The enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it’s the illusion of knowledge (Stephen Hawking)

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so (Mark Twain)

Invest with smart knowledge and objective odds

THE DAILY EDGE: 15 JULY 2021

THE INFLATION DEBATE

U.S. Producer Prices Jump More Than Expected in June

The Producer Price Index for final demand strengthened 1.0% (7.3% y/y) in June following a 0.8% May rise. The year-to-year increase is the largest in the series history, dating back to 2009. The index has risen at a 12.4% annual rate so far this year. A 0.6% rise for last month had been expected by the Action Economics Forecast Survey. The PPI excluding food and energy prices also rose 1.0% (5.6% y/y) in June after two months of 0.7% increase. The index has risen at a 10.0% annual rate during the last six months. A 0.5% June increase had been expected. The PPI less prices of food, energy and trade services rose 0.5% m/m (5.5% y/y), also following two months of 0.7% gain.

Prices for final demand goods increased 1.2% (11.7% y/y) in June after rising 1.5% in May. Final demand goods less foods and energy rose 1.0% (6.9% y/y) in June, after 1.1% and 1.0% increases in the prior two months. Core finished consumer goods prices rose 0.6% (3.7% y/y) about the same as in the prior three months. Durable goods prices surged 1.1% (4.9% y/y) following two straight 0.8% increases and the cost of core nondurable goods rose 0.3% (2.9% y/y) for a second month. Capital equipment prices gained 0.8% (3.6% y/y) for the second consecutive month.

Energy prices for final demand surged 2.1% (35.2% y/y following a 2.2% May rise. Gasoline prices strengthened 2.8% (81.1% y/y) after gaining 2.2% and the cost of home heating oil rose 5.6% (95.6% y/y following a 6.9% jump. (…)

Final demand services prices increased 0.8% (5.2% y/y) in June following two months 0.6% gain. Trade services prices surged 2.1% (5.8% y/y) after a 0.7% increase. Prices for final demand transportation and warehousing services rose 0.9% (8.2% y/y) after spiking 1.9% in May. Prices for services less trade, transportation, and warehousing rose 0.3% (4.7% y/y) after a 0.2% rise.

Construction costs increased 0.7% (3.5% y/y) in June after rising 0.6% and 1.1% in the prior two months.

Intermediate goods prices jumped 1.9% (22.6% y/y) in June after a 2.8% May surge.

image

That sure looks like a full pipeline. PPI measures are up 4-6% from February 2020 but the recent broad acceleration is significant:

fredgraph - 2021-07-15T063411.490

From the WSJ Editorial Board:

How do you define transitory? Three months? A year? Or is it two? Inquiring minds want to know after Tuesday’s report that the consumer price index rose 0.9% in June. Consumer prices are now up 5.4% from a year earlier, so what the Federal Reserve means when it dismisses these price increases as “transitory” takes on growing economic and political significance.

The June increase was nearly twice what economic forecasters predicted, which isn’t reassuring. The inflation optimists are dismissing the June increase as the result of “special” factors that are likely to ease. Used car and truck prices rose 10.5% in the month, accounting for about half the increase in core CPI. No doubt vehicle prices won’t keep rising at that rate, but then that’s also what we were told when they rose 10% in April. This won’t reassure the non-affluent Americans who buy used cars.

Price increases were widespread across the economy, which suggests factors that may not be transitory. Food prices rose 0.8%, and energy prices 1.5% in the month. The Fed likes to strip out food and energy prices, which are volatile, to examine core inflation. But the core increase was also 0.9% in June.

Year-over-year core prices are up 4.5%, which is less than for all consumer prices, but is still well above the Fed’s target of 2% a year. The last time core prices rose 4.5% in a 12-month period was 1991 and the Fed’s benchmark short-term interest rate was above 5%. Today it’s near zero. (…)

One risk for the Fed is that more months of these price increases will become what consumers and businesses come to expect. To use the Fed jargon, prices would no longer be “well-anchored.” That may be happening. The NFIB’s small business survey for June, released Tuesday, found the share of owners raising average selling prices rose seven points to 47%, the highest reading since January 1981.

unnamed (59)Source: Macrobond, ING

Owners are under pressure to raise prices because their costs are rising, especially for labor. Some 46% of small-business owners reported job openings that couldn’t be filled in the month. This is one result of the market distortion caused by excessive federal jobless benefits that exceed what people can make by working.

