The enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it’s the illusion of knowledge (Stephen Hawking)

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so (Mark Twain)

Invest with smart knowledge and objective odds

NEW$ & VIEW$ (12 MARCH 2014)

Pretty long post today, but interesting, and not very encouraging…Disappointed smile

Fewer Confident Enough to Quit in Chilly Winter Job Market

The latest data on U.S. workers’ willingness to change jobs adds to evidence the job market slowed this winter — and just not because of the weather.

The share of U.S. workers who voluntarily resigned from their jobs — the nation’s “quits rate” — dipped to 1.7% in January, from 1.8% in December, the Labor Department said Tuesday. That was the first drop in this rate since March 2013, though it remains just below its highest level during the economic recovery. (The Labor Department revised its data on quits, which began in December 2000; originally, the rate in December 2013 was 1.7%.)

All told, some 2.38 million workers quit their jobs in January, down slightly from 2.42 million in December and the second straight drop following months of gradual improvement.

Economists, including new Federal Reserve Chairwoman Janet Yellen, consider the willingness of workers to leave their jobs an important gauge of the health of the labor market. When workers are confident about jobs, they’re more likely to jump ship to find a new one or because they have already secured a position. When they’re not confident about the labor market, they stay put.

A healthy amount of quitting also makes the labor market more fluid and dynamic. If workers don’t quit, there are fewer openings for other job seekers. Most job openings come from people leaving jobs, not from things like tech firms staffing up. (…)

Other data in Tuesday’s report also pointed to weakness on jobs this winter. The “hires” rate, or the number of hires as a share of the employed, remained stuck at 3.3% for the fourth straight month, suggesting firms aren’t picking up their hiring. (This rate was 3.2% in January 2013—and in January 2012.) (…)

Here’s the best chart on JOLT, courtesy of CalculatedRisk:

Mortgage Applications Decrease in Latest Weekly Survey

Mortgage applications decreased 2.1 percent from one week earlier, according to data from the Mortgage Bankers Association’s (MBA) Weekly Mortgage Applications Survey for the week ending March 7, 2014. The Refinance Index decreased 3 percent from the previous week. The seasonally adjusted Purchase Index decreased 1 percent from one week earlier.

Lightning U.S. WHOLESALE SALES CRATER IN JANUARY

I did not see this important release in any media this morning.

image

A 1.9% monthly drop is huge. It may be the weather, but it may also be that Christmas sales were so bad that inventories need to be rapidly and radically worked down. Inventories seem to be particularly high in Automotive (+6.9% YoY), Furniture (+6.2%)

Obama to Expand Overtime Eligibility

Currently, many businesses aren’t required to pay overtime to certain salaried workers if they earn more than $455 a week, a level that was set in 2004 and comes to roughly $24,000 a year. The White House is expected to direct the Labor Department to raise that salary threshold, though it is unclear by how much.

Ross Eisenbrey, vice president of the liberal Economic Policy Institute, and Jared Bernstein, a former White House economist, recently proposed the limit be increased to $984 a week, or roughly $50,000 a year.

“That would mean between five- and 10-million people could be affected, but they might choose a lower number,” Mr. Eisenbrey said about the White House plans.

The rule change is expected to apply to salaried workers, as most of those paid by the hour already qualify for overtime. It would amend the implementation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and likely would require employers to pay time and a half for weekly work in excess of 40 hours by certain employees.

Euro-Zone Industrial Output Down Industrial production in the 18 countries that share the euro fell for a second month in January, underlining the fragile nature of the economic recovery.

imageThe European Union’s statistics agency Eurostat Wednesday said output fell by 0.2% from December 2013, although it was up 2.1% from January 2013. The decline in output was a surprise, with the consensus forecast of 22 economists surveyed by The Wall Street Journal last week being for an expansion of 0.5%. (…)

The decline in output wasn’t widespread across the currency area, with increases recorded in Germany and Spain. However, there was a very sharp fall in the Netherlands, the euro zone’s fifth largest member, which saw output drop by 6.4% from December, while in Finland, output fell by 3.5%, and in France, it fell by 0.3%.

Figures for December were revised higher, and Eurostat now estimates that output fell 0.4% during the month, having previously calculated they fell 0.7%.

High five Must be the weather! Well, it probably is. Europe has had a mild winter and energy production was down 2.5% in each of December and January.image

High five But it could also be due to this:

Power Companies Cut Dividends as Energy Subsidies Hit Earnings Renewable Energy Generation Erodes Wholesale Power Prices, Hits Profitability

European utilities E. ON SE EOAN.XE -0.71% and Enel ENEL.MI +0.16% SpA lowered their annual dividends Wednesday as the subsidy-led boom in renewable energy across the region undermined their fossil-fuel electricity business and hit earnings.

For decades utilities such as Germany’s E. ON and Italy’s Enel have generated vast profit with fleets of industrial-scale plants that powered Europe’s economies.

More recently, a surge in renewable energy generation, which Germany and other European Union governments have heavily subsidized in the hope of reducing carbon-dioxide emissions, has eroded wholesale power prices and diminished the profitability of conventional plants.

