 44 to 3.6 over that time. Nvidia now sells at 29 times its sales. (…)

Just for fun:

• The first chart (CPMS/Morningstar) plots Price/Sales for CSCO and NVDA:

Price to Sales

• P/S ratios are meaningless without Earnings/Sales (net margins). CSCO’s margins had jumped from 20-22% in 1996 to 36% in 2000. NVDA’s margins are currently forecast at 42%, up from the 30% range pre-pandemic.

Net Margins

• The next two charts display Price/CF and CF margins. NVDA’s P/CF on trailing CF is over 100x. Its CF margins have been rising until mid-2022, peaking at 46%, and are now 30%.

• CSCO’s P/CF also exceeded 100x in 2000 when its CF margins were 36%. Margins have stabilized between 25% and 30% but its P/CF is now 14.7x.

Nasdaq Outperforms The DJIA By a Bull Market (Bespoke)

Every day it seems the gap just keeps getting wider, and today the YTD performance spread between the Nasdaq and the DJIA widened out to over 20 percentage points – or the equivalent of the traditional threshold for a bull market. 

As of Thursday afternoon, the Nasdaq was up 20.4% YTD while the DJIA was barely hanging above the unchanged line with a gain of 0.3%.

Since the Nasdaq launched in early 1972, there have only been three other years where the index outperformed the DJIA by more than 15 percentage points YTD through 5/18, but 2023 is on pace to go down as the only year where the performance gap exceeded 20 percentage points. (…)

(Bespoke)

NY Fed Services Activity Survey

Activity declined significantly in the region’s service sector, according to firms responding to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s May 2023 Business Leaders Survey. The survey’s headline business activity index fell seven points to -16.8. The business climate index was little changed at -45.8, suggesting the business climate remains much worse than normal.

Employment edged slightly higher despite the decline in activity. Wages and input prices increased at about the same pace as last month, while selling price increases picked up.

Looking ahead, firms expect conditions to improve only somewhat over the next six months.

Fed Poised for Big Upgrade to Outlook Despite Swirling Risks

(…) “They are going to have to raise GDP and lower unemployment for the year,” said Julia Coronado, president of MacroPolicy Perspectives LLC and a former Fed economist. “It definitely reinforces higher for longer. The Fed isn’t going to be turning around and cutting anytime soon.” (…)

That will likely prompt the Federal Open Market Committee to boost its 2023 economic growth forecast to around 1% from 0.4%, and cut its unemployment rate expected late this year to around 4% from its prior estimate of 4.5%, said Stephen Stanley, chief US economist at Santander US Capital Markets in New York. (…)

Stanley said the FOMC’s March unemployment estimate – 1.1 percentage point higher than unemployment in April – seems impossible absent a “really severe” recession. “They’ve been way too pessimistic about 2023 and their projections all across the board,” he said. (…)

Growth averaged 1.1% in the first quarter and is tracking 2.9% so far for the second quarter, according to the Atlanta Fed’s gross domestic product tracker, and 2% per Goldman Sachs economists’ tracking. (…)

The strength could lead to a “hawkish pause” in June, in which the Fed won’t raise rates but will signal the possibility of future hikes, said Matt Colyar, Moody’s Analytics economist. (…)

April Housing Starts: Near Record Multi-Family Under Construction

Privately‐owned housing starts in April were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1,401,000. This is 2.2 percent above the revised March estimate of 1,371,000, but is 22.3 percent below the April 2022 rate of 1,803,000. Single‐family housing starts in April were at a rate of 846,000; this is 1.6 percent above the revised March figure of 833,000. The April rate for units in buildings with five units or more was 542,000. (…)

Total housing starts in April were slightly above expectations, however, starts in February and March were revised down, combined. (…)

Currently there are 977 thousand multi-family units under construction.  This is the highest level since September 1973! This is close to the all-time record of 994 thousand in 1973 (being built for the baby-boom generation). For multi-family, construction delays are a significant factor. The completion of these units should help with rent pressure.

Combined, there are 1.675 million units under construction, just 35 thousand below the all-time record of 1.710 million set in October 2022. (…)

This chart combines single and multi family units by stage of construction. Permits and starts have declined from their recent peaks, which will bring “units under construction” down, but there is no collapse in construction despite the sharp rise in interest rates.

Also, even with the strength in multis, the weak single-family market means there is no tsunami of new housing units coming.

The first chart above shows that multis starts have flattened in the past year. Multis permits are down 31% since December 2021.

Interest in singles remains cyclically very low.

Commercial Real Estate Prices in the US Fall for First Time Since 2011

The less than 1% decline was led by drops in multifamily residences and office buildings, data culled by Moody’s from courthouse records of transactions showed.

“Lots more price declines are coming,” Mark Zandi, Moody’s Analytics chief economist, said.