The political implications of this inflation spike could be potent. The price increases mean that real average hourly earnings fell 0.5% in June. They are down 1.7% in the last year. This is despite healthy wage increases and hiring bonuses from employers desperate to find and keep scarce workers. If real wages continue to fall, workers will demand higher pay untied to productivity increases, which will further increase inflationary pressure. It will also take the shine off the post-pandemic boom that President Biden wants to take credit for.

The price increases put Mr. Powell in a monetary and political bind of his own making. Some at the Fed may feel obliged to tighten money sooner than Mr. Powell would like. But if he does, that would raise the cost of financing the trillions of dollars in new spending that Democrats in Congress have passed, or soon will.

Watch for Democrats to keep the pressure on Mr. Powell this week by coaxing him to endorse more spending. They know Mr. Powell’s term expires next year, and they want to leverage his desire for reappointment into a fiscal endorsement.

All of which makes us wonder why Republicans would want to put their fingerprints on any of this Democratic spending. Democrats and the Fed own this inflation spike. If Republicans help pass a $1 trillion infrastructure bill, Democrats will make them co-owners.

  • Powell Says Fed Still Expects Inflation to Ease Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell said the central bank wouldn’t hesitate to raise interest rates to keep inflation under control but repeatedly emphasized he still expects price pressures to ease later this year.

Inflation “has been higher than we’ve expected and a little bit more persistent,” Mr. Powell said in a semiannual report Wednesday to House lawmakers. (…) Higher inflation readings “should partially reverse as the effects of the bottlenecks unwind.” (…) “We’re anxious, like everybody else, to see that inflation pass through,” he said. (…)

Mr. Powell said it would be a blunder to raise interest rates to address one-time increases in the prices of certain services, like air travel and hotel rates, or goods, like new and used cars, that have surged due to the reopening of the economy.

“Honestly, it would be a mistake to do it at a time when virtually all forecasters believe that these things will come down on their own accord,” Mr. Powell said. “It would be a mistake to act prematurely.”

There could come a point when “the risks may flip,” he said.

If inflation stayed too high or began to seep into consumers’ and businesses’ expectations of future inflation, which can be self-fulfilling, then the Fed would raise rates. “People need to have faith in the central bank that we will do that,” Mr. Powell added. (…)

“Inflation is not moderately above 2%. It’s well above 2%. It’s nothing like ‘moderately,’” Mr. Powell said. The question facing the Fed is “where does this leave us in six months or so when inflation, as we expect, does move down?” (…)

(…) “While some contacts felt that pricing pressures were transitory, the majority expected further increases in input costs and selling prices in the coming months,” the report said.

It said supply-chain disruptions became more widespread for both labor and materials, and that businesses reported low inventories and delivery delays.

The Fed also said the economy overall grew at a brisk pace over the past two months. “The U.S. economy strengthened further from late May to early July, displaying moderate to robust growth,” the Fed said. The report said the improvement came as consumers spent more on tourism, travel and other services that were restricted earlier in the pandemic. (…)

Wages increased at a moderate pace and demand for low-skilled workers rose, suggesting workers have increased leverage in a tight labor market.

Still, businesses told the Fed they were experiencing a widespread worker shortage, coupled with workers quitting or leaving jobs at an above-average pace. (…)

Retail businesses in the Northeast told the Fed that they had a hard time finding workers, even after raising wages by $1 to $2 an hour. (…)