E. ON slashed its yearly dividend to shareholders by nearly half to €0.60 a share from €1.10 paid out last year. (…)

The utility said that underlying profit, an after-tax figure that strips out nonrecurring effects, was down 46% at €2.24 billion. Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization fell 13.5% to €9.32 billion, on a 7.8% decline in revenue to €122.5 billion. E. ON adjusts Ebitda to exclude nonrecurring items.

The company expects 2014 Ebitda between €8 billion and €8.6 billion and underlying profit of between €1.5 billion and €1.9 billion.

Enel reduced its dividend by 13% to €0.13 but pledged to lift its payout ratio to at least 50% of ordinary net profit, which excludes special items, from its current payout policy of at least 40%. (…)

The poor results chime with the mood among most of Europe’s other established electricity providers in recent weeks. In response to the worsening business environment, utilities across Europe are cutting costs and thousands of jobs. Some have responded to the poor power price level by shutting down or mothballing unprofitable power plants. E. ON plans to shut down a total of 13-gigawatts of generation capacity, which equates to the output of at least 13 large nuclear reactors or more than a quarter of E. ON’s fleet of conventional power plants in Europe.

E. ON’s German rival RWE AG RWE.XE -0.94% last week reported its first net loss in more than 60 years, after booking billions in write downs as renewables continue to squeeze its plants and curb wholesale electricity prices. RWE lowered its 2013 dividend payment to €1 a share, half of what it paid the year before. The crippling impact of renewable energies on the European power generation industry was evident last month when France’s GDF Suez SA GSZ.FR -1.27% announced write-downs worth €14.9 billion. (…)

EMERGING SUBMERGING

imageEmerging markets have substantially underperformed U.S. equities in the past year as investors realized there is no such thing as a one way ticket. The underperformance occurred in spite of promising outlooks early in 2013 as per the global PMIs. Things changed radically in May after Ben Bernanke murmured “taper” for the first time and speculative funds got the jitters.

Nearly 12 months later, EM PMIs remain in contraction territory while the economic momentum has seemingly shifted to developed countries which now boast generally expansionary PMI readings, nearly opposite to their January 2013 levels (the RBC Capital table dates before the release of the U.S. February ISM at 53.2).

But EMs are primarily exporters to the DMs making the current situation rather awkward if not unstable. It may also be that the combination of a Chinese slowdown with the huge devaluation of the yen has shifted market shares in South East Asia. We will know shortly since losing countries will need to address their new found inability to compete.

image

China Export Prowess Wanes in U.S., Europe

The Made in China label is losing traction with its two biggest customers. After three decades of gains, China’s share of U.S. imports has plateaued and in Europe it’s in decline.

The steepest losses are in the European Union, where China’s share of imports slumped to 16.5 percent in the first 11 months of last year, from a 2010 high of 18.5 percent, according to data compiled by Bloomberg News. In the U.S. the needle has barely moved in the past five years, holding around 19 percent.

China’s low-cost vantage has been blunted by rising wages and an appreciating currency, with cheaper nations including Vietnam and Bangladesh competing to sell products from T-shirts to shoes. (…) The yuan has appreciated about 35 percent against the dollar since July 2005, wages have tripled in the past decade and China’s labor force has begun to shrink. (…)

The nation’s working-age population began declining in 2012, Chinese government data show. The pool of 15- to 39-year-olds — the backbone of factories making clothes and toys — has contracted by 35 million in the past five years, a U.S. estimate indicates.

The changes have led global manufacturers to begin shifting production to countries such as Bangladesh and Vietnam, which surpassed China in 2010 as the largest supplier of Nike Inc. footwear.

Higher costs and wages in China are prompting some Asian companies to set up manufacturing plans in neighboring countries. Samsung Electronics Co. is building a $2 billion plant in Vietnam that may make 120 million handsets by 2015.

U.S. and European clothing makers are also looking elsewhere. Some 72 percent of chief purchasing officers who oversee a collective $39 billion in annual purchases for apparel firms expected to shift to lower-cost nations — with Bangladesh, Vietnam and India as the top three destinations for the coming five years, a survey conducted by advisory firm McKinsey & Co. in 2013 shows. (…)

So,

Will China move to stimulate its economy?

(…) Stephen Green, head of Greater China research at Standard Chartered, said that a sharp easing in interbank interest rates in recent days may be an early indication that Beijing is preparing a more supportive economic policy. Further actions could include a cut in bank required reserve ratios – which would release more liquidity into the economy – and an invigoration of investment projects under the current five year plan, Green added.

Jianguang Shen, Greater China chief economist at Mizuho Securities, said that the recent depreciation of the renminbi against the US dollar and the decline in interbank rates signified that “monetary policy has started to ease already”. (…)

Several inter-related constraints conspire to make any stimulus initiative by Beijing delicate to execute. Any credit-centric stimulus would risk setting back the progress that China has made in slimming down its sprawling shadow finance system. An investment-centric programme, for its part, could end up compounding the issue of chronic overcapacity in heavy industrial sectors such as steel and cement.

