New Condo Sales Plummet
(…) The overall market in Manhattan is in a correction, brokers and developers said, as the supply of new apartments is increasing in many neighborhoods. The third quarter is usually a peak period for apartment sales, but new development sales plummeted in this year’s third quarter, down more than 30% compared with the same quarter in the previous three years, according an analysis of sales records by The Wall Street Journal. (…)
In more deals, developers are also agreeing to pick up closing costs, including the city and state transfer taxes of 1.825% usually paid by new condo buyers to close a deal, according to brokers and real estate lawyers.
Brokers who bring buyers to some buildings are being offered enhanced commissions of 4%, higher than the standard 3% in the industry.
Discounting is also on the rise. According to figures compiled by listing site StreetEasy.com, the share of listings in new buildings with price cuts of at least 5% has grown steadily during the past five years, to 8.7%, the highest figure since at least 2012. (…)
As U.S. Tariffs Bite, China Moves Again to Spur Its Economy China’s central bank is freeing up nearly $175 billion to get commercial banks to boost their lending and pay off short-term borrowings, the latest effort by Beijing to lift growth in a slowing economy as its trade fight with the U.S. escalates.
In a statement Sunday, the People’s Bank of China said it would reduce the amount of reserves most commercial banks are required to hold by 1 percentage point, effective Oct. 15. (…)
Analysts say the latest easing move will likely put pressure on an already depreciating Chinese yuan. A weaker currency would help Chinese exporters that are already bruising from the trade fight, but too much depreciation risks stoking concerns about the Chinese economy and capital outflows. (…)
-
Yuan Lending Rate Surges as China Struggles to Stem Currency’s Slide China’s effort to support its decelerating economy is heaping pressure on the yuan, signaling challenges for Beijing as it tries to stimulate growth without triggering destabilizing capital outflows.
The yuan weakened beyond 6.93 per dollar this week, coming within striking distance of its lowest level since January 2017, after China moved over the weekend to free more funds for domestic banks. The currency briefly recovered to around 6.91 in Tuesday trading in mainland China and Hong Kong after a short-term lending rate jumped. (…)
It was the fourth time this year that Beijing lowered the so-called reserve-requirement ratio for banks. Policy makers have also cut income taxes and encouraged more infrastructure spending at the local level to spur its economy, which has been hit by U.S. tariffs on hundreds of billions of dollars of Chinese goods. (…)
The worry is that weakening past that [7 per dollar] mark could reverberate among Chinese residents and companies, leading them to send money offshore. In 2016, the sharp depreciation of the yuan did exactly that. (…)
The yuan has depreciated most rapidly against the greenback this year but is also down against a basket of currencies. The yuan’s trade-weighted index has dropped by around 5.6% since its May peak. (…)
-
U.S. Concerned About Chinese Yuan’s Recent Drop, Official Says
-
US threatens to block China trade talks at G20 White House wants list of concessions from Beijing before Trump-Xi negotiations
-
U.S. Tariffs Won’t Force China to Back Down, Trade Minister Says
-
The U.S.-China Trade Battle Spawns a New Era of Tariff Dodges There are 18,927 individual codes to identify goods the U.S. imports, and switching them around is an increasingly popular way some Chinese exporters are ducking proliferating American tariffs, say trade professionals. The plywood industry is a case in point.
IMF Lowers Global Growth Forecasts for 2018 and 2019 Fund cites rising trade protectionism and instability in emerging markets in cutting outlook to 3.7% from 3.9% this year
(…) The IMF expects U.S. growth will be 2.9% this year, unchanged from its earlier forecasts. China’s economy is forecast to grow 6.6% this year, also unchanged from earlier forecasts, and 6.2% next year. (…) The eurozone economy is expected to grow 2% this year, down from a 2.2% estimate in July. (…)
IHS Markit’s data suggests even less optimistic scenarios:
Global economic growth moderated to a two-year low in September in a broad-based slowdown, according to the latest PMI surveys. Business confidence about the year ahead likewise fell to the gloomiest for two years, suggesting growth may weaken further in coming months. Average prices charged meanwhile rose at the fastest rate in the survey’s history, led by a spike in prices in the US.
The headline JPMorgan Global Composite PMI, compiled by IHS Markit, fell for a third successive month in September, down from 53.4 in August to 52.8, its lowest since September 2016. The latest reading is indicative of annual global GDP growth slipping below 2.5% (at market exchange rates).

(…) A key area of weakness remained global exports, which fell for the first time in over two years in September, representing a marked turnaround in worldwide trade since the surging growth seen at the start of the year. (…)
While output growth has slowed, global price pressures have intensified. Average input costs continued to rise at one of the fastest rates seen since the first half of 2011, linked in part to higher oil prices as well as increased wages and tariff-related surcharges, notably in the US.

Average selling prices for goods and services also rose sharply as firms pushed higher costs on to customers. The monthly rise in prices charged was the highest seen since comparable global data were first available in 2009.
Although prices charged for manufactured goods rose at a slightly slower rate during the month, service sector rates showed the largest increase on record, often highlighting resilient domestic demand.
If I read this well, the world has entered stagflation with global manufacturers experiencing a margins squeeze while services providers are pushing for higher prices to fight higher oil and labor costs.
The U.S. core goods CPI was down 0.2% YoY in August and down 1.0% annualized in the last and 6 months. Meanwhile, core services CPI is up 3.0% YoY in August and +3.0% annualized in the last and 6 months.
In the real world, that means that if you are selling goods in the USA, manufactured, wholesale or retail, you are fighting deflation on your sales while experiencing inflation on most of your operating costs. This is also known as a margin squeeze which manufacturers, wholesalers and retailers are trying to contain:

Source: @RobinBrooksIIF (via The Daily Shot)
It also means that U.S. consumers are facing 3.0% inflation on 60% of their expenditures (core services). Good thing for them that core goods (20% of expenditures) are deflating but that may not last for long with import tariffs now working their way through the supply chains. A good case in point is laundry equipment inflation currently at +13.6% after being hit with import tariffs early in the year. But prices are up another 7% annualized in the last 3 months as tariffs on steel and aluminum imports are now being passed through.
And now gasoline prices are up 18% YoY in the U.S.
September CPI will be released Thursday.
Meanwhile, the pressure on labor costs is unlikely to weaken any time soon:
Source: Deutsche Bank Research (via The Daily Shot)
In the same vein, Lazard Asset Management explains why tariffs are a much bigger potential threat to profits than to GDP (my emphasis):
The cumulative value of imports covered or threatened by new tariffs is $850 billion, or roughly 35% of all US imported goods. (…) The $850 billion in threatened imports is only about 4.4% of the nation’s GDP and the cost of an illustrative 25% tariff on this volume of trade would be just 1.1% of GDP. However, when measured against pre-tax corporate profits rather than GDP, these ratios rise to 36.4% and 9.1% respectively. (…)
Until 24 September, the bulk of tariffs put in place did not cover finished consumer goods. Even after that round of tariffs, covered products are disproportionately goods used by producers: capital equipment and intermediate goods. For example, just 18% of the US imports from China subject to new tariffs are consumer goods, while 32% are capital equipment and 48% are intermediate goods. In other words, the vast majority of tariffs to date have raised the cost of goods sold to American companies. It is not obvious how long it will take for cost increases that are not absorbed by these producers to channel their way to consumers.
Corporate profits also are effected by retaliation by US trade partners. These retaliatory tariffs have generally been proportional to US tariffs. (…)
Briefly stated, the worst is yet to come.


