The enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it’s the illusion of knowledge (Stephen Hawking)

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so (Mark Twain)

Invest with smart knowledge and objective odds

THE DAILY EDGE: 7 FEBRUARY 2019: Sentiment Shifts

U.S. Trade Deficit Narrows As Oil Prices Fall

The U.S. trade deficit in goods and services lessened to $49.31 billion during November from $55.70 billion in October, revised from $55.49 billion. Exports declined 0.6% (+3.7% y/y) after an unrevised 0.1% easing in October, while imports fell 2.9% (+3.2% y/y) after a 0.4% gain in October, revised from 0.2%.

The deficit in goods trade declined to $70.5 billion in November from a record $77.1 billion in October. Exports of goods declined 0.9% (+4.6% y/y), but rose slightly in real terms. Foods, feeds and beverage exports rebounded 0.6% (-2.2% y/y) following four months of sharp decline. Auto exports fell 3.0% (-8.8% y/y) after a 1.9% drop, while non-auto capital goods exports weakened 5.0% (+1.4% y/y). Industrial supplies exports fell 2.9% (+11.4% y/y). Exports of petroleum declined 3.8% (+31.7% y/y) as prices fell. Constant dollar petroleum exports increased 6.4% m/m and by nearly one-quarter y/y.

Imports of goods decreased 3.6% (+3.4% y/y) in November after rising for six straight months. In constant dollars, imports fell 3.0% (+1.9% y/y) after little change in October. Nonauto consumer goods imports declined 7.5% (+2.2% y/y). Foods, feeds and beverages imports fell 1.2% (+3.8% y/y) while imports of capital goods improved 0.6% (1.8% y/y). Imports of automobiles gained 0.8% (6.4% y/y) and have risen steadily since May. Industrial supplies imports declined 6.9% (+2.4% y/y) but fell 5.2% in real terms (-4.1% y/y).

The trade deficit with China declined to $37.9 billion (NSA) in November. Exports to China fell 5.1% (-32.1% y/y), the fourth sharp decline in five months. Imports declined 10.9% (-3.3% y/y) after a 4.4% rise. (…)

 image image

Source: National Bank of Canada (via The Daily Shot)

THE CHINA SYNDROME

  • ‘This One Here Is Gonna Kick My Butt’—Farm Belt Bankruptcies Are Soaring Throughout much of the Midwest, U.S. farmers are filing for chapter 12 bankruptcy protection at levels not seen for at least a decade, a Wall Street Journal review of federal data shows. Trade disputes over agriculture are adding pain to low commodity prices that have been grinding down American farmers for years.

A wave of bankruptcies is sweeping the U.S. Farm Belt as trade disputes add pain to the low commodity prices that have been grinding down American farmers for years.

Throughout much of the Midwest, U.S. farmers are filing for chapter 12 bankruptcy protection at levels not seen for at least a decade, a Wall Street Journal review of federal data shows.

Bankruptcies in three regions covering major farm states last year rose to the highest level in at least 10 years. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, which includes Illinois, Indiana and Wisconsin, had double the bankruptcies in 2018 compared with 2008. In the Eighth Circuit, which includes states from North Dakota to Arkansas, bankruptcies swelled 96%. The 10th Circuit, which covers Kansas and other states, last year had 59% more bankruptcies than a decade earlier.

States in those circuits accounted for nearly half of all sales of U.S. farm products in 2017, according to U.S. Department of Agriculture data.

The rise in farm bankruptcies represents a reckoning for rural America, which has suffered a multiyear slump in prices for corn, soybeans and other farm commodities touched off by a world-wide glut, made worse by growing competition from agriculture powerhouses such as Russia and Brazil.

Trade disputes under the Trump administration with major buyers of U.S. farm goods, such as China and Mexico, have further roiled agricultural markets and pressured farmers’ incomes. Prices for soybeans and hogs plummeted after those countries retaliated against U.S. steel and aluminum tariffs by imposing duties on U.S. products like oilseeds and pork, slashing shipments to big buyers.