Year-Ahead Inflation Expectations

Current Profit Margins

Year-over-Year Unit Costs

Future Influence of Labor Costs on Prices

Future Influence of Productivity on Prices

Future Influence of Non-Labor Costs on Prices

Long-Term Inflation Expectations

  • Some corporate comments via Axios:
    • “The inflation could be worse than people think,” JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon said on an earnings call Tuesday. “I think it’ll be a little bit worse than what the Fed thinks. I don’t think it’s only temporary.”
    • “[Policymakers] are saying jobs are more important than consumerism,” BlackRock CEO Larry Fink told CNBC on Wednesday. “That is going to probably lead to systematically more inflation.
    • “Is there somewhat more inflation out there? There is,” PepsiCo CFO Hugh Johnston said on an earnings call Tuesday. “Are we going to be pricing to deal with it? We certainly are.”
    • “Will Conagra take list pricing increases? The short answer is, yes,” Conagra CEO Sean Connolly said. “And we have more pricing coming.”
    • “[We’ve] done at least one large [price] increase earlier in the second quarter, and that was received fairly well,” Fastenal CFO Holden Lewis said on an earnings call Tuesday. “But based on what cost is doing, we’ll have to go to the market with some additional ones.”
  • John Authers: Bonds Are Predicting Another Hawkish Fed Mistake The conundrum of falling longer-term yields implies traders think policy makers will tighten too early, whatever Jerome Powell says.

(…) Now, inflation may or may not prove to be transitory, but it is the highest in decades. Month after month, the official numbers have turned out higher than expected. With higher inflation, investors should in theory demand a higher yield from bonds to compensate for the erosion of buying power. And any suggestion that interest rates are going to go up should, as Greenspan implied, lead to higher long-term yields. Yet they are falling. (…)

I think this point from Andrew Brigden, of Fathom Financial Consulting in London, is well made:

It is becoming increasingly apparent that the pick-up taking place in inflation, particularly in the US, is cyclical. It is not just a consequence of base effects. Traditionally, any cyclical pick-up in inflation has required a monetary policy response. But that is not the intention of policymakers at present. The FOMC continues to believe that the pick-up will be transitory. We have our doubts. Inflation overshoots driven by a spike in the oil price, by a change in tax rates, or by a depreciation of the currency, tend ultimately to subtract from household real incomes. In that sense, they can be self-limiting, and deflationary in the long run, and it is often appropriate for policymakers to look through them. But that is not what we are seeing here. Only in the unlikely event that higher product prices do not feed through at all to higher wages, which would require a very strong degree of faith in policymakers’ ability to rapidly bring inflation back to target, would a cyclical pick-up in inflation be self limiting.

(…)

(…) Policy makers led by Governor Tiff Macklem said Wednesday that they would reduce their weekly purchases of government debt by one-third to C$2 billion ($1.6 billion). Officials held the benchmark overnight interest rate at 0.25%, while indicating they don’t expect any hikes before at least the second half of next year — in line with previous guidance.

The decision to taper advances the central bank’s gradual return to more normal policy, which has put Macklem on the vanguard of unwinding stimulus among his peers. It’s the third time officials have downsized the asset purchase program, and it reinforces expectations the Bank of Canada will be among the first central banks in advanced economies to hike rates. (…)

Swaps trading suggests investors are fully pricing in a hike over the next 12 months, and a total of four over the next two years, which would leave Canada with one of the highest policy rates among advanced economies. (…)

In the U.S., investors aren’t pricing in any rate hike over the next year, and only two over the next two years. (…)

In its latest Monetary Policy Report, the Bank of Canada revised higher its profile for output and inflation amid growing optimism that households will start spending hoards of cash they’ve accumulated over the past year.

The bank now sees households spending 20% of the excess savings accumulated during the pandemic, something it hadn’t predict in its April report. (…)

While conceding that inflation will remain above 3% for much of the rest of this year, the central bank said the uptick reflects factors like gasoline prices, base effects from last year’s lockdowns and supply chain constraints that should fade. They see consumer price gains falling back down to near their 2% target later in 2022 because of lingering excess supply.

The economy will be in a period of excess demand by 2023, the Bank of Canada projected.

China’s Economic Growth Slows in the Second Quarter Despite the slower rate, China’s economic rebound continued to show unusual resilience more than a year after the country largely got control of the coronavirus within its borders.

(…) China’s government said Thursday that gross domestic product grew by 7.9% in the second quarter from a year earlier, in line with economists’ expectations. (…)

Beneath the headline GDP figure, stronger-than-expected readings on factory output, retail sales and fixed-asset investment data in June are likely to quiet rising speculation that Beijing will intervene more forcefully to keep its growth momentum going in the latter half of the year. (…)

With the 12.7% first-half growth figure, policy makers now appear to have lots of cushion to hit their full-year growth target of at least 6%—even if the economy slows considerably in the second half. (…) Many forecasters expect China to easily post 8% growth or more this year, given the low base of comparison from 2020. (…)

Industrial output rose 8.9% in the second quarter and 8.3% in June compared with a year earlier, according to data released by the National Bureau of Statistics Thursday, beating expectations.

