The enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it’s the illusion of knowledge (Stephen Hawking)

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so (Mark Twain)

Invest with smart knowledge and objective odds

YOUR DAILY EDGE: 22 May 2025

Euro-Zone Private Sector Unexpectedly Shrinks on Services

The Composite Purchasing Managers’ Index by S&P Global fell to 49.5 from 50.4 in April, dipping below the 50 threshold separating expansion from contraction, data Thursday showed. Analysts had predicted a slight increase to 50.6. (…)

image

Momentum is largely coming from beyond the region’s two biggest economies, with Germany’s PMI reading also wrong-footing analysts by plunging below 50 on a similar pullback in services. France’s, meanwhile, held beneath that threshold for a ninth month.

More from S&P Global:

While the overall fall in output in May followed a period of growth, new orders have now decreased on a monthly basis throughout the past year. The latest decline in new business was modest, but the most pronounced since December 2024.

As was the case with activity, the overall reduction reflected service sector weakness, with new business down for the fourth month running. Manufacturing new orders stabilised, ending a three-year period of decline.

Alongside the fall in total new orders, new business from abroad (which includes intra-Eurozone trade) was also down modestly, with the pace of contraction little changed from that seen in April.

Manufacturing input costs decreased for the second consecutive month, and to the largest extent since March 2024. On the other hand, services input prices were up sharply again, with the pace of inflation slightly stronger than in April. Overall, input costs increased at a broadly similar pace to that seen in the previous month, with inflation just below the series average.

The pace of output price inflation, meanwhile, eased to a seven-month low in May. As was the case with input costs, a rise in services charges contrasted with a fall in manufacturing selling prices, the first in three months. Output prices decreased in France, but continued to rise in Germany and the rest of the Eurozone.

Japan’s private sector slips back into contraction in May

Japan’s private sector fell back into contraction territory for the second time in the past three months in May, according to the latest au Jibun Bank Flash PMI data. While only slight, the reduction in overall output reflected a steeper fall in manufacturing output alongside a weaker expansion of service sector activity.

Demand conditions also looked more fragile, with new business measured across both manufacturing and service sectors falling for the first time in nearly a year, and foreign demand declining for the second straight month.

At the same time, cost pressures, a source of concern for many firms, remained elevated in May. However, there were some tentative signs that input price inflation is cooling, with the latest data showing the slowest rise in operating expenses in over a year. This translated into a softer uptick in selling prices.

Business confidence across Japan’s private sector was meanwhile the second-lowest recorded since the initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, with uncertainty around the future trade environment and foreign demand clouding the outlook and dampening output projections for the year ahead.”

image

OPEC+ Discusses Another Super-Sized Output Hike for July

An output hike of 411,000 barrels a day for July — triple the amount initially planned — is among options under discussion, although no final agreement has yet been reached, said the delegates, asking not to be named because the information is private. A final decision is due to be taken at a gathering on June 1.

The cartel has helped sink crude prices since announcing 411,000-barrel hikes for May and June — equivalent to about 1% of current OPEC+ output — in a historic break with years of defending oil markets. Oil made a fresh plunge on Thursday, dropping 0.9% to $64.31 a barrel as of 9:13 a.m. in London. (…)

While OPEC+ says the supply increases are to satisfy demand, officials have privately proffered a range of motives, from punishing over-producing members to recouping market share and placating President Donald Trump.

Group leader Saudi Arabia warned errant members such as Kazakhstan and Iraq at their last meeting that it could deliver further production increases unless they fall in line with their quotas. Despite some promises of atonement, the Kazakhs have made little effort to rein in international oil companies operating in the country and continue to export near record levels. (…)

Actually, Trump would be happy if oil prices decline further. Putin not so much.

The Fortress That China Built for Its Battle with America Beijing is racing ahead in advanced technology, including in robots, satellites and AI—and in some cases is catching up with the U.S.