Low milk prices are driving dairy farmers out of business in a market that’s also struggling with retaliatory tariffs on U.S. cheese from Mexico and China. Tariffs on U.S. pork have helped contribute to a record buildup in U.S. meat supplies, leading to lower prices for beef and chicken. (…)

Low prices and mounting farm debts have sparked fears of more farm closures to come, among both large-scale farms that grew rapidly on rented land and small farms run by families working multiple jobs. (…)

More than half of U.S. farm households lost money farming in recent years, according to the USDA, which estimated that median farm income for U.S. farm households was negative $1,548 in 2018. Farm incomes have slid despite record productivity on American farms, because oversupply drives down commodity prices. (…)

Nationwide, the volume of loans to fund current operating expenses grew 22% in the fourth quarter from year-ago levels, hitting a quarterly record of $58.7 billion, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. The average size of these loans rose to $74,190, the highest fourth-quarter level in history when adjusted for inflation, the bank said. (…)

“We thought 2019 would be the year things turned around,” said Mr. Hudnutt. “Then the trade dispute happened and that really put a damper on things.” (…)

Nathan Kauffman, Omaha branch executive at the Kansas City Fed, called the recent rise in bankruptcies modest. He said that while further increases are likely, he doesn’t anticipate a sharp jump in filings, though the downturn in agriculture could drag on for years to come. (…)

Past Five Years Were Hottest on Record, Scientists Say The past five years have been the hottest in modern records, federal scientists said Wednesday, the latest in a series of warnings as House Democrats promise to combat climate change.

 image image

 image image
International Student Enrollment Drops for Second Year, Report Says The international market for U.S. graduate education is softening. For the second year in a row the number of students from abroad who enrolled in U.S. graduate schools fell by 1%.
SENTIMENT WATCH

Still an unloved bull market:

Yesterday, the WSJ had a lead article titled Don’t Obsess Over the Earnings Season Earnings are overrated.

Today:

Tepid Earnings Forecasts Are Next Test for Bull Market The yearslong expansion in U.S. corporate profits may be coming to an end sooner than investors expected, another warning sign for the nearly decadelong bull market.

More than 30 companies in the S&P 500, including Netflix Inc., Delta Air Lines Inc.DAL -0.04% and Estée Lauder Cos., have offered first-quarter earnings forecasts that fell short of analysts’ estimates in recent weeks, citing deteriorating outlooks for the global economy as well as uncertainty around trade policy.

The flurry of tepid forecasts has put companies in the broad stock-market index on track to report a 1.4% decline in profits in the first quarter from a year earlier—a marked deterioration from September when earnings for the period were projected to grow by about 7%.

If those numbers pan out, it would mark the first year-over-year profit decline for large U.S. companies since the second quarter of 2016. It would also show momentum flagging after multinationals, ranging from technology firms to retailers, delivered robust results for the end of 2018, carrying the S&P 500 to its fifth consecutive quarter of double-digit earnings growth. (…)

The cuts to first-quarter estimates have affected all 11 sectors of the S&P 500, with energy and technology companies seeing the biggest revisions in January. Now, seven of those sectors are projected to report a decrease in earnings for the first quarter. (…)

“What the markets like least in the world is negative earnings growth,” said Jerry Braakman, chief investment officer of First American Trust, which manages $1.3 billion for clients in Santa Ana, Calif. (…)

Morgan Stanley analysts, who have been among the more bearish of Wall Street firms in the past year, said this week that they “wouldn’t be surprised” if S&P 500 companies wound up delivering lower earnings every quarter of 2019.

Goldman Sachs analysts said, in a recent note, that lower oil prices and pockets of economic weakness in the U.S. support a more conservative earnings outlook for the year. “More estimate reductions are likely rather than boosts to forecasts,” the analysts wrote.