Retail sales, a key measure for China’s consumer spending, increased 13.9% in the second quarter and 12.1% in June from a year earlier, also topping forecasts.

Fixed-asset investment grew 12.6% in the first six months of the year, again beating expectations.

China’s urban surveyed unemployment rate, its headline measure of joblessness, stood steady at 5.0% in June, the same as in May, the statistics bureau said. (…)

OPEC Reaches Compromise With U.A.E. Over Oil Production OPEC agreed to raise the amount of crude the cartel member can eventually pump, but it is subject to approval by a wider group of producers that includes Russia.

(…) The U.A.E. had asked for its so-called baseline—or the maximum amount of oil the group would recognize the country as being capable of producing—to be raised to 3.8 million barrels a day from 3.2 million barrels a day. In the compromise reached Wednesday with Saudi Arabia, the U.A.E. can increase that to 3.65 million barrels a day starting in April, according to people familiar with the matter. (…)

Other OPEC members could use concessions made to the U.A.E. to argue for increases in their own output inside the group, delegates said.

Goldman Sachs’ take:

(…) such an OPEC+ agreement would be bullish relative to our base-case (…). As a result, a deal as described above would imply downside risk to our OPEC+ production forecast of 0.4 to 0.6 mb/d on average for 3Q21-1Q22 (depending on whether the lack of August production hike is compensated for in September).

All else equal, this would represent $2 to $4/bbl upside risk to our $80/bbl summer and $75/bbl 2022 Brent price forecasts. While the lack of definitive OPEC+ production agreement (and the potential modest downside demand risk from the Delta COVID variant) leave our forecasts unchanged, we see such an OPEC+ agreement as the first of likely four potential bullish supply catalysts over the coming month that would more than offset higher recent realized North American production.

No Market Breadth, No Problem as Faangs Lift S&P 500 Higher

(…) Tech was among the top-performing sectors Wednesday. And while 429 stocks in the S&P 500 fell on Tuesday, tech was the only sector to close in the green — cushioning the index’s 0.4% drop. That’s the S&P 500’s largest number of decliners for a drop that small since at least 1996, according to Callie Cox, senior investment strategist at Ally Invest. (…)

Just eight stocks — the Faamg group of Facebook Inc., Apple, Amazon.com Inc., Microsoft Corp. and Google parent Alphabet, alongside Netflix, Nvidia Corp. and Tesla Inc. — accounted for more than half the S&P 500’s 7.6% gain since May 12, according to data from Bespoke Investment Group. And their weighting in the index rose to more than 27%. (…)

The S&P 500 has hit a record just about every three days this year, but few of its components are trading above their 50-day moving averages, Jason Goepfert, president and founder at Sundial Capital Research, wrote in a note. (…)

The Russell 2000 lost 1.6% yesterday while large caps indices were about flat. The 50 and 100dmas are now declining with the still rising 200dma 6% below.

iwm

TWO GOOD PODCASTS

Cornerstone Macro’s Nancy Lazar, firmly in the lowflation camp, and Weiss President & CIO Jordi Visser, a convinced inflationist, go back and forth arguing the variables and trends impacting inflation over the next several years. A nearly one hour podcast but its nice to listen to well articulated, “one-armed” economist/investor.

One of Jordi Visser’s argument is the wealth effect partly created by younger people being strongly invested in cryptos. This next podcast would not support this view, far from it…Also time well spent, even if you don’t care about cryptos; but you should care, even if you don’t invest in cryptos…

My recent foray into the world of the stablecoin tether and the companies and personalities surrounding it has been utterly fascinating.

I’ve seen many curious things during my career but the seemingly blatant nature of what certainly seems, at face value, like a gigantic fraud, has astonished me. In the recent June edition of Things That Make You Go Hmmm…, I dove into Tether (the company), Bitfinex and tether (the coin) and what I found blew my mind.