The storm clouds for China were gathering when leader Xi Jinping convened the country’s top scientists at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing in May 2018. The U.S. was beginning to clamp down on selling technology to China, with more restrictions on the way.

China must not be forced to beg others for technology, Xi said. Only through self-reliance “can we fundamentally safeguard national economic security,” he said.

Since then, China has raced ahead in many strategic sectors—and in some cases is catching up with the U.S. Its electric-car companies are among the world’s best. Chinese AI startups rival OpenAI and Google. The country’s biologists are pushing the boundaries of pharmaceutical research, and its factories are being filled with advanced robotics.

At sea, Chinese-made cargo vessels dominate global shipping. In space, the country has been launching hundreds of satellites to monitor every corner of the Earth. Beyond frontier technology, Beijing is pursuing greater self-reliance in food and energy, and has bulked up its military. (…)

The advances are making China less dependent on the rest of the world for goods and services. Imports overall fell to less than 18% of gross domestic product in 2023 compared with about 22% a decade earlier. (…)

In 2015, a policy dubbed “Made in China 2025” identified 10 sectors as national priorities, including robotics, aerospace and new-energy vehicles.

Xi took on a more nationalistic tone after Trump launched a trade war against China in 2018. Calls for “self-reliance” became more prominent, especially after the pandemic struck, leading China to largely close its borders. Chinese officials gained confidence that their economy could survive reduced contact with the outside world when it grew 2.2% in 2020, the only major economy to expand that year.

China’s resolve strengthened in the Biden years, as Washington sought to work with European allies to choke off China’s access to advanced technologies such as semiconductors. “Western countries, led by the U.S., have implemented all-around containment, encirclement and suppression against us,” Xi said in 2023. He warned China to prepare for “extreme scenarios,” a thinly-veiled reference to the risk of conflict with the U.S.

Much of China’s success stems from its ability to direct enormous sums of money to prized sectors.

Last year, China invested $500 billion on research and development, triple from when Xi took office in 2012. China spends nearly as much on R&D as the U.S., adjusting for purchasing power parity, according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

image

Investment in AI is a major focus. One study last year found that Chinese government venture-capital funds invested nearly $200 billion across 9,600 AI firms between 2000 and 2023.

Local government investment arms have helped the push, backing companies such as Zhipu AI—one of the Chinese AI firms rivaling U.S. companies. The AI startups are also taking in capital from private venture funds and Chinese companies such as Alibaba and Tencent.

China’s technology push is boosting its manufacturing prowess. Chinese companies have been buying as many industrial robots as the rest of the world combined, enabling some factory owners to experiment with highly automated plants that can operate in the dark. For much of the past decade, three-quarters of the robots installed in China came from foreign manufacturers, such as in Japan or Germany. By 2023, Chinese robot makers captured nearly half of the local market, according to the International Federation of Robotics. (…)

[Shenzhen-based] UBTech says that 90% of its more than 3,000 suppliers in recent years were based in China—a sign of how much China can rely on its own growing ecosystem of suppliers. The company is also incorporating technology from Chinese artificial-intelligence pioneer DeepSeek to help the robots make better decisions.

The self-sufficiency drive extends to highly sensitive areas such as nuclear power. At the Sanmen nuclear power plant, 150 miles south of Shanghai, the first two reactors put under construction in 2009 came from Pennsylvania-based Westinghouse, with key components shipped from the U.S. and American engineers on-site to help get the project online.

The next two reactors were also based on Westinghouse’s technology. Now, a new pair will be totally Chinese. Known as Hualong One, China’s homegrown reactor model allows Beijing to better control costs and construction timelines, while eliminating the danger that the U.S. could one day refuse to sell China more reactors.

Efficient government coordination, readily available financing from state banks and a highly-developed nuclear supply chain means China has already managed to build some Hualong One reactors in about five or six years. The latest Westinghouse reactors in the U.S. took more than a decade to complete, at far higher costs.