EARNINGS WATCH

With 282 companies in, the beat rate is 70% and the Surprise Factor rises further to +3.4% bringing the blended growth rate to 16.1%, exceeding the Jan. 1 estimate of 15.8% for the first time this season. Companies that have reported showed an 18.0% earnings growth rate, raising the possibility that Q4’18 earnings growth may actually get even better.

Revenues are in a similar situation as companies having reported showed a 6.8% growth in revenues while the current expected growth is 5.8% and the revenue beat rate is 61% with a 0.5% surprise factor.

Trailing EPS are now $162.57, above the full year forecast of $161.98.

Refinitiv/IBES data continue to show Q1’19 earnings rising 0.3% (0.8% ex-Energy).

Tech Rally Puts Nasdaq on Cusp of Exiting Bear Market Optimism about U.S.-China trade deal and U.S. monetary policy has pushed shares of large technology firms higher

The Nasdaq Composite is on the cusp of exiting a bear market, rebounding nearly 20% from its Christmas Eve low and highlighting the resilience of the technology shares that have long powered the market higher. (…)

If the index achieves the feat in the next five days—closing at or above 7431.504—it would mark its second fastest such rebound since its inception in the 1970s, according to Dow Jones Market Data. Despite the recent surge, the index is still down 9.1% from its Aug. 29 high.

Meanwhile, the S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average, which narrowly avoided entering a bear market, have also surged since Christmas. The indexes are both up more than 16% from their lows. (…)

FYI, 86% of the 37 Technology companies that have reported (31 remaining) beat their estimates with a +2.1% surprise factor. Analysts are forecasting this important sector (20% of the market) to post negative growth in each of the next 3 quarters and be the only sector other than Energy to post negative earnings growth in 2019.

image

image

Not that the past will necessarily repeat itself, but let’s recall that, since Q4’16, Technology companies’ beat rate averaged 89.6% and their surprise factor +7.2%.

SENTIMENT WATCH II
JPMorgan Says Boost Your Risk Positions. And Unwind Those Hedges

The bank’s global strategists continue to favor equities relative to bonds, saying in a monthly report that markets are still some way off from fully pricing in less tightening from the Fed. With valuations more supportive, they scrapped hedges that helped cushion performance going into December. They lifted allocations to emerging-market stocks and bonds.

“This decisive dovish shift, to the extent it is sustained, is removing some of the headwinds that caused the 2018 market rout and raises the prospect of 2019 being an asset-reflation year,” JPMorgan strategists led by London-based Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou wrote in the Feb. 6 note. (…)

“This dynamic is not only related to a more optimistic view on U.S.-China trade negotiations, but also the possibility that the lagged effects from previous stimulus combined with new stimulus measures will make China look better than last year from a stimulus-traction point of view,” they wrote.

Please, also consider these charts:

Source: CNN (via The Daily Shot)

NDR’s Daily Trading Sentiment Composite (courtesy of CMG Wealth) also switched to optimism (bearish):

    

Source: Ned Davis Research

Right when we are bumping against the (now rising) 200 dmas:

ndxx
spy

image

THE DAILY EDGE: 6 FEBRUARY 2019: Fluctuations

U.S. Services PMI: Joint-weakest rise in new business since October 2017

January data signalled a further upturn in business activity across the service sector. The rise in output was the slowest for four months, amid one of the softest increases in new business seen for more than a year. Although only fractional, new export orders fell for the second successive month. In line with a slower rise in new business, employment growth eased to the second-weakest since June 2017. However, firms registered a stronger degree of confidence towards business activity levels over the coming 12 months.

