The enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it’s the illusion of knowledge (Stephen Hawking)

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so (Mark Twain)

Invest with smart knowledge and objective odds

THE DAILY EDGE: 27 FEBRUARY 2019

Powell Delivers a Subtle Message to Markets

(…) In describing those crosscurrents, the first thing Powell highlighted was how “financial markets became more volatile” at the end of last year and how “financial conditions are now less supportive of growth.” He then talked about economic fundamentals and how “growth has slowed in some major foreign economies, particularly China and Europe.” Mentioning financial markets before the economy is as clear a signal as any that the Fed’s top priority is preventing another plunge in the stock market like the one in December, which many suspected was the real reason the Fed officially pivoted toward a more dovish stance in January. (…)

Nevertheless, the bond market is signaling that there’s a very high bar to any rate increases this year by the Fed. That was confirmed in JPMorgan’s widely followed weekly Treasury sentiment survey. It revealed that bond traders are now their most bullish since 2016 despite yields on U.S. debt falling to about their lowest levels of the last year and the government ramping up its borrowing to finance a $1 trillion budget deficit. As if that wasn’t enough, the Treasury Department’s monthly auction of seven-year notes drew the most demand since August, based on the amount of bids the government received relative to the amount sold. Institutional purchasers that deal directly with the Treasury took more than 25 percent of Tuesday’s $32 billion seven-year offering, the most since 2014. “Auction trades like supply is running out,” was the headline of a research note put out by FTN Financial in the wake of the sale. Supply, of course, is not running out. It’s getting more abundant. The ballooning budget deficit caused the U.S. to more than double its borrowing last year to $1.34 trillion, and predictions are that annual new issuance will range from $1.25 trillion to $1.4 trillion over the next four years. The bond vigilantes may someday regroup and push back against excessive borrowing, but there’s no sign of it now. (…)

The Obama-Trump Economic Boom The current expansion may soon be America’s longest, and neither inflation nor tariffs are likely to stop it.

Alan S. Blinder, professor of economics and public affairs at Princeton University and a former vice chairman of the Federal Reserve, has good points relative to the longevity of the cycle:

(…) Readers of these pages know that I’ve been critical of the president. But it must be said that his economic policies have been the shining stars in a dismal policy firmament. Like most liberal economists, I did not like the way he structured his tax cuts. And like many economists of all stripes, I thought the tax cuts might overheat an already-hot economy. But the latter worry appears to have been wrong, at least so far. The tax cuts seem to have boosted growth without exciting inflation. (…)

The economic storm clouds don’t look very threatening at the moment. (The political ones are another matter. More on that shortly.) (…)

That the Fed didn’t raise interest rates in January, even with the federal-funds rate barely above inflation, suggests that Jerome Powell may be an even more dovish Fed chair than Janet Yellen. It sure doesn’t look as if an overzealous Fed will squelch the expansion.

Another common expansion killer, though not lately, is a spike in the price of oil. Predicting the price of oil is a fool’s errand, and I won’t try. But a jump to, say, $90 or $100 a barrel doesn’t look likely any time soon. (…)

Exports to China are only about 1% of U.S. gross domestic product. Even if they fell by half—well, you can do the math. America’s total exports to all countries are vastly larger. But lately, our bellicose president doesn’t sound inclined to declare trade war on Canada. Let’s hope it stays that way. (…)

Last but certainly not least, expansions are sometimes killed by sudden drops in either consumer or business confidence—or rather by the declines in spending that such drops engender. Might that happen in the next few months? I suppose so, but recent economic data don’t point in that direction.

Recent political “data” are a different matter. It is certainly possible that the U.S. will find itself in a full-fledged constitutional crisis in the coming months, precipitated by, say, the “national emergency” over immigration. What then? If business managers and market traders behave like Mr. Trump’s base, they’ll shrug it off: Constitution, shmonstitution. But if threats to democracy shake confidence, look out.

A low probability, you say? I agree. My bet is that the current expansion will sail through June, setting a new record. The names Obama and Trump will therefore be linked forevermore in economic history—possibly to the chagrin of both men.

U.S. Housing Starts Falter in December; Permits Hold Steady

Total housing starts dropped 11.2% (-10.9% year-on-year) during December to a 1.078 million annual rate (AR), its lowest level in 27 months (this report was delayed as a result of the government shutdown). December starts were substantially weaker than the 1.252 million expected by the Action Economics Forecast Survey. Moreover, starts for October and November were revised down by a total of 50,000.