In many emerging sectors, China seeks to go beyond government subsidies and other financial support, pushing companies to compete with each other to boost efficiency and innovation.

Two of China’s leading battery makers, Contemporary Amperex Technology and BYD, have disclosed several billion dollars in subsidies between them over the past three years. At the same time, they say they have spent more than $20 billion combined on R&D. (…)

Last year, when a group of U.S. think tanks ranked the world’s best such commercial satellite systems, Chinese firms won five out of 11 gold medals. The U.S. had four. (…)

In its push for self-sufficiency, China now has roughly two-thirds of global corn reserves, despite only having about 17% of the world’s population, and has built massive stockpiles of oil and metals. It is slowly expanding the use of its yuan currency in foreign trade and developing alternatives to Western financial payment systems. The Defense Department estimates that China has tripled its nuclear warhead stockpile to more than 600 in recent years. (…)

Last year, Chinese shipyards delivered 53% of global tonnage, according to shipping-information provider Clarksons Research, compared with 8% in 2002. Those gains reflected decades of state support, including cut-rate prices for land to build shipyards, favorable loans and subsidized steel. The U.S. made up just 0.1% of global commercial tonnage last year.

China’s shipbuilding prowess has helped it to build the world’s largest navy, with more than 370 ships and submarines today. (…)

In 2023, Huawei grabbed U.S. attention when it released a high-end smartphone powered by an advanced processor that industry analysts say was locally produced in China. More recently, it has been gearing up to test a new chip it hopes will be more powerful than Nvidia’s H100 chip, released in 2022.

As China’s chips improve, Morgan Stanley projects the country’s self-sufficiency rate in graphics processing units—essential in creating AI systems—will jump to 82% by 2027 from 11% in 2021. (…)

The inefficient allocation of money has contributed to slowing productivity growth. Absent reforms, China may be able to sustain GDP growth of just 2.8% on average from 2031-2040, according to economists at the International Monetary Fund, compared with an average of around 6% over the past decade. (…)

97% of the article is about smart planning and focused execution, only to conclude that “inefficient allocation of money” could cut growth in half to about 3% per year.

Yet, China spends nearly as much as the US on R&D with a 40% smaller economy on a PPP basis.

US R&D investments totaled $1.1 trillion (21%) more than China’s since 2015. Why did the USA fall behind in so many critical areas? Perhaps less planning, poor execution and less efficient allocation of money.

Meanwhile, China’s debt to GDP, nearly at par with the US 20 years ago is now lower and below the 2010 level:

Annual US corporate pretax profits rose by $1.9T since 2015 thanks to profit margins exploding from 13.9% to 22.3%. Corporate federal taxes rose only $160B.

image

Since 2015, US corporations distributed an increasing share of profits in dividends. This Ed Yardeni chart shows flat undistributed profits post GFC …

image

… but actual retained profits to reinvest were even lower after buybacks which almost doubled in the last 10 years, leaving fewer $ to reinvest while boosting consumption … and the trade deficit.

image

Other Yardeni data reveal that US manufacturers’ profits were flat between 2015 and 2019 but exploded 50% post pandemic. Dividends paid by US manufacturers steadily rose from $250B annualized in 2015 to $350B in 2019 and to nearly $450B in 2024.

 

BYD sells more electric vehicles in Europe than Tesla for first time Chinese car group has been pushing to expand into overseas markets for past few years

(…) “This is a watershed moment for Europe’s car market, particularly when you consider that Tesla has led the European battery electric vehicle market for years, while BYD only officially began operations beyond Norway and the Netherlands in late 2022,” said Felipe Munoz, global analyst at Jato Dynamics. (…)

BYD and other Chinese groups have expanded their product line-up in Europe, increasing the sales of plug-in hybrids, which are not hit by the EU’s higher tariffs. 

Registration of EVs made by Chinese carmakers rose by 59 per cent year-on-year in Europe in April to 15,300 vehicles, while plug-in hybrids increased nearly eight-fold to 9,649 units, according to Jato.