The danger is that will compound the difficulties confronting many banks at a time when they are fighting to retain deposits in the face of a steep rise in interest rates over the past year. (…)

The price declines seen so far have been more marked for higher-priced properties, according to commercial property company CoStar Group. Its value-weighted price index has fallen for eight straight months and in March stood 5.2% lower than a year ago. (…)

The rise in employees working from home has driven some downtown retailers and restaurants out of business and forced owners of office buildings to reduce rents to retain tenants or to sell all together. (…)

Banks held more than $700 billion in loans on office buildings and downtown retailers in the fourth quarter of last year, according to the Fed. More than $500 billion of that was extended by smaller lenders. (…)

One potential bright spot: The big run-up in prices in past years has left many borrowers with substantial equity cushions in the properties they own. That reduces the dangers of defaults and limits the potential losses for lenders.

The loan-to-value ratio of mortgages backed by office buildings and downtown retail properties was in the range of 50% to 60% on average at the end of last year for credit extended by bigger banks, based on data collected by the Fed.

“Delinquencies and defaults will rise, but I don’t think we’ll see a lot of forced sales,” Zandi said.

He forecasts prices dropping about 10%, assuming the US skirts a recession. If it doesn’t, the declines could get a lot worse. (…)

• Overexposed US regional banks could sell commercial property loans

Many U.S. regional lenders may have to consider selling off commercial real estate (CRE) loans at a steep discount after breaching key regulatory thresholds for exposure to the troubled sector, according to new data and market sources.

(…) previously unreported data from New York-based real estate data provider Trepp, shared with Reuters, show many regional banks’ holdings exceed thresholds stipulated by regulators. (…)

A Trepp study of 4,760 banks’ public regulatory data published late Tuesday found that 763 have either a CRE or construction loan concentration ratio that exceeded these thresholds.

Some 30% of banks with $1 billion to $10 billion in assets had exceeded at least one ratio, while 23% of banks with assets of $10 billion to $50 billion exceeded at least one ratio.

While big banks have recently warned about CRE exposure, the new Trepp data underscores how acute and widespread the problem is across the banking sector. (…)

JPMorgan said in a March report it expects about 21% of outstanding office loans in commercial mortgage-backed securities will eventually default. (…)

• BlackRock to call staff back to office at least four days a week

(…) Last month, J.P.Morgan Chase & Co (JPM.N), the United States’ largest bank, asked its managing directors to work from office five days a week.

J.P.Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon, along with Wall Street counterparts at Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS.N) and Morgan Stanley (MS.N), has been a strong advocate of in-office work.

Global debt on the rise, emerging markets cross $100 trillion mark, trade group says

A measure of debt across the globe rose in the first quarter to almost $305 trillion, and the rising cost to service that debt is triggering concern about the financial system’s leverage, a widely tracked study showed.

The Institute of International Finance, a financial services trade group, said on Wednesday global debt rose by $8.3 trillion in the first three months of this year compared to the end of 2022 to $304.9 trillion, the highest since the first quarter of last year and second-highest quarterly reading ever.

“Global debt is now $45 trillion higher than its pre-pandemic level and is expected to continue increasing rapidly,” said the IIF in its quarterly Global Debt Monitor.

After peaking near 360% in 2021 the debt-to-output ratio has stabilized around 335%, above pre-pandemic levels.

Aging populations and rising healthcare costs continue to put spending pressure on governments, while “heightened geopolitical tensions are also expected to drive further increases in national defense spending over the medium term,” wrote IIF researchers. (…)

“Shadow banks now account for more than 14% of financial markets, with the majority of growth stemming from a rapid expansion of U.S. investment funds and private debt markets.” (…)

The report showed 75% of the IIF’s emerging market (EM) universe saw an increase in debt levels in dollar terms in the first quarter, with the overall figure crossing over $100 trillion for the first time. China, Mexico, Brazil, India and Turkey posted the biggest increases, the data showed. (…)

• WE O U $17T

The New York Fed recently released its first-quarter report on household debt, revealing that American households now owe someone a staggering $17 trillion.

The majority of that is tied up in home mortgages, with the remainder split across student loans, car loans and credit cards — with the latter (and smallest) of those 3 categories particularly striking.

Credit card debt remained at a record level of $986 billion, defying the usual trend of post-holiday debt reduction. Indeed, this is the first time in over two decades that credit card balances haven’t decreased in the first quarter — a period when many cut back on spending after the holiday period of October-December.

All told, credit card debt rose 17% in the last 12 months, a potential sign that consumers are turning to credit cards to cope with mounting daily expenses as inflation continues to bite. Another concern is the rising delinquency rate, with ~4.6% of credit card debt transitioning into “serious delinquency” — where debt remains unpaid for 90+ days — up from just 3% during the same period last year.

This current situation stands in contrast to the pandemic, when US consumers, buoyed by stimulus checks and lockdown savings, managed to pay off $160bn of credit card debt between the end of 2019 and March 2021. (Chartr)

In reality, Americans have considerably deleveraged after the GFC and after the pandemic.

FYI:

• Target’s comparable sales were flat compared to the previous quarter, as executives pointed to increasingly cautious consumers. (WSJ) But it beat earnings expectations despite sluggish sales.
• TJX reported F1Q24 EPS of $0.76, ahead of GS/FactSet consensus at $0.72, with the beat primarily driven by stronger gross margins. Overall comp store sales were 3% vs. GS/consensus at 3.4%/2.7%.