However, analysts said, allowing the slowdown to continue unchecked in an environment of tightening credit could trigger a domino effect of corporate bond and trust product defaults. (…)

Judgments on whether or not Beijing will be able to pull off this balancing act, Botham said, defines the line between China optimists and China pessimists. (…)

Consider that this is a huge,complex ship to manoeuver and that its captains have little experience stirring in such heavy cross-currents…China clearly has decided to depreciate its currency. Others will likely follow.

Thailand cuts rates as others adopt rise

The Bank of Thailand on Wednesday chose to cut its policy rate by 25 bps to 2 per cent – the lowest level since 2011 when the country was battling widespread flooding. The monetary policy committee said in a statement that it was acting to “lend more support to the economy”.

Thai household debt has jumped sharply, from 55 per cent of GDP in 2007 to about 80 per cent now, while the country is also losing market share in exports. (…)

Indonesia and India have already carried out a number of increases since last summer, partly to stem rapid capital outflows sparked by the “taper tantrum” that rocked developing economies globally. Both countries have also been acting to cut stubborn current account deficits – something that can be achieved through lower demand for imported goods.

The Bank of Thailand said the economy was unlikely to grow by even 3% this year, down from a forecast of 4% as recently as November. Thailand saw growth slow to 0.6% YoY in Q4’13, from 2.7% in Q3.

Japan Business Sentiment Soars: A Flash in the Pan or Here to Stay?

Sentiment among large Japanese companies jumped to an all-time high in the January-March period, amid hopes for a consumer spending binge ahead of the April 1 sales tax increase, a government survey showed Wednesday.

The same survey predicts sentiment will drop sharply to become pessimistic overall in April-June, the quarter most likely to be hit by a fall in consumption under the higher tax. The results also indicate, however, that the setback to sentiment will be short-lived, with a quick recovery in the following quarter returning the index to a positive figure. Government officials say there’s no reason to doubt the results, based on a poll of 8,240 companies.

Hmmm…here’s a reason to doubt:

Japanese Consumer Pessimism Hits New High Under Abe Japan Inc. may be whistling a happy tune on the back of robust profit growth and a weaker yen, but a key survey shows that consumers aren’t in a similar Abenomics-induced state of rapture.

(…) The Cabinet Office’s monthly Consumer Confidence Index contracted for the third straight month in February to 38.2. That’s the worst reading since Mr. Abe entered office in January 2013 and the lowest since September 2011. Respondents were even more pessimistic than during Mr. Abe’s year-long term as prime minister between September 2006 and September 2007.

Undercutting hopes that consumers would have a greater urge to get in some last-minute shopping ahead of a sales tax increase in April, sentiment toward buying durable goods fell sharply in February, continuing a trend that started in October. (…)

More from Japan Business Survey:

But the survey has less encouraging news too. It predicts the bumper profits currently being enjoyed by corporate Japan will soon come to an end. For the fiscal year starting in April, pretax profits at big businesses are expected to fall 4.8%, following a 24% jump in the current fiscal year, as sales are expected to dip 0.1%, after a 4.0% gain this year. The results suggest that the cheap yen effect engineered by the government of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and the Bank of Japan has largely run its course.

Capital expenditure is also forecast to fall 5.1% in the new fiscal year, following an estimated 9.9% jump in the current fiscal year.

Sarcastic smile But there are reasons to doubt that:

Officials note, however, that capital expenditure estimates in the survey tend to start very low and rise as the year progresses. The minus 5.1% forecast is actually better than the minus 6.5% predicted at the beginning of the current fiscal year. (…)

Why a Jump in South Korea’s Jobless Rate is a Good Sign In South Korea, a jump in the unemployment rate is being seen as a positive economic indicator, because it shows a surge in the number of people looking for work.

The government said Wednesday that the seasonally adjusted unemployment rate surged to 3.9% in February from 3.2% a month earlier, its highest level in almost four years. (…)

The number of employed rose 835,000 in February from a year earlier — the fastest growth since March 2002 — but the labor market was unable to fully absorb the surge in job seekers. The country’s population of those employed or actively seeking employment increased by a record 1.02 million.

South Korean officials noted that the jump in job seekers was also due to a new set of college graduates entering the labor market. (…)

The central bank expects the economy to grow 3.8% this year and 4% in 2015, up from 2.8% last year.

As Ed Yardeni’s chart illustrate, EMs seem to be in “buy low” territory.

But there are so many moving parts in this story, including the highly murky China situation, that I don’t see a solid enough story to reduce the high uncertainty risk. First rule in investing is “Don’t lose money”. Second rule: “Never forget rule #1”.

If you are still wavering, being attracted by apparent low valuations, you should read Prem Watsa’s piece on China that I will post today (here). When (not if) things unravel in China, the world will change tremendously. Also, remember that the above valuation chart use FORWARD earnings.

CANADIAN HOUSING
Why the doomsayers are wrong about Canada’s housing market

A Globe and Mail analysis has found that a key measure, used by economists, underestimates the degree to which rents have been rising in the market. That inflates what is known as the price-to-rent ratio, feeding into fears that the market is overheated.