Much of my research was built upon the work of a group of tether skeptics, one of whom, Bennett Tomlin, agreed to join me for this discussion to hopefully bring the story to wider attention. It’s worth pointing out that Bennett is not a crypto-skeptic, but what he’s uncovered is a complex web of deceit and obfuscation that will, I suspect, take your breath away like it did mine. Joining Bennett and myself is George Noble, a hugely experienced hedge fund manager with an extraordinary track record. Like Bennett, George is not anti-crypto, but his own work on Tether has led him to similar conclusions.

Hopefully, this discussion between a stalwart of the financial industry and a man who has immersed himself deep in the crypto world can help both sides understand each other better and you to gain a perspective on what could well become the biggest story in crypto in the coming weeks and months…

THE DAILY EDGE: 14 JULY 2021: …flation

Inflation Accelerated in June as Economic Recovery Continued U.S. consumer prices rose 5.4% in June from a year earlier, keeping inflation at the highest annual rate in 13 years.

(…) The so-called core price index, which excludes the often volatile categories of food and energy, rose 4.5% from a year before. (…) Prices for used cars and trucks leapt 10.5% from the previous month, driving one-third of the rise in the overall index, the department said, marking the third straight month of big price increases amid a supply shortage of vehicles. The indexes for airline fares and apparel also rose sharply in June. (…)

Compared with two years ago, overall prices rose 3% in June. Overall prices jumped at a 9.7% annualized rate in the three months ended in June, on a seasonally adjusted basis, faster than the 8.4% pace in May.

Much of the increase in June was driven by factors that are likely to subside in coming months, including the semiconductor chip shortage that is reducing the supply of autos and the post-reopening surge in consumer demand. Accelerating prices for new and used cars and gains in prices for lodging and transportation services, which includes car and truck rentals, contributed the vast majority of the core CPI increase.

But prices of goods and services less directly influenced by these trends are picking up too. For example, rents are now rising at a pace slightly faster than before the pandemic. Stripping out those more temporary contributions, the core index nonetheless rose at a pace that would normally be considered relatively healthy though not enough to signal a worrisome pickup in inflation, said Alex Lin, U.S. economist at BofA Global Research.

More companies are passing on higher labor and materials costs to consumers. Many also are raising prices for the first time in years, as demand surges following pandemic-related business restrictions. (…)

The facts:

  • Core CPI has increased 0.85% MoM on average in the past 3 months. For all of Q2, it is up 2.0% QoQ. No base effect here.

fredgraph - 2021-07-13T104234.143

  • Both total CPI and core CPI are now well above pre-pandemic trends:

image

  • Core Goods prices jumped another 2.2% MoM in June following +1.8% in May and +2.0% in April. They are up 8.7% YoY. Used cars and trucks prices again boosted the number but even excluding this item, Core Goods prices were up 0.44%, 0.66% and 0.56% MoM in April, May and June respectively, +6.7% annualized in the last 3 months. No base effect there.

unnamed - 2021-07-14T074921.515

Data: Cox Automotive; Chart: Axios Visuals

  • Shelter costs, nearly 33% of CPI, rose 0.5% in June and are up 4.9% annualized in Q2. This sticky component is just starting to adjust to the jump in house prices. It will likely dominate inflation trends in the next year given the usual lags. Nationwide, rent prices are up 7.5% so far this year, three times higher than normal, according to data from Apartments.com.

fredgraph - 2021-07-13T111559.199

  • The FOMC has recently been giving more importance to the trimmed-mean inflation rate which weeds out the top and bottom 16% of monthly price movers. This measure, stuck at the 2% annualized range since 2017, jumped to 5.0% QoQ annualized in Q2.

fredgraph - 2021-07-13T111953.816

image

  • The Atlanta Fed’s Flexible Core CPI, a weighted basket of items that change price relatively frequently, exploded in Q2. Its Sticky Core CPI, a weighted basket of items that change price relatively slowly, is up 4.3% annualized in the last 3 months, down from 4.6% in May but still its highest level since 1995. It has been trending up in the last 10 years, getting above 2.5% just before the pandemic.

image

  • BTW, the BLS now publishes an index that excludes food, shelter, energy and used cars and trucks. Bloomberg’s John Authers has the chart:

unnamed - 2021-07-14T080027.524

  • Transitory or not, everybody has to be surprised by the recent inflation numbers. The 0.9% MoM jump in the June CPI was well ahead of the consensus prediction of 0.5% while the core also rose 0.9% MoM versus the 0.4% consensus. It may prove “transitory”, but at a much higher level than previously thought. As ING points out,