YOUR DAILY EDGE: 21 May 2025

CONSUMER WATCH

May Vehicle Forecast: Sales “Cooling Off” to 15.9 million SAAR

From WardsAuto: U.S. Light-Vehicle Sales Cooling Off in May; Inventory Still Falling (pay content).  Brief excerpt:

With inventory set to continue declining month-to-month, and the cost to automakers of the tariffs more strongly kicking in by July, sales are likely to continue sequential weakness into the summer – unless automakers decide to eat most of the increased cost. Based on the North America production outlook for the next several months, most are not planning to eat a lot of the cost.
emphasis added

On a seasonally adjusted annual rate basis, the Wards forecast of 15.9 million SAAR, would be down 7.9% from last month, and up 0.5% from a year ago.

Car buyers rushed to buy over the previous couple of months to beat the tariffs.  There will be further payback in coming months.

Sales were 15.8M in 2024 and 15.5M in Q1’25. March was 17.8M and April 17.3.

Car sales volumes are only back to pre-pandemic levels but prices are up 32% for used and 20% for new vehicles, pre-tariffs…

image

Nvidia’s Huang Calls U.S. Export Controls a Failure, Praises Trump CEO says American curbs have pushed Beijing to accelerate development of its AI industry

Chief Executive Jensen Huang said U.S. export controls limiting the sale of advanced chips to China have been a failure, and commended President Trump for reversing a core part of the Biden administration’s policy.

The controls have galvanized China to push ahead with building its own artificial-intelligence technologies, and Nvidia has over the past four years lost market share to domestic competitors there, Huang said.

“The local companies are very talented and very determined, and the export controls give them the spirit, energy and the government support to accelerate their development,” Huang said in Taipei, where he is attending an industry conference. (…)

Huang said Wednesday that China was the second-largest computer market globally and would be a $50 billion AI market next year. Revenue from China, he said, could translate to tax dollars and jobs for the U.S. (…)

“America is not the only provider of AI technology,” he said. “If the United States wants to stay in the lead and the U.S. would like the rest of the world to build on American technology, then we would have to maximize AI diffusion, maximize the speed.”

Days after the rule was pulled, American chip makers including Nvidia unveiled deals to sell hundreds of thousands of the most powerful chips in the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia and Qatar during a visit by Trump and Huang to the region.

Still, Nvidia hasn’t gotten everything it wanted from Trump. It said in April it would take a $5.5 billion charge after the Trump administration put new controls on the export of an AI chip that the company had tailored for sale in China.

Huang reiterated his desire to keep serving China, citing its importance to the world’s AI ecosystem.

The Silicon Valley chip executive has crisscrossed the globe over the past month, trying to drum up sales of his AI processors and excitement for his vision of a future driven by AI supercomputers. He has drawn closer to governments around the globe because of the geopolitical importance of AI, standing by Trump’s side in the Middle East and meeting senior Chinese officials.

Bloomberg’s account is more explicit:

Nvidia Corp. chief Jensen Huang blasted the “failure” of US restrictions intended to help contain China’s technological ascent, calling on the White House to lower barriers to AI chip sales before American firms cede that market to up-and-coming rivals such as Huawei Technologies Co.

Huang called for policymakers to propel US AI technology by lowering export barriers aimed at curtailing the rise of a geopolitical rival. Some corners of Washington are receptive to that argument when it applies to countries like Saudi Arabia or the United Arab Emirates, which have close ties to China — but Huang has so far failed to turn the tide of restrictions that specifically target the world’s second largest economy. (…)

Huang’s views align with the likes of White House AI adviser David Sacks, who has pushed for ensuring the world builds its AI tools and applications on an American “tech stack” — a full complement of hardware and services based on US know-how. The Trump administration is rescinding restrictions on Nvidia chip shipments to much of the world, though officials are drafting a replacement framework. (…)

“All in all, the export controls were a failure. The facts would suggest it,” Huang told reporters, in some of his harshest criticism yet of the US campaign. “The US should maximize the speed of AI diffusion. Because if we don’t, the competition will come.”