A report to be released Wednesday by housing economist Will Dunning reaches a similar conclusion, going further and arguing that price growth likely has been overestimated.

Economists believe house prices are too high: Rock-bottom interest rates have spurred consumers to take on more mortgage debt than they otherwise might. (…)

But the most bearish diagnoses of the market have been relying on flawed uses of data.

A report by New York-based economists for Deutsche Bank declared in December that Canadian home prices were overvalued by 60 per cent – the most in the world – with Belgium next at 56 per cent. “Canada is in trouble,” it warned.

It looked at a variety of indicators to assess Canada, including the debt-to-income ratio and record condo construction. But the conclusion that home prices topped the global list for overvaluation was based on two measures, price-to-rent and price-to-income. The report said that the price-to-rent ratio was 88 per cent above its historical average, and the price-to-income ratio 32 per cent above its historical average. The economists averaged those two numbers, and got 60.

They gathered rent data from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, which in turn got the numbers from Statistics Canada, which compiles them for use in the consumer price index, a measure of inflation.

The data estimate price changes for a “constant quality” of rental units (comparing apples-to-apples units over time, or what economists call a “matched sample”). Statistics Canada says it is not meant to be a measure of change in prevailing market rents, and might not capture the shift away from apartments toward rented condos in cities such as Toronto.

The average rent for a two-bedroom apartment in the Toronto area last fall was $1,213 while the average rent for a two-bedroom condo was $1,752, according to Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp.

“Like the CPI in general, the rent index provides a measure of aggregate price change holding the quality of products constant (i.e., ‘pure price change’),” a Statistics Canada information officer said by e-mail. “Inferences concerning the change in the average prevailing market rents is not something that the rent index is designed to provide.”

Erwin Diewart, an economics professor at the University of British Columbia, says the federal agency should be taking depreciation into account since it is tracking a constant quality of product. (As the units age, their quality deteriorates and that should be factored in, or rent inflation is understated).

Even ignoring condos, the Statistics Canada rental index underestimates the market rise in rents, said economist Benjamin Tal of Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce.

Mr. Tal calculated the price-to-rent ratio using apartment rents from CMHC. “Rent has risen twice as fast based on CMHC data than on CPI data,” he said. “The CPI numbers definitely understate the increase in rent … These numbers are widely used.”

The CMHC numbers are difficult to work with. The housing agency releases separate measures for apartment and condo rents. Mr. Tal used apartments, compiling data from various Canadian cities and then weighting them by population to arrive at what he believes is a reasonable national measure of rents.

Deutsche Bank’s analysis also relied on recent price data from the Teranet/National Bank house price index, and older data from the department of finance. Teranet seeks to go beyond averages by using a “matched” sample that tries to ensure a constant quality is being compared, only including homes that have sold twice.

It tries to factor out fluctuations that would occur in average prices from changes in the types and locations of homes that are selling. But Mr. Dunning argues that the price index is still exposed to bias because the actual quality of properties might have changed, for instance through renovations.

“The result might be that renovations of existing housing are causing the Teranet/National bank index to over-estimate the rate of house price growth in Canada,” writes Mr. Dunning, who has his own housing research business and is chief economist of the Canadian Association of Accredited Mortgage Professionals, which represents mortgage brokers.

“The price-to-rent ratio in Canada is indeed at an historic high,” but not nearly as far above its historic average as the OECD data would suggest, he concludes.

He also argues that measures of housing affordability have been distorted because economists are using posted mortgage rates (which have been about 5 per cent recently) as opposed to market rates (which for five-year fixed-rate mortgages have been in the neighbourhood of 3.5 per cent), making housing look less affordable.

Mr. Dunning is at the bullish end of the spectrum. He goes on to suggest that house prices are “justified based on record low levels of interest rates,” and might even be under-valued. (…)

Is political risk driving the loonie?

(…) The possibility of Quebec separating from the rest of Canada. It has been more than two decades since the question of Quebec succession has been front-page news. However, the spring election in Quebec, in which the Parti Québécois is expected to win a majority, has reopened the issue.

International investors, now better schooled in the macroeconomic issues of separation thanks to the upcoming Scotland sovereignty vote, could well be taking a skeptical look at the next developed-market country likely to become embroiled in such a debate. Scotland and Quebec bear many similarities, including cultural distinctiveness compared to the rest of their country, and a wealth of natural resource – base commodities in the case of Canada and off-shore energy in Scotland.

With the sovereignty debate gaining momentum in Scotland ahead of the September vote and polls showing some possibility of success for the separatists, the currency markets could now be pricing in the possibility of a similar debate in Quebec. And since the investment view is forming outside of Canada rather than within, the currency market may be ahead of other financial markets, including bonds and equities, in discounting such a possibility. (…) 

Buyback Binge Takes a Breather U.S. companies authorized $80 billion in stock buybacks last month, a 32% drop from last year’s record-setting amount but also the third-strongest February on record, according to data compiled by Birinyi Associates Inc.