There were 0.3% or 0.4% MoM component readings throughout, suggesting broad inflation pressures (…). Meanwhile, food rose 0.8% MoM, apparel was up 0.7%, housing rose 0.4%, gasoline rose 2.5% MoM with medical care the only component to post a decline (-0.1% MoM). This means that the annual rate of headline inflation is now running at 5.4% – just below the 2008 oil price spike induced peak of 5.6%. However the annual rate of core inflation is now 4.5%, which it was last at in November 1991! (…)

[With yesterday’s] National Federation of Independent Business survey with a net 47% of respondents currently raising their prices – the highest balance since January 1981 – with a net 44% of firms looking to raise prices further over the next three months. This casts even more doubt on the Fed’s position that we should soon expect a significant decline in price pressures.

The upside inflation risks will be compounded by housing costs since primary rents and owners’ equivalent rent account for a third of the CPI basket. Movements in these components tend to lag 12-18 months below house price changes, as the chart below shows. We suspect that the housing components of inflation will be the story to watch through the second half of this year.

House prices and the relationship with housing CPI costs Source: Macrobond, INGSource: Macrobond, ING

Rampant demand in China is sucking in chilled cargoes of gas from the U.S., after a year in which American energy companies throttled back production. A drought in Brazil has added to the competition by curtailing power output from hydroelectric dams.

Searing heat in Canada and the Pacific Northwest has also lifted gas demand. Some places are missing out, like Pakistan, where a shortage of gas and the delayed onset of the summer monsoon have prompted power outages.

Europe, in particular, is feeling the pinch. With vessels of liquefied natural gas heading to Asia, buyers on the continent have struggled to replenish tanks and caverns after a long and cold winter. Storage levels are the lowest for this time of year in a decade, said Natasha Fielding, a gas analyst at Argus Media.

The price of gas at a trading hub in the Netherlands shot to a record $13.10 per million British thermal units in July, according to S&P Global Platts data going back to 2004. Barring mild temperatures this winter, gas prices are likely to remain elevated globally for at least another year, according to Chris Midgley, head of analytics at the commodities-data firm.

“There just isn’t enough [liquefied natural gas] to supply Europe,” Mr. Midgley said. “The LNG, of course predominantly coming out of the U.S., is being pulled into Asia and also into Latin America.”

High prices for gas, coal and emission permits—the main input costs for power plants—have fed off each other to send electricity markets skyward too. In Germany, Europe’s largest economy, power prices in July jumped to about €83.67, equivalent to around $99.26, a megawatt-hour, according to Argus. That is close to their highest level in figures dating back to 2000. U.K., Spanish and Italian power prices have shot to record highs. (…)

U.S. crude prices have risen 54% this year to about $75 a barrel and Americans drivers are paying more for gasoline than they have done in almost seven years. Thermal coal hasn’t been as expensive in a decade.

For consumers and businesses, it is a painful reminder that energy bills can go up as well as down. The jump is driving a quicker pace of inflation, though central banks say that effect will wash out. (…)

Profits are being squeezed in industries such as chemicals (…). Pharmaceutical and automotive companies that can’t readily raise prices for customers are among the most vulnerable (…).

image

John Authers:

Another alternative is the New York Fed’s measure of “underlying inflation,” which is fiendishly complicated but involves disaggregating the bureau’s data, looking at plenty of other measures, and seeking out the underlying trend. The latest number for June hasn’t been published yet [it was published late yesterday]; as of May this measure showed a sharp rise to 3% [June is 3.5%], and it’s a fair bet that it will now be right at the top of its range.