Both single family -6.7% (-10.5% y/y) and multifamily -20.4% (-11.8% y/y) were hit hard in December. Starts fell in every region of the country except the Northeast where they were unchanged (+21.6% y/y). In the West, starts plummeted 26.3% (-39.7% y/y); in the Midwest they dropped 13.2% (-26.5% y/y); while in the South they were down 6.0% (+6.1% y/y). In the Midwest and West housing starts were at their lowest level since early 2015.

Building permits edged up 0.3% (0.5% y/y) to 1.326 million in December after a slightly-downwardly revised 4.5% gain in November. A 2.2% decline in single-family permits (-5.5% y/y) was offset by the 4.9% rise in multi-family (12.2% y/y). (…)

large image

U.S. Consumer Confidence Rebounds

The Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index jumped a great-than-expected 8.0% to 131.4 in February (1.1% year-on-year) reversing January’s decline. Still, confidence has fallen 6.5 points from the cycle high touched in October 2018. The Action Economics Forecast Survey expected a reading of 124.8. During the past ten years, there has been a 67% correlation between the level of consumer confidence and the year-on-year change in monthly real consumer spending.

As per January, the expectation component drove the shift in confidence, jumping 15.7% (-5.3% y/y) in February. Meanwhile, views of the present situation continue to improve, up 1.9% (7.6% y/y) to a cycle high 173.5. The labor market differential, representing the difference between respondents indicating jobs are plentiful and those saying jobs are hard to get, also rose to a cycle high 34.3. This series has a 97% correlation with the unemployment rate over the last ten years.

OPEC Curbs Will Continue Despite Trump Pressure Says Saudi Oil Minister OPEC will likely keep cutting its production in the second half of this year, Saudi Arabia’s oil minister said, defying pressure from the Trump administration to dampen oil prices.
Canada threatens not to ratify USMCA until U.S. ends steel, aluminum tariffs The move is designed to use Canada’s last opportunity to leverage the new United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement to put pressure on the White House into ending the duties

  • Canada’s ambassador to U.S. warns tariffs, approaching federal election puts USMCA ratification at risk

‘There’s No Money Right Now’: China’s Building Boom Hits a Great Wall of Debt A county in China’s deep south went on a borrowing binge to fund development. Several unfinished projects later, investors want their money back.

(…) The proliferation of private funds and other money-raising channels for local governments makes it difficult for economists and for Beijing to track the total amount of borrowings. Official figures pegged the sum of local and central government debt at 29.95 trillion yuan ($4.457 trillion) in 2017, roughly 36% of the economy. (…)

TREAT YOURSELF
Masters in Business Live, with Howard Marks of Oaktree Capital

RECESSION CALLING

Did you know there is a moose calling championship? During the three-day event, 50,000 applicants replicate the eerie sound a moose makes during mating season in the hope of winning one of the few available hunting permits.

Moose CallingThe contest entails callers to demonstrate their skills to the judges who vote on the moose caller who shows and demonstrates the best or most innovative moose calling techniques. (…)

It was like Kevin was in a trance. Although he was on a stage he wasn’t in his own mind… he was out on a moose hunt.

The audience sat through the performance but really wasn’t showing much emotion towards Kevin and his moose calling. I could imagine some saying “We’ve seen this stuff before!”

Then the unforeseen happened! Kevin’s 5 year old daughter, wearing her hunter blaze orange hunting gear got up on stage with her POP Gun and SHOT the moose. The audience apparently erupted in applause with shouting and whistling.

Kevin won the Moose Calling Championship for 2012 (his third straight win) in Maine and was awarded $1000.00. (…)

The championship being held just prior to the opening of the hunting season, the moose population traditionally renounces appearing at the contest to cast its expert opinion.

Another contest is more interested in the quantity of calls than in quality. You will all be happy to know that Guinness World Records has confirmed that Main Street Skowhegan and the Town of Skowhegan set the new world record for the most people moose calling simultaneously! The record was established on June 9, 2018, at the 2018 Skowhegan Moose Festival when 1,054 people participated in the world record attempt led by Registered Maine Guide Roger Lambert.

All the same for recession calling. It seems that 2019 will set a new record for the number of simultaneous recession calls. Time will tell if a recession will succumb to the calls and timely show up on stage.

Callers must be even sharper this time given that Jerome Powell seems uninterested to use his POP gun and abruptly end the contest.