(…) There were 140 companies that authorized buybacks in February, compared to 130 authorizations in the same period a year ago. But as the chart below shows, the $80 billion in authorizations fell below the $117.8 billion amount that was authorized in February 2013, the highest monthly total in records dating back to 1985, according to Birinyi,  a Westport, Conn.-based market research firm.

Buybacks have an even more direct effect than dividends on companies’ share prices because they can boost earnings-per-share, a closely watched measure of profitability, by reducing shares outstanding, although some companies use the stock they buy to deliver shares to executives who exercise stock options.

But skeptics deride buybacks. They say the cash could be deployed in a more efficient manner; investing in research and development or buying an existing company are two options. And companies have a history of buying back shares at the wrong time. At the end of 2007, buyback activity was near record levels just as stocks were in the early stages of a precipitous drop.

Birinyi predicts buyback authorizations are running at a full-year annualized rate of $745 billion. That’s comparable to last year’s figure and well above $477 billion in authorizations in 2012.

The financial sector had 57 authorization programs last month, the largest among the S&P 500′s 10 large-cap sectors. Industrials had the greatest amount in dollar terms, coming in at $32 billion, Birinyi said. (Charts above from Birinyi Associates)

The next chart rom RBC Capital Markets illustrates that corporations continue to favour buybacks over dividends, in spite of their pretty poor timing record.

image

EARNINGS WATCH
Engine of Wall Street profits sputters Investment banks face 25% fall in quarterly fixed income revenues

Wall Street’s once lucrative fixed income divisions are set for their worst start to the year since before the financial crisis, with revenue declines of up to 25 per cent prompting banks to plan more redundancies on top of the tens of thousands of job cuts they have already made.

Citigroup and JPMorgan Chase have warned publicly that fixed income revenues – the engine of most investment banks’ profits since 2000 – will be down by double digits when they report first-quarter earnings next month. But other banks privately warn that their year-on-year declines could exceed 25 per cent after both institutional investors and banks shied away from trading. The first quarter is traditionally a high point for revenues.

Chevron raises projection for oil price Costs are rising and politics are constraining development

(…) John Watson, the chief executive, told analysts at a meeting in New York that the company was “bullish on oil” because of output declines at mature fields, political constraints on production in many parts of the world, and the rising cost of finding and developing new oilfields.

Chevron has raised the price assumption it uses when setting out its projections for investors from $79 per barrel for internationally traded Brent crude to $110 per barrel, its average over the past three years.

That is significantly higher than is implied by the futures market, which shows that the price of oil is expected to fall. (…)

Break-even prices for new oil developments could be over $100 per barrel, he said, after industry costs had doubled in the past decade.

The company showed a slide indicating break-even Brent crude prices for different types of oil, suggesting that US shale oil production needed about $65-$85 per barrel, while projects in Canada’s oil sands could need up to $100 and in deep water up to $110 per barrel to break even.(…)

SENTIMENT WATCH
By Barry RitholtzHow Market Tops Get Made

With all the bubble chatter and talks of over-valued stock markets, I thought it was time to have a discussion with someone expert on the subject. In this case, that person would be Paul Desmond, chief strategist and president of Lowry’s Research.

Desmond has spent the past five decades analyzing markets; his research is widely regarded as both unique and insightful, winning numerous awards from various technicians’ groups. If you want additional background into his thinking process, have a read of the long interview I did with him in 2006 (Part I and Part II)

(…)  He notes the health of a bull market can be observed by watching internal indicators that provide insight into the overall appetite for equity accumulation.

These four include:

1. New 52-Week Highs

2. Market Breadth (Advanced/Decline Line)

3. Capitalization: Small Cap, Mid Cap, Large Cap

4. Percentage of Stocks at 20 percent or greater from their recent highs

(…) What does all this mean for the current run? According to Lowry’s, “the weight of evidence continues to suggest a healthy primary uptrend with no end in sight.” For those concerned with a market top, that is rather bullish.

A few caveats about Desmond’s studies: Although he is rigorous and empirically driven, these data points all come from past market behavior. There are no guarantees that in the future, markets — that means you, Humans — will continue to operate the same way. Perhaps the changing structure of markets might impact market internals. Maybe the rise of ETFs will have an impact. Regardless, there are no guarantees the bull will continue.

However, based on the data Desmond follows, he makes a fairly convincing case that this bull market still has a ways to go before it tops out.

On the other hand, there are more and more such stories these days:

Zerohedge strikes again, posting an analysis from Citron Research (great name) unplugging PLUG:

Who is behind PLUG, and what do they do? This is simple: Plug Power sells fuel cell-powered forklifts …with fuel cells they acquire from Ballard Power. Nothing fancy here, folks. Same business model since the 2000 crash … Well over a decade as a public company, during which they have lost close to $850 million, while developing no IP or meaningful revenue growth.Profitability? Forget about it! (…)

Plug Power (PLUG):
Trades at 61x revenues
Market cap, fully diluted, (remember the warrants) currently valued $1.6 Billion

In the same vein, here’s a table from Fairfax Financial’s Prem Watsa’s letter to shareholders (thanks Gary). For those who don’t know Prem Watsa, he is often regarded as the Canadian Warren Buffett owing to his 21.3% compound annual growth rate since 1985.image

  • Candy Crush seeks $7.6bn value in IPO

King, the London-based games developer behind the addictive app Candy Crush Saga, said it plans to raise as much as $530m in a US initial public offering that would value the company at almost $7.6bn at the top of its pricing range. (…)

More than three-quarters of King’s gross revenues coming from a single game: Candy Crush Saga.