Pointing up “China has 50% of the world’s AI developers, and it’s important that when they develop on an architecture, they develop on Nvidia, or at least American technology.” (…)

Huang reiterated the warning that if Nvidia can’t sell in China, Huawei and others will fill the gap.

“Power is quite cost-effective in China. And there’s plenty of land. And so the ban on H20 is not effective for that reason,” Huang said.

“They’ll just buy more chips from the startups, from Huawei, and others. And so I really do hope that the US government recognizes that the ban is not effective and give us a chance to go back and win the market.”

(…) “His fortune and misfortune is that he created the most valuable technological input of the decade,” said Barath Harithas, a senior fellow at Washington-based think tank Center for Strategic and International Studies. “The danger is that his visibility becomes a liability. He could end up the fall guy if things unravel in the Gulf, and then face political heat for any perceived overreach in China.” (…)

Huang has pulled off the feat of staying friends with both the U.S. and China, despite tensions between the two superpowers.

In early April, he attended a $1 million-a-head dinner with Trump at Mar-a-Lago, and afterward some inside Nvidia were confident the company could keep selling its H20 chips in China, which had been tailored to comply with earlier U.S. regulations. Instead, the U.S. said a few days later it would restrict the sale of the H20 chips, which led Nvidia to take a $5.5 billion charge in the first quarter.

Within days of the new rule, Huang flew to Beijing and publicly reassured senior Chinese officials the company would “unwaveringly serve” the market there. Later, he met the mayor of Shanghai and left with the city’s blessing to open a new research and development center there.

Huang has repeatedly said China will be a powerhouse in global AI development and it would be folly for Nvidia to neglect the market. Each time new U.S. export controls on advanced semiconductors have been introduced, Nvidia has adapted by downgrading its chips’ specs to continue selling to Chinese customers. (…)

Last week, the Commerce Department put out guidance against the use of American AI chips to train Chinese models and warned against the diversion of such silicon to China.

Harithas of CSIS said the perception of an American executive courting China ran against sentiment in Washington. “If he leans too far toward China with even a neutered chip variant, he risks crossing a red line, triggering public rebuke, or worse, legal blowback,” he said.

INFLATION WATCH

Macho-Pessimists Say Inflation’ll Be Back Tariffs will bring it with an unblinking certitude; the only question is when.

(…) The US has been slapping tariffs on a range of imports for a few months, and that’s already shown up in a sharp increase in the money being paid in import duty:

That is real money for Uncle Sam, and it has been paid by someone. But who, ultimately, will bear the price? (…)

Bloomberg’s survey of professional forecasters shows CPI estimates ticking up ever since the election. They’re only a little above 3%, so this isn’t extreme, but the shift is clear:

(…) Michigan has been logging inflation expectations by partisan identity since 2020, and the swing in the last few months has been spectacular. Trump Derangement Syndrome affects both ends of the spectrum, with Democrats expecting double-digit inflation, while Republicans think price rises could be abolished:

The depth of division is disquieting. But Michigan also polls independents, who suggest something more worrying for the administration. Their forecasts have shot up since the election, even as actual inflation has fallen. Reasonable people, then, expect tariffs to cause inflation:

What looks more encouraging on this chart is that import price inflation has declined slightly. Unfortunately, this doesn’t mean that tariffs won’t hit consumers, because US import prices exclude tariffs. Dario Perkins of TS Lombard in London says: “If Chinese exporters were absorbing them, US import prices would be falling much more sharply. Stability in these metrics means China ISN’T paying.” Apparently calm figures are a reason to expect the tariffs to show up in inflation soon. (…)

In recent posts, I have documented some inflation trends:

  • Import prices excluding food and fuels rose 0.5% in April.
  • Import prices for nonfuel industrial supplies and materials increased 0.8% in April.
  • Import prices for capital goods increased 0.6%.
  • Import prices for consumer goods increased 0.3% in April, the first monthly advance since October 2024.