The seasonally adjusted final IHS Markit U.S. Services Business Activity Index registered 54.2 in January, down slightly from 54.4 in December. Anecdotal evidence linked the solid rise in business activity to a sustained increase in new orders and greater client demand. That said, the rate of expansion was the softest for four months and weaker than both the series trend and the average seen in 2018.

image

New business received by service providers continued to increase at a solid rate, and one that matched that seen in December. The upturn was, however, the joint-slowest since October 2017. Where a rise was reported, panellists often attributed this to the release of new product lines and solid domestic demand. Others, meanwhile, suggested client demand growth remained subdued in comparison to the first half of 2018.

Service sector firms noted a decrease in foreign client demand in January, signalling the second successive month the respective seasonally adjusted index has posted below the 50.0 no change mark. The decline in new business from abroad was only fractional but was the third fall in the past six months.

Meanwhile, price pressures eased in January, with the rate of input price inflation softening to a 22-month low. The increase in cost burdens was also slower than the series trend but solid overall. Panellists stated that higher input prices were linked to greater raw material and wage costs. However, others noted that lower fuel prices had led to reduced cost pressures.

Firms were able to pass on higher input costs to clients through greater output charges in January. The rate of charge inflation picked up from December’s 12-month low, albeit remaining well below last year’s peaks. Alongside reports of the need to pass on higher costs, a number of panellists suggested they were able to increase their operating margins.

January data signalled a renewed accumulation in backlogs of work at service providers. That said, a softer expansion in new work resulted in a weaker rate of job creation. Employment growth was the second-slowest since June 2017 (behind November 2018).

Business activity expectations picked up in January, with the degree of optimism rising since December. Panellists noted that positive sentiment stemmed from hopes of more favourable demand conditions, however, the level of confidence was still historically subdued.

The Composite PMI Output Index posted 54.4 in January, matching that seen in December. The solid expansion was nonetheless one of the weakest seen in the last year and below the average seen in 2018.

image

Conversely, new business across the private sector increased at a faster pace. The upturn accelerated following a quicker rise in new orders across the manufacturing sector. A softer rise in new export orders among manufacturers and a contraction in new business from abroad in the service sector, led to the the slowest overall increase in new export business since last October.

Price pressures continued to soften across the private sector, with the rate of input price inflation easing in both the manufacturing and services sector. Strong client demand, however, allowed firms to increase their output charges at a faster pace in January.

Meanwhile, employment growth also eased, taking the rate of private sector job creation to the slowest since June 2017. Weaker service sector hiring offset an upturn in manufacturing employment growth.

Finally, survey respondents expressed a stronger degree of confidence towards the outlook for output over the coming 12 months, though the overall level of optimism remained below the average seen last year.

At current levels, the surveys are consistent with annualised GDP growth of around 2.5% at the start of the year.

RECESSION WATCH

Pick your chart:

  • The NY Fed (yield-curve based model) (The Daily Shot)
  • U.S. Economy vs. Yield Curve – Low U.S. Recession Risk (Ned Davis via CMG)

  • Longview’s view:

Source: Longview Economics

  • Barclay’s view (NDR via CMG):
OPEC Pursues Formal Pact Between Cartel and Russia Saudi Arabia and its Persian Gulf allies are proposing a formal partnership with a 10-nation group led by Russia to try to manage the global oil market, according to OPEC officials, in an alliance that would transform the cartel.

(…) The proposal by the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries would formalize the loose union between OPEC members and the group led by Moscow, which includes some former Soviet republics and other countries including Mexico. The two groups have increasingly worked together in recent years, including in December when they agreed on a deal to curb production.

Iran and other producers have opposed a tighter partnership, fearing it could be dominated by Saudi Arabia and Russia, according to officials in the cartel. (…)

In December, the 14-strong OPEC and the 10 allies led by Russia reached a new agreement to tackle an oversupplied global crude market by cutting production by a combined 1.2 million barrels a day.

At the time, the groups put off a final decision on the nature of their future cooperation. The groups first collaborated in late 2016 to help oil prices to rebound after a two-year crash. It was Russia’s first solid alliance with the cartel in decades.