Prem writes:

This sort of speculation will end just like the previous tech boom in 1999 – 2000 – very badly!

Oh! there is also this:

G7 to warn Russia over Crimea occupation Stage set for diplomatic stand-off ahead of referendum
Russia dashes diplomatic hopes Kremlin says Crimea parliament’s independence intent ‘legitimate’

NEW$ & VIEW$ (31 JANUARY 2014)

U.S. Banks Loosen Loan Standards Big banks are beginning to loosen their tight grip on lending, creating a new opening for consumer and business borrowing that could underpin a brightening economic outlook.

(…) In both the U.S. and Europe, new reports released Thursday show banks are slowly starting to increase their appetite for risk. The U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency said banks relaxed the criteria for businesses and consumers to obtain credit during the 18 months leading up to June 30, 2013, while the European Central Bank said fewer banks in the euro zone were reporting tightened lending standards to nonfinancial businesses in the fourth quarter of 2013.

(…)  The comptroller’s report said it would still classify most banks’ standards as “good or satisfactory” but did strike a cautionary tone. (…)

An upturn in bank lending, if taken too far, could also lead to inflation. The Fed has flooded banks with trillions of dollars in cash in its efforts to boost the economy. In theory, the printing of that money would cause consumer price inflation to take off, but it hasn’t, largely because banks haven’t aggressively lent out the money. (…)

John G. Stumpf, CEO of Wells Fargo & Co., said on a Jan. 14 conference call with analysts that he is “hearing more, when I talk with customers, about their interest in building something, adding something, investing in something.”

Kelly King, chief executive of BB&T Corp., told analysts two days later, “we really believe that we are at a pivotal point in the economy…admittedly that’s substantially intuitive.” (…)

The comptroller’s survey found more banks loosening standards than tightening. The regulator said that in the 18 months leading up to June 30, 2013, its examiners saw more banks offering more attractive loans.

The trend extended to credit-card, auto and large corporate loans but not to residential mortgages and home-equity loans. (…)

The OCC’s findings are consistent with more recent surveys: The Fed’s October survey of senior U.S. loan officers found a growing number loosening standards for commercial and industrial loans, often by narrowing the spread between the interest rate on the loan and the cost of funds to the bank.

The ECB’s quarterly survey, which covered 133 banks, showed that the net percentage of euro-zone banks reporting higher lending standards to nonfinancial businesses was 2% in the fourth quarter, compared with 5% in the third quarter. (…)

U.S. Starts to Hit Growth Stride

A potent mix of rising exports, consumer spending and business investment helped the U.S. economy end the year on solid footing.

Gross domestic product, the broadest measure of goods and services churned out by the economy, grew at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 3.2% in the fourth quarter, the Commerce Department said. That was less than the third quarter’s 4.1% pace, but overall the final six months of the year delivered the strongest second half since 2003, when the economy was thriving.

Growth Story

A big driver of growth in the fourth quarter was a rise in consumer spending, which grew 3.3%, the fastest pace in three years. Consumer spending accounts for roughly two-thirds of economic activity.

The spike in Q4 consumer spending is very surprising, and suspicious. Let’s se how it gets revised.

Consider these nest 2 items:

(…) For the 14-week period ending Jan. 31, Wal-Mart expects both Wal-Mart U.S. and Sam’s Club same-store sales, without fuel, to be slightly negative, compared with prior guidance. It previously estimated Wal-Mart U.S. guidance for same-store sales to be relatively flat, and Sam’s expected same-store sales to be between flat and 2%.

A number of U.S. retail and restaurant companies have lamented poor winter weather and aggressive discounts, resulting in fewer store visits and lower sales. Many of those companies either lowered their full-year expectations or offered preliminary fourth-quarter targets that missed Wall Street’s expectations.

Wal-Mart warned the sales impact from the reduction in the U.S. government Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits that went into effect Nov. 1 was greater than expected. The retailer also said that eight named winter storms resulted in store closures that hurt traffic throughout the quarter.

Wal-Mart Stores Inc. warned that it expects fourth-quarter earnings to meet or fall below the low end of its prior forecast, citing government cuts to assistance programs and the harsh winter weather.

Amazon earned $239 million, or 51 cents a share, on sales that were up 20% at $25.59 billion. The 51 cents a share were far below Street consensus of 74 cents, and the $239 million profit on $25 billion in sales illustrates just how thin the company’s margins are.

A year ago, Amazon earned $97 million, or 21 cents a share, on sales of $21.29 billion.

The company also forecast first-quarter sales of $18.2-$19.9 billion; Street consensus was for $19.67 billion. In other words, most of that projection is below Street consensus.