Note that import prices exclude tariffs.

  • Core goods PPI rose 0.4% after +0.3% in each of February and March. Last 3 months annualized: +4.1% following +2.0% in the previous 8 months when monthly gains were limited to 0.1-0.2%.

Note that Producer Prices exclude imports.

There is clearly price pressures in the goods pipelines.

Walmart, the king of low prices and a Goliath negotiator, warned last week that it plans to raise prices this month and early this summer, when tariff-affected merchandise hits its store shelves.

“The magnitude and speed at which these prices are coming to us is somewhat unprecedented in history,” Walmart Chief Financial Officer John David Rainey said in an interview.

Shoppers could see prices rise by the end of May, “and then certainly much more in June,” Walmart CFO John David Rainey said today in a CNBC interview.

“We’re wired for everyday low prices, but the magnitude of these increases is more than any retailer can absorb,” Walmart CFO John David Rainey told CNBC today.

“Well, if you’ve got a 30% tariff on something, you’re likely going to see double digits [in price increases],” he later told Yahoo Finance.

(…) “Imports are only 14% of the economy — the ability of those types of things to move the needle on inflation are limited,” Stephen Miran, chair of the Council of Economic Advisers, said in an interview on Bloomberg Television’s Surveillance. “We have been introducing tariffs since day-one of this administration. And what we have seen is tariffs have started to come up” yet there’s “been no real meaningful effect on inflation.” (…)

Miran, who previously worked as a senior strategist at hedge fund Hudson Bay Capital, said that American importers “have flexibility,” with the potential to make products domestically or buy them from “other countries that treat us better.” That gives them leverage, he said. (…)

“But over time, we have the leverage — and that’ll allow us to force the burden of the tariffs onto other countries.” (…)

More importantly for Miran is that services inflation might be subdued enough to offset coming goods inflation. Slowing wages and lower oil prices are helping here.

Donald Trump Plays Walmart CEO He goes full Kamala Harris in demanding that the retail giant not raise prices.

The WSJ Editorial Board:

Which American politician said the following?

Item one: “Walmart should STOP trying to blame Tariffs as the reason for raising prices throughout the chain. Walmart made BILLIONS OF DOLLARS last year, far more than expected. Between Walmart and China they should . . . EAT THE TARIFFS, and not charge valued customers ANYTHING. I’ll be watching, and so will your customers!!!”

Item two: “After causing catastrophic inflation, Comrade Kamala announced that she wants to institute socialist price controls . . . Her plan is very dangerous because it may sound good politically . . . This is Communist; this is Marxist; this is fascist.”

If you guessed that both are statements by Donald Trump, you have broken the code on the bizarro world of the President’s second-term economic policies. Last year he blasted Kamala Harris’s proposal for price controls on groceries. But now he is attacking Walmart for warning that it will have to raises prices in the wake of Mr. Trump’s tariffs.

Mr. Trump’s flip-flop on price controls is a rebuttal of his own previous tariff claims. For months he’s said that foreign producers pay the full cost of tariffs. But now he’s admitting that Walmart, an American retailer, will have to eat some of the costs or pass them on to Americans.

Despite his business background, Mr. Trump doesn’t know much about retail. Walmart’s net profit margin is below 3%, so it doesn’t have much room to absorb the higher costs caused by tariffs. Retail competition is intense, and Walmart’s longtime comparative advantage has been lower prices.

Mr. President is telling a company how to run its business, along with a vague, implicit threat of retribution. Marxist? How would Mr. Trump react if Congress told him how much his family could charge for a Mar-a-Lago fee?

Mr. Trump is trying to duck the political fallout for his misguided tariff policy by blaming everyone else. Americans are too smart to fall for it.