But it’s interesting that this measure, first of all, provides a smoother pattern (without a spike in 2008), that it shows inflationary pressure rising a bit ahead of the pandemic, and that it is influential over monetary policy. A significant rise in underlying inflation, so measured, has tended in the past to lead the Fed to tighten. Doubtless many in the markets expect the same again:

unnamed - 2021-07-14T080532.393

Transitory or not, higher overall inflation rates, particularly on basic essentials such as food and energy, are starting to bite hard on discretionary labor income. Total CPI is now rising 2% faster than wages. The June CPI Food-at-Home index is 5.4% above its February 2020 level and the CPI-Energy index is 8.9% above. Nobody wants stagflation now!

fredgraph - 2021-07-14T070316.427

According to the Chase spending tracker, consumer expenditures are now back to pre-Covid trends, up 14.3% from two years ago…

image

…even though growth in expenditures on goods is flattening with June Control Sales seen down 0.8% MoM. Control Sales have edged lower since March but remain 18% above their pre-pandemic level.

image

During yesterday’s JPM conference call, Jamie Dimon said of the American consumers: “The pump is primed. Their house value is up, their stock value is up, their incomes are up, their savings are up, their confidence is up.”

As the economy reopens, a rising share of expenditures will go to Services. So far, this has not hurt spending on Goods much but sharply higher prices on basic goods and services would quickly impact discretionary spending. BTW, the CPI-Food-Away-From-Home index is up 5.5% from its February 2020 level and +7.8% a.r. in the last 2 months.

Such a scenario would greatly support Michael Wilson’s scenario:

Michael Wilson, Morgan Stanley’s chief equity strategist, made a case in his last Monday Weekly Warmup for a series of rolling corrections ultimately ending by a 20% “de-rating” of equities.

Over the past several months we have taken a less optimistic view of the markets than most based on our “mid cycle transition” narrative. During such periods, it’s common for the market to rotate away from early cycle winners toward larger cap, higher quality stocks. This rotation away from early cycle leadership and small caps is now well established and underway (Exhibit 1). There is also a de-rating process for the broader market of approximately 20% that usually occurs (Exhibit 2).

The S&P 500 Index is up 16.7% YtD but it has been challenging to even match that for most investors: only 5 of 11 sectors did better including Energy (+39.4%) and Financials (+25.6%) leading the way. These 2 sectors peaked in early June and have since lost 10.1% and 8.0% respectively. In fact, eight sectors have suffered meaningful setbacks this year, ranging from -6.8% (Industrials and Cons. Staples) to 14.9% for Energy and -13.7% for Cons. Discretionary earlier in the year.

Investors clearly have no conviction and scramble to adapt to changing circumstances and moods.

Compare these four charts to get a sense of how narrow and inherently volatile this market has become:

 spy rsp

 sly iwm

Even the NYFANG index has turned into a heart pounding roller coaster after almost doubling since its March 2020 low.

nyfang

Canadian Retail Foot Traffic Jumps in Sign of Pent-Up Demand

Canadians are eager for in-store shopping as virus restrictions ease, according to geolocation data compiled by SafeGraph Inc.

The San-Francisco based analytics firm released complete Canadian data for the first time this week, showing foot traffic at clothing stores is up 44% in June from the same month in 2019, according to a Bloomberg analysis of the numbers. In May, the two-year gain was 19%. (…)

Cathie Wood Sells China Tech Stocks, Warning of Valuation Reset

(Factset vis The Market Ear)

How Biden’s Executive Order Could Reshape Rail and Ocean Shipping The Biden administration says the relatively small number of major players in the ocean-shipping trade and the U.S. freight-rail business has enabled companies to charge unreasonable fees. New rules target what the White House says is a pattern of consolidation

President Biden’s sweeping executive order signed last week laid out the administration’s priorities for promoting competitive markets and limiting corporate dominance. Among the dozens of provisions included in the order are directives aimed at railroads and ocean shipping.

The administration says the relatively small number of major players in the ocean-shipping trade and the U.S. freight-rail business has enabled companies to charge unreasonable fees. In the case of the seven Class 1 freight railroads, consolidation has given some railroad companies control of most of the freight tracks in parts of the country.

The executive order encourages the Surface Transportation Board to take up a longstanding proposed rule mandating so-called reciprocal or competitive switching, the practice whereby shippers served by a single railroad can request bids from a nearby competing railroad if service is available. The competitor railroad would pay access fees to the monopoly railroad, but could win the shipper’s business by offering a lower price, using the rival railroad’s tracks and property. The railroad trade association, the Association of American Railroads, has opposed the policy. (…)

The executive order asks the maritime commission to take steps to protect American exporters from high fees. The order also asks the commission to work with the Justice Department to enforce its actions.