It projected its net in a range of an operating loss of $200 million to an operating profit of $200 million.

Surprised smile AMZN earned $239M in 2013 and projects 2014 between –$200M and +$200M. You can drive a truck in that range. But how about the revenue range for Q1’14:

Net sales grew 20 percent to $25.6 billion in the fourth quarter, versus expectations for just above $26 billion and slowing from the 24 percent of the previous three months.

North American net sales in particular grew 26 percent to $15.3 billion, from 30 percent or more in the past two quarters.

Amazon also forecast revenue growth of between 13 and 24 per cent in the next quarter, compared to the first quarter 2013.

Notwithstanding what that means for AMZN investors, one must be concerned for what that means for U.S. consumer spending. Brick-and-mortar store sales have been pretty weak in Q4 and many thought that online sales would save the day for the economy. Amazon is the largest online retailer, by far, and its growth is slowing fast and its sales visibility is disappearing just as fast.

image

Back to AMZN itself, our own experience at Christmas revealed that Amazon prices were no longer systematically the lowest. We bought many items elsewhere last year, sometimes with a pretty large price gap with Amazon. Also, Amazon customers are now paying sales taxes in just about every states, closing the price gap further. And now this:

To cover rising fuel and transport costs, the company is considering a $20 to $40 increase in the annual $79 fee it charges users of its “Prime” two-day shipping and online media service, considered instrumental to driving online purchases of both goods and digital media.

“Customers like the service, they’re using it a lot more, and so that’s the reason why we’re looking at the increase.” Confused smile

U.S. Pending Home Sales Hit By Winter Storms

The National Association of Realtors (NAR) reported that December pending sales of single-family homes plunged 8.7% m/m following a 0.3% slip in November, revised from a 0.2 rise. It was the seventh consecutive month of decline.

Home sales fell hard across the country last month. In the Northeast a 10.3% decline (-5.5% y/y) was logged but strength earlier in the year lifted the full year average by 6.2%. Sales out West declined 9.8% (-16.0% y/y) and for the full year fell 4.1%. Sales down South posted an 8.8% (-6.9 y/y) falloff but for all of 2013 were up 5.4%. In the Midwest, December sales were off 6.8% (6.9% y/y) yet surged 10.4% for the year.

Punch Haver’s headline suggests that weather was the main factor but sales were weak across the U.S. and have been weak for since the May taper announcement.

Mortgage Volumes Hit Five Year Low The volume of home mortgages originated during the fourth quarter fell to its lowest level in five years, according to an analysis published Thursday by Inside Mortgage Finance, an industry newsletter.

(…) Volumes tumbled by 19% in the third quarter, fell by another 34% in the fourth quarter, according to the tally. (…)

Overall originations in 2013 stood at nearly $1.9 trillion, down nearly 11% from 2012 but still the second best year for the industry since the mortgage bust deepened in 2008. The Mortgage Bankers Association forecasts originations will fall to $1.1 trillion, the lowest level in 14 years.

The report also showed that the nation’s largest lenders continued to account for a shrinking share of mortgage originations, at around 65.3% of all loans, down from over 90% in 2008.

Euro-Zone Inflation Returns to Record Low

Annual inflation rate falls to a record low in January, a development that will increase pressure on the ECB to act more decisively to head off the threat of falling prices.

The European Union’s statistics agency said Friday consumer prices rose by just 0.7% in the 12 months to January, down from an 0.8% annual rate of inflation in December, and further below the ECB’s target of just under 2.0%.

Excluding energy, prices rose 1.0%, while prices of food, alcohol and tobacco increased 1.7% and prices of services were 1.1% higher.

image

Pointing up Figures also released Friday showed retail sales fell 2.5% in Germany during December. The result was far worse than the unchanged reading expected from a Wall Street Journal poll of experts. In annual terms, retail sales fell 2.4%, the data showed. It was the first annual decline in German sales since June.

Consumer spending also fell in France as households cut purchases of clothes and accessories, although by a more modest 0.1%.

Benchmark Japan inflation rate hits 1.3%
December figure brings Bank of Japan closer to 2% goal

Average core inflation for all of 2013, a measure that excludes the volatile price of fresh food, was 0.4 per cent, according to the interior ministry. (…)

Much of the inflation so far has been the result of the precipitous fall in the yen that took hold in late 2012, making imports more expensive. Energy prices, in particular, have risen sharply: Japan buys virtually all of its oil and gas abroad, and the post-Fukushima shutdown of the country’s nuclear industry has further increased the need for fossil fuels.

So-called “core-core” consumer prices, which strip out the cost of both food and energy, rose by 0.7 per cent in December.

SENTIMENT WATCH

Individual Investors Head For the Hills

(…) In this week’s poll, bullish sentiment declined from 38.12% down to 32.18%.  This represents the fourth weekly decline in the five weeks since bullish sentiment peaked on 12/26/13 at 55.06%.  While bullish sentiment declined, the bearish camp became more crowded rising from 23.76% to 32.76%.