Under the proposal, OPEC would continue regular meetings to agree on production and monitor implementation with the Russia-led group, according to OPEC officials. Under the current draft document, the alliance could last up to three years and wouldn’t be legally binding, one of the OPEC officials said.

Participants still need to iron out differences, said another OPEC official. The first cartel official said all sides were likely to end up agreeing on some arrangement as oil prices could fall without a deal. Traders believe OPEC needs to coordinate with Russia to balance supplies efficiently, the official said. (…)

Don’t Obsess Over the Earnings Season Earnings are overrated. As we reach the halfway point in the S&P 500’s fourth-quarter earnings season, investors are obsessing over financial reports and downgraded profit forecasts. Here’s a heresy: This doesn’t matter nearly as much as people think.

(…) Looking at 145 years of U.S. stock-market history collected by Yale University Prof. Robert Shiller, reported earnings moved in a different direction than stocks in 55 years. Even when they moved in the same direction, the gaps were often vast, as with 1997’s 31% gain in the S&P when earnings rose less than 3%.

Of course, investors attempt to anticipate earnings. One might think that what really matters isn’t earnings, but earnings expectations, proxied by the consensus forecast of analysts.

Surprisingly, changes in earnings estimates are as useless as changes in trailing earnings for forecasting price moves over the earnings season. Since 1985, the U.S. market and 12-month forward earnings estimates have moved in different directions in almost one in three quarters. The gap between their quarterly moves averages more than 5 percentage points, sometimes up, sometimes down. (…)

To put it simply: The stream of all future earnings is far more important than the latest quarter. Information about growth prospects outweighs the number of dollars per share a company delivered in the previous three months, or how much it will deliver in the next 12 months.

Theory backs this up. Future profits are expected to be worth far more than current profits for all but a few dying companies, so small changes to profit growth or to the discount rate, used to translate future profits into today’s money, have an outsize effect. A CEO who reports fat profits but leaves investors convinced of gloomy prospects ahead shouldn’t be surprised if the stock sinks.

The market has been dominated recently by worries about future earnings, not current earnings. The prospects of a trade war, tighter monetary policy and global economic slowdown hit the price-earnings multiple last year even as earnings headed for a stupendous 2018, juiced by tax cuts. This year some of those worries went into reverse, and the multiple expanded again. Moves in earnings reported for 2018 or predicted for 2019 weren’t the main driver. (…)

Facts are:

Earnings do matter…

image

…but so do fluctuating price/earnings multiple…

image

…which sometimes fluctuate very differently than earnings…

image

…primarily because of fluctuating inflation…

image

…but also because of fluctuating investor sentiment (chart from Ed Yardeni)…

image

…hence the Rule of 20 incorporating all of the above to better appreciate risk vs reward:

image

See also The Rule of 20 Strategy.

EARNINGS WATCH

We now have 258 companies in and a 71% beat rate. The Surprise Factor is now +3.1%, up from +2.0% on Jan. 28 when we had only 135 reports in. Recent Energy companies’ releases were surprisingly strong.

Q4’18 earnings are now seen up 15.8% (13.2% ex-Energy), in line with the Jan. 1 expectations.

Pre-announcement for Q1’19 are soft. The number of negative guidance is down from 38 at the same time during Q4’18 to 32 yesterday but only 14 companies guided positively so far, a marked decline from 26 at the same time during Q4’18. Perhaps executives have elected to wait a bit longer before committing themselves one way or the other. Only 49 companies guided for Q1 so far, down from 72 at the same time in Q4’18 and from 62 at the same time during Q1’18.

Q1’19 estimates are barely up at +0.4% (0.9% ex-E), down from 5.3% on Jan. 1. Q2 and Q3 earnings are expected up in the 3.0-4.0% range but Q4’19 are forecast to rise 9.9%, down from 11.5% on Jan. 1, bringing full year 2019 earnings up 4.6%, down from 7.3% expected on Jan. 1.

Trailing EPS are now $162.47