A reader pointed to a recent Bloomberg op-ed from Danielle DiMartino Booth declaring that (my emphasis)

According to historic payroll data and the National Bureau of Economic Research, every time the three-month average unemployment rate exceeded its six-month average at cycle peaks over the past 50 years — like it did in January — the U.S. economy has experienced a recession. In a 2016 speech to the International Monetary Fund, then Federal Reserve Bank of New York President — and current Bloomberg Opinion contributor — William Dudley corroborated the historic pattern citing research first conducted earlier in his career at Goldman Sachs:

“History shows it is very difficult to push the unemployment rate back up just a little bit in order to contain inflation pressures. Looking at the post-war period, whenever the unemployment rate has increased by more than 0.3 to 0.4 percentage points, the economy has always ended up in a full-blown recession with the unemployment rate rising by at least 1.9 percentage points.”

Fact checking DiMartino Booth’s claim: obviously, the 3m average exceeds the 6m average much more often than there are recessions.

image

But if you read too rapidly, you missed the key part of her claim: “every time the three-month average unemployment rate exceeded its six-month average at cycle peaks over the past 50 years, the U.S. economy has experienced a recession.” We can all easily agree that every time we reached cycle peak the economy has experienced a recession not long after. The challenge remains to correctly call the darn cycle peak.

Perhaps if there are enough calls, the peak will graciously appear.

This next chart includes the unemployment rate in red (inverted right axis). Of course, once you have identified the actual peak, you can watch when the 3m average exceeds the 6m average to conclude that the cycle has effectively ended and “make your call”. But how many times will you have called the peak before the actual peak really happens? The call looked good on October 2016 when the unemployment rate rose from 4.8% to 5.0%. Oups! Not good enough. How about 1995, 1997, 1998? The recession began in March 2001. Or 1963, 1967, well before the recession started in December 1969?

image

The other twist is to have Bill Dudley, “then Federal Reserve Bank of New York President” having “corroborated the historic pattern”. At least she did cite Dudley correctly who, if I read well, is not exactly corroborating the “historic pattern” as described by DiMartino Booth:

Looking at the post-war period, whenever the unemployment rate has increased by more than 0.3 to 0.4 percentage points, the economy has always ended up in a full-blown recession with the unemployment rate rising by at least 1.9 percentage points.

David Rosenberg used the same Dudley pattern in early February to support his recession call which prompted me to comment in the Feb. 4 Edge and Odds:

David Rosenberg highlights the fact that the unemployment rate, at 4.0%, is up 0.3% from its 3.7% cycle low and that “the mean, median and mode is for the jobless rate to rise 0.4 of a point from the low by the time the recession hits. We are now three-quarters there. Data back to 1950 shows that at no point in the past did we see a 0.6 point increase off the trough without seeing a NBER-defined recession.”

This is true with the only possible exception being June-Nov. 1959 when the U3 rate rose 0.8 points before falling back to a new low in Feb. 1960, two months before the recession (!). However, there have been six occasions since 1950 when the U3 rate rose 0.4 or 0.5 points without being followed by a recession.

I sure wish calling recessions were that easy.

But DiMartino Booth added some meat to her cracked bone:

To Dudley’s point, the odds that layoffs will continue rising are high. As per January data from Challenger, Gray & Christmas, layoffs have risen over the prior year for six straight months. Economists would characterize that as an established trend. Retail and more recently, energy, have been some of the weakest sectors. Media is another sore spot.

Facts are:

  • There were other periods of “established trends” in CGC data: layoffs rose during 4 consecutive quarters between Q3’11 and Q2’12, and again during 3 consecutive quarters between Q1’15 and Q3’15. And yet, employment kept rising and the unemployment rate kept declining.
  • Retail layoffs have indeed been bad (42% of all announced layoffs in January) but she omitted to mention that most of January’s retail layoffs were “related to Gymboree’s plan to liquidate remaining stores in the U.S. and Canada, costing a reported 10,000 jobs”. Also omitted was CGC’s other comment that “Lowe’s announced it would hire 50,000 seasonal workers for the spring, as well as 10,000 permanent roles and 6,000 managers”.

Actually, CGC also points out that “retail is going through a transformation that may cost many jobs, but is also creating many jobs”. Brick and mortar jobs lost are more than offset by internet retailing. The BLS numbers on retail trade hires also has its own established trend:

image

As I mentioned last week, recent trends in aggregate hours worked do not suggest strongly rising layoffs:

image

But perhaps if we keep calling, something will eventually show up.