With this week’s increase, bearish sentiment is now greater than bullish sentiment for the first time since mid-August.  The most interesting aspect about these two periods is what provoked the increase in cautiousness.  Back then it was concerns over Syria that were weighing on investor sentiment.  Fast forwarding to today, the big issue weighing on investors’ minds is now centered on Syria’s neighbor to the North (Turkey).  For such a small area of the world, this region continues to garners a lot of attention.

THE JANUARY BAROMETER (Contn’d) Sleepy smile

January Slump Is Nothing to Fret Over

The old Wall Street adage — as January goes, so goes the rest of the year – needs to be put to rest.

Since 1950, there have been 24 years in which the S&P 500 fell in January, according to Jonathan Krinsky, chief market technician at MKM Partners. While the S&P 500 finished 14 of those years in the red, a look at the performance from February through the end of the year provides evidence to buoy investors. In 13 of those 24 years, stocks rose over the final 11 months.

“All else being equal, a down January is less than 50% predictive that the rest of the year will close lower than where it closed in January,” Mr. Krinsky said. (…)

Long time reader Don M. sent me even better stuff on the January Barometer. Hanlon Investment Management must have had many clients asking about that since they made a thorough analysis of the “phenomenon”. Here it is for your Super Bowl conversation:

(…) What was found is that from 1950 until 1984, years where the month of January saw a positive return were predictive of a positive return for the entire year with approximately 90% probability.  The years with a negative return in January were predictive of a negative return for the year approximately 70% of the time.

In the intervening time since 1984, market action has caused the predictive power of negative returns in January to fall to around 50%, which is nothing more than chance.  However, positive returns in January have still retained their predictive power for positive returns for the year.

Yet still, there is another group of people who advocate that just the first five trading days of January are predictive of the rest of the year.  We took data from 1950 through 2013 for the S&P 500 Index and then calculated both positive and negative results on a weekly and monthly basis.

For the 64 years from 1950 through 2013, a positive return in January was predictive of a positive return for the year 92.5% of the time.  A positive return during the first five trading days of January was predictive of a positive return for the year 90.0% of the time.  A negative return in January was predictive of a negative return for the year 54.2% of the time-basically not predictive at all.  A negative return during the first five trading days of January was predictive only 50% of the time, amounting to nothing more than a flip of a coin.

But what if we filter the results by requiring both a positive return during the first five trading days of January and a positive return in January for a positive signal?  Conversely, we may require a negative return during the first five trading days of January and a negative return for January to generate a negative signal.   When the first week and the month of January both have positive returns, then the signal is predictive 93.5% of the time for a positive year: a slight improvement over 92.5%.

Even more interesting is that when you require both a negative return in the first week and a negative return in January to give a signal.  Though the number of signals is reduced from 24 to 15, the success ratio improves from 54.2% to 73.3%.  The median and average returns for predicted years are listed in the summary statistics table, along with their respective success percentages, on the following page.  This will give you a something to ponder as we begin 2014.

How about negative first week and positive month? And what’s wrong with the last five days of January? Then insert the result of the Super Bowl. There you go!

Thanks Don.

Investors pull billions from EM stocks Dedicated EM funds hit as equity outflows reach highest since 2011 (Via FT Alphaville)

SocGen’s cross-asset research team believes that when it comes to EM outflows they may have only just begun:

As the team notes on Friday, this is especially so given the Fed doesn’t appear to care about the EM sell-off:

Since cumulative inflows into EM equity funds reached a peak of $220bn in February last year, $60bn of funds have fled elsewhere. Given the exceptionally strong link between EM equity performance and flows, we think it plausible that funds are currently withdrawing double that from EM equity (see chart below). EM bond funds face a similar fate. For reasons discussed in our latest Multi Asset Snapshot (EM assets still at risk – don’t catch the falling knife), we see no early end to EM asset de-rating. Furthermore, the Fed remains assertive on execution of tapering despite recent turmoil within the EM world, which spells more turbulence ahead.

And if it keeps going, balance of payments issues could emerge as a result:

A close look at Global EM funds indicates that all EM markets are suffering outflows Mutual fund and ETF investors in EMs both favour global EM funds. Regional or country specialisation is less common (less than 47% of global EM assets). The implication is that all EM markets face outflows currently, with little discrimination between the countries that are most exposed and those which are more defensive. We think Balance of Payment issues may emerge as an important factor going forward.

Though, what is EM’s loss seems to be Europe’s gain at the moment:

Europe reaps the benefits While current EM volatility is impacting developed markets as well, some of the flows are being redirected toward Europe, notably into Italy, Spain and the UK.

The notable difference with taper tantrum V.2, of course, is that US yields are compressing:

Which might suggest that what the market got really wrong during taper tantrum V.1, was that a reduction in QE would cause a US bond apocalypse. This was a major misreading of the underlying fundamentals and tantamount to some in the market giving away top-quality yield to those who knew better.

Taper at its heart is disinflationary for the US economy, and any yield sell-off makes the relative real returns associated with US bonds more appealing.

That taper V.2 incentivises capital back into the US, at the cost of riskier EM yields, consequently makes a lot of sense.

Though, this will become a problem for the US if the disinflationary pressure gets too big.